820044_Inspection_20200715

Division of Water Resources. - 1itlitS lit:Tidy, x 4,
Facility Number 6 2 - ,-I fl 1 F 0 Division of Soil andaWater Conservation
. 0 Other Agency i�.J
Type of Visit: Go-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q4L outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
!J
Date of Visit: O R/ Arrival Time:Mira Departure Time: q o County: Si�t,tt��1 S '( Region:far
Farm Name: ( -cry 6 w ,.. ` f.S vl Owner Email:
Owner Name: + ! D i11.8c7o•— & 13 4. �;,�'TII Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: -
Facility Contact: C,. . lc i ,�, 4.--- Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: i/I.U Q
-s Certified Operator: 1( Certification Number: 7 7 7 13
Back-upOperator: _� 4? YL
p Certification Numbe : %a J -T
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
-Design Current --- Design Current ,_ C Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. �_Wet Poultry Capacity Pop; Cattle -.Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish ! Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 5'9. 4 t(7 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder .D -Poult Ca i aci Pot __. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish M -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars IN Pullets -- .`; Beef Brood Cow
Other Turke Poults
Other •Other •
Dischar2es and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure - ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ®,PEA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [K NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ErFlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: C' 2.2. L/t- Date of Inspection: f5 J k.( D-0 2-0
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? es L ' a NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o , ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): I lc
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes -o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes l'l< ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes IZI-.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [L'1 i 7 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ® ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes J o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? �/
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C.-0 `") S Q -' C 8
13. Soil Type(s): /Y
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [/ 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes R"1G0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes (O ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 2- i--f K' Date of Inspection: f.:5 . Jt j ot.0
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ( ❑ Yes ®-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [I'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®moo NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 121lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Quo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑t ❑ NA 0 NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [I.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Cct,(,"—f, , 27 --to
s gairec,„-1 .— 3_ 2:7, (c jp- q
o-- 3 0 C3 G
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �J(�vl I.cL p Phone: ono-tag,42, 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: • l e.fn Date: S 7,4a 0a.0
of Page 3 3 2/4/201