820045_Inspection_20200327

�Oivision of Water Resources 3,
' Facility Number H� 5 }Q Division of Soil and Water rinservatron :; R
OtherRAgency -« , ,, _t
Type of Visit: ER , pliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access /)
Date of Visit: z7'Wl,r� Arrival Time: 8.3O Departure Time: in) County: � }'wI 1Lt egion: 1,�4-
Farm Name: Icy) I-e,S'eavt4e-vs j'C.c-trtt 1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: /GI Cw 1 Ca,04-‘ I a-v , 2 L-G Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 1144 I L VlCWb'5 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 1 1 Integrator: Ptis-csf61°-t'
Certified Operator: ---C,1 4f e-A. l .v--i'r✓, Certification Number: 1 7 81 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current --€n Design ,Current
Swine Capacity Pop _ -Wet,Poultry.Poultry - Capacity Fop Cattle Capacity, Pop
Wean to Finish _Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder ° Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 5g Qj(y� saa Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current = Dry Cow
- Farrow to Feeder - a -D ;-Poultry _Ca 1 aci _ Po, Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish La ers Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers Beef Feeder _
-
Boars •Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Other, •Turke Poults �.
; Other •Other,
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No IJKA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ®NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No fNNA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: j Z g Date of Inspection: a 41rem+
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes L Ne—❑NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): - I
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes C3-do❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes lalgir❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �i�e— ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑Tlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes laNtr❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C - t f is L 3
13. Soil Type(s): C (4,41
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [Pa-N-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [ To ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes laAtrr ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes -IVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 0- ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Erg; ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑wup ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ['Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1/1'1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers LI Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ( , L- 145- Date of Inspection: ' 7
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®'ICo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes p-Ntr ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [G-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues ��
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or'document ❑ Yes 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 121No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑—o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA El NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ['SNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
0.1 e,1 4t ( k izeotcvecto
‘01 Ctiq
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1,1 Phone P(b CRO .3 c(
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: dral,4A_ Date:en mvL 9-0A0
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015