820077_Inspection_20200707

t3' 7 7 ision of Water Resources 0 atW: 1 Y
Facili Number L. - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ._ a- '.',W ;,j'.:
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: �m lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access.
Date of Visit: I z-ist2 p rArrival Time: !.1,01 p Departure Time:eas County:S rSts N Region:. ''Ay
Farm Name: 01 c4- A 6 Ll`-t &lot &1 d-1 D1.( Owner Email:
Owner Name: I✓'b t .k- I4V•e-ft e4:5 rtettt t-,LL Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: A-J t-rovi Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 6 Integrator: 016-- '
Certified Operator: ke \ \e r rr'c9 / Certification Number: Z6 0 2.-AB
Back-up Operator: t( Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
:.Design :Current , ; _, Design Current ,Design Current
Swine ,,,,1,-
, ' a ace hPo . Wet Poultry' Ca aci hPo ; Cattle ;Capacity:-,ty: Pop-
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder _ Non-Layer ' Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Z Ejga �kA0,6. ` Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D r, Poul Ca 1 aci Po"s ': Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish -- Beef Stocker ,V
Gilts El Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Other ' ' •Turke Poults
Other El Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®filo ❑ NA El NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ([6A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No DI A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No LKIA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes go ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 6 2 - 7-7 Date of Inspection: 'S`/_iuly wz7
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [ ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 3o itt /--Lf bej itt,ei14/ mri 2-
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 01 1 ) 2,5 ,� 3 Z
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Ez ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Iri4o 0 NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 11114o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes T/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C 8 `H g&-
13. Soil Type(s): �Gt t� 1��/ 4 -' 81 , i-o i/ L 0-1.
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes lErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 1114 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes EcNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ofNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: h 2, 77 Date of Inspection: 1,:i�(7 7�
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
El Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings ofof facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). /
Cidct tc! (10-• C—M" g(4�7.G & 't' 3j /ZJ /S--/l ill w L��r��►. I.�ce �4' 1-0-2
/,7, qope
WO'
14t 1 I i° --/ s — 1` g 2:97,
Pc tl .Z 17 (17 c To
lOst,tl i b-(c- 1 `f LP" �a
c-eitt CR° 13 - s i
Reviewer/Inspector Name: j � /1001/1,• y Phone:WC -1-B 6 '3 3 3 `f
.. n
'U Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L/' Date: r J 'y
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015