090156_Inspection_20190719

2,33;W7
erbivWon of Water Resources
°Facility Number 9- =0 Division of Soil and Water Conservations °
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: O'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ®'patine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7_/� ?Arrival Time: Jet 'r Do Departure Time: /a;7) County: ,X ,��....- Region:
Farm Name: ate,/;17- / .5 .EnG, Owner Email:
Owner Name: ,5 Pi.,i y ���GZ — Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: /3c 7/73c EGro^ "ck Title: � �jfo r.. Phone:
Onsite Representative: 6'�ti� / Integrator: A4 rhpi
Certified Operator: '�-' '- � � Certification Number: )
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
qe Design Current _ ' Design Current '° Design', Current
Swine Capacity ;Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle. _Capacity 'Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
"'feeder to Finish 31.D o ,�34ft) - Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current ,. Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca"'aci ° Po rn. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish 1111MME Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers Beef Feeder
Boars El Pullets --, Beef Brood Cow
Other a •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes a< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA El NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ Now ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®fi_(o/ ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ego ❑ NA El NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: G - !Date of Inspection: 7-/9s--p`7/ "
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes • No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): j 9
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 110 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes do ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes la1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do.any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [21 To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): (20/w
13.Soil Type(s): (,f1
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes EEi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [a1 To ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes El iQo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Qlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes []N ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No, ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Wee y Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Q Io ❑'NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes i o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 9- - A5 4. Date of Inspection: /--O0/9
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑'Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document 0 Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes la<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ETo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes u No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ErN/o ❑ NA Li NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? El Yes [a'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to questions#):Explain any YES,answers"and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments."
Use drawings of facility to'sbetter explain situations'(ase additional pages as necessary):"
�{) •M' T eth B "�%f1-rCovr-d-`e-r-ip) " Les '' ff
n-
foie , - Try" Gown cry.
frix4 of ;S � �w iZ is
TAB- �'/`r N© Cr�/�vizl� J�z-G��'� i s- y�ut�'
800k
yaw Lv,d, ' � �' > ��' 7L5 7- /z9vo'.` e279 14 (.7;fik/0 , -..1P(///7
hit 4 "ro- .777 /72 ,
G um gl.° l9-
& ems; �
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �j�c.-� Cam- Z Z--- Phone: 9/ 30 /&"'j
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 7 J m, V9
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015