820109_Inspection_20200714

$F ,4: ,, _ y * l tsion of Water Resources A °,
Faeility Number - tri� / 0 ci 0`Divtsian of Soil and Water Conse4'ation i� o ,
0oOtb r:Ageacy
'>£.x�
Type of Visit: 1 ' mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
hReason for Visit: c 1 utine- 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7 f �,( ®± ival Time: 00 j'i Departure Time:MIMI County: 54)(fr Region:TA /
Farm Name: tJ a., (Q ..1-vt\.., Owner Email:
Owner Name: ID& l Jt, -4,1 - Phone: -
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: • •
Facility Contact: ` .r4414` Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: l t - Integrator: DI. �5
Certified Operator: a Certification Number: 7 73 6 b ( -
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
,Design CurrentsDesign Current � ��� _ 3 i �� Des n� Current
Swine Capacity 'o VVet Poultry Capacity Po, Cattle g , Capacity 'op
Wean to Finish Layer • Dairy Cow -
Wean to Feeder =o Non Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Z
fo7 ( Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder a. ]$v P,oult Ca I act Pao Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish La ers Beef Stocker
_ Gilts II Non-La ers Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Outer ,a : � '=.Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts /
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® O ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: •
a. Was the conveyance man-made? • ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes .. ❑ No E'NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes;notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No TA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [a Po ❑ NA ❑-NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters , ❑ Yes aNO ❑ NA ❑ NE '-,
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e Z O Late of Inspection: R.Zrki27 7,._,46 V
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes0 NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
i Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): .._.7
..
..
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? , ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 11'16 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
I any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental l reat,notify DWR
111II o any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 4Yes n:,4 • ❑ NA ❑ NE
-6
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 02(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? �/
Waste Application
10.Are there any required,buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes lalac ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Accep jJ ble Crop Window " ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): CV, Cg---,-5'6
13. Soil Type(s): CULL N. pc
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ,[(alo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Q-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ] 1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination? _ -
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? . ❑ Yes 0 ` ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes El._,N5-- ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Q-1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ,
❑WUP 0 Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ©-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain,a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Ef No 0 NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and-maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes i o ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: g 2 /O ( Date of Inspection: rL(
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste`application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ILPley ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 111A‘ ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes -o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [✓]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
47)7
S lr ,7 .— —7-9-3 to ( -- 3. c•6 pDu, /___,.."71 6c„f---
0 c70
cell 0-30g4 S
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 13 j Il 0 9 1/� Phone::Ei 4 r l� -��
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: t (y )(LA Date: i Sity
Page 3 of 3 2/4/201