820139_Inspection_20200812

,F' p}x � t - r A :t ,! � >-LL [ j e i� G L -zKra vk w l+r ,`f �Y' o 7
F '4,���s 5 b 2t'�x ���� r. 6t v 4 . h� 5111, �y�; ,lf va 11 6.,3 I S.`C'' 4 i v I - "` +i
pe of Visit: •Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
a son for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Otherr 0 Denied Access i
to of Visit: C` (/•"90 K Arrival Time: /1 0( FM, Departure Time: /j 1'7 f YkCounty: 54-4e Region: FA-it' I
rm Name: -9 t '►i402r1.5 Fu-/
✓t, Owner Email:
vner Name: ►4tk.1 irt{ vv 1,._,b( Phone:
tiling Address: (
i
ysical Address: 1
i
cility Contact: tfik o(&e4,,e-I 'M 0 tr/t 5 Title: Phone: I
-6* -J_Q-e i
trite Representative: Integrator:
-
Ttified Operator: ,,6At i y
wi.
�"r Certification Number:
2e7)�
ick-up Operator:
Certification Number: 1
1
cation of Farm: • Latitude: Longitude:
i
1
:',. ''-I ii'' -44L104.14'•-4:4-tit i-41" ,:e, ir42-4,1,40:- -,r7 .;;'-'4.„ ,.Y 7443rietlAr..24;'''6,,,,:lki,4,ik;'7"t'' 4,--„,,,---, -..wr --'441--,": 10,,eg, 1
Wean to Finish 4.Dai Cow ..
MI Wean to Feeder -- In Non-La er 'M Dai Calf - il
-
-- -
�Feeder to Finish ' `�-_- 4" 0,' 1• �S Da" Heifer
Farrow to Wean 8. t y,� f Iv. D Cow :
'MI Farrow to Feeder , tom` 111 - ' °' k a ■Non-Dai
■ - Beef Stocker -
Farrow to Finish - _
''III Gilts --. 0 Non-La ers Beef Feeder
CRBoars Pullets . --�mBeefBrood Cow ~
a ■Turke Poults -- -70S L % "` ,1
' �Other �� m Other • - . _
lischarges and Stream Impacts
.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Kt-K ❑ NA ❑ NE
•
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
' a. Was the conveyance man-made? El Yes El No ®' 1A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No E 1A ❑ NE
?.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? .❑ Yes 25a ❑ NA ❑ NE
e impacts orpotential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No n NA ❑NE
3.Were there any observable adverse p P
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 •
2/4/2015 Continued

•
Facility Number: 61 - f del Date of Inspection:g(k W
Waste Collection&Treatment .
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No 7r ❑ NE
Structure 1\ Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes, ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑'�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes BPle ❑ NA ❑.NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes []-N ❑ NA ❑ NE
•(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [ 1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [ IVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑;Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn;,etc.)
❑ PAN• ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C q g - 4 P S 0
13.Soil Type(s): L 91 O W&_
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 1:5 ' ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? - ❑ Yes ❑_ ❑ NA El NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [�Nt5°' ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes pre ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents '
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [(�,vo ❑ NA LiNE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes lypc o" ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists . ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease.Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [r 1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall El Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? - ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

7�,
Facility Number: 6 2- (3 =(. !Date of Inspection: / �'�" L-a '�("
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes -0'1rr- ❑ NA ❑ NE
•
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes t].N J NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete-annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes laINC ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes E 3.Pao 0 NA ❑ NE
Other Issues � �
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ElL_Yes ,/ n NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes lal< ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facilityfail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
fY g
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. . El Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes.. No. ❑ NA El NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
--..,,_...:-:, . .(re ....._.__}_.s.. .-c-a.. ,..an_.ui.�...,..- _ .v.. _ - - -`,-"far_•.-
"_>._....., ;a"drt -iOr-r`ecami!uenilatrio 0:tian' oftliV efi,h*ntft_s rx . �_ --
Commenfs(�et~er=tgc;ueshon#) Ezglain�any��ES�ansv�ers-aa�dfoc,any=_��^.„ � � x �.� x�
V e - i gs of faci ty to�betterYegplarn sxtuafoiiA 'sddrtionai"pages asagce� ig r y.. m- atiaimigt
6,4 C✓1.4-i\v-v 6-7-l at-2e9 - 9 5 e .
3 0 141°‘-' C t4-t (t rit
1 ,
\ F
eseAL q(0 -3 0? - 8 -
i � Phone: (0-�� 3 3 34C('
Reviewer/Inspector Name: l U Uj OVVLaJ I,
�� Date: 4-4,�©�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: t) �1
Page3of3
2/4/201311