20201606 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20201207

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20201606
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Connelly Creek Apartments
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Benjamin Cuevas
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
12/7/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Taggart Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
C (from source to Sugar Creek)
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.221458
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID#
20201606
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
12/14/2020
Longitude:
-80.914787
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
Pre -Filing Time Clock has been reached for Connelly Creek Apartments - 20201606 Ver 1.msg
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
A. Processing Information
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Version
1
161.5KB
51.53KB
County (or Counties) where the project is located:

Mecklenburg
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
r No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Ild. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
Ile. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record onlyfor DWR 401 Certification:
For the record onlyfor Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
t^ Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Connelly Apartments, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book 35342 / Page 464 through page 469
2c. Responsible party:
Benjamin Cuevas
2d.Address
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

Street Address
4601 Charlotte Park Drive, Suite 350
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28217
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
James Cutler
4b. Business Name:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100
Address Une 2
city
Charlotte
Fbstal / Zip Code
28208
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
AGENT_AUTHORIZATION_FORM_exe. pdf
State / Province / Regim
NC
country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
28.89KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Charlotte
Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
See attached property ownership documents
7.376
2c. Project Address
Street Address
4350 Connelly Circle
Address Una, 2
CKY
State / Province / Region
Charlotte
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28208
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Taggart Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C (from source to Sugar Creek)
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*

Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501030103
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project site primarily comprises mixed pine -hardwood forest. Open land (mowed areas and areas not maintained) and a residential lot with single dwelling also occur on site. The
surrounding land use includes commercial and residential development. Connelly Circle bisects the project site. Access to the project site is from the southeast via Morris Field Drive.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes IT No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Figure 1 - Topo.pdf 620.08KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
NRCS WSS attachment.pdf 1.65MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.044
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
435
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is the development of 78 units of affordable housing on 7.376 acres in Charlotte, North Carolina.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The unit mixof the residential development would be a variety of 1, 2 and 3-bedroom garden style apartments, and townhomes serving tenants across multiple income ranges. As part
of the acquisition, there are 2 single-family structures
that would require demolition, all of which are vacant. The need for this project would serve to
decrease Charlotte's deficit of affordable housing units, in an area of the City in dire need for quality
affordable housing at diverse income ranges for various family sizes.
Equipment to be used for the development of the project site (clearing and grading activities) Will
include, but not limited to, bulldozer, backhoe, trackhoe excavator, motor grader, dump truck, and
utility truck.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
FINAL CAP final civil.pdf 2.45MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2020-01352
Sc. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): James Cutler, PWS
Agency/Consultant Company: Wood EMS (consultant)
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
USACE SAW-2020-01352; Notification of Jurisdictional Determination issued on 8/512020.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
SAW-2020-01352 (signed PJD).pdf 1.24MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory

1. Impacts Summary
f a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands W Streams -tributaries
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
r Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type* :1 3f. Type ofwidth * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1 building/parking Permanent Culvert S1 Intermittent Corps 5 287
Average (feet) (linearfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts: 31. Total temporary stream impacts:
287 0
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
287
3j. Comments:
See attached Plan View drawing (Figure A) and Cross-section stream drawing (Figure B).
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation U
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The impact to the jurisdictional stream channel will be limited to the proposed work area and no adjacent wetlands or streams will be disturbed. The
two wetland areas within the project site will not be impacted; i.e., the project has been designed to avoid jurisdictional wetland areas.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Contractor to install erosion and sediment control measures in accordance with applicable state regulations.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
r DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
r Mitigation bank W Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
r Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
287
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
cool
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
287 feet stream impact at proposed 1:1 mitigation ratio. Mitigation ratio not confirmed with USACE or NCDWR as yet. NC SAM Field Assessment Form
attached.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
Ia. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No

If no, explain why:
The project is not adjacent to protected NC Riparian Buffers (Riparian Buffer Rules).
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r- Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r- No
Comments:
The City of Charlotte Will be reviewing the Stormwater Management Plan. The Stormwater Management Plan for this project Will include Water Quality treatment, Channel Protection, and
Detention.
Overall percent imperviousness of the project is 24%.
G. Supplementary Information U
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r- Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r- Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r- Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
A review of potential cumulative impacts from site development and post -construction residential occupation indicates that the proposed action would
not have significant cumulative adverse effects on the human or natural environment, including downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r- Yes r- Nor WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r- Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r- Yes r No r- Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r- Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r- No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r- Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r- Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r- Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
See attached USFWS project consultation letter response, dated November 20, 2019 (Log No. 4-2-20-060)
Consultation Documentation Upload

FWS_20-060_Connelly Creek Apartments HUD Project_ Mecklenburg Co.pdf 341.71 KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Fisheries, Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
See attached SHPO letter response, dated December 2, 2019 (ER 19-3178) and Catawba Indian Nation letter response, dated December 4, 2019.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SHPO ER 19-3178.pdf 96.45KB
THPO response letter.pdf 172.6KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes
r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Map 3710452400K, effective on 9/2/2015
Miscellaneous
Comments
Additional documents and graphics attached (uploaded below) to this EPCN application include the following:
--- Aerial photograph of project site, pre -development (with wetland and stream features depicted)
--- Plan View Drawing - Figure A
--- Cross-section Drawing (Stream S1) - Figure B
--- Stream Identification Form for Stream S1
--- NC SAM Stream Assessment Form for Stream S1
--- Property Ownership Information (Property Record Cards and Deed)
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Aerial photograph of project site.pdf
282.62KB
Connelley_Creek_FIG_A.pdf
2.26MB
Connelly_Creek_FIG _B_20201201.pdf
463.09KB
NCDWQ Stream Identification form -Stream S1.pdf
608.19KB
NCSAM_Field Assessment Form - Stream S1 Connelly Creek S1_11.02.2020.pdf
116.75KB
Property Ownership Information for PCN.pdf
3.43MB
Signature
*
B By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
James Cutler
Signature
rim a
Date
12/7/2020

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Deed Bk. 35342 Pages 464-469
LOT NO.
PLAN NO.
PARCEL ID:
11508612; 11508619; 11508613
11508611;11508623;11508610
STREET ADDRESS: Carolina Avenue; 4348, 4336 & 4350 Connelly Circle; 4435 Golf Acres Drive
4226 Morris Field Drive, Charlotte, NC 28208
Please print:
Property Owner:
Property Owner:
Connelly Apartments, LLC
Property Owner Representative = Mr. Benjamin Cuevas
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
James Cutler
(Contractor / Agent)
of Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.
(Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
4601 Charlotte Park Drive, Suite 350, Charlotte, NC 28217
Telephone:
[phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature AuthorizeK Signature dui •4, i = ripr� f yes dew+
Date: Date: i Z- / l I Z 0 ZU

Table 1: Proposed Connelly Creek Apartments
Current Ownership Information

Tax
Parcel ID Address Current Property
Owner
Property Owner
Address Deed Book-Page Deed Date Acres
11508612 Carolina Avenue
Connelly
Apartments, LLC

4601 Charlotte Park
Drive, Suite 350,
Charlotte, NC 28217
35342-464 November 20,
2020 7.376
11508619 4348 Connelly Circle
11508613 4336 Connelly Circle
11508611 4350 Connelly Circle
11508623 4435 Golf Acres
Drive
11508610 4226 Morris Field
Drive 35342-467

B35342 - P 464
For Registration
Fredrick Smith
Register of Deeds
Mecklenburg County, NC
Electronically Recorded
2020 Nov 20 05:38 PM RE Excise Tax: $ 0.00
Book: 35342 Page: 464 - 466 Fee: $ 26.00
Instrument Number: 2020196824
NORTH CAROLINA NON -WARRANTY DEED
Excise Tax: Exempt
Parcel Identifier No, 115-086-1I: 115-086-13: 11 086-13:115-086-19. 115-086-23).
Verified by Mecklenburg Cotmly on the day of November, 2020_
Mail/Box to: Brockmann Law. 17250 Lancaster Highway, Suite 608, Charlotte -North. Carolina 28277
This instrument was prepared by: Todd C. Brockmann. Esq.
Brief description for the Index: 4 parcels on Connelly Circle and I parcel on Cold Acres Drive, Charlotte, NC
THIS DEED made this day of November. 2020, by and between
GRANTOR
CONNELLY CIRCLE, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company
256 Victoria Avenue
Charlotte, NC 28202
GRANTEE
CONNELLY APARTMENTS, LLC,
a forth Carolina limited liability company
4601 Charlotte Park Drive, Suite 350
Charlotte, NC 28217
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context, 4
WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and
by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot, parcel of land or condominium
unit situated in the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County. North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instruments recorded in Book 32361, Page 941; Book 32361. Page
834; Book 32361, Page 889, Book 32361, (sage 946: Book 32362. Page 62. Mecklenburg County Registry.
All or a portion of the property herein conveyed DOES NOT the primary residence of Grantor,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee
in fee simple.
Grantor makes no warranty, express or implied, as to title to the property hereinabove described.
Was: t (A-3
submitted electronically by "The Brockmann Law Firm"
in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordable documents
and the terms of the submitter agreement with the Mecklenburg county Register of Deeds.

B35342 - P 465
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above written.
SELLER:
CONNELLY CIRCLE LLC,
a North Carol' it liability company
By: "
Chris Oguurin Manager
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
I, I-« 11man a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that CHRIS
OGUNRINDE, either being personally known to me or proven by satisfactory evidence, personally appeared before me this day and
acknowledged that he is the Manager of CONNELLY CIRCLE, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, and being duly
authorized to do so, voluntarily executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes stated therein -
Witness
�'vitness my hand and official stamp or seal, this 17 day of November, 2020.
T
Notary PtWic
pit
Page 2 of 3

B35342 - P 466
Exhibit A
Legal Description
Lying, being and situate in the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, State of North Carolina, all that certain
tract containing approximately 7.376 acres and more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a calculated point located within Morris Field Drive (150' Public R/W), said point being a
common corner with now or formerly Eleanor A. Harris (Deed Bk. 32715, Pg. 925), thence continuing with
said road the following three (3) calls: (1) S 33°53'37" W 273.62 feet to a calculated point; (2) S 33°14'20"
W 66.63 feet to a calculated point; (3) S 32°05'20" W 112.51 feet to a calculated point, said point being a
common corner with the property of now or formerly Hargrove Property, LLC (Deed Bk. 26900, Pg. 958);
thence leaving said road, N 40°26'55" W passing a %z" rebar on line at 47.04 feet for a total of 283.92 feet to
a 1" rebar; thence N 40°38'58" W passing a 1-1/2" pipe east of the property line at 131.65 feet for a total of
165.49 feet to a %" pipe; thence N 40126'48" W 105.06 feet to a 5/8" rebar; thence N 40°16'37" W, passing a
3/4" pipe east of the property line at 211.06 feet for a total of 405.92 feet to a 5/8" rebar, said rebar being a
common comer with the property of now or formerly Horizon Properties, LLC (Deed Bk. 3 093 9, Pg. 1) 8) and
now or formerly Smith Holdings, Inc. (Deed Bk. 10334, Pg. 410); thence with the property of now or formerly
Smith Holdings, Inc. (Deed Bk. 10334, Pg. 410), N 04024'35" E 145.30 feet to a bent 5/8" rebar, said rebar
being a common corner with the property of now or formerly Bodenhamer NC Properties, LLC (Deed Bk.
24855, Pg. 746); thence with the property of now or formerly Bodenhamer NC Properties, LLC (Deed Bk.
24855, Pg. 746) S 89°09'50" E 214.36 feet to a %" pipe, said pipe being a common comer with now or formerly
Lunsford & Cope, LLC (Deed Bk. 16890, Pg. 123); thence with the property of now or formerly Lunsford &
Cope, LLC (Deed Bk. 16890, Pg. 123) the following three (3) calls: (1) S 86°19'04" E 225.34 feet to an axle;
(2) S 55°35' 12" E 152.99 feet to a ''/z" rebar; (3) S 42°17'47" W 44.90 feet to a %" pipe, said pipe being a
common corner with now or formerly Charlie Herron (Deed Bk. 3606, Pg. 499); thence with the property of
now or formerly Charlie Herron (Deed Bk. 3606, Pg. 499) and now or formerly Catherine Dulin (Deed Bk.
3717, Pg. 21), S 59°20'08" W 85.86 feet to a I" pinched pipe, said pipe being a common corner with now or
formerly James Paul Sturdivant (Deed Bk. 32620, Pg. 718); thence with the property of now or formerly James
Paul Sturdivant (Deed Bk. 32620, Pg. 718) the following two (2) calls: (1) S 56°20'35" W 39.05 feet to a %"
pipe; (2) S 60°16'33" E 169.84 feet to a set %x" rebar, said rebar being located on the western right-of-way of
Connelly Circle (30' Public R/W); thence with the wester right-of-way of Connelly Circle (30' Public R/W)
S 33043'25" W 139.67 feet to a %" rebar; thence through said right-of-way the following three (3) calls: (1) S
04049'20" W 45.68 feet to a %" pipe; (2) S 37034'39" E 22.86 feet to a calculated point; (3) N 42°07'19" E
21.44 feet to a set %" rebar, said rebar being a common corner with now or formerly Lois Watt (Deed Bk.
3834, Pg. 597) thence with the property of now or formerly Lois Watt (Deed Bk. 3834, Pg. 597), S 47046'45"
E 120.34 feet to a 3/" pipe; thence with the property of now or formerly Lois Watt (Deed Bk. 3834, Pg. 597),
now or formerly Thot Phrasayavong (Deed Bk. 32762, Pg. 844) and now or formerly Eleanor Harris (Deed
Bk. 32583, Pg. 902), N 42°07' 19" E, passing a 5/8" rebar on line at 67.89 feet, a V rebar on line at 127.83
for a total of 178.00 feet to a set %z" rebar, said rebar being a common comer with now or formerly Eleanor A.
Harris (Deed Bk. 32715, Pg. 925); thence with the property of now or formerly Eleanor Harris (Deed Bk.
32583, Pg. 902), S 52°35'07" E, passing a set %z" rebar on line at 110.58 feet for a total of 161.79 feet to the
POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 7.376 AC.
Page 3 of 3

B35342 - P 467
For Registration
Fredrick Smith
Register of Deeds
Mecklenburg County, NC
Electronically Recorded
2020 Nov 20 05:38 PM RE Excise Tax: $ 0.00
Book: 35342 Page: 467 - 469 Fee: $ 26.00
Instrument Number: 2020196825
NORTH CAROLINA NON -WARRANTY DEED
Excise Tax: Exempt
Parcel Identifier No. 115-086-10 Verified by Mecklenburg County on
Mail/Box to: Brockmann Law, 17250 Lancaster Highway Suite 608, Charlotte. North Carolina 28277_ _
This instrument was prepared by: Todd C. Brockmann Esg.
Brief description for the Index: 4226 Morris Field Drive Charlotte. NC 28208
THIS DEED made this day of November, 2020, by and between
GRANTOR
MONICA REID, unmarried
GRANTEE
CONNELLY APARTMENTS, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company
4601 Charlotte Park Drive, Suite 350
Charlotte, NC 28217
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shal I include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and
by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot, parcel of land or condominium
unit situated in the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instruments recorded in Book 30768, Page 484 and Correction
Deed in Book 33531, Page 534, Mecklenburg County Registry.
All or a portion of the property herein conveyed DOES NOT the primary residence of Grantor.
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 154, Mecklenburg County Registry.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee
in fee simple_
Grantor makes no warranty, express or implied, as to title to the property hereinabove described_
Page 1 00
submitted electronically by "The Brockmann Law Firm"
in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordable documents
and the terms of the submitter agreement with the Mecklenburg county Register of Deeds.

B35342 - P 468
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above written.
SELLER:
j f MONICA REID, unmarried
STATE OF L)nrk-Vt
COUNTY OF w
1, �ct.f[. -, �, .;y,-,�! �zc� �� C� , a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that MONICA REID,
either being personally known to me or proven by satisfactory evidence, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged
the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes stated therein.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this i7 t` day of November, 2020.
Notary Public =
Pagc 2 of 3

B35342 - P 469
Exhibit A
Legal Description
Lying, being and situate in the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, State ofNorth Carolina, all that certain
tract containing approximately 7.376 acres and more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a calculated point located within Morris Field Drive (150' Public R/W), said point being a
common corner with now or formerly Eleanor A. Harris (Deed Bk. 32715, Pg. 925), thence continuing with
said road the following three (3) calls: (1) S 33°53'3T' W 273.62 feet to a calculated point; (2) S 33°14'20"
W 66.63 feet to a calculated point; (3) S 32°05'20" W 112.51 feet to a calculated point, said point being a
common comer with the property of now or formerly Hargrove Property, LLC (Deed Bk. 26900, Pg. 958);
thence leaving said road, N 40126'55" W passing a %z" rebar on line at 47.04 feet for a total of 283.92 feet to
a 1" rebar, thence N 40138'58" W passing a 1-1/2" pipe east of the property line at 131.65 feet for a total of
165.49 feet to a'/a" pipe; thence N 40°26'48" W 105.06 feet to a 518" rebar; thence N 40°16'3T' W, passing a
3/4" pipe east of the property line at 211.06 feet for a total of 40592 feet to a 5/8" rebar, said rebar being a
common corner with the property of now or formerly Horizon Properties, LLC (Deed Bk. 30939, Pg.118) and
now or formerly Smith Holdings, Inc. (Deed Bk. 10334, Pg. 410); thence with the property of now or formerly
Smith Holdings, Inc. (Deed Bk. 10334, Pg. 410), N 04024'35" E 145.30 feet to a bent 5/8" rebar, said rebar
being a common corner with the property of now or formerly Bodenhamer NC Properties, LLC (Deed Bk.
24855, Pg. 746); thence with the property of now or formerly Bodenhamer NC Properties, LLC (Deed Bk.
24855, Pg. 746) S 89009'50" E 214.36 feet to a 3/4" pipe, said pipe being a common corner with now or formerly
Lunsford & Cope, LLC (Deed Bk. 16890, Pg. 123); thence with the property of now or formerly Lunsford &
Cope, LLC (Deed Bk. 16890, Pg. 123) the following three (3) calls: (1) S 86°19'04" E 225.34 feet to an axle;
(2) S 55035' 12" E 152.99 feet to a V2" rebar; (3) S 42°17'4T' W 44.90 feet to a 3/4" pipe, said pipe being a
common corner with now or formerly Charlie Herron (Deed Bk. 3606, Pg. 499); thence with the property of
now or formerly Charlie Herron (Deed Bk. 3606, Pg. 499) and now or formerly Catherine Dulin (Deed Bk.
3717, Pg. 21), S 59°20'08" W 85.86 feet to a 1" pinched pipe, said pipe being a common corner with now or
formerly James Paul Sturdivant (Deed Bk. 32620, Pg. 718); thence with the property of now or formerly James
Paul Sturdivant (Deed Bk. 32620, Pg. 718) the following two (2) calls: (1) S 56°20'35" W 39.05 feet to a 3/4"
pipe; (2) S 60°16'33" E 169.84 feet to a set %2" rebar, said rebar being located on the western right-of-way of
Connelly Circle (30' Public R/W); thence with the western right-of-way of Connelly Circle (30' Public R/W)
S 33043'25" W 139.67 feet to a 3/4" rebar; thence through said right-of-way the following three (3) calls: (1) S
04049'20" W 45.68 feet to a 3/" pipe; (2) S 37034'39" E 22.86 feet to a calculated point; (3) N 42107'19" E
21.44 feet to a set %,Z" rebar, said rebar being a common corner with now or formerly Lois Watt (Deed Bk.
3834, Pg. 597) thence with the property of now or formerly Lois Watt (Deed Bk. 3834, Pg. 597), S 47°46'45"
E 120.34 feet to a 3/4" pipe; thence with the property of now or formerly Lois Watt (Deed Bk. 3834, Pg. 597),
now or formerly Thot Phrasayavong (Deed Bk. 32762, Pg. 844) and now or formerly Eleanor Harris (Deed
Bk. 32583, Pg. 902), N 42*07' 19" E, passing a 518" rebar on line at 67.89 feet, a 3/a" rebar on line at 127.83
for a total of 178.00 feet to a set %2" rebar, said rebar being a common corner with now or formerly Eleanor A.
Harris (Deed Bk. 32715, Pg. 925), thence with the property of now or formerly Eleanor Harris (Deed Bk.
32583, Pg. 902), S 52035'07" E, passing a set'/z" rebar on line at 110.58 feet for a total of 161.79 feet to the
POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 7.376 AC.
Page 3 43

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 11508612 CONNELLY APARTMENTS LLC Total Appraised Value
CAROLINA AV CHARLOTTE NC 4601 CHARLOTTE PARK DR STE 350 $127,400
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
A500
Neighborhood
AP09
Land Use Desc
MULTI FAMILY
Land
123175 SQUARE FEET
Exemption/Deferment
-
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
12/22/2017
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
$65,000
Special District
NA
Legal Description
NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$127,400
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$127,400
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area - Year Built - Built Use / Style
Story Heat - Fuel
Foundation External Wall - Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s) - Half Bath(s) - Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt) -
Xrkk
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
A500 123175 SQUARE FEET AP09 $127,400
FEATURES
No data to display.
RECENT SALES HISTORY
The sales history includes only qualified sales made since January 1, 2016. A sale is qualified when it has been verified, by the
appraiser, as an arm's length transaction for fair market value. Only qualified sales are considered in the appraisal process. For a
complete history of sales and other transfers, please visit Polaris. The Register of Deeds records, indexes, and stores all real estate
related documents that are presented for registration.
Sale Date Sale Price LUC at Sale Legal Reference Deed Type Sold as Vacant Grantor Grantee
12/22/2017 $65,000 A500 32361-884 WARRANTY DEED Yes WELLS NOLIE ESTATE CONNELLY CIRCLE LLC
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$127,400
12/13/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$92,100
03/17/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$92,100
02/15/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$92,100

200 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data
herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 11508619
CONNELLY APARTMENTS LLC
8 CONNELLY CR
CHARLOTTE
4601 CHARLOTTE PARK DR STE 350
NC
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
A500
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc
MULTI FAMILY
Land
Exemption/Deferment
-
Municipality
Last Sale Date
12/22/2017
Fire District
Last Sale Price
$68,000
Special District
Legal Description
NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area 735 Year Built
Story
Foundation
Full Bath(s)
Total (SgFt)
Will\1
Total Appraised Value
$88,100
AP09
33106 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
1967 Built Use / Style
1 STORY Heat FORCED AIR - NOT Fuel
DUCTED
CRAWL SPACE External Wall FACE BRICK Fireplace(s)
1 Half Bath(s) Bedroom(s)
735
$49,700
$38,000
$400
$88,100
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
GAS
2
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
A500 33106 SQUARE FEET AP09 $49,700
FEATURES
Year Built Type Quantity Units Value
1967 TERRACE I1 15 $100
1967 SHED ti 80 $300
RECENT SALES HISTORY
The sales history includes only qualified sales made since January 1, 2016. A sale is qualified when it has been verified, by the
appraiser, as an arm's length transaction for fair market value. Only qualified sales are considered in the appraisal process. For a
complete history of sales and other transfers, please visit Polaris. The Register of Deeds records, indexes, and stores all real estate
related documents that are presented for registration.
Sale Date Sale Price LUC at Sale Legal Reference Deed Type Sold as Vacant Grantor Grantee
12/22/2017 $68,000 A500 32361-946 WARRANTY DEED No WOODS JUSTINE C CONNELLY CIRCLE LLC

VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
01/15/2019
01 /10/2015
02/04/2011
01/02/2003
200 ft
Disclaimer
Effective for Tax Year
2019
2011
2011
2003
Reason for Change
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
u
New Value
$88,100
$71,800
$78,700
$58,900
P(
4
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data
herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 11508613 CONNELLY APARTMENTS LLC Total Appraised Value
NC 6 CONNELLY CR CHARLOTTE 4601 CHARLOTTE PARK DR STE 350 $52,400
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
A500
Neighborhood
AP09
Land Use Desc
MULTI FAMILY
Land
34935 SQUARE FEET
Exemption/Deferment
-
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
12/22/2017
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
$46,000
Special District
NA
Legal Description
M2020-452
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$52,400
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$52,400
No buildings to show.
wkk
Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
A500 34935 SQUARE FEET AP09 $52,400
FEATURES
No data to display.
RECENT SALES HISTORY
The sales history includes only qualified sales made since January 1, 2016. A sale is qualified when it has been verified, by the
appraiser, as an arm's length transaction for fair market value. Only qualified sales are considered in the appraisal process. For a
complete history of sales and other transfers, please visit Polaris. The Register of Deeds records, indexes, and stores all real estate
related documents that are presented for registration.
Sale Date Sale Price LUC at Sale Legal Reference Deed Type Sold as Vacant Grantor Grantee
12/22/2017 $46,000 A500 32361-889 WARRANTY DEED No WOODS WILLIE LEWIS & CONNELLY CIRCLE LLC
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$52,400
01/10/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$70,700
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$78,200
01/02/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$48,300

100 ft
Disclaimer
1
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data
herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 11508611 CONNELLY APARTMENTS LLC
NC 0 CONNELLY CR CHARLOTTE 4601 CHARLOTTE PARK DR STE 350
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
A500
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc
MULTI FAMILY
Land
Exemption/Deferment
-
Municipality
Last Sale Date
12/22/2017
Fire District
Last Sale Price
$25,000
Special District
Legal Description
NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
- Year Built
Story
- Heat
Foundation
- External Wall
Full Bath(s)
- Half Bath(s)
Total (SgFt)
-
LAND
Use Units
Type
A500 45302
SQUARE FEET
FEATURES
No data to display.
Total Appraised Value
$68,000
AP09
45302 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
- Built Use / Style
- Fuel
- Fireplace(s)
- Bedroom(s)
Neighborhood
AP09
Assessment
$68,000
$68,000
$0
$0
$68,000
RECENT SALES HISTORY
The sales history includes only qualified sales made since January 1, 2016. A sale is qualified when it has been verified, by the
appraiser, as an arm's length transaction for fair market value. Only qualified sales are considered in the appraisal process. For a
complete history of sales and other transfers, please visit Polaris. The Register of Deeds records, indexes, and stores all real estate
related documents that are presented for registration.
Sale Date Sale Price LUC at Sale Legal Reference Deed Type Sold as Vacant Grantor Grantee
12/22/2017 $25,000 A500 32361-941 WARRANTY DEED Yes WELLS JAMES ALBERT CONNELLY CIRCLE LLC
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$68,000
12/13/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$32,000
03/17/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$32,000
04/21/2010
2010
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$34,300
02/15/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$37,500

d �r
200 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data
herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 11508623 CONNELLY APARTMENTS LLC Total Appraised Value
4435 GOLF ACRES DR 4601 CHARLOTTE PARK DR STE 350 $40,500
CHARLOTTE NC CHARLOTTE NC 28217
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
A500
Neighborhood
AP09
Land Use Desc
MULTI FAMILY
Land
27007 SQUARE FEET
Exemption/Deferment
-
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
12/22/2017
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
$22,000
Special District
NA
Legal Description
NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$40,500
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$40,500
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area - Year Built - Built Use / Style
Story - Heat - Fuel
Foundation - External Wall - Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s) - Half Bath(s) - Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt) -
X"k
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
A500 27007 SQUARE FEET AP09 $40,500
FEATURES
No data to display.
RECENT SALES HISTORY
The sales history includes only qualified sales made since January 1, 2016. A sale is qualified when it has been verified, by the
appraiser, as an arm's length transaction for fair market value. Only qualified sales are considered in the appraisal process. For a
complete history of sales and other transfers, please visit Polaris. The Register of Deeds records, indexes, and stores all real estate
related documents that are presented for registration.
Sale Date Sale Price LUC at Sale Legal Reference Deed Type Sold as Vacant Grantor Grantee
12/22/2017 $22,000 A500 32362-62 WARRANTY DEED No WELLS NOLIE %WILLETTE CONNELLY CIRCLE LLC
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$40,500
12/13/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$18,900
03/17/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$18,900
04/21/2010
2010
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$20,300
02/15/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$23,500

200 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data
herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 11508610 CONNELLY APARTMENTS LLC
4226 MORRIS FIELD DR 4601 CHARLOTTE PARK DR STE 350
CHARLOTTE NC CHARLOTTE NC 28217
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code A500
Land Use Desc MULTI FAMILY
Exemption/Deferment
Last Sale Date
Last Sale Price
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Story
Foundation
Full Bath(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
A500 13503.6
FEATURES
No data to display.
Neighborhood
Land
Municipality
Fire District
Special District
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Total Appraised Value
$33,800
AP09
13503.6 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
- Year Built - Built Use / Style
- Heat - Fuel
- External Wall - Fireplace(s)
- Half Bath(s) - Bedroom(s)
Type
SQUARE FEET
Neighborhood
AP09
Assessment
$33,800
$33,800
$0
$0
$33,800
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$33,800
12/13/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$9,500
03/17/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$9,500
04/21/2010
2010
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$10,100
02/15/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$10,500

100 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data
herein, its use or interpretation.

Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
PREPARED BY:
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
DATE:
SITE TOPOCONNELLY CREEK APARTMENTSCONNELLY CIRCLE AND MORRIS FIELD DRIVECHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
Document Path: F:\AMEC_Projects\2019\6228-19-0528 HUD\ConnellyCreek\MXD\Topo.mxdPROJECT NO:6228200613
LM
7/27/2020
MM
7/27/2020
FIGURE:1
0 1,000 2,000Feet
¯
§¨¦521
§¨¦277
§¨¦16
§¨¦74
§¨¦77
§¨¦85
Legend
Site Boundary
PPI0200100Miles
D:\Connelly_Creek\Figure A Connelly Creek - Plan View - Copy.mxdCharlotte, NC
Job No. 6228200613
Drawn By: AB
Reviewed By: JC
Date: 12/1/2020
^_
Figure A. ConnellyCreek Apartments -Plan View
Legend
ProposedPermanentStream Impact =287 Linear FeetStream S1
PP Cross-Section
I 0 200100Miles
D:\Connelly_Creek\Figure B Connelly Creek - Cross Section.mxdCharlotte, NC
Job No. 6228200613
Drawn By: AB
Reviewed By: JC
^_
Figure B. ConnellyCreek Apartments -Cross-SectionStream S1
Connelly Creek XS
Feet
10095908580757065605550454035302520151050Feet697
696.5
696
695.5
695
694.5
694
693.5
693
692.5
692
Date: 12/1/2020
C
A
R
O
LIN
A
AV MORRIS FIELD DRCARLOTTA STCONNELLYCR11508623
11508611
11508619
11508612
11508610
11508613
PREPARED BY:
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
DATE:Document Path: F:\AMEC_Projects\2019\6228-19-0528 HUD\ConnellyCreek\MXD\Wetlandsupdate.mxdPROJECT NO:6228150528
LM
8/4/2020
JC
8/4/2020
FIGURE:2
0 200 400100Feet
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WITH WETLAND AND STREAM FEATURES AND POST-CONSTRUCTION BUFFERCONNELLY CREEK APARTMENTSCONNELLY CIRCLE AND MORRIS FIELD DRIVECHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
S1
Culvert
WB
WC
Post Construction Buffer
Observed Wetland
Observed Stream
Parcel
Site Boundary
3
ER
0 507530
35° 13 23' N
35° 13 14' N
597530 507570 507610 50765D 50789D 507730 507770
3
fV
ER Map Scale: 1:2,030 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Meters
N 0 30 60 120 180
el
/V
0 50 100 200 300
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
tJ5DA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
21111111111111111 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
Soil Map —Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
(Connelly Circle)
507570 507610 507650 507690 507730 507770 507810
507850 50789D
507810 507850 507890
v
507930 0
35' 1323' N
� 35' 1314' N
507930
3
7/27/2020
Page 1 of 3

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
0
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
10
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
lk
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
s
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
o
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
S
Sodic Spot
Soil Map —Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
(Connelly Circle)
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
+_"
Rails
rmo
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
N
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 19, Jun 4, 2020
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Oct 28, 2018—Oct
30, 2018
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
usD.A Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/27/2020
s� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map —Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Connelly Circle
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
MeB
MeD
Mecklenburg fine sandy loam,
2 to 8 percent slopes
3.7
3.0
55.4%
44.6%
Mecklenburg fine sandy loam,
8 to 15 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
6.7
100.0%
I�JSoa Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/27/2020
it Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

December 2, 2019

Matt Miller
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28208

Re: Demolish Four Houses & Construct Connelly Creek Apartments, Connelly Circle and Morris Field
Drive, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, ER 19-3178

Dear Mr. Miller:
Thank you for your letter of October 18, 2019, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.

The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
[e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,

Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer

Catawba Indian Nation
Tribal Historic Preservation office
1536 Tom Steven Road
Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730
Office 803-328-2427
Fax [phone]
December 4, 2019
Attention: Pamela Alexander
City of Charlotte
600 East Trade Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Re. THPQ # TCNS # Project Description
2020-939-1 Proposed Connelly Creek Apartments Project— Connelly Circle and Morris Field Drive
Dear Ms. Alexander
The Catawba have no immediate concerns with regard to traditional cultural properties,
sacred sites or Native American archaeological sites within the boundaries of the
proposed project areas. However, the Catawba are to be notified if Native American
artifacts and 1 or human remains are located during the ground disturbance phase
of this project.
If you have questions please contact Caitlin Rogers at 803-328-2427 ext. 226, or e-mail
caitlinh@a ccpperafts.com.
Sincerely,,
Wenonah G. Haire
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer

Strickland, Bev
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2020 12:01 AM
To: Cutler, James D
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Pre -Filing Time Clock has been reached for Connelly Creek Apartments - 20201606
Ver 1
Attachments: DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Please do not click on links/attachments unless you know the content is genuine and
safe.
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources has received the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form for Connelly Creek
Apartments that you submitted on 10/26/2020. The ID number for that project is 20201606, Version 1.
Your Pre -Filing Meeting Request has now reached the 30 calendar days' requirement and your application can now be
accepted.
When you submit your application please upload a copy of the attached document in this email.
This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond to this email address, as
responses are not monitored.
1

DWR Pre-Fil ing Meeting Req u est Form
ID#*Ve rsion *
Re gional Office *
Re v ie we r List *
Contact Name *
Contact Email Addre ss *
Proje ct Name *
Proje ct Owne r *
Proje ct County *
Owne r Addre ss:
Is this a transportation proje ct?*
Type (s) of approv al sought from the DWR:
Doe s this proje ct hav e an e xisting proje ct ID#?*
Do you know the name of the staff me mbe r you would like to re que st a me e ting with?
Ple ase giv e a brie f proje ct de scription be low.*
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
20201606 1
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Alan Johnson
Pre-Filing Me eting Reque st submitte d 10/26/2020
Jim Cutler
[e-mail]
Connelly Creek Apartments
Charlotte Mecklenburg Housing Partnership (Mr. Benjamin Cuevas)
Mecklenburg
City
Charlotte
State / Province / Region
NC
Postal / Zip Code
28217
Country
United States
Street Address
4601 Charlotte Park Drive
Address Line 2
Yes No
401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular
401 Water Quality Certification -
Express
Individual Permit Modification
Shoreline Stabilization
Yes No
Mecklenburg County Staff
Applicant proposes to construct multi family development and project
development would impact an intermittent stream channel as proposed. A
Pre Construction Notification will be submitted to the USACE for NWP 39
and DWR will also be copied on the submittal package
Ple ase attach the docume ntation you would like to hav e the me e ting about.
Signature
Submittal Date
11/9/2020
11/11/2020
11/16/2020
SAW-2020-01352 (signed PJD).pdf 1.24MB
FINAL QAP_final civil.pdf 2.45MB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:

· This form completes the requirement of the Pre-Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
· I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre-filing
meeting request.
· I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.

Your project’s thirty-day clock started upon receipt of this application.  You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary.  You will receive notification when the thirty-day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
10/26/2020
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

November 20, 2019

Pamela Alexander
Housing and Neighborhood Services
City of Charlotte
600 East Trade Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202

Dear Pamela Alexander:

Subject: Connelly Creek Apartments HUD Project; Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Log No. 4-2-20-060

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
correspondence dated November 4, 2019 wherein you solicit our comments regarding project-
mediated impacts to federally protected species and initiate informal consultation. We submit
the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321
et seq.); and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531-1543) (Act).

Project Description
According to the information provided, the proposed project would entail the construction of a
multi-family housing development on approximately 8 partially wooded acres in Charlotte,
North Carolina. Onsite habitats consist of successional forest, developed open spaces, and
transitional edge habitats. The site is also composed of existing residences, outbuildings, and
access roads. An unnamed tributary to Taggart Creek and wetland areas also occur onsite
suggesting that proposed work may require authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. Surrounding land use is dominated by commercial developments.

Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
According to Service records, suitable summer roosting habitat may be present in the project
area for the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). However, the
final 4(d) rule (effective as of February 16, 2016), exempts incidental take of northern long-eared
bat associated with activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known hibernation site,
and greater than 150 feet from a known, occupied maternity roost during the pup season (June 1
– July 31). Based on the information provided, the project (which may or may not require tree
clearing) would occur at a location where any incidental take that may result from associated
activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule. Alternatively, we believe the probability for take of
this species is insignificant and discountable and concur with your finding that the
proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect this species. Although not
2

required, we encourage the Applicant to avoid any associated tree clearing activities during the
maternity roosting season from May 15 – August 15.

The site was evaluated for federally protected plants known to occur in Mecklenburg County on
October 16, 2019, but no evidence for these species were detected at that time. Based on the
negative survey results collected during the optimal survey window for these plants, we have no
concerns for project-mediated impacts to these species. Additionally, we do not believe that
onsite stream habitats would support the federally endangered Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona
decorata). Therefore, we would not object to a “no effect” determination made by the
appropriate action agency for these species and we require no further action at this time.

Please be aware that obligations under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is
listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.

We offer the following general recommendations on behalf of natural resources:

Erosion and Sediment Control
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground-disturbing
activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing native vegetation
should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native vegetation as soon as the project is completed. Ground
disturbance should be limited to what will be stabilized quickly, preferably by the end of the
workday. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion control as synthetic
netting can trap animals and persist in the environment beyond its intended purpose.

Low Impact Development
We recommend that consideration be given to the use of pervious materials (i.e., pervious
concrete, interlocking/open paving blocks, etc.) for the construction of roads, driveways,
sidewalks, etc. Pervious surfaces minimize changes to the hydrology of the watershed and can
be used to facilitate groundwater recharge. Pervious materials are also less likely to absorb and
store heat and allow the cooler soil below to cool the pavement. Additionally, pervious concrete
requires less maintenance and is less susceptible to freeze/thaw cracking due to large voids
within the concrete.

Pollinator Habitat
We appreciate the incorporation of community garden areas into project design plans.
Pollinators, such as most bees, some birds and bats, or other insects, including moths and
butterflies, play a crucial role in the reproduction of flowering plants and in the production of
most fruits and vegetables. Over 75 percent of flowering plants and about 75 percent of crops
are pollinated by these pollinators. A recent study of the status of pollinators in North America
by the National Academy of Sciences found that populations of honey bees (which are not native
to North America) and many wild pollinators are declining. Declines in wild pollinators are a
3

result of loss, degradation, and fragmentation of habitat and disease; while declines in honey
bees has also been linked to disease.

The rusty-patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis) historically occurred in North Carolina’s
Mountain and Piedmont provinces. Although not required, we encourage the Applicant to
consider our recommendations below to benefit the rusty-patched bumble bee and other
pollinators. Moreover, the creation and maintenance of pollinator habitats at this site may
increase the value of the project for the community and help reduce the spread of invasive exotic
plants. Please consider the following:
1. Sow native seed mixes in disturbed areas or in designated pollinator areas with plants
that bloom throughout the entire growing season.
2. Taller growing pollinator plant species should be planted around the periphery of the
site and anywhere on the site where mowing can be restricted during the summer
months. Taller plants, left un-mowed during the summer, would provide benefits to
pollinators, habitat to ground nesting/feeding birds, and cover for small mammals.
3. Low growing/groundcover native species should be planted in areas that need to be
maintained. This would provide benefits to pollinators while also minimizing the
amount of maintenance such as mowing and herbicide treatment. Milk weed species
are an important host plant for monarch butterflies.
4. Avoid mowing of flowering plants. Designated pollinator areas show be mow only
50% of the plant height, but no lower than 8 inches.
5. Avoid mowing outside the active season for rusty-patched bumble bee and other
pollinators (April 15 – October 15).
6. Leave slash piles, mulch piles, or loose dirt piles along woodland edges. These areas
provide nesting habitats and/or nest materials for some pollinators.
7. Avoid the use of pesticides and specifically neonicotinoids.
8. Additional information regarding plant species, seed mixes, and pollinator habitat
requirements can be provided upon request.

The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 42225, if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-20-060.

Sincerely,

- - original signed - -

Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
Spa w s:
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: NOVewt �ep- o I
ProjectlSite:61?n tll Cry
Latitude:
Evaluator: ��Wt� i.�[fl+�
County: /i'teC�ClC++6ur
Longitud -
Total Points:
circle one)
Stream Determination'
Other �/A �
r
Stream is at least intermittent .4 r
if a 79 orperennial if z 30'
Ephemeral ntermittent erennial
e.g. Quad Name: W g Sf
A. Geomor hofo {subtotal = I y S }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
13 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2- Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3- In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
2
3
5- Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7- Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8- Headcuts
0
1)
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1-5
FIT Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
6. Hydrology (Subtotal = }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxldizing bacteria
10
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15- Sediment on plants or debris
0
0-5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
<Dl
1.5
17- Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
C. Biology Subtotal = v
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos {note diversity and abundance}
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
0-5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0-5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0-5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75, OBL = 1.5
Other
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: F;r*,e NOO. ►5:1-1 raDec
S. Z JC
Sketch: ?a$
POE
S!Z5`�
///CO VtO lti Grote,

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Connelly Creek 2. Date of evaluation: 10/23/2020
3. Applicant/owner name:
Charlotte Mecklenburg Housing
Partnership 4. Assessor name/organization: Laura Meyer/Wood E&IS
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Taggart Creek 7. River basin: Catawba
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.22246, 080.91595
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): S1 (Flag S1-2) 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 150
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 2-3 Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4-5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Connelly Creek Date of Assessment 10/23/2020
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization Laura Meyer/Wood E&IS

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2) Flood Flow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH HIGH
(4) Microtopography NA NA
(3) Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability LOW LOW
(4) Sediment Transport HIGH HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1) Water Quality LOW LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1) Habitat HIGH HIGH
(2) In-stream Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3) Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(3) Substrate HIGH HIGH
(3) Stream Stability LOW LOW
(3) In-stream Habitat HIGH HIGH
(2) Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3) Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall MEDIUM MEDIUM