090134_Inspection_20200814

71e 5 � .,-J
r .;r y. •Division of Water'Resources° ;,
Faculty Number J�.- /?� '1'
Q Divisioniof Soil and Water Conservation
d - O Other Agency . `.-
Type of Visit: a Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral-0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: VAIFZI '? Arrival Time: 'd Departure Time:I/7,; p County: rpt v-, Region: FT.0
Farm Name: i vL / Y ( Owner Email:
Owner Name: ,a,S b f/y LA-
4 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: /140/60-+-‘. } 7 nc9, Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: �l tires Integrator: G ;:,(1- {-f-.1D'
Certified Operator: 4107,444.6 M f Certification Number: /6.7,_ (,
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current ` Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop: a Cattle Capacity =Pop
Wean to Finish - Layer Dairy Cow
•
Wean to Feeder60-0 .c Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish . Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder .D Pouf . Ca 1 aci Po 1.„ Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Beef Stocker
Gilts , II Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder _ _
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
li I EZZI :-
Other Turke Poults
Other •Other --o ` • a_
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes - No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 11E(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - l jlG( Date of Inspection: g" ,
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No DNA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 30
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Erces ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Ell< ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 1V V ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [r]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 4/4
13. Soil Type(s): t�l��-- . ��j d� 1)00,`fik
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes laN< ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes El<TO ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 12NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [i]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes El-3<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - /pi Date of Inspection: g�//1 -sA
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑/\No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes E 1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document El Yes Ergo El NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes �o El NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I2Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes ❑' O El NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ErNo El NA El NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes fNo El NA El NE
Comments(refer to question#):`Explain any YES answers an d/orany additional recommendationsFor any otliejdomments'
Use draVngs;of_facility-to bettefiXplaiOituations(use,a4ditionaIp40;as necessary) _ P _ _
t .; y—t'ro• tt.'4/ - 4 ✓►jws
•
•
•
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: 0—�? 1,61
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015