820051_Inspection_20200827

I"t-S ,L I fiti�� Z.O W Ii13
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number z. - s I 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ®Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 414 i ip-'2010 Arrival Time: ,,]' S. /- Departure Time: /a ,P County: SO)� Region:F
Farm Name: 4- f'-s Owner Email:
Owner Name: A g '85 fv1.4 Phone:
Mailing Address: Q
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:/3- O'^�6 % Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 1 Integrator: -S' h 14L
Certified Operator: 6 rc ✓'c a�G+5 Certification Number: CI 6 1 V tj
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
•
Location of Farm: Latitude:` Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 6'21f0 �h Z.7 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other - Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E J I ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: .❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NoA ❑ NE
b: Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 12X ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) - ❑ Yes ❑ No al{A ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? - - ❑ Yes [ N ❑ NA' ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential'adverse'impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?,
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Z,- ,( Date of Inspection: a'7 4-t 6-20
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes aNO ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No -1E1 NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Zf u C 7 zze c67
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): () el d 7.
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
Q7 Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? - es LC'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ErN7o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11,Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ly 1V ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C 66-° J Ue-1 .Ct,44
13. Soil Type(s): ]j L 0°V.1 ND t)P
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes DiCio ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Rryo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes El NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
-the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: g/� - 5 j Date of Inspection:2,7/ &z 't)I
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Ly"1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 12'�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Erco ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 01Tb ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Er-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
CatA(1Gv` ` f 0,1 -' c ' S ' —11(— ( `(
/ �I co EEC
3_9_6 v E-Y
00
t(.. p (1-ev 13051-; ‘D-Cf" s'i ---
cam('. °Z[(9 - 3 a6-a
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1 O uk,L9� Phone:l id Ji93 33 C
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l ) Date: OC 7 4 u `�7� `
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015