090166_Inspection_20191217

-\vv — o7 --- —/oL 7 ',"
vision of Water Resources
Facility Number - J ,4, 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: CrCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: /9-/7_/5' Arrival Time: ` Departure Time: 'f cj County: 74 Region:!
Farm Name: &oc k -i Zeta—el )v( r Owner Email:
Owner Name: Ctaofr-j Trlrr.J 4 f*7 .2 yc• Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
•
Facility Contact: 4-e--e (� Le Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: , Integrator: �'
1
Certified Operator: / Certification Number: /176 I
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle • Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish •Layer Dairy Cow
YWean to Feeder b9,0 63TV Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers _ Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys -
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there.evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes la< ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e' - Date of Inspection: /;2—/?--, /.7
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): /
Observed Freeboard(in): 2-4, -
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Et<To ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Ia-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ErCes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes a N ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [i]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): je" lei
13. Soil Type(s): /,�J/.Z�j/`/1�•� / 24,lto
14.Do the receiving cropsvddiffer from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 1211 N El NA El NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? esNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Q110 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
❑'4�aste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard aste Analysis of Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking [a e op field El 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Q1i ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes, 0-56 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: et-- G• Date of Inspection: /p/7 J�}
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes dNoJ ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes LE1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑-1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? es jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
51401ffely7 dt/t ;6/
GIVHD LU 5ee_ C mod+ F _' Zoo--- a10 w c-� u Tle 7�,
(Lg./ /V D vatrve u0436-- iGdp 6- -//l7 ; -v /9-
avtrr �Be �
Reviewer/Inspector Name: "'epl 7-e-( -L— Phone: 7fp:v 3- /67
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
, Date:
�7 2z /9
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015