wq0006906_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (2)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
N.C. DEPT. OF
October 7, 1996 RNVIRortDA.,NT, H .SUM,
fn NATURAL RESOURCtS
Mr. David M. Robinette, Public Works Director
Town of Taylorsville OCT 0 1996
204 Main Avenue Drive, SE
Taylorsville, North Carolina 28681 OlVISl011 OF tilHA&E3IE11T
Subject: Permit No. WQ0006906M'ONESULE 1010IIAL OFFICE
Town of Taylorsville
Land Application of Wastewater Residuals
Alexander County
Dear Mr. Robinette:
In accordance with your application received on August 26, 1996, we are forwarding herewith
Permit No. WQ0006906 dated October 7, 1996, to the Town of Taylorsville for the operation of a
wastewater residuals land application program. This permit is to add two new land application sites, the
Robert Lynn Marshall Site and the Donald G. Payne Site. Please note, the Herman Dairy Farm, Inc. Sites
AL 2-1 through AL 2-4 have been withdrawn from this permit in compliance with the wishes of the
property owner.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 31, 1997, shall void Permit
No. WQ0006906 issued November 13, 1992, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as
specified therein. Please pay particular attention to the monitoring and reporting requirements contained in
this permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required operational
information will result in future compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the
right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of
this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of North
Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447,
Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Mr. John Seymour at
[phone] extension 546.
Sincerely,
r
r4re
ston ward, Jr., P.E.
cc: Alexander County Health Department
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
•Mooresville Regional- Office -Groundwater Section
Bob Cheek, Groundwater Section, Central Office
Training and Certification Unit
Facilities Assessment Unit
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

6. All residuals included in this permit must be monitored annually from the date of permit
issuance, for compliance with condition I.11 of this permit. Data to verify stabilization and
vector attraction reduction of the residuals must be maintained by the Permittee. The
required data is specific to the stabilization process utilized, but should be sufficient to
clearly demonstrate compliance the Class A pathogen requirements in 40 CFR Part
503.32(a) or with the Class B pathogen requirements and site restrictions in 40 CFR Part
503.32(b), and one of vector attraction reduction requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.33. In
addition, the EPA certification statements concerning compliance with pathogen
requirements, vector attraction reduction requirements and management practices must be
completed annually by the proper authority or authorities if more than one is involved,
either the person who prepares the residuals, the person who derives the material, or the
person who applies the residuals.
7. Three copies of all required monitoring and reporting requirements as specified in
conditions III 1, III 2, III 3, III 4, III 5 and III 6 shall be submitted annually on or before
March 1 of the following year to the following address:
NC Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Facility Assessment Unit
PO Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
8. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office, telephone
number 704/ 663-1699 as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the
next working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of
the following:
a. Any occurrence with the land application program which results in the land application
of significant amounts of wastes which are abnormal in quantity or characteristic.
b . Any failure of the land application program resulting in a release of material to receiving
waters.
Any time that self -monitoring information indicates that the facility has gone out of
compliance with the conditions and limitations of this permit or the parameters'on
which the system was designed.
d: Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render the facility
incapable of adequate residual treatment.
e. Any spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting residuals to the
application site.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter
form within five (5) days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report must
outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur.
I V . GROUNDWATER REQUIREMENTS
For areas that are prone to flooding or within the 100-year flood elevation, residuals may
be applied only during periods of dry weather (April through November). The residuals
must be incorporated into the soil within twenty-four (24) hours of application.
7

2. The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in
15A NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The Compliance Boundary is
for the disposal system constructed after December 31, 1983 is established at either (1) 250
feet from the waste disposal area, or (2) 50 feet within the property boundary, whichever is
closest to the waste disposal area. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or
beyond the Compliance Boundary is subject to immediate remediation action in addition to
the penalty provisions applicable under General Statute 143-215.6A(a)(1).
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2L, a REVIEW BOUNDARY is established around the
disposal systems midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the
waste disposal area. Any exceedance of standards at the Review Boundary shall require
remediation action on the part of the permittee.
3. Any groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall be
provided.
4. No land application of waste activities shall be undertaken when the seasonal high water
table is less than three feet below land surface.
V . INSPECTIONS
1. The Permittee or his designee shall inspect the residuals storage, transport, and application
facilities to prevent malfunctions and deterioration, operator errors and discharges which
may cause or lead to the release of wastes to the environment, a threat to human health, or a
nuisance. The Permittee shall maintain an inspection log or summary including at least the
date and time of inspection, observations made, and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective
actions taken by the Permittee. This log of inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee
for a period of five years from the date of the inspection and shall be made available to the
Division of Water Quality or other permitting authority, upon request.
2. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Water Quality
may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or place on
or related to the application site or facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept
under the terms and conditions of this permit; and may obtain samples of groundwater,
surface water, or leachate.
VI. GENERAL CONDITIONS
This permit shall become voidable unless the land application activities are carried out in
accordance with the conditions of this permit, the supporting materials, and in the manner
approved by this Division.
2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes described in
the application and other supporting data.
3. This permit is not automatically transferable. In the event that there is a desire for the
facilities to change ownership or a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request
must be submitted to the Division of Water Quality accompanied by an application fee,
documentation from the parties involved, and other supporting materials as may be
appropriate. The approval of this request will be considered on its merits and may or may
not be approved.
�3

4. The following are approved sites for residuals application (see attached map(s)):
Application Area [acres]
Site No. Owner/Lessee (excluding buffers)
AL 3-1
Bill Pope
11.0
AL 4-1
Robert L. Marshall
23.1
AL 4-2
Robert L. Marshall
15.5
AL 4-3
Robert L. and William H. Marshall
11.4
AL 5-1
Donald G. Payne
10.3
AL 5-2
Donald G. Payne
11.8
AL 5-3
Donald G. Payne
12.9
AL 5-4
Donald G. Payne
12.8
AL 5-5
Donald G. Payne
12.5
AL 5-6
Donald G. Payne
12.1
AL 5-7
Donald G. Payne
12.1
AL 5-8
Donald G. Payne
6.0
AL 5-9
Donald G. Payne
73.0
AL 5-10
Donald G. Payne
7.4
AL 5-11
Donald G. Payne
6.0
AL 5-12
Donald G. Payne
5.2
AL 5-13
Donald G. Payne
4.5
AL 5-14
Donald G. Payne
3.4
AL 5-15
Donald G. Payne
7.8
AL 5-16
Donald G. Payne
11.4
AL 5-17
Donald G. Payne
8.3
TOTAL AVAILABLE ACRES 278.5
5. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject the
Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality in accordance with
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6(a) to 143-215.6(c).
6. The annual administering and compliance fee must be paid by the Permittee within thirty
(30) days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly may cause
the Division to initiate action to revoke this permit as specified by 15 NCAC 2H .0205
(c)(4).
7. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any and
all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government
agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
8. The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall request its
extension. Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review the adequacy of the
facilities described therein, and if warranted, will extend the permit for such period of time
and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate.
9. This permit may be modified, or revoked and reissued to incorporate any conditions,
limitations and monitoring'requirements the Division of Water Quality deems necessary in
order to adequately protect the environment and public health.
E

10. This permit shall become voidable unless the agreements between the Permittee and the
landowners/lessees are in full force and effect. The land owner agreements are considered
expired concurrent with the expiration date of the permit and must be renewed at the same
time the permit is renewed.
Permit issued this the 7th day of October, 1996
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
A. Preston ard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number WQ0006906
10

Specializing in Land Application • Sludge Disposal
VICINITY MAP
N

ylrlheelabmtor Clean Water Systems Inc.
B&R0DivWo
SuDlhcin krgum
908 Belnccr Dntr
I`CIIInn1, Al. 3512-1
205.664.B440
205.664.767h 1:u
L CH. RD
,Or�i 0 z p ° PLEASANT
H ^ x
im J 7. R AID
n
' ► f O r
= 7y z OLD 4Sh
� RO
s
,`IlG < OFF LOUDERMEL
t9 GLPSS p t310 1 1KE ACTr ��F L� m ROCKY P'AC-
J R'L O 9 v> .p Q
R,P BnPH C)�` M T N ms
W 3 g RO
CH 1795'
G y
P C E
O a.L+771) .I°(L CeMETEPy pO ROUNDTORol} 2 , y
m � z Se o 1 A MTN \ 4, 0\ fF. N qp 146, 9
" i Y4E� o cos ?P pRF ¢ RAM1
SSLEJAI
Y C 0
GpPs LIN ADAA,S� m jp1{NNY W/
? 1416J (t41T) m a� o N U r 9�
OTE MOOSE RD` -� 7rr t ° LE0000 9 Q
fD l I1 E L o N--�'�— OX Py OURKE e `\ 1j414) FA' RD RD MgHSH
�y* �O. t13 o v \9 (14y�l RD
m9avil C ` CARSON CNAP� RD ° tm �^ OqK IN
1,31q Y ORSVILLE - '��i�-�? -S�'0 _'
MUD19 foRK .A OTHER S1 I ROCKY SPRINGS q0 \'Pf',T SY
LN
y LN O
COME A4ccL EL \ W h
faf U 5 O \H5 (149T1 i11, S �`
90 64 Q P _ G < J
= Q\. W w OBLE RD
^ `�'AfF,�'gN p F yS 5 VER
j O f 1 i _�61f9 RR _w n '
Slalt ➢ ��,^3� �nyy �.n Cep
90
SOS" t-- < _ Daa ^ Z) yt`' O
OOP O 0. `
CHA ANC ?p CAA 1i ¢ no > p` ( J �)" awn ••,.u� A
J RI Suit
ti
Ap ' 6 3 y
lDRF„ UN- ? �P` 1,`� CH W=( O tit]1 IDDENITE- A J ¢ }\Q'� MACED ONIP W
90 ..J 2 . i
p Aq T,N
TTT r0 w i --IkD OUNO,. L1605) i.y1LL YY
^p` t -A 17�(/`
°'4T U 0 V'r l O 1T� `► it
27) tIT (Q J FAIR V)ay
C
Rp L pFI Ge TTI 9 \^6 ]11
�C 0 CLN RD
02 CT OWO0O s PO J LIBERTY CN"RO O'
L%O AIPSp,,, LN N\` Cl ° HFNRy
�? D O o ry ALLENDALE \ '.,°� yO°o•
WKELPIN LN IT. J.,YEi
(1T�1 1-42) S a 90
SE H001 PAXX 0 C
ALSPr ° �, 1610 hi° 3 I.r�
RD P
^ a LE
SCALE:
1" = 2 miles Site AL4
A WHI.ELABR rok TECIINULWIEIS COMPANY
VICINITY MAP
Land Apphcaliun • 1)10•FIX AI6ulinc Slahihzanun
IPS Cumpos(ing • Uryiug : nd l`dlc(ILing
N
PKIN"ITI) (IN KLf'11'I t I11'NIT11

A& 101,eelablator Clean !,Water systems Mc
MtGRQD,,i'
I U]"U'URAPHIC MAP
Somhern Region
908 BcIchcr Drive
Pelham. Al- 35124
2(0)5.664 . 8440
205.664.7679 Fax
I
\wu i I \1,pN1,ip I,, P-Ili, ­.w.v;N
IT'S Ul-lmr—linp Urving a ... I PcIl'!uilip
PRI111:1) ON Ry:r-yct.r.ri

AL Wheelabratoi Clea» Water Systems In
908 Belcher I h I%r
Pclll;uu, Al. 351 _2 1
205.66A.b440
205.60A.7676 Fax
SCALE: 11t = 2 miles
VICINITY MAP
�.Jlld Al)hIICaI11L1 • 1310' I'I X Aliafii1C Stabilization
A WHEELABRATOR TECHNOLOGIES IOMPAN'1 IPS C'ornlw�sung • Drying and Pellclizing
Site AL5
N
PRIN I LD ON RllA II II VAPte
0

107eelabrator Clean Water Systems Inc.
Ir
Southern Region
908 Belcher Drive
Pelham. AL 35124
205.664.6440 •
201.664.7678 Fax
SCALE: 1:24,000 Site AL5, Fields 1 through 17
TOPOGRAPHIC AIAP
Land Application • R10- FIX Alkaline Stahilization N
IPSCilml—ling • Dryingand Pellelizing PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

r
r
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
s ep-r. 10, 17S�
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: �a 2 g� /1 .o G� r2-TIIAiv
Regional Of f ice
FROM:ti
SUBJECT: Application for / Permit Renewal
I.
Pegrm�t- Arnendme t I� 'e'er 5e �
New/ Permit
Facility Name: %Jw�- �� lU'�S✓�G1
County:
Type of Project: IAA�d. /{ �0�, Sl1"cle
APPLICABLE PERMIT NO . s : WQ o oo G 70 6 U,GW 7.'
UIC
h]mCI
EPA
A to C
CUA
The Groundwater Section has received a copy of the referenced permit
application, a copy of which should have been sent to your Regional
Water Quality Supervisor - IF A COPY HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED IN THE
REGIONAL OFFICE, PLEASE LET ME KNOW.
The Groundwater Section has received a copy of the referenced permit
application. A p,X gf thZap-Uccat,i documents we ece ved is
attaach�ed .
The Groundwater Section has received a subsurface disposal project
from the Div. Env. Health's On -Site Wastewater Section. A copy of
the application has been forwarded to DEH's Regional Soil
Specialist, Please coordinate your review with
that Soil Specialist.
_,-,Pleas_e-review the application materials for completeness. If you feel
add"tional information is necessary, please let me know no later than
A copy of any formal request for additional information
.will be forwarded to you.
If -you -do not need any additiona-l_=iifformatdi©n, to complete your review,
please provide your final comments by ac.7• / t%9� .f you Copt MO=
EmosNG aM3 UMnab AMTozamtUono
\TRANS.SHL

rl Wov GROUNDWATER SECTION GW # 176
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RECORD OF WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
REVIEW BY C14yele DATE 9'n `916 FIELD INVESTIGATION? (Y/N) YPS
FACILITY NAME ✓_own j '%&.y/osv ACE COUNTY
LOCATION 76 r sv://PWC
TYPE OF DISPOSAL SYSTEM (LAGOON, ETC.) S�v� �' �4 ''a" DESIGN CAP. (GPD) Wo
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY ) Mof s4v/1
/7 �kAvFd.—1
01
SIZE OF IMPOUNDMENT (FT. SQ.) &/OR SIZE OF APPLICATION AREA 2 9 -?• S `e'FS
WASTE SOURCE: MUN. SLUDGE MUN. W. WATER: PRIMARY SECONDARY TERTIARY
IND. SLUDGE IND. WELL WATER OTHERS:
DISTANCE FROM WASTE SOURCE TO NEAREST: STREAM
FOR WELL: TYPE OF USE St�� , DEPTH
WHA/T1 DESIGN CONDITIQNS WILL REDUCE/IN REASYHA
r,,.�� F s ✓�
> WO FT.,
WELL y rov FT. ����%Ja/ I& ` Ile" 6. & sQi%"fe/6
PUMP RATE (EST.) ?
OF �GW CONTAMM NATION: Ilah eel- ! f- &'l ��Prs
WHAT NATURAL SITE CONDITIONS WILL REDUCE/INCREASE CHANCE OF GW CONTAM ATION: dPffk!af
5011/5 . l&'-a c./ 4,,en 916,c&5 , /­ /z' a./ Dafr'ans cv. /l l --cos .�a�� rc '<-a ti .
DEPTH TO: BEDROCK ? y FT., SEASONAL HIGH W.T. FT., ANNUAL W.T. FLUX } FT.
SURFICIAL AQUIFER
GEN. LITHO .OGY �y Z.— � t/.y 4 41'�
HYD. COND. '� �� +z FT./DAY ❑MEASURED
[,t ESTIMATED
THICKNESS FT.
NO. OF MONITER WELLS: PROPOSED: UP 0
FROM WORKSHEET: SITE NUMERICAL DESCRIPTION=
BEDROCK/(ARTESIANAQUIFER /
Grb�,•�� � (06sC✓J�(' T"l(94( M <<(Cil
❑ MEASURED
FT./DAY ® ESTIMATED
DOWN 0 ; EXISTING: UP DOWN c2
T 1 2 3 4 5 6 6A 613
SITE GRADE (HYDROGEOL.) =
PROPOSED SAMPLING SCHEDULE & PARAMETER(S):
SITUATION GRADE=
HAVE THERE BEEN ANY EXCEEDANCES OF THE GROUNDWATER STANDARDS? YES NO
HAS ANY ENFORCEMENT ACTION BEEN TAKEN? YES NO DATE OF ACTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY OF ENFORCEMENT ACTION TAKEN:
REMARKS/ RECOMMENDATIONS (Continue on reverse, if necessary):
6e �q/ �,�' lee) Ll'le 401/40 .41-5v%te a ell •'�/�S
Az s -� /6 4,pr
GW-48 Revised 04/94
HYD. REGIONAL UPERVISOR

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
September 30, 1996
MEMORANDUM
To: Carolyn McCaskill
Through: Bob Cheek
From: Brian Wootton
Subject: Town of Taylorsville
Amendment to Permit No. WQ0006906
Land Application of Sludge
Alexander County
WQ0006906/GW96176
(John Seymour: DEM SERG Review Engineer)
N.C. Dti >T. O_F
HNVIRONp,IFNT, HEALTH,
NATUR 6,L
OCT l r�
RIM?] OFIT
The Groundwater Section has reviewed the subject permit amendment request for an
additional 267.5 acres to the sludge land application program. We have no objection to issuance of
the permit, provided that the following conditions are included:
1. No land application of waste activities shall be undertaken when the seasonal high
water table is less than three feet below land surface.
2. For areas that are prone to flooding or within the 100-year flood elevation, residuals
may be applied only during periods of dry weather (April through November). The
residuals must be incorporated into the soil within twenty-four (24) hours of
application.
3. The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations
in 15A NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The Compliance
Boundary for the disposal system constructed after December 31, 1983 is established
at either (1) 250 feet from the waste disposal area, or (2) 50 feet within the property
boundary, whichever is closest to the waste disposal area. An exceedance of
Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the Compliance Boundary is subject to
immediate remediation action in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under
—I

1• V � r
41
State of North - arolina j
Department of Environment, l r
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality b �•r
7
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director >°FALTx,
�s NATURAL RESOURCES
SEP 6 1996
August 27, 1996
MR. ROBERT W. DUNCAN olalslM. R Er+ LE REGINIAL OFFlCEE1i1ENT
MOORESV�.LE AEOIOrIAL OFFICE
TUW1V uF iAY`iGRjViLLE
204 JAI^ ..^_VR P. P'IVE SE
TAYLORSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28681
Subject: Application No. WQ0006906
A Sludge Facility
Sludge -Land Application
Alexander County
Dear MR. DUNCAN:
The Division's Permits and Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit application an6
supporting materials on August 26, 1996. This application has been assigned the number listed above.
Your project has been assigned to John Seymour for a detailed engineering review. Should there be any
questions concerning your project, the reviewer will contact you with a request for additional
information.
Be aware that the Division's regional office, copied below, must provide recommendations from the
Regional Supervisor or a Procedure Four Evaluation for this project, prior to final action by the
Division.
If you have any questions, please contact John Seymour at [phone] extension 546. If the
engineer is unavailable, you may leave a message on their voice mail and they will respond promptly.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAIKING
INQUIRIES ON THIS PROJECT.
cc 1Moo>esvi`IleZZegzoriaf-Office
Bio Gro
Sincerely,
YarolMyn7MMcCaskill
Supervisor, State Engineering Review Group
Pollution Prevention Pans
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
.......... ....................... .
. .............. ....
N.C. DF-FT- 13F
F,j,,TV1RONM5-T-1T, REAL"",
& NATURAL r'H'SOLJRGEB
SEP 6 1996
gIVIS12,11 OF ClivipGIRMITAL MAMMIMIT
- - mmlm-Ll �1410A- ff—HE
Town of Taylorsville
Land Application Sites
August 20, 1996
m;mxm
........ .... . ....... ... ..
.... ................. ... . . ... .... ....
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Wheelsbrator Water Technologies Inc.
Rio Oro Division
A WMX Technologies Company Tel. [phone]
Southern Region Fax [phone]
908 Belcher Drive
Pelham, AL 35124
August 21, 1996
Mr. Donald Safrit
Division of Water Quality
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Land Application Sites
Town of Tayiorsville
Dear Mr. Safrit:
Please find attached for your consideration site specific information on the following land
application sites located in Alexander County.
Robert Lynn Marshall Site AL4, Fields 1 through 3
Donald G. Payne Site AL5, Fields 1 through 17
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 704.732.8500 or
John Scaduto at 205.664.8440.
Sincerely,
Robert Hamilton
Technical Specialist

O
To: Permits and Engineering Unit PRIORITY: YES
Water Quality Section (see Part IV)
Atten: John Seynmour
Date: September 13; 1996
NON -DISCHARGE STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County: Alexander
Permit No.: WQ0006906
MRO No.: 96-171
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: Town of Taylorsville
Sludge Land Application
.204 Main Avenue Drive, SE
Taylorsville, North Carolina 28681
2. Date of Investigation: September 12, 1996
3. Report Prepared By: Michael L. Parker, Environ. Engineer rI
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone number: Robert Hamilton,
Bio-Gro, [phone].
5. Directions to Site: See permit application for locations of
the various sludge land application sites.
6. Disposal Site(s), List for all disposal sites: See permit
application for coordinates of sludge land application
disposal sites.
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicate sludge disposal_
site(s) on map. (See permit modification request)
7. Size: The Town has submitted ti 268 acres for inclusion into
their land appliaction program.
8. Topography: Neither of the two sites are located within the
100 year flood plain. Portions of both sites which have
slopes >10% will be buffered for surface application.
9. Location of Nearest Dwelling and Water Supply Well: There
are both wells and residences located adjacent to both land
application sites, however, all appear to be properly
buffered in the application package.
10. Watershed Stream Basin Information: See permit application
for Watershed information
a. Watershed Classification: Fields AL4 1,2,3: C
Fields AL5 1-17: WS-II
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Catawba; 030832
C. Distance to surface water from disposal System: Varies
depending on the site (see Permit application).

Page Two
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. Type of sludge: 80% Domestic*
20% Industrial_*
t
Estimate
The Town has one significant industry and is in the process
of developing a pretreatment program.
a. Volume: 85 Dry tons per year (estimated)
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater: The
primary industrial contributor is a textile stone
washing operation.
C. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater: none that
we are aware.
d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): The Town of
Taylorsville does not have a Pretreatment Program.
2. Current Permitted Capacity: N/A
3. Type of Treatment: Existing sludge treatment consists of
aerobic digestion. The sludge drying beds are no longer
used.
4. Sludge Handling and Disposal Scheme: In the past, sludge
was taken to the municipal landfill. The Town plans to rely
on land application for all future disposal needs.
5. Treatment Plant Classification: Class III
7. SIC Code(s): 4952
Wastewater Code(s): 01
Main Treatment Unit Code: 40003
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds (municipals only)? N/A
2. Special monitoring requests: N/A
3. Air Quality and/or Groundwater concerns or hazardous
materials utilized at this facility that may impact water
quality, air quality, or groundwater? Groundwater comments
should be obtained. There are no known Air Quality or
hazardous materials concerns.

i 6
Page Three
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The applicant, Town of Taylorsville, has applied for a
modification of its non -discharge permit for the addition of ti
268 acres to its sludge land application program.
Comments on the proposed land application sites are as follows:
Fields AL4-1,2,3
Slope (topography) will restrict a portion of the available
area. These areas have been buffered by the applicant.
Excellent soil depth and cover crop Were found during the
site investigation. These fields are well buffered on the
north, west, and south sides.
Fields AL5 1-17
Fields 1-15 are actually strip crop rows, which are
contiguous with each other. The fields were segregated by
the land application contractor for operational purposes.
All of the fields (1-17) have established cover crops and
deep, well drained soils. Appropriate buffering will be
necessary for those areas adjacent to water courses,
dwellings, and property lines.
It is recommended that the permit be modified to include the
fields described above. It should also be noted that the Town is
currently experiencing a serious solids storage/disposal problem,
due to the Town's largest land application site's owner abruptly
dropping out of the program. Therefore, it is important that
prompt review be given this request to avoid WWTP noncompliance
due to an inability to remove solids from the treatment system.
Signature o
f __1 - I1z__
Water Quality
h:\nsdr�ndsrW taylors,slq
epor{t Preparer Date
ional Supervisor Date

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Table of Contents
Section 1.0 Permit Application Form
Section 2.0 Attachments
Section 3.0 Site Specific Information
:.................................. ............. ...........................................
.......................................................:.......:::::::::...:::::::::..
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Section 1.0 Permit Application Form
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Sio Gro Division

State of North Carolina
Dept, men of ':Environment'- Health', �and �-,Natural � Resource&,.
-Division_ of F,,nviron.Managp
mental.-ipe,n,t',,
Non-Discharge,.,Permit ,,Application Form.
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL):
LAND -APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS,
-
Ms application is intended forixesiduals which Willb6 regulated tinder 40 Cf�k Part ;5'03
I.: GENERAL INFORMATION:'
1.ADDIiCarlt'Sname. (please,spec the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, etc.):
Town of Taylors.ville, North.:--, Carol'fna'',W'astcL%W'ater-T'rea.tmObt - Plant`
2. Print Owners or Signing Official's name and title (the person who is legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
David M., Robinette,_Public,Works Director-
-,3-.-"Mailitfg-ad(ifle'-s's-,,--20,4--�Ma-in--.,Ave.nu.e Drive-,
NC
City-:--Tay1-o-rsv--fl--1 e zip: 28681-'-ii'
Telep 704 632.22.18 Fax [phone]
hqne Number:(
Application Date—.-__..Aqg_qat...20, 1996
5. Fee Submitted: S-40&;-0 0 ---'---[The permit processing- fee- should -be -as -specified in 1-5A-NCAC2H-;0205(c)(5)J
6. Specify, whether, these residuals will be lapd, applied to: agricultural lands, forest, public contact sites,
reciamitibri'sit6s-,"-(Please-be"I be-disti'ibiiied*-'f(jt.-w� "i3 �la-,--.or,'h'o'm';e--g�a'rdeb use, the
application for the . "DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS" should be completed rather than this p
,2p lication.)
?
V,
7. If the alternative for residual disposal consists of "surface disposal" as defined under .,jq,CFR Part.503,T1696,complete the
application titled "SURFACE DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS. Please identify if ibere is any storage of residuals in
a surface impoundment or disposal tbrujandfilling,,PcpL : .... .
8. For Cla-ss13`Residuals (or Class AiResiddals to � be:land-aVp liedcon,adedicated.site);"ple,e.spetify,,Oc,numbe pf.acreson-,-
which residual solids are to be land applied under the authority of this permit:
4-
267,.r-5-_ 'D'f0p0sed):'38'5' 0 acres
I.,,-pipposc4.iD,this.a�)ph,catLon:- acres; to (current r r. 6, n- t, and
ounty(ies) Whererdsiduals7vdll be land -applied: Alexander;
l,­_App1_catio;,Nq!-.(willte peted"b.yPEM):
2. Specify whether project is: new; renewal*; X modification
*,For renewals, complete all sections included in the application, in addition, please submit updated cumulative loadings
for the ten ('10),pblititahts andIiipaai6d"o'wheri'a'greementtor!:i��
3. If this applicidon;';is,beifigsubtnitt6d.�as.,',a result,-of:a repew_aj;Qr,mqdtftcatjqpjo an,exisLing permi ..Iist.the existing permit
number. WQ0006 1 906 and its issue date November 13, 1992
FORM: LARS 06/94 :Page. 1 of J-§

k
111. FACILITY INFORMATION (attach" additional pagei for additional sources of residuals):
1. Name of facility where residuals are generated orr prepared- Town of Ta y 1 o r sV ij 1 e" - WWT P
2. Facility permit number: NC002627.1' facility permit Bolder: Town 6f -Taylorsvi.11e
3. Specify whether facility in Section 111. 1 is owned by: -federal;_ private; state; X local government.
4
4. Specify, facility design flo:,t�".'­30 mgd; facility average daily flow:" 4-00 mgd;
Ngesi�er',(aerobic)
Type of residual storage:
Volume of residual storage: 300,000 gallons
Length of residuals storage at facility: qfl days (the Division requires a minimum 30 days storage in units that
are separate from treatment system, i.e. not in clarifiers, aeration basins, etc.);
Maximum storage time of residuals between application events: 90 days.
Estimated volume of residuals: 85 (dry tons/yr.);
5. Are there any other storage facilities other than the above, currently on site:. Yes, X No.
-- If Yes, please identify:
6. Facility contact (person familiar with residuals preparation): Brian Eades
63M280
7. Facility contact's telepbone-.ziumber:
-8. Location of treatment facility:--Mi nni gan-- Lane- State; NC Al.pxandp'r' County­
9. Mailing address: 704 Main Avenue Drive SE, Taylor-wille'. NC 28681
10. Latitude: 35' 54' 25" Longitude: 8? 10' '00-11
1-1. SpSpecifyX, fy the source of the residuals....., i. treatment.6fdomestic wastewater, J.,treatment ofjndusuialwastewater;
other (explain):
Attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing process, or how the waste is generated. Provide full
and complete details of the entire- process.
12. Does the facility which generates the residuals have arn­=appioved pretreaiindnt program?'--L Yes;-'-: No.,
This includes facilities which are classified as a "Class I" facility (any publicly owned treatment works required, under, 40
CFR 403.8, to have an approved pretreatment program or any facUity t-r--ea-tin-g'-do-"m"e's'tic'-s-ew-a-'ge- that is classified as "Class
by -the appropriate federal or -State -authority.) -
RESIDUALS' INFORMATION '' (attgcb-. -:'add itibrial, pages - .for -additional sources :of­:r.esidu.als):
Information for Hazardous Waste (RCRA) Determination. The information requested on the limitations specified below
pertain only to those resid6al . s that are ge. nerated from A municipal wastewater treatment facility- with industrial -contribution
or active pretreatment program and from any other treatment facility with wastewater sources that include industrial sources.
a. Are any of theresiduals coyered.byti-s application listed in 40 CFR 261_31-261.33? -Yes; X No. If Yes,
list the number(s):
b. Do the residuals exhibit any of the four characteristics defined by 40: CFR 261.21-261.24? Yes; X No.
Attach laboratory results for the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Pr­6cedure Analyses,- Reaictivity.j- Ignitability, and
Corrosivity for each residual.
Note: If the following constituent levels (as ,determined by. the Toxicity- Characteristic Leachifigproceduie'Analyses) are
- "
exceeded in the residuals or if the pH of the residual is not within the range listed below, ' owresidual is by, the
definition A HdzAidofit waste:` Chemical analyses must be made:to Minimum Detection Levels---.
Arsenic
Benzene
FORM: LARS 06/94
5.0 Barium
0.5 Cadmium
Page ' 2 of 18
HIM
100.0
1.0

t.. Carbon tetrachloride
0.5
ChlOrobeaieBe ``
100.0
Chromium
5.0
m-Cresol
Cresol
200.0
200.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.5
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.7
.Endtin::.;, :!. .: ,. ; :
- " - 0.02
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
Hexachloroethane _
_ . „_ .3.0
Lindane.:.;__.......
0.4..
Methoxychlor;< : ..
; . .10.0'
Nitrobenzene
2.0
Pyridine
5.0
Silver. .. •:
.. 5.0
Toxaphene
0.5
2,4,5 Trichlorophenol,;;,.
400.0
2,4,5-TP"(Silvex) ..
4.0
pH, (2:1 vol./wC):
510 s.u. - <12.5 s.u.
Chlordane , .
0.03
Chloroform ` ` .
`6A
o-Cresol "' `:
200:6
p-Cresol
200.0
2,4-D
10.0
1,2-Dichloroethane
..-0.5
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.13
Heptachlor (and its hydroxide)
0-ON
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.5
.. .....
5.0
....
-Methyl ethyl ketone::.. '
200.0 '
Pentachloropheno]
100.0
Selenium
1.0
Tetrachloroethylene
0.7
Trichloroethylene
0.5
„ .,,. ;..2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
.: Vinyl
0.2
NOTE: IF ANY OF THE -RESIDUALS MEET° THE DEFINITIONS `OF AHAZARDOUS WASTE,
AS'�-I4O'rED 'Ilv EITHER "A OR " $ ABOVE, A` 'PERMIT' CANNOT- _BE_ ISSUED FOR
THAT -RESIDUAL AND IT SHOU.LD:'NO.T"BE` INCLUDED AS =PART OF THIS
2. For each residual, please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material: 3hu-
analysts must,be comprehensive enough
to, completely_ characterize the.residual,and:must, be based upon;a review of_the;processrthat,,generates,the material. If the
facility that will generate the residual is not yet in operation, the characterization -must be based on similar existing
facilities and projection based on the type of facility. The analysis must include a minimum of the following parameters
.,, and any. other known and suspected contaminants that are tributary to the system..,
IH
Arseiric Molybdenum J Calcium : Phosphorus .
Cadmium Nickel Magnesium Potassium
Chromium _
<<.. Selenium- Nitrate -Nitrite, taste,
_. _.... _.,..,.= , :-;� r.:._ .: , Nitrogen
Sodium .
e "um , Nt .
Copper Zinc " %.,Total Solids: T1W
Le Aluminum pH.: _,,
Mercury Ammonia -Nitrogen Plant Available Nitrogen
(by dalcu non)
3.. Wastewater residuals shall not be applied to the land if the concentration of.any llutant in the residuals exceeds the ceiling
concentrations specified in the table below Spectfy the pollutant concentration `ufthese residuals (attach lab.analysis):
- � Pollutant"` 'Pollutant Ceiling Concenfrati'on :(uig/kg); ; `t'poll utant:Concentration (mg/
Dry Weiebt Basis "'"
kg)
E �, -eight Basis
Cadrhium
S5
D:
:`Chromium``
3000 "
86. "
":.Copper-:.,.
4300'.. ;.._.-..
_, 17.2:.:_
Le--6d .:r:., . _ ...
840
i7:..: .
Mercur
57
Mol bdenurrl°
75 , :; ..
ND.:<....
Nickel.
420
34 ;
Seleruumt
100:.
1 16
;7500
FORM: LARS 06/94 Page 3."of 18

�r
V . PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION INFORMATION (attachadditional pages for
additional sources of residuals):
1. In accordance with 40 CFR Part 503, a residual cannot be land applied if it does not meet one of the following alternatives
for Class B pathogen reduction.
B1 Please specify a, bl,.b2; b3;,b4, b5,or;c.from below (submit all lab analysis, test results and. calculations):
a. at least.seven residuals samples should be collected at the time of use and analyzed for Fecal coliforms during each
monitoring period. The geometric mean of the densities of these samples will be calculated and should be less than
2,000,000-most probable number. per: gram"of total dry solids, or less than 2,000,000 Colony Forming Units per gram
of total dry solids.
b. the residuals must be treated by one of the following "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP).
1. Aerobic Di2estion = residuals are -agitated with air- 'or oxygen to maintain aerobic conditions for a mean cell
residence time and temperature between 40 days at 200 C and 60 days at 15° C. -_
2. in z - residuals are dried on sand beds or on paved or basins fora minimum of three months. During two of
the three, months, the: ambient. average daily temperature is above 09..C...- = - —
3 Anaerobic Digestion-'residtial's'are ,treated.in=the.absence of•air,for;a.mean cell residence time and temperature
between 15-days ae35°.0 to"55° C and-60,days-at20° C
4 Comp so tine - using either the within -vessel, static aerated pile, or windrow composting methods, the temperature
of the residuals are raised to 400 C or higher for five days. For four hours during the five days, the temperature in
the -compost pile exceeds 550-C ._..::
5. "'rime' StbiLiation - suffcieiit lime is added to th'e'residuals to raise the pH ofahe,'residuals to 12 after two hours
of contact'
c. The residuals shall be treated!by`a'pr`ocess that is'eq'uivOl ntto a' Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP),
as determined by the permitting authority, based on an evaluation of the recommendations provided by the Pathogen
Equivalency Committee.
2. In addition;'when residuals are being land applied, at least one of the following vector attraction reduction requirements (a,
b, c, d, e, f, g; h; i, or j) described below -must be meta
Specify the letter(s)''of,the-vector'attraction reduction equiremeiit that have been met (submit lab results, test
T,. ,"
results and calculations): "Any'variation of the below must be described in full detail and attached.
a. 'A�robic or'Anaerobic'Dt ion The mass of volatile solids are reduced'by.at least 38°k , Volatilesolids;reduction is
measured between 'the 'resi us, prior to stabilization, and the residuals ready for use or disposal. This criterion should
be readily met by,properly designed and operated, anaerobic digestors' but -not as'readilymet by aerobic digestors.
'Treatment facilities with aerobic digestors may heed to meet the vector attraction reduction requirement through 18c or
b. Anaerobic Digestion - If 38% volatile solids reduction cannot be achieved, vector attraction reduction can be
demonstrat,ed'by further digesting a portion of the previously digested residuals in a bench scale unit for an additional
40 days at 30° C to 37° C:' If, at the end of the-40 days,- the volatile solids are reduced by less than 17%, vector
attraction.reduction is achieved..
c. Aerobic Dig ,, ion - If 38% volatile solids reduction,cannot be achieved, vector attraction reduction can be demonstrated
by -further digesting a portion of the previouslydigested residuals that have a solids content of 2°k or less in a bench
- scale unit for an additional at-20° C.---If;,-at the end of the 30 days, -the volatile solids, are reduced by less than
15%, vector attraction reduction is achieved.
d Aerobic Digestion -The spec oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) shall be:equal to,orless than.l:5 $tilligrams:of oxygen
per hour per gram of total dry -solids at 200'C-=;'- .
e. . Aerobic Processes.-_The.temperature-of the residuals -for -at least 14 days shall be -greater than 40° C. During this time,
the ay eraQe temperature shall be greater than.45q C,_......._,.___,...; _._
f. Alkaline stabilization - The pH of the residuals is -raised to 12 or higher by alkali addition and, without the addition of
more alkali; remains-at,12 or higher for 2 hours and"then at 11.5 or higher for an additional 22 hours.
FORM: LARS 06/94 Page. 4 of 18. ,

g ping 1 6d"cnIi' not t tabdized solids and
& -total solids of - that 1&.1 . contain uns which are generated
u�16'6r'greater -di" th materials is not
�p,A primarywasteWater, treatment process, shall be Blending wi o er
allowed to achieve the tot, solid -,percentage..
h D13dn Z fun stabiliz ed soU&YThe total'solids of residuaji that "contains -'u"n"S'tait)Mzed Whi&ire­kenerated in a
.primary ,.i�aste.w.a,t..a,. apal.rn.ent process , shall be equal to o gre,ater than 9.0 Blending with other materials is not
allowed to achieve the'thtal si:81ids"06tcentage."'
i Injection - Liquid residuals are injected below the land surface, with no significant amount 6ff6iduals present on the
1AM,'surfaceafter 1-hour :unless ,:the residuals are Class A for pathog eq, reduction In this case; the -residuals shall be
injected within 9-hours after being discharged from the pathogen treatment process. ,
into the soilyd n ehburs of application,
%qfitati6n ­;Residwas:tbit are:gwface laiid-applied shall be incorppm-
unless the residuals are . Class A for pathogen reduction. In this case; theresiduals ihall.b,e.mq9r .incorporated within-8 hours
after (Bcharga 'frbni:thd',pathogen'tr'eatment-process�4�,-,.,
-
VI. RESIDUALS �`TRkNS PORT
J
See P I'Wn -:,&f Operation
1�­� b U the residuals bgkUv�q (Iijk,pr tru&S, ett.,?,?,_
H wwi q4 tq, Oq ap . - . , ­�.. P _�
,plication sites
­1
S - 0pera on ,.,,
2. What type�.of-equipm6twill be udliz&d:fbr1and application?.: pe, Kan -of
01 the application of the residual be controlled to ensure that there is proper distribution over the site?
'Plaw1of Opera :4,
�
4. Will the -land application operation utilize a contracCor
whospecializes i" ;-R6sidbals`kanageiiieniv or" will the permittee
-management the'pr6gram.21 Periiiittee�,,',If�a-.coritraCtori�5,utiliz_ea.
d-_,prpyide the name of the firm, a
contact, address, and telephone number: Bio Gro Division of Wheel abrator4it' F'Technolbqies 'I c.
X
'b
'�.-VIIr3-SITE-'"E';VALUATION- ANI)r-)RECOMNIENDED-LOADING RATES:
'A
"t, o g"fi6s"ifMb�-tsedf6r-.Iaiid'a� i n -La.]:
I win- 2 s perm-it1pplication. [please Attach map.(s),��
Applkaii6fi Area [aci6s] Maximum Slope
T
Note: If more than ten (10) sites are to be covered by this -application, please attach a form listing all of the sites along
-with. the information listed below::::-,
r
a. A vicinity map must be attached. This map must...::show -the Jocation of each site in relati6h to. at least two
geographical references and major intersection (numbered roads, named streams/riyers, etc.).
FORIM: LARS 06/94 .page`' 5` of 18

b. For all new or modified sites, a detailed site location map must be attached delineating both total and buffered acres.
This map must be drawn to scale with topographical contour intervals not exceeding ten feet or 25% of total site relief
(whichever is more descriptive) and showing the property lines; all existing wells, all surface waters and drainage ways
and all dwellings within 500 feet of the land application areas; and all buffers.
Tote: At least the following buffers must be maintained. If residuals are sprayed on the sites, larger buffers may be
required
1. 400 feet from any habitable residence or place of public assembly under separate ownership or which is to be sold
for surface residual application,
200 feet from any habitable residence or place of public assembly tinder separate ownership or which is to be sold
for subsurface residual injection.
2. 100 feet between the disposal area and any public or private water supply source, all streams classified as WS or B,
waters classified as SA or SB and any Class I or Class 11 impounded reservoir used as a source of drinking water t
3. 100 feet between any surface residual application area and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way,
50 feet between any subsurface residual injection area and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way.+
4. 50 feet between the residual application area and property lines for both surface and subsurface application (if the
original permit was issued with the buffer distance to property line as 100 feet, updated
maps must be submitted and new acreage delineated for the buffer to be reduced).
5. 10 feet between the disposal area and any interceptor drains or surface water diversions (upslope).
6. 25 feet between the disposal area and any interceptor drains or surface water diversions (downslope).
7. 25 feet between the disposal area and any groundwater lowering and surface drainage ditches.
t SPECIFY THE NAME OF AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE CLOSEST DOWNSLOPE SURFACE WATERS
(as established by the Environmental Management Commission) TO THE LAND APPLICATION SI7E(S)• USE
THE ATTACHED INFORMATION SHEET (PAGE 9 OF 18) TO OBTAIN THIS INFORMATION.
Tote: The maximum slope for land application of residuals is 10% for surface application and 19% for subsurface
application.
2. For each land application site, attach a soil evaluation by a soils scientist (the evaluation must be signed by the soil
scientist) which addresses soil color; the depth, thickness and type of resuictive,horizons; the presence or absence of a
seasonal high water table or bedrock within three vertical feet of the deepest point of residual application; pH and cation
exchange capacity. if the depth to either groundwater or bedrock is less than three feet, please also attach a demonstration,
using predictive calculations or modeling methods acceptable to the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management, that the use of this site will not result in the contravention of classified groundwater standards as contained in
NCAC 2L .0200. In no case shall the separation be less than one foot. This report must be signed by the soll
scientist and submitted with application.
3. For each site, please attach a project evaluation conducted by an agronomist including recommendations concerning cover
crops and their ability to accept the proposed loading of liquids, solids, nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, salts and any
other contaminant know to be in the residual. A part of the agronomists recommendations must be a crop management
plan. This plan must determine the crops to be grown on the site(s), when they should be grown and how they should be
harvested and marketed. This report must be signed by the agronomist and'submitted with application.
4. Attach a representative soils analysis of each site. The soils analysis shall include the following parameters, along with
any other significant parameter that has been shown to be contained in the residual:
Standard Soil Fertility Test (which includes): pH Phosphorus Potassium
Acidity Calcium Manganese
Magnesium Zinc Copper
% Huatic Matter Sodium Cation Exchange Capacity
Base Saturation (by calculation)
And the following Metals: Arsenic Lead Nickel
Cadmium Mercury Selenium
Cbromium Molybdenum
5. In order to assist DEM in the review of the proposed loading rates, please complete the calculations contained in the
anachment titled "Calculations Work Sheet" (beginning on Page 11 of 18). if more than one residual is to be covered by
this permit, additional worksheets must be attached.
FOR11. LARS 06/94 Page 6 of 18

VIII. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Five .(5). complete copies of thepermit application and five (5).copie,s of all required supporting information, including
* will cover le rs must su te application
ap, cati n package w .l . be returned as incomplete-.
2. Please explain how access to the land application sites,,by.both people and animals, will be controlled following the
application of residuals: See Operations Plan
I
'
I 'a. Anima"Isshdl'n-otl);e=graiedonthe landapplication 'sites 'within 30 days after the application of residuals:,
b. Appropriate measures must be taken to control public access to the land application sites during the active site use and
for 12 months following the last application event- Such controls may include the p . os4g .'of signs'indicating the
activities being conducted at the site.
3. -PleaseexPlain the procedures that will be used to establish and maintain the buffers during the application process (i.e. will
,
the sites be flagged): See Operations Pl,an
4. Please attach an executed "Agreement For the Land Application of Residuals to Private =L-ands; - ior"ea''cl -land-applicatibb'gite
that is not owned by the applicant. Apopy,
* of the DEM approved form is attached. If the applicant wishes to use a
different form or a modified form, pnor appr:&V: afmus
5. Each application site must be assigned a site identification number.,
6. Attachments may be utilized to provide the information that is requested in this, application form; however, if attachments
are utilized, their location should be so indicated on the application form. hAll atta&hir umW6d to corresp6bd
to the individual parts of the application that require the attachment. If the attachmentsare t part of a, iargelr"docimeq a
table must be provided that lists the locations of the required information.*
Applic nt's :Cer f] �cation,:
UAV I'D '0 Nanest that this application for: _-­`10 W."/_ .0
-Zh&k_�u,' lit —
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that ii-altreqiftd: supporting'.-i ;nfonnatiooii--a4d;. tt2(p4pdnts X&--,not,-,included;1 this -#pp ck-a e pa 9
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date ?
THE COMPLETED APPLICATIQNTACKAGE, INCLUDING,.,ALL. SUPPORTING INF,ORNIATIO-N.AND
MATERIALS, SHOULD BE -SENT -TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
3,
NORTH ,CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT-
:POS.T_OFFIQE .BOX_29535,
R_A,LEIGH, NORTH -CAROLINAr,�;27626-.0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: LARS,06/94 Page 7 of 18

0.
essing, of this -applicationwill not be initiated, until five (5) copies of all of the following
to,fi 'b(5)*'6ojpi6s of the c6rnp'leted i iplicati6n!"form. If
qW.s. 116vebebn submitted in addition v
. -.1.. '-fr- '11i package, 'pl . ease' explain.
ny of the below, items have been excludedom c
1.
Is--a_general , lo.catio.n.map--included?
Y.E.S. X or NO
,
Is a site map, (drawn---to-isr-ale)l.;.included-.wh.ich rdelineates -totalan ._0,reA:.. apres., and
line
shows all property lines, buffers, existing wells witliih 500 feet, topography, drainage
- I
-features, and 'any "surface "-w-at9
waters
X YES or'NO
3. Is a vl�c- -,y-nip,enciosea-wh,ioh'cle,ady:L ation 'with -respect to
State,roads .and -named...Su.r-face, waters?_-,
..... . . . .....
_V,
d hic fif" ­th':'j"'R`
1. Is a signed. soil sq'ientist report include.,,vy..., s _t�o,qe e,jq�qw...
a) field descriptions of texture, color, and structure,
b) depth and thickness of soil horizons,,
c) presence of any restrictive soil horizons or layers,
depth to ;of
high151eA
'' ,,- water ta--ii-'
e hydraulic con ud ivi y,.,-.-
f) recommended lo_a:din'g­7 ate -for th' 'sit bi
YES X or NO
5. Is a signed agronomist's report includ.e*d which identifies the crop;__Cqhd--I­0ading
.--recommendations. for_ N7P-nK?;
8. �'I9AhW­0,--fo'1 p ana "M t- 'rit�PIan,lin-cludedTin,r-thei-a'opVicationipackage?..jz.d.-.,�-�.r.ii?,..f,,-,it--,r
geme
YES X or NO
7. Has the Land Owner's agreement - be-'e--n-- co'm'-'p-l-e'--t-"-e-d-a--n-d"--si'g--n-e-d?
YES )( or NO
�� �.­ I". �: � i -_, 1 ` - '' 0, ­ "" ­­ .)(5 98
B.- Ap"prop6ate fee in accio'rd-�n-db with',15,A NCA _,2H`.0205(c Xbff. ebril - di�y 1A0
New Applications, Modifications or Late Renewals $400.00
Timely Renewals without Modifications
0 0—,
3
YES X or NO
9. Five (5) copies of all reports, evaluatibhs7t,­agreem-enf s,-�sOl5porting calculations, etc. must
be inclued as a part of th6.-'-'aoolidAtion.-pAdkage.v�! -'.. :_'l >­ . A.
.. .— .. __ _:`i` a Si. = � 4.' �.��.. �...:.`.. .. .. _ , '_ .... .
FORM: LARS 06/94 Page 8 of 18

UCr11VK 1"IUUICtJV1LLr- KU rdX • (V4-000-0U4V mug 1 7o 10 - 10 r. V11VL
Aug - O 1- 15A, P) P . 02
This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Office and included with the
submission of tine opplication package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
in order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will be
located, you are required to submit this form, whit items 1 through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division of
Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see attached listing). At a minimum, you must
include an 33" by I I" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the subject
surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters (waters for
which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may not be
submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (Ply Specify titC name of the municipality, corporation, individual. or other ):
2. Name and Complete Ad of Applican[: , ► ■ r d-
(9titb 1; Q. nr Ls r&&244iU]40 A110Ou& B__ qx.
zi • z-� fig! '
City: State: p•
Telephone umber.
3. Project Name: o N a -E
4. Volume of residuals to be land applied: dry tons per year
5. Name of closest surface wants:
6. County(s) where land application site is located:
7. Map [tame and dau: Q a• T Qr , IV e. 14 20
8. Applicant Signature:
TO: REGIONAL 'WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities will occur,
as identified on the attached map segment:
Name of surface waters: 4!91"'IelWk CI-2 e _
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission): 601 .
Proposed Classification, if applicable:
Signature of mgional office petaonrtel: G'�L Date:
i1, FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 9 of 18

c -3,
-CALCULATIONS-WORK- SHEET'
is work sheet is designed to assist the Division of Environmental Management in -reviewing' this'application as expeditiously as
ssible. Its preparation in a complete and'kcnrate'ffAriner is critical to -this review. For permits that cover multiple sources of
residuals or different residuals from the -same-source, use additional work sheets,..-
A List the specific residu'iil°`thit'is'cdier6d-'-,by-ihese ... calciii -a' do fis­,(place­-or process of origin)
Town of Taylorsville, NC aerobically diges-ted­§judge.
: ry.,-.Wm pf,-t14§ residual.to be land,ap liedeach yearl
What are.the,-.,toWA p
d'
Total DryTons = Gallons of Residuals* 9b­lj Sos"­*'9.341b`sjg o
produced annually A,00
2,000"Ibs./ton
Total Dry Tons 8.34 lbs./gallon
100,­
2,000 lbs./ton
Dry. '
Tons'per year
If the quantity..of residual will vary sRgh-ific­a-nay,­oi,.if -theiv. will be -,,a largot'. initial application, please attach a detailed
explanation and provide calculations for each variation.
B. Complete. the following calculations to establish the portion of the residual that is made
up of carious par
% Total Solids • 74
(PLEASE DOTE THAT ALL`CONSTITUENTS`ARE'.! TO BE -IN -TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS)
'
PARAMETER
mg/L
r % Solids (Decimal)_
mgfkg -(dry mvt.)
x 0.002-
= lbs./dry ton
Arsenic---
.-005994----
81
x _0,002
00.162
CaCadmiumND
x 0.002
Chromium
.6364
.0074
= 86
.172
Copper
1.2728
.0074.
2'-- ­3
jOIRONJI
.344
1258
0 0022
034
Mercury
=-.39
x, 0.002.
.00078
Molybdenum
`6001
Nickel
.2516 -
­0074,
= 34
x 0.002
= .068
Selenium
.008584
.0074
1.16
x 0.002
= . n0232
Zinc
2.5604
34.6­­.
x 0.002
= .692
9,9..g..
.0074
= 13500.
x 0.002
=27
-Anu-nonia-N
Calcium
4.4
--.-0074.
6000.'"
x 0.002
=12
Magnesium
19.98
-.0 074
27�.Q
x
=5.4
"N2
0
189
x 0.002
.378
9'* Pff6,sPh0fu
1,0-21--1., 86
-:6074
=13900.
slum
45.14
.0074,
--6'100
100 2 -:
1-2. �.2
F5.48 V.1w,
- .0074
10200
i U.602]
= 2 0.'4197.2
-Sodium
TKN.
�29.64
.0074
'
9.86Q0
'
I 'X 0 001
FORM: LARS 06/94 Page 11 of 18

C. Plant Available Nitrogen, (PAN) calculations and land application area requirements:
CONSTITUENTS
MgfKg DRY WEIGHT
TKNI
-:'.1'.98600'
'AMMONIA-N.....P.,
13500'
L�NO3-NO2-N
18 1 9
-.-.l-..-.-Mineralization-Rate.(MR) 30 %
f :1j:jd jjsij�d1or-doinestic wastewater -treatment
(These values can be established for the specifl. S' dtial& & au t v' u'es,cali
residuals. If actual values are established, attach the documentation. The default values are as follows):
Unstabihzed Primary and Secondary Residuals
Aerobically Digested Residuals 30.%_
Anaerobically Digested Residuals 20%
.:
Composted Residuals 10%
(If the default values are used, arch an explanation -as to why. -the sp6dific.chQseq default value is appropriate.)
2. Complete the following calculations for the ap e. note, the Mineralization
application. proposed (Pleas
Rate [MR] -should -be utilized in the following-Eak i66 is. a decimal)
TAN for:Surface t_;.Applica.tj
o.n
PAN= [(MR) x (TYN -NIH3)] +.5 x (NH3) + (NO3-NO2-N-)
n
3 X.. Qh�
PAN 3G 98600" 1 5 0 0'
PAN = 32469 -PPM Dry Weight
"tRAN r -S Application.
-
PAN
N027N) (N 7
.7;[(?�R7) , x , (TKN N"H91
-+-(NH3) 03
�5G0­_1­1­­_­_­­_ 18 9 3 .30, "798600 )+
P,
3. Total PAN
Total dfY ��'of residual to be land applied per-�y�ar:
s Total�Y
-g
-PAN in -,pounds-, 4 - - TAN inl� j/k -Dry Weight) X;2000 Po4ds I Ton
per"dry-ton 1,000,000,
­(PAN,in PPM Dry Weight)--x 0-002
,-,-
78.43 Pounds/Dry TonNear
AID'in Pounds Dry Ton) x Total tons of residual to be land applied
_...._.____Total_PAN_in_ pounds-_-,....
_.x­1....85- --dtl.y
4.
6 67-.2 -PoundsNear
? ... .....
-Due totfie:.,fact+tfiat- organic nitrogen is �miner�,slowly-over.,time,,the-amount.of.nitroRenthai comesavailablein years
-, -
application must be taken into consideration when calculating application rates for the -su sequent
th -k§ i4act-on-loading rates.: Show the idjuited Pan
years.-.:7,.bis,,,bein:g, the- case, plea -se attach an evaluation o is-Tact6fand
foratleast five years:
The -maximum adju-sted1rinual PAN is . ............
See -at-tachment_nurnber- 8__1_.A.____._-"--­-,
FORM: LARS 06/94 Page 12 of 18

P
'Crop lforma"on `on nitrogen uptake per Year,-,,
(Division Recommendations) (Provide, for the Crops Specified)
?4
1.W,
Crop(s) PA'�6VS-/icredyear) , 'PAI(i6'siac�roy.i 2
Alfalfa 200
Bermuda' Grass (Hay;;Pasture)
120—
Com (Grain)--_-... 1 60'.-
Corn (SUagp),,,:,,-:.-, 200
Cotton. 70
a
Fescue 250
Forest (Hdkd I w
"d &-S6ftwood)­
Mao
7 100
Small diair`f (Wfiek,-barley,oats)
Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture)-._-_.
Sbighumi, Sddex:-(Silage)., 220
200
---Tim othy,'.Orchard, -&..Rye. Grass -20.0
Please prop ide the basis for the uptake rates `-used-if Vfdf&rit1E9i'DiVisi= Recommendations:
v-t
4.
5. Total acres needed to land apply &'poiinds-bif available -nitrogen 'calculated above
Total acres neededJtotal b6u'-n s'df Man t available ntf6gen-(PAW `64'1&of nitrogen needed for 6r6*:-`
3 arares­. e -3- -nE!e d
Jli
Minimum
ln acres need
ed based on most restrictive PAN acres - ------
ill "e;" alue for the crop to be grown that has the lowest nitrogen uptake rate per -acre:- must ,v per -acre...- ­
If there are various crops -that -will only- be- utilized for-cCftain,sites, -please attach the calculations for each site and detdrmine
the total heeded acnis`6sinp the format outlined above.
Calculate Ahe_.S_odWm..,A d s,pfp 0q;x__F4#q
OAThis section -must �,.-.completed.in mg/l, to, convert:.. mg/kg x %.solids [as,A,jdecim all m,g/l##),
Milli Equivalent ,+ [0.5, i
-(Ca'MiUi -Equivalent-+,Mg-Milli-Equivale .5 ..... ....
F4WvaIenrW6ight7 ....... _;­­­ Milli Equivalents -of Ion- -
SODrUM (Na) 76.48­ 13'i = -8..28 v.. 97­d_..
r:
CALCIUM (Ca) 44.4. (mg/1) '2,22 ;j $,
MAGINT-srum (Nlg)19 - 98 (mg1l) 12 1.66
SAR = 2.35
FORM: LARS W94 Page 13 cift-18
J.

ip�_idual or site,please.- attach. - a
V, If calculation - sheets are being completed for more.,-Ahan one---,r
summary, sheet that bring the results of all the calculation sheets to one point.
PE. aermngtle,", site:,,
The -lifetime pollutant -loadings shall not be exceeded. The' site life is determined by calculating the numWof -years that the site
can receive the residual without exceeding the lifetime pollutant loadings. The site life calculations will be based on the most
t.t6t' ' d '
�naximumt'&Yth�' re diiiis Ian applied
r6sMddV6bf6p'pl;in't'dVgldble'iiitMgen (PAN) requirement specified and the sit- si'
annually —Therefore, in.the table below the Tons of Residdals to be Applied/AcreNear will be calculated as.,
1.._Most.restncuve_crop.based 9R;4e plant available nitrogen (PAID fescue requirement:
250
--,---Associated--plut-available nitrogen (PAN) requirement'-
2. --Minimum 'acres "needed '-based on most restrictive PAN (as found in C.5 above)
e, -
3. Dry Tons of Residuals to be land applied per year 85
.. ........
(lbsJacre/y6ar)"
26.6 acres
4-.—Tons-of-Rt--siduals-to-be-Applic,d/Acre/Year= - TonsNearof Residuals to be land Uplied'-
Minimum number of acres required for land. application
V
...---Tons-of Residuals. to.-be.Applied/Acre[Year 3.2 CID ;t
"
If any -of the _application,si.Les�amjOe loaded at greaterihhfi the rate specified abovqji,.p!COe;,sPe4;ifv the loading ate and 6xPlain
Tons zf-Residuals.-to-be-App4e4cVAqrefYear (different from above) - - - - - - -
Explanation:
t Z. 7777 -.7 n i Zb-1 Ij
..-In-the-table-below I -thQ-hip-best annual I ding. (Tons of Residuals to be Applidd/Acre/Year) specified above, will be multiplied
by the lbs./dry ton of each pollutant as found in B above. The Site Life can then be, determmed
Site Life (Years) = AlloWOle Lifetime Loadings (Ibs./acre)
Projected Pounds to be DiD ie cre ta
�
Pollutant
Residuals to-bgT
Applied pei
--Acre-per-Year-
Ibs./dry. ton -of each
(asfoundinPartB lApplied/Acre
above)
-d,
Pounds to e.
fYea r -
'Allowable Lifetime,
"
Pollutant Loadings.
(lbs./acre)
`­'Sfie Life
(Years)
Arsenic
'1. 2
.00162
.005
36
=7200
Cadm"I'U"M"
-3-2­
-007
0
Chrornhitn-' -°­
'550
-
-2677,
=.4867
7 CoppeT_
;3,2.*,.
.44 ..3
1,338
1216
Lead
3.2
034
267
Mercury
3.2
.00078
09,2
J 5,
=7, .5,QQ
__374
1780-,-.,
�=
UM
Selenium
._.0022
.007
89 _. I
12, 714
_13.2
Zinc
13.2.
"_
22­
2A 98
I f3 5"
Compare the nine (9) pollutants above and determine which pollutant that will result in the sbortest life for this site..,
The Limiting Pollutant is Zinc
The Site Life is` 1135 years. Also see attaC1hMent--huft16:6r 8.
FORM: LARS 06/94 Page, 14 of,48

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMIENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIMATE LANDS
40mittee:
TOWN OF TAYLORSVtLT F
'ontactPerson: David Robin,�~te Eahllir Waretc
AddressofPermittee:204 Hain A-v ,i Dr. S E. Taflo:svi11e ,': 23031
Phone ( 704) 632-
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands: Liquid Aerobically D i e t e 3
Site ID Number: , See Site Specific _Ln,fo
Field Number: See site Soecific Info
'.ocation of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
Owner of Property used for residual application: �.. : sE e S i c e Data
.essee of Propcny (if appropriate):
See Site Data
Land use or cropping panerns:
Intended use or disposition of crops: Not for Direct Human Consumption
a * ! • * * ! • i t * * a 0 • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * a * * * r * * • * * a * • t f • * t f
Che undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
iereinafter referred to as the Perminee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location
shown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The
andowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied
_esiduals while the Permitt.ee receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the
disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of
;nvironmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each time the land application
nermit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Pennittee agree to abide with
ie following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owIlgr's Agree, ment .
;otifcation of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
TORM: LARS 06/94
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Page 15 of 18

STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual application
and to established monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the residual land
application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to
commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning
the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of
constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns
and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil
analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals
may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied
to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner of his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the
intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee
to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the
NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine residual
application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or
Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms
and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
FORM: LARS 05/94 Page 16 of 18

r
14: 'Phis'Agreemem shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following the
residual application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be
used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner that
gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified
by this permit, is prohibited.
RESTRICTIONS:
FORM: LARS 05/94 Page 17 of 18

y
have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission
m y to the Permittee to apply slud9presidual to my lands as specified herein.
Land Owner
% //D % mo
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that:D ��
- - G
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of l®wtw , 19�
J,
444;& j� 4--
INWAIRY PUBLI
My commission F2 ®oa
SEAL:
4 CIP
eG W? -J3
41
9 toy 0
°q�
I, ��•b O have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
ZL
the stipulations and restric ' s as specified herein..
Lessee
Date
I, 04V I R0 4 W eft have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Permittee
Date
FORM: LARS 05/94 Page 18 of 18

I, have.read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission
to the Permittee to ap y sludge/residual to my lands as specified herein:
f, Land Owner _
.. _:`Date _... . .. .... .. ....._., ,,, ..
NORTH CAROLINA, . G i" OUNTX
• r
I, the undersigned Notary Publicdo;hereby certify that
s _ , ...
personally appeared before me this day `and acknowledged ,the due execution If the forgoing instrument.
W SS my;hand and official •,seal -thus day of ,.19 —
My commisston,Epr
1-4
SEAL:. ��� J.,�0``�
o�
have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and res ictions as specified herein.
Lessee
fZ (e7
Date
####*#####*##*####*#***#####*###*######*#*##**#**#*#*###
1, A V),0 (�o f N C -f have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Permittee
Date
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 18° of 18

Rufb 1.1 "7b 10r-.3GMrl IVPA■ Vr fM 1l_V.1Jv 1LlL
Aug-08-96 09:6 A
P.01
J �
have Hasa Ws land o s agreem eat and do 0 Wy 5 v6l � Pu
4101piaaidml�tcq t � to m' hods as spec" hw -
Land Owner
• Dltte .
NORTH CAROLINA, ®ter COUNTY,
I. the undetsipaed Now Public. do bemby Ce.a fy that
personoy appm d betas tag this day and acknowledged the due exeCutiOO Of the forgoing instrument.
WMESS my hand and of&W a d this day of
NOTARY PUB C
SEAL: A,�� J
0 la
L%Cj
:fin'---- - ................
II
i• .wd &I. 1®!d &-A A. Stw..6V .,w+tw •hiM I.y
tb• `etruliea• .rsaleer r ��+.
- LCSSEC
Dim
r ✓ 2 y f uave rm wu =a gwwrs agm=c u mu oo =my &vs e w awe Toy
she WPM" xuwkdm • sPccilW herein.
Penniaee
+-- FOA14l. LAOFA *V" rose Is of We

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Section 2.0 Attachments
Attachment 1: Owners and Addresses
Attachment 2: TCLP Test Results
Attachment 3: Biosolids Analysis
Attachment 4: Treatment/Stabilization Process
Attachment 5:
Operation Plan
Attachment 6:
Soil Scientist's Report
Attachment 7:
Agronomist's Report
Attachment 8:
Site Life Evaluations
:.;:::.;;;:.;:.::.;;:.;:.;:;:.::.;:.:;.:.:.:................................ .
:.......................................................................... .....
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Tavlorsville Land Application Sites
Aftachment 1: Owners and Addresses
Robert Lynn Marshall
Routa4. Box4O1
Taylorsvi||e.NC20O81
704.632.6190
William H.Marshall
728Hastings Hill Road
KernenviUe.NC282B4
910.788.8955
Donald G.Payne
45OOPaul Payne Store Road
Tovon;vUm.NC28681
704.632.8223
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Attachment 2: TCLP Test Results
Please note that TCLP testing is required only once during the life of the permit.
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

PAR
PAR Laboratories; Inc.
2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
LABORATORIES, INC.
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
April 1, 1992
Reference No:
92 1134
Made For:
Bio Gro Systems
12701 Lancaster Highway
Pineville, NC 28134
Attention:
Robert Hamilton
Analyses of:
Submitted sample for TCLP
Marked:.
Wastewater sample from Taylorsville
Received On:
3/19/92
Analyses:
pH Value
6.5
Corrosivity
Non
Reactivity
Non
Flash Point (°F)
>200
Ignitability
Non
(ppm)
Arsenic
<•5
Barium
<10
Cadmium
<•1
Chromium
<•5
Lead
<•5
Mercury
<•02
Selenium
<•1
Silver
<•5
Paint Filter Test Free Liquid
U
_ ._ .....��-��--.^ >>-:,. ,..:air r c nr ... -.. -�,- .• 'y . ! '.1 : /. 'F� � .. .,

R
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
caBORATORIES.INC.
2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
Reference No.
92 1134 Continued
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlordane
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
o-Cresol
m-Cresol
p-Cresol
Cresol
2,4-D
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
.2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Endrin
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Lindane
Methoxychlor
Methyl ethyl ketone
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-TP Silvex
Vinyl Chloride
Respectfully Submitted:
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
John S. Rice
Laboratory Director
a
<.05
<,05
<.003
<10
<.6
<20
<20
<20
<20
<1
<.75
<.05
<.07
<.013
<.002
<.0008
<.013
<.05
<.3
<.04
<1
<20
<.2
<10
<.5
<.07
<.05
<.2
<.02
<.1
<.02
k

Town of Tavlorsville Land Application Sites

_
- ) '
��K EASTERN LABORATORIES, � �m m~ »�»�~�n u~nun� ����oxn����u~n ��xu��u~ INC.no���
7621 Whh8piO8ROad ° Richmond, Virginia 23237 ° /804\743-9401
Fax No. /804\271-6446
RO62-3O6 ACCOUNT 45469 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER
BIO GRO SYSTEMS INC
12071 LANCASTER HIGHW1jY
HWY 521 SOUTH
PINEVILLE NC 28134
L�B NUMBER = 41190
S")MPLE ID = 1 OF 1
RESULT
PARAMETER ( % )
---.... .... -.... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... --------
SOLIDS
NITROGEN (TKN)
PHOSP�ORUS
POSIUM
SULFUR
C�LCIUM
M�GNESIUM
SODIUM
IRON
MANGA�ESE
COPP[R
ZINC
AMMONI) NITRO[
1*1103-NO2 NITROE
C�DMIUM
CHROMIUM
NICKEL
LEAD
AtL
TOWN OF TAYLORSVILLE ROBERT HA.MILTON
COPY TOH" ANNAPOLIS
`
BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS REPORt�
`^ DAT[ SAMPLED 03/14/96
'�ATE RECEIV[D O3/18/96
REPORTED 03/21/(p6
DETECTION
RESULT LIMIT ofNI",LYSIS
(MG/KG) (MG/KG) ANALYST Df�,TE
-.... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... -.... .... .... .... .... ... .... -.... .... -------
METHOD REFERENCE
----------------------
O~74
740O
1OO
J C M
03/18/96
SM
254��
9.86
986OO
1OO
KCS
O3/19/96
EP�
351^3
1^39
139OO
10O
DHC
O3/19/96
EPh
365^4
O^61
610O
1OO
DCN
O3/19/96
SW
846-601O
01-69
6900
10O
DCN
03/19/96
SW
846-6010
0^60
600O
1OO
DCN
03/19/96
SW
846-6010
0^27
2700
1OO
DCN
O3/19/96
SN
846-601O
1^O2
1O200
1O0
PCC
O3/19/96
�W
846'6O1O
655O
1
D C N
O3/19/96
S�
846-6011,31
71
1
DCN
03/19/96
SW
846-6010
172
|
DCN
O3/19/96
SW
846-6O1O
346
1
DCN
03/19/96
SW
846-6O1O
13500
1OO
LDR
O3/19/96
EPYj
350^2
�N
189
1O
LDR
O3/19/96
EP�
353^1
ND
1
DCN
03/19/96
SW
846-6010
86
5
DCN
03/19/96
SW
846-6010
34
5
D C N1
03/19/96
SW
846-6O1O
17
5
D�N
O�/19/96
SW
84�-6010
(.L
A /1) 1
�LL VALUES EXCEPT SOLIDS AND TSS ARE ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS. �-�p �-
�^ ^
PAUL C^ H^ CHU C/ NPRM0� �ONE�
Our �por�mm�on�amnrme�muv*oand nnnodonno|use mour u�nm.�mmay not uo�pmuu�dinwhole o,mpo�.nor may any memmmuvm����n �-~~
work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. oopynom1e7r

R062-'-306
REPORT NUMBER
A & L EASTERN AGRICULI JRAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road - Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
ACCOI.JNT 45 469 PA C7 2
C'iRC) f:iYSTEMC) T'NC:
.120 '1 1...ANCA:iiT'I:::l I-1:1:f1FIWAY
1-1WY 21. SC)LJTI"I
F, IN NC; 2 G 1.34
I._('11:<. NUMDI":F, :::: 41.:1.90
f
S 14, M P L. E :I: Li J. 0F' :1.
T C)WN OF 1.16I YI...C)F;SV .* L.I...17.
It10ED01...:I:j .*) ANoL.Y�'T,'1:i F;I:::F'C)F0,
xlE T,E:(:.'r:F.C.)N
F1E:Sl.Jl...'T RESULT I.-1:MI'T ANAI...YS1: ,
I"AF;AME::'rE:F; ( ) (MG/KG) (11Ci/KG) ANALYST DATE''
AFL
1;C'1DF.::RT 1'9Ai''1:1:1...'T'CIN
C;OF'Y TC) T ANNAF'CA.A.* S
DATE f:1r'1MF,I...IH'D 033/14/96
rIF,1TE: RE C:I::::1:4'E,D 03/:I8/96
>IA'T1i:: 1::, 1': 'I'f:::JCI i?:7/.'.:L/tr6
ME"1'I"IC)S:! F';I:::F,E::I;is
A{,tiL:.N.It.:
0.811.
0.4
SIt.' N
() .3/?',>/ `IF1
t"1
?
L. , -`t 6....7()61
ME:::r;C:LJRY
0.39
1
L'!C:N
03/20/ 6
C),W
8'46 -74 1
SF::I...I:::N:F.LJM
J..1.6
0.:1.
rlC:N
0:3/20/96
SW
f346 -T7 41
PI -I (;a'T'AN'D(ItF"D UN:I:'PS
/ . 0
M
03/:I.`:1196
I:::f')
:I.:`.;U.:I.
i A...I TAJN' ("AF;S:t(:)N(1i i'I::: E U
0171
7:1. ?0
100
KC'
0:3:'I.9/96
A:TM
; ():r
() L.°11,1: :I:
. k{.
'V 1.)
:I. ((f
L. I l I i
(i :3 ,' :I. ' !'r 6
<:i i S
' ;: 4 () Ci
f:)FiCiANA, Cl C)GI:::T'd
A".i
2:100
K(f:
(? 3!:I.'i'/9F>
t' Al...l'::l.Jl...l'1TI:::J(.!
MC)I...Y;E D1:::i"!I.JM
NT)
5
:CIC;N
03/J. r /{> 6
SW
1346 6()J 0
C",F-II._01:111,1):::
6 300
.1.
L.1.1
03/:?:I.!96
;alai
4:'.i()0--- i::l...
SI,JI...F'A'T.1:::
5340
:LO
'1C.:M
0:3/ ':L/96
f:iW
E:)46"'9O Z),3
1 AL.L. VALUES EXCEPT SOLIDS AND 'rSS ARI" ON A DRY WEIGHT BoSTS.
i RP A L WJ1 CC. 1"I. CI-ILJ Nthe
M N ONES
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made t
work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. Copyright 1977

AV& 4.E.ASTPERN.; ilkGTRICUL". '..)-tRAL imc.
7521 W,tiitEpine Rbad - Richmond,.Vitbinia-23237 (804) 743=9401
Fax No. (805)" 21-1-6446
fi462-306 ACCOUNT .15469 1=•fiii� ;i
REPO T�NUMBER
J•
l &:YQ- GRO SYSTEMS INC
1,2071' L.ANCASTER •HIGHWAY
HWY :521. SOUTH•
PINEVILLE MC 28134
LAP NUMBER = 41190-
SAMPLE IU - 1. OF 1
RESUL•I
PARAMETER
> OWfd OF T6YLORSVILLE
B1050LIDS ANALYSIS REPORT
DETECTION
a; c�lL 1 LIMT T
CMi;: iir i rMG/tiG) ANALYST
ROBENT 146MILTON
COPY TO ANNAPOLIS
DATE - AMP'Lt:G 03"14/96
DATE PECk IVED 03/ 18/` 6
LTA YE REPORTED 43i 21 /yl<,
ANALYSIS
DATE METHOD f�C1=cREMCF
SOLIDS
NITR0c;C.N t TKN)
.+
c�. %�i
9,t,b
)4ljQ•.r
it3hG0
t00
-�-
l Ci l:)G
•:•
l.ii
tip+ "
5 0G
PHOSPHORUS
I a 19
1.3YO0
100
PHC
POTASSIUM
0161
6100
I00
Llctq
0:3/1?/96
Ellei
31,r;.4
SULFUR
0.69
6900
100
TJcN
03/19iY6
Sid
B46-6010
CALCIUM
0,60
6000
100
t1CN
03.119/r 6
sw
846-6010
AO
MAGPlF_rTUM
S
0.27
27Q0
104
DCN
J3/19/9d
SW'
A46-60i0
E
1102
10200
100
PCC
03/19/96
SW
046•-6010
IRON
65:0
1
03/19/96
5W
--b0i
646 a
MANGANESE
DCI�!
03/19/96
SW
£i4—601
Ft
172
1
DCN
03/I9/96
SW
646-6010
ZINCCOPP
ZINC
346
1
UCN
03/19/96
SW
'94-6-6010
AHI[O�liA NNITROGENi
.,:3��
13547
100
DCN
03/19/96
5W
8�6-b010
NO:�-N€l2 NITROGEN
169
lb
L11IR
U3/19/96
EPA
350.2
I
1
LOR
03119/96
EPA
353.1
-HROM1Fi
�iL
R6
5
i►cm
03/19/96
'SW
946-6010
NICK
34
1icN
03/1.9/9d
SW
8A6--6010
LEAL:EL
LkAtt
17
a
UCN
021/19/96
Sw
04-6-6010
Li: M
r13/ 19/96
c-
rW
•046=•-610 10
it:t VALl!ES EXCEPT
•SOLIFIS AND TSS
ARE nN A 1IRY
WFI(:I-Ii• ZzACY4-'
i `_
H.
Ow repots and tefthis are for The exciusive a M coniidenti5! "W of aim clients, and may not be racxacWme in wWo of in IsaA, nor may arty ►ef e,enoe be mado fo T,w
Work. the results, oatne o«rpany in auq aduatisiny, r,aws retpace. or other pantie :•."'0u&% erue.Ms wnhnut obtainiN our for written Qutiw�izalion, . cc�rYr�eT ��n .. l
r

7621 :WhiteOirie'-Rdad •';i chaiono, V+rSin(a 23237 (804):743-9 .0
F$x:No-.(904)-27 =6446
PAGE..-
REPOAT NUMBER
ara ona - sYs'rEms -ING
1207-t'I.-ANCASTER 'MMAWAY
HWY:. • 52'1: SOUTH
PINEVILLE NC '20134
LAB NUMBER - 41190
SAMPLE TD - 1 OF I
RESULT
PARAMETER y y
TOWN OF TAYLORSVILLC
BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS kF.PORT
DETECTION
RESULT LIMIT
(MC/KG) ( MG/KO) -ANAL Y51'
ANALYSIS
D6TE
ROGER-C tfAMZI..'Cot4
COPY T01 ANNAPOL i a
PATE SAMPLED 03/ 14/ 96
DATE RECFI.4r.ED .4.3/f L4/96
DATE RKPORIEI= 03/21/96
METHOD REFERENCE
FcSEh'IC
EkCUf�Y
�:■.E31
0.4
VC'N
03/20/9b
5(J
9
i fi- /461
E"N I UM
0.39
1.. 16
0.1
0. i.
IICN
�
03/20/96
�'
sw
�I
� � 74 71
N (STANPAREt• UNITS)
7.20
D
2
ALCIUM CARBONATE EQ
0.71
7100
100
r'fi7
03/19/96
EPA
154.1
OLATILE SOLIDS
67.41
674100
100
KC+IS
i_DR
03/17/96
ASTM
Cb02
RGANIC NITROGEN
8.51
65100
100
KCS
03/19/96
sM
254OG
OL
Nii
s
03/19/96
CALCULATED
HLORIDEUM
6300
r1cN
03/19/96
GW
046-6010
ULFATE
ATE:
340
1
10
LItR
03/21/96
sm
4500-CL
JCM
03/21/96
SW
844-9030
L VALUES EXCEPT sOLYDS. ANL TSS ARE ON A DRY WEIGHT !)ASIS. � ��.'LtH.
' Lf/
Our roporls and kiters we to the exdrr�ive �r+d oorrhderrrra! use of ow c4w". and may rat be repmduc-ed inwttoie or in paL C • N 0 R MAN L)ON'E S
%"k, the resutls� or the oompww w arty adreAi9 v, mews reteasa, or c&cf put�lk: annouwernenty without obteiR'IrOr may any tteNererrCe be made to the •
n9 (wprwrWmen aulhonzalk CopyrVu Ig" l

Town of Tavlorsville Land Application
Attachment 4: Treatment/Stabilization Process
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

STABILIZATION METHOD
The Town of Taylorsville Wastewater Treatment Plant employs aerobic digestion.
PSRP could not be verified by the conventional treatment processes using time and
temperature. However recent data has shown that plants with long sludge age or no
primaries do have acceptable pathogen densities for land application. In order to show
this we have verified reduction in vector attractiveness and fecal analysis as outlined in
EPA./625/10-89/1006 Environmental Regulations and Technology, "Control of
Pathogens in Municipal Wastewater Sludge".
As shown on the attached lab data sheet we have verified that the digestor waste sludge
has less than 6 average log density necessary to comply with PSRP equivalency.
This attached sheet also verifies that the reduction of vector attractiveness through the
SOUR test. The digestor waste sludge has less than the 1 mg. oxygen/hour/g TSS
intake at 20 C required for PSRP equivalency.
At this time only one sample has been collected for this verification. We are in the
process of collecting additional samples and forwarding that data within the next three
weeks. In the meantime, we ask that you continue the review of this application and
we will forward the additional data shortly.
M
mist/Philbrook

Z0'3Jdd
6260 ZbS b02- 1
SZ:6t Z6, b gnu
e
•spTTosoTq aa� ..
spot ate TpsodsTp aoTad at:g. uaaq 9-eq buTTTT=puet puE spaq buTLaQ
•uoTgeoTTddp puej o4 paeomaa aq TTTM aagsabtp ate uzoa3 sabpnTs
pu-e queTci ate 7o p-eat; eq4 oq paAomaa as 'iTzM -ZagsabZp ate 4zoa.4
qu-oaQ • aags2bTp aug. o.:. *paeoucaa aae xaT9:zseTo atM tQoa9: sabpnTs
ags-eM (sagnuTm pC-SZ) aagme'Ra 4oe4uoo auTaOTRO at4 grbno�--qq
1 Ta.eez4 saagZM asatqL (buT1440s X-T2puoaas) saaTaT-reTo 157q-4 0'4
ua-gq pue uTseq uoTq-cave auo o-. MoTg: saagTTg: a5at:4 moil sTeT-m4lex
•saa4IT9 buTTxoTaZ Z a74 04UT paKsnTg
uau4 sT s-rgy •dn XOlaq uoTTeb 000T - 008 a a09 MGTTE ?z[M
sa-4 buTsop oqut pebzE-qosTp sT sxueq Z asstr4 moz-Z MOT-Z '4tmnT-J9:H
' sxLmq .73oqarI Z oguT PagngT-r4s?p K"ETenba
sT puE xoq zaggTTds E og.uT usaaos a*eq ai:rq qbnoaz� s-taAe-74 'auTT
TTE;--no uTem ate. -qbrnoag4 KgTTToe3 queTd ate szaatza aa4EMagstM

Biological & Chemical laboratories, Inc.
Post Office Box 40
Granite Falls, North Carolina 28630-0040
[phone]
stonier: Town of Taylorsville
Date/Tlme Collected:
6/17/92,
3:30pm
204 Main Avenue Drive, SE
Sample Collected by:
B. Eades
Taylorsville, NC 28681
Date/Time Received:
6/17/92,
5:45Dm
0:
N00026271
Date Reported:
C
6/26/92
AnalysIs Units
Influent Effluent
Upsireem
Downstream
BOM-Day mg/L
I1
1,2
COD mg/L
1
Fecal Coll. /100 rn!
1
T.S. Residue mg/L
1.2
Ammonla, N. . L, mg/L
1
Nitrogen, T. mg/L
_
1.Z
Phosphorus. T. mg/L
1
-PH SU's
i
Oxygen up a e i
Digester - 200C_
Waste Return - 200C
I
Imhoff T Ink - 200C
Init, ai 3._4
Initial 3.6
Iri t 'L. al 3.1
Ites
5 minutes 3.4
5 minutes 3.5
5 min 3.1
J _
10 minutes •4
3
10 minutes 3 ;
10 mi�utes 3.0
�
I
i'E: Date analyzed pe rs on laboratory worksheets since 'Preservatives:
lain anab/ses may 6 ,< dormed on different dates dueo 1. Coo! 4.0 C°
_hold time requlremer�ts. : , ' 2• pH 2.0 H2SO4
• l i 3. pH 2.0 HNO3
`.. ✓. `... •, Approved by: 4. pH y 12 NaOH
� � � -
LaFa tte A, Gragg, Lab Director 5. Zn Acetate + NaOH o pH ? 9

z X
X I
X
` 1 DRYING 1 REDS �L
H
1
/
_
I
�
H
JIUDGC DRYING
BEDS CIIIUCMT i
I
/+
LNT SIAIIGN
N•.S
Ne4
Nn J
I
Ne.2
N¢ I
Ne.6
LSV-2
/+
J/
/F O
DBV-1
----_—
.m
DBV-2 — DBV-3 e'—I-- DBV-4 OBV-5 —— §DBV-i k
---__— — —_ __ _—
p y-7 O V-B ADVe�I 0 V-9 — 4 v-10
/
Ne
FILTER I
- 4• \� 1 X
k
.}.T+
�'`(�� � D 7 1
11IMARY $LODGE
PUMPMO STATIDI/
/
�♦ ° e / Y \ e'_ /
�
PSV-I,PSV-2,PSV•3,
!
'a.
p♦ //
PSV-4,PSV-5 k
\
RPV-2
RECYCLE
I
•
V-1
PUNPIND
STATION
RPV-I, RPV-5
t,_12___,.•/
// ^ ,di t`°
•DI •cry �
r /// RPV-4 4..P,g-3 � FSp�••v scvu..._
OPERATIONS
a UILDING
/
fSPLITTER—
/
Boxr
®
—�SS__
--
-INFLUENT
K
I
SAM SCREEN
�. aw•Ns•n ►e.•p•• N Nr•w
SPv-2
/
N¢ I ♦ / / / ABV-2- �yf
DOSING
�' bOCL CHAMBER
Off' �♦\ // \\ .p�////
\ \
TRICKLING
FILTER N¢Z
I . _ __ r • --- f- r ' f I I
FIGU R
IOM e
¢ ¢
-CLARIFIER-
¢ eCV-3
(TYP)
NEW LINE
EXISTING LINE -----
WATER LINE _W_
_—W--
I ADV-9,ADV-9ADV•ID
2• 1DV-1,A.V•.9:AlV•II
7 ADV•5,ADV=G,ADV-7
I 4 ADY•5 AOV•6 ADV•7

Town of Tavlorsville Land Application Sites
Attachment 5: Operations Plan

A. INTRODUCTION
This Operations Plan contains detailed operational procedures
designed to comply with applicable regulations and guidelines.
Additional procedures and constraints have been incorporated
based on Bio Gro's previous land application experience with
the ultimate objective being a land application program that
safeguards public health, surface and groundwater supplies and
provides an agronomic benefit to the project area.
B. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Aerobically digested sludge and sludge from the Imhoff Tanks
generated at the Town of Taylorsville Wastewater Treatment
Plant will be land applied in a liquid form.
Sludge will be loaded at the wastewater treatment plants and
transported in tank trailers to permitted land application
- sites. Bio Gro Systems will land -apply the sludge on approved
sites in accordance with the operational procedures described
herein and at rates set in the permit.
C. LAND APPLICATION PROCEDURES
1.; `Sludge Removal, Transport, and Application
a. Sludge removal.
f Sludge will be removed from the Imhoff tanks or
aerobic digesters at the wastewater treatment plant
with a submersible pump.
The sludge will be pumped through a six-inch
flexible wall hose to a loading tower. The
flexible wall hose will be connected to rigid PVC
pipe at the loading tower. A remote control switch
will be located at the top of the loading tower to
control the power source to the pump in the holding
tank. The tractor/tank trailer units will pull
under the loading tower with the tank trailer being
filled trough a hatch located on top of the
trailer.
1
b. Sludge transport and method of land application.
Sludge will be transported from the treatment
plants in tractor/tank trailer units to
approved land application sites. The
transport trucks will deliver the sludge to a
high -flotation land application vehicle
J stationed on the field receiving sludge. The
sludge transfer will be through a suction.hose
t
.WU ". :L. -A . . .1 SI 11.1i ._t4a7,T sV7zf - .
.. ..cam

and the land application vehicle will perform
all sludge distribution.
Sludge distribution on the sites will be uniform
throughout the distribution area. To ensure
adequate control of the application rate for each
site, the equipment used for spreading the sludge
will be calibrated by measuring the amount handled
on a known square footage. While the rate of
discharge from the application vehicle is fixed,
the speed of the equipment can be adjusted to
maintain whatever flow rate is desired to achieve
specific application rates.
The mode of application will be subsurface
injection or surface application followed by
incorporation by discing. Injection and
incorporation will not occur on pasture and hay
fields or on cropped fields where the farmer has
adequate crop residue and wants to maintain a no -
till or minimum tillage system.
The method of application is selected based on the
crop that is being grown and the tillage practices
being employed by the farmer. Since ,farm operators
typically rotate different crops and tillage
practices in a specific field each year, it is not
possible to determine exactly what method of
operation will be used on each field at -this time.
Prior to each application, a representative meets
with the farm operator to determine what crop is
being planted and what tillage practice is being
employed for a particular field. If row crops are
being planted using conventional tillage methods,
the sludge will be injected. If the farmer is
planting the field using no -till practices or the
field is in pasture or hay, sludge will be surface
applied.
If there are any sites that have seasonal high
groundwater conditions that preclude incorporation,
the sites could be surface applied. However, a
better alternative would be to place seasonal
restrictions on the site and conduct operations
only during periods when seasonal highs would not
be encountered.
Equipment to be used on the project includes:
1. Two -to -three totally enclosed, watertight
tanker trucks of 6000-6500 gallon capacity.

2. One high -flotation land application vehicle of
2000-4000 gallon capacity.
Operations will be discontinued during periods of
inclement weather and will not be resumed until
sufficient drying of the fields has occurred.
The truck units will be inspected, licensed and
appropriately marked as required for the purpose of
transporting the sludge material.
C. Storage
Town of Taylorsville provides storage for the
sludge during non -application periods in the
existing digesters and Imhoff Tanks.
2. Site Operation
a. The sludge will either be injected or surface -
applied followed by incorporation through discing.
Discing and injection will not occur on pasture and
hay fields or on cropped fields where the farmer
has adequate crop residue and wants to maintain a
no -till or minimum tillage system.
b. The amount of sludge applied will.be limited to the
annual allowable dry tons per acre as required by
the permit for the site.
C. Buffer zones will be observed as follows:
1. Distance from traveled surface of roadway: 25
feet.
2. Distance from on -site residences of the
landowners receiving sludge: 100 feet for
surface or subsurface application.
3. Distance from any habitable residence or place
of public assembly under separate ownership or
which is to be sold: 200 feet injection or
surface application with same day
incorporation; 400 feet surface application
without incorporation. These distances may be
reduced to 100 feet with written permission of
the resident. The form used for obtaining
permission is included in Attachment 1.
4. Distance from any well with the exception of
an approved groundwater monitoring well or a
well that has been permanently abandoned in
accordance with state regulations: 100 feet.
r

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
A4
RJ
DEHNFi
N.C. DEPT. OP
September 24, 1996 ENVIROMIFNT, HEALTH,
6 NATURAL RESOURCES
SEP 90 1996
Mr. Charles Mashburn, County Administrator
County of Alexander DIVISION of EIIVI?OP►u1EIlTAL h',AIIAGEMENT
255 Liledoun Road MONESVItLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Taylorsville, North Carolina 28681
Subject: Permit Application No. WQ0006906
Town of Taylorsville
Land Application of Wastewater
Treatment Residual Solids
Alexander County
Dear Mr. Greer:
The Division of Environmental Management has received an application from Town of Taylorsville
for the land application of residual solids from the treatment of wastewater for two new sites in Alexander
County. This Division will ensure that all federal and state regulations are enforced.
If maps of the sites are needed, please contact Mr. Rex Gleason , Water Quality Supervisor, in the
Division's Mooresville Regional Office at 704/ 663-1699. Should you desire to comment on this
application as it relates to your interests, please do so no later than September 25, 1992.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. John Seymour at 919/ 733-5083 ext. 546.
Sincerely,
/ John Seym ur
�' Permits and Engineering Unit
cc: VN400resville Regional Supervisor
Alexander County Health Department
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

5. 100 feet between surface sludge application
area and waters classified as WSII, WSIII or B
and 100 feet between the application area and
the Mean High Water Level of waters classified
as SA or SB; 50 feet between subsurface sludge
injection area and waters classified as WSII,
WSIII or B; and 100 feet between the
application area and the Mean High Water Level
of waters classified as SA or SB.
6. 100 feet between any surface sludge
application area and any stream, lake or
river. 50 feet for subsurface injection.
7. Distance from groundwater lowering and surface
drainage ditches: 25 feet.
8. Distance from property lines: 100 feet unless
the adjoining property owner concurs with
sludge application closer to the property
line. The form for obtaining adjacent
landowner's permission to apply sludge up to
their property line is included as Attachment
2.
Buffer zones will be flagged or marked and no
- sludge will be applied within the buffer zones.
The most restrictive buffer will apply in combined
situations.
d. Provisions will be taken to prevent soil loss
through erosion. Provisions will include contour
application and avoidance of areas where surface
- drainage patterns result in concentrated flow of
runoff from rainfall.
e. Seasonally wet areas are of concern only during
very brief periods of the year with abnormally high
precipitation, usually during the months of
December through March. In the unlikely event that
such seasonal ponding does occur these areas will
be buffered by flagging. In addition, good
agronomic practice requires that areas which are
unseasonably wet and would produce rutting or
damage to the field should not be utilized for
sludge application or any other farming operation
during those periods.
f. The amount of sludge applied will not exceed the
hydraulic capacity of the soil at the time of each
application. In no case will it exceed 27,000
gal/acre (one acre inch) per day. If a subsequent
pass across a field is necessary to achieve the
desired application rate, sufficient drying time

' will be allowed between passes.
g. operations will be discontinued when soils are
saturated and will not be resumed until sufficient
drying of the field has occurred.
h. Sludge may be applied on frozen ground that has
crop residue sufficient to prevent surface runoff.
During such application, the maximum slope to which
sludge will be applied will be five percent.
i. A minimum of 36 inches of soil will be maintained
between the deepest point of sludge injection and
bedrock or the water table during the period of
application. <
- j. Sludge shall not be applied on areas exceeding 18
percent slope for injection or surface application
with incorporation and 10 percent for surface
application without incorporation.
k. Soil pH should be adjusted to 6.5 or greater prior
to application.
1. All grazing by animals whose products are consumed
by humans must be prevented for one month following
the last application event. This will be
accomplished by keeping animals fenced out for 30
days..
M. Public access to sites which have':lhad sludge
applied shall be controlled for a period of 18
months from the time of last sludge application.
Since private farmland is not generally accessible
to the public, this objective is usually
accomplished through normal practices.
n. Crops for direct human consumption with the
harvested edible portion in contact with the
sludge -amended soil shall not be planted for a
period of 18 months following the last application.
01

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Aftachment 6: Soil Scientist's Report
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Soil Scientist Report
,The sites contained in this package were evaluated by
examining existing USDA-SCS Soil Survey information, the soil
material exposed in a series of hand auger borings and by soil
sampling and testing. Other important items that were taken into
consideration were depth to bedrock and seasonal high water table.
Topography
Slope on these sites are typical of the area of the state.
The slopes range from nearly level to the maximum of approximately
3.0 percent. Topography will not limit injection but surface
application of biosolids may be restricted in some areas.
Soils
The soils information necessary to determine quitability for
the land' application of treated biosolids must address both
agronomic and engineering properties of the soil materials
encountered on the sites. These properties can be evaluated on a
preliminary basis by examining published literature .such as that
nnntained in Soil Survevs published through the Soil -Conservation
Service. In addil
confirm the soils
soils were evalua
sites with a hand
locations on the
represented in tt
evaluated with i.
properties includ
horizons and prey
bedrock within
addition, a serif
from the plow lay
capacity and pH
constituents. T)
are contained in
.ion, an actual site investigation is' necessary to
information contained in the soil survey. The
red by examining soil material extracted from the
auger. Hand auger borings were taken at selected
sites representative of the major soil types
e soil survey. The soil material extracted was
icreasing depth for selected properties. Those
a: depth, color, texture, presence of restrictive
once or absence of a seasonal high water table or
feet of the biosolids application zone. In
s of core samples were collected and composited
=_r on the sites to determine soil cation exchange
.o establish background levels for selected site
.e results of the auger borings and core samples
this submittal.

Application Rate Recommendations
The biosolids generated for this project have been tested and
verified as non -toxic, non -hazardous and suitable for application
onto agricultural land.
Based on the analyses nitrogen and zinc are the most limiting
factor to the annual application of these biosolids. At the
nitrogen application rate sufficient phosphorus is also applied.
The farm operator will need to apply potassium since the sludge is
low in this element. Phosphorus should be added if soil tests
indicate that the soil is low in this nutrient. Salt additions at
these application rates do not pose a problem. In general salts
are not a problem in humid and sub humid regions because there is
sufficient rainfall to leach them down through the soil profile and
away from the crop root zone.
The soil test results indicate that the cation exchange capacity of
the soils fall within the 4. 8 to q-..v meq/100gram range. Based on
this the most limiting metal in terms of cumulative loading is zinc
and. it would take approximately 39.9 years of annual applications
to reach this level based on the highest application rate of 3.2
dry tons/acre.
The hydraulic loading rate will be limited to 27,000
gallon/acre/day for liquid application. Sufficient drying time
will be -allowed between applications to prevent hydraulically over
loading the site.
Soil testing of the proposed sites indicates that the cation
exchange capacity of the topsoil material on the sites.is generally
in the low to medium category. Research conducted in recent years
has shown that soil chemical properties such as low cation exchange
capacity are not limiting factors when low metal biosolids are
applied at agronomic rates. Heavy metal recommendations contained
in this submittal reflect the lowest cations exchange capacity
category currently utilized to establish EPA loadings.
conclusion
The material proposed for application on these sites is an
excellent source of nutrients. Neither biosolids characteristics,
sites characteristics, nor soil characteristics should preclude use
of these sites in a land application program. With careful
operation and strict adherence to Federal and State regulations
these sites should be excellent sites for biosolids application.
Soil Scientist
Bio Gro Systems

Town of Tavlorsville Land Application Sites
........................
Key to Sod Boring Log
Symbols
= Not Encountered
Note: Soil borings were conducted on the following dates:
Borings 1 and 2: June, 1996
Boring 3: July 30, 1996
Soil boring locations are indicated on the site plan map.
I = Boring Number 1
2 = Boring Number 2
3 = Boring Number 4
Key to Site Plan Map
-.40,
Well Locations
Field Boundaries
aSoil Boring and Number
m�. Buffer Zone
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Field No.
Boring
No.
Depth (Inches)
Color
Texture
AI-4-1
1
0-6
brown 7.5 yr 514
sandy clay loam
10-48
dark brown 7.5 yr 4/4
clay
AI-4-3
2
0-6
brown 7.5 yr 5/4
sandy clay
10-48
dark brown 7.5 yr 4/4
clay
AI5-1
3
0-6
strong brown 7.5 yr 5/6
sandy clay loam
7-12
yellowish red 7.5 yr 5/8
clay
12-48
strong brown 7.5 yr 518
clay
..........
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

I
Sc��1
.Series::
BETHLEHEM
2.0 - 6.0
BUNCOMBE
RAPID >6.3
CECIL
0.6 - 2.0
f
CHEWACLA
0.63 - 2.0
F
DOGUE
2.0 - 6.0
PACOLET
2.0 - 6.0
RIVERVIEW
0.6 - 2.0
Percolation
Texture
cec
(ln/hr)
meg/10
2.0 - 6.0
SANDY LOAM
RAPID >6.3
LOAMY SAND
0.6 - 2.0
SANDY CLAY LOAM
0.6 - 2.0
LOAM
0.2 - 0.6
SANDY LOAM
0.6 - 2.0
SANDY CLAY LOAM
.6 - 2.0
FINE SANDY LOAM
0.06 - 0.10
LOW
>6.0
0.06 - 0.08
LOW
2
0.13 - 0.15
LOW
>6.0
0.13 - 0.15
LOW
0.5 - 1.5
(NOV.-APRIL
0.08 - 0.15
LOW
1.5 - 3.0
(JAN.-MAR.)
0.08 - 0.12
LOW
<6.0
.12 - 0
LOW
3' - 5'

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Attachment 7: Agronomist's Report
....:.............:::::....:........:......::::::::::................................:::::::::::..;;;:...............::.:::.::..::.:.:::.:;:.....:,.:,.;:.;,.;:.:::;::.;::.::.;::;<.::.:;.;.::.::.;:.:;:.::::.......::.::.::.:.:::.::.; .....:;:.::;.:.;::;.::;.;
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Agronomist Report
Several factors should be taken into consideration in
determining sites agricultural suitability to receive biosolids.
These factors are soils, crop rotations, loading rates and nutrient
requirements.
The crop types and cropping schedules are investigated prior
to a site being considered as a biosolids application site. The
sites in this submittal consist of row crop land (corn, soybeans,
small grains) with some permanent pasture and hay land.
Biosolids analysis information is reviewed to determine the
most limiting application rate factor. For this project nitrogen
is the most limiting factor. Due .to the low solids content of the
biosolids hydraulic loading limits may also limit application rates
in that more than one application pass may be needed to supply the
nitrogen requirement of the crop to be grown.
When applying to row crops, biosolids will be applied prior to
planting or after harvest (this would provide nutrients for the
next planting). Timing of application is important with permanent
pasture and hay crops. Biosolids should be applied .on these crops
after a.gr`azing period or hay cutting. If hydraulic loading limits
require that more than one pass be made on a field in order to
satisfy the nitrogen requirement of the crop being grown, the field
should be allowed to dry sufficiently prior to the next
application.
Soil testing of the sites included -in this application
indicates that soil pH 6.0-6.5 on most sites. The lime
recommendations are generally made based on raising the pH to a
standard of 6.5. The nutrient requirements are a direct function
of specific crop needs. Recommendations found in the University
System and Extension service publications for specific crops should
be used to determine nutrient requirements. Application rates are
-- based on the annual nitrogen requirements for each particular crop
being grown. This application rate will also supply sufficient
phosphorus for plant growth. In many instances such as with zinc,
sulphur, and copper essential micro -nutrients are also supplied to
the plant. The resulting trace metal loadings at nitrogen limited
rates are minimal. Because of the low levels of metal additions
there is no cause for concern with regard to concentration of
metals in plant tissues. Salt additions at these application rates
do not pose a problem. In general salts are not a problem in humid
and sub humid regions because there is sufficient rainfall to leach
them down through the soil profile and away from the crop root
zone.
1

The crops being grown on the site in this submittal are
primarily corn, soybeans,_ wheat, other small grains, permanent
pasture and hay. There are no restrictions on harvesting and
marketing any of these crops other than there shall be no animals
grazing on sludge applied fields for 30 days following application.
My review of the soils and crop rotations proposed for this
project find the submitted sites to be suitable for the land
application of sludge.
B eCR
Agronomist
`�Bio Gro Systems
o �ROBERT
CERrIF,ED HAA4/LroiVAUR
ee m
�og�
Q,o
�+yr� O 9
` "O �omt6 f49'�O�p
0
r

REPORT NUMBER A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES,'INC.
215-1086 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
SEND 'I0 GRO D IVIS IC
TO:
P S 388
P'INEVILLE, NC • 2 134- 03 3
DATE OF REPORT 08105196 PAGE 1
GROWER: ROBERT L MJARSHALL
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
A(CCT # 45469
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED ROBE T HAMILTON
BY: COPY T0: ANNAPOLISP MD
DATE RECEIVED 08101196
DATE OF ANALYSIS 08/02196
ORGANIC
PHOSPHORUS
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
$ODIUM °
, ° PH
Cation
at
PERCENT
LAB _
MATTER •
* **
HYDRO-
GEN
Exchange
Capacity
E SATURATION (COMPUTED)
BASE
P1
(Weak Bray,)
P2
',,(Strong Bray)
tig`
SOIL
BUF FER
-
NUMBER
NUMBER
ENR*..
*
H
%
RATE ° lbs. A
ppm-P RATE
ppm-PRATE
ppm-K RATE
m-M d',RAT.E
Pp 9
Pp m-Ca RATE'
n-Na RATE,
PP ..
PH,
pH
meq/100 g
meq/ 00 g
K
Mg
Ca
H
Na °
1_
C55 7,
6.3 140V
1 87 V H
. 240 = V
230 V
180 VH
c 20 R
5.7
�.
1 ■ �
�.
�` ■ �
$.1
2. �
1.1.
2
05C58
14p VIII.7
18�s` V�
190 VH9
850
5.8
: .9,
1.5
7.8
5.9
4.7
9.0
9^-8r.0
�
"a 6:Y 1r
lVH:24E�0''VJ
�L ! "Y F6
;.'! R,T = V
1 6v� '17
- +Y Y {i
gN
7� ')"7
■ •
.6.
.
9.0
■
q0■4
T s
1.1
■ 8
(SEE EXHLANA I IUN UN BA(;K)
SAMPLE
NUMBER
NITRATE
NO
PPm No3 N
RATE '
SULFUR° "
S
ppm-S RATE
., ZINC
Zn':
ppm-Zn RATE
MANGANESE
Mn ,
ppm-Mn RATE
IRON • °
Fe
PP m Fe RATE
COPPER
Cu _
PP m-Cd RATE
BORQN
B
PP m-B RATE
EXCESS
LIME
RATE '',-
SOLUBLE
SALTS
'
mmhos/cm RATE
CHLORIDE,
CI
P pm -GI RATE
MOLYB-
DENUM •
Mo,
ppm Mo
RATE
° PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
%
SAND
%
SILT
` %
CLAY
SOIL'"`
TEXTURE °
1
.11 :M
16. 4= Vie
28 H
90 V
1 6.0 V
1 0.
2
11 N
21. 3, Vii
29 h
74 V-
8. 2 V
u. 0.9 mt
3
11 M
22.7 VP
3<3• H
81 V
413.1 V
1 0.8
This repo plies to the sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
maxim thirty days after testing. Soil Analysis prepared by:
A &/ETER GRICULTURAL L ORATORI , INC.
NOR JONF
by
I v nM I IN : V ❑M LVVV (VL), LVVV (L), IVItuIUM (IVI), MUM (H), vtHY HIUH kVH), HNU NVNt (N). ---- MULI II LY I HI_ FItSUL 16 IN ppm BY 4.6 TO CONVERT TO LBS. PER ACRE P205 v
ENR - ESTIMATED NITROGEN RELEASE ""' MULTIPLY THE RESULTS IN ppm BY 2.4 TO CONVERT TO LBS. PER ACRE K20

% ORGANIC MATTER AND ESTIMATED NITROGEN RELEASE (ENR)
The Organic Patter content is determined chemically on the dried screened soil sample,
I"{o:vever, the total organic content may he somewhat higher than reported because larger pieces of
plant and adimal residues are screened out prior to analysis. Only a pat of the total nitrogen in the
organic matter of a soil will become available for plant use during the growing season. Many factors
such as: soil moisture, soil temperature. the soil's physical condition, and the amount and type of crop
residues present all have an, effect on bacterial action. Therefore the ENR value is only a guide to the
nitrogen supply available for the growing crop. For additional information on nitrogen release and
recommenri'ati n guides, see pages 5-12 in our boots "Sou and Plant Analysis."
Results:The results for the major and minor plant food elements are reported in parts per million (ppm)
on an elemental basis.
Conversions: To c:on vert to ibs'A, the type of soil and tillage depth should be considered. iftst mineral
soils weigh approximately2million pounds (dry weight' for anacre ofsuit 6bito7 nchesdeep.Anacre
of soil 10 inches deep weighs approximately 3 million pounds. in the past, most laboratories that
reported results inib-E. per acre were considering 2 million ios. of sail per acre (resul',s in pprn x 2
lbs. per e cre). However, with deeper tillage practices used today many growers are dealing with nearly
3 million lbs .of soil per acre,
:�I#IS1V��'IL+1'�ft't
Results
in ppm
2 Million lbs.
."of soil per acre
61,4-7 in. deep
Results-
in ppm
3 Million lbs.
of soil per acre
in 9-10 in. deep
-P x 2 =
lbs, per acre of P
P x 3
bs. per acre of P
x 4.6
Ica. per acre of P.O.
x 6.9 =
lbs. per acre of P20s
K x 2 =
lbs. per acre of K
K x 3 =
bs' per acre of K
_
x 2.4 =
lbs. per acre of K O
x 3.6
'
lbs; per acre of K20
Mg x 2 =
bs. per acre of iv g
(• g x 3 _
lbs. per acre of Mg
Ca x 2
tbs. per acre of Ca
Ca x 3 =
tbs. per acre of Ca
S x 2 =.
lbs, per acre of S
S x 3
lbs. per acre of S
S x 6 =
Ica. per acre of SO4
S x 9 =
• ibs.. per acre of SOa
B. Zn, iJn,
6, Zrr, Mn,
Fe, Go, Mc
Fe, Cu, Mo
x 2 -
tbs. per acre of 3,
x 3 -
lbs, per acre of B•
Zn, Mn, Fe, Cu, We
Zn, Mn, Fe, Co. Me
PHOSPHORUS
Two different tests are made and reported for availability of phosphorus in the sot; sample,
Weak Bray (Pt)-Thismethod determines the amount of readily available phosphorus
in the soil, A level of at leas; 20 ppm of P is desired for average crop production and a
level of 3o ppm of P is desired for top y.eWs of most crops,
Strong Bray (P.)-This method determines the artourtof readily availablephospffcrus
plus a part of the active reserve phosphorus in the soil. A 'anal of at least 40 ppm of P
and preferably 60 ppm of'P or more is desired for good yields of most crops.
SODIUM BICARBONATE (P) - This method determines tno amount of readily available
phosphorus in calcareous soils (baying free lime present). A level Diet least 10 ppm of
P and preferably 15 ppm of P or more is desired for good yields of most crops. For
additional information+, of phosphorus availability and recommendation guides, see
pages 13-21 in our book, "Sol: and Plant Analysls.'
CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (CEC)
The cation exchange capacity (C.E.C.) is a measure of the capacity of a soil to hold exchangeable
cations. These include Hydrogen (H+), Calcium (Ca++), Magnesium (Mg++), Potassium (K-,) and
Sodlunt (Na-:)-
C.E.C. is measured in terms of ,niliiequ;valents (ineq.) per 100 grams of soil. it depends largely on
the amount and type of clay present acid the organic matter content. The larger this valise, the more
cations the sell is able to hold against leaching. '
PERCENT BASE SATURATION
The balance for the soil colloid recommended by mast soil scientists is 65 to 75 percent calcium,
10 to 15. Percent magnesium, and from 2 to 5 percent potassium..
The percent base saturation is calculated trout the C.E.C. and percent saturation of Ca, Mg, K, H,
and Na is reported to assist you in determining thebalance of cations in your soil. For additional
Information and recommendation guide, see pages 25-29 in our book; "Soil and Plant Analysis:'
pH
Soil pH: The soil pH is measured on a 1:1 soil to water solution. The soil pH measures the active
soil acidity to alkalinity. Mineral soits should have a pH of 6.0 to 7.0 for most crops, while a pH range
of 5.0 to 5.5 is adequate for high orgartcsails.
Buffer Index: The buffer fill is determined with the Shoemaker, McLean, and Pratt (SMP) buffer
solution. The lime requirerreni is:determined by the depression m the buffer pH by acidity in the sot:
sample. The arnount if ii_mestone reededto neutraiiza the acidity present lags already been Bete mined
and the following table is a general guide; but variations from Diller published guides may occur due
to differences in limestone fineness, neutralizing value, and plow deptl
SALT pH:
In areas ,where the SMP buffer is not used, a salt pH is determined. The salt pH of in soils is
measured by adding 0.01 molar calcium chloride to the soil's solution. Soils which are highly leached
and sandy soils may have a salt pH value as much as one whole unit lower than the soil pH, (i,e. 6.0-
5.0). The soil p i value of soils of average salt content may be lowered from 0.4 to 0.6 units by casing
the calcium chloride. Depressions of the soil pH amounting to 0.1 units and lass upon the addition of
calcium chloride occurs whon soils are exceedingly high in their content of salts. For additional
Information or, soil pH arid liming guide, see pages 30-33 in our book, "Soil and Plant Analysis."
LIME REQUIREMENT
- TonsiAcre Limestone
Mineral.Soils :
Organic Soils
Buffer Plow Depth Plow €Depth, Plow Depth Plow Depth
: pH 6i•a inches = 9 inches 6„ inches
9 inches
7A none' none
0
0
6.9 none none
0
0
•i6.8 1 1.5
0
0
56.7 1,5 2
0
0
- 6.6 2 3
4:30
0
6.5 2.5 4
0
0
6A 3 4,5
1
1,5
6.3 3.5 5
2
3
_
c 6.2 a 4 6
2:5
3.5
&1 4,5 7
3
4,5
6,0 5.5 8
4
6
_
5.9 6 9
4.5
6.5
_
. 5.8 •• 6.5 10
5
T5
5.7 7 11
5.5
8
5.6 8 12
6
9
5.5 9 13
6.5
10
lithe soil pH is above 6.5, no buffer index will be determined since lime would not be needed for most
crops. Cropsuaised on organic soils (sails containing 20 or more organic matter) usually do
not benefit
from liming unless the soil pH is less than 5.3.
ADJUSTMENTS FOR TYPE OF LIMING MATERIAL
Two primary factors affect the actual amount of a given liming material required to achieve
the
desirable effect on soil pH. The total Nutrilizing Power (TNP, also referred
to as Calcium Carbonate
Equivalent) and the fineness of the timing material are these factors. The
following table will serve as
a gklde to miake these adjustments.
Ag Ag
A9 Ag
Ag
Super- Pulverized Ag
Fine Course
Granulate
Hydrated fine Base Ground
Meal Meal
Slag
Lbs. to equal
1 ton of 1-restone_ 11 GO 1900 2000 2300
2900 3400
2700
TNP 140-160 90+ 90+ 9tj+
90- 90+
90+
F
f P
N A 100 MESH f 00 8o 60% 40
30 20
5
E S 60 MESH 100 95 70! 50
40 30
15
N S 20 MESH 100 100 95°1 .70
60 50
50
E ,I
S N
S G
- If ,the TNP is less than 90, multiply amount from above by
these percen es:
TNP
80-89
115
70-79
130
- , 60-69
150
LIMING:
Apply lime only after the soil has been tested. Too much lime can be as harmful as too little.
Lime must be thoroughly mixed with the soil for maximum effectiveness.
If -both magnesium and calcium are needed, apply dolomite lime to help supply magnesium.
EXCESS LIME:
A visual rating of free lime present. Soils having high amounts of free lime available will have
associated problems in the availability of major and. minor elements and difference In choice or amount
of soil amendments.
SOLUBLE SALTS:
For infor;nation, refer to page 61 of our book, "Soil and Plan, Analysis."
SULFUR:
All crops need sulfur. The higher the nitrogen uptake by a crop, the greater the need for sulfur, A level
of 15,20 ppmbf available sulfur should be maintained for most crops. For additional information on
availability of sulfur and milking recommendations: see pages 22-24 in our book, "Soil and Plant Analysis."
MICRONUTRIENTS
The available levels of micronutrients are rated from very love to ve y high. However, applying the
recommended amount of a certain minor element with a low`�ating will not necessarily insure a crop
response because of the many factors which may influence micronutrlent response. Some of the factors
whli;h influence response are: rapidly changing soil pH; excessive applications of N-P-K, sot: physical
problems, soil moisture extremes, excessive leaching, crop variety, and plantpopulation. For additional
information on why plants need micron6trients, their avallabi ity, interactions with other nutrients and a
recommendation guide, see pages 34-45 in our book, "Soil and. Plant Analysis.'
M
"Our records and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may
any reference be made to the work, the results or the company in any.advertising; news release, or other public announcements without
obtaining our prior written authorization,' Copyright 1977

REPORT NUMBER:
R215-036
ADDITION
RN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Dine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
SEND
TO: 1= T n (_RO DIVISION
PINF1 11_1_..F_ VIC ;'81'34-f_i388
DATE OF REPORT (_)e, f r ? 7 r' i' PAGE 1
SAMPLES
GROWER: RC)L-;r_R'r L. i`lrf)RSH()LI_ SUBMITTED
BY:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
0
COPY 'TO:
DATA. RECEIVED VED ;:?i/i_? L .'�-c>
D(1TE OF if) NALYSI'3
SAMPLE
(DENT.
LAB
NO.
Nitrogen
N
mg/kg
Phos-
phorus
P
mg/kg
Potassium
K
mg/kg
Sulfur
S
mg/kg
Calcium
Ca
mg/kg
Magnesium
Mg
mg/kg
Sodium
Na
mg/kg
Iron
Fe
mg/kg
Aluminum
Al
mg/kg
Manganese
Mn
mg/kg
Copper
Cu
m09
Zinc
Zn
mg/kg
Ammonia
Nitrogen
mg/kg
Nitrate
Nitrogen
mg/kg
J
P-01 !L 9
LAB
Cadmium Chromium
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Total
NO.
Cd Cr
Ni
Pb
As
Hg
Se
Nitrogen
pH
C.E.C.
i'1O
mg/kg mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
(meg/100g)
2055.7
1
r'?6
6
12
3. 33
0. 1 S
O. 29
,
20558
1
26
7
19
3.47
0. 14
0.34
5
20559
1
57
12
21
4.04
C). 13
0.5C)
5
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made This report applies only to the sample(s) tested. Samples are
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. retained a maximLLT, of t", .14y6i,after te,%ing:;l=-IS
A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.

1
REPORT NUMBER A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
H215-087 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone] -At
ACC"T # 45469
SAMPLES
SEND its . SRO DIVISION DON L D PAYN - ALS SUBMITTED ROSER't HAMILTO
TO: GROWER: BY: COPY ' T0: ANNs4P�E LISs MD
FOB 388
INEVILLE . NC 28134-038
DATE RECEIVES 08601��
DATE OF REPORT # � PAGE SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT BATE OF ANALYSIS 08 /02196
°
ORGANIC
",PHOSPHORUS
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
'CALCIUM
CI` .
"SODIUM
PH
Cation
° 'PERCENT
SAMPLE
LAB
MATTER
� �
P1
(Weak Bray)
P2 :
(Strom Bray)
K
M 9"
Ca
Na
SOIL'
"•
BUFFER
Hy DRO-
GEN
Exc hange
Ca aci y
P
BASE SATURATION (COMPUTED)
NUMBER
NUMBER
a�° , . ENA
° ._+ ,,«..
k
.....
y*t
."
H
C.E.C.
f
M
o�
RATE: Ibs./A
Ppm-P RATE
., ppm-P"RATE °
ppm K RATE
"ppm-Mg RATE
ATE
PPm CaR
ppm Na RATE'
pH
pH " °
meq/1 OOg
"meq/1 OOg
' K
9
Ca
H,
Na
1
20560
9.8.14OV
154 VW24
0
230 V
320 VH
200 H
6.3
6.8'
1.1
10.3
5.7
25.8
2
20561,8.2
140V
1 44 V H
:1 6 4 Vil
300 V
330 VH
990 M
6.4
6.9
0.81
8.8
8.7
31.2
51.1
. H. 9
3
0562.7.
3 140V
. 60 V H
, 88, V`
24C, V
' 310 VH
G00 N
6.8
0.2
8.4
7.3
30.6
59.21.
: 2. 9
4
056 3
,, 4.5 13211
1 00 W'H
-111 , V
14C V'S
150 VH
` 5 0 M
5.8
6. `
1.11.
5.6
6.4
22.4
52.1119.0
5
056
.3.4 111H
139 Vm-:160
vv
12C V11
140 VH
550 R
6.1
6.9,
0.7
4.9
6.3
23.8
56.2
3..7
(SEE EXPLANATION ON BACK)
n-'
NITRATE
SULS UR
ZINC
MANGANE$ E
° IRON
IRON
•
COPPER
BORON
EXC ESS '
. 50LUBLE '
CHLORIDE
MOLYB-:
DENUM
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
,
AMPLE
Mn
Cu
B ;
LIME "
SALTS.
CI
Mo .
�NUMBER
m-No N,
PP a-
. ,
RATE
ppm-Mo
'/.
%
%o
SOIL
"
RATE
p m S RATE
p .
PP m-Zn RATE,
-Mnm•Mn RATE
P.pPm-Fe
RATE
ppm-Cu RATE
.B RATE :
a mmhos%m RATE
PP m-CI RATE,
RATE
SAND
SILT .CLAY
TEXTURE
1 -
11 ' M
20. 6 VE
149 H
55 Vi
9.+6 V.
.°1.2 M
2
11H16.7VH
33 H
4 6 H
3.6 V4
1.6M
3
11 -M
10.1 VH
32 H
15 H
4.2 V
C 1.1
This report appli to the samples) tested. Samples are retained a
4
1 i
_
5. 3 H
aC
19 H
4.9 V.
0<.7 N1
maximum oft ' days after testing. Soil Analysis prepared by:
A A ER RICULTURAL L ORATOR S, INC.
5
11.4
5. H
.18. M
. 20 H
6..5 V
410.7
by
r �vvv tv�), �vvv tt.), IVICuIVIVI kivl), Whin tn), VCnT Mum kvm), ANu IVUNC tIV). --'- NIULI IHLY I Ht HCJUL I IN ppm CY 4.b IU UUNVtH I I LtiS. VEX AUHt 1-2 5 v �
ENR - ESTIMATED NITROGEN RELEASE ""' MULTIPLY THE RESULTS IN ppm BY 2.4 TO CONVERT TO LBS. PER ACRE K20

EXPLANATION OF SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
% ORGANIC MATTER AND ESTIMATED NITROGEN RELEASE (ENR)
The % Organic Matter content is determined chemically cn the dried screened soil sample.
However, the total organic content may be sornawhat h. her than reported because larger pieces of
plant and animal residues are screened out prior to analysis. Only a part of the total nitrogen in the
organic matter of a soil will become available for plant use during the growing season. Many factors
such as: soft fnoisture, sail temperature. the soil's physical condition, and the arr,ount and. ype of crop
residues present al' have an effect on bacterial action. Therefore the ENR value is only a guide to the
nitrogen supp;y available for the growing crop. For additional information on r tregon ra:ease and
recommendation guides, see pages 5-12 in our boot; "Sri[ and Plant Analysis.'
Results:Theresultsforthemajorand minor plantfoodelements are reported npartsperx iiNon(ppnt)
on an elemental basis.
Conversions: T6 convert to lbs/A, the type of soil and tillage depth should be considered. Most mineral
soils weigh approximately 2 million pounds (dry weigh) for an acre of soi. 61�4 to i inches deep, An arse
of soil 10 inches deep woighs approximately 3 million pounds. In the past, most laboratories that
reported results in lbs. per acre were considering 2 million ibs. of soil per acre (results in pprt x 2
lbs. per acre). However, with deeper tillage practices used today many ,rowers are dealing with nearly
3 miilion,bs. of soil per acre.
CONVERSION TABLE
Results
n ppm
2 Mfl;on Ids.
of soil per acre
6, 7 in. deep
Hesults
in Porn
3 Million lbs.
of soil per acre
n 9-10 in. d2op
P x 2 =
lbs. per acre of P
P x 3
'bs. per acre'of P
x 4.6 =.
lbs. per acre of P205
x &9 =.
ibs, per acre of P20s
K x 2
lbs. per acre of K
K x 3 -
bs. per acre of K
x 2.41 =
ibs, per acre of KZO
x 3.6
us. per acre of Kr0
Mg x 2 =
lbs. per acre of Mig
Mg x 3
bs. per acre a-' Pig
Ca x 2 =
lbs. per acre of Ca
Ca x 3
ibs, per acre of Ca
S x 2 -
los, per acre of S
S x 3 -
'bs. per acre of S
S x 6 =
lbs. per acre of SO4
S x 9 -
bs. per acre of SO4
B, Zn, Mn,
B. Zn. I - An,
Fc, Cu. Palo
Fe, Cu, Me
x 2 =
tbs. per acre of B,
....
x 3 -
lbs. per acre-o`' B,
Zn. Mn, Fe, Cu, Me
Zn, Nlm Fe, Cu. Mo
PHOSPHORUS
Two different tests are made and reported for availability of phosphorus in the soil sample.
Weak Bray (P)-This method determines the amount of readily available phosphorus
in the soil, A level of at ieast 20 ppm of P is desired for average crop production and a
level of 30 ppm of P is desired for top yields of most crops.
Strong Bray (P2) -This method determines the amount of readily available phosp' on;s
plus a part of the active reserve phosphorus in the soil. A'evel of at least e.o ppm of P
and preferably 60 ppm of P or more is desired for good yields of most crops.
SODIUM BICARBONATE (P) -This method determines theamountof readily available
phosphorus in calcareous soils (having free Ime present), A level of at least 10 ppm of
P and preferably 15 ppm of P or more is desired for good yields of most crops. For -
additional information of. phosphorus ava!!ability and recommendation guides, see
pages 13-21 in our book, "Sol: and Plant Analysis."
CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (CEC) : The cation exchange capacity (C.E.C.) is a measure of the capacity of a soil to hold exchangeable
cations. These include Hydrogen (H+), Ca'c:um (Ca ++); Magnesium (Mg+i-), Potassium 1K-r) and
Sodium (Na.). -
C.E.C. is measured in terms of milliequivalents €tneq,) per i 00 grams of soil. !t depends largely on
the amount and type pf day present and the organic matter content. The larger this vei:ue, thl more
cations the soi' is able to he'd against leaching.
PERCENT BASE SATURATION
The balance for the soil co€':old recorrinnended by [nest soil sic enlis€s is 65 to 75 percent calcium.
10 to 15 percent magnesium, and from 2 to 5 percent potassium.
The percent base saturation is calculated front the C,E,C. and percent smuraton of Ca, Mg, K, H,
and Na is reported to assist you in determining the balance of cations in your soil. For additional
information and recommendation guide, see pages 25-29 in our book. "Sol: and Plant Analysis.'
3L
Soil PH: The soil pH is measured on a'1:1 soil to water solution. The soil pH measures the aceive
soil acidity to:a'kalinity: Mineral sells should have a pH of 6.0 to 7.0 for most crops, while a pH range
of 5.0 to 5.5 is adequate for high organic soils.
Buffer Index: The buffer pH is determined with the Shoemaker, McLean, and Pratt (SMPi buffer
solution. The lime re,uiremant is.determined by the depression of the buffer pH by acidity in the coil
sample, The a mount if limestone needed to neutralize the acidity present has already been determined
and the following table is a general guide; but variations from other published guides may occur due
to differences in limestone fineness, neutralizing value, and p€ow depth.
SALT pit:
In areas w*ere the SMP buffer is not used, a salt pH is determined. Tile salt pH of th sof's-is
measured by adding 0 01 molar calcium chloride to the soil`s soiu ion So is which are highly leaded
LIME REQUIREMENT
Buffer
pH
Tons Acre Limestone
Mineral Soils -'
Flow Depth Plow Depth
6 11 inches 9 inches
0manic Soils
Plov Depth Plmv Depth
u%s inches 9 inches
-- TO
nos
none
0
of
6.9
none
none
0
0
2
.0
0
_ 6.6
2
3
0
6.5
2.5
4
0
0
6A
3
4,5
1
1.5
.6.3
3.5
5
2
3
„ _6.2 .,
4
6 .. _
2.5
3.5
.. 6.1
4.5
_ 7
3
4.5
6.0
5.5
8 -•
4
6
5.9
6
9
6.5
5.8
5.5
10
5v
T5
__ 5.7
3
5.5
8
5.61
H
?2
6
9
5.5
9
..,
6.5
10
If the soil pH is above
6.5, no buffer index
vviil be determined since
lime would not be, nestled for most
crops. Crops raised or;
organic soils (soils
containing 20% or more organic matter)
usually do not benefit
frorn liming un':.ess the
soil pH is less than
5.3.
ADJUSTMENTS FOR TYPE OF LRAING MATERIAL
Two primary factors affect the actual amount of a c,?van liming material required to achieve the
desirable effect on soil pK The iota! Nutrlizing Power (TNP, also referred to as Ca:cirnr Carbonate
Equivalent) and the fineness of the imina material are ti;ese factors. The fcl owing table will se..,ve as
a gull -a to make these adj.ustrnerl
Ag
Ag
Ag
Ag
Ag
Super-
Pulverized
Ag
Fins
Course
Granulate
Hydrated
fine
Base
Ground
;Neal
Meal
Slag
Lbs.
to equal
? ton
of Lim estone
1100
1900
2000
2300
2900
3400
2700
TNP
140-160
90+
90+
90+
90-r
90+
90+
F
I
N
A 00 MESH
'00
80
60%
40
30
20
5
E
S 60MESH
1;00
95
70!
50
40
30
35
N
S 20 MESH
? 00
1.00
95 %c
70
60
50
50
E
I
S
N
S
G
if the TNP
is less than 90, multiply
amount from
above by
these percentages:
TNP
80-89
115
70-79
130
60-69
150
Apply lime only after the soil has been tested. Too much lime can be as harmful as too little.
Lime mustbe thoroughly mixed with the soil for maximum effectiveness.
If both magnesium and calcium are needed, apply dolomite lime to help suppy magnesium.
EXCESS LIME:
A visuat rating of free lire present. Soils having high amounts of free lime available will have
associated problems in the availability of major and manor elements and difference in choice cr amount
of soil amend,rents.
SOLUBLE SALTS
For information: refer to page 61 of our book, "Soil and Plant Analysis."
SULFUR:
All crops need sulfur. Tile higher the nitrogen uptake by a crop, the greater the need for sulfur. A level
of 15-20 ppm of available sulfur should be maintained for most crops. For additionat information on
availability of sulfur and making recommendations. see pages 22-2? in our book. "Selland Plant Analysis."
MICRONUTRIENTS
The available levels of micionutnents are rated from very low to very high. However, applying the
recormnended amount of a certain minor element with a tow rating will not necessarily insure a crop
respor se because of he many factors which`. may influence micronurrient response. Some of the factors
which influence response are: rapidly changing soil pH, excessive applications of N-P K, soilphysical
problems, soil moisture extremes, excess!: e leaching, crop variety. pod part population. For additional
nformation on why plants need micienutrients, their ava?lab i`y; interactions :vith other nutrients and a
eco ime, dation guide, see pages 34.45 in our book. "Soil and Plant Analysis."
and sandy soils may have a sat:' pH value as much as one r hole unit lower than the soil pH. (Le, 6.0-
5.0). The soil PH value of soils of average salt content may be lowered from 0.4 to 0.6 units by using
I! re calcium chloride. Depressions of the soil pH amounting to 0.1 units and less upon the addinen of
calcium chloride occurs v;hen soils are exceedingly high :if their content of sails. For additional
information or'.soil pH and timing guide, see pages 30-33 n our cook, 'Soli and Plant Analysis."
"Our records and letters are for tite exclusive and confidential use of our clients and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may
any reference be made to the work, the results or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without
obtaining our prior written authorization." Copyright 1977
0

i
REPORT NUMBER A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R215 -087 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone] Met
SEND SIC GRO DIVISION
TO:
POE 388
PINEVILLE NC . 28134-0388
DATE OF REPORT 08105/96 PAGE 2-
GROWER: iiONALD PAYNE - AL5
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
ACCT # 45469
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED ROBERT HAMILTON
BY: COPY TO:. ANNAfPOLISr MD
RECEIVED 08/01I96
DATE OF ANALYSIS 08/02196
ORGANIC
PHOSPHORUS
POTASSIUM.
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
pH
Cation
PERCENT
SAMPLE
LAB
MATTER*
HYDRO-
Exchange
BASE SATURATION (COMPUTED)
Pi
K
M
Ca
Na
SOIL
BUFFER
NUMBER
;NUMBER9
o
{ Weak Bra y)
(Strong?Bray)
M
x
w
GEN
H '
Capacity
C.E.C.
o
�O'
0
/o
0
/
0
H
0
/o
% , ENR
RATE lbs./A'
*+
m,P RATE
pp -
....
pP m-P RATE
ppm-K RAT E
ppm-Mg
ppm-Ca
ppm-Na RATE'
pH
pH
rneq/100g
meq/100g.
K
Mg
Ca
H
Na
b
2056 5
: 3.3.1091q
130 VH-145',Vf
11 C Vil
120 VH
540 M
5.9
6.9
0.8
+.8
5.9
0.8
56.2
7.1
7
20566.3.1
105M
142 VH
I E 9 VE
100 H
120 VH
520 M
5.9
6. 9 ,
0.8
4.7
5.5
21.5
55.9
7.1
t
0567.6■
0. 140V
60 VH
W-0
18C V
210 - Vfl
780 M
6.0
6.8 �
1.1
7.2
6.4
4.2
54.0
5.4
9
20568
. 6.1 140V
` 69 V H
. 78 VH
191D V11
220 VH
800 M
5.9
6.8
1.3
7.6
6.4
24.0
2.4
7.1
10
20569.4.7
1.34H
dig V H
, 77'VV
17C VDI
200 VH
730 bM
5.7
6.8
1.5
7.3
6.0
22.9
0.1
1.1
(SEE EXPLANATION ON BACK)
SAMPLE
NUMBER
NITRATE
NO3
m•N3' N
PP a
RATE.
SULFUR
S
ppm..-S RATE
ZINC
Zn
PP m-Zn RATE
MANGANESE
Mn
ppm-Mn RATE
IRON
Fe
ppm-Fe RATE
COPPER
Cu
ppm-Cu RATE
BORON
B
ppm-B RATE
EXCESS
LIME
RATE
SOLUBLE
SALTS
mmhos/cm RATE
CHLORIDE
CI
ppm-CI RATE
pp
MOLYB-
DENUM
Mo.
Pp m M o-
RATE
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
.
SAND
AND
IL
SILT
CLAY
SOIL
TEXTURE .'
6
11 'M
5. 5 H
17 P1
18 H
5.7 V
:0.7 M
7
11 ,M
6. 7 H
1S IN
22
7.2 V4,046
M
8
11 ,M
- 9. 7 VH
3S H
21 ,H
3.0 f$
... 0.8 M
Thisae sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
9
11 NM
8. 6 Vti
37 H
22 H
2.8 H
, 0.9 M
maxiter testing. Soil Analysis prepared by:
ICULTURAL LA ATORI , INC.
1 0
11
7. 61
.2 5, Hl
18 W
2.1 : H
1.1
b
CODE TO RATING: VERY LOW (VL), LOW (L), MEDIUM (M), HIGH (H), VERY HIGH (VH), AND NONE (N). -"' MULTIPLY THE RESULTS IN ppm BY 4.6 TO CONVERT TO LBS. PER ACRE P205 // '
ENR - ESTIMATED NITROGEN RELEASE ""' MULTIPLY THE RESULTS IN ppm BY 2.4 TO CONVERT TO LBS. PER ACRE K20 11

EXPLANATION OF SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
ORGANIC MATTER AND ESTIMATED NITROGEN RELEASE (ENR) "
The % Organic Matter content is determined chemically on the dried screened soil sample-.
However, the total crganic content may be somewhat higher than reported because larger nieces of
plant and anima: residues are screened out prior to analysis. Only a part of the total nitrogen in the
organic m3ner.6f a soil will become available for plant use during the growing season. Many factors
such as: sail moisture, soil temperature. the soil's physical eordition, and the amount and type of crop
residues presonl al': have an effect on bacteral action. Therefore the ENR value is only a guide to the
nitrogen supply available for the growing crop. For additional information on nitrogen.release and
recommendation guides, see pages 5-12 it our book "Sell and Plant Analysis."
Results: The rresultsforthe major and minor plant food elements a-ereported in parts per million (ppm)
or. an elerner tan basis.
Conversions: To convert to Ibs; A, tite type of soil and tillage depth should be considered. Most mineral
soils weigh approxirro rely 2 miliion pounds (dry weight) for an acre of soil 61%. to 7 inches deep, An acre
of soil i0 inches deep weighs approximately 3 million pounds. In tite past, most laboratories that
reported results in lbs. per acre were considerng 2 million lbs. of soil per acre (results in pprn x2 .r
Its. per a ro). However, with deeper tillage practices used today many growers are dealing with nearly
3 million lbs. of soil por acre.
CONVERSION TABLE
2 Million lbs.
3 Million Ibs.
Results
of soil per acre
Results
of soil per acre
in Dpm
6'h-7 in. deep
in porn
in 9-10 in. deep
P x 2 =
lbs, per acre of P
P x 3
Ibs. per acre"of P
x 4.6 =
lbs. per acre of P20s
x 6.9
lbs. per acre of P 05
K x 2 =
ins. per acre of K
K k 3 =
Ibs. per acre of K
x 2.4 =
Ibs, per acre of K,O
x 3.6 =
lbs. per acre a Kz0
Mg x 2
lbs. per acre of Mg
Mg x 3
lbs. per acre of Mg
Ca x 2 =
los, per acre of Ca
Ca x 3 =
bs. per acre of Ca
S x 2 =
lbs, per acre of S
S x 3 =
lbs. per acre of S
S x 6 =
Ibs, per acre of SO4
S x 9 =
lbs. per acre cf SO4
B, Zn, Mir,
B, Zn, Mn,
Fe, Go, Me
Fe, Cu, trio
x 2 =
loos. per acre of B,
x 3 =
ihs. per acre of B,
Zn, Mn. Fe, Cu, Me
Zn, Mn, Fe, Cu. Me
PHOSPHORUS
Two different tests are made and reported for availability of phosphorus in the loll sample.
Weak Bray (Pr) -This method determines the amount of readily available phosphorus
in the soil. A revel of at least 20 ppm of P is desired for averace crop production and a
level of 30 ppm of P is desired for top yields of most crops.
Strong Bray (P2) - This method determines the amount of readily available phosphorus
plus a part of the active reserve phosphorus in the soil- A level of at least 40 ppm of P
and preferably 60 pom of P or more is desired for good yields of most crops.
SODIUMBICARBONATE (P)Thsmethoddeterminesmeamountofreadilyavailable
phosphorus in calcareous soils (having free lime present}. A level of at least 'to ppm of
P and pretarabiy 15 ppm of P or more is desired for good yields of most crops. For
additional information of phosphorus availability and recommendation guides, see
pages 13-21 in our book. 'Soil and Plant Analysis.'
CATION EXCHANGE.CAPACITY (CEC)
The cation exchange capacity (C.E.C.) is a measure of the capacity of a soil to hold exchangeable
cations. These include Hydrogen (H+), Calcium (Cat_i), Magnesium (Mg 4-.), Potassium (K+) and
Sodium (No ),
C.E.C. is measured in terms of mi8iequivalents (meq.) per 100 grams of soil. It depends largely on
the amount and type of clay present and the crganic matter content. The larger this valrie, the more
cations the soil is able to hold against leaching.
PERCENT BASE SATURATION
The balance for ;fie soil colloid recommended by most soil scientists is 65 to 75 percent calcium,
10 to 15 percent magnesium, and front 2 to 5 percent potassium.
The percent base saturation is calculated from the C.E.C. and percent saturation of Ca, Mg, K, H,
and No is reported to assist you in determining the balance of cations in your soil. For additional
information and recommendation guide, see pages 25-29 in our book, "Soil and Plant Analysis."
pH
Soil pH: -1lie soil pH is measured on a 1:1 soil to water solution.'! he soil pH measures the aciive
soil acidity to atka?i.nify Mineral soils should have_a pH of 6.0 to 7.0 for most crops, while a pH range
of 5.0 to 5.5 is adequate for high organic sails.
LIME REQUIREMENT
Buffer
-pH
Tons/Acre Limestone
Mineral Soils
Picvr Depth Plow Depth
61,,,inches 9inches
Organic Soils
Plow Depth Plow Depth
6%,inches_ 9incnes
7.0
noina
none
0
0
6.9
none
none
0
0
6.8
1
1.5
0
0
- e6.7
1.5
2 - •
..0
0
6.6
2
3
0
0
6.5
2.5
4
0
0
6.4
3
4.5
1
1.5
6.3
3.5
-_ 5 -
2
3
- 6.2
4
6
2.5
3.5
6,1
4.5
7
3
4.5
6.0
5,5
8
4
6
5.9
6
9
<=.5
6.5
5.8
6.5
i 0
5
7.5
5.6
8
12
6
9
5.5
9
13
6.5
10
little soil pH is above 6.5, no buffer index will be determined since lime would not be needed for most
crops. Crops -raised on organic soils (soils containing 201% or more organic matter) usually do not benefit
from liming unless the soil pf i is less than 5.3.
ADJUSTMENTS FOR TYPE OF LIMING MATERIAL
Two primary factors affect the actual amount of a given liming material required to achieve the
desirable effect on soil pH. The total Nutrilizing Power (TNP, also referred to as Calcium Carbonate
Equivalent) and tine tinenesss of the liming material are those factors. The following table will serve as
a gyide to make these adiustrrents.
Ag
Ag
Ag
Aa
Ag
Super-
Pulverized
Ag
Fine
Course
Granulate
Hydrated
fine
Base
Ground
Meal
Meal
Slag
Lbs.to equal
1 ton of Limestone
1100
1900
2000
2300
2900
3400
2700
TNP
140-i60
90+
90+
90+
90+
90+
90+
F %
P
I
N A 100 MESH
100
80
60%
40
30
20
5
E S 60 MESH
100
95
704%
50.
40
30
15
N S 20 MESH
100
100
95%
70
60
50
50
E [
S N
S G
If the TNP
is less than 90, multiply
amount from
above by
:hose percentages
TNP
80-69
i 15
70-79
130
60-69
150
LIMING:
Apply lime only after the sail has been tested. Too much lime can be as harmful as toe little.
Lime musrbe thoroughly mixed with the soil for maximum effectiveness.
If both magnesium and caiciarn are needed, apply dolomite lime to help supply magnesium.
EXCESS LIME:
A visual rating of 'free lime present. Soils having high amounts of free lime available will have
associated problems in tine availability of major and minor elements and difference in choice or amount
of soil amendments.
SOLUBLE SALTS:
For information, refer to page 61 of our book, "Soil and Plant Analysis."
SULFUR:
All crops need sulfur. Tl1e higher the nitrogen uptake by a crop, the greater the need for sulfur. A level
of 15-20 ppm of evailabie sulfur should be maintained for most crops. For additional information, on
availability of su [fur and making recommendations, seepages 22-24 in our book, "Soil and Plant Ana.sis."
Buffer Index: The buffer pH is determined with tite Shoemaker, McLean„ and Pratt (SMP) buffer MICRONUTRIENTS
solution. The lime requirement is detenmined by the depression of €ne buffer pH by acidity in tire soil
sample. The amountlflimestoneneeded toneutralizetheacidity po senthasalreadybeendetermined Tte available levels of micronuirierts'are rated from very low to very high. However, applying the
and the following table is a general guide, but variations from other published guides may occur due recommended amount of a certain minor element with a low rating will net necessarily insure a crop
to differences in limestone, fineness. reuiralizing value, and plow dept;y. esDonsts because of the many factors which may influence micronutrient response. Some of the factors
whiE'n influence response are: rapidly changing soil pH, excessive applications of N-P-K, so!. physical
SALT pH: problems, soil moisture extremes, excessive leaching, crop variety. and plant population. For additional
information on why plants need rnicronurients, their availability, interactions with other nutrients and a
In areas where the SMP buffer is not used. a salt pH is determined. The Bait pH bf in soils is recommendation guide, see pages 34-45 in our bock. "Soil and Plant Analysis."
measured by adding 0.01 molar calcium chloride to the sail's sciution. Sans which are highly leached
and sandy soils may have a salt pH valise as much as one whc'e unit louder than the soil pH, ti,e. 6.0-
5.0). The soil pH value of soils of average salt content may be lowered horn 0.4 to 0.6 units by using - ..
the calcium chloride. Depressions of the son' pH arriounting to 0.1 traits and less upon the addition of
calcium chloride occurs when soils are exceedingly high in their content of salts. For additional
information on soil p!-1 and liming guide, see pages 30-33 in our book, "Soil and Plant Analysis:'
"Our records and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may
any reference be made to the work, the results or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without
obtaining our prior written authorization." Copyright 1977

REPORT NUMBER A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R215 °-087 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone] MOMLA
SEND EIO GRO DIVISION
TO:
PDB.388
PINEVILLE NC 28134-0388
DATE OF REPORT 08105I 96 PAGE 3
€ ONALD PAYNE ' AL5
GROWER:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT .
ACCT # 45469
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED ROSERT HAMILTON
BY: COPY TO: ANNAPDLISo MD
DATE' RECEIVED 08101 /96.
DATE OF ANALYSIS 08102/96
ORGANIC
PHOSPHORUS
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
pH
Cation
PERCENT
SAMPLE
LAB
MATTER
HYDRO-
Exchange
BASE SATURATION (COMPUTED)
Pi
PS
K
Mg
Ca
Na
SOIL
BUFFER
NUMBER,
NUMBER
' *`
(.Weak Bray)
(Strong Bray)
»
»
.:
»
GEN
H
Capacity
C.E.C.
°
o
1 ENR
RATE lbs./A
...
ppm-P RATE
.»»»
ppm-P RATE .
.»»».
ppm-K RATE-
»..
ppm-Mg RATE
ppm-Ca RATE
*.»
ppm-Na RATE
pH'
pH
meq/1 OOg
meq/100g
K
Mg
Ca
H
Na
11
2057 0
: 7. 0 140V
_ 71 V H
, 90 VH
170 VA
220 VH
820 M
6.0
16..8
1.2
7.5
5.8
4.4
54.5
5.4
12
0571
,, 6.0 140VO
60 V H
. 73 VE
16C V11
210 VH
750 L
5.6
- 6.8-
1.8
7.7
5.3
2.7 :
48.7
23.3
13
20572;-4.3.128H
49 V'H
- 55 H
14C V
' 170 VH
650 M
6.0
. 6.8
-0.9
5.9
6.0
23.3
54.7 -
5.4
14
057 3
_- 4.5 132V21
61 V H
_ 83 V
14C V11
160 VH
620 M
5.9
. 6. 8
1.0.
L5.8
6.2
Z3.1
53.6
7.1
15
20744
4.1 124H
'; 68 V Irk
76 0
14C V11
150 VH
620 M
5.9
6.8
1..0
5.7
.6.3
22.0
4.5 ,
7.1
(SEE EXPLANATION ON BACK)
SAMPLE,
NUMBER
NITRATE
, NIN033TE
3 -N
RATE
SULFUR
$ S
ppm-S RATE
ZINC
Zn..
ppm-Zn RATE
MANGANESE
Mn
ppm-Mn RATE
IRON
Fe
ppm-Fe RATE
COPPER
Cu
ppm-Cu RATE
BORON
B
ppm-B RATE
EXCESS
LIME
RATE
SOLUBLE
SALTS
mmhoslcm RATE
CHLORIDE
Cl
ppm-CI RATE
MOLYB-
DENUM
Mo ".
ppm-Mo
RATE
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
%
SAND
%
SILT
%
CLAY
SOIL
TEXTURE
11
11:4
8.9.VH
°3e H
23 H-
2.8 H
.0.9 M
12
11,N
:"7,6 H
:27 H
17 H
1..9 H
0.8 fq
13
11 .M
4.1 H
I N
12 H
1.4 H
,0.7 'M
This report ies to the sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
14
4
i 1 14
5. 0 H
�I
i 7 ML
1 4 H
y
!• 5 H
07M
maximum irty da s after testing. Soil Analysis prepared by:
& L E TER GRICULTURAL BORATORI S, INC.
15
11 P+�
.4. 8 H
It
15 H
1.5 H.
0.7 M
C. NoA j _
by
CODE TO RATING: VERY LOW (VL), LOW (L), MEDIUM (M), HIGH (H), VERY HIGH (VH), AND NONE (N). -"-- MULTIPLY T HE RESULTS IN ppm BY 4.6 TO CONVERT TO LBS. PER ACRE P205 / / ✓
ENR - ESTIMATED NITROGEN RELEASE ""' MULTIPLY THE RESULTS IN ppm BY 2.4 TO CONVERT TO LBS. PER ACRE K20 U

EXPLANATION OF SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
% ORGANIC MATTER AND ESTIMATED NITROGEN RELEASE (ENR)
The Organic Matter content is determined chemically on the dried screened soil sample.
However, the total organic content may be somewhat higher than reported 'because larger pieces of
plant and aninfi l residues are screened out prier to analysis. Only a part of the total nitrogen in the
organic matter o` a soil wi l become available for plant use during the growing season. Many actors
such as: soft moisture, soil temperature, the soil's physical condition, and the amount and type of crop
residues present all have an effect on bacterial action. Therefore the ENR value is only a guide to the
nitrogen supply available for the growing crop. For additional information on nitrogen release and
recommendaliongu`des, see pages 5-12 in our beef; "Soil and Plant Analysis."
Results: The results for the major and minor plant food elements are reported in parts per million (ppm)
on an elemental basis.
Conversions: Tocortvert to lbs/A. the type of soil and til!ace depth shculd be considered. Most mineral
soils weigh approximately 2 million pounds (dry,,veight) for an acre of soil 6' i to 7Inches deep. An acre
of soil 10 inches deep weighs approximately 3 million: pounds. Ir, the past, most laboratories that
reported results in tbs. per acre. were considering 2 million tbs. of soil per acre (results, ir. ppm x 2 s
lbs. per acre). However, with deeper tillage practices used today many growers are dealing with nearly
3 million ins. of soil per acre.
CONVERSION. TABLE
2 {:4i➢ion lbs.
3 Mi'fion lbs.
Results
of soil per acre
Results
of soil per acre
in ppm
61%'2-7 in. deep
in ppm
in 9-10 in. deep
P x 2 =
lbs. per acre of P
P x 3 --
'ins. per arse of P "
x 4.6 =
lbs. per acre of P205
x 6.9 =
lbs. per acre ct P205 _
K x 2 =
lbs. per acre of K
K x 3 =
lbs. per acre cf K
x 2.4 =
lbs. per acre of K20
x 3.6 =
lbs. per acre of K20
Mg x 2 =
inns, per acre of Mg
Mg x 3 =
lbs. per acre of I'Ag
Ca x 2 =
lbs, per acre of Ca
Ca x 3 =
lbs. per acre of Ca
S x 2 =
los. per acre of S
S x 3 =
lbs, per acre of S
S x 6 =
lbs. per acre of SO,
S x 9 =
lbs. per acre of SO4
B, Zn, Mn,
B. Zn. Mr.,
Fe. Cu, Mo
Fe, Go, Me
x 2 -
lbs. per acre of B,
x 3 -
lbs. per acre -of B,
Zn. Mn. Fe. Go, Mc
Zn, A4n. Fe, Go, Me
PHOSPHORUS
Two different tests are made and reporled for availability of phosphorus in the soil sample.
Weak Bray (Pt) -This method determines the amount of readily available phosphorus
in the soil. A level of at !east 20 ppm of P is desired for average crop production and a
level of 30 ppm of P is desired for top yields of most crops.
Strong Bray(P,)- This method determines the amountot readily available phosphorus
plus a part of the active reserve phosphorus in the soil. A level of at least 40 ppm of P
and preferably 60 ppm of P or more is desired for good yields of most crops.
SODIUM BICARBONATE (P) - This method determines tF.e amount of readily available
phosphorus in calcareous soils (having free lime present). A level of at least 10 ppm of
P and preferably 15 ppm of P or more is desired for good yields of most crops.. For _
additional information of; phosphorus availability and recommendation guides, see
pages 13-21 in our book. "Soli and Plant Analysis."
CATION EXCHANGE. CAPACITY (CEC)
The cation exchange capacity (C,E.C.) is a measure of the capacity of a soil to hold exchangeable
cations. These include Hydrogen (H+), Calcium (Caa-+), Magnesium (Mg+i-), Potassium (K-) and
Sodium (Nat).
C.E.C. is measured in terms of milliequivalents (meq.) per 100 grams of soil. Itdepends largely or:
the amount and type of clay present and the organic matter content. The larger this value, the more
cations the soil is able to hold against leaching.
PERCENT BASE SATURATION
The balance for the soil colloid recommended by most soil scientists is 65 to 75 percent calcium.
10 to 15 percent magnesium, and from 2 to 5 percent potassium.
The percent base saturation is calculated from the C.E.C. and percent safutabon of Ca, hag, K, H,
and Na is reported to assist you in determining the balance of cations in your soil. For additional
information and recommendation guide, see pages 25-29 in our book,'Soil and Plant Analysis."
MIL
Soft pH:'rhe soil pH is measured on a +.:I soil to :eater solution. The soil pH measures the active
soil acidity to alkali^try. Mineral,soils should have a pH of 6.0 to 7.0 for most crops, whi'e a pH range
of 5.0 to 5.5 is adequate for high organ'csoils.
Buffer Index: The buffer pH is determined with the Shoemaker, f.1cl-ean, and Pratt (SMP) buffer
solution. The lime requirement is determined by the depression al, the buffer pH by acidity In ilia soil
sample. The amount if limestone needed to neutralize the acidity present has already been determined
and the following table is a general guide; but variations from other published guides may occur due
to differences in limestone fineness; neutralizing value, and plow depth.
SALT pH:
LIME REQUIREMENT
Buffer
pH
Tons.'Acrs Limestone
Mineral Sails
Plow Depth Plow Depth
6Y- inches - - 9 inches
,
-
Organic Soils
Plow Dept, Ploy Depth
6%5 inches 9 inches
TO
none
none
0
0
6.9
none
none
0
0
6'.8
1
i .5
0
0
6.7
f,5
2
0
0
6.6
2
3
0
0
6.5
2.5
0
0
6A
3
- _ 4.5
1
1.5
(5.3
3.5
5
2
3
..6.2 •
4
_ - 6
2.5
3.5
6.1
4.5
7
3
4.5
6.0
5.5
8
4
6
5.9
6
9
't.5
6.5
5.8
6.5
_
10
5
7.5
5.7
7
15.5
a
5.6
8
12
6
9
5.5
9
13
6.5
to
If the soil pH is above 5.5, no buffer index wit{ be determined since lime wculd not be needed for most
• crops. Crops raised on organic soils (soils containing 20%or more organic matter) usually do not benefit
from fiming unless the soil pH is less than. 5.3.
ADJUSTMENTS FOR TYPE OF LIMING MATERIAL
TWO primary factors affect the actual amount of a given liming material required to achieve the
desirable effect on soi: pH. The total Nutrilizing Power (TNP, also referred to as Calcium Carbonate
Equi alent) and the fineness of the liming materiai are these factors. The following table will serve as
a guide to make these adjustments.
Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag
Super- Pulverized Ag Fine Course Granulate
Hydrated fine Base Ground Meal Meal Slag
Lbs. to equal
1 ton of Limestone 1100 1900 2000 2300 2900 3400 2700
TNP 140-160 90+ 90+ 90+ 90, 90+ 90+
F
I P
N A 100 MESH 100 80 601,•0 40 30 20 5
E S 60 MESH 100 95 70% 50 40 30 15
N S 20 MESH 100 100 95% 70 60 5o 50
E I
S N
S G
If the TNP is less than 90. multiply amount from above by these percentages:
TNP
80-89 115
70-79 130
60-69 i50
LIMING:
Apply lime only after the soil has been tested. Too much lime can be as harmful as too tittle.
Lirhe mustbe thoroughly mixed with the soil for maximum effectiveness.
If both magnesium and calcium are needed, apply dolomite Lme to help supply magnesium.
EXCESS LIME:
A visual rating of free lime present. Soils having high amounts of free lime available will have
associated problems in the availability of major and minor elements and difference in choice or amount
of soil amendments.
SOLUBLE SALTS:
For information, refer to page 61 of our book, `Soil and Plant Analysis."
SULFUR:
All crops need sulfur. The higher the nitrogen uptake by a crop, the greater the need for sulfur. A level
of 15-20 ppm of available sulfur should be mairts'ned for most crops. For additional information on
availability of so [fur and making recommendations: seepages 22-24 in our book. "Soil and Plant Analysis."
MiCRONUTRIENTS
The available levels of micronutrionts are rated from very low to very high. However, applying the
recommended arnount of a certain minor element with a low rating will not necessarily insure a crop
esponse because of the many factors which may influence micronutrient response. Some of the factors
which influence response are: rapidly changing soil pH, excessive applications of N-P-K, soil physical
problems, soil moisture extremes, excessive leaching, crop variety, and plant population. For additional
information on why plants reed micronutrienis, their availability, interactions with other nutrients and a
In areas ,.-here the SMP buffer is not used. a salt pH is determined. The salt pH of th soils is recommendation guide. see pages 34-45 in our book. `Soil and Plait Analvsls.'
measured by adding 0.01 metal, calcium chloride to the soil's solution. Soils which are highly leached
and sandy soils may have a salt pH value as much as one whole unit lower than the soil pH. (i.e. 6.0-
5.0). The soil pH value of soils of average salt content may be lowered from 0.4 to 0.6 units by using
the calcium chloride. Depressions of the soi: pH amounting to 0.1 units and less upon the addition of
calcium chloride occurs when soils are exceedingly high .n their content of salts. For additional
information on soil pit and liming guide, see pages 30.33 In our book, 'Soil and Plant Analysis."
"Our records and 4etters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients and may not be reproduced In whole or in part, nor may
any reference be made to the work, the results or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without
obtaining our prior written authorization." Copyright 1977
13

w �
REPORT NUMBER
R215-087
A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone] LAI,
Fax No. [phone]re t
SEND BIO GRO DIVISION
TO:
POO 338
ILL.-2�134-0338
DATE OF REPORT 0 105/ 96 PAGE 4
DOA LD PAYNE - AL5
GROWER:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
A CCT 45469
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED ROBERT . HJAMILTON
BY: COPY T0: ANNAPOLISr -ND
DATE RECEIVED 08/DI/96
DATE OF ANALYSIS 08102/96
ORGANIC
PHOSPHORUS
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM -
" pH1.
„
Catiori
PERCENT
SAMPLE
LAB
%MATTER**
HYDRO-
GEN
Exchan a
Capacity
P Y
B SATURATION
TIO U
N BASE SATU (COMPUTED) `
P1
(Weak Bray)
P2
,(Strop Bray)
K
M' g
Ca °
,.
Na
SOIL
BUFFER
°
NUMBER
NUMBER
ENR
«:.
.._
:.
H
C.EC:
o
%
/o
%
%
RATE lbs. A
ppm P RATE ,
ppm-P RATE
ppm-K RATE",,
ppm-Mg' RATE
ppm-Ca RATE
ppm-Na RATE"
pH
pH„
' meq/100g
meq/100g
K
Mg
Ca
H
Na
16
0� 75=:,4.4
130V!
82 VH
42 V
1�40 V
150 V�H
590
6.0
6.9
0'
5.4
�i.�
3.
4m7
5.4
17
057 6
: 4. ► 132V
1 O6 V H
_ 127 .01
15C Vill
150 ' VfH
610, M
6.1
6.9
0.7
5.4
7.1
23.0
56S2
13. 7
(SEE EXPLANATION ON BACK)
SAMPLE
NUMBER
NITRATE
No
ppm•Nc N
SULFUR
S
pp m S RATE
ZINC .°
Zn
m Zn ..
°
PP
MANGANESE
Mn '
ppm-Mn RATE •
° IRON ,"
Fe
, ppm-fe' RATE
COPPER ,
Cu
ppm•Cu RATEgy,
BORON
B
:'
ppm•&RATE�g
EXCESS
LIME '
RATE
• .
SOLUBLE
SALTS
mmhos/cm RATE
CHLORIDE
Cl,
Pp m-CI RATE �
MOCYB-
DENUM
Ma
pPm-Mo
RATE
P,ARTICAL SIZE -ANALYSIS
% .'
SAND
%
SILT
S
%
CLAY
SOIL °
' [ 'TEXTURE ,
,
y
gp.
�yRAT�,Eg
,q� }py
17
1.6
This report plies to the sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
makimu thin a after testing. Soil Analysi red by:
A & L STE BICULTURAL L ORATOR[ S, INC.
C. NORMA
by
V VUc I V RA I NU: VERY LUVV (VL), LUVV (L), MtUIUM (M), HIUH (H), VERY H1UH (VH), ANU NONE (N). .... MULI IDLY I HE HLbULIS IN ppm BY 4.6 1 U CONVERT TO LBS. PER ACRE P205 // 1
ENR - ESTIMATED NITROGEN RELEASE MULTIPLY THE RESULTS IN ppm BY 2.4 TO CONVERT TO LBS. PER ACRE K20 V \

EXPLANATION OF SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
% ORGASMIC MATTER AND ESTIMATED NITROGEN RELEASE (ENR)
The % Organic Matter content is determined chemically on the dried screened soil sample.
However, the total orga nic ccrtent may be samewhat higher than reported because larger pieces of
plant and anlroa. residues are screened olA prior to analysis. Only a part of the total nitrogen in the
organic matter of a soil will become available for plantuse during the growing season. Many factors
such as: sail moisture, soil temperature. the soil's physical condition, and the amount and type of crop
residues prese6i at'have an effect on bacterial action. Therefore the ENR value is only a guide to the
nitrogen supply available for the growing crop. For additional information on nitrogen release and
recommendation guides, see pages 5-12 in our boot; "Soil and Plant Analysis."
Results: The results for the major and minor plant food elements are reported in parts per million ;ppm)
on an elemental.basis.
Conversions: To co. fVert"to Ibs.'A, the type of soil and tillage depth should be considered. Most mineral
soils weigh approximately 2 million pounds (dry weight; for an acre of Sail 6 k to 7 inches deep. An acre
of soil 10 inches deep weighs approximately 3 million pounds. In the past, most laboratories that
reported results in lbs. Per acre were considering 2 million lbs. of soil per acre (results in pprn x 2 e
lbs. per acre). However, with deeper tillage practices used today many growers are dealing with nearly
3 millionrlbs. of soil per acre.
CONVERSION TABLE
2 Million lbs. 3 irli`llon lbs.
Results of soil per acre Results of soil per acre
n opm 61. 7 in. deep in ppm in 9-10 in. deep
P x 2 tbs. per acre of P P x 3 - lbs, per acre of P
x 4.6 lbs. per acre of Pao- x 6.9 bs: per acre of P..OS
K x 2 Ibs,
per acre or K K x 3 lbs. per acre of K'
x 2A .= Ins'
per acre of K 0 x 3.6 _ lbs. per acre of K20
Mg x 2 lbs. per acre of Ntg Mg x 3 - lbs. per acre df Mg
Ca x 2 = 'Ibs. per acre of Ca Ca x 3 lbs. per acre of Ca
S x 2 lbs. per acre of S S x 3 _ lbs. per acre of S
S x 6 lbs. per acre of 304 S x 9 . = ibs. per acre of SO4
B. Zn, Mn, B. Zn. Mn,
Fe, Cu, Me Fe, Cu, Mo
x 2 = tbs. per acre of B, x 3 - ds. per acre of B,
Zn, Mn, Fe, Cu, Me Zn, Mr. Fe. Cu. Me
PHOSPHORUS
Two different tests are made and reported for availability of phosphorus in tfre soil sample.
Weak Bray (P1)-This method determines the amount of readily available phosphorus
in the sail. A level of at least 20 ppm of P is desired for average crop production and a
level of 30 ppm of P is desired for top yields of most crops.
Strong Bray(P2)- This methoddeterrt nestheanpuntofreadilyavailable phosphorus
plus a par of the active reserve phosphorus in the soil. A level of at least 40 ppin of P
and preferably 60 ppm of P or more is desired for good yields of most crops.
SODIUM BICARBONATE (P)-This method determines the amount of readily available
phosphorus in calcareous soils (having free lime present). A level of at least 10 pprn of
P and preferably 15 ppm of P or more is desired for good yields of most crops. For
additional information of phosphorus availability and recommendation guides, see
pages 13.21 in our book, 'Soland Plant Analysis.'
CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (CEG)
T he cation exchange capacity (C.E.C.) is a measure of the capacity of a soli to hold exchangeable
cations. These include Hydrogen (H+), Calcium (Ca;-; }; Magnesium (fv1g+-r), Potassium (K.) and
Sodium (Na-).
C.E.G. is measured in terms of mill€equivalents (meq.) per 10C grams ofsoii. It depends largely on
the amount and type o' clay present and the organic matter content. The larger this value; the more
cations the soil is able to hold against leaching.
PERCENT BASE SATURATION
The balance for the soil colloid recommended by most soil scientistsis 65 to 75 percent calcium,
10 to 15 percent magnesium, and from 2 to 5 percent potassium.
The percent base saturation is calculated from the C.E.C. and percent sauralon of Ca, Mg, K, H,
and Na is reported to assist you in determining the balance of cations i- your soil. For additional
Information and recommendation guide, see pages 25-29 in our book, "Soil and Plant Analysis.'
pH
Soil pH: The soil pH is measured on a 1:1 soil-towater solution. The soil pH measures the active
soil acidity to a kalirfty. Mineral soils &.cold havea pH of 6.0 to 7.0 for most crops, :while a pH range
of 5.0 to 5.5 is adequate for high organic soils.
Buffer Index: The buffer pH is determined will the Shoemaker, McLean, and Pratt (SMP) buffer
solution. The line requirement is determined by the depression o:` the buffer pH by acidity in the soil
sample. The amount if limestone needed to neutralize the acidity present has already been determined
and the following table js a general guide; but variations from other published guides may occur due
to differences in limestone fineness, neutralizing value, and plow depth.
SALT pH
In areas whore the SMP buffer is tot used, a salt pH is determined. The salt pH of th soils is
reasured by aiding 0.01 molar calcium chloride to the soil's solution, Soils which are highly leached
and sandy soils may have a salt pH value as much as one who's unit lower than the sal pH. ;i.e. 6.0.
5.0). The soil pH value of soils of average salt content may be lowered from 0.4 to 0.6 units by using
the calcium chloride. Depressions of the soil pH amounting to 0.1 units and less upon the addition of
calcium: chloride occurs :when soils are excead'ngiy high in their content of sails. For additional
information on soil DH and liming gufu'e, see pages 30-33 to our book, "Soil and Plant Analysis."
LIME REQUIREMENT
Buffer
pH
7.0
6.9
• 6.8
r6.7 s
6.6
6.5
6A
. 6.2
6.1
6.0
5.9
5.6
5.5
Tons;Acre Limestone
Mineral Soils -
Plow Depth Plow Depth
651s inches - :9 inches
Organic Soils '
Plow Depth Plow Depth
6%1 inches 9 inches
none
none
none
none
0
0
1 -
1.5
0
0
1.5
2
•O:
0
2
a 3
c0'
0
2.5
4
0
0
3
4.5
1
1.5
3.5
Y 5
2
3
4
6
2.5
3.5
4.5
7
3
4.5
5.5
- 8
4
6
6
9
4.5
6.5
6:5
to
5
7.5
1 i
5.5
8
8
12
6
9
9
13
6.5
10
little soil pH is above 6.5, no buffer index will be determined since 'line would not be needed for most
crops. Cropsmised on organic soils (soils containing 20 % or more organic matter) usually do not benefit
from liming unless the soil pH 1s less than 5.3.
ADJUSTMENTS FOR TYPE OF LIMING MATERIAL
9
Two primary factors affect the actual amount of a given iming_material required to achieve the
desirable effect on soil pH. The total Nutrilizing Power (TNP, also referred to as Calcium Carbonate
Equivalent) and the fineness of the liming material are these factors. The following tab':e will serve as
a ggiid'e to make these adjustments.
Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag
Super- Pulverized Ag Fne Course Granulate
Hydrated fine Base Ground Meal Mea Stag
Lbs. to equal
1 ton of Limestone '1100 1900 2000 2300 2900 3400 2700
TNP 140-160 90+ 90+ 90> 90: 90+ 90+
F %
I P
N A 100 MESH 100' 80 6046 40 30 20 5
E S 60 MESH 100 95 70% 56 40 30 15
N S 20,fAESH 100 100 95% 70 60 50 50
E 1-,
S N
S G
If the TNP is less than 90, multiply amount from above by these percentages:
TNP
80-89 1115
70.79 130
60-69 150
LINING: _-
Apply lime only after the soil has been tested. Too much � lime can be as harmful as too tittle.
i:irne must be thoroughly mixed with the soil for maximum effectiveness,
If both magnesium and calcium are needed, apply dolomite lime to help supply magnesium.
EXCESS LIME:
A visual rating of free lime present. Soils haying high amounts of free lime available will have
associated problems in the availability of major and minor elements and difference in choice or amount
of soil amendments.
SOLUBLE SALTS:
For information, rater to page 61 of our book, "Soif and Plant Anafysls
SULFUR:
All crops reed sulfur. The higher the nitrogen uptake by a crop, the greater the need for sulfur. A level
of 15:20 ppm of available sulfur should be maintained for most crops. For additional information on
availability of sulfur and making recommendations; see pages 22-24 in our book, `Soiland Plant Analysis.'
MICRONUTRIENTS
The available loves of mlcronutriertsare rated from very low to very high. However, applying the
recommended amount of a certain manor element with a low rating krill not necessarily insure a crop
response because of the many factors which mayiirfluence mielahutrient response. Some of the factors
which influe%e response are: rapidly changing soil pf 1, excessive applications of N-P-K, soi; physical
problems, soil moisture extremes, excessive leaching, crop variety, and plant population. For additional
nforma5on on why plants hided midrorutrients, their availability, interactions wit'r, other nutrients and a
recommendation guide. see pages 34-45 in our book. 'Soli and Plant Analysis.'
"Our records and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may
any reference be made to the work, the results or the company in any advertising, -news release, or other public announcements without
obtaining ors:, prior written. authorization." Copyright 1977

REPORT NUMBER:
R 2.15•_c)07
ADDITION
SEND TO: DI O GRO DIVISION
POS 388
PI NEVI LLE NC 281 34-0388
DATE OF REPORT t /t )7' 9f' PAGE 1
IN AGRICULTUE1 A L LABORATORIES, INC.
IJPA
ne Road • Richmond; Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
GROWER: DONAL.D PAYNE — AL.5
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
BY:
ACCT # 4 546'
ROB[_-T T HAMILTON
COPY TO: ANNAPOL.I 6, MD
DATE" RECET VED 0.8/01 /96
DATE: OF ANPL.YS I S 09/02 /96
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
Phos-
phP s
Potassium
Sulfur
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Iron
Aluminum
Manganese
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrft
(DENT.
NO.
N
K
S ,
Ca
Mg
Na
-Fe
AI
Mn
Cu
Zn
Nitrogen
Nitrogen
mglkg
mpg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
m9 9
9 _
mg/kg
m�9
9
m9�9
mg�9
1
20560
2
20561
W
20562
4
2t_J 563
5
2c_)564
LAB
Cadmium .
Chromium
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Total
Cd
Cr
Ni
Pb
As
Hg
Se
.Nitrogen
pH
C.E.C.
MO .
NO.
�g
�g
mg/kg
�g
�g
mglk9 •.
mg/kg
mglk9
( 100g)
2i 560
1
33
:: 5
9
3.96
0.09
0.35
<' 5
c t-)561
:: 1
33
5
14
3. 47
:0. C)J.
0. 32
,; 5
20562
1
42
7
17
7.65
•::0.01
0.36
• rs;.
5
20563
1
29
r 5
14
5. 33
1`0, 01
0.33
< 5
20564
: 1
23
5
11
3.96
<:O.01
0.26
5
This report applies only to the sample(s) tested mples are
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In part, nor may any reference be made retained a jr M of thi¢�)¢ay� teatirIg.l, = 0
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. pRl FASTFAN ArRlf 11{ TURAI 0afW RaTt4RIFR INr

REPORT NUMBER: A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R22 5--087 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 - [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
SEND TO: BID GRO DIVISION
FOBi 388
PINEVILLE NC 28134-0388
DATE OF REPORT 08 / 47 / 96 PAGE 2
GROWER: DONALD FAYNE— AL5
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
ACCT # 45469
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED ROBERT HAMI LTON
BY, COPY TO: ANVAPOLIS, I
DATE RECEIVED 08/01/96
DATE OF ANALYSIS 08/02/96
NRrogen
Pho®-
Potassium
Sulfur
M*kmt
mum
Sodkn
Iron
Aknighum
Mm*ansee
Capper
Zanc
AmmmnW
Nil
SAMPLE
LAB
N
*PM
K
S
Ca
M9
Na
Fe
Al
Nh
Cu
Zn
MbWn
Nitro
IDEt�T.
NO.
mpg
mpg
g
mgrKg
ms"
MOM
rt9&9
moft
+11109
MW
6
20565
7
20566
g
20567
9
20568
10
20569
LAB
Cadmium
Chromium
Nit W
Lead
Arse*
MOM"
Selertlum
Tonal
MO
Cd
Cr
Ni
Pb
As
Hg
Se
Nill"M
PH
C.E.C.
NO.
nVkg
mgtkg
mgkg
mg*g
mpg
nVkg
mg&g
nV*9
(n000g)
20565
1
25
5
13
3.69
<0.01
0.22
5
20566
1
35
5
10
S.82
<0.01
0.25
< 5
20567
1
42
10
29
9.07
<0.01
0.33
< 5
20568
1
52
12
24
7.85
<0.01
0.12
< 5
20569
1
48
10
17
8.98
0.11
0.13
< 5
This reportAplips only tot ) tad. S ;es are
Our caponof
ned ofs and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made retait to
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. A&L EA BO INC.

REPORT NUMBER: A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R215-087 7621 Whitepine Road - Richmond, Virginia 23237 - [phone]
Fax No. [phone] l
SEND TO: D15 GRO DIVISION
Poe "'.3aa
PI NEVI LLE NC 23134--0388,
00/07/96 3
DATE OF REPORT PAGE
SAMPLES
DONALD F- A VNE -- AL5 SUBMITTED
GROWER: BY:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
r�
ACCT # 456-69
ROBERT i- -41II__T01\1
COPY TO: Fti`11�,=;f='�tl_:[ �i, 10
DATE RECEIVED �;r?!tt1. i 96
DATE OF t24NAL'YSIf3 (' f3!i:?;�?'y'
SAMPLE
LAB �
Nitrogen
pho s-
Potassium
Sutfur
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Iron
Aluminum
Manganese
g
�� r
Zinc
. Ammonia
Nitrate
(DENT.
NO.
N ..
P
K
S
Ca
Mg
Na
Fe
Al
Mn
Cu .
Zn
. Nitrogen
Nitrogen
m919
�g
mg/kg
mg1kg
mglkg
mg/kg
mglkg.
mt�lk9
Mg/kg
m9�9,
mg/kg,
mg/kg
m9lk9
mg/kg
1 1
2o57D
12
20571
13
20572 .
14
20573
15
2 t_)574
LAB
Cadmium
Chromium'
Nickel'
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Total,
`-
Cd
Cr
Ni
Pb
As
Hg
Se
Nitrogen
. pH
C.E.C.
NO. ..
mglkg
mg/kg
mg/kg -
_ mglkg
mglkg
mg/kg
mglkg
mgtkg
(meg/100g)
;
2057o
1
61.
10
24
(3.09
0. 1'3
C). 1.:3
S
2 0571
:: 1
60
9
21
10.13
0.10
C1.13
20572
1
60
6
11
S. 89
< 0. 01
Cl. 13
w,<
S
2(_)573
:. 1
40
5
12
6.40
<i0.01
0.11
c
20 574
1
3(3
6
1.3
6. 65
;t Q. 01
O. 12
:: 5
;
" This report applies only to the sample(s) tested. Samples are
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or in part, nor may any reference be made retainetlfflnq�_a,
o} thir}y�a � atser tegtingq I:.
to the work, the results, or the company In any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. A&L ER CULTURAL LAB RATORIES, INC.
Y

REPORT NUMBER: A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R215-097 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone] (:
SEND TO: 810 GRO DIVISION
POB 38B
PINEVILLE NC 28134-0398
DATE OF REPORT V8�t77�95�' PAGE 4
SAMPLES
GROWER: DONAL.D PAYNE— AL5 SUBMITTED
BY:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
l�
0
ACCT # 4` 4->9
RI-JFtERT HAMIi._.TCIN
COPY TO: Ar�isar�r't-)L_ [ Sy IvtiD
DATE RECEIVED i `?,f )
DA'rE OF ANALYSIS i..J
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
N
Phos-
phorus
Potassium
Sulfur
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Iron
Aluminum
Man anew
9
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrate
(DENT.
NO.
mglkg
P
mglkg
K
mglkg
S
mglkg
mglkg _
Mg
mglkg
Na
mglkg
Fe
mglkg
Al
mglkg
Mn
mglkg
Cu
mglkg
Zn
mglkg
Nitrogen
mglkg
Nitrogen
mg/kg
16
20575
17 yy
20576
R 5
LAB
Cadmium
Chromium,
Nickel.
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Total
NO. '.
Cd
mglkg.
Cr
mglkg
Ni
mglkg
Pb
mg1kg
As
mg/kg,
Hg
mg/kg
Se
mg1kg
Nitrogen
mgkg .
pH.
C.E.C.
(mXV100g)
MO
20575
:: 1
36
a
9
7.40
o.11
0.12
;. 5
2(--)576
1
43
5
13
4. 49
;fit. 01
0.11
5
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made This report applies only to the sample(s) tested. Samples are
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. retained axim f tth;¢ay� aver te�tin�,Il:
h&L E�R G I ULTU AL LABORATORIES, INC.

SOIL SERIES: BETHLEHEM
PROFILE DESCRIPTION: The Bethlehem series consists of moderately
deep, well drained soils on ridgeetops and side slopes in the
Piedmont. These soils formed in .residuum weathered from
sillimanite schist. Slopes range from 2 to 15 percent. Bethlehem
soils -are commonly adjacent Hibritten, Pacolet, Rion, and Chwacla
soils.
SOIL SERIES: BUNCOMBE
PROFILE DESCRIPTION: The Buncombe series consists of deep,
excessively drained soils on flood plains, These soils formed in
recent alluvium along the larger streams. They have a brown sandy
surface layer, but they lack a B horizon. Slopes range from 0 to
8 percent,
These soils are low in organic -matter content, natural fertility,
and available water -holding capacity. They are strongly acid. The
Buncombe soils occur with the Congaree soils. They are deeper,
lighter colored, and coarser textured than the Congaree soils.
SOIL SERIES: CECIL
PROFILE. -DESCRIPTION: The Cecil series consists.of well drained,
nearly level to steep soils on Piedmont uplands. Typically these
soils have a sandy loam surface layer about 7 inches thick. The
-subsoil is dominantly red clay and clay loam 43 inches thick. The
underlying material is multicolored, loamy saprol'ite of acid
_crystalline rock. Slopes range from 0 to 25 percent:` Bedrock is
at a depth greater than 60 inches.
SOIL SERIES: CHEWACLA
PROFILE DESCRIPTION: The Chewacla series consists of somewhat
poorly drained soils on nearly level flood plains. Typically, they
have brown loam surface layers, 8 inches thick. The subsoil is 50
inches thick. It is dark yellowish brown and yellowish brown silt
loam in the upper part, light yellowish brown loam in the middle
part, and light brownish gray silty clay loam in the lower part.
The underlying material is sand and extremely gravely sand. They
formed in fluvial sediments. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. Bedrock
is at a depth greater than 60 inches.
SOIL SERIES: DOGUE
PROFILE DESCRIPTION: Dogue fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
rarely flooded. Thi very deep, moderately well drained soil is on
gently sloping low stream terraces of the piedmont. Many areas are
somewhat elongated and range from 4 to about 40 acres in size.,

Typically the surface layer is dark grayish brown fine sandy loam,
2 inches thick. The subssurface layer is brown fine sandy loam, 6
inches thick. The subsoil is 44 inches thick. It is brownish
yellow clay loam in the upper part, brownish yellow clay with red
and light gray mottles in the middle part, gray clay with strong
-, clay loam with brownish yellow mottles in the lower part. The
underlying material, to a depth of 60 inches, is light gray sandy
clay loam.
Dogue soil has moderately slow permeability and medium surface
runoff from bare and unprotected areas, Shrink -swell potential of
the subsoil is moderate. Depth to bedrock is greater than 6 feet.
The seasonal high water table is 1.5 to 3 feet below the surface.
The soil is subect to rare flooding. Soil reaction is extremely
acid to strongly acid unless limed.
SOIL SERIES: PACOLET
PROFILE DESCRIPTION: The Pacolet series consists of deep well
drained soils with a brown sandy clay loam surface layer and red
clayey subsoil. These soils are formed from weathered rock and are
commonly found on the piedmont uplands. They have slopes ranging
from 2 to-25 percent. Pacolt soils are moderately permeable and
slightly acid. The C horion consists of a multi -colored saprolite.
They are,pommonly found near Rien, Wedowee, Masada,_ Chewacla, and
Toccoa soils.
SOIL'SEAIES: RIVERVIEW
PROFILE DESCRIPTION: Riverview series consists of very deep well
drained soils on flood plains in piedmont. Surface layer brc,;n
fine sandy loam 10 inches thick. Subsoil 33 inches thick, yellow
red silty clay loam. Seasonal high water 3 to 5 feet below the
surface.
r

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Attachment 8: Site Life Evaluations
echnoloies Inc::.;............................................................................................
Wheelabrator Water T................:.;:.;:;.;Bio Gro Division
g

TOWN OF TAYL1m3vru.E
LAB REPORT:R062-306
DOSAGE RATE EVALUATION
PERMIT INFORMATION (LIFETIME RATES)
CONCENTRATION
LBS/DT
Allowable
Allowable
PARAMETER (PPM)
of Sludge
Ibs/ac
DT/AC
PAN (inject) 39,219
78.438
100 - 200
1.27 2.55
PAN (surface) 32,469
64.938
100 - 200
1.54 3.08
P Phosphorus
13,900
27.800
K Potassium
6,100
12.200
Zn Zinc
346
0.692
2,492.0 cumm.
Cu Copper
172
0.344
1,335.0 cumm.
As Arsenic
0.8
0.002
36.5 cumm.
Cd Cadmium
1.0
0.002
33.0 cumm.
Cr Chromium
86.0
0.172
2,670.0 cumm.
Pb Lead
17
0.034
267.0 cumm.
Hg Mercury
0.390
0.001
14.0 cumm.
Mo Molybdenum
5.0
0.010
16.0 cumm.
NI Nickel
34
0.068
373.0 cumm.
Se Selenium
1.16
0.002
89.0 cumm.
Formulae:
Plant Available N = ((f (ppm Org N)) + (ppm NH -N) +(ppm NO-N))0.002
(Inject)
Plant Available N = ((f (ppm Org N)) + v (ppm NH -N) + (ppm NO-N))0.002
(Surface)
parameter (lbs/DT) = parameter (ppm) x 0.002
PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
DT Sludge/AC Load/AC
K
CROP
PAN Required
(surface) (surface)
#/AC
Cam (Silage)
220
3.3 16.3
40.7
Cam (Grain)
220
3.4 16.4
41.0
Fescue/Hay/Pasture
250
3.8 18.8
47.0
Soybeans
150
2.3 11.3
28.2
Wheat & Barley
100
1.5 7.3
18.2
Clover/Alfalfa
250
3.8 18.6
46.4
Bermuda Grass
220
3.3 16.3
40.7
DT Sludge/AC Load/AC
K
CROP
PAN Required
(inject) (inject)
#/AC
Cam (Silage)
220
2.8 13.6
33.9
Cam (Grain)
220
2.8 13.5
33.6
FescuelHay/Pasture
250
3.2 15.5
38.7
Soybeans
150
1.9 9.3
23.2
Wheat & Barley
100
1.3 6.2
15.6
Clover/Alfalfa
250
3.2 15.6
38.9
Bermuda Grass
220
2.8 13.7
34.2
3,601.2
3,880.8
22530.9
16,600.0
15523.3
7,852.9
17948.7
1500.0
5,485.3
38362.1
I
Input Data for
Plant Available Nitrogen
Ammonia Nitrogen %
1.35
Nitrate Nitrogen PPM
189
Organic Nitrogen %
8.51
Digestion Factor
0.3
Percent Solids
0.7
GL or CY / Load
6500
Dry Tons Per Load
0.20
TERMS:
f = mineralization rate = Digestion Factor
v = non volatilized fraction of NH - N = 0.50
PAN = Plant Available Nitrogen
NOTE: This utilizes EPA Part 503.13 Standards
or North Carolina Standards whichever Is
the most stringent.
CEC<5
P
METALS: LIFETIME YEARS BASED ON PAN
DT/AC
Ibs/acre Cd
Cu
Zn
Ni
Pb
As
92.8 4,943.3 yr
•'"••'•'• yr
•"""« yr
1,643.4 yr
2,352.7 yr
6,760.1 yr
93.3 4,913.9 yr
••"'"'"'" yr
•«""'• yr
1,633.6 yr
2,338.7 yr
6,709.9 yr
107.0 4,285.9 yr
•""""""'• yr
935.4 yr
1,424.8 yr
2,039.8 yr
5,852.4 yr
64.2 7,143.2 yr
«"'""«• yr
•••••"•"' yr
2,374.7 yr
3,399.7 yr
9,754.1 yr
41.4 11,074.3 yr
"•'"•"'• yr
••'•••'•` yr
3,681.6 yr
6,270.7 yr
15,122.1 yr
105.6 4,342.3 yr
••"""••yr
947.7 yr
1,443.6 yr
2,066.7 yr
5,929.4 yr
92.8 4,943.3 yr
«•"•""• yr
•"•••""•' yr
1,643.4 yr
2,352.7 yr
6,750.1 yr
CEC < 5
P
METALS: LIFETIME YEARS BASED ON PAN
DT/AC
Ibs/acre Cd
Cu
Zn
Ni
Pb
As
77.3 5,933.4 yr
"'"""'""• yr
••••'"'"" yr
1,972.5 yr
2,823.9 yr
8,102.1 yr
76.6 5,989.6 yr
••"'"""'•yr
•••"•"'"•yr
1,991.2 yr
2,850.7 yr
8.178.9 yr
88.2 5,199.7 yr
"'""'••`yr
••"'"'"`yr
1,728.6 yr
2,474.7 yr
7.100.3 yr
52.8 8,691.8 yr
«""«"yr
•""•••"«yr
2,889.6 yr
4,136.7 yr
11,868.7 yr
35.4 12,942.3 yr
"••'"•"' yr
•'••••••• yr
4,302.6 yr
6,159.7 yr
17,672.8 yr
88.6 5,176.9 yr
«"""'• yr
••'•"'•• yr
1,721.0 yr
2,463.9 yr
7,069.1 yr
78.0 5,882.9 yr
•"'"'"« yr
•""•••« yr
1,955.7 yr
2,799.9 yr
8,033.1 yr
Se Mo Hg Cr
11,493.1 yr
449.4 yr
5,377.3 yr
4,650.7 yr
11,424.6 yr
446.7 yr
5,345.3 yr
4,623.0 yr
9,964.6 yr
389.6 yr
4,662.2 yr
4,032.2 yr
16,607.7 yr
649.4 yr
7,770.4 yr
6,720.3 yr
25,747.6 yr
1,006.8 yr
12,046.7 yr
10,418.8 yr
10,095.7 yr
394.8 yr
4,723.6 yr
4,085.3 yr
11,493.1 yr
449.4 yr
6,377.3 yr
4,650.7 yr
Se
Mo
Hg
Cr
13,795.0 yr
539.4 yr
6,454.4 yr
5,582.2 yr
13,925.7 yr
544.5 yr
6,515.5 yr
5,635.1 yr
12,089.3 yr
472.7 yr
5,656.3 yr
4,891.9 yr
20,208.2 yr
790.2 yr
9,456.0 yr
8,177.3 yr
30,090.4 yr
1,176.6 yr
14,078.6 yr
12,176.1 yr
12,036.2 yr
470.6 yr
5,631.4 yr
4.870.5 yr
13,677.5 yr
534.8 yr
6,399.4 yr
5.534.6 yr

or
1
TvResidual PAPS
Available" Report
Amount Remaining
Naeidual PAN
Balance
Balance in rr0-N up�mara Aced
Aliaezalinad
Ava,ylable
Thie^---r-119-6)-----
Year
Or9-N
Lbe/Agra Rate
of 0rd^p Lba/fie ---_
<e> Lbe/Acre tlaavin9> __ ----
1me/Aare ^..�
o!
APP 1
APPLied --^-
'--^_-�'`� -__ -----' _ _
$i.oeolide 2gPa
---^'
----
- -- ------
_20 --------
Lally minera]iee ,
Field SA ___
- ---_"------ — ----
1992
T®1e ORg-N' bee been
17 laavino 190
-------------------
W_AL-00002-0-0002
2080 O1L1Q
30.00 'b o!
27 leaving ->
12 Lbe Per Acrs
2994
257 2995
1995 15.00 % of
180
� 12 <--------'--
959
1996 0.00Ib of
1 laavimg
0 Lbe Par Aare
2 1995 30.00 'd of
2 -_--
1 0 <------- -----
1995
1996 15.00 IA Of
o Yinaraliaatlwo Traokadl•----------------------.
"------- lioatiome " 12 yba Per Acre
Corr mt Year APPlioatlan IN ------------------- ,
----'-----P
1996
--------'__-_--"
PAN Available in 1996 from Prior Xoare'
_----"---'---' -----------'----^'----
_---__-
g�arp !oz Field NC-AL00002-0-
Total flaaidnal
O

"Residual PAN Available" Report
Year
of
Riold M Rioealida Type Appl
Orp-V
Lbw/Aare
Applied
Rate
Hinecaliaed <nt>
----
®alanoe
of Orq-If
Lbe/flora
------------
Aoovnt
of Orp-N
lEineralised
o-> 1ba/Aace
--- ------------
Remainlno
Balanoe
Vaninerel3eed
<leavinO Lba/Acre ----
--------- ----------
Residual PAN
A+ailable
lbia Year (19961
--
-------------------
NC-AL-00002-0-0001 2080 O1L10) 1995
150
1996 15.00 • of
ill
. l7
a 17
lervin I11
<----------------------- >
17 Lbe Par Aare
-------------------
O p
M
W
1996 3 Cd=ent Year Applieatiom (No Hineraliaatiom Teackedl. ---------------------------------
-_^------ .=y f996 tram Prior Yeaze' Applioatione 17 Lbe Per Acre
or M61d LTC-AL-00002-0-0001 .. Dotal ReaidOal PAN Available 1n 1

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
..... ....... ......... . ........... ................. .........
Section 3.0 Site Specific Information
Site Summary Sheet
Site AL4
Site AL5
............... X
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
SITE SUMMARY SHEET
Town of Taylorsville
SITE
GROSS ACRES
NET ACRES
AL4
61.5
50.0
AL5
236.8
217.5
Total
298.3
267.5
.......................................................................................
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
......... .; ... ; ........
..... ... ............. .....
.......... X XXX .. .. .........
- -.:- M ................................... ...........
............. .. ......... .. ....... ......................... . ............. ................. .. ...... ......................... "I .. .....
Site AIL4
Request and Consent for Biosolids
Site Summary Sheet
Field Data Sheets
Vicinity Map
Site Map
Topographic Map
Soils Map
Flood Plain
............
..... ........ .............. . . ... ......... ........... .... . .. ....... .......
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of TV-orsville . .. ....... . Land Application Sites
. .. ............... . . .. ...........
. . . ........................
..................
................ * .........
Request and Consent for Biosolids
. ........ .......
.................. .. - " ­ .. .:
...... ...... .......... :.":.
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

J
B10 �`Division
AskWheelabrator Clean Water Systems Inc.
REQUEST AND CONSENT FOR BIOSOLIDS
SOURCE:
FARM OPE
ADDRESS:
PHONE: ( 6 Sa )
FARM LOCATION:
TOTAL ACREAGE: COUNTY-
CROPS:
1. I agree to be responsible for adhering to the following conditions, where applicable:
a. The soil pH will be adjusted to> 0 when biosolids are applied. (This may be accomplished_ through the application
of lime -treated biosolids.)
b. Do not graze animals on the land for 30 days after the application of bios lids. In addition, animals intende'dJor d3i y
production shall not be allowed to graze on the land for 3 O days a er the application of biosolids.
c. Food crops with hafvested parts that touch the biosolids/soil mixture and are to ally above the land surface shall not be
harvested for 2 Lf months after the application of biosolids. \ //
d. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for Z .6a months after the
application of biosolids when the biosolids remain on the land surface > 4 months prior to incorporation into the soil,
or 38 months when the biosolids remain on the land surface < 4 months prior to incorporation.
e. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for 30 days after application of biosolids.
f. Public access to land with a low potential for public exposure shall be restricted for days. Public access to land
with a high potential for public exposure shall be restricted for 1 year.
g. Turf grown on land where biosolids are applied shall not be harvested for one year after application of biosolids when
the harvested turf is placed on either land with a high potential for public exposure or a lawn, unless otherwise specified
by the permitting authority.
2. 1 understand that this transaction is not contemplated by the parties to be a sale of goods, and that Wheelabrator Clean
Water Systems Inc. - Bio Gro Division (hereinafter Bio Gro) is willing to provide to me without charge the service of land
applying biosolids which have been approved by the appropriate regulatory agencies for land application.
3. 1 understand that successful crop production depends on many variables, such as weather, soil conditions and specific
farming practices and that while Bio Gro has experience with land application of biosolids, the responsibility for properly
accommodating agricultural practices to biosolids utilization are solely mine. I have also read and understand the "Important
Information About Using Biosolids as a Fertilizer" which is on the reverse side and incorporated by reference in this Request
and Consent. ,
OPERATOR'S SIB
- - DATE'
❑ WCWS-Bio Gro Division • 900 Fox\Valley Drive, Suite 210 Longwood, FL 32779 • 407/682-2272
❑ WCWS-Bio Gro Division • 12701 Lancaster Highway • Pineville, NC 28134 ^ 704/542-0937
BGDRQNC • 5/95
WHITE: Regional Office
CANARY. Farmer

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT USING BIOSOLIDS AS A FERTILIZER
Biosolids Generation
Biosolids are the accumulated, treated solids that are separated from water during the wastewater treatment process. Biosolids
are produced by public and private wastewater treatment plants (Generators). The Generator is responsible for supplying
biosolids that are suitable for land application according to state and federal specifications.
Benefits of Biosolids
Biosolids provide nitrogen in a form that can be taken up by plants during their growth cycle. Biosolids also add phosphorus
to the soil. If lime is added to biosolids, the biosolids will have the added benefit of a liming agent. Biosolids contain many
primary, secondary and micronutrients that can be used by plants. Biosolids are primarily an organic material; when added to
soil, they improve water and nutrient retention, reduce erosion potential and improve soil structure.
The Permitting Process
Once the farm operator requests biosolids, a Bio Gro representative initially-evaluates.the farm, for ttuck access and field
conditions. If the farm is found to be suitable and the Request for Biosolids and the Consent for Biosolids forms are signed, Bio
Gro will collect soil samples and have them analyzed by an independent laboratory.
Bio Gro will then apply for any federal, state or local permits required for biosolids application. The permits will specifically
identify the fields to which biosolids will be applied and will be issued to Bio Gro or the Generator.
After the permits are obtained (a process that may take several months or more) Bio Gro will apply biosolids, as they become
available, to the fields. Availability of biosolids may vary because of weather conditions; contractual arrangements with biosolids
generators and other factors. Although the company cannot guarantee biosolids application because of factors beyond its
control, Bio Gro will use its best efforts to apply biosolids to the permitted fields.
The conditions outlined in the permit will apply to ariy and all biosolids applications made by Bio Gro. Bio Gro will not be
responsible for biosolids applications made by any other entity.
Periodic visits to the land application site(s) by federal, state and local regulatory staff and Bio Gro representatives may occur for
the purpose of permitting the site, inspecting the site, applying biosolids, obtaining samples at the site and testing. Proper
identification will be provided upon request.
Agronomic Considerations
Tractor -trailer units are used to deliver biosolids to the fields approved for biosolids applications. Soil compaction may occur on
the travel areas used by the trucks and in areas where biosolids is unloaded for transfer to the applicator vehicle.
Since some biosolids contain lime, it is important to recognize any increase in soil pH where biosolids have been applied and
exercise care in using certain herbicides. If considering the use of a sulfonylurea herbicide, particular attention should be paid
to any label restrictions. High soil pH and dry weather may slow decomposition of these chemicals, resulting in carry-over. For
soils with low manganese levels, increased soil pH from lime addition (alone or in lime treated biosolids) may reduce manganese
availability and thereby potentially reduce crop yields.
In planning a herbicide program, it should be noted that seeds may sometimes survive the biosolids treatment process — for
example, tomato seeds. Also, the organic matter additions from biosolids application (organic matter tends to tie up certain
herbicides) may require increased herbicide application rates. Consult your extension agent or chemical representative for a
specific recommendation.
Biosolids contain salts. Biosolids applications alone rarely cause salt problems. However, if combined with other significant
salt -increasing factors, such as drought, excessive soil compaction, saline irrigation water and salt -containing fertilizers, salts
may reach levels that could negatively affect germination and growth of some crops.
While odor from biosolids applications are not usually significant, and typically less than that from livestock manure, it is
possible that an odor from the decomposition of organic matter may be noticed. If this occurs, it generally disappears in a short
time.
Since biosolids provide nitrogen that will be released slowly throughout the growing season with diminishing carry-over in
subsequent years, it is important to reduce the use of nitrogen and other fertilizers to appropriate levels.

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Site Summary Sheet
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Tavlorsville Land Application Sites
SITE SUMMARY SHEET
Site AL4
FIELD
GROSS ACRES
NET ACRES
OWNER
William H. Marshall
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Field Data Sheets
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AI-4-1
ACRES
Gross
24.8
Net
23.1
OPERATOR
Robert L. Marshall
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina/Hiddenite, North Carolina
LATITUDE: 35055'30" LONGITUDE: 81007-30"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3 and 4
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil Sandy Clay Loam (CeBz)
............
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AI-4-2
ACRES
Gross
23.5
Net
15.5
OPERATOR
Robert L. Marshall
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina/Hiddenite, North Carolina
LATITUDE: 35055'30" LONGITUDE: 81 °07'30"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3 and 4
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil Sandy Clay Loam (CeBz)
......................................................
:.;;:;.;;;:.;:««.;:;;.;;;:.;:.;:.;;::.::.::.;;;::::.;:.;::;:.;;::>::>::>::>:«:<:::.;>::>:.>:.>::>:::>:::::::::::::::.;:.;;::<::.;:::.::::.;::.;;:.;:.;:;:.;:.;:.;::<:;:;:«.;:.>::.;;:.;:.>:.;:.::.;:
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AL4-3
ACRES
Gross
13.2
Net
11.4
OPERATOR
Robert L. Marshall
OWNER
Robert and
William Marshall
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carol ina/Hiddenite, North Carolina
LATITUDE: 35°55'30" LONGITUDE: 81 °07'30"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
F3and 4
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil Sandy Clay Loam (CeBz)
..........
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................::;:.;:.;::.;;:.:
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Vicinity Map
Wheelabrator Water Technologiies Inc;.;:.;;:........................................................... ...................................................... .. n
:.::.:::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::..::.::::.;:.;:.;:.::.::;;;;;::::.::.:::.::......:..... .
g Bio Gro Division

I
Heelabrab- Clean Water Systems Inc.
RA Division
SCALE: 1" = 2 miles
A WHEELABRATOR TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
VICINITY MAP
Land Application • BI0*F1X Alkaline Stabilization
IPS Composting • Drying and Pelletizing
Southern Region
908 Belcher Drive
Pelham, AL 35124
205.664.8440
205.664.7678 Fax
Site AL4
N
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
.......... I ....... .... .. .... . ....... . . ........ ......... . ...... ..... .. ... .......... ....... . .....
Site Map
. . . .... .... X.: ....... ......
.......... ....... .... .
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

%� \%� �
CJ � ��` ; � �
�}%!�§
����/
\�^� � ~�
f� z %
® ® % g.<7
• , /\;//� �
, : ». ,
-� �%� �\/§�
J�'Z: ©,. ii,
. a/./2�>
�`�w\\���^�
¥ � «� @�« /� \
�� �� \� j\\§
,t� V d (6�
,. " .� � . //.
%^' « ,4 ~
`:�� � !3� �
2j� .� y. y« 6
�. »
��,�:; 223�
,9,w a. ��
J��2\/99� /
2}:�- \�:�
� � ®:ram w
»^f
� / \�
. a {� § > f
�� ' \: \;
%�� \£� 2\�
' y,/k� /.2• v
)�:\�/�/�:(
` :'_>� � :
� �\> w
� —/¥
��/\\G���\
w,
���d�� \� \
\/ �2\�sw.
)� �\�� \/ � �
�'t:w\,ate.
4J%3/ ®`� ?»�
' �� \ � � \� \
\�\' � k
�\ ^�w y�}>4
.e/\« �� ��(
yy,aw��. z»
2 Ja Q � \ ,� j
>`; /\2� /z
.\� z�� � � ; /
�:�,/
, .�.,�6
/�/ w{�ƒ2�
:yG�.. �;

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Topographic Map
......... . . . . . . .
.........
. . ....... ....
.......... ............. .
.............. .......... . . ..
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

/A Wheelabrator Clean Water Systems lnc.
BAGH0 vi '
SCALE: 1:24,000
Southern Region
908 Bcicher Drive
Pelham, AL 35124
205.664.8440
205.664.7678 Fax
30sm
Site AL4, Fields 1, 2, and 3
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Land Application • BID*M Alkaline Stabilization
A WIME..LADRATOR ]ECHNOLOOIES COMPANY IPS Composting • Drying and Pelletizing
ICJ
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Soils Map
::.:::.:::.::.::.::.::.::.::.::.:::.::::.:::; ......... ......... ......................
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

' � •1 s p"j�� i
'rew
4
WIN
b'
�10F�,�..
1 y�` y
kMsomw
.9 L
1 a , � i i�Jjjr g � I P"�1e ^'.f �� . �i �'� a �. I't '�. r 4 �r � J•
01 MR
�i y� � ✓ , � �,, ` :Ifs .f� P �a �r �,q
s�1w' �t. • 'r „�'�a� t t�. at � c� '�'��p' aL+ �� 7
"°�

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Flood Plains
No fields for Robert L. Marshall (AI-4) are located within the 100 year flood plain.
.................... ............. .......................................................: ::.:.... :::.:::<.;:.......................
........................................:.;:.;;:.::;:.;;:;.;:............................................ .................. .
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
........... .. ... . . ......... .......
............... .. . . .. .... . .... ... .....
Site AL5
Request and Consent for Biosolids
Site Summary Sheet
Field Data Sheets
Vicinity Map
Site Map
Topographic Map
Soils Map
Flood Plain
..... ....... ... ................
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Request and Consent for Biosolids
..... ..:...............................................
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

REQUEST AND CONSENT FOR SIOSOLIDS
SOURCE: i
FARM OPERATOR:_ J VoNld �� '��
ADDRESS: -- pp LEI N _S/o`� e
PHONE: 72, Z 3
FARM LOCATION:
TOTAL ACREAGE: COUNTY: A $G.�I,yi, r?,
CROPS: S0
1. 1 agree to be responsible for adhering to the following conditions, where applicable:
a. The soil pH will be adjusted to ) when biosolids are applied. (This may be accomplished through
the application of lime -treated biosolids.)
b. Animals shall not be allowed to graze on the land for 30 days after the application of biosolids. In
addition, animals intended for dairy production shall not be allowed to graze on the land for /)
days after the application of biosolids.
r C. Food crops with harvested parts that tquch the biosolids/soil mixture and are totally above the land
surface shall not be harvested for f I months after the application of biosolids.
d. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for Z &
months after the application of biosolids when the biosolids remain on the land surface >_ 4 months
prior to incorporation into the soil, or 38 months when the biosolids remain on the land surface < 4
months prior to incorporation.
e. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for 30 days after application of
biosolids.
f. Public access to land with a low potential for public exposure shall be restricted for �� v days.
Public access to land with a high potential for public exposure shall be restricted for 1 year.
g. Turf grown on land where biosolids are applied shall not be harvested for one year after application
of biosolids when the harvested turf is placed on either land with a high potential for public exposure
or a lawn, unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority.
2. 1 understand that this transaction is not contemplated by the parties to be a sale of goods, and that Bio Gro
Systems is willing to provide to me without charge the service of land applying biosolids which have been
approved by the appropriate regulatory agencies for land application.
3. 1 understand that successful crop production depends on many variables, such as weather, soil conditions
and specific farming practices and that while Bio Gro has experience with land application of biosolids, the
responsibility for properly accommodating agricultural practices to biosolids utilization are solely mine. I
have also read and understand the document entitled "Important Information About Using Biosolids as a
Fertilizer" which is on the reverse side and incorporated by reference.
OPERATOR'S SIGNATURE
DATE
/6
❑ Bio Gro Systems, Inc. • 900 Fox Valley Drive, Suite 210 • Longwood, FL 32779 • [phone]
❑ Bio Gro Systems, Inc. • 12701 Lancaster Highway, Pineville, NC 28134 • [phone]
BGSRQNC-9/93 WHITE - Regional Office CANARY— Farmer

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT USING BIOSOLIDS AS A FERTILIZER
Biosolids Generation
Biosolids are the accumulated, treated solids that are separated from water during the wastewater treatment process.
Biosolids are produced by public and private wastewater treatment plants (Generators). The Generator is responsible for
supplying biosolids that are suitable for land application according to state and federal specifications.
Benefits of Biosolids
Biosolids provide nitrogen in a form that can be taken up by plants during their growth cycle. Biosolids also add phosphorus
to the soil. If lime is added to biosolids, the biosolids will have the added benefit of a liming agent. Biosolids contain many
primary, secondary and micronutrients that can be used by plants. Biosolids are primarily an organic material; when added
to soil, they improve water and nutrient retention, reduce erosion potential and improve soil structure.
The Permitting Process
Once the farm operator requests biosolids, a Bio Gro representative initially evaluates the farm for truck access and field
conditions. If the farm is found to be suitable and the Request for Biosolids and the Consent for Biosolids forms are signed,
Bio Gro Systems will collect soil samples and have them analyzed by an independent laboratory.
Bio Gro Systems will then apply for any federal, state or local permits required for biosolids application. The permits will
specifically identify the fields to which biosolids will be applied and will be issued to Bio Gro Systems or the Generator.
Afterthe permits are obtained (a process that may take several months or more) Bio Gro Systems will apply biosolids, as they
become available, to the fields. Availability of biosolids may vary because of weather conditions; contractual arrangements
with biosolids generators and other factors. Although the company cannot guarantee biosolids application because of factors
beyond its control, Bio Gro Systems will use its best efforts to apply biosoiiasiio the permitted fields.
The conditions outlined in the permit will apply to any and all biosolids applications made by Bio Gro Systems. Bio Gro
Systems will not be responsible for biosolids applications made by any other entity.
Periodic visits to the land application site(s) by federal, state and local regulatory staff and Bio Gro Systems representatives
may occur for the purpose of permitting the site, inspecting the site, applying biosolids, obtaining samples at the site and
testing. Proper identification will be provided upon request.
ronomic Considerations
Tractor -trailer units are used to deliver biosolids to the fields approved for biosolids applications. Soil compaction may occur
on the travel areas used by the trucks and in areas where biosolids are unloaded for transfer to the applicator vehicle.
Since some biosolids contain lime, it is important to recognize any increase in soil pH where biosolids have been applied and
exercise care in using certain herbicides. If considering the use of a sulfonylurea herbicide, particular attention should be paid
to any label restrictions. High soil pH and dry weather may slow decomposition of these chemicals, resulting in carry-over.
In planning a herbicide program, it should be noted that seeds may sometimes survive the biosolids treatment process —for
example, tomato seeds. Also, the organic matter additions from biosolids application (organic matter tends to tie up certain
herbicides) may require increased herbicide application rates. Consult your extension agent or chemical representative for a
specific recommendation.
Biosolids contain salts. Biosolids applications alone rarely cause salt problems. However, if combined with other significant
salt -increasing factors, such as drought, excessive soil compaction, saline irrigation water and salt -containing fertilizers, salts
may reach levels that could negatively affect germination and growth of some crops.
While odor from biosolids applications are rarely significant, and typically less than odor from livestock manure, it is possible
that an odor from the decomposition of organic matter may be noticed. If any odor occurs, it generally lasts for a few days or
less.
Since biosolids provide nitrogen that. will be released slowly throughout the growing season with diminishing carry-over in
subsequent years, it is important to reduce the use of nitrogen and other fertilizers to appropriate levels.

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Site Field Summary Sheet

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
SITE SUMMARY SHEET
Site AL5
FIELD
GROSS ACRES
NET ACRES
OWNER
1
11.8
10.3
Donald G. Payne
2
12.2
11.8
Donald G. Payne
3
13.4
12.9
Donald G. Payne
4
14.8
12.8
Donald G. Payne
5
12.6
12.5
Donald G. Payne
6
12.2
12.1
Donald G. Payne
7
12.2
12.1
Donald G. Payne
8
6.0
6.0
Donald G. Payne
9
81.1
73.0
Donald G. Payne
10
8.5
7.4
Donald G. Payne
11
6.9
6.0
Donald G. Payne
12
6.3
5.2
Donald G. Payne
13
5.8
4.5
Donald G. Payne
14
4.2
3.4
Donald G. Payne
15
9.1
7.8
Donald G. Payne
16
11.4
11.4
Donald G. Payne
17
8.3
8.3
Donald G. Payne
Total
236.8
217.5
.......:................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Field Data Sheets
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AI-5-1
ACRES
Gross
11.8
Net
10.3
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 35' 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 81 ° 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
....:...............................::.;: «<:.;::.;:::<.;:.::.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.:::.::.;:.;;;;:.;:.;;;::.;:.;:.;;: <.;:.;:<.;:................................................................................::::::::::::::::.:::::::.:::::::::.::::::::::::::....:.:::.:: .
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AL5-2
ACRES
Gross
12.2
Net
11.8
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 35' 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 81 ° 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
............. ............
............:::;:::::.>;::<::;:.............................;;:.;:.;:.;;;:.;;:::.........................................................................:::>::»» ;..........................::....::.::.:::.
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AI-5-3
ACRES
Gross
13.4
Net
12.9
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 350 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 81 ° 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
.......:........................................................................................................... ................ ................... .............................................................::.::.:
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AL5-4
ACRES
Gross
14.8
Net
12.8
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 35' 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 81 ° 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
.................................................................................................................................................
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AI-5-5
ACRES
Gross
12.6
Net
12.5
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 35' 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 81 ° 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
.........
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AL5-6
ACRES
Gross
12.2
Net
12.1
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 35' 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 810 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
.....................................................:.;::;;;:.;:.;;:.;;;................:.;:;:.;;:...............................:::.:.;;;;::::::::.:............ ...:;.;;:.;: ;>;::>:.>::>::>::>::>:<:;::>:.;::::.......:::.:::::::::::::::::: .
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AI-5-7
ACRES
Gross
12.2
Net
12.1
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 35' 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 81 ° 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
X.
...:...............................:::.:::.;:;;:.;;::::....................................... ........................... ........................ .............................. ... ..........................::::::: .
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AL5-8
ACRES
Gross
6.0
Net
6.0
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 350 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 81' 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AL5-9
ACRES
Gross
81.1
Net
73.0
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 35' 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 810 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
......
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AI5-10
ACRES
Gross
8.5
Net
7.4
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 350 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 81 ° 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
.......:........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AI5-11
ACRES
Gross
6.9
Net
6.0
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 35' 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 81 ° 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
........................ ..................
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AL5-12
ACRES
Gross
6.3
Net
5.2
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 35' 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 810 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
.............
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AI5-13
ACRES
Gross
5.8
Net
4.5
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 35' 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 81 ° 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
XXXX......................................................................
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AI5-14
ACRES
Gross
4.2
Net
3.4
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 35' 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 81 ° 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
Wheelabrator Water ies Technolog;. Inc. :::«<................................................................................................................. .. � ��Bio��G�ro��Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AI5-15
ACRES
Gross
9.1
Net
7.8
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 350 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 81 ° 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Cecil sandy clay loam (CeBz)
.............
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AL5-16
ACRES
Gross
11.4
Net
11.4
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylotsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 35' 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 810 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
PREDOMINANT SOILS
Pacolet sandy clay loam (PeBz)
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
FIELD DATA SHEET
PROJECT
Town of Taylorsville
FIELD NUMBER
AI5-17
ACRES
Gross
8.3
Net
8.3
OPERATOR
Donald G. Payne
OWNER
Same
COUNTY
Alexander
TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD
Taylorsville, North Carolina 1970
LATITUDE: 35' 52' 30" LONGITUDE: 810 08' 20"
SOIL SURVEY
USDA Alexander Co.
SHEET NO.
3
.PREDOMINANT SOILS
Pacolet sandy clay loam (PeBz)
.......:........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Vicinity Map
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

Wheelabrator Clean Water Systems Inc.
VICWITY MAP
Southern Region
908 Belcher Drive
Pelham, AL 35124
205.664.8440
205.664.7678 Fax
iLand Application • BIO*FIX Alkaline Stabilization N
A WHEELABRATOR TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY IPS Composting • Drying and Pelletizing PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
. (.

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
.......... ..... ...... . ...... ............ . . ...................
Site Maps
...... ...
-X-: ........ . ........... ........ ..
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

9
A Wheelabrator Clean Water Systems Inc.
A&MODivisioa
SITE MAP
Southern Region
908 Belcher Drive
Pelham, Al. 35124
205.664.8440
205.664.7678 Fax
Land Application • BIO*FIX Alkaline Stabilization
A WHEELABRATOR TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY HIS Composting Drying and Pelletizing PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

Fm

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
Topographic Maps
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division

I
A& Wheelahrator Clean Water systems lnc.
BI � oo
Southern Region
908 Belcher Drive
Pelham, AL 35124
205.664.8440
201.664.7678 Fax
Site AL5, Fields 1 through 17
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Land Application • BIO*FIX Alkaline Stabilization
A wnECLABRATOR TF.('IINOI.OGfFS COMPANY IPS Composting • Drying and Pelletizing
N
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
...... .. ............ ............. ..............
............ ...............
............. ............
................................
............ . .................................................. ... . .... .......... ........
Soils Maps
. ..... ..... .. ...... .
W..... ...... ...... .... .... ... .....
heelabrator Water Technologies In'c"'.' Bio . Gro Division

AL. Wheelahrator Clean Water Systems Inc.
®Div�sron
SOILS velar
r
Southern Region
908 Belcher Drive
Pelham, AL 35124
205.664.8440
205.664.7678 Fax
Land Application BIO*FlX Alkaline Stabilization
N
A WHEELABRATOR TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY IPS Composting • Drying and Pelletizing PRIMPED ON RECYCLED PAPLK
77

Town of Taylorsville Land Application Sites
... . .. ...
Flood Plains
No fields for Donald Payne (AL5) are located within the 100 year flood plain.
Wheelabrator Water Technologies Inc. Bio Gro Division