20100749 Ver 1_401 Application_20100910

FAST LANE
11010 RAVEN RIDGE ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27614
846-5900
PICKUP DATE PICKUP TIME 82$_0303
DRIVER # OF PIECES WEIGHT
BILL TO : SHIPPER RECEIVER 3RD PARTY
CAR VAN ROUND TRIP CHARGES _ - - = -?
TO
COMPANY NAME t Vl?; I
7 -') lam,:. e !l yr f r i7.?;
STREET ADDRESS JG ?,c j
. ,
CITY 4 , ? v-i ST <• ZIP ?
CONTACT NAME
PROJEgT PHONE #
SIGNATURE f::, - '_ ,.- PRINT DATE ! TIME ?y
PAID
VU
1??
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Jamie Shem
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
From: Nicole Thomson
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Milano Avenue Extension, Wake County, NC
r_ V
4 J
e4oirz'p
September 9, 2010
S&EC Project # 11267.P1
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Ian McMillan
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
On behalf of the owner, Eastman Development Companies, LLC, please find attached a complete application and supplemental
information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permits 29 and General Water Quality Certifications 3821.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Milano Avenue Extension
Project Type Road Extension
Owner / Applicant BOP Development, LLC
County Wake
Nearest Town Apex
Waterbod Name UT to Beaver Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03-06-05
Index Number 16-41-10{0.5)
Class WS-W; NSW
USGS Cataloging Unit 03030004
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.009
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.05
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.059
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 134
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
USGS Topographic Site Vicinity Map
NRCS Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Agent Authorization Form
DWQ Stream Determination letter (IP/RRO #09-177)
Overall Site Plan (24X63 -DWQ; 11X7 - USACE)
Impact Map Details
Two (2) Courtesy Copies of the Stonnwater Management Plan including supplemental worksheets, planting plan details,
calculations and design details (DWQ Only)
$240 Application Fee to DWQ
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
2 0 1 0 0 7 4 9
O?
OF W A
r?9QG
r
o r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number: 3821
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes El No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Milano Avenue Extension
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Apex
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: BOP Development LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 13837/0225
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Mr. Brad Zadell
3d. Street address: PO Box 1328
3e. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27512
3f. Telephone no.: 919-427-7106
3g. Fax no.: N/A
3h. Email address: N/A
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Applicant as listed on the Agent Authorization; please
copy agent (S&EC) on all correspondence
4b. Name: Mr. Brad Zadell
4c. Business name
(if applicable): BOP Development LLC
4d. Street address: PO Box 1328
4e. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27512
4f. Telephone no.: 919-427-7106
4g. Fax no.: N/A
4h. Email address: N/A
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Nicole J. Thomson
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5c. Street address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27614
5e. Telephone no.: [phone]
5f. Fax no.: [phone]
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0721657578
Latitude: 35.7148 Longitude: - 78.9092
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: +/- 11 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Beaver Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: 16-41-10-(0.5); WS-IV; NSW; 03-06-05
2c. River basin: Cape Fear River Basin (USGS Cataloging Unit 03030004)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The property is currently forested. The surrounding area is comprised of residential homes and the nearby Town of Apex
parkland.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.06
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
655
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct an extension of the existing Milano Avenue to provide access through the
subject property.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project will include a small amount (less than 1/10th acre) of jurisdictional riparian wetland impact one
permanent, perennial stream crossing of an unnamed tributary (UT) to Beaver Creek for the proposed Milano Avenue
extension. Milano Avenue currently stubs at the eastern property boundary. The applicant requires the single stream
crossing to access useable upland portions of the property. Further, the Town of Apex requires that the roadway be
constructed to the limits of the western property line. Equipment typical of roadway projects, including backhoes, graders,
etc. will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by
the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this
property / project (including all prior phases) in the past?
®Yes ? No ? Unknown
Comments: Mr. Martin Richmond (DWQ) conducted the
stream determination on July 9, 2009. See attached
Stream Determination letter (IP/RRO #09-177)
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what
type of determination was made?
The USACE has not been to this particular site. The ? Preliminary ? Final
Applicant is not contesting the nature of the features
delineated on the subject property.
4c. If yes
who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Soil and Environmental
, Consultants, PA
Name (if known): Mr. Chris Flowers Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Mr. Martin Richmond (DWQ) conducted the stream determination on July 9, 2009. See attached Stream Determination
letter (IP/RRO #09-177)
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained
for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 13
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ? T Road Fill
(permanent) Headwater
Forested Wetland ® Yes
? No ® Corps
? DWQ 0.05
? Yes ? Corps
W2 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ
?Yes ?Corps
W4 ?P?T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W5 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
W6 ? PEI T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.05
2h. Comments: The proposed wetland impacts associated with the Milano Avenue extension are necessary due to the
terminus of the existing Milano Avenue. The applicant cannot move the road to avoid the wetland impact.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ®P ? T Culvert UT to Beaver ® PER ® Corps 3 134
(permanent) Creek ? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 134
3i. Comments: The applicant is requesting one permanent, perennial stream crossing of an unnamed tributary (UT) to Beaver
Creek for the proposed Milano Avenue extension. Milano Avenue currently stubs at the eastern property boundary. The
applicant requires the single stream crossing to access useable upland portions of the property. Further, the Town of Apex
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
requires that the roadway be constructed to the limits of the western property line.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
0. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID 5b.

Proposed use or purpose 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
number of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 13
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse
?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g•
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream na me mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
?Yes
B1 ?P?T ? No
?Yes
B2 ?P?T ? No
?Yes
B3 ?P?T ? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: The proposed project is within the Cape Fear River Basin, therefore, there are currently no state regulated
buffer requirements that this project is subject to.
Page 7 of 13
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant requested a detailed delineation of streams and wetlands prior to site plan development in order
to determine the extent and location of streams and wetlands in the vicinity of the proposed crossing. The site
plan has limited permanent impacts to one road crossing on a perennial/important stream. Streams are not
crossed multiple times by roads. The proposed road crossing is necessary in order to access useable upland
portions of the property for development. Further, the Town of Apex requires that the roadway be constructed to
the limits of the western property line. The project also proposes only 0.05 acres of riparian wetland impact. This
wetland impact is unavoidable due to the location of the existing Milano Avenue at the eastern property boundary.
The applicant cannot move the road to avoid the wetland impact without crossing onto neighboring properties and
existing home-sites or creating an unacceptable curvature radius to the roadway.
The applicant is also aware of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide Permits 29. With respect
to residential development conditions (Regional Conditions section 4.9) the applicant does not anticipate any
impacts to streams or wetlands associated with stormwater facilities as there are none proposed, there are no
proposed single-family recreation facilities, there are no 100 year floodplain limits identified on this project and
therefore, there are no permanent wetland or stream fills proposed within the floodway and the stream
classification for this project is Water Supply (WS) IV; Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) (i.e. not Outstanding
Resource Waters or High Quality Waters).
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction of the proposed piped impact will consist of by-pass storm piping to ensure constant flow within the stream
is maintained. Orange protective silt fencing will be placed outside of the impacted wetland corridor to ensure protection
of the non-impacted wetland. It is the intent of this plan for construction impact to take place during the dryer months of
the year.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ? Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in-lieu fee program

pro
project?
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ? No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
1 6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The proposed project is within the Cape Fear River Basin, therefore, ? Yes ? No
there are currently no state regulated buffer requirements that this project is subject
to and as such, no diffuse flow plan is required.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 25.2%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan:
This project proposes 1 stromwater wet pond and 1 bio-retention area to treat the sto rmwater generated by the post-
development construction of the site. See attached Stormwater Calculations and narrative provided by Jones & Cnossen
Engineering, PLLC
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Apex
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ® NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ® Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
The stormwater management plan has been submitted to Mr. Michael Deaton with
the Town of Apex for review and Approval. Mr. Deaton will not release final
Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) Approval for submission to the NC DWQ until
the NC DWQ approves the project. We are therefore requesting a conditional 401
Approval so that we may supply that to the Town of Apex in order to get the final
SMP Approval. Once we have the final SMP Approval, we will forward it to the
Central Office. We have included two (2) courtesy copies of the plans and
supplemental information (see attached) submitted to Mr. Deaton and the Town of
Apex for your files.
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with roof of approval been ? Yes ? No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 11 of 13
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated
Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft
states that most residential subdivisions are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. This project does not meet any of the
three criteria of private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impacts. The proposed suburban in-fill development
is relatively small in nature, is within a residentially developed landscape bounded by existing home-sites and therefore,
the utility infrastructure (i.e. water and electricity) are already in place to service the proposed development. We
anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will connect to existing sewer lines. The Town of Apex will insure that the capacity of their treatment facility
will not be exceeded.
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC-Natural Heritage Programs Virtual Workroom was used to search for elemental occurrences of state and
federally protected species in the vicinity of the project. There were no elemental occurrences of federally threatened or
endangered species within 2 miles of the center of the project area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The proposed project is in Apex, Wake County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat that would support EFH (i.e.
salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
* Records checks at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State Archeology were not performed.
Utilizing Google Earth and NC National Register Points, the closest structure is the Calvin Wray Lawrence House which is
4 miles from the center of the project. No structures were noticed during the wetland evaluation. The project is
consistent with adjacent land uses.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http://www.ncfloodmaps.com/
Nicole J. Thomson September 9,
/ r 2010
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name / Applic ent's?ignature Date
(Agent's signature is valid oMy-if a.. a?HTbrization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Page 13 of 13

.x r 4 L
Ih6
I_
-7
?
Project No. FIGjure I - I :24K USGS
I 1 267.P I Topographic Quadrangle
Project Mgr.:
NT Milano Avenue Extenslon
Wake County, NC
I" = 2,000
09/09/10 New 11(11 Quadrangle
j Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
CrC2 Y 4r 567 CrB2/' `v ^' ! ?? C rE ?¢dU¢
r „

.ar
"
CrC2
'GE

V
µ?. n F CrB2
ek

'
x ? ?

?
•,

u C
!l k
Ws C2 CrC2" ° ' CtG
C

i ' ?• .
s
CrC ?,?.
.? ?; ? ?.

'( CrU
CrB? ., Cr62 MfD2
, CrB2 4
C
C
l r
2
\
°?
1
rC
•
M2 M C2
B WO

f

?
F ? MIC 2a • .. ' Cr ,
;

?
t
?
r
^

WSC2 QB A # ; ryp Y •

4 [a

o tD

MBC
0
aCr82 ?a

q

CrC C/laC

-
y 1

? °:. MtD2

a z
l

+
? m .

y

r

GrB2
?ww, k ??, : `r CtC CrN
?
4 f AtAi
u
4
'
.c? u +a
e t CrB2

C C

,

4 i uI
? t,
C

a'
F
"?
1
._-? .yy.
"( - art . ,. Y T
C`

W ,Ilu
"A Ro
u
y `
"+Y
J
y GZ Mt8
MfC
AtA
Wy s l
x 1 .. ?S M
4 {,Ae, i ? .,
i ,; ?
*; µY y a.
A,

° Z
?M
WC2 '
A. . ,

'
`
• M tcl
• ,• i 1C2
•;s '?t
?r ,{ ? Or C1 :' /, ` ` , -i ?4 e,. `Y ? /'
?
? 'fi `i
A '_, ` • '
? y
re E. • a,??.
? , r :?fyc .. / ;?„ f.
_ ?y ?

¢ ?: .,s •, * ?_ wsB2 ?? ; ? ` * qty. ? ? ,
CrC2 ?
\ rB w' MICA r i d ?, r. '.

40 `

i
?? M1Ci
° ?? fE3 vfc?

4 a rr ' W Mf8 ,

CrB2 rC
s• ?
3
?, W
s® t 2 rl
+
_ ,s , Y
,

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, Notch Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.,com
Name:P blt???o?M? LLL.
Address: f, a e?X 13Z s
Kc-
Phone: 4-7- 7i,>&
Project Name/Description: M t LPAD "V S&EC Project #- 12 (P Z. P
Date: MAru-A %I ZO (O
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: 1--1.2 TA M c E, S Rce tJ
Field Office: Q A L E t r t -t
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current landowner or municipal official hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental
Consultants, PA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon
request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The
?.,;,T_ day of
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
A ?op ?,.
Print Pr rty Owner's or Municipal Official's Name
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Pw Am U4 A &P Pr s
Property Own s or Municipal Official's Signature
cc Mrs. Nicole Thomson
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Charlotte Office-
236 UPhillip Court, Suile. C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: (704)",'20-9406
t ,remshoro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro. NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In B_y The Current Landowner or Municipal Official
Aja
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
November 17, 2009} r
Chris Flowers
Soil & Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Ridge Road f
Raleigh, NC 27614 F_ ?y: So?7 EntRrsif:enta?f ?d>fssulfarirs, f'%
Dee Freeman
Secretary
IP/RRO#09-177
Wake County
BASIN:
? Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233) ? Tar-Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
® Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination ? Isolated Wetland Determination
Project Name:
Bela Casa
Location/Directions: Subject site is located at northern end of Whistling Quail Run in Apex
Subject Stream: UT to Beaver Creek Cape Fear/Jordan Lake
Date of Determination: July 9, 2009
Feature E/1/P* Not
Subject Subject Start@ Stop@ Stream
Form Pts. Soil
Survey USGS
To o
A I n/a n/a Fla 200 X
B P n/a n/a Pond Outlet X X
C P n/a n/a Throughout X X
*Eil/P - Ephemera!/Intermittent/Perennial
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Quality.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water
exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a
determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Cyndi Karoly , DWQ
Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination
by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for
an ad judicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are
hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party (including None Carolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Bela Casa
Wake County
November 17, 2009
Page 2 of 2
downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ recommends that the applicant
conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask
for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This
determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
The (owner/future owners) should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property
(stated above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries
should be directed to the Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)-733-1786, and the US Army
Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-876-8441.
Respectfully,
Art-
Martin Rich nd
Environmen 1 Specialist
cc: Wetlands' Stormwater Branch, 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604
RRO/SWP File Copy

-?==
_ *,??
-? ? ?, ?
I ?, i l l ? ?
CK2
CrCx
WSC2
c
r.
t
CrC2 : `
,ArB2
• ? 1
CrB2
a '
19
sC
e
? IfI3
-
. ,
7% rL

6uluu111d puwl 13uawa6Qu8H uOgDngsuo:) I Buuo*U!&q 11AD tj $ A: ",? N`cf 1 d 9 V N I` '?] 4 M OIG CI NV J N 14 d?J J
OS
011d ?JN12133NIJN3? '+nOa"" 'AlmnoD 2nx °?"x
q- GONIMd214 N01-On 4IGN00
2! o r
Lklmuovwwf NOISN;] X9 gnN9AV ON` -1M
m m
o g ? ? 3
m
> {
d
a
q £ nSz
Q '- N - N .-.T .. tD 0 ?D
N - "t Q 0 0 - O - -

v Y ?
d _ 0
- 0
- N
- N
- In N in
- - - 1
-
O N N 01 tO m t0 - ` - - ?
r"
Irj (? O N nj m - N - N

In n e o n - ? v+ n A
U " Y V 9 4
U?
n
n
n
n
.r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W

z d
o

O

m

m

,O

q

N

•lr

N

Y

?
_ N m m o ln o o o o

? S
~ m
b
` 0
- - -

_ d 0
0 -
-
: 00 00 00
0
0
zQ
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
= n ? n n n ? n n n ?

9
0
9
9
0
9 0
- -
1

U r!I r
I
In \?' j I I ? `.
I
"?
ado \ ? .. \ / ? PS-°`?
N
lilt! .Z },I
Jil p?
l I3 1 I \\ \?
P1
1 Il????r
0 F.-
N In r InuSn o m _d_ _N ` \ ? 1` // -I 1 ? ? I \? ? II JJI
i \\\^ \ \ \ `- \\ 1 11 1 1\ N{?fI I /Z?,T? I I IfI\\L.-?.
N ?I 1 \ \? I \ 1 \ ? . "YK \ I ( II \
I ?? ; 1 1 n
N N I
` I I \ I II ` I I , I I /,
"
rI O , / / Oi ? ? I/I F? \ \ I
Q ` I
i 1
m
? 1l I:
?I ? I I I o? I /
1 1 I I I _
I ?
I II/I ? I 1
/ I I / I V I N.. l 1 r
m
?'ee JJff / i I \
\ A
\ 1

N

Y
J
U 0
o 0
k A w
R
3 U_
R
U
0
pFy? I? I? ?? ?? Ia
?? ?" I? la a a a
?a

i
I? 1
11 ,) \
V
1? 1
f 11 ?/// (V? 1`i
J m /,
7 3 p
z 8E
I
? r
I
NZ ` 11 I) KZN
l??s" ' I I I ? \\\\ 03?\\ \\
'I„
1
II / 11 I
I I \ \
?? \??\ 1 1
\\ 1 1
r? ? ?\ 11 1
-{ Q \ 1 1
-U `? 1 1
C O \ 1 1
?_
??
.1??
::,?
?\ ;
i
i ?.
_ \
b

?'
??
??
?c
??
,?

{ I
( ? ' ? 1 ? ° ? ' If ?i li ?I
I I ! ? I i E ? I i l E i ? 1 ! ? ! i
' ( ' 4 I i i ; ; ??
I I
? I i j # G 2 T f L 1 i s
; i 1 1 ,
_ 1 Il i

?
I i f 1 i j I
j t ? 1 i ! i i 2 ? ? I
? j 1 I t i I 3 ? {

1
i
1
I E
?
?? 1 f

k E
I
I

;

i

t
1

1 ?

I ?

' ? ? ? ?

! t
? I € E 1 1 1 ? I I f i
j
T !
1 ? f f l !S ? ! ( ? i ? j i j
- T pri
t
!
f !
i
i
i
i
S$
E
j
f
r ? i I ` s ? S 3 1 !
V

?
'
:I
? 1
? s
1
s
i
1

+
,
I I
!
i
li
?'?I

1

!
?
?
(

i 1
i!
?
1
E
1
; i
1

1 !

T
?
1 1
;
j
?
! I ? ? + ? ? 1 `
,, 1 ? 1 pp 1 , l
?,
1 1 ,
I
E
i
I 4
1 I _ , 1
!
r E 3?
i s
i
t
) E i
L
i j ? !, 1
?I 1
? 1
? I , I 1 I
?, 1 1? ; 6p p
?, lT T j ? i y 1 I
I ? ?
I js l f JE 11 1 { ?? €= I i E j 1 i ?? l i ' ! " !

? 1 1
1 i l i d , i ( 1 ! s
# I 1 s i ! t I 1 1 ? € i i ? E
I ? ?
I I !j
E- ? E ?
l z ( 1
t 1 1
4 1 l i
j I I .2 + Ri o !
1 i l
1 I
I
E
E 1 1 1 ( i i1 3

' '
? ? i
I
' ? i
?
?
1 i E
! !
E ! ( f ? 3

I F I`
I E I
? I
E I1
? 1 ? '
t I
F C E
3
t
1 # I
t € !
1
jj i? 1 ?
s i
i `
E ? !

I
?
f
?
t 1
i 1 ?

s(
'?
E ii
i ( t
r !
!
1 1 9 1
i1 ! EEE li
Ef
! I
(
? E
? ?
(
? j
!
1 s
? 1
1 Sf
!
1
?
' ? '; ; ? ? ? j 1 1? ? { ? ? t il t ? ? 1 1 ? i ? ? ? E 1 i `

?? ? jI ? 1
? v 1 ? l ei 1 ? ,
E k f I E N ?
, 1 ? I E 1 ! 1 ! f E ?11 E f!! I 1 1 ? ? fl l ?` xI "t I 1 1 ? > 1 3 F 11 ! ( 1 1
:24Lz
X g
u" 0
_ CA Z .? <
70
7"6 -7on
---- \
N881 O 05 55" W
z l
%
? ! I ?-
?' C? Z
70 rn
1 rn ? I rn

O

~ ~ c / , 1 I NOTES: ~
,r' I ~ , / - , ~ ! I I ~ t ~
7 ~ ~ 1 I . ALL MATERIALS AND. METHQDS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN AGGORDANCE WITH TOWN OF APEX AND PdCDQT STANDARDS AND. ~
i I I j ~ SPECIFICATIONS. (L,
/ ~ _ _ _ _ : 'Nt~W OR FORMERLY 2, BQUNDARY AND TbPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TAKEN FROM CONSTRUCTION DRAWING5 OF PAf~:SlDE ON THE GREEK- PHASE I ~ THE MANORS AND COTTAGES AT BELIA CA5A PUD (PHASE 2~ BYJONES ~ CN055EN ENGINEERiNG,'PLLC.
rr ~ ~ I I 1 - ~ I ~ JVI CONSTRUCTfON, I C, , I I I ~ I ~ 1 3. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE GAPE PEAR DRAINAGE BASIN. THE BUFFERS SHOWN ALONG EXISTING DRAINAGE FEATURES ARE TQWN C
j I P. 072 I -75- 2 / i ( NOW OR FO ELY ~ ~ ~ t I ~ 7 NED PUt7 < ~ I C7F APEX REQUIRED BUFFERS. NO OTHER DRAINAGEWAY BUFFERS ARE REQUIRED.
i I LtiP DEVE6 MENT LLC ~ ~ ( I Q 5Ec 51NG ' AMILY , >ti ~ ~ ~ PIN f 75 6500 ~ I V , ` 4. THI5 SECTION OF MILANO AVENUE DOES NOr TRAVERSE A FEMA MAPPED FLOaDPLAIN AS SHOWN ON FEMA MAF #3720072 100
~ ~ DATED MAY 2, 2006. ~
I I ~ . 4~ r 1 USE. SINGLE F Y I 5. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE TOWN OF APEX PRIMARY WATERSHED PRQTECTION OVERLAY DfSTRIGT. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY ~ m
~ I I ~ ~ ! ~ DISGREPANGIES OIL CONfLICtS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CANSTRUCTION. Lll ~
! , MII.ANO AVENUE 7: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE NORTH CAROLINA ONE CALL (I -$00-632-949) LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRfUR TO BEGINNING ~r
I p I ; a ~ 52n ~ 15 Ri.P ~ CONSTRUCTION. ~G.r ~
/ 396 I I THE ANTICIPATED POSTED SPEED FOR THIS PORTION OF MILANO AVENUE (S 35 MPH. THEREFORE, A DESIGN SPEED OF 40 MPH HA5 1 r1 / ~ V
I ~ BEEN USED IN ALL APPUCABtE DESIGN CALCULATIONS. 0 9. THE STREAM BUFFERS SHOWN ARE I'ERTHE INVESTIGATION PROVIDED BY 5011 ~ ENVIRONMENTAL GONSULTANT5, THE BUFFER 51,ZE Z ,
_ I I I ~ ~ g i I AND LOCATION Wllt BE V~RIf=1ED BY THE TOWN OF'APEX ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES D>rPARTMENT. ~
I 10. ALL NEGE55ARY PERMITS SHALL 8E OBTAINED FRQM,DWQ, THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; AND QTHER:AUTHORI~ED AGENCIES
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY INSIDE Tt1E DELINEATED STREAM BUFFERS..
4 ~ ' I I . THE PROJECT OWNERa SHAIt BE RESPON5IB(:E FOR SECURING ANY N"CESSARY OFF-SITE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS
I I I ~ Iry~l z ~ ~ AND PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. 12. ,CULVERT DESIGN FOR CREEK CR05SING 15 PER FLOOD STUDY PERFQRMED BY JONES ~ CN05SEN ENGINNEERING; PtLC DATED
~ e t ' i SEPTEMBER 2, 2008. - py
I I I C
I I ~ ! RCP - 2 ~----'~J i I °i„ I
II I0 ~ i
STORM f7RAINAGE TA6LE
1 I TING a---' i ' INTENSITY INLJrT qR. TOTAL qR. Q I O PIP>r SLOPE u~
r'r _ 1- 0 p5 may,:' I d. s. R OR FORMERLY N INI~T ~ r AREA. ac ...AREA ac G cfs inches
~ W. ~ 5i-1AR EpWARDS WA 15° RCP, g PIN: 072 I -64-8 ~ V
I ~58~., t I
~ _ _ _ C 3 ~ ~ ~ USE. afNG AMILY 0 Gq#2 7:0 i .0 1.0 0.45 3.2 15 2.4
~ . ~ ~ MsYO ors r® me. sW ~J,/' i ~ C~#3 7.0 ! .3 2.3. 0.45 _ 7.2 15 ! . 2 221 N: SAt.~M 51'
r ' C4 7:0 I.0 3.3 0.4.7 ! 0.9 15 I SUITE2tJ0
~ ~ ~ RNI ~ NO OR FQ ~ ~ + , ~ CB~5 7.0 0:3 3.6 . 0.50. 12:6 15 4.2 PQ BOX 1062
BOP DEVEI ENT, ~ GB#6 7.0 0.5 0,5 0.67,_ 2.3 15 0.6 APIX, NC 27502 r `
I P N: 072 I =6 578 15n R o ~ CB#7 7.0 ! ,0 5.1 0.5:1 18.6 24 0.6 C 914.3971174
n. R-40W a USE: 5i LE FAMILY ~ GB#8 7:0 0.2 0.2 0.75. I : ! 15 ) ,0 Fa>G 919387.3375
, CB#9 7.0 0..2 0.4 0.75. 2. i ! 5 0.6 ? .can
~ ~ t~5 GB# I 0 7.a o.2 o.z 0.75 i , ~ I ~ 0:6
' GB#! I 7.0 0.2 0.4 0.75 2.1 15 I A'
I ~ o CULVERTI _ 328.8 0.452 887,8 9'WxThi 1.6 H i?A
~ ~
l ! . CULVERT gESiGN INFORMATION IS PER FLOOq STUDY BY JONES ~ CN055EN ~'f O,y ~
P ENCINEERfNC,1'LLC gATEq SEPTEM6ER 2, 2008.
~ ~ ~ ~ 2. CALCULATEn FLOW 15 THE ! 00 YEAR STORM EVENT. ~ t µ~~5 c- '
~ ,
~ ~ ,
~'T-:~... ~~Httelpa.itNe v /~llv
~ ,
r o o 36.79
_ ~W~_~~r~ PON» .as o
- ~ A= ~ 45 7 ~ w,w
~ ...900°
, .r--~--w--_.__ 72.93
F / ilJ
/ ~
i , NOW OR FORMERLY ~ ~ 2 iii
TOWN OF AP . r IX
PIN: 072 I -66-871 ~ t,`. ~ ,,,a J/ ,,r dam,,, ,,s ~A\ ~Wj ~ ~p~
/
I ~ ~ IXISTING LAKE ~ ~ ors Ate, ~.--^"i ~ 'i ~ .
J ~ 'r Z
0 / ~ r
1 EX; TO OF BANK / ~ ; ~
sr 1,IG
i (,1 . / , ~ .
,r ;
. - i 240 Isnir~c t~uAILRU.~.:.u c o LLii
~ ti cU,rv - ~ PINi-65-4073
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ I TING t;I~FAMILY`~~~. i 't I rJ ~
,f ~ C
/ ~ G RCP 4 ~a ~ PR~P05E I0'
v i ~ MULTI-USE PATt9 i
A: ~

~
I ~ _ BiO-RETENTION CELL I ~ , ; NOW QR FORMERLY
` / AREA = ! ,855 SF ~ ~ ORfV~ BENJAMIN C. ~ CATHY J. DEELEY r ~
~ k2 PIN: 072 I -64-3439 ~.J
; '~2' ZONED: R-4OW "'7
~r OR a~ ~ USE: 51NGLE FAMILY ~G..
e f r OU E ~ / GRAS 15 , ` '2~
p
~ ~ ._--'f 15 RCP ~ ~
~ ~ ~ . ~
~ NFp
~ . ~ ; ' °d
CREEK 1`' -
GENTS N ~ ~ 0
EX ai5r~ ~ +srl~ ,
r
rHE SIGNATl1RE5 APPIXXI:D Bi:l.01N cc~t7~r Tntir m?5 srIEET M/~5 Bfl°N I~vIt1NE.D AND APPROVED SOI.p.Y I 6~ WER
PER TFiE CERTifICATIONS 91GNti? ON Tt1~ COVER SHEET OP Tt1FSE Ct7N5TRUCTION PLANS. p~
• ~ --g .c=.~..,~.,~_.---.,.ter! ; ~ , v ; ~ SEifiEMBER 2, .2008
f CM - C~NGINEERING DATC PUBl1C WORKS • >:NV. PROGRAMS DATt:
f _ ~ ~ti 11 f 0 I st TRC COMMENTS
OR FORE.... ~ CM -TRANSPORTATION DATE PLANNING DATI` 7/ 16~ t 0 2nd TRC COMMENTS
TOWN 0 EX ._.~-~r-~`,~
PIN: 0 2! -66- 1569 w NOW R Y CM -BUILDING tNSPECTiONS DATE P4ANNING - TRANSPORTATION DATE
ON>:D:-CB~_~.{~' t' PA~f'SIDEDEVE P G P1l.C ~ 1..-'~~
I PfN; 072 ~ =5 = ~ r..---~ Pt38LIG WORKa = WATERl5EWER DATC PIKE DATE
0 30 60. F20
PUBWG +NURR5 - L9.Cumc DATE PMA5 RECREATION 4 CUETUM RM- DATE ~I
, ~ I i 1. fir, C-4 PUBLIC WORK5.5 4 E DATE F%M
GRA 1Ill. 5CALE
0((~~VV8"M