820047_Inspection_20200619

J •
5 xvasi*on o£Water Resources
i ac�hty Npmlier "' '� ell ; 0 Division of Sod a io- p,z ft and Water Conse atlon � � iC OthrAgny h 1
g�
Type of Visit: G Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency '0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 11`�r�4t-,Z¢ Arrival Time: l�f S ,� Departure Time: L:�s' 77 County: %hiiz Pso Region: r9
Farm Name: 1 yl'oW4,, "'L r )4 /-8 V 4 c4 Owner Email:
Owner Name: 606 7 Ofl,- -on Phone:
•
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: t� P i
Facility Contact: 1 d ( i O? t Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: {{ Integrator: { ret' I.-te,
Certified Operator: ` Certification Number: i t /7 O
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: • Latitude: Longitude:
•
•
Design Current Design C went ; Design Current
Swore Capacity mop Wetoultry Capacity PQp Cattle Capacity 1'op�8
Wean to Finish _ Layer , Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 7 Non Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish SA, f,Z(4,6G _ Dairy Heifer .
Farrow to Wean ,Dcsign Cadent Dry Cow
f° Farrow to Feeder lD Eoult Ca.aci aPo Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish El La ers Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers Beef Feeder
Boars �.El Pullets Beef Brood Cow
s :"• -
Other Turke Poults -- �
Other .- II Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts •
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
•
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No © A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [Et'1�A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) - ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑-QA'❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: g `L- L/7 Date of Inspection: /'q
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: A r��
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): oC (G PIN/
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 121Crii ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Q4\l'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes []'�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes LD o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes []N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑,Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C fact'
13. Soil Type(s): ,c� (.40[.,Si1 41',
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those desigifated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ©'1`l0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check El Yes [ o ❑ NA n NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [N ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste.Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall 0 Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes ['o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 6 2_, Date of Inspection: /7
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [v]l oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes E'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes L J4< ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes In 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes - 1.o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ONO ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes El/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Cel 11)L4i t t( 9 '7 v17
s (A,d7e., c-
& (Lel S-1 1°
5 0 — P &A
- e r s
fg—tb e9 P 3,
F I / sk
bw L Q
l,l 7/o tip'- g SI
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ,\-) tiJ.(A/1,LQ Phone: lib 433:J 33'f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: sc..c ftl4Jf) Date: f l zicui- Z 0
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015