820015_Inspection_20200707

: C l 1440 of Water 1,11 -7:1Z 5
8 I� CODi on o So and�Wa eConse aon � 'FacalityNumter2 4 ',t 0 Other'Agenc ° ri _i- =C.� _ e.; _ e '' o �
Type of Visit:. ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
A/0 �s0fv Re Q'
Date of Visit: � � Arrival Time: f �( Departure Time:I �U f j� County: S l 1 gion I -Y
Farm Name: 1.0 ti q4- (0 Owner Email:
Owner Name: drolly(dx, d+t1�,5 ►rC V oz- Phone:
Mailing Address: •
Physical Address: '
Facility Contact: - A.Z 1-01,`- Title: . Phone:
Onsite Representative: 4 t( (-.i"(,` Integrator: �,.S
Certified Operator: A- "L 14 e`-‘ Certification Number: 4 e 6 Z�
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
ine s u Cut" `` 4 Dig Current Design Current . P Design, enur Catle Caacity 'opS Capaey Pop Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.,, . l ; p I Wean to Finish Layer = Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 1 000 --n�-- Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish ` Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current ,` Dry Cow
i '1_ Farrow to Feeder -D. Poult , Ca`r`aei Po. Non-Dairy
a Farrow to Finish e`-_M . 3--, Beef Stocker
Gilts _ Non-La ers �� Beef Feeder
Boars s•Pullets Beef Brood Cow
y
..z Turke Poults _
Oilier -,� ,
Other Other _
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Dil NA 0 NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes El No NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes El7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters 0 Yes L_I 1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 6 a). - ,5 i Date of Inspection: � 2'
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ® ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No EL NA-0 NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
0 2
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 41.9
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes r o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ��Vo ❑ NA El
maintenance or improvement?
•
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Windowi ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C (- J (7 1)
13. Soil Type(s): ' a.� get,"u y
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ YesIo El NA El NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [i To ❑ NA El NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes DiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check El Yes No ❑ NA El NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ Io El NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers El Weather Code
El Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Er9Te ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Di No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - ) Date of Inspection: 7_i wC� 7A 2.2
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ©'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey El Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ELK
❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? El Yes 12K ❑ NA El NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes la o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? /
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [�'NO El NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes [:To ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA El NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? El Yes DI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
GuA�b `�r�� ��- � St s c'1 :3r ri0l l`® 3-,3
/0 0 p,„, \9 V.-,e`61 41-1214'‘ '004,
e,4, alo g0(g to ( �{7
Reviewer/Inspector Name: (,k�I �J�, n Phone: (6�,10 f3 3 33'1
F'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: \yl/ 0 (,l,U1Y Date: �) �,02-0
Page of 3 JJJJ 2/42015
g