20170110 Ver 2_Year 3 Monitoring Report 2020 Draft_20201203

ID#* 20170110 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 12/03/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal-12/3/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes a No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer W Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Raymond Holz
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20170110
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Weaver Farm
County: Wayne
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version: *2
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: 2017-0110v2 Draft Weaver Yr. 3 2020 Monitoring
33.63MB
Report.pdf
Rease upload only one R]Fcf the corrplete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:*

YEAR 3 (2020) MONITORING REPORT
Weaver Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project #: 2017-0110v2
Neuse River Basin
In Agreement with:
The Weaver Farm Mitigation Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits Pursuant to the
Neuse Nutrient Management Strategy
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
PREPARED BY:
And
December 2020
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC
DWR) this Annual Monitoring Report for the Weaver Farm Bank Parcel (Parcel). Restoration Systems
(Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC DWR) this Annual
Monitoring Report for the Weaver Farm Bank Parcel (Parcel). As agreed, in the Weaver Farm Mitigation
Banking Instrument, made and entered into on July 7th, 2017 by Restoration Systems, LLC, (RS) acting as
Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division
of Water Resources (DWR).
Success criteria have been established to verify that the vegetation component supports community
elements necessary for forest development. Success criteria within the buffer and nutrient offset
restoration areas will be based on the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre after
five years of monitoring.
During year 3 (2020), vegetation was monitored during April and October. The April data provided a
baseline for the supplemental planting that occurred during the winter of 2019/2020, and the October
data serves as the Year 3 (2020) monitoring data. Year 3 (2020) stems densities averaged 513 planted
hardwood stems per acre (excluding livestakes), with twenty-one of the twenty-two plots meeting success
criteria (Table 8, Appendix Q. Additionally, all three temporary transects met success criteria, with an
average of 526 stems per acre (Table 7, Appendix C).
No signs of herbivory, easement encroachment, mowing, pruning, or mulching were observed.
Additionally, minimal invasive species were observed on the Parcel.
Given the apparent success of RS' 2020 remedial action plan and replanting, no additional remedial work
is proposed for 2021.
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Report Executive Summary
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES.........................................................................1
1.1.
Location and Setting.....................................................................................................................1
1.2.
Project Goals and Objectives........................................................................................................ 1
2.0
MITIGATION POTENTIAL...................................................................................................................2
3.0
MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA.............................................................................................2
3.1.
Monitoring Protocol...................................................................................................................... 2
3.2.
Success Criteria............................................................................................................................. 3
4.0
MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY.................................................................................................3
5.0
REFERENCES......................................................................................................................................5
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Site Location Map and Background Tables
Figure 1. Site Location and Service Area
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information & Attributes
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Component and Asset
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6. Planted and Total Stems by Plot and Species
Appendix D. Remedial Activities
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Report
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS
Executive Summary
Restoration Systems, LLC

1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC
DWR) this Annual Monitoring Report for the Weaver Farm Bank Parcel (Parcel). As agreed, in the Weaver
Farm Mitigation Banking Instrument, made and entered into on July 7th, 2017 by Restoration Systems, LLC,
(RS) acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR).
1.1. Location and Setting
The Parcel is located approximately 2.1 miles northeast of Grantham in Wayne County, NC. (Figure 1,
Appendix A). The Parcel is within the Neuse River Basin in the 14-digit United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Cataloging Unit 03020201170010 of the South Atlantic/Gulf Region (North Carolina Division of
Water Quality [NCDWQ] Sub -basin Number 03-04-12) (Figure 1, Appendix A).
Latitude: 35°18'16.01"N, Longitude: 78' 7'44.27"W
Directions to Parcel:
- Take 1-40 East out of Raleigh,
- Take Exit 341 for NC-50/NC-55 toward US-13/Newton Grove,
- At the traffic circle (1.3 miles), take the 4th exit onto US-13 N,
- 9.4 Miles Turn Left onto Weaver Rd.,
- 0.7 Miles Turn Right at Angie Drive,
- The Parcel is located on the left.
1.2. Project Goals and Objectives
The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas are improving water quality, enhancing
flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat by creating a forested riparian buffer adjacent to stream
channels and a forested riparian area along agricultural ditches. These goals will be accomplished by the
following.
1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production, including a)
ceasing the broadcast application of fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural materials into and
adjacent to Site surface water conveyances, and b) providing a restored buffer to filter runoff from
adjacent lands.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by reducing bank erosion,
vegetation maintenance, and agricultural land disturbances.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters crossing Site
floodplains.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively developed for agricultural
production.
6. Restoring and re-establishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity.
7. Protecting the Parcel's riparian buffer functions and values in perpetuity
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Page 1
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
The removal of livestock had immediate benefits to the Parcel's drainage features 1-3. Flushing flows
established a new top of bank within these features. Planting of the new "benches" occurred during
reforestation efforts. The revised top of bank was measured during as -built survey work and used to
generate as -built credit calculations. Additionally, the final easement boundary was slightly adjusted along
the southern boundary of Feature's 1 and 2's origin; approximately 20 feet was added to the easement in
the section above the proposed boundary detailed in the Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP). These
two factors resulted in a slightly higher mitigation potential than initially documented in the BPDP.
The DWR has determined the nitrogen nutrient abatement of restored riparian area to be 2,273.02 lbs. per
acre. Riparian buffer credits will be measured by the hundredth of an acre and converted into square feet.
Per the as -built survey, the conservation easement measures 22.81 acres and includes 21.53 acres of
restored riparian area. Of the restored riparian area, 15.37 acres will generate nutrient offset credit,
generating 34,936.31 lbs. of nitrogen offset credit. 6.16 acres of the restored riparian area will generate
268,329.6 sq. ft. of Neuse River riparian buffer credits. Riparian buffer mitigation generated via restoration
can be used for either Neuse River riparian buffer credits or nutrient offset credits, but not both. IRS must
request and receive approval from DWR to transfer any mitigation credits between riparian buffer and
nutrient offset. All mitigation credit assets shall be shown on the credit ledgers. The Parcel's mitigation
potential is detailed in Table 1 (Appendix A).
3.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA
3.1. Monitoring Protocol
Restoration monitoring procedures for riparian vegetation will include periodic visual inspection and
annual plant survival and species diversity survey reports. Quantitative sampling of vegetation will be
performed as outlined in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008).
Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. All
planted stems in the plots will be marked with flagging tape and recorded. Detailed qualitative and
quantitative monitoring is proposed for vegetated riparian areas and is to -be -reported annually.
Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled.
Restoration Systems shall submit an annual monitoring report to DWR no later than December 31st of each
year. Quantitative monitoring includes 22 10x10 meter permanent vegetation plots (2.0% of riparian buffer
mitigation and nutrient offset credit areas). Plots were randomly placed throughout the planted riparian
areas and are representative of credit generating areas. Sampling of vegetation will be performed in the
Fall of each year; monitoring data can be found in Appendix C.
Vegetation will receive a cursory, visual evaluation periodically to ascertain the degree of overtopping of
planted elements by nuisance species. A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion fencing will also be
performed each year to confirm:
• Fencing is in good condition throughout the Site,
• No cattle access within the conservation easement area,
• No encroachment has occurred,
• Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservations easement area, and
• There has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would negatively
affect the function of the buffer.
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Page 2
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

3.2. Success Criteria
Success criteria within the riparian buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas will be based on the survival
of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre after five years of monitoring. A minimum of four
native, hardwood tree and shrub species must be present, with no one species representing greater than
50% of the stems. In addition, appropriate volunteer stems of native hardwood tree and shrub species may
be included to meet the final performance standard of 260 stems per acre upon DWR approval.
4.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY
2018 Maintenance Summarv:
Between the initial planting and Yr. 1(2018) monitoring, no active maintenance occurred on the Parcel.
In September of 2018, approximately 20-25 inches of rain fell over a three to four -day period from
Hurricane Florence, resulting in complete inundation of the Parcel for nearly a week. Based on site -
specific indicators (high-water marks and debris racks in trees), as much as 6-feet of water covered the
project. Hurricane Florence's impact was assumed to be the main contributor to the poor survival of
planted hardwood stems during Year 1 (2018) monitoring efforts — completed in October of 2018. A
remedial action plan was developed as part of the Year 1 (2018) Monitoring Report and approved by
DWR staff via email (Appendix D). IRS implemented the remedial action plan in 2019.
2019 Maintenance Summary;
On February 24t", 2019, IRS completed a remedial plant effort (Appendix D), which included;
• The planting of 8,500 bare -root stems within two different planting zones,
• The broadcast application of permanent herbaceous seed mix (red top grass mix) for better weed
control,
Herbicide treatment for control of dense prickly sida (Sida rhombifolia) and dogfennel
(Eupatorium capillifolium) and,
In the location of the former poultry houses, IRS disc the Parcel to incorporate lime and to break
up soil compaction from the removed buildings.
DWR and IRS staff conducted a field verification of the replanting effort in April of 2019. IRS, along with
DWR staff, were unable to locate an abundance of living, planted stems. The survey triggered IRS to
begin a robust evaluation of the Parcel to determine how planted stems from the initial planting (Dec.
2017) and the remedial planting (Feb. 2019) were faring; further surveys indicated planted stems were
struggling to establish and visual mortality of planted stems was near 80%.
To further investigate the mortality issues, IRS conducted multiple soil tests with the Parcel. The results
of these tests are included in Appendix D and indicate high levels of zinc and copper.
2020 Maintenance Summary;
Despite the remedial actions taken in the winter of 2019/2020, the 2020 monitoring effort revealed
declining tree numbers across the Parcel. Those actions included Parcel -wide disking, liming, seeding,
and the replanting of approximately five acres within the former footprint of the poultry houses, as
well as selective herbicide treatments across most of the Parcel. The widespread tree mortality
affected seedlings in most monitoring plots and in all planted species.
In summary, the annual seed broadcast over the old poultry houses' footprint established soon after
planting and grew to maturity as expected. This provided more organic where bare mineral soil had
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Page 3
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

been before. The perennial seeding proved less impactful. This permanent seed mix (which has been
highly effective on nearby sites) failed to establish in most areas and sprouted marginally in others.
This was likely due to competition from established weedy species (prickly sida, dog fennel) and poor
soil conditions.
The current herbaceous vegetation condition is trending positively as more native, but weedy
perennial species such as dogfennel, broom -sedge, goldenrod, and ironweed become established.
Many areas are infested with common annual pasture weeds, and remnant pasture grasses are
hanging on in a few places. The higher end of the Parcel (closer to the driveway) has more lush
herbaceous vegetation, more surviving tree stems, and generally seems to have better soil conditions.
The Parcel's lower section still demonstrates lower herbaceous plant diversity and generally low
productivity, indicating poor soil conditions.
There was no apparent cause for the decline in tree survival (in contrast to the flooding related to
Hurricane Florence in 2018) and no observable sign of physical damage to the dead stems that were
inspected. Based on field observations throughout the 2019 growing season and into early 2020, it
does not appear that the mortality is related to damage by animals or above -ground insects, or poor
weather. The most likely issue is the existing soil condition of the Parcel. IRS submitted multiple soil
samples for analysis and followed up with state extension agents, county staff, private soil experts, and
the previous landowner regarding the historic herbicide use and turkey litter application.
These tests and conversations indicated that Parcel has elevated copper and zinc levels and a strongly
acidic character. According to the literature reviewed, this can be common in areas where high
amounts of poultry litter have been applied. While the copper and zinc levels are not acutely toxic for
the planted trees, they may have been a stressor. The low pH would tend to cause more stress. Prior
use of the Parcel as a cow pasture also degraded the soils through compaction.
With poor soil health as a primary driver behind the tree survival, the Parcel's remedial options are
somewhat limited. In early 2020, IRS completed Parcel -wide replanting with bare -root species at a rate
of 680 trees/acre. Before planting, a narrow ripping/bedding plow was established to prepare planting
rows sitewide. This plow disturbed about 24" every 8' across the Parcel. It was thought that the bedding
action would release surface compaction and incorporate organic material into the soil. It was
anticipated the ripping portion of the plow would promote deeper root growth and release soil
compaction. A narrow plow was used to minimize the disturbance. IRS documented the remedial
planting and coordinated with DWR staff —Appendix D.
IRS collected baseline data from the replanting effort, which is detailed in the Yr. 3 monitoring summary
(Appendix C). Photos of the 2020 remedial work are included in Appendix D.
2021 Maintenance Summary;
No maintenance or remedial action activities are being proposed for 2021.
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Page 4
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

5.0 REFERENCES
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule - 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (Published November 17th, 2014)
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation.
Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy 15A NCAC 2B .0233,
15A NCAC 02B .0240, and 15A NCAC 02B .0295
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, N.C.
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Page 5
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Appendix A.
Site Location Map and Background Tables
Figure 1. Site Location and Service Area
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information & Attributes
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

bg
Directions to Parcel;
•[]Take 1-40 East out of Raleigh,
-[]Take Exit 341 for NC-50/NC-55 toward
,C LIS-13/Newton Grove,
C7' .566ft -[]At the traffic circle (1.3 miles), take the
Henderson 4th exit onto LIS-13 N,
•119.4 Miles Turn Left onto Weaver Rd.,
•110.7 Miles Turn Right at Angie Drive,
r
-[]Site is located on the left.
0y ,
I'
ra�tP:t: Ac S'.irA� r: rn�
Butner
Louisburg
IIIIIrobs, 11,
95
E
Durham ti
� n�o ,;r,ff !L-elr;dl�
Falls
Reservoi
543 ft
II I I lill
f
Knightdale ,,yendell
q.
,prings •;layten
Fugu - a
Jagnc
Angier �l Smithfield
Rage n
S anf ord Roc k
Qate Park
Buies
Creek
Lillington
Legend Ervin con:
r'�Il ili
O Project Pin Point
O USGS Neuse 03020201 River Basin Bdry ! �s,
Lump 'y
OService Area - Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset sdt
(Neuse 01 Minus Falls Lake Watershed)
Weaver Farm Bank Parcel
35018'16.01 "N
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment 780 7'44 27"W
P (PpFpg,C&PCO, USGS, FAO, NIPS, NRCAp,-,5ggQ , IGN, Kadaster NIL,
OrdrtAtmaa Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo,
Mb'pWIndiap© OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community m
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC SCALE: 1 in = 54,167 ft
N
Weaver Farm
1101 HAYNES ST, SUITE 211 DATE:3-2018
RALEIGH, NC 27604
Figure 1 - Parcel Location / Service Area
PHONE: [phone] SITE: WF01-000
FAX : [phone]
This map aid au data a,ntamed within are s,ppried bs is wpm n, warranty. P,st,rzaon Systems TLC e.pr,ssiv
disdbims rasp,nslbmtYPome9as rdaoruability fr,msnvdbimsmatmavads.,,t,ft h. vss ormis,ssotmis map. iris
• • ms sots rsspvnsmioty vt ms s,r t, dstsrmms it ms dbta ov this map is o pb ie rim ms vs,rs vssds. Tres map
wt'r,,tsd bs s rv,y data, wr snvwd it bs used bs s,d,. t is ms �s,rs r,spvvsmioH t, obt am prvpsr survey
°a<a'preparedbya°Ceo5ed50Neyer'rnererep°iredby1—
c
Aerial Imagery: ( ) ESRI
Miles
Coordinate System:
0 2.25 4.5 9 13.5 18 NAD_1983_SP_INC _RIPS _3200_Ft.

Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Buffer Zone
Credit Type
Mitigation
Total
Credit
Credit per
Total Credits
Type
Acreage
Ratio
Acre
UT2 Zone A (TOB to 50')
Riparian
Restoration
3.16
1:1
43,560 sq.
137,649.6 sq. ft.
Buffer
ft./acre
UT2 Zone B (51' - 100')
Riparian
Restoration
2.99
1:1
43,560 sq.
130,244.4 sq. ft.
Buffer
ft./acre
Total
Riparian
6.15
267,894.0 sq. ft.
Buffer
UT2 Zone C (101' - 200)
Nitrogen
Restoration
5.26
n/a
2,273.02
11,956.08 lbs.
lbs./acre
Ditches (TOB - 200')
Nitrogen
Restoration
10.10
n/a
2,273.02
lbs./acre
22,957.50 lbs.
Total
Nitrogen
14.64
34,913.58 lbs.
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity / Milestone
BPDP Proposed Date
Actual Date
BPDP Approved
NA
July 7t", 2017
Parcel purchased in Fee -Simple
June 2017
June 22"d, 2017
Parcel Protection via conservation easement
June 2017
June 27t", 2017
Cattle exclusion /fence construction
June 2017
July —August 2017
Removal of poultry houses / impervious
surfaces
June/July 2017
August —October 2017
Soil preparation
July through November 2017
October— December 2017
Removal of Powerline/Pole
NA
December 2017
Planting
December 2017
December 12t", 2017
As -Built Data Collection
January 2018
December 14t" —16t", 2017
Construction Completion Walkthrough
NA
February 1", 2018
As -Built Report Submittal
January 2018
March 2018
Year 1(2018) Monitoring
October 2018
October 2018
Year 2 (2019) Monitoring
October 2019
November 2019
Year 3 (2020) Monitoring
October 2020
October 2020
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS
Appendices
Restoration Systems, LLC

Table 3: Project Contact Table
Firm
POC & Address
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Bank Sponsor
Restoration Systems, LLC
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer
919.755.9490
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Designer:
Restoration Systems, LLC
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Raymond Holz
919.604.9314
Kenneth Strader; 336.314.2935 780
Construction Contractor:
Strader Fencing Inc
Landmark Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592-7756
Mary -Margaret McKinney 252.482.8491
Planting Contractor:
Carolina Silvics
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, NC 27932
Lloyd Glover; 919.422.3392 780 Landmark
Seeding Contractor:
Land Mechanics, Inc.
Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592-7756
Nursery Stock Suppliers:
ArborGen
1.888.888.7158
Baseline Data Collection &
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693 218 Snow Ave.
Annual Monitoring
Raleigh, NC 27603
Table 4: Project Baseline Information & Attributes Table
Project Information
Project Name
Weaver Farm
County
Wayne
Project Area (acres)
21.81
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
Latitude: 35°18'16.01" N , Longitude: 78744.27" W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
03020201170010
DWQ Sub -basin
03-04-12
Project Drainage Area, Total Outfall (miles)
0.07 miz
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
< 1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Cropland and Pasture
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Table 5. Planting List
Vegetation Association:
Basic Oak -Hickory Forest
Coastal Plain Bottomland
Hardwoods
Acreage: 22.10 Acres
15.02 acres
7.08 acres
Species (bare root = BR)
Spec-ed
Planted
Spec-ed
Planted
White oak (Quercus alba) - BR
2,750
2,750
*Northern red oak (Quercus rubra) - BR
2,750
0
Shumard oak (Quercus shumardii)
0
1,375
Cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda)
0
1,375
Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) - BR
2,750
2,750
Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) - BR
2,750
2,750
Water oak (Quercus nigra) - BR
1,900
1,900
Willow oak (Quercus phellos) - BR
22
1,900
1,900
River birch (Betula nigra) - BR
1,900
1,900
Total (18,600)
11,000
11,000
5,700
5,700
* Due to availability issues, Northern red oak was removed from the proposed planting list. Shumard and cherrybark
oak were used as substitute species.
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Component and Asset
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Legend r
Easement t
_ Ditches and Streams` -
0 CVS Plots meeting success criteria during MY3 (2020) J
0 CVS Plots not meeting success criteria during MY3 (2020)� • ,
,b�
50m x 2m Vegetation Transects neeting success criteria during MY3 (2020)
c ,
8
16
15
14
17
0 125 250 500
Feet
1
12
11
3
N
N Axiom Environimnial, Inc.
:sue; G — Prepared for:
•:F
RESTORATION
6
7
Project:
WEAVER FARM
RIPARIAN BUFFER &
- NUTRIENT OFFSET
BANK PARCEL
5
Wayne County, NC
fi
^ CURRENT
4 - CONDITIONS
PLAN VIEW
Notes:
Background Imagery Source:
Google Earth 03-2019
�. Drawn by: KRJ
Date: NOV 2020
Scale: 1:1750
Project No.: 17-021
FIGURE
2

Feature 3
- -x+
• '� � Origin Point for UT-2
j
Feature 1 ; —,—,— •—•—•—•—•—•—
UT 2
/ I -•-.-.-.
I
• , �� , , ,�, sus „>.�, . � �.z. _
m
Feature 2
Mitigation Total Credit Credit per
Buffer Zone Credit Type Total Credits
Type Acreage Ratio Acre
Riparian 43,560 sq.
UTZ Zone A (TOB to 50') Buffer Restoration 3.16 1:1 ft./acre 137,649.6 sq. ft.
UTZ Zone B (51'-100') Buffer Riparian Restoration 2.99 1:1 ft./acre 43,560 sq. 130,244.4 sq. ft.
`4 Riparian
Total Buffer 6.15 267,894.0 sq. ft.
UTZ Zone C (101' - 200) Nitrogen Restoration 5.26 n/a 2,273.02 Ibs./acre 11,956.081bs.
—_-
2,273.02
Ditches (TOB- 200') Nitrogen Restoration 10.10 n/a Ibs./acre 22,957.501bs.
Total Nitrogen 14.64 34,913.581bs.
Legend
OFinal Conservation Easement: 22.81 Acres
Top of Bank (Features + UT-2): 0.65 Acres
TOB - 50ft
TOB - 100ft
r r TOB - 200ft
AsBuilt Credit Determination
Stream (UT-2), Zone A JOB to 50'), Riparian Buffer: 3.16 Acres
Stream (UT-2), Zone B (51' - 100'), Riparian Buffer: 2.99 Acres
Stream (UT-2), Zone C (101' - 200'), Nutrient Offset: 5.26 Acres
Surface Water Conveyance, JOB to 200'): 10.10 Acres
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC SCALE: 1 in = 250 ft
ti
Figure
1101 HAYNES ST, SUITE 211 DATE:3-2018
RALEIGH, NC 27604
Component and Asset
PHONE: [phone] SITE: WF01-000
FAX : [phone]
This map and au data a,ntamed within are s,ppried as is wpm ne warranty. Rest,-b— systems TLC e.pressiv
dissiaimsr.sp,nsidmty rot damag�or liability fr,msnydaimsmatmay ans., t of t h.—or mis—of this map. It is
• ' • me sots respensmioty of the user to determine if me data en this map is eempaedie with the users needs. This map aa
ot:
ncreated as s,rvey data not =Fond t de ed as sed,. t is e es,rons s—pmmH am to obt proper s,rvey <a, prepared by a oeensed s,,.y,r, M.re rege�sered ev iaw. m
Service Layer Credits: Aerial Ima er : c ESRI
9 Y I )
Feet Coordinate Sy stem
NAD 1983 SP_NC RIPS 3200 Ft.
0 60 120 240 360 480 — — — — —

Weaver Farm
MY3 (2020) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (taken October 2020)
Weaver Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Year 3 (2020) Monitoring
Appendices

Weaver Farm
MY3 (2020) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (taken October 2020)
Weaver Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Year 3 (2020) Monitoring
Appendices

Weaver Farm
MY3 (2020) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (taken October 2020)
Weaver Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Year 3 (2020) Monitoring
Appendices

Weaver Farm
MY3 (2020) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (taken October 2020)
Weaver Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendices
Year 3 (2020) Monitoring

Appendix C.
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6. Planted and Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8. Planted Vegetation Totals
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Table 6. Planted and Total Stems by Plot and Species
Project Code 17021. Project Name: Weaver Nutrient
Current Plot Data (MY3 2020)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
17021-AXE-0001
17021-AXE-0002
17021-AXE-0003
17021-AXE-0004
17021-AXE-0005
17021-AXE-0006
17021-AXE-0007
17021-AXE-0008
17021-AXE-0009
17021-AXE-0010
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
Carya
hickory
Tree
Catalpa
catalpa
Tree
Celtis
hackberry
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
5
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
9
9
9
5
5
5
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
1
1
1
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
6
6
6
Prunus
plum
Shrub or Tree
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
1
1
Ptelea trifoliata
common hoptree
Shrub Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus shumardii
Shumard's oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus shumardii var. shur
Shumard oak
Tree
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac
shrub
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
Ulmus americans
IAmerican elm
Tree
Unknown
I
Shrub or Tree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
13
13
13
15
15
15
211
211
21
141
141
14
19
19
19
17
171
17
8
8
8
111
11
11
16
161
16
18
181
18
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
5
5
5
8
8
8
11
11
11
7
7
7
10
10
10
8
8
8
3
3
3
6
6
6
5
5
5
6
6
6
526.1
526.1
526.1
607
607
607
849.8
849.8
849.8
566.6
566.6
566.6
768.9
768.9
768.9
688
688
688
323.7
323.7
323.7
445.2
445.2
445.2
647.5
647.5
647.5
728.4
728.4
728.4
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P-all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Table 6. Planted and Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
Project Code 17021. Project Name: Weaver Nutrient
Current Plot Data (MY3 2020)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
17021-AXE-0011
17021-AXE-0012
17021-AXE-0013
17021-AXE-0014
17021-AXE-0015
17021-AXE-0016
17021-AXE-0017
17021-AXE-0018
17021-AXE-0019
17021-AXE-0020
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
5
5
5
1
2
2
6
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
1
Catalpa
catalpa
Tree
1
Celtis
hackberry
Tree
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
3
3
3
6
6
6
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
Prunus
plum
Shrub or Tree
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Ptelea trifoliata
common hoptree
Shrub Tree
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
9
9
9
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
8
8
8
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus shumardii
Shumard's oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus shumardii var. shur
Shumard oak
Tree
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac
shrub
1
1
1
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
2
2
2
Ulmus americans
JAmerican elm
Tree
1
1
1
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
1
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
121
12
12
12
12
12
14
14
14
13
13
15
20
201
25
151
151
15
15
151
15
9
9
9
11
11
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
6
6
6
7
7
7
5
5
5
8
8
10
6
6
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
1
1
1
6
6
6
5
5
5
485.6
485.6
485.6
485.6
485.6
485.6
566.6
566.6
566.6
526.1
526.1
607
809.4
809.4
1012
607
607
607
607
607
6071
364.2
364.2
364.2
445.2
445.2
445.2
445.21
445.2
445.2
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P-all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Table 6. Planted and Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
Project Code 17021. Project Name: Weaver Nutrient
Current Plot Data (MY3 2020)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
17021-AXE-0021
17021-AXE-0022
MY3 (Fall 2020)
MY3 (Spring 2020)
MY2 (20 9)
MY1 (2018)
MYO (2017)
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
1
1
13
13
18
16
16
32
1
1
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
32
32
32
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Catalpa
catalpa
Tree
1
Celtis
hackberry
Tree
4
4
4
6
6
6
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
1
1
1
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
8
8
8
58
58
58
63
63
63
29
29
29
39
39
39
59
59
59
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
23
23
23
37
37
37
4
4
4
4
4
4
37
37
37
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
11
11
47
47
47
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
22
22
22
27
27
27
1
1
1
2
2
2
Prunus
plum
Shrub or Tree
4
4
4
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
1
1
7
7
7
9
9
9
Ptelea trifoliata
common hoptree
Shrub Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
Quercus
oak
Tree
4
4
4
35
35
35
52
52
52
5
5
5
6
6
6
20
20
20
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
1
1
10
10
10
7
7
7
14
14
14
24
24
24
48
48
48
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
20
20
20
24
24
24
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
9
9
9
8
8
8
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
14
14
14
16
16
16
24
24
24
40
40
40
84
84
84
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
45
45
45
45
45
45
18
18
18
19
19
19
44
44
44
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
8
8
8
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
10
10
10
Quercus shumardii
Shumard's oak
Tree
3
3
3
5
5
5
3
3
3
7
7
7
10
10
10
Quercus shumardii var. shur
Shumard oak
Tree
11
1
1
1
1
1
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac
shrub
1
1
1
11
11
11
12
12
12
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
1
11
1
2
2
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
181
181
18
5
51
5
3071
3071
314
4001
400
416
7091
1091
112
151
1511
151
3491
3491
349
1
1
22
22
22
22
22
0.02
0.02
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.54
71
71
7
4
41
4
251
251
27
261
261
261
121
121
13
121
121
12
12
121
12
728.41
728.4
728.4
202.31
202.31
202.3
564.71
564.71
577.61
735.81
735.81
765.21200.51
200.51
206
277.81
277.81
277.8
6421
6421
642
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P-all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Table 7. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data 2020 MY3
Species
50m x 2m Temporary Plot
T-1
Bearing — 451
Start coordinates:
35.305483,-78.125822
End coordinates:
35.305107,-78.126125
T-2
Bearing — 2801
Start coordinates:
35.304545,-78.126643
End coordinates:
35.304579,-78.127191
T-3
Bearing — 3411
Start coordinates:
35.304914,-78.128578
End coordinates:
35.305251,-78.128942
Acer rubrum
5
Betula nigra
1
1
Celtis occidentalis
2
Cornus ammomum
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
6
9
Liriodendron tulipifera
2
Platanus occidentalis
3
Quercus lyrata
1
2
Quercus nigra
1
1
Quercus phellos
1
Quercus spp.
1
Total Stems
14
13
12
Total Stems/Acre
567
526
486
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Table 8. Planted Vegetation Totals 2020 MY3
Plot #
Planted Stems/Acre*
Success Criteria Met?
1
445
Yes
2
486
Yes
3
607
Yes
4
486
Yes
5
728
Yes
6
567
Yes
7
283
No
8
445
Yes
9
647
Yes
10
728
Yes
11
486
Yes
12
445
Yes
13
567
Yes
14
445
Yes
15
809
Yes
16
607
Yes
17
567
Yes
18
364
Yes
19
445
Yes
20
405
Yes
21
607
Yes
22
121
No
T-1
567
Yes
T-2
526
Yes
T-3
486
Yes
Average Planted Stems/Acre
515
Yes
* Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) was planted and was counted as such during year 3 (2020) vegetation
monitoring. However, this species does not count toward riparian buffer success. Loblolly pine was not
included in this table's stem density calculations.
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0001
VMD Year (1-5): F-i-I Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304262 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) ' ",,
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.127533 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (in): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 8
Date last planted:
New I rating date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re -
ID Species Name * Vigor Damage Notes
P char O.lm O.lm lcm 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
679
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
1.2
0.4
31.0
680
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
1.3
2.0
25.0
683
Ptelea trifoliata
Q
R
3.9
3.4
50.0
1854
Quercus phellos
Q
R
3.6
0.5
41.0
❑
1855
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
6.8
3.1
35.0
1856
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.1
1.8
82.0
1857
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
9.3
3.8
65.0
1858
Pinus taeda
©
R
8.0
1.6
28.0
El
1859
Pious taeda
©
R
8.1
4.5
30.0
1860
Quercus phellos
®
R
5.9
1.9
31.0
1861
Quercus phellos
®
R
6.0
4.7
51.0
1862
Quercus phellos
i
O
R
6.2
7.0
31.0
El
1863
Pious taeda
O
R
8.3
7.1
22.0
El
1864
Quercus alba
R
9.5
8.4
50.0
1865
Quercus phellos
®
R L41
-"
9.5
42.0
1866
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
1.4
5.7
30.0
1867
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
1.3
8.1
22.0
MMUMMMIMI
EMMIMMMIMMI
MMISIM_-
®Mu©MMIMI
M®1■I0MIMMI
®®[U®_MIMI
=-1X,®_-
__"M_MMI
# stems: 17 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
P (m) (in) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor Damage Notes
*SOURCE: Tr Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanical U=Unknown p, I
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, -DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CYS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

■'•—VVVl Apr 2020 Data Z
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species map
source X Y) (mm Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- ,
(m) (m ) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) snm„t Vigor* Damage* Notes
Natural Woody Stems - tallied b Species Exulanation of cutoff
ei ht Cpt-Off(All stems shoiterthan this are ignored. If>10cm, explain to the right.): ❑&Ocm❑ SOcm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS — �y
HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH
Species Name 0Suh- 10 cm- 50 cm 100 cm- TREES —DBH
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2,5_ 5_ =10
(write DBH)
* *Required if cit-off >l Ocm or subsample ? 100%.
�1 •Z r ? ! •4 "S �6 � r'S
0 w■ •• •o rT'�j 10 Form W S2, ver 9.1
*VIG R : 4 Tr=era_ nSAlant. L_=Live stake, B=Ball d burlap, p=potted, Tu=Tublin,. R=_bare Root M=Mechan_ically�L1=Un_known_
*VIGOR: 4=excell'ee year,
good, adfair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock Oth
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMaI, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURR' (ath DISeased VINE 2
M=missing. er/Unknown
ne,
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. KNown, specify other.
Printed in the CYS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0001
X-axis: 8. # stems: 17
Y
X:5m
0-map size.'
N LARGE
*SOURCE: Ti=Transplant. L=Live stake. B=Ball and burMI y, P=PottTu=Tubling_ R=bare Root M—Mechanicall U=U_nknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=9ood, 2--fair, * , _ = _ — --
DAMAGE: REMova1, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, ROD t , INSects, GAME, LNESTock, Other/Unknownp. 1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, D Sects, G ,STORM, —Took, thne, DISeased, VINE 3
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to I0cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Too! ver. 2.3.

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0002 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): Fi-] Date: / / / /
Taxonomic Standard: c/
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.303918 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) -' C
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.126882 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 31
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * 1cm* 1 cm sprout g g
700
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
1.1
0.4
80.0
❑
702
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
0.1
1.9
42.0
El
703
R
i
0.0
2.4
68.0
El
705
Quercus phellos
®
R
2.7
0.8
30.0
❑
708
Quercus phellos
Q
1
1.7
3.8
21.0
1869
Quercus lyrata
Q
R
5.1
2.2
30.0
1870
Rhus glabra
Q
R
7.9
1.2
52.0
❑
1871
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.9
3.5
42.0
❑
1872
Rhus glabra
R
7.3
3.2
48.0
1873 •
Quercus alba
0
R
3.1
4.5
30.0
El
1874
Rhus glabra
Q
R
6.7
5.0
55.0
EJ
1875
Pinus taeda
O
R
8.5
5.9
32.0
❑
1876
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.4
8.1
42.0
1877
Pious taeda
R
7.7
8.0
20.0
1878
Prunus sp.
O i
R
5.9
6.9
11.0
1879
Rhus glabra
®
R
5.0
9.0
52.0
1880
Quercus sp.
O
2.1
10.0
32.0
El
1881
Quercus lyrata
®
R
2.7
8.9
18.0
❑
1882
Quercus sp. /
Q
R
3.0
7.3
48.0
❑
1883
Quercus shumardii
O
R
4.0
5.0
38.0
❑
1884
Quercus phellos
Q
R
0.4
6.9
50.0
El
®-0-_-.
®-m-_
s
-"©_-
®-m®_-
m-m©_-
# stems: 21 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species NameX Y Height DBH Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage*Notes
d rl. -,.'. 'f 0
*SOURCE: Tr--Transplant� L=Live stake, B=B_a_Il and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, UUnknown p. 4
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEnoy Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
ID Species
h
17021-AXE-0002
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
Apr 2020 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
c
* ddh
(mm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor * Damaga Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of ad-0ff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsarnolins*•:
ei htCat-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>l0cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 13 7cm
Species Name 0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required if cutoff>1Ocm or subsample?100%. •l
:2
* 3
•■
f4
►
1 !-05
*0
N
10 FonnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically U=Unknown _
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0002 x-axis: 31 ° # stems: 21
0 N map size:
LARGE
Y:'
*SOURCE: Tr—TranTllant, I=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap; P=Potted Tu=TublingzR=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4 excellent, 3=good 2--fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, Mects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown 6
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m.
Printed in the CYS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0003
VMD Year (1-5): FTI Date:
Taxonomic Standard: I v
Taxonomic Standard DATE: I ct -,1 U
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304174 Datum: 'NAD83/W '
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.126072 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): I -Axis bearing (deg): 29
Yarty: Kole:
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Votes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Naive char 0.1m O.lm 1cm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
715
Quercus lyrata
Q
R
1.6
2.2
41.0
❑
718
Pinus taeda
©
R
0.5
1.3
20.0
El
719
Quercus lyrata
®
R
4.2
1.2
21.0
720
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
7.4
1.0
5.0
722
Quercus sp.
@
R
6.5
0.1
25.0
723
Pinus taeda
®
R
5.9
3.4
30.0
❑
724
Pinus taeda
O
R
7.7
1.8
21.0
725
Quercus alba
0
R
8.7
4.4
40.0
❑
729
C,ek4sp, I �
0
R
9.7
3.6
22.0
❑
1886
Quercus lyrata
(j)
R
6.7
4.6
10.0
❑
L
1887
Rhus glabra
R
7.7
4.7
29.0
1888
Quercus nigra
R
6.3
4.6
20.0
❑
1889
Quercus alba
Q
R
4.9
4.9
28.0
❑
1890
Quercus alba
0
R
6.1
68 _(
28.0
1891
Quercus sp.
Q
R
5.8
6.7
72.0
❑
1892
Quercus phellos
®
R
5.4
6.3
32.0
El
1893
Ptelea trifoliata
Q
R
5.5
9.3
58.0
El
1894
Quercus lyrata
0
R
5.1
9.5
70.0
1895
Pinus taeda
©
R
9.9
6.3
28.0
1896
Pinus taeda
Q
R
7.7
7.5
28.0
1897
Quercus phellos
®
R
3.8
8.0
40.0
1898
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
2.9
5.2
48.0
1899
Morus rubra
®
R
0.2
7.3
80.0
1900
Quercus lyrata
Q
R
0.0
5.4
72.0
❑
1901
]T..�: ^ ^r �� u, a
0
R
1.9
10.0
21.0
❑
# stems:
25 New Stems, not included last
year, but are obviously planted.
If more space
X
Y
Height
DBH
Species Name
Source*
(m)
(m)
1 cm*
1 cm
Vigor*
®
MMMMM
_-mw_-
mm"E
"M
m-m®_-
MMIUMM
M-1NAM_�
needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake: B=Ball and burlap, P=Pottedju=Tubling. R=Root _bare RoM=Mechanically,.U=Unknown _ _ p..•
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to IOcm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEnhy Tool ver. 2.3.1

1 / V.&X-'AAJV,-0003
Apr ZUZU Data
z
THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y
ID Species
ddh Height DBH
0
ddh
Height DBH Re -
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
* (mm)
(cm) (cm) sprout Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & snhsampLinQ**:
Cut-Ofi'(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ SOcm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137Cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES I SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name L( Sub- 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm =10
Seed 50 em 100 cm 137 cm 3ap1 0-1 em 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (writeDBI)
**Required ifcttoff>I0cm or subsample? 100%. w• i !4 6 A
00+000 g :: ::l0 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake_, B=Ball and burlap, P=PottediTu=Tubling, R=bare Rooms M=Mechanically, U Unknown _ *VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2 fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, OthedUnknown P 8
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m.
Printed in the CYS-EEPEntry Too! ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0003
51
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 29 ° # stems: 25
N map size:
� LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr —Trap lant, L=Live stake, B=Ba_ll and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Roott M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 9
*'VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
•HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please till in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0004 P1+1\: Role: Date last planted: 04/2020
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304457 Datum: NAD831W
(dec.deg. or m) -
Longitude or UTM-E: 1-78.126072 UTM Zone: P63
Coordinate Accuracy (in):1 X-Axis bearing (deg):
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions_ X: 10 y; 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data z
0
ID
Species Name
Map
Source*
X Y
Height
D B H
char
0.1m
0.1m
lcm*
1 cm
733
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
k
1.5
2.0
50.0
El
736
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
3.5
2.2
40.0
❑
739
Quercus pagoda
O
R
1.4
3.4
50.0
El
742
Quercus sp.
O
R
0.4
4.8
42.0
❑
1673
Quercus sp.
Q
R
2.6
5.0
31.0
1903
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
5.8
2.2
51.0
❑
1904
Pinus taeda
Q
R
6.8
0.5
20.0
1905
Pinus taeda
O
R
9.5
1.0
20.0
❑
1906
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
7.4
2.4
52.0
❑
1907
Quercus pagoda
O
R
7.3
3.3
53.0
❑ .
1908
Acer rubrum
R
7.7
6.2
50.0
1909
Acer rubrum
R
8.3
3.9
52.0
❑
1910
Acer rubrum
O
R
10.0
6.0
28.0
1911
Pinus taeda
O
R
8.9
7.7
20.0
1912
Quercus lyrata
O
R
6.6
7.5
31.0
-Q
1913
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
7.1
5.5
22.0
1914
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.4
5.5
38.0
❑
1915
Pinus taeda
O
R
4.5
5.2
10.0
❑
1916
Quercus lyrata
®
R
1.5
7.1
40.0
❑
1917
Quercus lyrata
®
R
4.1
2.2
38.0
❑
# stems: 20 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height D:Vigor'Damage*
m sprout
F
�ISim
�-���_-
on
m�li■7®��
101-��_-
mom[■7���
1 41k,11A,.
Species Name Source* (in) (in) Height
DBmH Vigor* Damage* Notes
I cm*
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplants IrLive stake, B=Ball and burlap P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically_, U=Unknown �. 10
*VIGOR: 4-excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
ID Species
17021-AXE-0004
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
Apr 2020 Data
ddh Height DBH
(nun) (cm) (cm)
o
ddh Height
(mm.) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsann of cutoff
m
HeLhtCut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain whytotheright.): ❑ 10cm 1:150em ❑ 1 0cm ❑ 137em
Species Name El
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES
— DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm 1
100 cm
100 em
137 cm
Sum
Sao
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
V
(writeDBllSao
"Required ifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. rl
*2 03
i■
64
i
H::5#"i�ID
i
#/ 8 10 Form W S2, ver 9 .1
*SOURCE: Tt=TranVjan : L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted,. Tu=Tublin�, R=bare Root. M=Mechanically, U=Unknown P. 11
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10em if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0004
9)
1 :5n g
c
Y
(0,0)
X:5m
X-axis: 63 °
N # stems: 20
map size:
U LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, LTLive stake, B_=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tub_ling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically. U=Unknown P,12
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMovat, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17621-AXE-0005 P:=`i : Role: Date last planted: 04/2020
VMD Year (1-5): [ 4] Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304957 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 1-78.125511 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): I X-Axis bearing (deg): 51
New lanring date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10. Y: F 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH # Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
747
Quercus pagoda
®
k
0.4
0.4
45.0
❑
751
Quercus lyrata
@
R
0.2
1.3
40.0
❑
752
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
2.7
1.5
40.0
❑
754
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
F
R
1.4
3.5
42.0
❑
758
Quercus phellos
Q
R
4.2
3.8
42.0
❑
1919
Quercus lyrata
©
R
5.5
1.6
30.0
❑
1920
Pinus taeda
R
7.8
2.1
30.0
❑
1921
Quercus alba
Q
R
7.7
1.4
10.0
❑
1922
Ptelea trifoliata
Q
R
6.7
0.3
38.0
❑
1923
Pinus taeda
O
R
9.3
1.0
20.0
❑
1924
Quercus phellos
Q
R
6.8
4.3
28.0
❑
1925
Quercus phellos
O
R
9.6
5.2
42.0
❑
1926
Quercus rubra
Q
R
9.4
6.7
&0
❑
1927
Celtis sp.
Q
R
7.0
7.1
48.0
❑
1928
Quercus sp.
O
R
5.8
9.0
10.0
❑
1929
Quercus sp.
0
R
9.4
7.7
22.0
❑
1930
Quercus lyrata
Q
R
7.1
9.8
15.0
❑
1931
Quercus lyrata
Q
R
5.1
-4�8
V
49.0
❑
1932
Quercus lyrata
@
R
7.5
7.2
41.0
❑
1933
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
1.3
9.6
40.0
❑
4
1934
Quercus lyrata
Q
R
0.5
7.7
39.0
❑
1935
Celtis sp.
Q
R
1.5
6.1
71.0
❑
1936
Celtis sp.
Q
R
4.3
6.3
48.0
# stems: 23 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* (m) (m) High DBH Vigor* Damage* Notes
I cm*
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanicall y, U=Unknown p. 13
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects; GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
17021-AXE-0005
Apr 2020 Data
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
o
a ddh Height
DBH Be-
char (in) (in)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
* (mm) (cm)
(cm) sprout Vigor* Damage* Notes
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Cut-O ff (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right,
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
Species Name p snb 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm
-
Seed seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm
Ex lanation of cutoff
& suNam ds¢**
❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 1 Ocm ❑
SAPLINGS — DBH
Sap l 0-1 cm + 1-2.5 2.5-
i
**Required if cutoff>10cmor subsample ? 100%. 01 02 3 • �d H� b
• +• /• •■
Slcm
TREES — DBH
=10
5- (write DBH)
::8 J:r 1::10 Form WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant. L=Live stake, B_=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tubline. R=bare Root. M=Mechanical U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4ellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, Mects, GAME, LIVESTock, Othea/ nknown P=14
=exc
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to IOcm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m.
Printed in the CYS-EEPEntry Too! ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0005
Y: f
{0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 51 *
# stems: 23
N
0/ map size:
LARGE
*SOURCE: Ti—Transplant.. L=Live stake, B=Ball and burp P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root_ M=Mechanically U=Unknown _ p. 15
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMaI, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 11021-AXE-0006
VMD Year (1-5): 4❑ Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
C140
Latitude or UTM-N:
35.305349 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
r r-
-78.125201 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
I X-Axis bearing (deg): 52
Date last planted: 04/2020
New lanting date tn/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 y; 10 plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH N Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m Icm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
764
Pinus taeda
®
R
0.2
1.0
30.0
El
766
Quercus alba
®
R
1.8
2.1
50.0
❑
768
Quercus phellos
R
2.0
2.9
42.0
❑
769
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
2.2
1.2
41.0
❑
773
Pinus taeda
O
R
5.2
1.1
20.0
❑
774
Quercus phellos
®
R
5.2
3.3
57.0
❑
1676
Quercus rubra
O
R
6.2
2.2
21.0
El
1677
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
@
R
8.0
1.2
39.0
El
1937
Acer rubrum
Q
R
8.2
8.4
45.0
❑
1938
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
9.3
5.9
20.0
❑
1939
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
6.6
6.0
10.0
1940
Celtis sp.
R
7.5
8.6
42.0
1941
Celtis sp.
O
R
9.8
8.7
30.0
1942
Pinus taeda
®
R
5.0
8.4
15.0
❑
1943
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
1.8
7.7
63.0
❑
1944
Rhus glabra
R
2.9
9.8
39.0
El
1945
Rhus glabra
O
R
0.0
9.1
20.0
❑
1946
Quercus sp.
©
R
1.7
5.5
58.0
❑
1947
Quercus sp.
R
3.9
6.5
34.0
1948
Quercus sp.
Q
R
4.2
5.8
32.0
❑
_-"©_-
®mr■_»��
mmu"Mm
# stems: 20 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (PL4 ited Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* " X Y Height DBH
cm* 1 cm Vigor* * Damage* Notes
(m) (❑❑m) 1
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant. L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tublin , R=bare Root. M=Mechanically U=Unknown I. 16
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANINU, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in tke CVS-EEPEntry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
ID Species
17021-AXE-0006
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
Apr 2020 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
c
y ddh
* (mm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
'iei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If >10cm, explain why totheright): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
Sap,
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifci#off>lOcm or subsample?100%. 01
S2
*3 11604
1 *45
6
4
+
::10 Form WS2,va9.1
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tublin.R=bare Root, M_=Mechanically, U=Unknown _ _ p. 17
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0006
51
(0,0) a:5m
X-axis: 521
I
# stems: 20
0//
Nmap size:
LARGE
101
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=TubliM R=bare Root; M=Mechanically,.U=Unknown _ P.. 18
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0007
VMD Year (1-5): �4 Date: / Cy
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ZD�
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.305286 'Datum: jNAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) r
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.124794 UTM Zone
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 24
Plot Dim- ' • X 10 Yin
me v- MeDc
:
Date last planted: 04/2020
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
stons. ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vi orDama ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g ge Notes
1950
Pinus taeda
®
R
0.9
1.5
21.0
❑
1951
Pinus taeda
0
R
3.1
0.9
30.0
❑
1952
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
3.0
3.8
41.0
❑
1953
Pinus taeda
O
R
5.4
3.3
20.0
❑
1954
Pinus taeda
©
R
5.8
0.9
20.0
❑
1955
Pinus taeda
®
R
7.9
0.8
20.0
❑
1956
Quercus lyrata
Q
R
5.5
6.1
60.0
❑
1957
Quercus lyrata
0
R
7.8
5.5
50.0
❑
1958
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
7.2
8.0
40.0
❑
1959
Pinus taeda
®
R
5.3
9.2
18.0
❑
1960
Quercus lyrata
®
R
2.3
6.7
40.0
❑
1961
Quercus lyrata
O
R
0.2
7.8
49.0
❑
1962
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
2.9
10.0
53.0
❑
1963
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
0.8
4.7
20.0
❑
1964
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
8.1
2.9
20.0
❑
# stems: IS New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tublin,, R=bare Roo M=Mechanically, U=Unknown P 19
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Panted in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
ID S eC1eS
P
17021-AXE-0007
map source X Y I
char (m) (m)
Apr 2020 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
c
ddh
(mm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplinQ**:
ei h CUt- Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ Dim ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
sab
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Rcquiredifettoff>]Ocmorsubsample?100%. 01
102 3
R4
to
!! II 1,
1
H^
R >
10 Form WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: TfTransplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlapP=Potted. Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root. M=Mechanically_ U=Unknown P. 20
VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, AN1Mal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0007
C
) :51
(0.0)
X:5m
X-axis: 24 *
# stems: 15
N map size:
� LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant. L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, T_u=Tubling. R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Pl 17021 AXE OOOg Part.: Role: Date last planted:
Ot - -
VMD Year (1-5): � Date: / /
Taxonomic Standard: Vx 4$1
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ( .
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.305633 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) 78.125794 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accurac (m)• 11 X-Axis bearing (deg): 97
�m
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Y _
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 101 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 0 Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
789
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
0.8
1.6
55.0
❑
792
Quercus phellos
Q
R
0.2
0.5
28.0
❑
793
Acer rubrum
®
R
3.3
1.6
30.0
❑
796
Quercus phellos
O
R
1.0
7.
22.0
❑
1966
Quercus sp.
®
R
1.0
4.6
20.0
❑
1967
Quercus phellos
O
R
3.2
4.5
20.0
❑
1968
Quercus sp.
O
R
5.6
4.5
18.0
❑
1969
Quercus phellos
®
R
7.3
4.6
22.0
❑
1970
Quercus phellos
R
9.7
4.4
40.0
❑
1971
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
6.5
1.7
73.0
❑
1972
Platanus occidentalis
Q
R
9.3
1.7
52.0
❑
1973
Quercus sp.
Q
R
5.4
7.6
28.0
❑
1974
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
7.9
7.8
32.0
❑
1975
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
10.0
7.7
32.0
❑
1976
Platanus occidentalis
Q
R
1.1
9.3
71.0
❑
1977
Prunus serotina
®
R
2.9--,7,.5
33.0
❑
==nom�
# stems: 16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant- L=Live stakesB=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tubling,_ R=bare Root, M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 22
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, 1 ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
# stems: 16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant- L=Live stakesB=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tubling,_ R=bare Root, M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 22
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, 1 ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0008 Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
P char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
IStxplanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & suhsarndiag *:
[lei YhtCut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10om ❑50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES I SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
10 cm 50 cm 100 cm -
Species Name c Se d 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- ite
(write DBH)
**Required ifcitoff>10cm or subsample? 100%.
*I :2 i 3 • •4 N5 6
i• ■• •• •■
n; III,, Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root. M=Mechanical] U=Unknown p. 23
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1
1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0008
l :5
(0.0) X:5m
X-axis: 971 N # stems: 16
U map size:
LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant L=Live stake, B=Ball and burp, P=Potted, T_u=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 24
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, OtherAJnknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. i Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CYS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0009 Role: Date last planted•
VMD Year (1-5): �4 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:��
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.305245 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) s
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.125704 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 I X-Axis bearing (deg): 47
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vi orDama e* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm # lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
803
Quercus pagoda
O
R
0.2
0.5
70.0
❑
812
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
2.0
1.1
28.0
❑
815
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
4.7
1.3
30.0
❑
816
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
2.3
4.2
50.0
1978
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
0.6
4.4
32.0
El
1979
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R 5--Vr
4-r3 , C�
l
30.0
1980
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
7.1
1.1
23.0
El
1981
Liriodendron tulipifera
@
It
9.5
1.3
22.0
El
1982
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
6.7
4.0
38.0
❑
1983
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
9.0
4.0
34.0
❑
1984
Platanus occidentalis
Q
R
6.7
6.6
72.0
❑
1985
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.5
6.6
58.0
❑
1986
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
5.7
" (1)
38.0
❑
1987
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
0.6
7.8
62.0
0
1988
Quercus sp.
®
R
0.4
9.0
30.0
❑
1989
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.8
9.1
40.0
1-1
1990
Platanus occidentalis
Q
R
4.1
6.9
58.0
1991
Platanus occidentalis
0
R
1.2
7.1
61.0
mmmvm_-
m-mm_-
_-mm_-
®-m®_-
# stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
A
*SOURCE: Ti--Transplant. L=Live stake, B=7ANIMal,
1nd burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tubling. R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown _ p. 25
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Wmissing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued) •
17021-AXE-0009
Apr 2020 Data
c
THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
y ddh
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
* (mm)
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-0ff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species A subsam ftf!**:
ei ht Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name 21
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES
— DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
sap]
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifcrt-off>10cmor subsample?100%. * 3 **4 *"5 � �7 8 � 10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
■ ti■ *0 go i �M*r
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling. R=bare Root; M=Mechanically; U=Unknown _ _ p. 26
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MpWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CAS-EEPEntry Tool ver.1.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0009
Y:
(0,0) X:5ni
X-axis: 47 ° 4 stems: 18
N map size:
LARGE
0/
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted .Tu=TublinR, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 27
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3
a

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0010
VMD Year (1-5): � Date:
/ /
=p
Taxonomic Standard:
via (� g1
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
35.304723 Datum: 'NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
r�s
-78.126095 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 65
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.Im O.lm lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
818
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
0.0
0.4
100.0
828
Quercus sp.
R
2.5
2.0
30.0
831
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
5.0
0.0
39.0
1993
Frai^�� PI 0�
®
R
0.1
4.5
20.0
1994
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
2.1
5.0
40.0
1995
Quercus lyrata
®
R
5.4
2.5
30.0
❑
1996
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0
R
7.5
1.0
38.0
El
1997
Quercus sp.
@
R
8.0
3.0
50.0
El
1998
Quercus phellos
®
R
6.5
5.5
38.0
❑
1999
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
9.0
6.2
30.0
2000
Platanus occidentalis
Qj
R
5.3
7.6
60.0
2001
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
7.7
8.4
93.0
❑
2002
Platanus occidentalis
Q
R
9.7
8.6
88.0
Q
2003
Quercus sp.
Q
R
4.3
10.0
28.0
❑
2004
Platatius, occ dentalis-
Q
R
1.0
7.0
68.0
❑
2005
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
3.3
7.2
82.0
❑
2006
Quercus sp.
®
R
1.2
6.2
30.0
❑
2007
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.7
6.7
62.0
El
2008
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
4.1
5.5
32.0
El
# stems: 19 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (in) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake, B=Ball and burls P=Potted, Tu=_Tubling; R_bare Root. M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 21
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, Strangulation,
DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, NIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0010 Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
l xjdanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species Zj& subsiundinE**:
1 ieiL hM Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name 0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 em-
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub_
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
J::
**Required ifcitoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. ■I
■2
■
* 3
■■
!!4
■■
N5
■■
rf,
■
10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted. Tu=Tubling. R=bare Root, M=Mechanically. U=Unknown p. 29
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0010
X-axis: 65 °
N # stems: 19
i map size:
0 LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root ,.M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 30
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, i *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUgbt, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0011
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard: !✓� C6 - I(
Taxonomic Standard DATE: -j5D ( J
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304757 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) - `'r °
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.126589 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m)• I X-Axis bearing (deg): 68
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
ElCheck box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
I
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m O.lm lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
839
Acer rubrum
®
R
1.2
2.2
21.0
1683
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
4.2
1.7
51.0
El
2010
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.4
4.9
38.0
❑
2011
Prunus serotina
Q
R
3.3
4.1
40.0
2012
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
6.8
1.9
53.0
2013
Platanus occidentahs
®
R
9.7
2.3
72.0
El
2014
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
8.8
4.2
88.0
❑
2015
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
5.9
4.2
42.0
2016
Quercus shumardii
R
6.5
0.3
41.0
2017
Quercus phellos
O
1Z
6.3
2.8
28.0
El
2018
Linodendron tulipifera
R
9.4
6.9
63.0
❑
2019
Quercus lyrata
Q
R
6.2
6.8
30.0
❑
2020
Quercus phellos
O
R
8.0
8.9
32.0
El
Quercus phellos
0
R
5.5
9.1
42.0
2022
Quercus phellos
®
R
2.3
9.0
40.0
❑
2023
Quercus lyrata
O
R
1.6
7.1
49.0
2024
Quercus sp.
O
R
4.0
6.6
38.0
11
_-0©_-
m-m
# stems: 17 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (PITanted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (in) (in) I cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
a n �t A
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stak B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted. Tu=Tubling R=bare Root. M=Mechanically, U=Unknown _ _ p. 31
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, AN1Mal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to IOcm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0011 Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH D ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
on
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species Exnlanati of cut-off& subsampline**:
iieiq=htCut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required if cutoff>10cmor subsample?100%. rl
:2 19903
��
00
Hi
•a
6
•
7
s
10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tt—Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanical , U=Unknown P 32
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0011
Y:5m
(0,0)
I
X:5in
— X-axis: 68 *
N # stems: 17
r-,! map size:
01/�'1 LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tublini& R=bare Root, M=Mechanically U=Unknown _ _ p, 33
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, { ANIMal, Human TRAMplod, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CYS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0012
VMD Year (1-5): Pi-] Date: / / /
Taxonomic Standard: t✓tr"(jeve
Taxonomic Standard DATE: c
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304799 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) L'0
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.127462 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): I X-Axis bearing (deg): 34
Date last planted:
New I nting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10El plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
o _
Map Source* X Y Height DBH r Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
853
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
1.3
1.7
72.0
855
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
0.3
4.5
51.0
857
Quercus phellos
®
R
4.0
0.7
42.0
❑
2026
Liriodendron tulipifera
©
R
4.0
0.7
42.0
2027
Quercus sp.
O
R
5.0
4.0
31.0
2028
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.6
5.4
52.0
2029
Quercus sp.
R
5.9
1.3
26.0
2030
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
8.1
1.4
70.0
❑
2031
Platanus occidentalis
O
li
7.9
3.6
62.0
❑
2032
Platanus occidentalis
R
7.5
5.8
73.0
❑
2033
Platanus occidentalis
R
7.0
7.5
73.0
❑
2034
Pnmus serotina
®
R
10.0
8.0
70.0
❑
2035
Quercus phellos
Q
R
2.3
5.8
50.0
2036
Rhus glabra
R
1.6
8.1
40.0
❑
2037
Quercus sp.
Q
R
4.0
7.3
40.0
❑
2038
Quercus sp.
®
R
3.9
10.0
41.0
❑
EM"WNM�
mmlmlmm-
FM
-"M_-
mml■l©m�
mm
"E
wm�■
# stems: 16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 34
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIV_ESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0012 Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
a
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species A suN�°�E�rt-0ff
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ lOcm ❑SOcm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifciioff>1Ocmorsubsample?100%. 401I
02
i
+3
i■
!!4
S•
NS
•■
fi7R]i0
/
Form W S2, v er 9.1
*SOURCE: Tt—Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tublino R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 35
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LNESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0012
Y:
-------------------- ------— --------------- - - - - -,
;There are multiple stems represented by
;some letters, shown in bold on the map.
(0.0) X:5m
X-axis: 34 ° # stems: 16
11j map size:
0 LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B_=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tublin& R=bare Root, _M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 36
*VIGOR: 4--excellent, 3=good, 2—fair, Strangulation,
DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, NIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0013
VMD Year (1-5): F�-] Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304528 Datum:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.127462 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m)• 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 4
Date last planted:
New laming date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y:
❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
871
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
1.4
0.4
57.0
❑
872
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.9
3.4
78.0
❑
2040
Acer rubrum
®
R
3.7
0.3
40.0
❑
2041
Acer rubrum
O
R
3.0
3.1
32.0
❑
2042
Acer rubrum
O
R
6.3
0.7
38.0
❑
2043
Acer rubrum
O
R
5.8
3.3
38.0
❑
2044
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
8.3
1.4
33.0
❑
2045
Acer rubrum
Q
R
8.0
1.4
22.0
❑
2046
Prunus serotina
®
R
7.6
6.6
30.0
2047
Prunus serotina
O
R
8.1
9.1
30.0
❑
2048
Acer rubrum
©
R
5.8
6.0
38.0
❑
2049
Platanus occidentalis
R
5.5
9.1
67.0
❑
2050
Quercus sp.
®
R
3.1
9.4
55.0
❑
2051
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
1.4
9.3
28.0
❑
2052
Quercus sp.
O
R
2.9
6.1
38.0
❑
2053
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
1.0
6.5
82.0
❑
MMINIM_-
m-mm_-
®MIUMM
-"m_-
# stems: 16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (Im) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake: B_ =Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tublina• R=bare Root, MMechanicallyTU=Unknown p. 37
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to IOcm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0013 Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamolina**:
i htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. ff>10cm,explain why tothe right.): ❑ 10cm ❑50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required if citoff >10cm or subsample ? 100%. 01
* 2
O 3 1004
*45
6
7
8I:Z
10 Form W S2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant. L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P_=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mec_hanically2 U=Unknown _ _ p. 38
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0013
Y:5
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 4 ° # stems: 16
0- map size:
N LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr—Tran cant L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, =Potted. Tu=Tubling. R=bare Root. M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p, 39
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, i *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0014
VMD Year (1-5): F_�] Date:
Taxonomic Standard:��-�1
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304723 Datum: NAD831W
(dec.deg. or m)-78.127462 UTM Zone:u
Longitude or UTM-E: 11L��J11
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 45I
Date last planted: o4i2u2u
New lancing date m/yy? J
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
i
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * Icm* 1 cm sprout
885
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
©
R
1.8
2.2
79.0
890
Liriodendron tulipifera
R
0.4
5.1
40.0
El
892
Pious taeda
®
R
0.9
3.7
20.0
894
Pious taeda
®
R
3.1
3.8
23.0
895
Quercus lyrata
Q
R
5.1
0.3
38.0
1686
Quercus sp.
®
R
6.6
1.0
42.0
1687
Betula nigra
Q
R
9.0
0.6
92.0
2055
Querci u*q (4 (A,�
Q
R
10.0
1.1
48.0
2056
Quercus sp.
R
8.7
1.8
52.0
❑
2057
Pinus taeda
Qj
R
5.8
4.2
20.0
❑
2058
Prunus serotina
R
7.9
4.6
21.0
❑
2059
Quercus nigra
R
8.8
3.8
50.0
❑
2060
Rhus glabra
®
R
7.2
8.0
30.0
ID
2061
Quercus phellos
Q
R
5.8
10.0
38.0
❑
2062
Liriodendron tulipifera
0
R
5.2
7.6
20.0
El
2063
Pinus taeda
©
R
3.4
7.6
22.0
El
2064
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
1.0
7.9
10.0
El
2065
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
1.2
8.5
28.0
El
uln
�n©■��
# stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tq-Tubling, R=bare Root. M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 40
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWmg, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0014 Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH # ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamWing**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorterthan thisare ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 5 cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sap,
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. O1
•2
03
•�
*4
rf
HS
41,0
6
8
�1
�l0 FomiWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tublinp, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown _ p. 41
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, Strangulation,
DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=deadNIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEnoy Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0014
i - -
Y:5n i
(0,0)
r
I
a
no
X-axis: 45 * # stems: 18
^,N map size. -
LARGE
1'
N
O
X:5m
1
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root. M=Mechanicall , U=Unknown P 42
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 17021-AXE-0015
VMD Year (1-5): 1-�-] Date:
Taxonomic Standard: k9(,
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.305233 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.129006 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): I X-Axis bearing (deg): 16
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
P'1
Aotc:
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy.
Check box if plot was not
votes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* I cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
902
Quercus sp.
Q
R
1.6
0.9
68.0
903
Quercus sp.
Q
R
2.6
1.1
58.0
❑
905
Acer rubrum
0
R
3.7
1.7
56.0
El
906
Quercus phellos
Q
R
3.6
2.8
52.0
El
908
Acer rubrum
®
R
2.8
2.8
42.0
El
909
Quercus sp.
®
R
1.6
4.3
10.0
910
Quercus phellos
@
R
5.0
1.1
61.0
El
911
Quercus nigra
9
R
6.7
2.6
71.0
El
912
Quercus sp.
®
k
5.7
4.2
84.0
❑
913
Taxodium distichum
0
R
8.5
3.9
92.0
❑
914
Quercus sp.
@
R
8.4
4.3
58.0
❑
915
Quercus rubra
Q
R
6.4
6.0
90.0
❑
916
Quercus nigra
@
R
7.0
6.5
79.0
El
917
Quercus nigra
Q
R
8.1
9.6
50.0
El
918
Taxodium distichum
®
R
5.4
9.2
61.0
El
919
Quercus nigra
R
5.3
6.1
40.0
920
Quercus phellos
®
R
1.4
6.2
73.0
El
1689
Quercus phellos
0
R
0.6
7.5
60.0
1690
Quercus sp.
O
R
2.2
9.8
82.0
El
2066
Quercus rubra
Q
R
3.4
8.1
25.0
❑
=n���
# stems: 20 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Some* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant. L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tubling. R=bare Root, M=Mecbanically, U=Unknown _ -p. 43
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, Mowing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0015 Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
a
map source X Y ddb Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsam g**:
Lie l htCut-Off(All stems shorterthanthis are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10CM El50Cm ❑ 100cm El137Cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
sum
sap]
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifctioff>Iocmorsubsample?100%. 101
*2
+r
• 3 *4
*N �
N5
0•
ht:=:
S
+
10 FomrWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanicallv. U=Unknown p. 44
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIM 1, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0015
)7:5
X-axis: 16 ° # stems: 20
0--
map size:
N LARGE
(0,0) x:5m
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant . L=Live stake B—Ball and burlap, P=Potted. Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 45
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0016
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE: < f G
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304818 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.129273 UTM Zone:
Ll
1 X-Axis bearing de
Coordinate Accuracy (m): g (deg): 18
PLUM.
Date last planted: �04/2020
New lanting date m/yy? I�•�
Check box if plot was not
votes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
F Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m O.lm lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
926
Quercus sp.
O
R
0.8
2.9
50.0
927
Quercus sp. (41
R
2.4
5.1
42.0
928
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
3.5
3.2
72.0
❑
931
Carya sp.
Q
R
3.9
3.8
42.0
❑
932
Quercus phellos
®
R
4.2
1.4
30.0
❑
933
Quercus phellos
R
5.3
3.8
51.0
❑
1692
Quercus phellos
R
6.7
0.9
60.0
2068
Quercus rubra
O
R
6.7
3.4
48.0
2069
Quercus phellos
R
7.7
0.0
41.0
❑
2070
Quercus phellos
O
R
8.6
2.2
58.0
❑
2071
Quercus phellos
R
9.5
4.6
30.0
2072
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.2
6.4
25.0
2073
Quercus phellos
®
R
7.1
8.8
30.0
El
2074
Quercus sp. ( . "
O
R
4.1
7.2
58.0
❑
2075
Quercus sp. f
O
R
5.2
9.8
42.0
❑
2076
J
Quercus nigra
®
R
2.3
8.3
108.0
DBH? ❑
# stems: 16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Pla ted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* g
X Y Height DBH Vigor* Damage* Notes
(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm g
*SOURCE-. Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root. M=Mechanicall U=Unknown _ p. 46
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMobal, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LP✓ESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0016 Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH F, ddh Height DBH Re
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout Vigor Damage Notes
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamnling**:
lei'htCut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 1 Cm ❑ SOCm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137Cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm- _
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm SSaapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write lDsll)
**Required if cuto117>10cm or subsample?100%. ■1 0 0 * ::4 !!5 6 7 g 10 Form WS2,va9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tubling, R=bare Ro_ot M=Mechanically . U=Unknown p 47
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Otber/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUgbt, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Wmissing. I Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to loom if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntryTool ver. 2.3.1
c

Map of stems oA plot 17021-AXE-0016 x-axis: 18, 4 stems: 16
N
map sue:
l 0
LARGE
rv—
Y:5w
iz
(0,0)
X:5m
*SOURCE: Tt=Trans lant L=Live stake, B=B_all and burlaRP:—Potted, Tu=TublinR, R=bare Root, MMechanically: =Unknown p. 48
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to IOcm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

f. Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 17021-AXE-0017
VMD Year (1-5): a Date: / /
Taxonomic Standard:) .
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304561 Datum: 1,AD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.129833 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 38
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
r -- d 04/2020
dL ly.
Date last plante . �--�
New planting date m/yy? ♦_�
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
936
Quercus nigra
®
R
0.8
0.5
112.0
DBH?
939
Ulmus americana
R
2.5
0.8
30.0
940
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
3.9
0.2
50.0
11
941
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.3
3.4
125.0
DBH?
942
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
2.1
5.3
42.0
El
946
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
6.2
3.9
52.0
El
950
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
6.3
1.5
40.0
❑
2078
Quercus pagoda
®
R
7.5
0.8
123.0
DBH? ❑
2079
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
9.1
2.2
18.0
El
2080
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
8.6
4.2
82.0
El
2081
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
5.2
5.4
43.0
2082
Liriodendron tulipifera
@
R
9.3
5.3
42.0
❑
2083
Pinus taeda
O
R
10.0
8.5
20.0
2084
Pinus taeda
R
9.0
8.1
30.0
2085
Betula nigra
O\~
R
5.4
9.3
120.0
DBH?
2086
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
3.3
8.7
63.0
2087
Pinus taeda
O
R
0.6
8.4
15.0
❑
®NIMQ_�
DWI-
M-101
M-
®
_-�1"M��
011
7
��r■�i1FArr
# stems: 17 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* (m) (m) Il om*t 1DBm Vigor* Damage* Notes
t � �
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling. R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 49
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed In the CYS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0017 Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddb Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamp[in:
Helo IL Cut -Off (All stems shorterthanthisareignored. If>l0cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm 1150cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
sub_
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifctt-off>10emorsubsample?100%. +1
•2
•
a�
•*1
sr
s+,
(+
•
k
1
l.0 FornrWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanicallyl_U=Unknown P. 50
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10em if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0017
Y:
— X-axis: 38 * # stems: 17
N map size:
0 LARGE
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tubling. R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown g. 51
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1
a

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0018 r
VMD Year (1-5): �4 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE: r3�
Latitude or UTM-N: �35.303797 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) rra
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.130011 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 31
Date last planted: 04/2020
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10
❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
958
Prunus serotina
®
R
4.9
0.0
43.0
❑
966
Prunus serotina
R
7.9
1.1
45.0
❑
1694
Quercus pagoda
®
R
2.3
1.0
52.0
❑
2089
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
1.0
3.2
49.0
❑
2090
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
3.7
3.5
60.0
❑
2091
Quercus shumardii
Q
R
6.4
3.2
40.0
❑
2092
Quercus shumardii
Q
R
9.3
4.0
22.0
❑
2093
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
6.3
6.0
43.0
❑
2094
Quercus pagoda
®
R
9.0
6.1
62.0
❑
2095
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
7.3
9.0
61.0
❑
2096
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
0.7
6.9
52.0
❑
2097
Quercus pagoda
O
R
3.3
6.9
42.0
❑
2098
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
0.9
9.2
42.0
❑
2099
Quercus pagoda
®
R
4.7
9.5
35.0
❑
2100
Quercus pagoda
O
R
9.2
9.2
61.0
❑
# stems:
15 New Stems, not included
last year, but
are obviously planted.
If more space
_-lm-_-
mmnom��
=Mmml
m�
mmlmlm®-
omuom�
_-1m,m_-
m-mm_-
MMWIMM�=
mmn��;
®mv�i��
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root. M=Mechanically= U=Unknown p. 52
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMaI, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0018 Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
ESrulanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampng**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than thisare ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ IOcm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
21
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
I
**Required ifcu-off >10cm or subsample? 100
:2
•
■�
HS
• 4640
r6
S
+
�i 0 Form W S2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr—Transplans Lr-Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanical U=Unknown p. 53
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0018
C
)':5ni
(0,0)
X:5m
X-axis: 31 °
# stems: 15
N map size:
� LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap P=Potted, Tu=Tubling R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please till in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0019 r
VMD Year (1-5): F-41 Date: UV
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.303336 Datum; 'NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) �-v
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.128896 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): I X-Axis bearing (deg): 14
Date last planted: 04/2020
New lanting date m/yy? r
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
' Plot Dimensions: X:
10 Y; 10 El plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1m lcm* I cm Icm* 1 cm sprout g g
2102
Quercus sp.
0
R
3.0
2.2
40.0
2103
Quercus sp.
Q
R
0.5
2.4
52.0
2104
Quercus rubra
0
R
2.8
0.5
109.0
DBH?
2105
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
1.1
4.9
150.0
0.3
2106
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
4.3
4.7
128.0
DBH?
2107
�;R, ((ri
"
®
R
6.3
2.3
40.0
2108
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
@
R
6.6
3.9
161.0
0.2
2109
Quercus phellos
R
8.5
2.5
32.0
El
2110
Rhus glabra
Q
R
8.9
6.8
50.0
2111
Quercus sp.
O
R
10.0
5.5
50.0
El
2112
Pinus taeda
O
R
6.9
6.4
25.0
El
2113
Quercus shumardii
O
R
6.0
8.5
158.0
0.2 ❑
2114
Pinus taeda
Q
R
5.5
9.2
29.0
2115
Quercus sp. ; tWj
®
R
7.8
9.0
i
2116
Quercus sp.
O
R
9.5
9.0
43.0
❑
2117
Pinus taeda
O
R
1.0
9.0
28.0
11
1
2118
Quercus sp. (f h , .'
®
R
2.9
9.1
42.0
2119
P
Quercus sp.
Q
R
4.4
6.6
48.0
2120
Pinus taeda
®
R
1.9
6.7
60.0
i
lEl
# stems: 19 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. IMore space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
o
*SOURCE: Ti-Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tublina, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically,.U=Unknown _ _ p. 55
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
17021-AXE-0019
Apr 2020 Data
z
0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re
(cm) (cm) sprout Vigor* Damage Notes
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & substungUp**:
el h Cut-Off(Allstemsshorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ IOcm ❑ SOcm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137Cm
Species Name 0
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
Sap,
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcut-off >Iocmor subsample? 100%. it
:2
•
• 3
00
• /4
/ •
�5
•r
6 7 R
!>i
10 Form WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Ti—Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically. U=Unknown p. 56
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LNESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEnny Tool ver. 2.3.1
h

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0019
Y:51
(0.0) X:5m
X-axis: 14 * # stems: 19
0 map size:
� N LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stakerB=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubhng, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown _ p. 57
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to loom if>2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0020
VMD Year (1-5): 4❑ Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.303833 Datum: iNAD8YW
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:-79.129123 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 34
Date last planted: 04/2020
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name chair_ 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
2122
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
0.0
1.0
80.0
❑
2123
Quercus phellos
®
It
0.1
3.1
91.0
El
2124
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
1.8
3.1
91.0
❑
2125
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
2.1
1.0
90.0
❑
2126
Prunus sp.
®T
R
4.0
1.3
28.0
2127
Liriodendron tulipifera
()
K
2.0
5.8
30.0
F7
2128
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
0.0
4.2
32.0
2129
Qaerensre tic, !I
@
Iz
5.6
2.8
32.0
❑
2130
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
I:
8.1
0.9
38.0
2131
Cehis occidentalis
®
I<.
7.2
4.4
22.0
2132
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
8.9
4.4
168.0
0.2 ❑
2133
Prunus sp.
R
9.3
5.5
18.0
0
2134
Liriodendron tulipifera
0
R
4.5
6.3
10.0
❑
2135
Liriodendron tulipifera
0
R
6.8
7.7
29.0
❑
2136
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
4.1
9.1
10.0
❑
2137
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
1.7
8.8
100.0
❑
m-0®_-
m®mm_-
m®lum_-
m®mm_-
_-lwl®_-
_-m®_-
m-m©_-
®-m®_-
®-imm_-
�M
_■m_
®_-
# stems: 16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr_-Transplan , L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown ! 58
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0020 Apr 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species ubsan► fi ga*:
iei htCut-Oti(Allsternsshorterthanthisareignored. If >10cm, explain whytotheright): ❑ 1 cm ❑ 5 cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 1 7cm
Species Name
0
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required if cutoff>10cmor subsample?100%. ■1
■2
■
■;
•■
•4
•
!■1
■■
#6
■
7
8
10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr—Transplan, Ll--Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown _ _ p. 59
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0020 x-axis: 34' # stems: 16
N map size:
0 LARGE
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:_Tt=Transplant; L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Roo_; M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4--excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other[Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased,
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
p. 60
VINE
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
vowe,
Please till in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0021
VMD Year (1-5): Fz] Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE: r t o
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304523 I Datum: 'NAD83/7
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.128711 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): I X-Axis bearing (deg): 18
Date last planted: 04/2020
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10I Y; F 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
2139
Quercus sp.
O
R
2.6
0.0
59.0
❑
2140
Quercus sp.
O
I,'
2.7
0.7
98.0
El
2141
Quercus sp.
O
R
5.0
0.9
82.0
❑
2142
Quercus sp.
O
K
4.8
1.5
39.0
❑
2143
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
1.8
3.8
72.0
2144
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
ob
R
3.5
4.3
122.0
DBH? ❑
2145
Corpus amomum
O
R
1.8
4.2
70.0
El
2146
Pinus taeda
®
R
6.3
3.5
20.0
❑
2147
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
8.1
3.7
129.0
DBH?
2148
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
6.3
5.8
100.0
❑
2149
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
8.6
1.3
22.0
2150
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.6
3.4
40.0
2151
Pinus taeda
O
R
6.9
5.8
20.0
❑
2152
Pinus taeda
(p
R
7.0
8.4
32.0
2153
Quercus rubra
@
R
7.3
9.0
128.0
DBH?
2154
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
©
R
4.8
6.1
125.0
DBH?
2155
Pious taeda
®
R
3.1
6.0
30.0
2156
Cornus amomum
0
R
4.6
7.9
40.0
❑
2157
Acer rubrum
®
R
1.0
9.1
42.0
❑
2158
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
2.3
6.2
141.0
0.3
®i
■Dim
®i
■Di��
®i
■Di®�
�iL■7
��
ON
�1
I
1E,
WA_-
fflwmmm=_-
�iL■
mmJm
milli®�
mil■lmmm�
# stems: 20 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Pla ted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Ti-Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlat4 P Potteid Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanicalh . U=Unknown _ P.. 61
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0022
VMD Year (1-5): ❑4 Date: / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: �35.303885 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) ' 'Vo
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.128097 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 7
Kom:
Date last planted: 04/2020
New lanting date m/yy? L�
L_jCheck box if plot was not
Votes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Apr 2020 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
2160
Quercus phellos
@
R
0.6
1.0
76.0
❑
2161
Rhus glabra
R
1.5
1.3
40.0
❑
2162
Acer rubrum
®
R
1.1
3.6
22.0
❑
2163
Quercus sp.
®
R
3.5
1.4
30.0
❑
2164
Pinus taeda
O
R
6.1
0.3
22.0
❑
2165
Quercus sp.
n
R
6.3
3.3
20.0
❑
2166
Pinus taeda
O
R
8.8
1.2
10.0
❑
2167
Pinus taeda
0
R
8.8
3.4
32.0
11
2168
Pinus taeda
R
6.3
6.3
35.0
❑
2169
Prunus serotina
R
8.8
5.7
10.0
❑
2170
Prunus sp.
R
8.8
8.5
28.0
❑
2171
Pinus taeda
®
R
6.6
8.9
30.0
❑
2172
Quercus phellos
0
R
3.8
6.3
30.0
❑
2173
Rhus glabra
Q
R
1.2
5.8
32.0
❑
2174
Pinus taeda
®
R
1.1
9.5
28.0
❑
2175
Pinus taeda
@
R
1.1
7.4
42.0
❑
2176
Uwe -wnr
®
R
3.7
8.8
42.0
❑
# stems: 17 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted; Tu=Tublins. R=bare Root, M=Mechanically. U=Unknown p. 64
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to loom if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0022
)':5
X-axis: 7 ° # stems: 17
Cmap size:
N LARGE
(0,0) a:5n,
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant .L=Live stake, B=Ball and burl
*Vs P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanicay, U=Unknown p. 66
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, Strangulation,
DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, NIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to loom if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Appendix D.
Remedial Activities
Weaver Farm Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Ray Holz
From:
Merritt, Katie <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Tuesday, January 15, 2019 4:25 PM
To:
Ray Holz
Cc:
Matthew Harrell
Subject:
RE: [External] RE: Weaver Farm Year 1 review -
Hey Raymond,
By copy of this correspondence, the Year 1 monitoring report is approved and the remediation plan with the
modifications noted below is also approved. Based on your performance bond #22BSBHT4261, the bond term ends with
the approval of the Year 1 Monitoring Report. Therefore, please provide DWR with a continuation certificate extending
the bond through next year's monitoring year. Once I receive confirmation of renewal, I will issue a credit release letter.
Thank you,
Katie
From: Ray Holz <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:09 PM
To: Merritt, Katie <[e-mail]>
Cc: Matthew Harrell <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: Weaver Farm Year 1 review-
• MA, real .email. Do not click links or open attachments unless y;ou.��rif iecl 5cficl a.li. �gspiciouS.e ail as a .atl' , a e to•
. .
Katie — thank you for the review and for catching the cypress - that was an oversight on our part. Although I would love
to pant cypress, because they will not count towards success, we will instead plant 1,000 Quercus appropriate to the
target natural community (300 Q. laurifolia, 300 Q. lyrata, 400 Q. michauxii).
As for the maple, we understand and agree with the general DWR policy of not planting red maple (Acer rubrum), given
its abundance and prolific nature. However, in this specific case, a portion of the site (Zone 1 on the Remedial Action &
Maintenance Map) demonstrates such impaired soil conditions that we believe including red maple is justified and
beneficial.
While we have completed intensive soil remediation in this —5-acre area (lime, disc, herbaceous seed), there is still some
question about how fertile the soil is where the turkey houses area once stood. In the 2018 monitoring season, this area
was notable for poor tree survival and sparse herbaceous cover.
Red maple is known to tolerate a wide variety of site conditions, even growing on poor sites such as mining spoils. We
consider its inclusion in the planting mix an important part of reclaiming this particular area in a timely fashion. We plan
to plant 200 red maple/acre in Zone 1. That will constitute 1/3rd of the stems/acre planted this year in that zone. The
additional 400 stems/acre will be a mix of the other species on our remedial planting list. The combination will allow
Zone 1 to meet success criteria moving forward by establishing an adequately dense and diverse native hardwood
community despite the difficult soil condition.
Please do not hesitate to give me a call if you would to discuss any part of this plan in greater detail.
Sincerely,
Raymond Holz.
Raymond J. Holz I Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211 1 Raleigh, NC 27604
tel:[phone] cell:919.604.9314 1 fax:[phone]

email: [e-mail]
From: Merritt, Katie[mailto:katie.merritt@ncdenrgav]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2019 2:58 PM
To: Ray Holz <rholz a restorationsystems.com>
Subject: Weaver Farm Year 1 review -
Hey Raymond,
I have finalized my review of the Year 1 Monitoring Report for the Weaver Farm Mitigation Site. Thank you for providing
a remedial action plan in response to the impacts to the site associated with Hurricane Florence. I do have concerns
with the proposed planting plan, considering not all the trees are part of the original approved planting plan. It is
proposed in the report, to plant the following species: Acer rubrum, Liriodendron tulipifera, Quercus nigra, Ulmus
Americana and Taxodium distichum. Three of the five species chosen, are not part of the approved planting plan. Acer
rubrum is not usually accepted as a preferable species to plant on riparian buffer sites due to its ability to colonize
rapidly, potentially outcompete other planted stems and possibly produce a monoculture. Ulmus Americana is an
acceptable species to plant on this site and DWR approves the use of this tree in the remediation plan. Taxodium
distichum is not a hardwood tree and would not be allowed to use towards the performance standards, which require
"native hardwood tree species".
Due to the special nature of this site, DWR will allow alternative species of trees to be planted for the
remediation. However, RS is required to provide DWR with a specific reason as to why Acer rubrum should be planted
on this site. This must include site -specific characteristics that warrant the use of Acer rubrum over other species
approved in the planting plan in the BPDP. Nursery availability of stems will not be considered a reasonable explanation
to use Acer rubrum on the site. Additionally, RS must acknowledge in writing, they understand that Taxodium distichum
will be excluded from counting towards the performance standards on the site. Otherwise, RS must choose a different
species from the original planting plan in the BPDP.
Once I have received a response to this email, I will be able to issue a credit release.
Thank You,
Katie
""please note my phone number has changed"
Katie Merritt
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: 919-707-3637
Work Cell: 919-500-0683
Website: http:llportal.ncdenr.ordweb/wq/401bufferpermitting
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27620
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records L,aw and may be disclosed to third parties.

Rav Holz
From: Ray Holz
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 12:23 PM
To: Katie Merritt - NC DENR - DWR ([e-mail])
Subject: Weaver Farm - Remedial Action Implementation Summary
Attachments: Weaver Farm —Remedial Action Plan_Implementation Summary.pdf
Katie —
RS completed the remedial action work at Weaver Farm on February 24t''. Please find attached a summary of the work
completed. I have also updated a copy to the DWR edocs website.
At your earliest convenience, I would like to schedule a site visit to both Weaver Farm and Pancho.
Thank you for the time,
RH
Raymond J. Holz I Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211 1 Raleigh, NC 27604
tel:[phone] cell:919.604.9314 1 fax:[phone]
email: [e-mail]

Weaver Farm — Remedial Action Plan Implementation

Weaver Farm — Remedial Action Plan Implementation
Species List of replanting
Zone 1
# of Stem
Date Completed
Red Maple
1,000
02/24/19
River Birch
500
02/24/19
Yellow Poplar
1,000
02/24/19
Overcup Oak
500
02/24/19
Water Oak
500
02/24/19
American Elm
500
02/24/19
Bald Cypress
300
02/24/19
White Oak
500
02/24/19
Zone 2
River Birch
500
02/24/19
Yellow Poplar
1,000
02/24/19
Overcup Oak
300
02/24/19
Water Oak
500
02/24/19
American Elm
400
02/24/19
Bald Cypress
1,000
02/24/19
Total 8,500

Weaver Farm — Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 02/24/2019
Herbaceous establishment in footprint of old turkey houses
Herbaceous establishment in footprint of old turkey houses

Weaver Farm — Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 02/24/2019
Herbaceous establishment & replanting in footprint of old turkey houses
Herbaceous establishment & replanting in footprint of old turkey houses

Weaver Farm — Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 02/24/2019
Herbaceous establishment & replanting in footprint of old turkey houses
Replanting in Zone 2 outside of old turkey houses (near Vegetation Plot 7)

Weaver Farm — Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 02/24/2019
Replanting in Zone 2 outside of old turkey houses (near Vegetation Plot 12)
Replanting in Zone 2 outside of old turkey houses (near Vegetation Plot 10 & 11)

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY19-SL001200
°°'"TURE Predictive
Client:
Josh Merritt
Advisor:
Raymond Holz
120 Singlton Street
1101 Haynes St
x Soil Report
Mehlich-3 Extraction
Raleigh, NC 27606
Raleigh, NC 27604
k
Sampled County : Sampson
Links to Helpful Information
Sampled: 07/21/2018
Received: 07/23/2018
Farm: Weaver Farm
Completed: 07/27/2018
Client ID: 489322
Advisor ID: 489323
Sample ID: WEAV1
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1- Hardwood, E
0.3 0 0
0 0
0
0 0
Note: 11
2- Hardwood, M
0.0 80-120 0
0 0
0
0 0
Note: 11
Test Results [units - W/V in g/crrr3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/drr73]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.76 1.31 7.9 75 2.0 5.3
283 477 33 12
243 72
192
192
165 0.5 6
Sample ID: WEAV2
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1- Hardwood, E
0.4 0 0
0 0
0
0 0
Note: 11
2- Hardwood, M
0.0 80-120 0
0 0
0
0 0
Note: 11
Test Results [units - W/V in g/crrr3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dn7 ]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.76 1.22 8.4 72 2.4 5.3
644 87 55 12
45 114
770
770
936 0.1 1
North Carolina
x
AL
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is
being funded through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY19-SL001200
Josh Merritt
Page 2 of 2
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Lime
Ac
exchangeable acidity
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
B
boron
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at onE
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
CEC
cation exchange capacity
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
K-1
potassium index
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
K20
potash
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-1 and P-1 values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
MIN
mineral soil class
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-1 levels appear
Mn
manganese
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I
manganese index
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
Mn-
mineral -organic soil class
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients_ In general, homeowners do not
N
nitrogen
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Na
sodium
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
NO3-N
nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
pH
current soil pH
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/obpart4.htn sfind information that
P-1
phosphorus index
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
P205
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
W/V
weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
Zn-1
zinc index
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routine)
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/uvrst.htm

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No.
FY20-SL010766
Client:
Matthew Harrell
Advisor:
Predictive
441 Weaver Rd
Goldsboro, NC 27530
+_ Soil Report Mehlich-3 Extraction
Sampled County : Wayne
Links to Helpful Information
Client ID: 503761
Advisor ID:
Sampled: Received: 10/21/2019 Completed: 10/29/2019 Farm:
Sample ID: BUILD
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1- Hardwood, E 0.0 0 0
0
0
0
0 0
Note: 11
2.00 tons/acre; 11/2018
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.41 1.24 14.7 89 1.6 5.3 463 864 38 22
269 137
305
305
240 1.1
7
Sample ID: SIDA
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1- Hardwood, E 0.0 0 0
0
0
0
0 0
Note: 11
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.46 1.16 8.0 78 1.7 5.5 498 87 61 12
42 209
927
927
858 0.1
1
Noah Carolina
i
I Awl'
Futacii frum fuWCixrlml5skm
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY20-SLO10766
Matthew Harrell
Page 2 of 2
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Lime
Ac
exchangeable acidity
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
B
boron
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at onE
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
CEC
cation exchange capacity
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
K-1
potassium index
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
K20
potash
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-1 and P-1 values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
MIN
mineral soil class
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-1 levels appear
Mn
manganese
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I
manganese index
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
Mn-
mineral -organic soil class
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients_ In general, homeowners do not
N
nitrogen
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Na
sodium
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
NO3-N
nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
pH
current soil pH
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncagr.pov/apronomi/obpart4.htrntfsfind information that
P-1
phosphorus index
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
P205
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
W/V
weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
Zn-I
zinc index
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinel
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit www.ncagr.pov/agronomi/uyrst.htm

Weaver Farm — Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation
A complete replant of the site with bare -root stock at a rate of 680 trees/acre will be conducted this
planting season. Before planting, a narrow set ripping/bedding plow will be used to prepare planting
rows sitewide. This plow will disturb about 24" wide every 8' across the site. The bedding action will
release surface compaction and incorporate organic material into the soil. The ripping portion of the
plow will promote deeper root growth and release deeper compaction. A narrow plow will be used to
minimize the disturbance. In addition, lime will be applied sitewide. IRS has secured and plans to plant
the following species.
Species
Number
Acer rubrum
1500
Celtis occidentalis
100
Celtis laevigata
500
Cornus amomum
300
Liriodendron tulipifera
3,000
Pinus taeda
2,000
Platanus occidentalis
3,000
Prunus laurocerasus
500
Prunus serotina
500
Ptelea trifoliate
500
Quercus lyrata
800
Quercus phellos
2,500
Quercus shumardii
700
Rhus glabra
500
Viburnum dentatum
500
Totals:
16900
*RS recognizes that Pinus taeda would not count under the CMB rule, we're simply trying to see if
anything will grow.
IRS is in the process of collecting baseline data, which will be detailed in the Yr. 3 Monitoring report
along with an end of the year typical vegetation monitoring survey.
Remedial Work
Ripping/bedding plow
Plan tin g
Soil Amendments
Baseline Tree Counts
Date Completed
Week of March 16th , 2020
March 241h, 2020
Ongoing
By end of April 2020

Weaver Farm —Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation
First photo series is of ripping/bedding work done by plow
, y-
Photo Date:04/02/2020
Q �/r
74
Page 2

Weaver Farm —Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 04/02/2020
Ripping/bedding work done by plow
Page 3

Weaver Farm —Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 04/02/2020
Ripping/bedding work done by plow
N
y/
4

Weaver Farm —Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 04/02/2020
Ripping/bedding work done by plow
3 •.. �'�« =✓ ' sip§ 1�� , W � g
y ,

Weaver Farm —Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 04/02/2020
Ripping/bedding work done by plow & planting details
=I White arrow on replanted stems
'�j^TPi�A$A::dbR�.4' i^`1_`""1!";. 9y': ._j. .. ..: •�iL'�9$iNi,Yl6'3..e�r.
n
Surviving planted stem from 1 t
remedialwork '`` ,'➢ ' x h z
%

Weaver Farm —Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 04/02/2020
Planting details
i
White arrow on replanted stems
r_Y''
i
4 Pyres' -r � �' s,-: �',fi,: � I � ? • '�, .
Y j �Nj
yn
'.. �2V �^ ✓ J' � � #fix .
-
1! A �
Bare root planting March 24th 2Pt
020 i
Page 7

Weaver Farm —Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 04/02/2020
Ripping/bedding work done by plow
White arrow on replanted stems
Bare root planting, March 24th, 2020
White arrow on replanted stems
MWI
n
Bare root planting, March 2V, 2020