820114_Inspection_20200827

1;)1Ivvt - nI)
*Division of Water Resources
Facility Number Z - "I I 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ;' Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review _0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ®'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: X74,b(r 24 Arrival Time:I f O;.ifs 'I Departure Time: /j;10 County: S,ig'/1IP300 Region:F y
Farm Name: i ki lLi g o Gt)AA, F1W Owner Email:
Owner Name: Key-yy,is\--•- 0 tor 11 f-a 50✓1 _ Phone:
Mailing Address: -
Physical Address: •
Facility Contact: cett,t l S cot( )FCI( Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: E )14A
Certified Operator: l�/l
tvi Certification Number: z-7 od,
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ' Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish '7:32-0 4F2 Z7 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder ,
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 111' TA NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No DNA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [f NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [f No ❑ NA' ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential'adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 111<lo ❑ NA n NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 2.- /j if Date of Inspection:'Z7 ' li G Z )
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No D-41-Pi ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
1
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): • 5 I 2. S ..
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes IJI ❑ NA El NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ®'No ❑ NA El NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or envir mental th at,notify DWR
CID any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ es ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? T�
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need , ❑ Yes 111,3(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12 ❑ NA El NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
El PAN El PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. El Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ;4/ 0 `4 �i g �(r O
13. Soil Type(s): OA, /1) 0 -C79
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes LJK El NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA El NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
El WUP El Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall El Stocking El Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes al< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 2 - /Pt Date of Inspection: V/ 41>Gr2J19
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑C,moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
El Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 0'14 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Q'I�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 'To ❑ NA El NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes EKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ to ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 1114 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C4,1 It ,Fl d,„, -43-1 �( Sr���,�y ��— - /q o-,CS 3,. g
537o •,f-m r�
�/ I �t; 6e- okk ,`P.s(de o sl�//,/�e
/s al,iS I'EV�b OVA, [w" �� G
Cne,,,A, Feo 0-6CS14-
e�cC 9.io -wi3 -6e
Reviewer/Inspector Name: .\ l lk ovL /J Phone:1,10 �('3 3—
6 1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L� Date: Z1 fAXr 2-r2-0
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015