Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG510131_permit issuance_19940531State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director G. Douglas Moore 1022 Oxford Rd. Roxboro, NC 27573 Dear Mr. Moore: �EHNR May 31, 1994 Subject: Permit No. NCO075426 Morristown Grocery Person County In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on December 29, 1994, we are forwarding herewith the subject state - NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated December 6, 1983. If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150E of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 -7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding. Please take notice this permit is not transferable. Part II, EA. addresses the requirements to be followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mr. Greg Nizich at telephone number 919/733-5083. Sincerely, Original Signed By DaXi A. Goo rich .eston Howard, Jr. cc: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA Raleigh Regional Office P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper Permit No. NCO075426 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Little Huff, Inc. is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at Morristown Grocery U. S. Highway 158 west of Surl Person County to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Deep Creek in the Neuse River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, and III hereof. This permit shall become effective July 1, 1994 This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on April 30, 1998 Signed this day May 31, 1994 Original Signed By David A. Goodrich A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director Division of Environmental Management By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Permit No. NC0075426 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET Little Huff, Inc. is hereby authorized to: 1. Continue to operate the existing 0.014 MGD groundwater remediation system consisting of an oil/water separator, aeration tank, air stripper and transfer tank located at Morristown Grocery, U. S. Highway 158, west of Surl, Person County (See Part III of this Permit), and 2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into an unnamed tributary to Deep Creek which is classified Class WS-III NSW waters in the Neuse River Basin. TIMBERLAKE QUADRANGLE 4 'k x\P.- NORTH CAROLINA—PERSON CO. 1140 yk 4% 6�ro c e 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) 1,4 SW/4 ROXBORO 15' OUADRANGLE 78*52'30" ,/CCi ��T,�Q�yla&1 690 'E 55' 2 030 000 FEET 3 6'2 2'3 0" "27 157-3 ;V j, V". V J-\ :950 000 Cem %FEET 7—L Discharge 6M Point 11 10 C < Al, �24 I Z A �' � � '1 • I •�� -� I '� ; � i :r `�" •:•Cem / -. Tpgro 23 6 20' r N '022 7�. Id A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Permit N NC o. 0075426 During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from . outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below: Effluent Characteris Ic. Flow Oil and Grease Toluene Benzene Xylene Ethylbenzene Chronic Toxicity" *Sample locations: E - Effluent Discharge LlmltatlonI Lbs/dav Units {soeclfy Mon,Avg. Daily Max Mon. - Dally Max. 0.014 NM 30.0 mg/I 60.0 mg/I Monitoring Rectulrement9 Measurement Sample *Sample Frequency Type Location Cont. or Weekly Rec or Flow E Monthly Grab E Quarterly Grab E Quarterly Grab E Quarterly Grab E Quarterly Grab E Quarterly Grab E **Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 90%; January, April, July, and October, See Part III, Condition G. Samples for Toluene, Benzene, Xylene and Ethylbenzene should be collected at the same time as the whole effluent toxicity sample. Samples for Benzene, Toluene, and Ethylbenzene shall be analyzed using EPA method 602. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 1/month by grab sample at the effluent. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. Part III Permit No. NC0075426 E. This permit may be modified, or revoked and reissued to include an effluent limitation on nutrients for this discharge depending upon the following: 1. The findings of a study by the Division of Environmental Management determine nutrient control is necessary. 2. Local actions do not successfully reduce the nutrient loading on the receiving waters. 3. The onset of problem conditions in the receiving waters. F. This permit shall be modified, or revoked and reissued to incorporate toxicity limitations and monitoring requirements in the event toxicity testing or other studies conducted on the effluent or receiving stream indicate that detrimental effects may be expected in the receiving stream as a result of this discharge. G. CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAn, PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY) The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in: 1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions. The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality is 90% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of January, April, July and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. All -toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch North Carolina Division of Environmental Management 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, N.C. 27607 Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemicallphysical measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum_. control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate. retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements. )Sow GP — NCGSlal31 PERMIT NO.: NCO075426 PERT ff= NAME: Little Huff, Inc. FACILITY NAME: Morristown Grocery Facility Status: o est�d Permit Status: Renewal Major Minor Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: 0.014 MGD Domestic (% of Flow): Industrial (% of Flow): Comments: 100 % RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Deep Creek Class: WS-III NSW NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION Sub -Basin: 03-04-01 Reference USGS Quad: B23SW (please attach) County: Person Regional Office: Raleigh Regional Office Previous Exp. Date: 6/30/94 Treatment Plant Class: I Classification changes within three miles: Requested by: GreR Nizich Date: 1/5/94 Prepared by: I�CVJ Date: 2 At t VILI Reviewed by: a�' l-j Date: `/ Modeler Date Rec. , # F le-J_ 1 Drainage Area (mi`)-0. 2 5 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 0. 2.3 7Q10 (cfs) 0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs)�30Q2 (cfs)�� Toxicity Limits: IWC q 0 % Acut hmnic Instream Monitoring: Parameters Upstream Location Downstream Location Recommended Lmits Monthly Average Daily Max. Mon. Freq. pH (SU): 6-9 1/mo EL r Oil & Grease (mg/1): 30 60 1/mo EL Benzene (}tgfi): Monitor QUART Toluene (µgA): Monitor QUART Ethylbenzene (µgll): Monitor OUART So W In_aUctions or Conditions should be monitored using an EPA -approved method to a detection level of 1 ppb. This monitoring should coincide with all whole -effluent toxicity monitoring. Permit must contain flow monitoring requirement such that all volumes of wastewater leaving the facility are monitored. Recommend continuous flow monitoring. A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to allow for additional limits on these or other toxicants should the whole - effluent toxicity testing results indicate toxic effects. Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility Status: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Topo Quad: FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Little Huff, Inc. NC007 S H 14 Industrial - 100% Existing Renewal UT to Deep Creek WS-III NSW 030401 Person Raleigh Regional Office Nizich 1/5/94 B23SW Request # 7708 RECEIVED FEB 0 7 1994 ®EHNR-RAL RO Stream Characteristic: USGS # Date: Drainage Area (mi2) Summer 7Q10 (cfs): Winter 7Q10 (cfs): Average Flow (cfs): 30Q2 (cfs): IWC (%): 0208541276 12-88 0.25 0 0 0.23 0 s 100 % z. Wasteload Allocation Summary• (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) Unleaded gasoline is recovered. This WLA is renewed with mostly existing limitations and conditions. However, whole effluent toxicity test limit has been updated to 90% and organics :'0 = ` monitoring requirements is being dropped as per current SOP. Also, MTBE monitoring is �+ recommended as per current SOP. Due to prior granted requests to reduce monitoring frequencies for O & G and pH, a 1/mo monit freq is recommended. A 1 ugh phenols limit (1/mo) was added because facility discharges into WS-III waters. This limitation was omitted in previous WLA's. Current SOP indicate that GW remediation projects should have BTE limitations; however, historical data for this facility indicate less than detection levels for these parameters. Since only BTEX monitoring requirements were required in the previous permit, no BTEX limitations are recommended in this renewal. Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments fro Reviewers: G!1rreqt- -cop w o-' f rin mac" 1" " ! q yr dl Recommended by: ���]a►�_ Date: 2-z Reviewed by Instream Assessment: Regional Supervisor: Permits & Engineerin RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: `T"M" " `-` 2 TOXICS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Type of Toxicity Test: Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) Existing Limit: 99% Recommended Limit: 90% Monitoring Schedule: Jan, Apr, July and Oct Existing, Limits PH (SU): Oil & Grease (mg/1): Quarterly monitoring: Recommended Limits PH (SU): Oil & Grease (mg/1): Benzene (µg/l): Toluene (µg/l): Ethylbenzene (µg/1): Phenols (ug/1) MTBE (ug/1) Mon. Avg. Daily Max. 6-9 30 60 Toluene, Benzene, Xylene, Ethylbenzene, Organics Monthly Average Daily Max. Mon. Freq. 6-9 1/mo 30 60 1/mo Monitor QUART Monitor QUART Monitor QUART 1.0 1/mo Monitor 1/mo (See page three for special monitoring requirements.) Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected Change in 7Q10 data Change in stream classification Relocation of discharge Change in wasteflow New pretreatment information Failing toxicity test Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.) Instream data New regulations/standards/procedures WQ or EL EL EL WQ 1 Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed. No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. +01 MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Adgq,uacy of Existing Treatment Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment facilities? Yes No If no, which parameters cannot be met? Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office recommendations: If no, why not? Special Instructions or Conditions BTE and MTBE parameters should be monitored using an EPA -approved method to a detection level of 1 ppb. This monitoring should coincide with all whole -effluent toxicity monitoring. Permit must contain flow monitoring requirement such that all volumes of wastewater leaving the facility are monitored. Recommend continuous flow monitoring. A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to allow for additional limits on these or other toxicants should the whole - effluent toxicity testing results indicate toxic effects. Explain exact pathway of discharge ( i.e. storm sewer to tributary, etc.) Additional Information attached? Y_ (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments. Whole Efflent Tox requirements Facility Name LA N a Permit # 0 c 0 61 s4 Z-b Pipe # ® � CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY) The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in: 1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions. The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality is a 0 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform u rt r monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty day from the effective date of this permit during the months of Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permittea final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch North Carolina Division of Environmental Management 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, N.C. 27607 Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements. 7Q10 U cfs Permitted Flow 0, o 14 MGD 1WC 1 o o % Basin & Sub -basin b 3 0 q o I ReceivingStrym V T oVg=wCJk­ County Recommended b Date 7. -z --%4 QCL P/F Version 9191