20100691 Ver 1_Mitigation Plans_20100603

VU
HEATH RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITeN?*sq?4
DRAFT BUFFER RESTORATION PLAN
CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Not
EEP CONTRACT NO. 002280
Prepared for:
2010069 1
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
-i i t 1
rwormw
Prepared by:
Natural Rt sources
Rl-?ttir on&Con enawn
Restoration Systems, L.L.C.
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
April 2010

t' O
4? ? Er. a

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems, L.L.C. has contracted with EEP (FDP contract #002280) through the Full
Delivery Process (RFP #16-001383) to provide 60 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units through the
completion of the Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (Site) located approximately 3.4 miles
southeast of Dover in Craven County. The Site encompasses 60.632-acres of land, which has
been ditched and cleared for row crop production. The surface area of the water in the ditches
within the Site boundaries totals 0.632 acres and is excluded from the area used to generate
mitigation units as defined in RFP #16-001383 and Contract No. 002280. A Deed of
Conservation Easement and Survey of the Site were recorded with the Craven County Register
of Deeds on March 18, 2010.
The Site is situated along unnamed tributaries to Core Creek, a major tributary to the Neuse
River. The Site is located within DWQ sub-basin 03-04-08 of the Neuse River Basin and is
encompassed within USGS 14-digit Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed
03020202080010. Site streams drain to Core Creek (Stream Index Number 27-90). Core Creek
has a best usage designation of C, Sw, NSW and sections are listed as impaired. Sections of
Core Creek to which the Site drains are listed on the draft 2008 303(d) list for impaired
biological integrity and low dissolved oxygen. Impairment results from agricultural crop
production.
The surrounding landscape is characterized primarily by agricultural land and silviculture stands.
Agricultural land is farmed extensively where soils provide adequate drainage. Agricultural and
silviculture fields are fairly contiguous in areas where drainage systems have been
implemented. Site land use is characterized by agricultural row-crop production. Row crops
identified during field investigations include soybeans. Ditches vary from 2 to 4 feet in depth and
exhibited flow during Site visits.
This Draft Restoration Plan defines specific goals and objectives associated with the restoration
of native forest on former agricultural fields located within the Site boundaries. The primary
goals of this buffer restoration plan include 1) enhancement of water quality functions (reduce
nonpoint source sedimentation and nutrient inputs), 2) restoration of natural vegetation buffers
along onsite ditches, and 3) creation of wildlife habitat associated with a riparian corridor. Upon
successful completion of this Restoration Plan, the Site will be monitored to ensure successful
vegetation density of 320 stems per acre through the five years.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................1
2.0 PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................... ..1
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................... ..2
3.1 PHYSIOGRAPHY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND LAND USE ....................................... .. 2
3.2 WATER QUALITY .......................................................................................... .. 2
3.3 SOILS ........................................................................................................... .. 3
4.0 RESTORATION PLAN .......................................................................................... ..3
4.1 VEGETATIVE PLAN ...................................................................................... .. 3
4.2 GRADING PLAN .................................................................................... ..
4.3 FERTILIZATION PLAN ............................................................................ ..
4.4 PROJECT PHASING ..............................................................................
4.5 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA .................................................. 5
5.0 REFERENCES ...............................................................................................6
Table 1 NRCS Soils Mapped within the Site ........................................................3
Table 2 Vegetative Plan ..................................................................................4
Appendix A Figures
Figure 1 Site Location .................................................................................... Appendix A
Figure 2 Watershed Location ......................................................................... Appendix A
Figure 3 NRCS Soils Map .............................................................................. Appendix A
Figure 4 Existing Conditions ........................................................................... Appendix A
Figure 5 Recorded Survey ............................................................................. Appendix A
Appendix B EEP Floodplain Checklist
HEATH RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
DRAFT BUFFER RESTORATION PLAN
CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This draft restoration plan describes the Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (Site)
and is designed specifically to assist in fulfilling North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) restoration goals. The Site is located approximately 3.4 miles southeast of Dover,
in Craven County (Figure 1, Appendix A). This portion of Craven County is located
centrally within Neuse River Basin 8-digit Cataloging Unit 03020202 (Figure 2, Appendix
A).
The following criteria are required to provide Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units as
requested under this solicitation:
• Protect the Site in perpetuity with a conservation easement.
• Revegetate the Site.
• Monitor the Site successfully for 5 years.
This document provides a buffer restoration plan summarizing activities proposed within
the Site. The Site encompasses 60.632 acres of land utilized for timber and agricultural
row crop production, but only 60 acres are proposed for the generation of Riparian
Buffer Mitigation Units as the surface area of water in the ditches is not being used to
generate mitigation units. The plan includes 1) project goals and objectives, 2)
descriptions of existing conditions, 3) restoration plans, and 4) vegetation monitoring
plans.
2.0 PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The following project is proposed to provide 60 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units, as
calculated in accordance with the requirements stipulated in EEP Request for Proposal
#16-001383.
The primary goals of this buffer restoration project focus on improving water quality,
enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat and will be
accomplished by the following.
1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural
production including a) cessation of broadcasting fertilizer, pesticides, and
other agricultural materials into and adjacent to Site ditches, or other open
waterways and b) providing a vegetative buffer adjacent to waterways to treat
surface runoff which may be laden with sediment and/or agricultural
pollutants.
2. Reducing sedimentation within on-site and downstream receiving waters by
a) increasing retention time for surface waters entering and leaving the Site,
b) reducing bank erosion associated with vegetation maintenance and
agricultural plowing to Site ditches, and c) planting a forested vegetative
buffer adjacent to Site ditches.
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site Page 1
Restoration Plan (Contract #002280)
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by ripping soils and revegetating Site
floodplains, increasing frictional resistance on lateral surface flow across the
Site.
4. Providing terrestrial wildlife habitat including a natural forested corridor in an
area that is currently cleared of natural vegetation and highly dissected by
agricultural practices.
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 PHYSIOGRAPHY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND LAND USE
The Site is located in the Carolina Flatwoods and Mid-Atlantic Floodplains/Low Terrace
Ecoregion of North Carolina within United States Geological Survey (USGS) Cataloging
Unit 03020202080010 of the Neuse River Basin (North Carolina Division of Water
Quality [NCDWQ] sub-basin number 03-04-08). Regional physiography is characterized
by flat plains on lightly dissected marine terraces, major river floodplains and associated
terraces, swamps, Carolina bays, oxbow lakes, ponds, and low gradient streams with
sand and silt substrates. On-site elevations are relatively flat, averaging approximately
16 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) across the Site (USGS Dover, North
Carolina 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle).
The Site offers the potential of providing water quality functions to a 0.1-square mile
watershed at the Site outfall. The watershed is entirely characterized by agriculture land
utilized for row crop production, which is farmed extensively where soils provide
adequate drainage. Impervious surfaces account for less than 2 percent of the upstream
drainage area. The Site is entirely dominated by agricultural land with no impervious
surfaces.
3.2 WATER QUALITY
The Site is located within NCDWQ subbasin 03-04-08 of the Neuse River Basin and is
encompassed within USGS 14-digit Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed
03020202080010. Site streams drain to Core Creek (Stream Index Number 27-90). Core
Creek has a best usage designation of C, Sw, NSW (NCDWQ 2008b) and downstream
sections are listed as impaired. Streams with a best usage designation of C are suitable
for aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and
agriculture. Secondary recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses not involving
human body contact with waters on an organized or frequent basis. The supplemental
classification Sw (Swamp Waters) is intended for waters which have low velocities and
other natural characteristics which are different from adjacent streams. The
supplemental classification of NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters) is intended for waters
needing additional nutrient management due to their being subject to excessive growth
of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation.
According to the NCDWQ June 2008 Draft Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan, a
stressor study completed on Core Creek found high levels of nutrients and identified
pesticides and organics in the sediment, likely due to runoff from the many agricultural
fields in the area. These pesticides were related to fish kills in the Core Creek area on
April 23, 2003 and May 3, 2003. The numerous agricultural fields located in the
watershed contribute to significant sedimentation of Core Creek due to nonpoint source
runoff after rainfall events. Additionally, nutrient inputs from farmland and a few animal
operations probably contribute to nutrient enrichment and subsequent biological impacts
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site Page 2
Restoration Plan (Contract #002280)
or impairment. NCDWQ recommends continued implementation of agricultural BMPs in
this watershed to continue the effort in reducing sedimentation and nutrient loading to
the Neuse River Estuary. The proposed project is supportive of the reduction in
sediment and nutrients, which will serve to address existing deficiencies with the
watershed, and will assist NCEEP in meeting goals within the Targeted Local Watershed
03020202080010.
3.3 SOILS
Soils that occur within the Project, according to the Soil Survey of Craven County, North
Carolina (NRCS 1989) are depicted in Figure 3 (Appendix A) and described in Table 1.
Table 1. NRCS Soils Mapped within the Site
Soil Series Family Description
Rains Typic Paleaquults This series consists of poorly drained, moderately
permeable soils on flats, Carolina bays and
interstream divides. Depth to seasonal high water
table occurs at 0.5 to 1.5 feet. HYDRIC A
Pantego Umbric Paleaquults This series consists of very poorly-drained soils that
formed in moderately fine textured sediments and are
found on flats and interstream divides. HYDRIC A
4.0 RESTORATION PLAN
The primary goals of this buffer restoration project include 1) enhancement of water
quality functions (reduce nonpoint source sedimentation and nutrient inputs), 2)
restoration of natural vegetation buffers along onsite ditches, and 3) creation of wildlife
habitat associated with a riparian corridor.
Restoration of forest and stream-side habitat allows for development and expansion of
characteristic species across the landscape. Ecotonal changes between community
types contribute to diversity and provide secondary benefits, such as enhanced feeding
and nesting opportunities for mammals, birds, amphibians, and other wildlife.
4.1 VEGETATION PLAN
Onsite observations and community descriptions from Classification of the Natural
Communities of North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley 1990) were used to develop the
primary plant community associations that will be promoted during community
restoration efforts. Areas will be planted with species characteristic of the Coastal Plain
Bottomland Hardwood Forest (Table 2).
Bare-root seedlings of tree and shrub species will be planted within the Site at a density
of approximately 1000 stems per acre. Planting will be performed between December 1
and March 15 to allow plants to stabilize during the dormant period and set root during
the spring season. A total of 60,200 diagnostic tree and shrub seedlings will be planted
in support of Site buffer restoration (Table 2).
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site Page 3
Restoration Plan (Contract #002280)
Table 2. Veaetation Plan
Plant Common Name Species Name Number Planted (% of Total)
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9,500(15)
Mockernut hickory Carya tomentosa 6,300 (10)
Water oak Quercus nigra 6,300 (10)
Willow oak Quercus phellos 9,500 (15)
Chestnut oak Quercus michauxii 9,500 (15)
Black gum Nyssa sylvatica 3,200(5)
Sugarberry Celtis laevigata 3,200(5)
American elm Ulmus americana 6,300(15)
Sweetbay magnolia Magnolia virginiana 3,200(5)
Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana 3,200(5)
TOTAL 60,200
Final distribution and densities will be reported in the detailed mitigation plan.
4.2 GRADING PLAN
Existing ditches are very stable conveyances except for minor areas of bank erosion.
Prior to planting, soils will be ripped in linear bands perpendicular to the direction of
surface water flows. The established micro-topography on leveled surfaces will promote
diffuse flow and surface water storage. In addition, subsurface hardpans may be
eliminated to promote vegetation growth/survival and to increase groundwater recharge
rates. All vegetative buffers will be a minimum of 50 feet in width.
4.3 FERTILIZATION PLAN
No fertilization activities are proposed for the Site. The application of fertilizers may
compound water quality degradation within onsite and downstream receiving waters.
4.4 PROJECT PHASING
A tentative phasing schedule for the proposed project is presented below:
Task Description
Task 1 Environmental Screening (CE Document)
Task 2 Conservation Easement Recorded
Task 3 Develop Approved Restoration Plan
Task 4 Mitigation Site Earthwork
Task 5 Site Planting
Install Monitoring Equipment
Task 6 Prepare Mitigation Plan and As Built Drawings
Task 7 Submit Year 1 Monitoring Report
Task 8 Submit Year 2 Monitoring Report
Task 9 Submit Year 3 Monitoring Report
Task 10 Submit Year 4 Monitoring Report
Task 11 Submit Year 5 Monitoring Report
Weeks from
Contract Execution
5
36
37
35*
35*
70*
70*
Dec. after implementation
Dec.- 2 yrs after implementation
Dec.- 3 yrs after implementation
Dec.- 4 yrs after implementation
Dec.- 5 yrs after implementation
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Restoration Plan (Contract #002280)
Page 4
" Time frame is dependent upon seasonal conditions at completion of Site implementation.
4.5 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA
The Monitoring Plan ensures vegetation growth and survival. Monitoring of restoration
efforts will be performed for 5 years or until success criteria are fulfilled.
Vegetation monitoring will follow the 2006 CVS-EEP Vegetation Monitoring Protocol set
forth by EEP (Lee et al. 2006). After planting has been completed, an initial evaluation
will be performed to verify planting methods and to determine initial species composition
and density. Supplemental planting and additional Site modifications will be
implemented, if necessary.
During quantitative vegetation sampling between June 1 and September 31 of the first
year, 10-meter by 10-meter square sample plots will be randomly placed within the Site.
In each sample plot, vegetation sampling will follow Levels 1-2 CVS-EEP sampling
methods (Lee et al. 2006).
Vegetation Success Criteria
Success criteria have been established to verify that the vegetation component supports
community elements necessary for forest development. Success criteria are dependent
upon the density and growth of characteristic forest species. An average density of 320
stems per acre must be surviving after five monitoring years.
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site Page 5
Restoration Plan (Contract #002280)
5.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.0. North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North
Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2007a. Final North Carolina Water
Quality Assessment and Impaired Waters List (2006 Integrated 305(b) and
303(d) Report) (online).
Available:http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdl/documents/303d_Report.pdf [November 10, 2008].
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh,
North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2007b. Redbook, Surface Waters
and Wetlands Standards. North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2008a. Draft North Carolina Water
Quality Assessment and Impaired Waters List (2008 Integrated 305(b) and
303(d) Report). Public Review (online). Available:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdl/documents/B.Draft2008303dList.pdf. [November 10, 2008].
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh,
North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2008b. Draft Basinwide Planning
Program: Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan - June 2008. North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North
Carolina.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,
Division of Parks and Recreation, N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1989. Soil Survey of Craven County,
North Carolina. Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site Page 6
Restoration Plan (Contract #002280)
I
1
41
r185_...? 1 :4 _ .
i
-S?
-9Y LL i tia- ?+_.
i
' _ I (I' i ir .,ice
1-
1-.`
r
I f&D
BM p
X8.6 AT
owers
{ i ti ? 1 i 7oC-?,
7.4
I
Site Boundary
- ?•
35.19627 N -77.38060 W
re_v /
Overview Map
'258
25
70
Directions (From Kinston):c° j
. " I 25
Take 70 East from Kinston. Travel approximately 8 miles to the
Eo?:;
Dover exit off of 70. Follow Old 70/Wilson Street approximately
4.3 miles East. Turn Right over the railroad tracks to a wire gate.
Restoration Systems, LLC Figure 1:
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211 Heath Riparian Buffer
Raleigh, NC 27604 Site Mitigation Site 1:24,000 N
tel: [phone] Location Craven County, NC 0 470 940 1,880 2,820 3.760
Feet
i
00020202080010 FA
EEP,�argeted watershed. 11111
PER I
Site ii- located within th
jq— �t
�'j/`i�
Heath Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Site
RESTORATION - , ', • - • ,
SYSTEMS,LL( Craven County, NC

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Figure 3:
g
Heath Riparian Buffer
Raleigh, NC 27604
Soils
Mitigation Site
1:5,000 N
tel: [phone]
Craven County, NC
0 95 190 350 51-0 Iso
Feet

EO Existing Ditches
Site Boundary (60.632 acres)

Y?1
f.

?r

?
y y ax

Y

ll
A

Al,

Yd '0O "4'•b a COW O 11l11f1•VJ
6 E ° zZ 8
d D 4 w b
_ ggq r $
All y oz
1-4 U
?7 W??i??`-?c?d8 ~ £ z=a W ?W c?11 rcrr11tttt''Y?? ? I[I[{? ?
j`\\ I I I I, I I I I 1 1 1 I l i a I ? 1 1 1 1 , I I I I I I? I? LLL ?? '?ZWZ ?1 a ?
Gl \\\\ ( (? a?V?c yy?? (?m 8 Upy O)V I' I' W O
\ ( 4 ? ?????e2WISQ2
12
g<?? X W ief'?fN\\ W r-, z
n Q9gy
j.A
on
F
_ z
MIN IM _ \ \
Qtv"
8 3CZu !tN \
qra s/N
\?4
BF•CS.g,
o N
a?=? °a w a
gsg " °°
??C N z m m
Hal
=V VI FFF11l? O22?ZQQZ Yl
Ell
J o "s r ?
- ?m„
?UN
S? 3f/ ! f? Cf
c g •OC. .??- MOO ?
3 tmaa" N
-
aT NN I T
?8s88 t a i
X888 af`
-'h -7co
cc-
???? lay ?- .; hyo ? / mza f ?? w :Z;•a? W N ?:*
j E4
41 A 11F
®???? "s `a z§"g gas€< ?f
r
ilra
Me F F ' rah o ° 3
NE"
F gas ? 8 ? ? ? ? P ?r''%
Sg$ ? ? `" ° " ``eta ................
? ? ? ?' ??SSS? ? ?? w? ?19jyy$}{ ? Z?W poi ^?.i ?? ? s ? - ? iESS?"s G -?•o??J °?;.?0= a,
Z?p r^ !'??y` <m< E?ao °°co 2° t G °, Y.. aQl
y, ? o
\
5$ set ' LL§Y S $23• ?•?. v'a ?.?
tt O LL, yr
E? $ s + ?LL o It
r.` rg=°a o ? <?ES g'€ d?" ?P?°.•?? pp
- ?1 S t c u Y E u `?2 ?gg'•` u a° .'. o° o = S € $c° /?'•..........••',?`` M 1IaAA
N
W
O
O
T
a
a
Appendix A
(Figures)
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site Page 7
Restoration Plan (Contract #002280)
r?
Eka°gs ee
m nt
,.C)GRAM
EEP Floodplain Requirements Checklist
This form was developed by the National Flood Insurance program, NC Floodplain
Mapping program and Ecosystem Enhancement Program to be filled for all EEP projects.
The form is intended to summarize the floodplain requirements during the design phase
of the projects. The form should be submitted to the Local Floodplain Administrator
with three copies submitted to NFIP (attn. Edward Curtis), NC Floodplain Mapping Unit
(attn. John Gerber) and NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
Project Location
Name of project: Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Name if stream or feature: Unnamed tributaries to Core Creek
County: Craven
Name of river basin: Neuse 03020202080010
Is project urban or rural? rural
Name of Jurisdictional
municipality/county: Craven County
DFIRM panel number for
entire site: 4582
Consultant name: Barrett Jenkins
Phone number: 919-334.9118
Address: 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
Heath Buffer FEMA_Floodplain_Checklist-1 Page 1 of 4
Design Information
Restoration Systems, L.L.C. has contracted with EEP (FDP contract #002280) through the Full
Delivery Process (RFP 916-001383) to provide 60 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units through the
completion of the Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (Site) located approximately 3.4 miles
southeast of Dover in Craven County. The Site encompasses 60.632-acres of land, which has
been ditched and cleared for row crop production. The Site is situated along unnamed tributaries
to Core Creek, a major tributary to the Ncuse River. The Site is located within DWQ sub-basin
03-04-08 of the Neuse River Basin and is encompassed within USGS 14-digit Hydrologic Unit
and Targeted Local Watershed 03020202080010. The primary goals of this buffer restoration
project focus on improving water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring aquatic and
riparian habitat. Restoration activities include recording of a permanent conservation easement
and reforestation of Site. There are no stream or wetland restoration components to the project,
only buffer restoration.
Floodplain Information
Is project located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)?
C) Yes G, No
If project is located in a SFHA, check how it was determined:
r Redelineation
U Detailed Study
C Limited Detail Study
Ci Approximate Study
Ci Don't know
List flood zone designation:
Check if applies:
C"i AE Zone
0 Floodway
C, Non-Encroachment
i?'!` None
r7 A Zone
0 Local Setbacks Required
0' No Local Setbacks Required
If local setbacks are required, list how many feet:
Heath Buffer FEMA Floodplain Checklist- I Page 2 of 4
Does proposed channel boundary encroach outside floodway/non-
encroachment/setbacks?
0 Yes G No
Land Acquisition (Check)
State owned (fee simple)
Conservation easment (Design Bid Build)
[-1 Conservation Easement (Full Delivery Project)
Note: if the project property is state-owned, then all requirements should be addressed to
the Department of Administration, State Construction Office (attn: Herbert Neily,
919)807-4101)
Is community/county participating in the NFIP program?
lrv Yes 0 No
Note: if community is not participating, then all requirements should be addressed to
NFIP attn: Edward Curtis, 919) 715-8000 x369)
Name of Local Floodplain Administrator: Chad Strawn
Phone Number: 252 636 6618
Floodplain Requirements
This section to be filled by designer/applicant following verification with the LFPA
[Ri No Action
r No Rise
r7 Letter of Map Revision
i Conditional Letter ofMap Revision
El Other Requirements
List other requirements:
Comments:
Heath Buffer FEMA Floodplain_ Checklist-1 Page 3 of 4
Name: _1?arr c! rwcGC+IaS _ Signature:
Title:
? r Date:
Vickis Thicket FEMA Floodplain_Checklist-1 Page 4 of 4
0) lcb L5 00-6-4