20100808 Ver 1_401 Application_20100910

111 11111
27962
FROM S & EC
FAST LANE PICKUP DATE i4; .G.UI PICK P?}T,IME • r
f DRIVER OF PIECES..- EIGHT
FAME DAY'
BILL TO : (SHIPP R RECEIVER 3RD PARTY
NEXT DAY CAR VAN ROUND TRIP CHARGES
11010 RAVEN RIDGE ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27614
846-5900
828-0303

TO ?I
COMPANY NAME D(&
STREET >ADDRESS-2Z2.1 r-?'G fy
CITY K?' t lit (.'r'w ST !?_ ZIP
CONTACT NAME 1'6 + 1 'e" l rGrr
PHONE #
PROJE?T- k ? tY,a• f r;_?&
s I ? ?n
/mil' C 4 r??'ti .?.. ':>?.i• ?? j41'::ItZ )?...? /r?t1 :s M? !I'Y.. 1
e
SIGNATURE i';c_ PRINT ' 3 r lr"DATE r1' ;-//J TIME L.? j ;I
20100808
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
PAID September 29, 2010
lip S&EC Project # 9139.P1
To: US Army Corps of Engineers N.C. Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 4 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit
Attn: Jamie Sherri Attn: Ian McMillan
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Ste. 105 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Wake Forest, NC 27587 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 ? ??
From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road S E JP v 0 l010
Raleigh, NC 27614
DiM. WATER QUAUTY
Re: Salem Village Subdivision, Phase 1 & 2A VfflL4WAWMTER6R WCH
Apex, Wake County, NC
On behalf of the owners, CJS Apex Assemblage, LLC, please find attached a complete application and supplemental
information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 29 and General Water
Quality Certification 3821. Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional
information.
NOTE: Bridges were used to avoid impacts to the perennial streams. Impacts to intermittent streams and wetlands
would be necessary.
PRn.IFCT GI IMMORV
Project Name Salem Village, Phase 1 & 2A
Project T e Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant CJS Apex Assemblage, LLC
Count Wake
Nearest Town Raleigh
Waterbod Name Big Branch
Basin / Sub-basin Cape Fear / 03-06-07
Index Number 18-7-6-1
Class C- NSW
USGS Cataloging Unit 03030004
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.044
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.324
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.010
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.378
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 269 (Perm.) & 27 (Temp)
Total Riparian Buffer Impacts (square feet): 0
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form Site Plans
USGS Topographic Map & NRCS Soil Survey Map Impact Exhibits
Agent Authorization Form $570.00 Application Fee to DWQ
DWQ Buffer Determination Letter (12/5/06) Stormwater Management Plan Approvals (Ph 1 & 2A)
Town of Apex Buffer Determination Letter (12/18/06)
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Q?0F WATEgg G
Y
o ?
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number: 3821
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ® Yes ? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below. ? Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Salem Village
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Apex
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: CJS Apex Assemblage, LLC & Prince Holdings, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 11831/1832 & 11831/1828 & 12378/1563 & 12196/0184
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): CJS Apex Assemblage, LLC - Attn: Mr. Mark Schweibinz & Prince Holdlings, LLC Attn:
Ms. Nancy Fish
3d. Street address: 7000 Six Forks Rd., 2321 Blue Ridge Rd., Ste. 101 & 911 S. Salem St.
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27615 & Apex, NC 27502
3f. Telephone no.: 919-604-4114 & 919-621-3047
3g. Fax no.: N/A
3h. Email address: N/A
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Owners - please copy owners and agent on all
correspondence
4b. Name: CJS Apex Assemblage, LLC - Attn: Mr. Mark Schweibinz & Prince Holdlings, LLC Attn:
Ms. Nancy Fish
4c. Business name
(if applicable): CJS Apex Assemblage, LLC & Prince Holdings, LLC
4d. Street address: 7000 Six Forks Rd., 2321 Blue Ridge Rd., Ste. 101 & 911 S. Salem St.
4e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27615 & Apex, NC 27502
4f. Telephone no.: 919-604-4114 & 919-621-3047
4g. Fax no.: N/A
4h. Email address: N/A
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Nicole J. Thomson
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5c. Street address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27614
5e. Telephone no.: [phone]
5f. Fax no.: [phone]
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0741061343, 0731854854, 0741048525, 0741032621,
0731943252
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.713652 Longitude: - 78.8647
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: +/- 195 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Big Branch; 18-7-6-1; 03-06-07
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Cape Fear Basin (USGS Cataloging Unit 03030004)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The subject site is mostly forested with a Colonial Pipeline utility easement running through the northeast corner of the
property. The surrounding land use is primarily residential, with new residential subdivisions currently being constructed.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
+/- 3.3 ac.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
+/- 7,990 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct the Salem Village subdivision to provide additional residential housing
for the area. The proposed impacts to streams and wetlands are necessary to construct the necessary development
roadway infrastructure as well as for the required utility installations.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed development will be for a residential subdivision with typical roads and utilities. Heavy equipment
typically necessary for road and home construction, as well as utility installation, will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
Comments: Site verifications have been completed with the
Corps and the survey has been submitted for approval.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental
Consultants, PA
Name (if known): S&EC,PA Staff Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
DWQ 12/5/06; Corps site verifications occurred over multiple days; Survey has recently been submitted for approval.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ® Yes ? No
6b. If yes, explain.
The overall sheets and parcel numbers show all parcels included in the development. This application is only for Phase 1
& 2A of the development. Future phases have not been designed. Impacts to jurisdictional waters are not anticipated,
but if required will be submitted to the Corps and DWQ for review with the understanding that they will be cumulative to
the impacts requested in this application.
Page 4 of 12
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
® Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 ®P ? T Road Crossing Forested/Non- ® Yes ® Corps 0
130
Sheet A/impact #1 (permanent) riparian ? No ? DWQ .
W2 ? P ®T Sewer Installation Forested/Non- ® Yes ® Corps 0
043
SheetA/Impact#2 (temporary) riparian ? No ? DWQ .
W3 ? P ®T Sewer Installation Forested/Non- ® Yes ® Corps 0
009
Sheet B/Impact#3 (temporary) riparian ? No ? DWQ .
W4 ®P ? T Road Crossing Forested/Non- ® Yes ® Corps 0
106
Sheet D/Impact# 7 (permanent) riparian ? No ? DWQ .
W5 ? P ®T Road Crossing Forested/Non- ® Yes ® Corps
0
005
Sheet D/Impact# 8 (temporary) riparian ? No ? DWQ .
W6 ®P ? T Road Crossing Forested/Non- ® Yes ® Corps 0
031
SheetG/Impact#11 (permanent) riparian ? No ? DWQ .
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.324
2h. Comments: Of the 0.324 ac. of wetland impact, 0.267 ac. is permanent impact and 0.057 ac. is temporary impact.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (I NT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ®T Road Crossing UT to Big Branch ? PER ® Corps 6 121
Sheet C/Impact# 5 (Permanent) ® INT ® DWQ
S2 ? P ? T Road Crossing UT to Big Branch ? PER ® Corps 6 7
Sheet C/Impact# 6 (Temporary) ® INT ® DWQ
S3 ? P ? T Sewer Crossing UT to Big Branch ? PER ® Corps 3 20
Sheet F/Impact#10 (Temporary) ® INT ® DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 148
3i. Comments: Of the 148 feet of stream impact, 121 is permanent and 27 is temporary.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ? P ®T

SheetB/I mpact#4 UT to Big Branch Sewer Installation (temporary) pond 0.010
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts 0.010
4g. Comments: The proposed open water impact is temporary in nature for the sewer line installation.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fil l out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin? This project is in the ? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Cape Fear River Basin and there currently are no state ? Catawba ? Randleman
regulated buffers on the Cape Fear River.
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact
re uired?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No
B3 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 12
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant requested a detailed delineation of streams and wetlands prior to site plan development in order to
determine the extent and location of streams and wetlands on the subject property. The site plan has limited permanent
impacts to three road crossings within wetland areas. There is one proposed stream crossing of an
unimportant/intermittent channel, however the applicant has opted to utilize a spanning structure so as to avoid
permanent channel impacts. Streams are not crossed multiple times by roads. The proposed road crossings are
necessary in order to provide the needed internal roadway infrastructure connectivity required for resident and emergency
vehicle access.
The applicant is also aware of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide Permit 29. With respect to
residential development conditions (Regional Conditions section 4.9) the applicant does not anticipate any impacts to
streams or wetlands associated with any required stormwater facilities, there are no proposed single-family recreation
facilities, there are no 100 year floodplain limits identified on this project and therefore, there are no permanent wetland or
stream fills proposed within the floodway and finally, the stream classification for this project is C (i.e. not Outstanding
Resource Waters or High Quality Waters).
The applicant recognizes that the proposed temporary impacts for the sewer line installation will be for the minimum
period of time required to complete the activity and that the stream and wetland areas must be returned to pre-impact
conditions. The proposed sewer line construction corridor as well as the proposed permanent easement corridor is only
20 feet wide (i.e. does not exceed 40 feet in width). The proposed sewer line is not anticipated to interfere with navigation
nor is it proposed to be aerial in nature. No rip-rap is proposed for the stream crossing for the proposed sewer line
installation.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Orange protective fencing will be placed outside of the impacted wetland corridor to ensure protection of the non-
impacted wetlands. It is the intent of this plan for construction impact to take place during the dryer months of the year.
Also where the sewer line installation occurs within wetland areas, as each section of sewer main is installed the ground
elevations will be restored and seeded with wetland type grasses immediately. The sewer alignment was determined in
the field to minimize the impacts to trees and wetlands while allowing more efficient installation techniques to minimize
negative impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ® Yes ? No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ® Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
®Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes * Requested
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.648 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h. Comments: The above assumes 2:1 mitigation for all wetland impacts (permanent & temporary). Only 0.267 acres of
permanent impacts are proposed. S&EC believes that a total of 0.5 (1.5:1 ratio) would be appropriate for the impacts
proposed.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No

Project is in the Cape Fear Basin
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a . What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? >24 %
2b . Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d . If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Attached are approval letters from the Town of Apex and plans for Phases 1 & 2A. The application requests a conditional
401 Certification approval for the remaining phases of the development such that once these phases are developed,
copies of the Town of Apex approved stormwater management plans are provided to DWQ prior to impacts.
® Certified Local Government
2e . Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Apex
® Phase II
3b . Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ® Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a . Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b . Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a . Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b . Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated
Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft
states that most residential subdivisions and small scale commercial developments are unlikely to cause cumulative
impacts. This project does not meet any of the three criteria of private projects that can clearly result in cumulative
impacts. This development is relatively small in nature, is within a residentially developed landscape bounded by South
Salem Street and US 1 to the north and south respectively and therefore, the utility infrastructure (i.e. water and
electricity) are already in place to service the proposed development. We anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative
or quantitative impact analysis is required.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will connect to existing sewer lines. The Town of Apex will insure that the capacity of their treatment facility
will not be exceeded.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes Z No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes Z No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC-Natural Heritage Programs Virtual Workroom was used to search for elemental occurrences of state and
federally protected species in the vicinity of the project. It was determined based on the search that elemental
occurrences of one state species of concern exist within 2 miles of the center of the project area. There were no
elemental occurrences of federally threatened or endangered species within 2 miles of the center of the project area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes Z No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The proposed project is in Wake County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat that would support EFH (i.e. salt
marshes, oyster reefs, etc.)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes Z No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
* Records checks at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State Archeology were not performed. No
structures were noticed during the wetland evaluation. The project is consistent with adjacent land uses. Further, the
National Register of points produced by the NC SHPO (utilizing Google Earth) does not show any historic or
archeological resources on the project site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes Z No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http://floodmaps.nc.gov/fmis/MainMap.aspx
Bob Zarzecki

S September 29,
2010
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name s-E ignafure
(Z-AA r
(Agent's signs rs-TaTlid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Date
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Rxlcigh, North Carob 27614 • Photo: [phone] • Fsx; [phone]
www.SandEC.com
Address: ? OOD
Ir,
?C
-ILM Phone: ?ro -11
Project Natne/Description:.-- ?aA V 111 S&EC Project # "
Date: !; - k i - to
The Departmcnt of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Di,srrict
P .O. Box 1890
Wi]mi w on,NC 28402
Attu
Field Office:
?-i w
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
i, the current landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants,
PA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of pern-t t applications, tof uTdsh upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, cte, from this day forward. The day of
Mg4tn
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE. This authorization; for ilabliity and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officixis to
enter the property when accoraparded by S&EC staff. You should cal! S&EC to arrf Dge a site mectiag prior to
visiting the a1te. cffl? Q
apt - VVL.-t , 116- rr J( h =

Print Property Owner's or MI-U icipal Official's N
CC,- Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Property Owncr's,prMurdcipal Official's Signatu??
? e?
cc. Mr. Bob Zarzecki C-7r A 47c 9f? ?t?alfirtr t 6
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
?? c7r
236 LcPhillip Court, Suitt C 3817^ Lawndale Drive
Conner( NC 28425 Grreensboro. NC 27455
Phone: Fax; (709) 4) (7 720-94094p6 6 720- Phone_ Oa6} $40-9234
Fax: 0
Fax: (396) 54()-8235
AGENT AtTTHORiZATION FORM
AJ1 s To Be Filled In B The urren ndowner or Municipal Official
Name: cZ? kstm ? &-,, w -r-
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Rrvrn Ridge Road • Raleigh, NoAh Carollru 27614 • P6ont: [phone] • Fav [phone]
w'ww.Sand.Ec.com
AGENT AUj'HOPUATION FORM
6 1Jgnks To Be Fifled In By The Current landowner or Municipal Official,
Name: ,; V-`(-
Address: ?C?two C1
?.? PC- ',l5o,L
Phone: 1 4-
Project NamefDcsscription; Wtm
Date: 7 " is -
The Department of the Army
U_S. Army Corps ofEngimerrs, Wihnington District
P,O. Box 1890
Wil-ingtvn_ NC 28402
Attn:
Field Offiec:
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Pernrtitting
To Whom It May Concern:
S&EC Project # \ks
I, the Current landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants,
PA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to ftunish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc, from this day forward. The IS-14" day of AAT `61
0
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE. This authorization, for 11abWty and professional courtesy rexeoas, is valid only for governmeat officistis to
enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You ghoul call S&CC o arrange a We mating prior to
villLEaQ the mite. ® S ? d t 14" M LAI --
iv d
Print Property Owners or Municipal Official's Name Pro Owner's or Municipal Officiai's Signature
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDINR -- DWQ
2321 Crabtree Bouksvwi
Raleigh, NC 27604
cc: Mr. Bob 7.w7=l i
Soil & Envim=enud Consultants, PA

236 LcPhillip Court, suite c aixbo o Offl=
Coord 3817-E Uwndale Drive

Phone: (704) d) 722t)0- -9405 Greensboro, NC 27455

Fax: [phone]dQ6 Phone: (336}.540-8234
Fax; [phone]
figs ? f . r 1,?. - ?'r/ ,`,•?-.?` i ? .. zr +, ? y, ? / r; /fIr rd?
4-11
f - , }??• ? !? --?,? ,S,t' ?+- _ u f? t' +: rl? 1 f '\., ? ?'?, r r \ .:w / 1.•
r f - I 'ti `t
Tr?
( j ! -"
?! .. ?, If -?? jI (?..?'??`.')` ?' ^ Cr•°=.?1 ?'? ?? lJ If `''? f ,r?r `) I Yi ? /, yam. 4 '. t _"?; ?? 10? i?)) ? ,?" ?'?`""_z? S
''? `', ??..,? /.,-•, ` S^ I,, J L /. i ry ?t \J-N- ?„?..., fJl.+iJ? ? •?`-? \
n • II ? ?„?.t? `y_ t- ? ;.Cy--- ?,t. ? ?tr ?i: 1 I ? `-??"` f / ?+ ? i '' 1 ; r ,,n ?? / f /'
!JA I
ld, 1rr'? (' ??.ty!j, /, ? x .? ll? ??! ? t r`.. ? ?''?JL ?•? i-?'?. ? - 'Y? ? '111 +11!'
?r T (?,?,?'\?.. .\?;\. • I\?.? ? j, 4 l j r? '')?j{t 1 1 ?? -° ?•-? ?. - j \tt 1\.. ' e? r-'Y' ?? \t .'} ?" J?..?f
JI I`. f ?? `e. ??fr' / ?r?.lJ ?/f1tJ i'I? ??11?If .'\` JJ!._. ? ---'" / f?i ?' ef? + ?' '?? i
`1 ?? f S 1 (??f ? _ 'rr Jl ` 7? 1T
J ' ? !. '? ?? i?? ?.+?x 1 • _„/_ l,1 "\\' `f1y?? all i 2>?rt?`--,?. '? 1
. I.°e _ •?+YS: 7 .i: ? : ???"?.?J .. Jfi iE,!r . l._,.r.?'?-??/.???J'J?l ????,^? ??e',? ?. -; ' +„ . e F.i. ?iV ? I ,?'' J `y1`, J % .
r y ? 1 P? . ?? ..? •- I {7 f - `yu ? I, ';"? ''.? ,/ i alp ,?°r Je ? ?f ? 1 f i }t:.- ? f , -? Jf+ -
••+^'?tyt.,,..r:. `? .1Va ,/, •..'l?i.-•- ??,a C ;'\t "(,f' , t`',;_ ??A..= ;?g?? ?^?• d,?f T'??? ?_ ,l t? '?i, , ??`f? ? _ ?'??
J f i?11 lr \?? 7L'?`
r,.`. ? 1`v 0 r .? 1?_ ?J J ? ;'YLi i ^ `. , -. i lf/ G? ".._.- .?,'?• i/ //Ir1 // I+^ L a
.. ? . -et?`' ? ,I?`_ ?: , 4 ll ! ;?`?r'li` ?,, ' S ?,•?ry'r{;,;1`? i - ? r - ''????? i'? ? 1- ?, t \? +aP f ?: 35°? a
ir+ ? i ,rr `)?"'\ .? ? ? f ' ??'`?'?y-.t -"?i t "? ?? r"i.,' •' ?' ; 1 I? r ?rk'.?' ?, ?? `,?? ?? \? ,.? ? t ? f? r .'?r,t J`/?
?'aiD S!?. 'S'? . ,..f F ? r%..I ???r• S ? .. xµ_ 7 A /` ? / r ' ? y r- f' , . `._ ?, i' a I { f J ?
`Y-$ 1 a f r ?..' al , •_-.-''/„r'If ../ '? I - ? K '' t{?.J ' ?qt ! ? ;`1 y -' . r t ?? I ?,i- -'I ? ?` .,'r --,.
tf1 ? ?? "ty ?? I /ft,s"$??? r'??-'' illh4?j i`???/? >? ? •JJ?`. ?1 ?.i?J/+''ti'? ? ? { ?l°? "4w.
,'?'? A ,y? . i?4? ? ' ? ? ?? •-y J? ? '? `4 ? ` ? l ;? i k (i ail / _ 3 f + ?,.,%i ;. ._•-%';i r--, ` .r.
Project No. Figure 1 - USGS
9139.W3 Topographic Quadrangle
Project Mgr.: Apex Assemblage Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Chris Flowers Wakefield Development Company 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
Wake County, NC [phone] - [phone]
Scale: Web Page: www.SandEC.com
1" = 1,320'
New Hill and Apex
08/01/06 Quadrangle
s/
O

r' N ix
f

k-
o? CrB2 ?
iAi[+? ??? ?
ti MtCi
1 ` _
-y
o
R {I`
?'

. F
+
?
y MIU2

Project No. Figure 2 - NRCS Soil
9139.W3 Survey Map

Project Mgr.: Apex Assemblage
Chris Flowers Wakefield Development Company
W
k
C
NC
t
oun
y,
a
e
Scale:
1" = 1,320'
W
k
C
t
S
il S
a
e
oun
y
o
urvey
10131/06 November, 1970

`lAlB2
f
J '
- rBz l
CrE CrE
i~ z
?s .. ?re?JI c.ez
? r S
j Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] - [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
4?0? W A ??9QG
}
UP,
Mr. Luke Tuschak
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
December 5, 2006
Ir j
1 (q j ?iY'+ r-
t
8y Soil 6 Enyi mn+nental Consultants. R
IPRRO 06-019
County: Wake
INTERMITTENT/PERENNIAL (I/P) STREAM DETERMINATION
Project Name: Apex Assemblage
Location/Directions: Site is located on the south side of Old U.S. 1, and west of Tingen Road in Apex.
Subject Stream(s): Big Branch and UTs to Big Branch
Date of I/P Determination(s): 11/15/06
Feature I/P Call Location of I/P Point
(GPS Points and/or
Fla Notes/Basis for Call (Stream Form Rating, Biol. Indicators,
etc.).
A P Off property Feature intermittent on northern portion of site; I/P point
off property. Feature re-enters the property as a perennial
stream 32.5 on form).
B -- Not Present
C P Off Property Feature intermittent on northern portion of site (27.5 on
form); I/P point off property. Feature re-enters the
property as a perennial stream
D -- Not Present
E -- Wetland system; no stream present
F P Not Contested
G I
H I
I -- Not Present
J I Intermittent above ponds; wetlands below
K -- Wetland system; no stream present
L -- Offsite; not evaluated
M -- Not Present
N -- Not Present
NorthCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Phone [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
12/5/2006
Page 2 of 2
Feature I/P Call Location of I/P Point
(GPS Points and/or
Fla Notes/Basis for Call (Stream Form Rating, Biol. Indicators,
etc.).
O -- Not Present
P I
Q I
R I
S -- Wetland system; no stream present
T -- Isolated pond
U I
V -- Not present
W I
X I
Y P Y Start Imp. Per. Ch.
Z -- Offsite; not evaluated
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties
that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local may request a determination by the Director.
A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c% Cyndi Karoly, DWQ
Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the
affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ recommends
that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that thirdparty appeals are made in a timely
manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714.
This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
The (owner/future owners) should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 4041401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)-733-1786, and the US Army Corp of ?Engineer
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-876-8441.
Eric W.
CC: File Copy
Central Files
DWQ Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
Mike Deaton - Town of Apex
N' Carolina
Adhl,ra!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Phone [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone]
I 1 ''
THE PEAK OF GOOD LIVINO
December 18, 2006
Mr. Luke Tuschak
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject: Appeal of Water Quality Buffer Requirements
Apex Assemblage Site
Dear Mr. Tuschak,
P 0. BOX 250
APEX, NORTH CAROLINA 27502
EC,EIF
_ P
P
By: Soil S 1"n1 velital COMItanls. + A
On Monday, October 30, 2006, we met at the subject site to perform riparian buffer calls on a variety of
drainage features. Based on the information obtained during the site visit and per the requirements set
forth in Section 6.1.11 of the Town of Apex (Town) Unified Development Ordinance, I conclude the
following riparian buffer widths shall apply as shown in the table below:
Drainage
Feature
Shown as on USGS Shown as on Soil
Survey Determination made
in the field Determined
Buffer Width
A Intermittent Intermittent Intermittent 50'
B Not Shown Intermittent Not Present 0'
C Intermittent Perennial Intermittent 50'
D Not Shown Intermittent Not Present 0'
E Not Shown Intermittent Not Present 0'
F Pernnial Perennial Perennial 100'
G Not Shown Intermittent Intermittent 50'
H Not Shown Intermittent Intermittent 50'
1 Not Shown Intermittent Not Present 0'
J Intermittent Intermittent Intermittent Above Ponds 50'
K Not Shown Intermittent Not Present 0'
L Not Shown Intermittent Not Evaluated 0'
M Not Shown Intermittent Intermittent 50'
N Not Shown Intermittent Not Present 0'
O Not Shown Intermittent Not Present 0'
P Not Shown Not Shown Not Present 0'
Ap E•1'
2 Q
O Z
pjy?PO?i
-90am 0/
Apex Assemblage Buffer Appeal
December 18, 2006
Page 2 of 2
Q Not Shown Intermittent Intermittent 50'
R Intermittent Perennial Intermittent 50'
S Not Shown Intermittent Not Present 0'
T Not Shown Perennial below and 5 Not Present 0'
U Not Shown Intermittent Intermittent 50'
V Not Shown Intermittent Intermittent 50'
W Intermittent Intermittent Intermittent 50'
X Intermittent Perennial below and Intermittent 50'
Intermittent above and Not Present 0'
Y Not Shown Intermittent Not Present 0'
Intermittent Perennial Intermittent to Fla "Y" 50'
Perennial below Fla "Y" 100'
Z Not Shown Intermittent Not Present 0'
Please be aware that ponds shown on the USDA Soil Survey and USGS topographic maps are also
subject to Town riparian buffer requirements. It has been determined that no ponds have a hydrological
connection to a perennial stream; therefore all ponds shall have a 50 foot riparian buffer.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael S. Deaton, PE
Environmental Programs Manager
Attachments
Cc: Tim Donnelly, PE

W E

/ \1 ? I } 1? 1/)J(? V?? ? `?]?1??? r??l \ ?. Zvi-'?..L_ /?_ ?- ? f `'\ ? ?\ .- ,. -rr -?r'• } n

\? \?? \ (
1, 1?',• J'' `/ % ` '?i 'i-?-., ley f. r..?i ?l ?,\\ \ -1?1? ??'_'\ ?.
_JI

\
.?h L'' • I ? ? \
, ?? `--°;?? ?`\1??? ?\ ? J` Olt ? ,?;`? J )' /+I> /'%.il/ t? v ;`;I• ? e ,'? '/I??;, !', ? ?

??:- ?LS1 ?";-?• ???, ' ? ; rte ??' ,\ _ -? ? ?', JCS ? .'?,??-?'I` ?' l' ' ???` ?,? ??'r??% !??;:',,??-?lyd?

1

:'`
1./ ?l! J n
',1
r? '" ?\1?q./ ( / "'i- `\ ,{` ;?? C 1.4?/!fJrv L%1 /i ' ,! i y? /( r•J?_L `J I ./ ?/ ? ?./ J_/
SJ
(
17?
_
?,
J
??/?
/
? ? ?
?
?
Jl
? • H\? j
???? J .
??,
`.,C? ?/
`.r
II
( ? f J/ ?
`?.?
/ %
?_.
y% i?
„
r
r 1?
1 J ,
7 ,

V17
1 u I' .-;ice, ` rl ' ?
Project No. Figure 1 - USGS
9139.W3 Topographic Quadrangle
Project Mgr.: Apex Assemblage Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Chris Flowers Wakefield Development Company
W
k
C
t
NC 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
a
e
oun
y, [phone] • [phone]
Scale:
'
" Web Page: www.SandMcom
= 1,320
1
New Hill
nd A
ex
p
a
08/01/06 Quadrangle
5: � � �?�� i. � �' �;. � •ter -
a w n a e Pr,
IN
d4o.
IN
rz a. f'^'�.a.-��..-. / �. <ir Com_• '""
AlrhaIC
NT7�
.
Owl
4
�r a[ _ +T a�a i A. � ,. �r •r+` fir..
IM
��. 2"'9'�'Pa 4-�'. �l fl cg: i''�.r. _ 'lM�, 1ii �.s'�: �..-e�w✓�i � 4.: r3W��.?i.� �� - ��� r�

.In
Ilu??il
THE PEAK OF GOOD LIVING
roam Of Og 1G
P. O. BOX 250
APEX. NORTH CAROLINA 27502
May 25, 2010
Michael Schneider, PE
Withers & Ravenel
111 MacKenan Drive
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Subj ect: Approval of Stormwater Management Plan
Salem Village - Phase One
Dear Mr. Schneider:
On May 24, 2010 the Town of Apex (Town) approved the stormwater management plan (SMP)
for Phase One of the subject site. As you are aware, the Town has a Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) approved Post-Construction Stormwater Program per the requirements set forth in our
NPDES Phase 11 permit. Therefore, in accordance with the August 20, 2007 memorandum from
DWQ Director Coleen Sullins as well as an update letter sent to local programs in October 2007,
this Town approval of the subject SMP will satisfy the stormwater requirements necessary for a
DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
A449
Michael S. Deaton, PE
Environmental Programs Manager
.In
Ilu??il
THE PEAK OF GOOD LIVING
roam Of Og 1G
P. O. BOX 250
APEX. NORTH CAROLINA 27502
May 25, 2010
Michael Schneider, PE
Withers & Ravenel
111 MacKenan Drive
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Subj ect: Approval of Stormwater Management Plan
Salem Village - Phase 2A
Dear Mr. Schneider:
On May 24, 2010 the Town of Apex (Town) approved the stormwater management plan (SMP)
for Phase 2A of the subject site. As you are aware, the Town has a Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) approved Post-Construction Stormwater Program per the requirements set forth in our
NPDES Phase 11 permit. Therefore, in accordance with the August 20, 2007 memorandum from
DWQ Director Coleen Sullins as well as an update letter sent to local programs in October 2007,
this Town approval of the subject SMP will satisfy the stormwater requirements necessary for a
DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
A449
Michael S. Deaton, PE
Environmental Programs Manager
i .., •rrr;i'iii;:;; :.i%?,;;,;jrll?ri I? i r ii \?\?? ada Fe?y r• n',3/, - _ /: ;RT*"r /' _ __
r,ll\?1 , I,r 1 ,
/ r I r r' r'illll li 11111 'lllll'in ? r, ?'_ _ ? ?''' ?. , - i\" -: j% ' ' __ ?•
-_ /. , I ;,,,; ,,,, y,nr,,/,,; ,, III,'I rl rl I I '''i. ? '"<-': ?%L"ns /%i ;?=::":: _-•'/; I? ;/; _____
I
psi 4?P14''; %i/r?', ,?, ?I?rt??liilp1".II", r i li owl wMMp1 ':,-• ;Yil;?ky :? ? ???: ?;"„ fi'??,?IIlrf?f,jrr'S?M+?I,?af?.?Ca?ifij?' ??-,?,,' i;;
_ rr
MAT(
" - -.; ; ' --=
----
ey / ,
\ """___"" --
_ '"
? r r r r nar, r r , rrrrrr r ' - ? :?. ., r r rn n , I ? ? .:..` • ._ / ... .i. s-" ` '?'> ?, ?? ?- k'?A?A7?PERMI ? - - i •. -
' r ' r r r 1 I I r ,rrr r , ? ; _? .?\ `. .? , r r r rrrrrr r ? Y •_ ____ '? _ _ - '- ?,* _ _- _
'/';;';/';jH/1111, I'Ir(Il.r /! rr'+?n1 i.-(r_\?\•.1,? _ _? - - .j ?.? .?`? i,,; ? },?Ta.__' __
01
I001

"j
r

SHEET H
SHEET G
?%_??''-r=te
SHEET D
SHEETB
ll,t,L. ll rl /-?? SHEET`C
?_ r, I /'i/;; =';":?;. ? ., ?5••.ai•^?'"v' .... ?rr^'1.;?` r .., . , , ?\kr' , ?\?t`1`,`, r. , ? r lr r\,` .,\? `.
1
I'm 3?1e'.- a zu ogre SALEM VILLAGE PHASE 1 & 2A
--d By j.b N.
xm ,e -111city Count North Carolina

r `lr 1r; r, r, I) jl II
11',1111 11 I I
% mil _- ?'?T?,1•,, it i / I 'IIIII1?11ir
111 ' I 'l?lil r Ir 11111
_____
'rl rrll r?? I I III 1111'I 'll
i ', 11 r 11 I III I11 j1'll liil l
IIIII1II1
_ _ _ I , I 1?',.' ll I Illil)'I"I,I IIII
,.. -• =-====?i ,, ., ,,L-II-,11111. , - I
IMPACT SUMMARY

SHEET
IMPACT# PERMANENT
PERENNIAL STREAM
IMPACT PERMANENT
INTERMITTENT STREAM
IMPACT TEMPORARY
INTERMITTENT STREAM
IMPACT PERMANENT
WETLAND
IMPACT TEMPORARY
WETLAND
IMPACT TEMPORARY
OPEN WATER
IMPACT

A #1 5,667 SF (0.130 AC)
#2 1,876 SF (0.043 AC)
#3 400 SF (0.009 AC)
B
#4
448 SF (0.010 AC)
C #5 121 LF 728 SF (0.017 AC)
#6 7 LF 41 SF (0.009 AC)

D #7 4,607 SF (0.106 AC)
#8 211 SF (0.005 AC)
E #9 BRIDGE (NO IMPACT)
F #10 20 LF 61 SF (0.001 AC)
G #11 1,339 SF (0.031 AC)
H #12 148 LF 738 SF (0.017 AC)
TOTALS 48 LF 738 SF (0.017 AC) 121 LF 728 SF (0.017 AC) 27 LF 102 SF (0.010 AC) 11,613 SF (0.267 AC) 2,487 SF (0.057 AC) 448 SF (0.010 AC)
1.
OVERALL SITE PLAN WITH IMPACTS
GRAPHIC SCALE
250 0 125 250 500 Z
O
x
H
x
1 inch = 250 ft.
WITHERS &- RAVENEL S-N
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVIVORS 1
111 -K- D- C- N.1hC-1-27sn m15154-33ao wwwwl,M1--ll-L-- N. 10132
SHEET E ti,
SHEETA -

-- ----- ------
' i i
l

/
i
1
U
+ + + a
+ + +
+ + +
+ + /
+ + +
00
!f
:?' \ fi,! ' ?! f ..... ...

\ \ MIN FFE=370.0 \
IMPACT #1 IMPACT #2
PERMANENT WETLANDS IMPACT 5,667 SF TEMPORARY WETLANDS IMPACT 1,876 SF
(0.130 AC) (0.043 AC)
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
SALEM VILLAGE PH 1 & 2A SHEET A WITHERS RAVENEL
IMPACT #1 & IMPACT #2 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY North Carolina

T I
I I
PEDESTRIAN TRAIL TO
I UTILIZE EXISTING ROAD
? I CROSSING
I I .
u,. - - -
1!
rr
!!
t!
!! r
rr
rr
/p t
ATM,
IMPACT #3 IMPACT #4
TEMPORARY WETLANDS IMPACT 400 SF TEMPORARY OPEN WATER IMPACT 448 SF
(0.009 AC) (0.010 AC)
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
SALEM VILLAGE PH 1 & 2A SHEET B WITHERS RAVENEL
IMPACT #3 & #4 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY North Carolina

I

IMPACT #5 IMPACT #6
PERMANENT INTERMITTENT TEMPORARY INTERMITTENT
STREAM IMPACT STREAM IMPACT
121 LF 7 LF
728 SF (0.017 AC) 41 SF (0.009 AC)
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
SALEM VILLAGE PH 1 & 2A SHEET C WITHERS & RAVENEL
IMPACT #5 AND #6 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY North Carolin.

v
GGIGGGG
74
FFE=377-0
/Jy
t F1f off
d f
ff rl r}J a
?M MZ?

M

0
IMPACT #7 IMPACT #8
PERMANENT WETLANDS TEMPORARY WETLANDS
IMPACT IMPACT
4,607 SF (0.106 AC) 211 SF (0.005 AC)
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
SALEM VILLAGE PH 1 & 2A SHEET D WITHERS & RAVENEL
IMPACT #7 & #8 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY North Carolina
30 0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
SALEM VILLAGE PH 1 & 2A SHEET E WITHERS & RAVENEL
IMPACT #9 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY North Carolina
GRAPHIC SCALE 1

I 2l1' TOWN of APEX PUBLIC J
UTILITY EASEMENT (T-OA PUE
r I OUTFALL ".-A,. I \ Ir
III I
i III I,. \
I I I ! I ?. .
I I I I I? •
?I III
I II I I
II .
I III ?? ? I ?? •\
J 0_
I I a??= I ••
I Lu 1-:!t
z l i \
I o_ 'w _i
q W LL.
Z ?j
I M PACT #10
TEMPORARY INTERMITTENT STREAM
IMPACT
20 LF
61 SF (0.001 AC)
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
SALEM VILLAGE PH 1 & 2A SHEET F WITHERS RAVENEL
IMPACT #10 ER 6INEER3 I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY North Carolina

. . X\>'A

II

/ I I
I ?
IMPACT #11
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
1,339 SF (0.031 AC)
l
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
SALEM VILLAGE PH 1 & 2A SHEET G WITHERS & RAVENEL
IMPACT #10 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY North Carolina
? r y`'
? r
r
I ? r r
r ?
r
/
/
/
ol loll
/
loll
oooo,
\ \ \ \
//
00
00

I M PACT #12
PERMANENT PERENNIAL STREAM
IMPACT
148 LF
738 SF (0.017 AC)
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
SALEM VILLAGE PH 1 & 2A SHEET H WITHERS RAVENEL
IMPACT #12 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY North Carolina
PROPOSED
GRADE -
60" RCP X-ING
(IMPACT #1) .000
Iwo
EXISTING
\ '^
`NOTE: WETLAND CROSSING PIPES
GRADE
WILL NOT BE BURIED AND WILL BE
SET AT EXISTING GRADE
I M PACT #1
LOCATION EXISTING PROPOSED
GRADE INVERT
UPSTREAM 358.50 358.50
DOWNSTREAM 356.90 356.90
NOT TO SCALE
SALEM VILLAGE PH 1 & 2A CULVERT CROSS SECTION WITHERS & RAVENEL
IMPACT #1 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY North Carolina I 1 1 11 -Inln I-, I-, 1.,lh 1-1- Ill 1 1,1 11 l. 11 Ill 1111 .-h--l -
PROPOSED GRADE

EXISTING GRADE` /
42" RCP X-ING\?
(IMPACT #5)
/
/
IMPACT #5
LOCATION EXISTING PROPOSED
GRADE INVERT
UPSTREAM 395.00 394.00
DOWNSTREAM 392.00 391.00
NOT TO SCALE
I SALEM VILLAGE PH 1 & 2A I CULVERT CROSS SECTION I WITHERS & RAVENEL
IMPACT #5 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
WAKE COUNTY North Carolina
PRNP SED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE ,
? ? / / NOTE: WETLAND CROSSING PIPES
48" RCP X-ING WILL NOT BE BURIED AND WILL BE
(IMPACT #6) SET AT EXISTING GRADE
IMPACT #6
LOCATION EXISTING PROPOSED
GRADE INVERT
UPSTREAM 375.50 375.50
DOWNSTREAM 372.00 372.00
NOT TO SCALE
SALEM VILLAGE PH 1 & 2A CULVERT CROSS SECTION WITHERS & RAVENEL
IMPACT #6 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY North Carolina I 1 1 11 -Inln I-, I-, 1.,lh 1-1- Ill 1 1,1 11 l. 11 Ill 1111 .-h--l -

365 365

PROPOSED RADE
360 360
355 355
WINGWALL

EXISTING G DE ?

350 350

SCALE:

345 345

365 365

360 360
355 355

350 350

345 (LOOKING UPSTREAM) 345

SALEM
VI
PH 1 &
2A
CULVERT CROSS SECTION

1
WITHERS RAVENEL
IMPACT #9

ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
I
WAKE COUNTY
APEX Nor
th Carolina 1 1 1 -1- 1-, 1-, 1.,lh 1-1- Ill 1 1,1 1114111141 l. 11 Ill 1111 .-h--l - '

PRO OSED BRIDGE

? TYP

J
U

HOR: 1"=60'

ROPO ED BRI GE
PROP SED G ADE

WING ALL
TYP ?
? EXI TING RADE

J
U

'
SCALE:

DOWNSTREAM ? HOR:1"=60'
VER: 1"=6'

PROPOSED GRADE

EXISTING GRADE----"-? /
(2)48" RCP X-ING
J
(IMPACT #12)

I M PACT #12
LOCATION EXISTING PROPOSED
GRADE INVERT
UPSTREAM 370.00 369.00
DOWNSTREAM 369.00 368.00
NOT TO SCALE
I SALEM VILLAGE PH 1 & 2A I CULVERT CROSS SECTION I WITHERS & RAVENEL
IMPACT #12 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
WAKE COUNTY North Carolina