The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About090208_Inspection_20200331 ;Ir y r ,q €_ 4w. m .rg ,jr.. ' s—, -�s ' ,,: .,a: �. _.,rn s i; a..a 'f`y t-:„„0 k 5 : 1,9L4t.: _ �i' x° -ten. -4. t.. .,a ,..� i 1 pe of Visit: 0-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance 1 ason for Visit: CD'Aoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access 1 le of Visit: 4 I hko Arrival Time: 7.tfc 4. Departure Time: 9;/O A County:_1,31y�e t Region:Fit / I (v a iv Z Owner Email: �q,to r. lkrl i % rm Name: �li I v`1 I �n i �vner Name:` '�l utr h u ` ( towtri. L LG Phone: 1 1 ailing Address: 4 iysical Address: �i %t, 449ric 1 icility Contact:, I ( Title: Phone: LC Inte rator: 4-,41.i 7 N i'�d [site Representative: g i 3. .rtified Operator: rt I f_ 4 tt1,Y'tO�' Certification Number: Q ro 1 ick-up Operator: Certification Number: i 3 )cation of Farm: "" Latitude: Longitude: i +-�`.s' r:� :_ .,�.:;» -��,.w.x: :wr-�=a;«��ri�:� �� "F..a�Er,�r�"t �'z�;e--..�:6„ ;�':�; ''_,r�'�, 3 - - ��, ..ss'e::!:f=:z;;:s -- i$�}��:[:;�;i� i�;.-.wz=,v `=.�`_. -- x=ras�'-.'7t� - - :=^'.,'�=3�k:^ a�.�.. _y�:' �� _-��==�'' _s£'°:� .:...�:.?��`:.;�K=. ....-;�i�,.:=� w�+�.k�-c��s'=' ,,r� - .�':t;.y, �.-�.._ _ +^:�'- `.�%a,.ice.b '.�`�= r»P�-r;'.zBdS`� _..a v. szr.�d' - ! ,,.,;_ '4. - .-�. >..: m'-1,; . :ur_e. ` t*,- -''z'='-.z�..��'Y`- ^". 1 ' _-`..,. .- . .n7,, ., . -; {�ti - ! �`�°-�";s�4.c'�ate, - :^ az5�zc. �`.-, +;� k:.�n�r � s h, h�� ar�z �� -ue�'� .: ..' - x* : ar��, .�"° gd: _.ale �-�� ;=.�;�,f_ >� t�� to -=?`�5:;: ��,-.. z,;`",', �.5 �'�'rv-� x i Ka-, 'S.-"`1„ t .:=.;5'x, -'e+ a , • -*, f�= ,;;^}=' `" tea'z'? a iT" �a,=��:"a- "n� s „". r .3G, r ? ',,-- x r*assK `; .; $sr I`�Z:a,.-"y 4t 4� :T-4- n .' ` '�'--'� _,1 'k�1FryY ' ? "'" �-� 7,. ^:� s" x�r:ri��'z`��.ilk;,��:'.��a� ��a`�''"�<� � ` s "�`� '§t '� �m '��p ��: �`�. �4' � ��-.7z> � = �: via, ��d � y i b L Wean to Finish .~ Layer Dairy Cow n 41 MI Wean to Feeder � ' - Non-Layer Dairy Calf ".>, II Feeder to Finish „ 0� '-'-.' A :` `-• n .-� -4 Dairy Heifer • h' e.° u,�en DryCow Farrow to Wean 4 u . µL -a g t T +. Non-Dairy Ill Farrow to Feeder g °uc, - °' g4 g.um Farrow to Finish 4 • - Beef Stocker Gilts -- �Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder itt Boars Pullets --b Beef Brood Cow-;-z"sa.!" a ! iz r'.K.,z,^�,z..'.'' "`y o. .. z..TM.,. z -'* r ems.,,,,p`Z}?.,,a: -a �ry, � '�.- ice:'�. _ ",. �?� �...,.. ,e _ ,}.,,. �'.a,:='t-�s'u..e*-� _.>a:,mr� e „ .:_'i:�� i�r ,*,�*.�z-,?_ L2� r. - ,3fi.. 'e.�"? 'K'_. '*"' ., i ''` ,_,,,,, -a-,,,,-;., x.� ` r 3 ^�� ■Turke Poults , - .,.�` _ty Fig I "`� ', 15,- sue* it, Other•) Otheratv ,-w - . i +44 ,° .. .a Li..i'�'-a,^.a,'.d� -csw r,,,:-RZS». ,,,t ...,..,__,,,,o'al-n,z 4 s.:�x,_.._.y-,.7v<,,v-ii,"$•7,'-,..3:=-?=`.�;.�"' .,,,t..".-.m a...R==':,.e....w .e.e �._ _., nt::4,;v�4 - -''&„,44_aev g451!`" )ischarges and Stream Impacts .Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes DICIso ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: . a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No [ A ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 0'CA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ErN—A [1 NE ? Is-there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts,or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Erg- o ❑ NA r ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: q - Date of Inspection: .S/ fll6 4 2-O Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes El-MT ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [L]1 ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): 3 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures,observed? ❑ Yes [-No ❑NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 111-Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [(�No ❑ NA ❑ NE • 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Dfo 0 NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Q'go ❑ NA n NE maintenance or improvement? ( Waste Application � 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes LJ 1Vto ❑ NA 0 NE maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below.- 0 Yes _ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN. ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): C,c p 13.Soil Type(s): o+r�3 lA 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated,in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes []moo ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes fo' ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes' [No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [(]No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 191 Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes_ E7 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes a-No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers . ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking 0 Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections - ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? . ❑ Yes lf No ❑NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? '❑ Yes El' o ❑ NA ❑-NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: Cj - 2c� Date of Inspection: 3 i 'Z 14.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes 0 to ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [lNO ❑ NA ❑.NE ' the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ,❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any.lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [ 1 To ❑ NA . ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Le] (1 ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead,animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [t"Io ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? - 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? - ❑-Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office-of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 246 ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�'�No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance-of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes DN.() ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [=No ❑ NA ❑ NE _ :'mdatioii's=o'.='aiiit..,:O41*-iriiments - `to - a pan�°°YES answers=and/or:an ;:-;a�c�tran�l;r`eeomune .�.. ,_�! _ .�. eats refer to uestion:# an - m y` Oom •- - - � - - :jam "r�e n`ce s ""as'tioua e e aadi lath - . �Ise..alravgmgs,....,-. _, .tY:..... .....:..._,� - _.. _. - , . . ._ , . -� 'al kf °LA. ki)-?- — 643—( 6c p- 74 Reviewer/Inspector Name: [pit/6 G II Phone: atto-'(3 3' 34 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: S k A t, 1 Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015