820059_Inspection_20200806

rvision of Water Resources 5.100 /( V 6 tz0 �Facility Number ti - �v510 Division of Soil and Water Consvatton
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Q,E6mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review -0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0,11(.1 tine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Yl3° f. Departure Time:[//`r eaar I County: se (pSOIV Region:, ']
Farm Name: `Th g v-y4on" r i (�/i FA-7.- Owner Email: I
Owner Name: l h a r i.-41 re5 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: I r�
Facility Contact: Cuo415 l a t- ) LC` „`Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: � Integrator: Pe 415‘6
Certified Operator: Ci!YA-C rf1104—ov Certification Number: (`'b ZSi
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: - Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder ? So C{t{SQ Non-Layer - Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Lfttl.o Jc Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish _ Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults _
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? = ❑ Yes ❑ No [ 'NA '❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the-State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No e A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters • ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 - 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e 7 S' Date of Inspection: („A &6 2.0 z
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes © NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No IfitICIA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): .32-. -
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E'NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
I ny of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or enviro ental threat,notify DWR
7. o any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes &WE NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes apco ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes NJ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes lEl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): 6 ~<S (O P CCU) ( ` )c4
13. Soil Type(s): tiA.1 M 4.4/47 n
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Ill' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 04 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? 0 Yes ®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes lEl<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes R'No ❑ NA E NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Er-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Z- Date of Inspection: a 4a.DU
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [ T o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes a";-' ❑ NA El NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ©'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes lj,Nr
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. /
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [3' iI�O ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes t'"V ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 111 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
eatG 641 r i c-( g g(ii,d7e 1I Lis st 3 - ;5-97o
dye_
A-
Roit,
5 (VA 10 t.0
re29/— qo
Q_,(2, (Do A-
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 6 11 0 od&/r Phone:To-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (/�// t� `' Date: -6 40(5-.2,024o
V��� U
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015