The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About820048_Inspection_20200903 . „,1,--,„:,-,'„ ivision of Water Resources :. Facility Number- - yr 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: �outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit:I c -3,0 Arrival Time:IMF>> Departure Time: 14 0 County:,_ .r `ya- Region: F7V Tle-74,4re Farm Name: � Owner Email: �' /B Owner Name: �y/' sfirA Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: g'( ,tr— -r..-- Title: ` -,e Phone: Onsite Representative: `i°err err&ylV Integrator: 61,:t351/A---4 Certified Operator: ��_� Certification Number: J25-3d / Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Design Current` - _ design Current Swine , Capacity_ Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.e, Cattle :Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Layer •Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder _ Non-Layer Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current' - Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca•aci Po s _,. " Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish ��_ ° Beef Stocker Gilts • II Non-La ers Beef Feeder Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow Other _ •Turke Poults Other •Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ID,No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I J1 ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 9'—',37 Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Efr No ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes .❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): /9 Observed Freeboard(in): 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes la< ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan?. If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes . No ❑ NA 0 NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes lJ 1V o ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 1 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes 12-1‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptablerr Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area U 12.Crop Type(s): /3 a4 c zg./c' 'C1 • 13.Soil Type(s): 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 12-1‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable 0 Yes [rji 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [j'1`l0 ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 0-go ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Li Yes E N ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections /❑Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes I J 1V o ❑ NA Li NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility_Number: - if/ Date of Inspection: 9' jam- 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1�No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 2io ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑/ co ❑ NA ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Rio l`'o El NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes I i o ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage.Pond El Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Ifr<o ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? El Yes .I No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer:to question#)_Explain any YES answers°and/or any additional recommendat►ons or any other:comments I1se-draWvings1offfacility to better,explainsituations(use a dilitional.pages as necessary) n ,„ a M'o0 dPa-k--d---777"L- - Reviewer/Inspector Name: U'-� (<7 ''>j-�— Phone: V3 19 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �- Date: 2 i3 3,07,0 Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015