090211_Inspection_20200723

t t, r-:,H-'., p''Yi--';-'' m' liVision of Wa`tee tesources_ I" V
,. - 4� "
'acilitylnmler 0 Division of SoiLand rater Conservation
,-aLR,R -. QOtherAency , m ' ^�1 7-
. , _ek d .t : . .1 ; ry -'0 . ''` ""': -','„if'.. . g _A :., -�.F'..,., ab: . , a.a`-
Type of Visit: eCompli nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0.Technical Assistance'
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0,Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:17 G7%�'v4) Arrival Time: 'i Pr() Departure Time: /f'/Jr County: Zodowt. Region: -r v
Farm Name: /7./5L�9v 44,0'/vz - 5r -1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: `r L774 Lee-t-t_p ii/19-y_IDS.- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: `LT-, /ca,i_ c, Title: "-curl r'T Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: ��,� Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number: ,- .
f;r;.. -- '
Location of Farm: • Latitude: Longitude:
6; Design Current ,_z Design Current `, 'Design lCurrent '
b
Swine C,,apacity Popes , We "Poultry Capacity -'opattle o CapacityaPop
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
t Feeder to Finish _ g
C� Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Cu4nt Dry Cow 4
Farrow to Feeder , D Pouf' s' Ca s ad ' _Po a _ Non-Dairy
a Farrow to Finish ' Beef Stocker
�' Gilts - a'.Non-La ers �� Beef Feeder
1176
Boars .Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Oth e0'� e� " '. .,mg Turke Poults �� = s
Other •Other �� 7
_..6= ,._tea ,,� ;:� .., , -,,,. .„. a ai.9 , ; � , �. .„ v �;�4 3 s, ,� ..;�.�.�°�
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA _
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑Application Field- ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? - ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
• c. -What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ,y E ,
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts Or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA rJ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? .
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: = s,// Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [l"NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Ergr
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑:Yes El No El NA LJ 1V�
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application /
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ n NA /'
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ErgE
❑ Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN El PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. El Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? El Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 'LINE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Dom`
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA EI NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NAB
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA LJ 1V�
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design El Maps El Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers El Weather Code
El Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA LJ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [('l�
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 9— - ./( Date of Inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Q.NEE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA L�J 1Vi
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA piglE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA L1i"1V1
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA p4e
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? /
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑'1VE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No .❑ NA
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) C '`
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑,V_NA agg
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Q' .❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Conunents(refer to question,##):Explain any YES an wer,`s_and/or any additional recur mendations or any other comments:
Use drawings of facility tobetter explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).:
751,01
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ���Pi-e C�G� Phone: -YC7,j�l5f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: `^✓�� �� Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015