820009_Inspection_20200827

OA i1 tJ e'ui
q t Division of Water Resources
J Facility Number �,4 -' 'CQ I 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Ali Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: &Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ,Z 7_t7� ''0 Arrival Time: a Oe A' Departure Time: jO / County:g4i � Region: �! Y
Farm Name: ¶ �� 4V W1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: �J t 'e4 C•Ati—k t-VC, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: ;;�� /'
Facility Contact: VGA-`f i IJ Ccok-t.(C Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: �f Integrator: f
Certified Operator: f e.,14t(O (tll`s Certification Number: a7 4 if ido
Back-up Operator: - Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude:. Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean ` i0 Q - Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder, Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers • Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
•
Discharges and Stream Impacts.
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? . ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ITIAA ❑ NE
b: Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No l=r;ITA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached'waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) • ❑ Yes ❑ No [ TA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 134 ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No n NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 2- Date of Inspection:, ?,4U 6- otF)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? •❑ Yes ❑ No r-i�lA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): `2 5
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes u1<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? - ❑ Yes 141A<IO 0 NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes M o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NA El NE
El Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ElApplication Outside of Approved Area
��
12.Crop Type(s): � I 0 r(
I'If
13. Soil Type(s): . ^ //Uy lrt (i3
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designatafl in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes L11VU ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [ o El NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes n< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&-Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [ 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes BIN. ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I11 lac ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Ny ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No . ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: ? 4/4 'Z'20
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Rio ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
El Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [ I‹lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document El Yes 0,No El NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ -No El NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ El NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑A1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes la>da ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ©' ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes -To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
CAA 6- f$, s 0---3,a Poi (3e-L
�,, � � e� /o i`1 (�.3 muck pcou€11 1°0/?
a�
6 4CO P ��
ff"1-v ,asp e ali o/s poc 60/C43
c-eAt 0110- 303_ (0 (
Reviewer/Inspector Name: % 6 l IO c Phone:.t(L) --tz-1%3 3�-� 7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: W.
/\ 'CIA/q Date: 1 7 /1()(s 2^0Z0
Page 3 of 3 `/ 2/4/2 :l5