090201_Inspection_20200306

Nua.}-- .�v—rc--- -6 /' '— vl --
",, Q - `l ,, p _ vision of Water Resources 17
Facility Number 7 - ? / 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation s % E
6 , „ r , : :f 0`Other,Agency , ' ,'. . _ rTZLjt, i.
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: a<tine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ', Arrival Time: A9.'7i) Departure Time: /,'3 0 County: 6XX,7 L4_- Region:
Farm Name: ,57i? 3/",/ / - - Owner Email:
Owner Name: g:i a," 5/Q-ze) Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: '- L.€ { 5hz y Title: ,4can --' Phone:
Onsite Representative: ,5- e— Integrator: c/y2��J �j /-
Certified Operator: Certification Number: L9 ��
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: .L _
' Design Current . -Design Current Design Current
sf:
Swine Capacity Pop Wet Poultry Capacity Pop: Cattle ° .'Capacity Pop
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
s bean to Feeder Qv 00 Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish - = - Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Destga Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder )- Poul ,Ca'-'adPo ; - Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish ri M Beef Stocker
Gilts Non La ers -- T Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
- ■
Other •Turke Poults ��
Other •Other �� � tr4"
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - / Date of Inspection: `5—to
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): / 9
Observed Freeboard(in): #2 7
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes IZI<Ir ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment/1 threat,notify DWR
,o5`-
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? j Yes Mi o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1214o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) •
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑//No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. lYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground - ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Eviden0ce of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �"G'%ctu � / c'
13. Soil Type(s): aPt7p7.— AA
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes []N ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. 0—Cfes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard aste Analysis El Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers /Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: �}' - "0/ Date of Inspection: : &'G {7'
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: •
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ErVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes '<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Er o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 1410 ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use,e drawings of facilityfI to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
AMC�'Gf�dy vc odor-f�L W-�� /� � G2 4ce c/e 5.r 1 4-L f D c t
/u/m CX r d )-kb 1 /later LA c1 4 .54 751- .0 5.1.3 !- D t)e-b14.
/J `fr lika/ /s 73,AD Ocl 620 ke . F7- -. der a 3 )1 ss°e/in A•Ce'Arel'id 174 ;7% 63'74 tlevAgAL; 62-cir-6/73 --,0.1,
NO S �/ar� !'L IJITI'c N(e. �'�>'�rr o/o 7/
:/5 /7)(1166- A43 ,1P1711'' 1-4'124S c/r7
•
r,1,1
Reviewer/Inspector Name: rs� �� ��� Phone:'1,7•73°3 013
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: , 6 o`��
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015