Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20201635 Ver 1_ArdreyKellSidewalkJDAttachments_20201211SITE NUMBER LATITUDE LONGITUDE COWARDIN CLASS ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF AQUATIC RESOURCE IN REVIEW AREA CLASS OF AQUATIC RESOURCE 1 (Main Wetland "A" Area)35.047034 -80.791292 PFO 0.27 Acres Non section 10 - wetland 2 (Main Wetland "B" Area)35.043400 -80.792127 PFO 0.33 Acres Non section 10 - wetland 3 (Graded Wetland Area)35.047519 -80.792573 PEM 0.01 Acres Non section 10 - wetland FIGURES FIGURE 1- SITE VICINITY FIGURE 2- USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP / USDA SOIL SURVEY FIGURE 3- POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. MAP Pro ject Review Are a SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIGURE NO. 11 " = 2,640 ' 7-27-19 4335-19-095 AR D REY KE LL R OAD SI DE WALK PROJECTARDREY KE LL R OADCHARLOTTE, MEC KLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: T:\Projects\2019\ENV\051-100\4335-19-095 Ardrey Kell Rd Sidewalk JD\GIS\1_VICINITY.mxd plotted by DHomans 07-27-20190 0.5 1 Miles SITE VICINITY ³ RE FERENCE:THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYEDARE APPROX IMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESSSTATED OTHERWISE. Ser vice Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS,Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, E sriChina (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) ChA MeB IrA MeB 2 IrB MeB W IrB DaB MeB MeB MeB MO MeD IrB IrB MeB DaB MeB IrB MeB W IrB IrB MeD MeB MeB MeB MO IrB IrB MeB MeB IrB MeB IrB MeB DaBIrB IrAIrA IrB IrA MeB W MeB MeB W MeB MeB IrB IrB MeB IrB IrA IrB IrA IrB IrA IrA Pro ject Review Are a USDA Soil Type s IrA: Iredell fine sandy loam , 0-1 % s lopesIrB: Iredell fine sandy loam , 1-8 % s lopesMeB: Meck lenburg fine sa ndy loam , 2-8 % s lopes SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIGURE NO. 21 " = 968 ' 7-27-19Drawing Path: T:\Projects\2019\ENV\051-100\4335-19-095 Ardrey Kell Rd Sidewalk JD\GIS\2_TOPO.mxd plotted by DHomans 07-27-20190 1,000 2,000(FE ET) US GS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP /US DA SOIL SURVE Y ³ RE FERENCE: REFERENCE: 198 8 WEDDINGTON [NC,SC] USGS 1:24,000 QUADSHEET / USDA SSURGO DATA FOR MECKLEN BURG COUNTYTHIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED A RE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEYINFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. Ser vice Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 Na tiona lGeographic Society, i-cubed 4335-19-095 AR D REY KE LL R OAD SI DE WALK PROJECTARDREY KE LL R OADCHARLOTTE, MEC KLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA !.!.!.P!%P!%P!%P!%P!%P!%MAI N WETLAND "A" AREAForested Wetland0.27 acres in Project Area MAI N WETLAND "B" AREA0.33 acres Forested Wetland MAI N WETLAND "B" AREAForested Wetland0.33 acres in Project Area GRADED WETLAND AREAEmergent Wetland0.01 acres in Project AreaFuture Bryant Farms Rd ROWOldPrairieRdHaddonfieldPlBryant Farms RdAlhambra Ln ColonialCountryLn ColonialCountryLn Three Lakes D rBlue Junction Rd WicklowB rookC tOldTayportPlHorseplay CtHumboldtDr Tom Short Rd TomShortRd Tom Short Rd C o n g re s s i o n a l Club DrSouthCreekRdArdrey Kell Rd Ardrey Kell Rd DP-1 UP-1 DP-2 1 3 2 4 5 6 meckco Pro ject Review Area P!%Photo Locations / Orientatio n Potential Wetland (July 2019 Delienatio n) !.Wetland D etermina tion Form L ocations Previously Delineated Wetland Bo und aries Culverts Hy rologic Co nnections Estimated Off-Site Wetland Boundaries 1-fo ot Conto urs (Derived fro m 2017 LiDAR da ta) SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIGURE NO.3 1 " = 200 ' 7-31-19 4335-19-095ARDREY KELL ROAD SIDEWALK PROJECTARDREY KELL ROADCHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: \\charnc\Active\Projects\2019\ENV\051-100\4335-19-095 Ardrey Kell Rd Sidewalk JD\GIS\3_waters.mxd plotted by DHomans 07-31-20190 200 400 (FEET)POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. MAP³REFERENCE: 2018 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHGIS BASE L AYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM MECK LENBURG COUNTY. THIS MAP IS FORINFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED.THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. NOTE:POTENTIAL W ET LANDS WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY D. HOMANS OF S &ME ON JULY 17AND 19, 2019. PREVIOUSLY DELIENATED WETL AND BOUNDARIES WERE ESTIMATED FROM FL ATBRANCH NATURE PRESERVE DESIGNS FROM AND AN S&M E FIELD DELINEATION. WETLANDBOUNDARIES WERE DETERMINED WITH GPS EQUI MENT CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY. THEYHAVE NOT BEEN VERI FIED BY THE USACE OR SU RVEYED BY A REGIS TERED L AND SURVEYOR.PREVIOUSLY DELI NEATED WETLAND B OU NDARIES WERE DERIVED FROM FLAT BRANCH NATU REPRESERVE PROJECT A-JD (SAW-2015-01094) AND TOM S HORT ROAD SIDE WALK PROJECT P-JD (S AW-2016-01265). ESTIM ATED OFF-SITE WETLAND B OU NDARIES WERE DETERMINED VIA TOPOGRAPHY. FIELD PHOTOGRAPHS Ardrey Kell Road Sidewalk Project Ardrey Kell Road Charlotte, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 4335-19-095 7/17/2019 Photographer: Dave Homans 1 Location / Orientation At entrance boardwalk to Flat Branch Nature Preserve, looking south. Remarks View of Main Wetland in the vicinity of the DP-1 data point. ` 7/17/2019 Photographer: Dave Homans 2 Location / Orientation Within future Bryant Farms Road right of way, looking east. Remarks View of ditched portion of Main Wetland. Ardrey Kell Road Sidewalk Project Ardrey Kell Road Charlotte, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 4335-19-095 7/17/2019 Photographer: Dave Homans 3 Location / Orientation Adjacent to Ardrey Kell Road, looking northeast. Remarks View of culvert outfall in ditched section of Main Wetland. 7/17/2019 Photographer: Dave Homans 4 Location / Orientation Within future Bryant Farms Road right of way, looking southwest. Remarks View of typical wooded upland conditions over much of the project review area. Ardrey Kell Road Sidewalk Project Ardrey Kell Road Charlotte, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 4335-19-095 7/17/2019 Photographer: Dave Homans 5 Location / Orientation Along Ardrey Kell Road, looking southwest Remarks View of typical upland roadside edge. 7/19/2019 Photographer: Dave Homans 6 Location / Orientation Within future Bryant Farms Road right of way, looking northeast. Remarks View of graded potential wetland area (DP-2). USACE WETLAND DETERMINATION FORMS Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long: Soil Map Unit Name: X Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X Are Vegetation , Soil X , or Hydrology X SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. X No X No X X No X X X X X Yes X Yes X Yes X X U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Wetland Hydrology Present? Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) NoYes No No Water Table Present? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: True Aquatic Plants (B14) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Wetland boundary difficult to determine due to dark parent soils and limited topographic variation. As is typical of Iredell soils, a tight clay layer has restricted infiltration leading to surface saturation during wet seasons and limited groundwater infiltration from below. Two sections ("A" Area and "B" Area) were delineated of the same general wetland complex exibiting similar hyrology, soils and vegetation. HYDROLOGY Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron Deposits (B5) City/County:Ardrey Kell Sidewalk Project Charlotte / Mecklenburg DP-1 7/17/2019 CDOT / CSWS NC No Section, Township, Range:David Homans, S&ME Inc. 1%noneBasin / Flat Datum:-80.79129235.047034LRR P, MLRA 136 PFONWI classification:Iredell fine sandy loam Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none): Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.) significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Remarks: Is the Sampled AreaYes Yes Yes Hydric Soil Present? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Nowithin a Wetland?Yes Ditching has occurred around the northern edge of the wetland and along portions of Ardrey Kell Road. Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Remarks: Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 10 Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): No Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Surface Water Present? Field Observations: ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 = 1.x 3 = 2.x 4 = 3.x 5 = 4.Column Totals:(B) 5. 6. 7. 8.X 9. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 50% of total cover:20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X3 =Total Cover5 5 Yes FAC Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) )5 =Total Cover FACWYes 1 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants. 45 18 10 5 No FACU Yes Yes FAC FAC Multiply by: Prevalence Index = B/A = Prevalence Index worksheet: FACW Total % Cover of: (A) (B) (A) 25 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? =Total Cover Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 30 ) Campsis radicans 10 Elymus virginicus 10 Tree Stratum ) =Total Cover Quercus phellos Ulmus rubra Fraxinus pennsylvanica Juniperus virginiana 30 ) 90 Indicator Status 55 20 No Dominant Species? OBL species FACW species FAC species Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Absolute % Cover 100.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) No DP-1 4 4 FACU species UPL species Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 X X Depth (inches):X Sampling Point: Yes Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Type: Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Loc2 90 Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey 100 Color (moist) Matrix C10YR 3/1 10YR 2/2 10YR 3/66-16 0-6 DP-1SOIL Type1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist)Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. % Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Redox (S5) % PL10 Texture Prominent redox concentrations Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136) Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) No Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Redox Depressions (F8) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long: Soil Map Unit Name: X Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology X Yes X Are Vegetation , Soil X , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. X No X No X X No X X X X Yes X Yes X Yes X X U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Wetland Hydrology Present? Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) NoYes No No Water Table Present? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: True Aquatic Plants (B14) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Topography appears to have been altered as a part of recent grading work; appears to have been graded as a sediment/stormwater basin, though work may have been in a former wetland area. HYDROLOGY Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron Deposits (B5) City/County:Ardrey Kell Sidewalk Project Charlotte / Mecklenburg DP-1 7/19/2019 CDOT / CSWS NC No Section, Township, Range:David Homans, S&ME Inc. 1%concaveexcavated basis Datum:-80.79257335.047519LRR P, MLRA 136 PMENWI classification:Iredell fine sandy loam Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none): Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.) significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Remarks: Is the Sampled AreaYes Yes Yes Hydric Soil Present? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Nowithin a Wetland?Yes Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Remarks: Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 10 0 Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): No Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Surface Water Present? Field Observations: ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 = 1.x 3 = 2.x 4 = 3.x 5 = 4.Column Totals:(B) 5. 6. 7. 8.X 9. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 50% of total cover:20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) )5 =Total Cover FACW OBL Yes 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants. Multiply by: Prevalence Index = B/A = Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: (A) (B) (A) 1845 15 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? =Total Cover Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 30 ) 90 Yes45Carex lurida Juncus effusus 45 Tree Stratum ) =Total Cover 30 ) Indicator Status Dominant Species? OBL species FACW species FAC species Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Absolute % Cover 100.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) No DP-1 2 2 FACU species UPL species Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 X X Depth (inches):X Sampling Point: Yes Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Type: Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Loc2 Loamy/Clayey85C Color (moist) Matrix 10YR 3/2 10YR 3/60-12 DP-1SOIL Type1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist)Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. % Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Redox (S5) % Prominent redox concentrations Texture 15 PL Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136) Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) No Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Redox Depressions (F8) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long: Soil Map Unit Name: X Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X Are Vegetation , Soil X , or Hydrology X SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. No X No X X No X Yes X Yes X Yes X X U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Wetland Hydrology Present? Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) NoYes No No Water Table Present? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: True Aquatic Plants (B14) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Wetland boundary difficult to determine due to dark parent soils and limited topographic variation. As is typical of Iredell soils, a tight clay layer has restricted surface infiltration and limited groundwater infiltration from below. HYDROLOGY Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron Deposits (B5) City/County:Ardrey Kell Sidewalk Project Charlotte / Mecklenburg UP-1 7/17/2019 CDOT / CSWS NC No Section, Township, Range:David Homans, S&ME Inc. 1%noneFlat Datum:-80.79004135.046422LRR P, MLRA 136 NWI classification:Iredell fine sandy loam Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none): Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.) significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Remarks: Is the Sampled AreaYes Yes Yes Hydric Soil Present? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Nowithin a Wetland?Yes Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Remarks: Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): No Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Surface Water Present? Field Observations: ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 = 1.x 3 = 2.x 4 = 3.x 5 = 4.Column Totals:(B) 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 50% of total cover:20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) )5 =Total Cover FACU FACU Yes 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants. 48 19 20 0 Yes Yes FAC FACU 135 0 260 Multiply by: 40 3.35Prevalence Index = B/A = 20 Prevalence Index worksheet: FACW Total % Cover of: 45 65 (A) (B) (A) 4 38 10 15 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? =Total Cover Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 30 ) 20 Yes5 15 Apocynum cannabinum Polystichum acrostichoides 15 15 Ulmus rubra Tree Stratum ) =Total Cover Juniperus virginiana Ulmus rubra Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 ) 95 Indicator Status 45 30 Yes Dominant Species? Yes FAC OBL species FACW species FAC species Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Absolute % Cover 50.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) No UP-1 3 6 FACU species UPL species Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 435 0 130 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 Depth (inches):X Sampling Point: Yes Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Type: Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Loc2 Loamy/Clayey100 Color (moist) Matrix 10YR 3/30-16 UP-1SOIL Type1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist)Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. % Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Redox (S5) %Texture Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136) Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) No Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Redox Depressions (F8) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0