820062_Inspection_20200903

Division of Water Resources 4
k
4Facilhfy Number j�� �� 0 Divisions of Soil and Water Conservation
""
r. , 0,'Q.Other Agency �. _r{E';
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:I ` 3 Arrival Time: f,'pb Departure Time:I, -r°!.?0 County: Region:
Farm Name: Tr �yv=r ° ;7 �,n�s • Owner Email:
Owner Name: 5 /f yo.-- K i�t,q� Phone:
Mailing Address: . /.
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ,r rbot`c___ Title: 7- �j�e--. Phone:
•
Onsite Representative: 7y'y6,.g. f C:1- `r&
Integrator: � hGfe
Certified Operator: � ---- Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: `1 Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
=m 3esi n Cup ent esi Current Desi n Cuarrent
Swine Capacity Pop Wet Poultry Capacityy Pop; Cattle '<Capacity Pop
Wean to Finish ,Layer . Dairy Cow ,�'
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf „
_
Feeder to Finish 5 �-/7 �`- _ Dairy Heifer ,.
Farrow to Wean _ ,Design-`=€Current Dry Cow
,- Farrow to Feeder D" ,Pout , .°Ca.aci Po'1 Non-Dairy
t= Farrow to Finish Beef Stocker -
.42 Gilts . •Non-La ers �� a Beef Feeder
Boars El Pullets Beef Brood Cow
OIb'err 0_... °o Ill Turke Poults 5'
1,
Other ' .Other _
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes lag- ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 0-- k_ Date of Inspection: `--,--: ; 7
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): /7. /
Observed Freeboard(in): 7 , `'j
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes IZ l�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes lEi< ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): owl e� 4 2�� /eo 'r ( i /z-
13.Soil Type(s): t'bPvh--/1,7w // /�r�—/ L �� /c
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Eric ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: �� - 42 ate of Inspection: y' —
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes L] 1(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below. •
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon .
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 0 Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 12r< ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [/]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ENoy ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes D4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to ques on#):Explain any YES answers and/or any addition recommendations or any m other coments
, se drawings of facility to1better'explain;situations(use additional`p al ages as°necessary)..,
P
a_ Cr"-2-7-77) azd6i-
TeGDzrd,5 t��ci z'w � D el-� ✓�ms'�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: — Phone: /! 3d„ —0<5-1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: " Date: 3j 72G,'C2
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015