090202_Inspection_20201014

day---(v ! v ceoti
; - _ �vision�of Water Resources ; _ 1<,
'aciltty Number i �p,L P Division of Soil a$d Wafer Conse abam" �,f;
, _ y :�- . �
h enc �� l
r n' 4
s v
_ ..,r_�. - y.a i`(_ "�, r x �s n�i�..e "ie,� t .. .
c � �
l
.'Type of Visit: -eCompli nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: /0-//1--, Arrival Time: &';'pQ Departure Time: d2 ;/0 County:;. `—Region: }-
Farm Name: 4., ,r t giJ`m J/C/ -mod' . yr�K Owner Email:
Owner Name: 51h) yy',(•_ e� ,s Phone: .
Mailing Address: Q
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Ca.0 ;5 --;:a0,4/7 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ,jp , ' Integrator: � ,,e -`e/
Certified Operator: i 7 I // . Certification-Number: /��
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
: )esi n Current .°. , =t DesignCurrent -� `Pesi n ,Current
Swine Capacity Pop 4 Wet Poultry= Capacity Popes Cattle ' ECapacittg nIPop� e'
a
r Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder ?I-MO `-O----,7'' Non-Layer = Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish M - - Dairy Heifer .
Farrow to Wean Design, Current Dry Cow
',= Farrow to Feeder D: Poultr Ca aei Po Non Dairy
Farrow to Finish �� • °°;` Beef Stocker
Gilts °` •Non-La ers • Beef Feeder
` Boars •Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Other r : 9� . _,_ ,:`a�€ _•Turke Poults .;
Other ,.- .Oth
er
Discharges and Stream Impacts - •
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q' ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Qio ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ` - Date of Inspection: /tom—/L/ t/
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): /9-
Observed Freeboard(in): ry /
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [!]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 121 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Et No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application ,�
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need, ❑ Yes L_I 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): , ,q",,u.e1
13. Soil Type(s): /0,9/7 0/i / ' t%(4,5 /6„An/dv
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Ei to ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: y- - Date of Inspection: /�
24.Did the facility fail
to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 121< ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [/]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 1:3<lb ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 12' to ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 0/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain.Any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
l� Y � l'I�IZ.Z�/,/` // Y C/ �t' %7zr`
iGt /lFXJL I'/? / O /
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: ,./d
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /(2--/1i0D
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015