20190827 Ver 1_CAMA Application_20190621

yW,�S�`A-PPw`
UI
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER JAMES H.TROGDON,III
GOVERNOR
SECRETARY
June 20,2019
Greg Daisey
Coastal Management—Transportation Projects
NCDEQ
DCM—Elizabeth City
401 S.Griffin Street, Suite 300
Elizabeth City,NC 27909
Mr. Daisey,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation(NCDOT)Ferry Division is requesting a major
modification of CAMA Permit 224-87 for shoreline stabilization at the Hatteras Southdock Ferry
Terminal in Ocracoke NC. A Declaration of Emergency was issued on March 13,2019 because of
the significant damage incurred to the ferry basin bulkhead and stacking lanes due to erosion.The
northern shoreline is actively scouring and requires stabilizing before the paved stacking lanes and
protective dunes are destroyed. If continued erosion were to cause the existing bulkhead to fail, the
entire basin would be impacted causing unsafe conditions for the loading and unloading of the
travelling public.
In previous years the north end of the island was permitted to re-nourish the beach adjacent to the
hairpin turn. This semi-regular nourishment worked for many years but stopped being a viable
option after storms significantly altered the inlet and the replenished shoreline began eroding away
in as little as several weeks. In December of 2018 sandbags were installed around the perimeter of
the stacking lanes as an effort to protect the lanes from collapsing into the sound but by Spring of
2019 most of the sandbags had been washed away and the asphalt had begun to crumble into the
sound.
1000 feet of micropoxy 646 coated steel sheet pile is to be installed from the southeast corner of
the active ferry basin,where an existing,dilapidated seawall exists,to a point north of asphalt
stacking lanes. The seawall will be installed in front of an existing steel sheet pile seawall on the
south side of the site within the ferry basin and then wrap around the north side running parallel to
Hatteras Inlet.The basin and sound-side seawalls will be anchored together with galvanized tie
rods and reinforced concrete caps that serve as wales. The site will require excavation and
earthwork to install the tie rods and reinforced concrete seawall cap. The top 3 feet of existing
sheet pile on the basin side will need to be removed to allow for the installation of tie-backs for the
new seawall. A grout closure column will be installed at the south intersection of the new and
existing seawalls to provide closure and prevent loss of fill material. Sand fill will be transported
Mailing Address: Telephone:[phone]
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
NCDOT PERRY DIVISION
]59 Lt1CM1 LANE Website:www.nedot,gov
POWELLS POINT.NC 27948

from the dredge spoil site located on the other side of the ferry basin and be placed between the •
new and existing steel sheet pile.The sound-side seawall will extend along the north side of the
Ferry Terminal peninsula and partially extend around the north end of the vehicular stacking lanes
without intruding on the inlet hazard area.The seawall at the stacking lanes will be anchored back
to a buried steel sheet pile deadman with a galvanized double steel channel wale assembly.A crane
will be used to drive the sheet piles with a vibratory hammer from the land. Existing dune and
material will be temporarily removed to allow crane access to install sheet pile wall. Material will
be stockpiled in the middle of the stacking lanes with proper erosion control devices.After
complete installation of the seawall the site would be filled and regraded with sand from the dredge
spoil site to match the existing dune elevations and reseeded with proper beach vegetation.
As depicted in the drawings,the NCDOT Ferry Division would like to install temporary sandbags
on the end of the sheet pile wall until the groin project is completed. The sandbags are needed to
prevent any erosion from occurring from easterly winds. NCDOT proposes to use 3 different sizes
of sandbags to fill in the end of the wall to prevent erosion;2'X5'Xl5',3'X3',and 4'X4' sizes
would be utilized. The different sized sand bags will be used jointly to seal off the end as depicted
in the drawings.The approximate number of sand bags is 40,depending on the depths at the time
of placement.The approximate length at the top of the sandbag wall would be 50' with a width of
15',height of 14'and the bottom tapering with elevation.The tie backs would be installed over top
of the sandbag wall. The sandbags would be placed in an area located partially within the inlet
hazard area.
Please use WBS# 15401.1048012 for any applicable fees. A hard copy of this letter will be mailed
to your office in Elizabeth City,NC.
If you have any questions or need any additional information,please contact me.
Sincerely,
e4j
Brian Doliber
Environmental Specialist
Ferry Division
252 232 8025 mobile
252 621 6251 office
bcdo l i [e-mail]
159 Lucinda Lane
Powells Point,NC 27966

0611 MP-1
APPLICATION for
Maier Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/Landowner Information
Business Name Project Name(if applicable)
No Dot Southdock Shoreline Stabilization Emergency
Applicant 1: First Name MI Last Name
Brian C Doliber
Applicant 2: First Name MI Last Name
If additional applicants,please attach an additional page(s)with names listed.
Mailing Address P4 Box City State
159 Lucinda Lane Powells Point NC
ZIP Country Phone No. FAX No.
27923 USA 252-232-8025 ext. -
Street Address(if different from above) City State ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
No Dot
Agent/Contractor 1: First Name MI Last Name
Brian C Doliber
Agent/Contractor 2: First Name MI Last Name
Mailing Address P©Box !City State
159 Lucinda Lane Powells Point NC
ZIP Phone No. 1 Phone No. 2
27966 252-232-8025 ext. - - ext.
FAX No. Contractor#
Street Address(if different from above) City State ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
Form continues on back>
x 2iUb • 1-888.4RCOA5T v Arw o :..

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 5) APPLICATION for
•
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location •
County(can be multiple) Street Address State Rd.#
Hyde 1380 Irvin Garrish Highway
Subdivision Name City State Zip
Ocracoke NC 27960-
Phone No. Lot No.(s) (if many,attach additional page with list)
ext.
a. In which NC river basin is the project located? b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Pamlico Tar Pamlico Sound
c. Is the water body identified in(b)above,natural or manmade? d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
*Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown Pamlico Sound
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction? f. If applicable,list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes No work fails within.
N/A
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract(ft) b. Size of entire tract(sq.ft.)
956 106572
c. Size of individual lot(s) d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW(normal high water)or
N W L(normal water level)
(if many lot sizes,please attach additional page with a list) 5 ®NHW or❑NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Yes.Grasses and low lying shrubbery
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
Bulkheaded land adjacent to ferry basin.Asphalt stacking lanes for ferry vehicle traffic.
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
A NC DOT ferry terminal is located directly adjacent to the project site.The terminal includes the ferry basin,small buildings,
a restroom facility,and asphalt driving lanes.
h. How does local government zone the tract? i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
NPS land (Attach zoning compliance certificate,if applicable)
®Yes ❑No DNA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? Oyes No
k. Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes,attach a copy. ®Yes ❑No DNA
If yes,by whom? NC DOT Environmental Analysis
Unit
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a Oyes NO DNA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 5) APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? Dyes No
(ii)Are there coastal wetlands on the site? DYes No
(iii)If yes to either(I)or(ii)above,has a delineation been conducted? ❑Yes ❑No
(Attach documentation,if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
N/A
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Wilt the project be for commercial,public,or private use? ['Commercial ®Public/Government
❑Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose,use,and daily operations of the project when complete.
The primary purpose of this project is to protect the ferry basin.The sheet pile wall is also expected to help protect the area
near the stacking lanes but the future groin project will address erosion in that area in more depth based on information
currently being compiled through sampling, surveying and engineering.
A shifting channel to the north of the ferry basin and vehide stacking lanes has caused significant erosion to take place on
the north end of the island.This erosion has compromised the integrity of the ferry basin bulkhead and rendered the vehicle
stacking lanes unusable while also creating a public safety issue. If the bulkhead were to fail it would impact the entire basin
and significantly affect residents and visitors alike. By installing a new sheet pile wall on both the basin and sound sides of
the point,the basin would be protected and the erosion along the stacking lane area would be mitigated.
A Declaration of Emergency was issued on March 13,2019 because of the significant damage incurred to the ferry basin
bulkhead and stacking lanes due to erosion.The northern shoreline is actively scouring and requires stabilizing before the
paved stacking lanes and protective dunes are destroyed.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology,types of construction equipment to be used during construction,the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
In order to begin installing the sheet pile the undisturbed land between the basin and the sound will need to be graded so that
a crane can move along the point. 1000 feet of micropoxy 646 coated steel sheet pile is to be installed from the southeast
corner of the active ferry basin,where an existing,dilapidated seawall exists,to a point north of asphalt stacking lanes.The
seawall will be installed in front of an existing steel sheet pile seawall on the south side of the site within the ferry basin and
then wrap around the north side running parallel to Hatteras Inlet.The basin and sound-side seawalls will be anchored
together with galvanized tie rods and reinforced concrete caps that serve as wales. The site will require excavation and
earthwork to install the tie rods and reinforced concrete seawall cap.The existing seawall on the basin side requires partial
demolition to allow installation of the new seawall.A grout closure column will be installed at the south intersection of the
new and existing seawalls to provide closure and prevent loss of fill material. Sand fill will be transported from the dredge
spoil site located on the other side of the ferry basin and be placed between the new and existing steel sheet piles_The
sound-side seawall will extend along the north side of the Ferry Terminal peninsula and partially extend around the north end
of the vehicular stacking lanes without intruding on the inlet hazard area.The seawall at the stacking lanes will be anchored
back to a buried steel sheet pile deadman with a galvanized double steel channel wale assembly.After complete installation
of the seawall the site shall be filled and regraded with sand from the dredge spoil site to match the existing dune elevations.
The open end of the seawall to the north of the stacking lanes is to be"filled in"with sand bags to prevent the potential future
erosion.A variety sand bag sizes will be used.The dimensions and placement locations can be found in the attached
drawings.The sandbags would be placed in an area located partially within the inlet hazard area.
Equipment:Crane,Tug barge,Bulldozer,any other equipment deemed necessary by the contractor.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Installation of sheet pile

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 5) APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
•
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project,new work,or both? New
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 106572 ®Sq.Fl or❑Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement,public
accesswa or other area Dyes
No ❑NA!ha!the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
There are no discharges and will continue to be no discharges
I. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes No DNA
If yes,will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? Dyes ❑No ONA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? Oyes ❑No ®NA
If yes,attach a mitigation proposal
<Form continues on backs
6. Additional Information
in addition oto is completed application form,(MP-1)the following items below,if applicable,must be submitted in order for the application
complete.package Items(a)--(t)am always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate,dated work plat(including plan view and cross-sectional drawings)drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work,clearly indicate on maps,plats,drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed(with state application only)or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront(riparian)landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers.permittee,and issuing dates.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form,if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation,if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront end inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C.Environmental Policy Act(N.C.G.S.113A 1-10),if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands,attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 5 of 5) APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant,and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date 06/a'tO/Q.o Print Name 6rZan Dot be,C
Signature eley-/iffiVa%V.
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
pDCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information

Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL •
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
Access
Channel Other
(NLW or Canal Boat Basin Boat Ramp Rock Groin Rock (excluding
NWL) Breakwater shoreline
Length stabilization)
Width
Avg. Existing
Depth NA NA
Final Project
Qepth NA NA
1. EXCAVATION ®This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
c. (i)Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh d. High-ground excavation in cubic yards.
(CW),submerged aquatic vegetation(SAV),shell bottom(SB),
or other wetlands(WL)? If any boxes are checked,provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑sB
OWL ❑None
(ii)Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ®This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
c. (i)Do you claim title to disposal area? d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes ❑No DNA ❑Yes ONo DNA
(ii)If no,attach a letter granting permission from the owner. (ii)If yes,where?
e. (I)Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh f. (I)Does the disposal include any area in the water?
(CW),submerged aquatic vegetation(SAV),shell bottom(SB), Oyes ❑No DNA
or other wetlands(WI)? If any boxes are checked,provide the
number of square feet affected. (ii)If yes,how much water area is affected?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑Ss
OWL ❑None -
(ii)Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:

3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ❑This section not applicable
(lf development is a wood groin, use MP-4—Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization: b. Length: 1000'
®Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill [Other: Width:
c. Average distance wateiward of NNW or NWL: 10 d. Maximum distance watetward of NHW or NWL: 40
e. Type of stabilization material: f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
Micropoxy 646 coated sheet pile months?
®Yes ['No DNA
(ii)If yes,state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
Information.
Significant erosion-Over 70'of shoreline has been lost within
the past year due to erosion
Source:Photographs and imagery
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level. h. Type of fill material.
Bulkhead backfill 3000 cubic yards Riprap NA Sand
Breakwater/Sill NA Other NA
i. Source of fill material.
Dredge spoil site located adjacent to the ferry basin
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ®This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (I) Will fill material be brought to the site? ❑Yes ❑Na DNA b. (i)Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh(CW),
If yes, submerged aquatic vegetation(SAV),shell bottom(SB),or
(ID Amount of material t0 be placed in the water 0 other wetlands(WL)? If any boxes are checked,provide the
number of square feet affected.
(iii)Dimensions of fill area ❑Cyy ❑SAV LISB
(iv)Purpose of fill OWL ❑None
(ii)Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used(e.g.,dragline,
controlled? backhoe,or hydraulic dredge)?
All material that is excavated will go to the dredge spoil site located Crane,tug barge,excavator,bulldozer,any other equipment
on the opposite side of the ferry basin.All material that is to be deemed necessary by the contractor.
used as fill will come from the dredge spoil site located on the
opposite side of the ferry basin
As depicted in the drawings,the NCDOT Ferry Division would like
to install temporary sandbags on the end of the sheet pile wall
until the groin project is completed. The sandbags are needed
to prevent any erosion from occurring from easterly winds.
NCDOT proposes to use 3 different sizes of sandbags to fill in
the end of the wall to prevent erosion;2'X5'X15',3'X3',and
4'X4'sizes would be utilized. The different sized sand bags will
be used jointly to seal off the end as depicted in the drawings.
The approximate number of sand bags is 40,depending on the
depths at the time of placement.The approximate length at the
lop of the sandbag wail would be 50'with a width of 15',height
of 14'and the bottom tapering with elevation.The sandbags
would be placed in an area located partially within the inlet
hazard area.

c. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project? d. (I) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
❑Yes ®No DNA site? ❑Yes ►_+No DNA
(ii)If yes,explain what type and how they will be implemented. (ii)If yes,explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
NA environmental impacts.
NA
oc/ao/9.ol0t
Date
301rfit&aeK or i1 i e s#b►b,1•-4.a i-ro4 Bir►a r eeici
Project Name .'
r;
� o►tl Pv1,1ze,T'
Appli nt Name
Applicant Sign ure

OCEAN HAZARD AEC NOTICE
Project is in an: Ocean Erodible Area High Hazard Flood Area TX._._ Inlet Hazard Area
Property Owner: Na4 Z o ail I Par K AGry:cp.
Property Address: 13 5 Cj S ev:n star:5/n 1V)we y OO re.r e K,v, (l L a 7 t GO
Date Lot Was Platted: NIA J
This notice is intended to make you,the applicant, aware of the SPECIAL NOTE: This hazard notice is required for
special risks and conditions associated with development in this development in areas subject to sudden and massive storms and
area, which is subject to natural Hazards such as storms, erosion erosion. Permits issued for development in this area expire on
and currents. The rules of the Coastal Resources Commission December 3I of the third year following the year in which the
require that you receive an AEC Hazard Notice and acknowledge permit was issued.Shortly before work begins on the project site.
that notice in writing before a permit for development can be the Local Permit Officer must be contacted to determine the
issued. vegetation line and setback distance at your site. If the property
has seen little change since the time of permit issuance, and the
The Commission's rules on building standards. oceanfront proposed development can still meet the setback requirement,the
setbacks and dune alterations are designed to minimize. but nut LPO will inform you that you may begin work. Substantial
eliminate, property loss from hazards. By granting permits. the progress on the project must be made within 60 days of this
Coastal Resources Commission does not guarantee the safety of setback determination,or the setback must be re-measured.Also,
the development and assumes no liability for future damage to the the occurrence ofa major shoreline change as the result of a storm
development. Permits issued in the Ocean Hazard Area of within the 60-day period will necessitate re-measurement of the
Environmental Concern include the condition that structures be setback. It is important that you check with the LPO before the
relocated or dismantled if they become imminently threatened by permit expires for official approval to continue the work after the
changes in shoreline configuration. The structure(s) must be permit has expired. Generally, if foundation pilings have been
relocated or dismantled within two (2) years of becoming placed and substantial progress is continuing,permit renewal can
imminently threatened, and in any case upon its collapse or be authorized. Jr is unlawful to continue work after permit
subsidence. expiration.
The best available information,as accepted by the Coastal For more information,contact:
Resources Commission, indicates that the annual long-term
average ocean erosion rate for the area where your property is Greg Daisey
located is ___.f t feet per year.
Local Permit Officer
The rate was established by careful analysis of aerial photographs
of the coastline taken over the past 50 years. 401 S. Griffin St., Suite 300; Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Studies also indicate that the shoreline could move as much as Address
5+ feet landward in a major storm.
DCM—Elizabeth City Office
The flood waters in a major storm are predicted to be about
t + feet deep in this area. Locality
Preferred oceanfront protection measures are beach nourishment [phone]; EXT.249
and relocation of threatened structures. Hard erosion control
structures such as bulkheads,seawalls,revetments,groins,jetties Phone Number
and breakwaters are prohibited. Temporary sand bags may he
authorized under certain conditions.
The applicant must acknowledge this information and
requirements by signing this notice in the space below. Without
the proper signature,the application will not be complete.
44/AVII7 000611
Applicant Signature Date
Revised May 2010

BEFORE YOU BUILD
Setting Back for Safety: A Guide to Wise Development Along the Oceanfront
When you build along the oceanfont,you take a calculated risk. The beachfront is an ever-changing land form. The beach and the
Natural forces of water and wind :ollide with tons of force,even dunes are natural "shock absorbers," taking the beating of the
on calm days. wind and waves and protecting the inland areas. By incorporating
building setbacks into the regulations,you have a good chance of
Man-made structures cannot be gtaranteed to survive the force of enjoying the full life of the structure. At first, it seems very
a hurricane. Long-term erosion (cr barrier island migration)may inviting to build your dream house as close to the beach as
take from two to ten feet of the teach each year, and, sooner or possible,but in five years you could find the dream has become a
later, will threaten oceanfront strictures. These are the facts of nightmare as high tides and storm tides threaten your investment.
life for oceanfront property owners.
The Exception
The Coastal Resources Commission(CRC)has adopted rules for The Coastal Resources Commission recognized that these rules,
building along the oceanfront. The rules are intended to avoid an initially passed in June 1979, might prove a hardship for some
unreasonable risk to life and property, and to limit public and property owners. Therefore,they established an exception for lots
private losses from storm and long-term erosion. These rules that cannot meet the setback requirement. The exception allows
lessen but do not eliminate the element of risk in oceanfront buildings in front of the current setback, if the following
development. conditions apply:
As you consider building along :he oceanfront, the CRC wants 1) the lot must have been platted as of June 1, 1979,and is
you to understand the rules and the risks. With this knowledge, not capable of being enlarged by combining with
you can make a more informed decision about where and how to adjoining land under the same ownership;
build in the coastal area. 2) development must be constructed as far back on the
property as possible and in no case less than 60 feet
The Rules landward of the vegetation line;
When you build along the oceanfront, coastal management rules 3) no development can lake place on the frontal dune;
require that the structure be sited to fit safely into the beach 4) special construction standards on piling depth and
environment. square footage must be met;and
5) all other CAMA, state and local regulations must be
Structures along the oceanfront,less than 5,000 square feet in size, met.
must be behind the frontal dune, landward of the crest of the
primary dune, and set back from the first line of stable natural The exception is not available in the Inlet Hazard Area.
vegetation a distance equal to 30 times the annual erosion rate(a
minimum of 60 feet).The setback calculation increases as the size To determine eligibility For the exception the Local Permit
of the structure increases [15A NCAC 71-1.0306(a)(2)j. For Officer will make these measurements and observations:
example:A structure between 500 and 10,000 square feet would
require a setback from the first line of stable. natural vegetation required setback from vegetation line
to a distance equal to 60 times the annual erosion rate(a minimum
of 120 feet).The graduated setback continues to increase through exception setback(maximum feasible)
structure sizes greater than 100,0)0 square feet.
rear property line setback
max.allowable square footage on lowest floor
rLtt4}tt FEU--.
SrKu1i IRE -._ / PRE stt►Ft6A H..EA>_Ft,' i 1 •t r
ADEQUATE , .— POST STORhI EL st II PROF ILE
'iGiEFa[:h oNE Y CAR Art FFt ST(AMINLACM kU UILt?ENet,
The Reasons
After the storm, the,'louse on the dune will be gone. The other house has a much better chance of survival.

'' -
'i 51 '110.4 le-
: 3i
U 4- 11W k
c1 a cAl I
1 1 7t*'/VO
44.
0 i
.-"- --_____-------___,
z :4-
al 1
--''''---- -t.41.. '3 g `8 CI i 1 ,
La 1-4 4
—, , a.
0 ,, ,_ t t
TC $ E! I ,- .7,
u3 a ,, .0‘iril
i§ /
......•------------- .... s...___.
2,
7
-..,_._
-•-..__...
......_.... 4
--_,
di ,,N., ,....• 7
„.......... 3.4, .4.,,,,,,,,. ...___.
-,....,....
-__
,i-=-•-•-•=-.1.•.-': , ,\•
11
---,
---..„....,,
—ri
.,. li. _ ----_..._............ ... ... . .. .. ... .. .... ... .•N
IN-i-
,lle
:
l!.P. \\,,,'1,11h.‘
, tov
,1/4.4., 4 ..\\
"3 . -"e7 • N''.
,.:'414 --.... • , 1
1111t1
'It i twit orazwa ....._ I
...„:,,,,,:: ,, ---
•, --
-_.....
-- I i
.1---il Q ' •I - ,;
a i%N
\;17 t_Y r\,-I.- - • "
LP
1.... .. .3. i „
7 IZ. i
t• _ 4 .4
; b'4'T •
l, k ' •, '„ -, ./. CI Z •
c,, •
' ,..„
I; -•*' CI
4
.
... 41
/`
f
I I
,,,,:, /
/
11 I.8 _- l.„._-_
Z
x 4
R 4
• i
2 1
_.) k re
g
N.
2 7 7 --c- - g
Ei. (II g .- / .\\\N 0 • 1
, i j

#16.2\cl
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER JAM ES H,TROGDON,111
Oolvt'RNoR SECRETARY
DATE: March 13.2019
TO: File
FROM: T. M. Little. P.E.
Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Declaration of Emergency
Southdock-Ocracoke
Immediate attention has been requested to repair Southdock at Ocracoke due to rapidly
increasing erosion. The ferry basin bulkhead and stacking lanes have incurred significant
damage to the pavement. If continued erosion were to cause the existing bulkhead to fail,
the entire basin would be impacted.
Due to the impacts of these failures,I have delcared an emergency exists and determined
it is not feasable nor in the public's interest, for the Department of Transportation to
comply with l:he statutory bidding requirements in obtaining materials, equipment and/or
Contractors assistance in our efforts to restore these structures. This is being done
pursuant to the authority granted by G.S. 136-28.1(e).
Instruction has been given to the Division 1 Engineer to immediately proceed to
accomplish necessary repairs.
TML/ajs
cc: James II. Trogdon, PE, Secretary of Transportation
Jerry Jennings, P.E., Division Engineer
John Rouse,P.E., Western Deputy Chief Engineer
Ron Hancock, P.E.,Deputy Chief Engineer
Patrick Norman, P.E., Director of Highway Operations
Kim Padfield, Director of Accounting Operations& Budget
Joni R.ohhins. Procurement Director
1 krlltrrg.fddres,r I elephune 919-707-2500 L©cuaiOri.
NC DEPARTMENT OF'I'k'lNSPORTATK)N Fax:g19-733-942X I SOUTH Wil MINGTON STREET
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER C•irstomer.Service: I-877-36k-4Q68 RAI.EIGH,NC 27601
MAIL SERVICE CENTER:536
RALEIGH.NC 27699-1,534. Il ebsite:wnW I1cduC.gOY

NC Department of Transportation I Division of Highways {�
SUBJECT L1n] Ti P1 CAL.. PROJECT 5 0 UT -( �c - �`�LMAlh LL
PREPARED BY 0 H+J S 'Pf1, e COUNTY k y..,b tr
DATE Co - 1 3- STATION c A S to
1
.1i.�
6
RECEWED
SUN 1 S Nig
LEIGH
� 'QC'N� HA
4 04
9 $ 70
r piN);,‹ .
n
r
(7 F. (-
J r� r
I
c, `8 c
� " x
• r+
V
Ul —
1-1
I V r///"n) t
a r
fit
SD-01 DOT#161003399

Project Trucking No.{Internal Use)
19-06-0019
,I� HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
. ,�'�, NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM •
, 4
. lif This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
,Project No: County: Hyde
WBS No.: 15401.1048012 Document PCE
• Type:
Fed.Aid No: Funding: ® State [f Federal
Federal ® Yes n No Permit USAGE,NPS
Permit(s): Type(s):
Project Description:
Emergency Seawall Installation at north end of Ocracoke Island: Installation of 900 feet of sheet
pile to protect the eroding area(along both the basin and the sound sides of the point)at the
South Dock of the ferry on Ocracoke Island. Will also require grading an area to install a crane
for use during the construction. For the purposes of this review,the Area of Potential Effects is
the area around the ferry dock and the hairpin turn at the north end of the island.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
HPOWeb confirms that there are no NR-listed or eligible properties within the project APE. The
project falls within the Cape Hatteras National Seashore which is under the jurisdiction of the
National Park Service. Project area was reviewed in in Google Street View and found no
historically significant structures or landscapes in the project area. Therefore, no historic
properties will be affected by the proposed work and the project is in compliance with Section 106
of the NHPA.
Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there are
no unidentified significant historic architectural or landscape resources in the project area:
HPO GIS data, Google Street View, and previous surveys by architectural historians are
considered valid tools for the purposes of determining the likelihood of impacts to historic
resources.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURr EY REOT!MED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 3

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
®Map(s) ©Previous Survey Info. Photos DCorrespondence 12Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes--NO SURVEY REQUIRED
Mary Pope Furr 6/18/2019
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
a
PROJECT o G
Lt CATION
71
i 1 -C'
t. t eitt,
rrW`.
cps
OCRACOK£
f: t G
C' ta
0'�+ t C t'Vicinity map South Dock of the Ferry on Ocracoke
Historic Architecture and Landscapes WO SURVEY REQUIRED farm for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 3

Project Tracking No.:
19-06-0019
/oa5 NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM 0
A, Q `.." ti
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not �-
v[Uit,t'a.l valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
CSe7 Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. ‘ p
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: Shoreline Stabilization County: Hyde
WBS No: 15401.1048012 Document: Federal CE
F.R. No: Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type:USACE
Project Description:The project involves the stabilization of the shoreline in order to protect the basin in
Hyde County,North Carolina. Erosion has compromised the integrity of the ferry basin bulkhead and
rendered the vehicle stacking lanes unusable.To mitigate the erosion,installation of a new sheet pile wall
on both the sound and basin sides of the point will be constructed.The archaeological Area of Potential
Effects(APE)encompasses all areas of potential ground disturbing activity as depicted on the attached
GIS mapping.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities,results of review,and conclusions:
Permitting and funding information was reviewed for determining the level of archaeological input required by
state and federal laws. Based on the submitted"request for cultural resources review"form,the project is state-
funded with federal permit interaction.As such,Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act will apply
and the United States Army Corps of Engineers(UJSACE)will serve as the lead federal agency.Next,construction
design and other data was examined(when applicable)to define the character and extent of potential impacts to
the ground surfaces embracing the project locale.
Once an APE was outlined,a map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology
(OSA)on Thursday,June 13,2019. No NRHP eligible archaeological sites or any other previously documented
archaeological sites are located within or adjacent to the APE.
Examination of National Register of Historic Places(NRHP),State Study Listed(SL},Locally Designated(LD),
Determined Eligible(DE),and Surveyed Site(55)properties employing resources available on the NCSHPO website
is important in establishing the location of noteworthy historic occupations related to a perspective construction
impact area.A cross-check of these mapped resources concluded that none of the above properties with possible
contributing archaeological components are situated within or proximal to the APE.
In addition,historic maps of Hyde County were appraised to identify former structure locations,land use patterns,
cemeteries,or other confirmation of historic occupation in the project vicinity.Archaeological/historical reference
materials were inspected as well.In general,the cultural background review established that no previously
recorded archaeological sites,cemeteries,or NRHP listed archaeological sites are located within the APE.Based on
cultural-historical factors,the APE is considered to have a low potential for the documentation of archaeological
resources.
Further, topographic, geologic, flood boundary, and NRCS soil survey maps were referenced to evaluate
pedeological, geomorphological, hydrological, and other environmental determinants that may have resulted in
past occupation at this location. Aerial and on-ground photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer) and the Google
Street View map application (when amenable) were also examined/utilized for additional assessment of
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects orQuualifred in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
Iof2

Project Tracking No.:
19-06-0019
disturbances,both natural and human Induced,which compromise the integrity of archaeological sites.
Environmental/impact factors do not suggest a heightened potential for archaeological resource recovery.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The entire project study area is largely disturbed from erosion.There are no existing NRHP eligible archaeological
sites within the projects APE,and it is unlikely to contain significant,intact,and preserved archaeological deposits.
As currently proposed as a state-funded project with federal permits,no further consultation is advocated.A
finding of"no archaeological survey required"is considered appropriate.
This project falls within a North Carolina County in which the Catawba Indian Nation has expressed an interest:
Hyde County.It is recommended that you contact each federal agency involved with your project to determine
their Section 106 Tribal consultation requirements.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ®Map(s) ®Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
❑Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects asQeafied in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 2