090185_Inspection_20200729

, ram-S--s 'v
" oivisioneof Water Resources
Facility Number 7 1 - /�� 0
1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7-7t" Arrival Time: ,'pC5 Departure Time:Ii , County: N.,a - Region: Fj -O
Farm Name: R .-J .fJ fry Owner`Email:
Owner Name: L ,`- jam. , Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �j� L i`% /� Title: Z2G6.//j r/ Phone:
Onsite Representative: ���_ Integrator: �`'/
Certified Operator: Certification Number: /�302
Back-up Operator: `1,'h u e y j 0-7 Certification Number: //,o / �S'
Location of Farm: ' Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design °Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 76-0 --o Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish f_f_57? 3 - - .. Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean 9 Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D - Pout Ca,aci Po 1 Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish 11113E -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other El Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 l< 0 NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I21 l< ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - /03 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): `
Observed Freeboard(in): /r _
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or enviro ental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes I2K ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Erl< ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Types)
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ErN< ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes []'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes Q"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers blather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield 20 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ago
❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 9- - / j Date of Inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: -
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes L9 1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 12 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes d o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes lagc ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �To�❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
now L� s I
f/
0,1') .8'70(//1-2— R
Aar d GIs -1 h/ �-�- ;� :r ,,-
r am:i Trs ni y D or`
ufi rDa"� r— c 'a I �r1 . L6i-
7
p/91-,5 r'
(i^dt 1-�1�7/L..' uffjJl PLC!/ ' ' �� v'7r �..3
Reviewer/Inspector Name: S' ;;„. Phone: "-fjj--63—d/3--1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 9�� -"
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015