820142_Inspection_20200806

A I ivision of Water Resources (, u G ZQ
Facility Number 2 - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservat on
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Q-C_o fiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: worm °Arrival Time: 6 pity f I�-Departure Time:WAWA County: 504. $O p egion:
Farm Name: 04 1 i `Oe tdvre° Owner Email:
Owner Name: aim C 11 4 j(71� e Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: £c& . -15 f3 el, C Title: Phone:
On'site Representative: Integrator: P11esf `c'y •
Certified Operator: zic iM 9 f'l,( awry Certification Number: 5 p Qj P"B
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder .gf c ) Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts /
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®�Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
• Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No nNA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No IP,E4A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No A El NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E 1'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: I tcz- Date of Inspection: ( 4-V 6 i4
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [L].—Nkr J NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No '❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E 1 er' ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application ,—,�
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes L3'l�c ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window .// ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C f -C(--0 P
13. Soil Type(s): �! 0
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Lam"1Ve ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes al(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [g'NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 1721V o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes FIX ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Z.. - /1.f 2_ Date of Inspection: Ij ac, (W
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [C'NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes Q ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Z N( ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? • ❑ Yes n I Io- ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes E ltr El NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? v
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 014do ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes n ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) T/
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑43Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Po r —1 r( z,-(41(
C.,6 i‘+‘\f\-WCe' °C° 019
revftaii 11 -6- ( 1' 0-5; ?
(0VI' Vl SiftC � lL
D, 400 -P,e9 r
501\
C-� 61/(0 o --6B,S1f
Reviewer/Inspector Name: A V U. (94_a . Phone 0— l 3 v�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015