090130_Inspection_20191217

kl -,2-0/ a 7 ',Jar a
ebivision of Water Resources
Facility Number - /3 D 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: G Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: • outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: l2/2-�p Arrival Time: /U,'L7 Departure Time: 4;7p County: ork
Region: Fr D
Farm Name: 'Gt Ul,U j i.-. b+l'Gt4tch. Jt.o ., Owner Email:
Owner Name: yt,►;1, f,c1. teX )Jt(1(4^*i7 --tl1a Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: r-t _e,,G?iu/�� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: �ju� Integrator: , ?-ytl . .
Certified Operator: Certification Number: Z.f//h.
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: - Latitude: " Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish - Layer Dairy Cow
r>lcrean to Feeder 60,ed 9049 Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy •
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults i
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts ./
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA El NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
1io//,i�„ cDF��l9

Facility Number: - /,3 V Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard?,-- ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 _
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): /?-
Observed Freeboard(in): rT;2--
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA n NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes /f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [/]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes PE‹ ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): 2rryaiLa —/�v-ci"�
13. Soil Type(s): Wt201; _/�r'�-,l 9044, .^D /1 /7C;�//ai,�.n—
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? / �' ❑ Yes [/]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [ to ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Ef 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [ to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Er-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes laKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2'�Vaste Application ❑Wee y Freeboard Ell<te Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
ainfall ❑Stocking . -- Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: i - /3[) Date of Inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check Vs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
on-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 1-7 g-Y.___ I
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ? No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ErYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
/Jot,-: 707, y„u JZL lzy�A.✓Gt�=Y L
e- %YS y /�s �� o�.-r s -7 ,
�'�11 r�r �r r 4 / ,
_ ,(7,/Lk,
°'-179117.7, th---4-2' 7471 e0774,--‘7L/t/t-e-AL."-
ir446�j.ti/D //�° i ' . �-�- ''
1 r- ai/.574- 141' l7/57-7C %
� Rrev-0.6 /��/ro�o�/ .
G`l�J l/S�v"9j� J /l Y Sl�rz %�iz� 8/ � ��r e7
-17
urre-..,; loaf/7-7.147.74. 42---e----,119e 6
lipf9a4 yaw—, Si'veb---rOk.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ,�/'� N � � � Phone: '70
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ' Date: 1 /,7
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015