820081_Inspection_20200731

CD/Division of Water Resources 5 3 G �4GV
Facility Number (� 2_ - ($ ( O Division of Soil and Water Conse a on �/
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: (�Commpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: a Houtine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral OEmergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access •
Date of Visit: II 7„it(7..1)`2Arrival Time:d gfJo ,4 Departure Time: Lb- ,°/ County: a 11) Region: F,4
Farm Name: L ae e `e- fs i, L L Owner Email:
Owner Name: C 2r•I` dq rourvitc Phone:
Mailing Address: •
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: < kJ
�u,�'�r j„ a.vti..)t G�C Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 1( Integrator: P i _ I-4.j
t' Operator: - Certification Number: U e In
Certified Oper o f �'(�� /
Back-up Operator: 6���e,'�19/1 Certification Number: /066 �G-7
O
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder. Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean MI I'6.RX) Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder _ Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No E'NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No El-NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ©'IA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes El-No ❑ NA ❑rNE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? .
Page 1 of 3 ` 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: E Z- [ Date of Inspection: 3[ 7—O
Waste Collection&Treatment ll
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [t -NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 2i7 3 7
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ErcTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 1111.o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [GrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E'�l0 0 NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes EKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C 6 S C 0 ,e
13. Soil Type(s): A/O
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes u 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable El Yes Ia'lIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ITK\l'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [!No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes lE No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 2 - p i Date of Inspection: 3 t (7 .J)Z
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ( ❑ Yes i(1\-)lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ,❑ Yes iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EK10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes E'Ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
toct/4-1 1,-Qtre Gc-cvciey
cte
* 7. Mao or- c+,(4' cdy V-1-r,-1-1/4-,;--x 40
Vc. 143 P zo "t-`vt to/G, f
CAA °LL o r- 3 0 g l
Reviewer/Inspector Name: j 'AA 00 y� Phone: I�(0' "l3 t313
f 7_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 0(0,,l Date: 3 C �u,� b
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015