20100684 Ver 1_401 Application_20100810

-IMeGM
A S S 0 C I A T E S
August 17, 2010
Mr. Steve Chapin
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
COSY
F I
2 0 1 0 0 6 8 4
EE'4@mowf?Dul
AUG 1,9 2010
CE,NR - WATER OVAL11 Y
Vt I MUS AND STOR'n' s 1 ER SRAKK
RE: Pre-Construction Notification
Foothills Commerce Center - Phase One
Cleveland County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Chapin:
Please find attached the Pre-Construction Notification package for the proposed Foothills
Commerce Center - Phase One on Artee Road in Cleveland County for review. The Owner is
proposing to construct a business development center in multiple phases as interested businesses
step forward. The project site is divided by Little Beaverdam Creek; the east side is currently
being farmed and the west side has been forested. A creek crossing consisting of a 60-inch
HDPE pipe with endwalls and fill for a road and utilities is proposed in the first phase of this
project and is shown on Sheet C-113. A second creek crossing consisting of a 12-inch ductile
iron sanitary sewer line will be installed as shown on Sheet C-112.
Please contact Becky Johnson or me if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
McGILL ASSOCIATES, P.A.
RHONDA H. HONEYCUTT, El
Engineering Associate
Enclosures
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ 401/Wetlands Unit (w/ enclosures)
Mr. Rick Howell, City of Shelby (w/ enclosures)
Mr. Dale Pennell, PE, McGill Associates, P.A.
P:\2009\09.00116\Letters\USACE-sc 17aug 10. docx
E n g i n e e r i n g . P l a n n i n g F i n a n c e
McGill Associates, P.A. • P.O. Box 2259, Asheville, 'v'C 28802 • 55 Broad Streel, Asheville, NC 28801
828-252-0575 • Fax: [phone]
2 0 1 4 0 68 4
O?rO?? \NATFR?G
lU
o -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes N No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ? No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Foothills Commerce Center - Phase One
2b. County: Cleveland lit { .
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Shelby
2d. Subdivision name: N/A 11a
t
31 L/
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state

project no: N/A

14?r ?'FVt?. "2'r
r
?v
3. Owner Information 31•.r??A(/?.
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: City of Shelby
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 1568/935
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: 300 South Lafayette Street
3e. City, state, zip: Shelby, North Carolina 28151
3f. Telephone no.: [phone] x6585
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Dale Pennell, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable): McGill Associates, P.A.
5c. Street address: 55 Broad Street
5d. City, state, zip: Asheville, North Carolina 28801
5e. Telephone no.: [phone] x114
5f. Fax no.: [phone]
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 6-1001 16
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.30645 Longitude: - 81.60938
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 152.129 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Little Beaverdam Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Broad
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site is currently farmed; neighboring uses include industrial, agricultural, residential, and forest.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.0 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
2,525 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The site will be developed into a commerce center of light industrial uses to increase employment opportunities in the
area.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Earthmoving and paving equipment will be used in Phase One. Future phases will include building construction
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: See attached report.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained forJ ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ® Yes ? No
6b. If yes, explain.
Phase One includes utility installation and road construction. Future phase(s) will include any necessary utility and/or road
extensions and building construction, but no impact to jurisdictional waters are anticipated.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ®P ? T Creek Crossing Little Beaverdam ® PER ® Corps 5 125
for road Creek ? INT ? DWQ
S2 ®P ? T Creek Crossing Little Beaverdam ® PER ® Corps 5 20
for utility Creek ? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 145
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose
number of pond
I Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Flooded I Filled I Excavated I Flooded I Filled I Excavated I Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number - Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temporarv (T) impact
B1 ?P?T
B2 ?P?T
B3 ?P?T
6i. Comments:
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
? Catawba ? Randleman
6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
? Yes
? No
? Yes
? No
? Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The project was designed so that only one crossing was required for most of the utilities and road access (separate crossing
for sewershed across ridge).
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Erosion control will be stressed on this project.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater.Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? (at buildout) 32.7 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Phase Two NPDES is not yet in effect in
this area.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 8of10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes
? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer is directed to the City of Shelby WWTF.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?

Raleigh
?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS - Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Cleveland
County, NC (http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.htmi)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Fishery Management Council - South Atlantic Ecosystem IMS
(http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh-coral/ims/viewer.htm)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Office of State Archaeology (http://www.archaeology.gov/ncarch/articles/articles.htm)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM 3710252700J, effective February 20, 2008
i ieK

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name licant/Agent's Si nit r Date
(Agent's sign ure is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4 S S '; ( 1 -', I F
1?r°elir riarax j Site Assessment; Wetlands aErd Other VVat:ers of the i n'ted States
For the Proposed Foothills Conrrn°rer•ce Center
Sponsoned by the City of Shelby and Cleveland Courbty
September 2:5, -21009
1rt try dIled'):n
The proposed site is located west of Shelby, just off of highway US 74 and can be accessed from
Artee Road (SR 1314) and Plato Lee Road (SR 1310. The properly location is indicated in the
attached parcel neap 6-100 Block 1 lot 16 and as outlined on the attached aerial photo of [lie area.
The attached prospective site development plan also shows the parcel with a potential layout of
the commerce center, including building footprints and roads. The property area is just over 152
acres. This preliminary site assessment is provided in accordance with North Carolina's current
Certified Industi-ial Site guidelines and represents a general waters and wetlands review of the
property without a detailed delineation. However, the available topographic map of the site
provides a good basis for mapping the approximate location of the drainage features on the site
that represent areas that would likely be jurisdictional under Federal Clean Water Act provisions.
Site Description
The current property site use is predominately row crop agriculture. Soy beans are the current
crop being grown on the site. The planted area is clearly indicated on the attached aerial photo.
This portion of the project has been under row crop management for some time. The topography
of the site is relatively flat with low rolling hills within the site. The small wooded (low growing
vines, shrubs and small to medium size trees) "fingers" extending into the soy bean field
represent small drainage features on the site that have relatively deep, eroded channels that carry
site drainage toward established streams. The area of the site along Artee Road slopes generally
fi-om north to south with a small "ridge line" that divides the agricultural portion of the site
roughly in half with the eastern portion draining generally eastward to an unnamed tributary of
Little Beaver Dam Creek and the western portion toward Little Beaver Dam Creek.
The portion of the property west of Little Beaver- Darn Creek that is bordered on the west by
Plato Lee Road is wooded with a series of old unmaintained roads and trails. The property
slopes from west to east, draining toward Little Beaver Darn Creek.
The one named stream on the site, referenced above as Little Beaver Dam Creek, runs north to
south and bisects the property along the western boundary of the "main" part of the site (property
to the east is agricultural use). The stream is marked on the attached maps. This is clearly a
" water° of the US" and any fill or modification of the strearn would require a Cleats Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the Corps of Engineers and a Section 401 Certification fi-om the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality. The proposed site plan shows a prospective crossing of a
site road that may require permitting. This type of "fill" is considered a nunor impact and can be
1-, "- 1 n 1, i- i !1 t?
permitted tluougl? a General Permit and Ce2-tification process that is relatively simple. The final
project development plan may also use alternate access and eliminate the crossing or use
construction practices that bridge the stream from "high ground to high ground" avoiding any
permit requirements.
Sttc Rec onTiMss'ance
On September 23, 2009, the writer perfori-ned a site reconnaissance visit to the property to
confirm the infon-nation available for this site concerning wetlands and waters that may be on the
proper-t y.
The site is well elevated above the per;rranent streams on or near the site. The "tirngers" of
vegetated areas externding into the row crop are drainage features and are clearly not "yvaters of
the US_- Bused on cun-errt jurisdictional guidelines, these features sire not regulated under
Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act. Final site development plans WOUld include
conlurniation of this with the appropriate regulatory agencies, but there is no obvious evidence
that any of these f eatlnres are waters or contain wetlands.
Within the portion of the property west of Little Beaver- Dam Creek, the wooded area contains
only one weak drainage feature that is clearly only a drainage feature and doesn't contain
wetlands or -waters.
Little Beaver Dam Creek that generally divides the property between the wooded portion and the
agricultural portion is, as noted, a stream that would be regulated tinder the Clean Water Act.
The stream is deeply incised and the surface of the water flow is well below the bank area along
the creek. The stream corridor is thickly vegetated with invasive vine species and contains many
shrubs and. trees of various sizes and age. The adjacent topography shows no indication of
wetland areas or areas where wetlands typically form. Stream banks are steep and the channel
well below riparian land area. The site has been "cut over" in recent years for timber harvest. It
was noted that an adjacent parcel along Plato Lee Road has recently been logged. Due to the
extremely thick vegetation, the actual stream channel and associated bank would have to be field
located during site development and grading to protect the stream area and avoid encroacInuent
into jurisdictional areas. The Creek forns the western property boundary for the main portion of
the property and the preliminary site plan shows the maintenance of a planted buffer along the
property line and stream. No "fill" or "modification" of the stream is planned along this area and
the one crossing is currently planned within the section of Little Beaver Dam Creek that crosses
the site is discussed in the Site Description of this report. Permitting of this impact if necessary
should pose no significant regulatory concern.
It should also be noted that a sewer easement 40 feet wide runs along Beaver Dam Creek and its
presence would prohibit certain types of Construction or modification in this easement area as
weR
The north end of the eastern boundary of the property runs along Metrolina Drive along high
gr-otrnd and is adjacent to the soy bean field. The south end of the eastern bounndary runs along a
prominent drainage feature. This unnamed tributary to Little Beaver Darn Creek is a stream and
wcu.ld be jurisdictional ,vatcrs of the US and subject to the requirements of the 'lean Water Act.
The stream corridor is wooded and the stream meanders along this property line. 1v1o
development cf this area is planned and the preliminary site plan shows a planted buffer along
the creek. The stream charnel is very deep and incised with bigb banks and no adjacent low
areas ?vfiere wetlands typically fon-n. No wetland areas or areas wliere wetlands may forni were
present along this stream corridor. This stream is more accessible on the east bank of the
channel and has a more mature wooded riparian area. The stream corridor vvouid need to be field
located at the time of site development and marked to ;hake sure there is no eiir_roac111iieiit or
impact tbat would require perni1tting under the Clean Water Act or NC Water Quality Rules. All
sniall drainage features that extended into the soy bean field and that drained into the uiuiamed
trilnjtary >>?ere clearly not waters of the L1S and not currently regulated under current guidelines.

The site has limited jurisdictional waters as noted and development plans show only one area
wliere regulatory permitting allay be required. The site assessment did not detect ?s?etlands or
areas wbere wetlands typically form and there Nvas no obvious evidence that these features
existed on the site. Stream areas that are considered jurisdictional have been noted. This site can
certainly be planned, engineered and developed witli minimal impact to water quality in the
Tittle Beaver Dam Creek drainage. Pet-niitting of the very limited proposed impact is well within
notarial regulatory process.
Prepared by
,"Forrest R. Westall, Sr., F.E.
McGill Associates
Cleo eland Cn.. NC -- Printable l lap hup: ?I-CiI11S?.NN t1ogis.tlet 1x On eland priniable.asp:'prOCess=id??-?-'=
(:Ievelal'16 Co, I C",
Parcels
GIS Owner: CITY OF SHELBY
GIS Owner2:
GIS Geed Reference: 1568-935
GIS Deeded acres: 152.129
Calculated Acres: 150.16374377
Parcel fro.: 28764
Parcel Address(es):
ARTEE RD
Parcel Owner;
CITY OF SHELBY
300 S LAFAYETTE ST
SHELBY IJC 28151-0207
Map: 6-100 Block: 1 Lot: 16
Deed Reference: Bk. 1568 Pg 935
Land Area: 152.129 acres
Tax Values:
Building Value: $0
Land Value. $716,405
Total Value, $716,405
Other Attributes
at Point 1221732 575782

?le?eland Co.. NC -- Primable Map
School Districts:
Elementary: SPRINGIIIORE ELEMENTARY
Intermediate.
Middle: CREST MIDDLE SCHOOL
High. CREST HIGH SCHOOL
Zonincg:
Class: LI Light Industrial
Municipality: CITY OF SHELBY
Floeci Zones-
Zone Cod&0
Panel Number: 3710252700J
20', E Fr tore Land Use,
Use. ETJ AREA
Jt riS6*tC io1-iaf Llrr^btts:
Name: SHELBY - E T J
VoVnq Precincts:
Precinct Lattimore
hrr},: 'arcims=.??-ebQis.net%nc'ele?eland'prinrable.a?p`'ptacess=rd?4;.x?=
NO louse and Senate Districts:
Senate: 46th Senate
Legis.. 112th House
Fire Districts:
District Number 7
2000 Census Tracts:
Census Tract 951300
\Yatersheds:
Zone. NONE
i Historica! tnve-,tong:
None
Son! Types:
Soil Type: PbB2
MCLAIMER: The information contained on this site is furnished by government and private industry sources and is
believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed. l0apping information is a representation of various data sources
and is not a subsitute for information that would result from an accurate land survey The information contained hereon,
does not replace information that may be obtained by consulting the information's official source. In no event shall
Cleveland County, NC or the consultants of Cleveland County, NC be liable for any damages, direct or consequential,
from the use of the information contained on this site
httpJlwvvw webgis net Anderson & Associates. Inc http.lha^hn,.andassoc com

CleN eland Co.. NC -- Printable Map
hmpi arcims?.web i .net tic cle\elsnd l rintahle.a p':'prnce,?=t?ioeii...
4a?eve['and'' CO-, WC
N
DISCLAlIVIER: The information contained on this site is furnished by government and private industry sources and is
believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed Mapping information is a representation of various data sources
and is not a subsitute for information that would result from an accurate land survey The information contained hereon
does not replace information that may be obtained by consulting the information's official source. In no event shall
Cleveland County, NC or the consultants of Cleveland County, 11,1C be liable for any damages, direct or consequential,
front the use of the informaiion confained on this site
htiG 1Jvv\, VJ w'ebgis net kideison u' =sscclaies la_ ht1p./Av,mvr. and2ssoc GCim
u ;rl _m),1 If) ?_1 "?N
I.
?? I
v
I I
I'i?l u i l - I I ? I
J _ I I r ? 'I ' _ 1y ?;; a
o
_ l 4 ,J it o
? I
r?aui
' ?? it `"?\ ?? 4x\ U? ,. ? ??>ii _r......?..- ___ '`•I?
S ' 1
k-3 I O
? \`'?? ? \?? IiA ? ,°'y??? ?rN`. ?ga? l3? F.?t1l?? Imo' y? ?I
e
1- -
Ilk
1 I I --. - f?f 1
,,d u
i- ;
--
r ! ? 1, ? i - ? II