010036_Inspection_20201110

Type of Visit: PCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: p Arrival Time: L_l1V_=lam Departure Time: U County: ,Region:��
Farm Name: roAl 21 yay) �)n 1 V
Owner Name: Vy 1 To V1 nS b YN
Owner Email:
Phone: Zju��
Mailing Address: q 55� p 1 Q asp Ind M 11 Il-d ► L'� U y+-"/ t� G 2'l'qb
Physical Address: "I zi q V Q A 1�, r x 1 " C
Facility Contact: jL �� T�j �j (jam Title: Phone:
T T
Onsite Representative: \I / Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: RVICL V) aARord Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Cj �j�j (j Longitude: -7q 0 /"I'l k A l t
Ic�p E AIarnaaCt- Cy► - pdo. C15D-eh.kiitI I2d. -UrnS iyi+'o c5Y1 Van SCk.
©- &IIVGn (zd .
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes xv No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 0 jDate of Inspection: X�(JQ!x
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I V Strucrturer2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �S ( 0 �V V \V S p
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �J�Z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 1 '! No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
X No
0 NA
0 NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
ate! Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
IN Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop 0 Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
iWiinndow �,
12. Crop TYPe(s): CV, 9 Q094 `JX U\ � \� Y 1
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? , ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
t1mWaste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis ,emu "��*P Try^�f �c Weather Code
Rainfall jQ Stocking Crop Yield IK120 Minute Inspections W Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 0 No Ml NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: kk
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Pj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No I" NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. yy
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a..POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ( No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes (] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
`
Vp
,V
�W kq 601 Is . out a A Y\
( 0 t b rc.+� -cnn5 a,j-c 'd-o 2-1 .
11 LCA4-c Corn aci t v-( d VNJAS4—e 00As j� o aPpl c6.tj mV, v\f►ndcw.
'rq C k Spt G A l c bA— V� S VM of d1 an G�d`(�.2N` C� V'V��1/V'►- .
\nCo�
V-a s os-r-v Vr� � U -7 ? y 15 /� 5 -�Q �h �► - qr d ,fro Kk
y p a' � � V � �; t\ Sim n �'"
Y Y�Y� c. w«� C0,4
. C)A CAL h 4-c�v) be h l lid p� ba Yn �� V� C1
e, 0K 8A
),.A- road .
Seth cam'e�9 ss ar A-e f 9\)Ycks M
L6b o�fon r�� C�v�i �� �.� ��1ff
r ts.
I1�f lq l fal7b q��u� Vw�P - CW�_ C) � -k- W6 W 6Tn 6 vfi S
L -b • 611 � � W� c �� �rn� -V OYtO r
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Y Ca �� 1 Q U� ( Phonej—�
Reviewer/Inspector Sign Date:
Page 3 of 3 /4/20 15