The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About820140_ Inspection_20200812 ;3 p„Ta ,r ''. ...s � c• t� -:;v f 7^{�1� �'3� , 'Ff r `^' ' x a. v1- -=- -. � ,: {�r�^ 04_' : M 34 x' `y may I 2 -� ,Tj f}t l {, r3 q,1 3L 11 �' "'.' `° '. ' y, '`? 5i�l t s i 1 0 �,' '.11y-,ev7-�a, J '„-M1 4 _ f C 4,-..,,., -3 e i�‘ rF GY [,'-.,.. 7y -. Z. h �.,,,-- C`,,--r: '' .i"ya x?sA` r_ 0• CfY pe of Visit: a Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance ` ason for Visit: ®Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access to of Visit: IA1 j W94 Arrival Time: if &4, f Departure Time:I /''r gs p County: Region: rm Name: y.c ervi, P 1 1 Z Owner Email: vner Name: tit 8 L-- Phone: Piing Address: ysical Address: cility Contact: fri 1 t`cik.et.se..,I kJ 0(i-t 5 Title: •Phone: i 'site Representative: l Integrator: i�13.34'i 1 T"t T. 1 i :rtified Operator: 0 WA,/ -Fy�-` Certification Number: J i ick-up Operator: Certification Number: (cation of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: , r.+�.c. -.' x;xr.-;,,:E.c>'ca „��,,..t ". s�- -- - ,.y...y - :r�..�y�,x '-'s R` ° ..r `tv-'` - -----,�,. -r'- k„,,o-.'*vr i`;�u_ .* h �.Kt; _i, nu, ,:u 44 :,,,:ev 'T^c';=` ?:. r7:N.:.4.-§' - «, ' „ _..f. a , ,,i _ £. "--lit* r„ F.._ _'•y y„,:- Y ,i..' ma''rry.--'.4+'m # +v v�l t.'�" -- .. �� SAY {.,t,, time. x" ;- tilri - a"'- v--,... -�7.:,. . -4g4; ,. �. . . `� =�; .c MSS .;- ,' ett . 0,,:_' :.. •��Sr��::,,2��,aa;��E ,,l�y..�',*'—��, ;�a�';g::� „�-..-.Y.f>Y^�f.y;�'-'c� (.�.]�{,��.�-.y.. _-�...�y �i' -.i:,�i� ,*n�fs`�'. j .ram �: jq nrtsf:;,� ,._` ,s k37f1LLe* '; E - ? f`,r '�ii,`, siY�47. "�.1`1i '` b�...3li q..� . _[i' x" �i m;r - 15,, 'xh'.�.'T ,._ "� g 11.Wean to Finish -- Layer Dairy Cow x •Wean to Feeder --•>`'„, Non-Layer Dairy Calf ti + -' ii S- 4-§ .'ffi _ ' % �<.1., Dairy Heifer ` Feeder to Finish -- _ 'v ' s f '''III Farrow to Wean e, ' €. ;,•4-; ,,;*: ';�. DUX g'. '.ail Dry Cow 0 _: `' Non-Dairy it iFk14 :EMI Farrow to Feeder 'iktf- c * .. 1< ` Vie Farrow to Finish ,� !mot Beef Stocker P'' ��.a Layers AI Gilts -- , Non-Layers _rBeef Feeder N* illBoars Pullets 'Beef Brood Cow . tAVr, z ,_ ..g&P _ : n.,� gam. 3 ;. = t ,� Turkeys • ,, •,a. - -,_..,,, .-�,;`� : Y:,`1 ; . , {r� � _ '�>;_ ,,5 Turkey Poults a- - '* , � F 'Other Other .•'5 `. . ,,, :, r-,` ...,,- ;: -F - M"�'- - "d,'3 : Y:t;,:�;k.�i;;t :","._aza�s«rr:'�c-4�. 5 _: �.7r"'y&'rb+.0,4c:3'-x W :ku-.o'".s*zcv if. " " _m :�*r :�5r 3'.0., s.:?.z.1 u ;'_`,-ate .:t 'r..-;€rs'r,��`:r,`.:,1,.—'t-sn n �= - Hscharges and Stream Impacts .Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ado❑ NA El NE • Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field El Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ENA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) 0 Yes 0 No NA ❑ NE 1.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No . ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? , Pane I of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: IDate of Inspection: `42 46-' Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [�kr"❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [J-NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: 6 ( 3'13 Spillway?: �S Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): A.,L f 0 g ( . 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan?If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [o ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE _maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ai to ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑, Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application.Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): S G 0 13.Soil Type(s): tA)'.- 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [CI.No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E'F10 0 NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE , acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents � 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes L_I ° ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facilityfail to have all components of the CAWMP readilyavailable?If yes,check Yes 'No - ❑ NA ❑ NE P ❑ the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements El Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Jo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes LEK ❑ NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued fil pc. 6 6 Facility Number: lqk- /la I Date of Inspection: 1:2_ ✓J� / 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 5.1Yes (�'NO ❑ NA 0 NE permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check - Yes �I� ❑ NA ❑ NE Z5.Is the facility out of compliance with g ❑ the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [EI No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes In< ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues ❑ ❑ 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No NA NE , and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes t No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 121 No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond ' 0 Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ElNE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ O/ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE -- - - - a ecommendations_'o'"an ;ott ei co n`y ieuts'~ _- , Comments refer fo:,"uestion`#)s;ExplainanyYES ansv�ers and/or:any=add�l?on 1 3' �, z U_ e draw.ci_ngsYof fac rty_�toXbe M'eiplatn srtuahons;(us_e ai cllhenal:page 4,0ec,ssary}=0:`, ... 1 iAR/+ (12 % ot< 1Z_(Z. 3-D cc4- e- tt 0610--3oe --GpSf ` C ..�� , ) k a f - C( `A333— �3 Reviewer/Inspector Name: �� t Phone: e vV Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ( �,��. P Date: a Page 3 of 2/4/2015