820058_Inspection_20200818

Division of Water Resources A I U A-V(7 -O-3-J
Facility Number z- - g 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ($Co i I liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: bi Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: warm Arrival Time:ME NA Departure Time:Imam County: S A'K(q & Region:r
Farm Name: fj '" l "d /Otto-Cal Owner Email: '
Owner Name: G 440 #667 EziA44 5 Ic4 r Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: DV 'G` tit Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: 016►6 syt4vt-Ze
Certified Operator: r R 04— Certification Number:678 807
7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
•
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
_Wean to Finish Layer _ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Si IK d I Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes laC ElNA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? Oyes ❑ No t'N/A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ' ❑ Yes ❑ No []'NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No c TA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0' ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? -
Page 1 of 3 - 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 0 Z- 5 Date of Inspection: l g 0-L ( 2Dk7
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Q'I ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No i[]'gA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): L
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E'co ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E14o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t reat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ ?o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑� Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): G SCT
13. Soil Type(s): tot)A I
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 11 1V ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Ono ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes /. N10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes R I�To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L-t1'1 it ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes F, El NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 6,;Z - ,� 6 Date of Inspection: / 4Ub
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes M-1Cir ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes M ''o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes []-Nt1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes I/PK- ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes M_Ale- El NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑'N ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) /
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes OENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑A'c i ❑ NA El NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ©— ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
5 5 2 - c f? ° - e,
oiu- 30g 6R 5i
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ill V' U( :F
Phone: `��� ` j 3 �
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C / ,�I Date: 'I OCT ti
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015