820028_Inspection_20200813

el
�+ .es , 3 ( s t c
+^F 1-� � . ; tt ��xma " , 1 _ ..4:4
� � ; . ' t � >� `
` t ' ` C` �� 0ii,� 5.q , ^ Fr`" -
,V . eri ,,g"7k . t^' t .t . '+ � .- -��_ , -. <S . ,
pe of Visit: 6 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
ason for Visit: ®Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access r.
A-
te of Visit: (3 41?6�AP Arrival Time: E 1304— Departure Time:Li mat County: 9 # Region: �" y
rm Name: 14 0- L 5 ( ei.1 V( Owner Email:
vner Name: 0 tp It if 5 ro9u►A 1—..L . Phone: N
' a
ailing Address:
i
ysical Address: 7
c i
catty Contact: Ill Kt �uV ((( . Title: Phone: t
(..(
isite Representative: Integrator: 44/ 2 6 �J— s viic L I
:rtified Operator: jcJ,t`rt, ` a f tL 1. Certification Number: ''z-`C 6 q
Ick-up Operator: Certification Number:
1
)cation of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
i
4
i
+
�rt � N • r
�� alp $ D, ` E " ' + I 4 , . s �7� s. its , a i
fit .
4 Wean to Finish - i 4j cc t S Layer. Dairy Cow 1
r.
Wean to ii. Feeder Non-Layer a Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish r ' s -�i, DairyHeifer'
4 Farrow to Wean ` - , ' + +
D Cow `t
�" �* .h I= ; 0 ` Non-Dairy .
Farrow to Feeder 5� , R rY
I Farrow to Finish = - La ers ri Beef Stocker
Gilts =Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets at Beef Brood Cow
4`1 - ~, -' e-0 ~ti Turkeys • - - = v� ;
"In
-§ II T s ev�,, ,_�, „ Turkey Points 1 `.
41.1 Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure ❑ Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1:::§41A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No EA ❑ NE
Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?, ❑ Yes ©No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 6 Z- z,5 Date of Inspection: t,5 40 e,Z(7,;,9)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [e_Aly— ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No laNdY❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3 J3 6' 2 Cj Z� q
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes eisTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures Iack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Erg-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [ j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes f o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ElEvidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved'Area
J
12.Crop Type(s): C 1-1 4-P sty- v
13.Soil Type(s): 4
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 111 ❑ NA ❑ NE.
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes M ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes (o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [ 5^ ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [J_N 3 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes O'IVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [].ado ❑NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: S - 2 8" Date of Inspection: /3 44.2[, ZG!2
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®� ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit,conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [J. 5 El NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
El Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: -
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 121-1415- ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Q_' o'❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 1J4Qo ❑ NA El NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes =1 11c El NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes al o. ❑ NA El NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31:Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. . El Yes ❑' El NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes [.-N ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ai o ❑ NA El NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? El Yes [No ❑ NA .❑ NE
,` airi�'an:_-YE3�ansv�ers�aucUoran:='aiIilifiQiial�reeoniaenilaitorifs�oir'an Comtentsr efer-to:. uestt0n:.# '�(il���I x.-
V*EkraRrPlefif facility to better splatn,s W44,01_1411 a 1dilitional_pages as necessaryY' `- I ,_ : .. >._: ,`., li s:. ,.
RA( 3 5 v,,,,Ak
call cuo ,-'sou— 68 s _
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1� U Du 1,1.1 1 p Phone:11 1(3 3-333`(
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ) oP Date: ! 06 Za 2-0'
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015