820023_Inspection_20200924

f —%d -I --
Ciivision of Water Resources ;.
Facility Number' r� - 23 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency - -
Type of Visit: Gmpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: a Koutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Ng-M. Arrival Time: y :3D Departure Time: /Q/'/' County: Region: r 0
Farm Name: /yl i ! I k ri ,,„t5 L L G Owner Email:
Owner Name: EU c a_k Fcte'VYL 5 L .(. L Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: �y�
Facility Contact: /// Le.- Title: 0to"Y Y' Phone:
Onsite Representative: j�,.�c,.- Integrator: ,.jpI97`I.f -0
Certified Operator: <_iy1.. Certification Number: / ( i5.-'
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
'Design Current Design. Current° _ : Design Current
Swine 'capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.s n Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
f,./Peeder to Finish (,I/S) 437 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poultr Ca I aci POI,
- " Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish 1 -- Beef Stocker
Gilts IN Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys -- .
Other Turke Points
Other II Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes a< ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes a< ❑ NA n NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 9-'�"1-,
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA El NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): / ? / 9
Observed Freeboard(in): /IS
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes I2Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [ryes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [No El NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2K ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN El PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑l Application
Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): ,I.�'i/lvte[p(c�j�"z`-���` '-�Si1? �-r. -?•'�/ ��7�f-r l L�r /SBP�yf
13. Soil Type(s): j/Un / J1,1,� f 6-(9v`-
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El-Yes rjo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [to ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ["No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? El Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12 1\To ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 1lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - 3 Date of Inspection: q_q Z
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [i]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Effio ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes I Ej< ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 31`To ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question'#)°Explain any YES answers and/or any additional reconunendations or any other comments:
Use drawings of facility tosbetter explain situations(use additional pages as necessary)
-CD(5 - lam / trams G-7D9
Reviewer/Inspector Name: s%Gy ��ur��cv Phone: ,)Z----3.b3-0 -5-1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: %' � Date: 9
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015