820123_Inspection_20200327

s bi 40.of Water Resources
clhty Number P -2 r 0 Division of Soil and Water ConseSrvahon � I
�a -
'17: ti' - .t - - m'DSO 64. 0 #` .6a ,� �, _ �a.v:"� /( - - .,.1
,.'A.::t,z d nP'ss-G. _ --, _ _ s ., . --J_,a 8 - , '-_ � - .'l.� d. =x
Type of Visit: ®C��om
mp/pliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: - C�1 utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:. ,Whiltair..QP Arrival Time:r I,i3 S A— Departure Time:I /A< ®a County: e)f'ill Region: 1--__Ly_
Farm Name: 3 is,cri, e r%• : -. q—i/ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Rt,0L114 1 `Z (`,d--vGv','"‘ Phone:
Mailing Address: .
Physical Address:
VI Facility Contact: ,C3y4 i' r. B ink eic, Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: << Integrator: Rd' r.-
Certified Operator: 6 . Certification Number: /1 eel
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
_ -
Design :Current „ - Des1g`n Current Desi n Current-
Swine Capacity lop .Wet Poultry-: Capacity Pop Cattle Capacity Pop
Wean to Finish Layer� Dairy Cow _
3 � Wean to Feeder Non-Layer � _ Dairy Calf
o Feeder to Finish t;c -l'it v Dairy Heifer
u Farrow to Wean ✓ e ,. , -,_Design Current Dry Cow 31,
-= Farrow to Feeder ' 3Ponit ,'.. '.Ga 1 aci Pot Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish - Beef Stocker
Gilts ` •Non-La ers �� - Beef Feeder `
Boars = u Pullets �� Beef Brood Cow
Otli.LTig_ _ ,�„ , '"` e . e -_•Turke Poults �� ', era' f 'k -
F
Other = Other '� i1 6
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0-NO— ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes ❑ No M A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑No al 11A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No �TA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No [/]'N A ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ElNo 16 NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: eA,, Date of Inspection: , -1 o(4.
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No —❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
•
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes El-No— ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes r9'V� ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes in—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): W &
13. Soil Type(s): JV o
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [L}1 o ❑ NA 0 NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes E o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes lErco ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes u 1V o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Li No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
I]Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes I N ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes niNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e - I Z3 Date of Inspection: 27 l"lt2
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ,E''lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Ej o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? - ❑ Yes ©-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Er-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
(-(
,� as ✓ egte ' od s
c
9(O- 08,- (0 5f
Reviewer/Inspector Name: c3 i l,\ 13 0,A, Phone7t d' if33 333r
P
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: CA Date:2 '^7 'k I
Page 3 of 3 !2/4/2015