820065_Inspection_20200629

l vw S 1 0 `-U-NQ -7 ? J �
K C Division of Water Resources
Facilhty`Number ' U 6 5 isifnpn O Div of Soil and Water Cons--ation
Q ertAgeny c .
4-` t h c
Type of Visit: erCiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
mpl
n
9.3
Date of Visit:ill 4.-Lc Arrival Time: �',3 D O' Departure Time:I Ah'S o A-I County:cc 4_)t erd 41 Region: F�
Farm Name: " tY;
� r'a-f vkt Owner Email:
Owner Name: C) ' J't` f` ►F 5 L&344--6 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: D -f"e(L rl' 1,e-ivyA Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: r v.-S 'G (�
Certified Operator: Certification Number: "1 7J3,77
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
„iv*, C Design Current `I Design Design Current �esigndurrent
Swine Capacity flop . Wet Poultry Capacity Po Cattle ,; Capacity Pop `
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow .Wean to Feeder LI 3b Non-Layer Dairy Calf
474
Feeder to Finish 4' 5, i ,° Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Cudent- Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D „Poult , Ca 1 act Po-s - Non-Dairy
IA
Farrow to Finish La ers Beef Stocker 7f
Gilts ,--II Non-La ers - Beef Feeder
= Boars Pullets '.` Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys -tc •Oher s n, Turke Poults ;,-,,,t,.,:-. ,-.110,V,a ci .,!‘--1,,,,,,,.,,,i4 . ,..4„,..„,
Other =•Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [-o- ❑ NA El NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No. Ft1 ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No DI-A- ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes Etc151.e IJ-<'A ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes El-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ! 4,5 Date of Inspection: 2.7,1-14,4e._ 20,,'D
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0—I42 ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): _
Observed Freeboard(in): 3 1
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) -
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes hlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 7o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ,El Yes 6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 11'1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): G C ' C -c 0
13. Soil Type(s): Al D (Ak,
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes In---No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes EI ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes u No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 02 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: `'; z - 002_49
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IS l ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes Er< El NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No El NA El NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes r_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑-o El NA El NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? El Yes f'No ❑ NA El NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? El Yes 'I o ❑ NA El NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Cr&(t 11'4)6 a )
S(it1C/ GC011-/—("Ir— Li— 1 C°' 1 12-- zs
67..
C-a( tto 3 0 6 _ � �5I
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ! C`[ Vt&i� f) Phone l 43 3 J 3 3 y
rO
�/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: p
47 Date: (�ll{
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015