820039_Inspection_20200805

Division of Water Resources , S ( A,UG 'o se)
Facility Number Z - 31, 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation G-6
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: D-ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: C>16utine 0 Complaint . 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: •gf, b c Arrival Time: ..1,M p Departure Time: .31 Sfl p County: *to CD/ Region:FJj"7
Farm Name: L�l 110 euti l—7 Owner Email: [
Owner Name: C 'it ILA& (tiL' ' efrt Phone:
Mailing Address: -
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: -C j75 4,v-W ck Title: Phone: -
Onsite Representative: (,1, Integrator: p
Certified Operator: j,b( O t-c A -n Certification Number: ( Z Z7
Back-up Operator: _ Certification Number: 2
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to.Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish lob LAO .(,%'i912 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars . . Pullets - Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts .
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ©-No❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No �'� 0 NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the.estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Ei<rA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes lago ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 8 2. 3 1. Date of Inspection: c5 O L-za zr.)
Waste Collection&Treatment �—
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? El Yes [��o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No 111_,Pdk ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: (J
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): g j
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental hreat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1224 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ElApplication Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C l" 5(0
13. Soil Type(s): /tI lJ 4--
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 4o El NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ITrNo ❑ NA El NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable El Yes To El NA ❑ NE
,acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Ilo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes r6►,‘ ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? El Yes 111No El NA El NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWATP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes II 1 ❑ NA El NE
❑Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA El NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? , ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: / Date of Inspection: ('I D g z zo
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Igo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes alrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 04 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ZI e— ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [(]'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [2,1•1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
•
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
6A1( .140 i'i4.1—101 ):5 Au 2-0 tl 5' kcal, sc,,,,,, t....2,60-zoc ?,
6
44'
nv-,R- 3c N.
�, 'GOO - 1 b
C f - (9 (8 sI
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ,5 i 1 C "v"ki p Phone: /V"�3 3 J 33 t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �J up 4� " Date: 66• r 0
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015