20201747 Ver 1_Pre-Filing Meeting Request_20201112

ID#* 20201747
Version* 1
Regional Office* Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Reviewer List* Sue Homewood
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 11/12/2020
Contact Name* Troy King, P.E.
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Name* Cherry Lane Sanitary Sewer Outfall
Project Owner* City of Graham
Project County* Alamance
Owner Address: Street Address
201 South Main Street
Address Line 2
PO Drawer 357
aty
State / Province / Region
Graham
North Carolina
Fbstal / Zip Code
Country
27253
United States
Is this a transportation project? * r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - F 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
r- Individual Permit F Modification
r- Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes r No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Sue Homewood
Please give a brief project description below.

The project is divided into two phases and will be constructed to the
extent that funding allows. Phase I is the portion of outfall from Cherry
Lane Pump Station to Manhole #8, immediately upstream of Dosing
Siphon #1. This phase consists of 18" gravity sanitary sewer outfall,
12" gravity sanitary sewer outfall, a 10" inverted dual siphon creek
crossing, and a second creek crossing. The depth of the line at the
second creek crossing allows it to be installed without the need for an
inverted siphon. A major portion of this outfall is expected to be
installed below the rock elevation, so construction equipment
required will include large excavators, rock drills, blasting equipment,
and other equipment typical of pipeline installation where rock
blasting is required. Phase 11 is the portion of outfall that extends from
Manhole #8 to Back Creek Pump Station #1. This phase consists of
12" gravity sanitary sewer outfall, 8" gravity sanitary sewer outfall,
and an 8" inverted dual siphon creek crossing. Construction
equipment for this portion of outfall w411 be very similar to Phase 1.
Buffer impacts include areas where current forestland w411 be cleared
for permanent access easements, as well as areas that are currently
cleared but w411 require a change of use.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
D.6i. 18141 - Buffer Impacts - 11-11-20.pdf 1003.21KB
4283 Back Creek Sewer Outfall Wet
1.59MB
Report_12.13.18.pdf
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 11/12/2020

PILU
P I L❑ T E N V I R❑ N M E N T A L, I N C
December 13, 2018
Mr. Frankie Maness
City of Graham
201 South Main Street
Graham, North Carolina 27253
Reference: Wetland Delineation
Back Creek Sewer Outfall
Approximate 5,134 Linear Foot Corridor
Graham, Alamance County, North Carolina
Pilot Project 4283
Dear Mr. Maness:
Pilot Environmental, Inc. (Pilot) is pleased to submit this report of the wetland delineation for the
approximate 5,134 linear foot corridor located adjacent to Back Creek in Graham, Alamance County,
North Carolina.
Background
Wetlands are defined by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as "those areas that are inundated or saturated
by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal
circumstances, do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions." In order for an area to be classified as wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,
and wetland hydrology indicators must be present.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials
into waters of the United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters
of the United States include the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and
streams, intermittent streams, and wetlands. The EPA and the USACE jointly administer the
Section 404 program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to
approve, condition, or deny any Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.
Jurisdictional features include wetlands, open waters, ponds, lakes and perennial/intermittent
streams. Jurisdictional features are regulated by the USACE and North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources (NCDEQ-DWR). Permits are required prior
to impacting any jurisdictional feature. The type of permit required is specific to the type,
location and amount of impacts. Stormwater management plans and/or mitigation for proposed
impacts could be a requirement of the permit approval process.
PO Box 128, Kernersville, NC 27285
www. Com

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 4283
December 13, 2018
The findings and conclusions in this report are our opinions based on field conditions
encountered at the time of the site visit. Changes including, but not limited to, regulations,
weather, timber/vegetation removal and usage/development of the site or nearby properties
can alter the findings and opinions presented in this report. We recommend that this report only
be used for preliminary planning purposes. Agency verifications, followed by a survey of
jurisdictional features are required to determine the exact extent and locations of jurisdictional
features and are valid for a period of up to five years following issuance of a USACE Jurisdictional
Determination (JD) and/or NCDEQ-DWR Site Determination Letter.
Scope of Services
Pilot was contracted to perform a wetland delineation for the approximate 5,134 linear foot
corridor located 100 feet and farther from and adjacent to Back Creek (with the exception of where
it crosses Back Creek) in Graham, Alamance County, North Carolina. The scope of services included
a delineation of jurisdictional features (streams, wetlands and other surface waters) on the site.
The sewer line corridor centerline was staked in the field at the time of the delineation.
Literature Review
We reviewed the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey of Alamance County, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).
• The USGS Topographic Map (Drawing 1) depicts Back Creek crossing and adjacent to the site.
Other surface waters or wetlands are not shown on the site. Drainage swales that could contain
surface waters or wetlands are located on the site.
• The USDA Web Soil Survey of Alamance County (Drawing 2) identifies the following mapping
units on the site: Chewacla loam (ChA), Cullen clay loam (CnC2, CnD2 & CnE2), Riverview loam
(RvA) and Rowan -Poindexter Complex (RxE). The Chewacla series consists of somewhat poorly
drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on floodplains. The Cullen, Rowan and
Poindexter series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on ridges and
side slopes. The Riverview series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that occur
on floodplains. The soil mapping units are not identified on the Hydric Soils List for Alamance
County.
Pilot also reviewed the last published USDA Soil Survey of Alamance County (Drawing 2A). The
published soil survey depicts Back Creek crossing and adjacent to the site. Additionally, an
unnamed tributary to Back Creek is shown crossing the central portion of the site. Other surface
waters or wetlands are not shown on the site.
iA

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 4283
December 13, 2018
• The USFWS NWI Map (Drawing 3) depicts a riverine feature consistent with the location of Back
Creek as depicted on the USGS Topographic Map. Other streams, surface waters or wetlands
are not shown on the site.
• Pilot reviewed the FEMA FIRM (Drawing 4) for the site. The FEMA FIRM identifies the site as
being located within areas designated as regulatory floodway, the 100-year floodplain and the
500-year floodplain.
Field Delineation
Pilot conducted the site visit on November 28, 2018. Structures are not located on the site. The
site consists of wooded land and fields. Ponds are not located on the site.
Back Creek crosses and is located adjacent to the site. Back Creek ranges in width up to
approximately 50 feet wide and is a perennial stream. Additionally, streams which discharge to
Back Creek, are located on the central and southern portions of the site. These streams
contained indicators of ordinary high-water marks, well defined beds and banks and flowing
water at the time of our site visit. Based on our observations, these streams would be considered
jurisdictional by the USACE. The limits of the streams were marked in the field with blue and
white striped surveyor flagging. Back Creek and the streams located on the site are well defined
and should be located in the field by a licensed N.C. surveyor.
A linear wetland seep is located in a drainage Swale on the central portion of the site. Vegetation
is largely absent within the linear wetland. Saturation to the soil surface and presence of hydric
soils are located within the wetland. USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms, which support
our opinion, are included as attachments. The wetland boundaries were marked in the field with
red and white striped surveyor flagging.
Drawing 5 shows the approximate location of the site boundary, streams, wetland and data point
locations. Drawing 5 is subject to change during agency verification of the delineation.
Watershed Classification
According to the NCDEQ-DWR, the site is located in the Cape Fear River Basin. The NCDEQ-DWR
has classified Back Creek as WS-V, Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) in the vicinity of the site.
Additionally, the site is located within the Jordan Lake Watershed. Mandatory 50-foot vegetative
buffers are required adjacent to surface waters and streams as depicted on the most recent USGS
Topographic Map (Drawing 1) and last published USDA soil survey (Drawing 2A). Therefore, streams
designated as Streams SA and SC are subject to the Jordan Lake 50-foot vegetative buffers. The
remainder of streams located on the site are not depicted on the aforementioned data sources and
therefore are not subject to Jordan Lake 50 foot vegetative buffers.
3

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 4283
December 13, 2018
Agency Verification
The site has not been verified by the USACE or the NCDEQ-DWR. We understand that our flags
will be surveyed to determine the exact extent and location of jurisdictional features and
applicable surface water buffers. The delineation, including locations and designations of
features, is subject to change during agency verifications.
Closing
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to you. Please contact us at (336) 310-
4527 if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
r`
Bradl S. Luckey, PWS
Project Manager
7 X6*�
Michael T. Brame, PWS
Principal
Attachments: Drawing 1— USGS Topographic Map
Drawing 2 — Web Soil Map
Drawing 2A— Published Soil Map
Drawing 3 — NWI Map
Drawing 4 — FEMA FIRM
Drawing 5 — Wetland Map
Wetland Determination Data Forms
lH

fir'-' �' �_ � � k •.,94 ���1 {*' %
E ; ,
IL
V2�r I
, .•l.- - { r 3 f�,• _- y_'�'f ivy � � �I '
AOL
LEGEND
} - •x �.... f Site Boundary
Drawing 1
USGS Topographic Map
USGS Topographic Map
Back Creek Sewer Cutfall
Mebane and Burlington, -
,�,, � - Graham, Alamance County, NC
NC Quadrangles pILOTPilot Project 4283
Scale: 1" = 2,000' P I L 0 i E N V I g 0 N N E N 7 A E. I N C

E i
1 L ■ 4 � J'r•' � � � Fr1
y E `ry
4' E 11 •r;
e +•
���
7�
E _
J
E
E n�
E
B n
E
EE
E
E
e
LEGEND
F�RM to Site Boundary
Drawing 2 Web Soil Map
USDA Web Soil Survey "''r` Back Creek Sewer Outfall
of Alamance County, NC pI�1, w, Graham, Alamance County, NC
Scale: 1"—C00/ plLO11NVIRONNIENTAL.INC Pilot Project4283

Drawing 2A
USDA Soil Survey
of Alamance County, NC
Published 1960, Sheet 19
Not to Scale
PILOT W
P I L O i E N V I R 4 N M E N T A L. I N C
Published Soil Map
Back Creek Sewer Outfall
Graham, Alamance County, NC
Pilot Project 4283

Drawing 3
USFWS NWI
Wetlands Mapper
Scale: 1" = 500'
:1►Mti9F"
PILGT
P I L 0 7 E N V I R O N M E N T A L, I N[
LEGEND
— Site Boundary
Freshwater Emergent
FreshwaterForested/Shrub
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine
Freshwater Pond
Lake
Riverine
� Other �
NWI Map
Back Creek Sewer Cutfall
Graham, Alamance County, NC
Pilot Project 4283

m
Drawing 4
National Flood Hazard Layer
From FEMA Web Map Service
Scale: 1" = 500'
li
El
44.
y .1
Pk
p LEGEND
Site Boundary
1 9`oAnnual Chance Flood Hazard
PANE L OR egulatory Floodvay
08 Sped al Floodvay
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
IF61 0.29(.Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Future Conditions 1'/¢Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Area with R educed Risk Due to Levee
V;_�
f
FEMA FIRM
` Back Creek Sewer Cutfall
Graham, Alamance County, NC
Pilot Project 4283
1 LOi ENVIRONMENTAL.INC

SF
F
Proposed
J.
Sewer Line
DP-2 Q
r
WB 1-5
1 DP-1 Q
:.. SB
Sc
- t
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
WETLAND FLAGS =
STREAM FLAGS =
Stream Flags = Limits
Wetland Flags = 5
Total Flags = 5
LEGEND
Evaluation Limits
Wetland
Stream
E� SA 1-5 Flag Number/Feature ID
DP-1 Q Data Point
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP
ARE PRELIMINARY. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY
THE USACE AND/OR THE NCDEQ-DWR. THEY HAVE NOT
BEEN SURVEYED OR GEOLOCATED. A
Drawing 5 Wetland Map
Satellite Imagery from ESRI t'::'
and Pilot GPS Data I` Back Creek Sewer Outfall
,,, Graham Alamance County, NC
Scale: 1" = 400' PELT Pilot Project 4283
Date: 11.30.18 PI i E N V I R 0 N M E N T A E. I N C

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Back Creek Sewer Outfall City/County: Graham/Alamance Sampling Date: 09.28.2017
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): Brame/Luckey Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Relatively flat
Slope (%): 1-2 Lat: 36.06023 Long:-79.35209 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Cullen clay loam (CnE2) NWI Classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland. Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) _
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _
Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0"
_
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: Vegetation is largely absent within wetland. Wetland is a linear seep.

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point DP-1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. None Observed That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
2.
3. Total Number of Dominant
4 Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
5.
6 Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
7.
8. Prevalence Index worksheet:
0 = Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. None Observed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
0 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Microstegium viminea 2 Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
2 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. None Observed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
0 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is largely absent within wetland. Wetland is a linear seep.
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species X 2 =
FAC species X 3 =
FACU species X 4 =
UPL species X 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
ydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Test is <_ 3.0'
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)
or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No

SOIL
Sampling Point:
DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 7.5YR 4/4 100
Loam Fluvial material
3-18 10YR 4/2 75
7.5YR 4/6 25 C M Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (IVILRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (IVILRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Suface (S9) (IVILRA 147, 148)
(IVILRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(IVILRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
IVILRA 147, 148)
IVILRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Umbric Surface (F13) (IVILRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (IVILRA 148)
3Indicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Stripped Matrix (S6)
disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Back Creek Sewer Outfall City/County: Graham/Alamance Sampling Date: 9.28.17
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2
Investigator(s): Brame/Luckey Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Side Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Slope (%): 5 Lat: 36.060285 Long:-79.352104 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Cullen clay loam (CnE2) NWI Classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
UMMAKY OF FINDINGS — Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland. Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes _ No X
Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point DP-2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Acer rubrum
15
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
2. Liriodendron tulipifera 15 Y FAC
3. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Y FAC
4
5.
6
7.
8.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
45
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15' )
FACW species X 2 =
1. Juniperus virginiana
5
Y
FACU
FAC species X 3 =
FACU species X 4 =
2.
3.
4
UPL species X 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
6.
7.
8.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
9.
10.
5
= Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Test is <_ 3.0'
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
5' )
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1. Rubus betulifolius
10
Y
FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia
5
Y
FAC
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)
or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
g.
10.
11.
12.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
15 = Total Cover
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
1. Lonicera japonica
5
Y
FAC
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
2.
height.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
6.
5 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loam
'Tvoe: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (I -RR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (I -RR N,
IVILRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (IVILRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Suface (S9) (IVILRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions(F8)
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (I -RR N,
IVILRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (IVILRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (IVILRA 148)
Hydric Soil Present?
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (IVILRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(IVILRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(IVILRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Yes No X

PROP. 12" DIP S.S.
(B2
I � FW � Fw
1 —
\ SSMH NO. 1 FW
\ \ F1N FW
\
FIN —
\ \ FW
30 1=T PERMANENT
EASEMENT
i
i
10 FT MAINTENANCE i 10 FT TEMPORARY
CORRIDOR CENTERED CONSTRUCTION
ON SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
SECTION A -A
SEE SHEET 6 FOR BUFFER IMPACTS CALCULATIONS
NAD 83(201 1)
30 FT PERMANENT
EASEMENT
i
i
10 FT TEMPORARY 10 FT TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT SECTION B-B EASEMENT
ZONE 1 TEMPORARY SHEET NO.
alley, williams, carmen 8s king, inc. 0 BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 1 MAINTENANCE WIDE BACK CREEK - CHERRY LANE
Q CORRIDOR BUFFER IMPACT AREAS
ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS &SURVEYORS ZONE 2 TEMPORARY 1
740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179 BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 2 10' WIDE ALAMANCE COUNTY I
burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534 ZONE 2 PERMANENT MAINTENANCE GRAHAM, N.C.
Firm's Engineering License No. F-0203 BUFFER IMPACTS CORRIDOR SCALE: 1 " = 50' DATE: 7/1/19 DWG. BY WDF PROJECTNO.: 18141 OF 6

83(2O1
oo /
30 FT PERMANENT
EASEMENT
i
i
10 FT MAINTENANCE i 10 FT TEMPORARY
CORRIDOR CENTERED CONSTRUCTION
ON SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
SECTION A -A
Fw
Fw �
FW
FW
F"' -------
—
FW
iwm
18+00
BACK CREEK
- Fw FW Fw -
rw � FW ��� FW
FP
SEE SHEET 6 FOR BUFFER IMPACTS CALCULATIONS
30 FT PERMANENT
EASEMENT
i
i
10 FT TEMPORARY 10 FT TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT SECTION B-B EASEMENT
ZONE 1 TEMPORARY SHEET NO.
Q
alley, williams, carmen 8s king, inc. 0 BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 1 MAINTENA
CE WIDE BACK CREEK - CHERRY LANE
ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS &SURVEYORS ZONE 2 TEMPORARY CORRIDOR BUFFER IMPACT AREAS
740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179 BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 2 10' WIDE ALAMANCE COUNTY 2
burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534 ZONE 2 PERMANENT MAINTENANCE GRAHAM, N.C.
Firm's Engineering License No. F-0203 BUFFER IMPACTS CORRIDOR SCALE: 1 " = 50' DATE: 7/1/19 DWG. BY WDF FAOJECTNO.: 18141 OF 6

\ \ \ NC GRID NAD 83(201 1)
\ \
X-0 \ \ \
\
\1?0,s Xoo\ \ \
/01
c'F �
SSMH NO. 7
/ oo
\ BACK CREEK
Ak
W
FW
i
30 FT PERMANENT
EASEMENT
i
i
10 FT MAINTENANCE i 10 FT TEMPORARY
CORRIDOR CENTERED CONSTRUCTION
ON SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
SECTION A -A
SSMH NO. 8 ZONE 2 BUFFER
i
m / / ZONE 1 BUFFER
2k00 J� "
88
.t
P
PROP. 12" DIP S.S.
SSMH NO. 9
13
ZONE 2 BUFFER
/ ZONE 1 BUFFER //
♦�
♦ x
♦♦ fL
&§1- 2
/ 6+0o
10 25 00
SSMH NO. 8A
SEE SHEET 6 FOR BUFFER IMPACTS CALCULATIONS
/ SSMH NO. 10
30 FT PERMANENT
EASEMENT
i
i
10 FT TEMPORARY 10 FT TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT SECTION 8-8 EASEMENT
ZONE 1 TEMPORARY SHEET NO.
Q
alley, williams, carmen 8s king, inc. 0 BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 1 MAINTENA
CE WIDE BACK CREEK - CHERRY LANE
ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS &SURVEYORS ZONE 2 TEMPORARY
CORRIDOR BUFFER IMPACT AREAS
�
740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179 BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 2 10' WIDE ALAMANCE COUNTY 3
burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534 ZONE 2 PERMANENT MAINTENANCE GRAHAM, N.C.
Firm's Engineering License No. F-0203 BUFFER IMPACTS CORRIDOR SCALE: 1 " = 50' DATE: 7/1/19 DWG. BY WDF PROJECTNO.: 18141 1
OF 6

• r
BACK CRE K
rw
T
RFF��N
oo Fw 813 ------ ---
m
rp FP
FP
Z
w
N
O
SSMH NO. 11
30 FT PERMANENT
EASEMENT
i
i
10 FT MAINTENANCE i 10 FT TEMPORARY
CORRIDOR CENTERED CONSTRUCTION
ON SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
SECTION A -A
31+00
32+00
PROP. 12" DIP S.S. J
ZONE 2 BUFFER
ZONE IBUFFER
�-------
/
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
Pp
0
SEE SHEET 6 FOR BUFFER IMPACTS CALCULATIONS
SSMH NO. 12
SSMH NO. 13
B14
/I
30 FT PERMANENT
EASEMENT
i
i
10 FT TEMPORARY 10 FT TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT SECTION B-B EASEMENT
ZONE 1 TEMPORARY SHEET NO.
Q
alley, williams, carmen 8s king, inc. 0 BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 1 MAINTENA
CE WIDE BACK CREEK - CHERRY LANE
ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS &SURVEYORS ZONE 2 TEMPORARY CORRIDOR BUFFER IMPACT AREAS
740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179 BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 2 10' WIDE ALAMANCE COUNTY 4
burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534 ZONE 2 PERMANENT MAINTENANCE GRAHAM, N.C.
Firm's Engineering License No. F-0203 BUFFER IMPACTS CORRIDOR SCALE: 1 " = 50' DATE: 7/1/19 DWG. BY WDF PROJECTNO.: 18141 1
OF 6

SMH NO. 13 — — —
BACK CREEK
\ SSMH NO. 14
30 FT PERMANENT
EASEMENT
i
10 FT MAINTENANCE i ti
0 FT TEMPORARY
CORRIDOR CENTERED Oi CONSTRUCTION
ON SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
SECTION A -A
ii
PROP. 12" DIP S.S.
FP
FP kq
ZONE 1 BUFFER T ��
ZONE 2 BUFFER - g 1 g B 16 --
— — — Z10' TCE� �yy
FYI FW 42+0(J FW �o FW
41+00
30' S. S. ESM'T. �_
-----------�10'TCE�_----------
SSMH NO. 16
SSMH NO. 15
SEE SHEET 6 FOR BUFFER IMPACTS CALCULATIONS
A
30 FT PERMANENT
EASEMENT
i
i
10 FT TEMPORARY 10 FT TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT SECTION B-B EASEMENT
ZONE 1 TEMPORARY SHEET NO.
alley, williams, carmen 8, king, inc. BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 1 10 WIDE Q MAINTENANCE
BACK CREEK - CHERRY LANE CORRIDOR BUFFER IMPACT AREAS
ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS &SURVEYORS � ZONE 2 TEMPORARY
740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179 BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 2 10' WIDE ALAMANCE COUNTY 5
burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534 ZONE 2 PERMANENT MAINTENANCE GRAHAM, N.C.
Firm's Engineering License No. F-0203 BUFFER IMPACTS CORRIDOR SCALE: 1" = 50' DATE: 7/1/19 1
DWG. BY WDF PROJECT NO. : 18141 1
OF 6

SSMH NO. 'Bf `� � � � ���
FW
FW
- FW SSMH NO. 'A'
�P ZONE 2 BUFFER FW
4
ZONE 2 BUFFER ` r
ZONE 1 BUFFER
816 - -
FWD FW `
30' S.S. ESM'T.
10' TCE -
SSMH NO. 16-
-� AP PROP. 12" DIP S.S.
30 FT PERMANENT
EASEMENT
10 FT MAINTENANCE i 10 FT TEMPORARY
CORRIDOR CENTERED O CONSTRUCTION
ON SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
SECTION A -A
alley, williams, carmen 8, king, inc.
0 ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS & SURVEYORS
740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179
F pr= Burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534
Firm's Engineering License No. F-0203
_ 1 / ZONE 1 BUFFER
BACK CREEK
B18
� � I
45-1-00 ` F1V
FW
OB17
SSMH NO. 17 \
A*
30 FT PERMANENT
EASEMENT
10 FT TEMPORARY 10 FT TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT SECTION B-B EASEMENT
ZONE 1 TEMPORARY ZONE 1 10' WIDE
BUFFER IMPACTS MAINTENANCE
ZONE 2 TEMPORARY CORRIDOR
BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 2 10' WIDE
ZONE 2 PERMANENT MAINTENANCE
BUFFER IMPACTS CORRIDOR
BUFFER
IMPACT
ZONE 1 IMPACTS (SF)
ZONE 2 IMPACTS (SF)
AREAS
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
B1
355
955
210
613
B2
302
904
201
603
B3
1936
5596
B4
246
1291
B5
509
1507
B6
1115
B7
815
1834
B8
275
824
228
680
B9
305
910
204
607
B10
340
B11
13
B12
295
B13
1589
6434
B14
1264
4492
B15
112
B16
737
1742
B17
104
B18
42
152
B19
10
154
B20
92
274
TOTAL
1289
3991
7939
27652
IMPACTS TOTAL
BUFFER - ZONE 1
5,280 SF
BUFFER - ZONE 2
35,591 SF
IMPACTS REQUIRING MITIGATION
BUFFER - ZONE 1
0000
BUFFER - ZONE 2
0000
SHEET NO.
BACK CREEK - CHERRY LANE
BUFFER IMPACT AREAS 6
ALAMANCE COUNTY
GRAHAM, N.C. p
SCALE: 1 = 50' DATE : 711119 DWG. BY WDF PROJECT NO.: 1 p 14 1 OF 6