20100657 Ver 1_Application_20100810

, AUG J 0 1010 Aachment G: Low/Minimal Imp1cfi ® 6 5 7
.,._ Bridqe Project Data Sheet
3 Coun Craven
4
5 Number
Description Craven 10
REPLACE BRIDGE 10 OVER BRICE CREEK ON SR 1997 _
6 Basin Neuse
7 Classification - C:Sw:NSW
8 Stream SIN 27-101-40-(J)
9 T inland
10 Size 60'
11 T pe 2-span bridge
12 Existing Structure Size 80' L x 21'W
13 Suff. Rating 50.2
14 P
d S
I 3-span bridge
15 ropose
tructure T
!S 130'L x 33'W
16 S USACE jLF 0
17 tream NCDWO impacts Lf 0
18 USACE Impacts AC 0.005
19 Wetlands Non 404 Impacts AC 0
20
21
NC DWQ Buffers Impacts S CAMA Impacts (SF).
F •: 0
otal 5145 . Ft. Buffer Zone i Impacts = 2960 . Ft. Buffer Zone 2.Im acts = 2185 . R
.
22 Buffer Applicato Required >40 t t) N/A
23 State Stomnvater Permit Re quired (YIN) No
24 Habitat No
25 TB.E S sties Present No
26 Bto Conclusion No effect
27 M
t
i T Anadramous Fish
28 ora
or
um Dates Feb 15 to June 15
29 NativelHatche WA
30 T
t W
t Trout S ies Present WA
31 rou
a
ers Trout Conditions /N N/A
32 WRC Reviewer N/A
33 CAMA IAECs Yes
34 Essential Fish l Habitat No
35 Nav. O nin Existing Bridge 32' Wide x 4.5' High Proposed Bridge 40' Wide x 4.5' Hi h
36 USCGI Permh No
37 Historic Pro rties No
38 Arohaeolo 'cal Resources No
39 Triball i-ands No
40 I Resources No
41 6 LWC Resources No
42 Wild and Scenic River No
43 Federal I Lands No
44 TVAI Area - No
45 FEMA Bu out No

46
FEMAI
Flood Stud
No _
47 USTsI Haz Mats No
48 Relocateas None
49 Location I LAT N 35.009485 Degrees
50 ( LONG W 77.026997 Degrees
51 Project Comments

Completed by
Lead Engin r

Division En ' n tal Otfi r

1CMP2r-1
APPLICATION for
Major nevelopment Pennlt
(last revised 12127106)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name Project Name (if applicable)
North Carolina Department Of Transportation 8.4086, Craven 10 SR 1111,Old Airport Road Road Over
Brice Creek Craven County
Applicant 1: First Name MI Last Name
Jay B. Johnson
Applicant 2: First Name MI Last Name
H additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names li sted.
Mailing Address
PO Box
city
State
1 1587 Greenville NC
ZIP Country one No. FAX No.
27835 1587 us 252-830- 3490 ext. 248 252-830-3341
Street Address (if different from above) City State ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name MI Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name MI Last Name
Mailing Address PO Box City State
ZIP
1
Phone No. 1
-

- ext.
Phone No. 2
- - e)t.
FAX No. Contractor #
Street Address (A dilfemnt from above) City State ZIP
Email
Forth DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 5)
i
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple) Street Address State Rd. 0
Craven SR 1111, Old Airport

Subdivision Name city Road
state Zip
Phone No. Lot No. (a) (it many, attach additional page wrfh list)
ext.
a. In which NC river basin is the project located? b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Neuse Brice Creek
C. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade? d. Name the closest major water bo
project site

SNatuml ?Manmade ?Unknown .
Trent River

e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
I. If applicable, list the planning jurishe proposed
FF
?Yes SNo work f
alls within.
4. Site Description
a. Total length or shoreline on the tract (ft) b. Sae of entire tract (sq.ft) - - -
120' (60' North and 60' South) N/A
c. Sae of individual lot(s) d. Appm)dmate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list) ?NHW or SNWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Maintained Roadside Grasses
I. Man-made features and uses now on tract
Road
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adiaceM to the proposed project site.
Residential Property and Wood Lands
h. How does local govemment zone the tract? i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
N/A (Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
?Yes ?No SNA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? Yes No
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, atach a copy. Yes No NA
If yes, by whom?
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Histodc District or does it involve a Yes No NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site?
u Are there coastal wetlands on the site?
(iii) If yes to either O or (i) above, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, if available)

I

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 5)

APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment
systems.
N/A
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ?Commerctal Publir/Govemment
?Pdvate/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The Existing 18" x 44' RCP Will Be Replaced By 30"x 48' CMP. The Proposed Pipe Will Keep The Roadway From
Collapsing, Thus Preventing Possible Injury and Death.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
The Existing Pipe Will Be Removed and the Proposed Pipe Will Be Installed. Typical Roadway Construction Equipment Will
Be Used, Including, But Not Limited To Tracked Excavators,Dump Trucks, Flat-Bed Truc ks,Back-Hoes,And Boom Trucks.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Bridge Replacement
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Both
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 6755 ®Sq.Ft or ?ACres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area Yes No NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
N/A
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ?Yes No NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ?Yes ?No ?NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? Yes No NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Fortn continues on back>
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) - (t) are ah"ys applicable to any major development application. Please consult the appiicabon
instruction booklet on how to property prepare the required items below
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, dearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.

Forth DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 5)

APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
rWeyerhaeuser the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant dams title to the affected pmpedies
priate application fee. Check or money order mace payable to DENR.
names and txxnplete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
ve received a Copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
ubmit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management
haeuser oompany,inc.
85 Weyerhaeuser Road Vancebom,NC 28586 Parcel #2, Tract 2
Address Ernest L reason and Lisa B. Reason
Name P.O. Box 12386 New Bern, NC 28561 -
Phone No. PDWOW, LLC
Address 5905 Neuse Road Grantsbcro, NC 28529
Name North Carolina Coastal Land Trust
Phone No. 131 Racine drive Suite 101 Wilminton, NC 28403
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permitiee, and issuing dates.
None
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Poliky Ac (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Envimrnnonfm a,.r e.r
i. certtdcatfon and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fad grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date-June 16,2010 Print Name -Jay B. Johnson
Signature
Please indicate application attachments Dertainina to vour nm sent nmirar}

Oorm'DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts) -
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet
Access
Other
Channel

(NLW or Canal Boat Basin Boat Ramp Rock Groin Rock (exclu
ding
NWL Breakwater shoreline
stabilization
Length
Width
Avg. Existing
Depth NA NA
Final Project
Depth NA NA
I. EXCAVATION 0This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
C. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlandsimarsh d. High-ground excavation in cubic yards.
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
?CW ?SAV ?SB
?WL ?None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
12. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL 0This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
C. (1) Do you claim title to disposal area?
?Yes ?No ?NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlandstmarsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
?CW ?SAV ?SB _
?WL ?None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
;t
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ?This section not applicable
(if development is a wood groin, use MP11- Structures)

d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
?Yes ?No ?NA
(fl) If yes, where?
f. (b) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
?Yes ?No ?NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
r
Form DCM MP-2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 2 of 2)
I
a.? Type of shoreline stabilization: b. Length: 120' (60' North And 60' South)
?Bulkhead ®Riprep ?Breakwater/Sill ?ONer. _ Width: T
C. Average distance waterwanl of NHW or NWL 2' d. Maximum distance waterward of NNW or NWL 20'-25-
a. Type of stabilization material:
Class B Mad or Granite
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
?Yes ®No ?NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level. h. Type of fill material.
Bulkhead backfill _ Riprap
Breakwater/Sill- Other_
i. Source of fill material.
Clark's Quarry
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES 123 This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ?Yes No NA
If yes,
Ill Amount of material to be placed in the water _
(iii) Dimensions of fill area
(iv) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
controlled?
Sift Fences and TRSC-B's
c. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
?Yes ONo ?NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
June 16, 2010
Date
B-4086 Craven 10, Sr 1111,01d Airport Road Over Brice Creek,
Bridge Replacement WBS Element Number 33445.1.1
Project Name
Jay B. Johnson
A
plicant Name T
b. (Q Will fill material be placed m coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
?CW ?SAV _ ?SB
?WL ?None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
b. What type of consWdron equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Typical Road Construction Equipment
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ?Yes ®No ?NA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
plicent Signatu
Rim 19M MP-5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES ?This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge: b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
?Commercial ®Public/Govemment ?Private/Community Brice Creek
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
Cored Slab
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ?No f. (1) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ?Yes ONO
If yes, If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 80'
(n") Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 20' (ii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 6.0 (iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed? NWL:
(Explain) All of the Existing Bridge will Be Removed (v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
9. Length of proposed bridge: 125' h. Width of proposed bridge: 32'
L Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ?Yes ONO j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
If yes, explain: increasing the existing navigable opening? ?Yes ONO
If yes, explain:
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 6_5' I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ?Yes ONO
-- If yes, explain:
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: 6.5'
waters? ?Yes ZNO -
If yes, explain:
2. CULVERTS 0This section not applicable
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
3-
0. Number of culverts proposed: _
I
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
< Form continues on bacly

r ,,
Form DCNI MP-5 (bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 4)
c.' Type of culvert (construction material):
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
?Yes ?No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) W dth of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
I. Length of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NNW or NWL
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ?Yes ?No
If yes, explain:
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
?Yes ?No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing cutvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NM or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
9- Width of proposed culvert:
I. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
If yes, explain:
?Yes ?No
3. EXCAVATION and FILL ?This section not applicable
kv •.,F, wo Piemmem or me Proposeo onage or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NM-? ?Yes ONO
If yes, .
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: _
('iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: _
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: _
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
C. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or wlvert require any
high-ground excavation? ®Yes ?No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 2T South 15' North
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 23' South 25' North
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 2.0'
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 149
Cubic Yards
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlandalmarsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
?CW _ ?SAV ?SB _
OWL 229 . Ft. ?None "
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Bridge Foundation

Form.DCPA NIP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 3 of 4)
'd. If We placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Temporary Spoil Area is in the Existing Road
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: 100' x 200'
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ®Yes ?No (Ifno, attach a lettergrent/ng permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ®Yes ?No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
?CW ?SAV ?WL ?SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ?Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (i) above.
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any f. () Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to fill (other than excavated material described in item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ?Yes ®No be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
If yes, aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(i) Avg. length of area to be filled: (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: _ ?CW ?SAV ?SB

(iv) Purpose of fill: _
?WL ®None
(i) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high-ground? ?Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill:
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
utility lines? ?Yes ®No detour structures? ?Yes ONo
If yes, explain: If yes, explain: -
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification. -

< Form conUrimm on backs
?t
Forrn DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 4)
C. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
ElYes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2 Turbidity Curtains and Silt Fences will be used to retain
sediment on-site
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhce, or hydraulic dredge)?
Typical Bridge Construction Equipment
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
OYes ®No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ®Yes ONo
If yes, complete form MP-2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
June 16,2010
Date
B-4086, Craven 10, SR 1111,01d Airport Road, Bridge
Replacement, Craven County WBS Element Number 33445.1.1
Project Name
Jay B. Johnson
Applicant Name
Applicant Signat

IA?
Tr
lt.: ,
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FOR
B-4086
t` CRAVEN 10
SR 1111, OLD AIRPORT ROAD OVER BRICES' CREE%
J WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 33445.L1
` P NEW BERN USGS QUAD MAP
SHEETNUMBER 12 0FTRESOIL SURVEYOFCR4VENCOUN7T
FIRMPANEL 5496 J
MAPNUMBER 3 72 0549 60 0 J OCTOBER 27, 2009
1 a
g1y CyP j / ? ? .
or?
.! f; ? f
??
(,U1. II -k ?° f 7
7)?,, .v ?R? '1 t,?S
4 B-4086 v
CRAVEN 10 li- Y= 464251.4590
X=2590739.8192
N 77-01.-37 111
35.009485 DEGREES I, r
nly
W 77.026997 DEGREES
f ?? l
1. -L 2tW
y I (
_ ? ?r ? i4 4 yf XK ?' ,
0 6501,300 2,600 3,900 5,200
j Feet j
BRIDGEREPLACEMENT FOR
B-4086
CRAVENIO
SR 1111, OLDAIRPORT ROAD OVER BRICES' CREE%
WBSELEMENTNUMBER 334451.1
NEWBERN USGS QUAD MAP
SHEET NUMBER 12 OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF CRAVEN COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 5496 J
MAP NUMBER 3720549600 J
N ?J10
WE
S
9
B4086
CRAVEN' 10
Y= 464251.4590"
X= 2590739.8192
N 35A-00'34°
W 77'-0137"
N 35.009485 DEGREES
W 77.026997 DEGREES
2401
OCTOBER 27, 2009
0 2,8505,700 11,400 17,100 22,800
Fe
j
Studied Detour Route
NORTH CARMINA DEPARTMWr OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIMMAYS
PROJECT DEVEI.OMERT&
ENvmOM ty wrAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
CRAVEN COUNTY
REPLAd BRIDGE NO. 10 ON SR I I I I
OVER BRICES CREEK
B-4086
' - Figure I I .
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
"S No.
B-4086
33445.1.1
County: Craven
Document:
F.A. No: Funding: ? State X Federal
Federal (USACE) Permit Required? ® Yes El No Permit Type: CAMA or NWP 3/NWP 4
Project Description: Replace existing timber bridge with a proposed 130 foot Long Cored Slab Bridge
on SR 1111, Old Airport Road over Brice's Creek.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Briefdescription ofreview activities, results ofreview, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, historic designations roster, and indexes was undertaken on March 15, 2010.
Based on this review, there are no existing NR properties in the Area of Potential Effects. No properties
are recorded in the project APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
State Historic Preservation Office issued a letter [ May 3, 20021 stating that a file search yielded no
historic resources which would be affected by the proposed project and thus they would have no comment
regarding the proposal.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Map(s), Soil Survey, SHPO letter.
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO SURVEY REOUMED
Project Tracking No. (tmernat Use)
10-03-0157
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
Project Tracking No. (/nterml Use)
I O- 03 -b ISM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: B-4086 County: Craven
WBSNo: 33445.1.1 Document: PCE
F. A. No:
Federal (USACE) Permit Required?
Funding. State X Federal
CAMA GP or Major;
X Yes No Permit Type: NWP 3/14
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 10 on SR 1111 (Old Airport Road) over Brice's Creek
with off-site detour (no improvements planned).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Briefdescription of review activities, results ofreview, and conclusions: HPO quad maps, historic
designations roster, and indexes reviewed on 12 May 2010 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS
properties in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). The county architectural survey (1980) and related
publication recorded no properties of concern in the APE (Peter B. Sandbeck, The Histor cArrlutedure
of New Bem and Craven County, North Carolina (New Bern: Tryon Palace Commission, 1988)). Bridge
replacement project B-4086 reviewed in 2002 by state historic preservation office - see attached letter
of no comment Craven County current GIs mapping, aerial photography, and tax information indicate
mostly wooded parcels in the APE and one house dating to 2003 in the NW quadrant (viewed 12 May
2010). Constructed in 1954, Bridge No. 10 is a single-span, 80-foo4 steel stringer/multi-beam bridge
and is not eligible for the National Register according to the NCDOT Historic Bridge Survey, as it is not
historically, architecturally, or technologically significant. Google Maps "Street View" confirmed
absence of historic structures/landscapes in APE (viewed 12 May 2010). No architectural survey
required for project as currently defined.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: APE centered on existing bridge and
extends 200 feet from centerline to the W and E and 100 feet from either end of the existing bridge to
the N and S to encompass proposed construction activities. While not recent, the county survey is very
welf-executed and records no properties in the APE. County GIS/tax materials and other images
support absence of significant architectural resources. No National Register-fisted or-eligible
properties or other properties of concern are located within the APE.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: APE map; aerial map
BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
N0,9URVEY REQUIRED - Historic Structures
NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist Date
"No Survey Required "formfor Minor Tmnsportatim Projects as Qualified in the 7007 Programmatic Agreement.
NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups
"No Survey Requited"fans for Minor Tvnsponation Pmjeoe os Qualified in the 1007 Ptogmmmmic Agreement.
NCD0TArdmeo1aV & Historic Architecture Groups
Kepiace Bridge #10 on SR 1111 (Old Airport Road) over Brice's Creek
B-4086, WBS #33445.1.1 Not to scale Base map: Craven County GIS
Sutton, Michael W
From: Wilson, Travis W.
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 12:02 PM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Cc: Caldwell, Betty A; Johnson, Jay B
Subject: RE: Bridges'
Attachments: multibrige070303.doc; 2002NRTRS.doc
_? I=?
multibrige07O3O3.d 2002NRTRS.doc
oc (78 KB) (84 KB)
The 2002NRTRS document contains comments for B-4086: this stream
is designated AFSA and these comments are valid. The multibridge 070303document contains
comments for B-4233 and these comments are still valid (no moratorium). However B-4025
comments are also in the multibridge07O303 document but are not accurate. Broomfield
Swamp at this location is designated AFSA and will have a moratorium of Feb 15 to June 15,
also I cannot determine why we requested any RCW review (this may be a cut and paste
error). Let me know if you have any questions.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:25 AM
To: Wilson, Travis W.
Cc: Caldwell, Betty A; Johnson, Jay B
Subject: Bridges
Good Morning Mr. Travis.... Hope you are well on this Thursday Morning..... Division 2 is
planning to replace Craven 10, Beaufort 39, and Pitt 65. We would like to know if these
bridges are anadromous fish locations and if a moratorium exists... please see attachment
for maps.... many thanks.... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
I
TO: William T. Goodwin, Jr., PE, Unit Head
Bridge Replacement & Environmental Analysis Branch
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: May 22, 2002
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacements:
Beaufort County - Bridge No. 77, NC 99, Pantego Creek, B-3611
Beaufort County - Bridge No. 136, SR 1626, Canal, B-4024
Berrie County - Bridge No. 45, SR 1110, Choowatic Creek, B-4026
Brunswick County - Bridge No. 72, NC 179, Jinnys Branch, B4031
Chatham County - Bridge No. 142, SR 2170, Meadow Creek, B-4065
Craven County - Bridge No. 10, SR 1111, Brices Creek, B4086
Cumberland County - Bridge No. 85,1-95 Business, Cape Fear River, B4091
Durham County - Bridge No. 5, SR 1616, Mountain Creek, B-4110
Edgecombe County - Bridge No. 19, SR 1135, Cokey Swamp, B-4111
Franklin County - Bridge No. 15, SR 1106, Little River, B4113
Granville County - Bridge No. 84, SR 1141, Tar River, B-4124
Greene County - Bridge No. 46, SR 1091, Wheat Swamp Creek, B-4125
Greene/Lenoir Cos. - Bridge No. 49, SR 1434, Wheat Swamp Creek, B-4126
Greene County - Bridge No. 43, SR 1438, Rainbow Creek, B-4127
Halifax County - Bridge No. 11, SR 1001, Jacket Swamp, B-4133
Harnett County - Bridge No. 35, NC 42, Norfolk and Southern Railway, B-4137
Hertford County - Bridge No. 67, SR 1118, Ahoskie Creek, B4150
Hyde County - Bridge No. 108, SR 1340, Old State Canal, B4154
Jones County - Bridge No. 7, SR 1129, Big Chinquapin Branch, B4169
Lee County - Bridge No. 4, SR 1423, Gum Fork, B4171
Martin County - Bridge No. 5, SR 1417, Conoho Creek, B-4187
Nash County - Bridge No. 56, SR 1544, Tar River, B4211
Onslow County - Bridge No. 24, US 17, New River, B-4214
Onslow County - Bridge No. 19, NC 210, Stones Creek, B4215
Pamlico County - Bridge No. 65, SR 1304, UT to Neuse River, B4219
Pamlico County - Bridge No. 4, SR 1344, South Prong Bay River, B-4221
Perquimans County - Bridge No. 69, SR 1222, Mill Creek, B-4227
Pitt County - Bridge No. 98, SR 1407, Conetoe Creek, B4234
Pitt County - Bridge No. 118, SR 1538, Grindle Creek, B-4235
Randolph County - Bridge No. 34, SR 1304, Second Creek, B-4242
Bridge Memo 2 May 22, 2002
Randolph County - Bridge No. 257, SR 2824, Vestal Creek, B-4245
Richmond County - Bridge No. 129, SR 1321, Big Mountain Creek, B4247
Sampson County - Bridge No. 150, SR 1006, Little Coharie Creek, B-4268
Sampson County - Bridge No. 191, SR 1845, Great Coharie Creek, B-4272
Vance County - Bridge No. 3, SR 1107, Ruin Creek, B-4298
Wake County - Bridge No. 189, SR 2333, Little River, B-4305
Washington County -Bridge No. 29, SR 1163, Maul Creek, B-4314
Wilson County - Bridge No. 52, SR 1131, Turkey Creek, B-4327
Wilson County - Bridge No. 3, SR 1634, Great Swamp, B- 4328
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
Our standard recommendations for bridge replacement projects of this scope are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. ,Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim
Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.

Bridge Memo
May 22, 2002
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the naturaLthalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels
other than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or
floodplain bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be
reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by
utilizing sills on the upstream and downstream ends to restrict or divert flow to the
base flow barrel(s). Silled barrels should be filled with sediment so as not to cause
noxious or mosquito breeding conditions. Sufficient water depth should be provided
in the base flow barrel(s) during low flows to accommodate fish movement. If
culverts are longer than 40-50 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be
installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This should enhance
aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by maintaining
channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish and other
aquatic organisms. In essence, base flow barrel(s) should provide a continuum of
water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of velocity.
Bridge Memo 4 May 22, 2002
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases
water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and
disrupts aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed
in a manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures
should be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the
area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be utilized as mitigation for the subject project or
other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. Beaufort County - Bridge No. 77, NC 99, Pantego Creek, B-3611
YELLOW LIGHT. Biologists indicate that a bridge is preferred. There is potential for
wetland impacts at this location due to the width of stream and site elevation. Due to the
potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT should closely follow the "Stream
Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage". This includes a moratorium on
work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to June 15.
2. Beaufort County - Bridge No. 136, SR 1626, Canal, B-4024
GREEN LIGHT. No concerns indicated by biologists. Standard conditions should be
appropriate.
3. Beaufort County - Bridge No. 136, SR 1626, Canal, B-4024
GREEN LIGHT. No concerns indicated by biologists. Standard conditions should be
appropriate.
4. Bertie County- Bridge No. 45, S R I 110, Choowatic Creek, B4026
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15.
5. Brunswick County - Bridge No. 72, NC 179, Jinnys Branch, B-4031
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15. There is also the potential for impacts to high quality coastal wetlands at this
location. NCDOT should employ all measures necessary to avoid impacts to these
resources.

Bridge Memo
May 22, 2002
6. Chatham County - Bridge No. 142, SR 2170, Meadow Creek, B4065
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to the Cape Fear
Shiner, NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting
to discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Standard
recommendations apply.
7. Craven County - Bridge No. 10. SR 1111. Brices Creek B-4086
_YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for An moms Fish Passage
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February l5 to
June 15. Biologists indicate that a bridge is preferred. There is also the potential for
impacts to high quality wetlands at this site. NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts
to these wetlands. Other standard recommendations apply.
8. Cumberland County -Bridge No. 85,1-95 Business, Cape Fear River, B-4091
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15. Other standard recommendations apply.
9. Durham County - Bridge No. 5, SR 1616, Mountain Creek, B-4110
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the DWQ water quality classification, we recommend High
Quality Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures be used. Other standard
recommendations apply.
10. Edgecombe County - Bridge No. 19, SR 1135, Cokey Swamp, B-4111
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels,
NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to
discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Standard recommendations
apply.
11. Franklin County - Bridge No. 15, SR 1106, Little River, B-4113
RED LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT should
closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage". This
includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to June 15.
There are records of state and federally listed mussels in the project vicinity. Therefore,
due to the potential for impacts to listed species we request that NCDOT perform a
mussel survey prior to the construction of this bridge. An on-site meeting should be held
with NCWRC and USFWS biologists, prior to the `404' permit application, to discuss
bridge design and construction. We request NCDOT incorporate High Quality
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures into the design of this project. Other
standard recommendations apply.
12. Granville County - Bridge No. 84, SR 1141, Tar River, B-4124
RED LIGHT. The Tar River supports a good fishery for sunfish, therefore, we
recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April 1 to June 15.
There are records of state and federally listed mussels in the project vicinity. Therefore,
due to the potential for impacts to listed species we request that NCDOT perform a
mussel survey prior to the construction of this bridge. An on-site meeting should be held
with NCWRC and USFWS biologists, prior to the `404' permit application, to discuss
bridge design and construction. We request NCDOT incorporate High Quality
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures into the design of this project. Other
standard recommendations apply.
Bridge Memo
May 22, 2002
13. Greene County - Bridge No. 46, SR 1091, Wheat Swamp Creek, B-4125
YELLOW LIGHT. There is the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Standard recommendations
apply.
14. Greene/Lenoir Cos. - Bridge No. 49, SR 1434, Wheat Swamp Creek, B-4126
YELLOW LIGHT. There is the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Standard recommendations
apply.
15. Greene County - Bridge No. 43, SR 1438, Rainbow Creek, B-4127
YELLOW LIGHT. There is the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Standard recommendations
apply.
16. Halifax County -Bridge No. 11, SR 1001, Jacket Swamp, B-4133
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels,
NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to
discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Standard recommendations
apply.
17. Harnett County - Bridge No. 35, NC 42, Norfolk and Southern Railway, B-4137
GREEN LIGHT. No comment.
18. Hertford County - Bridge No. 67, SR 1118, Ahoskie Creek, B-4150
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15. Other standard comments apply.
19. Hyde County - Bridge No. 108, SR 1340, Old State Canal, B4154
GREEN LIGHT. Standard comments apply.
20. Jones County - Bridge No. 7, SR 1129, Big Chinquapin Branch, B-4169
YELLOW LIGHT. Big Chinquapin Branch supports a good fishery for sunfish;
therefore, we recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April 1
to June 15. There is also the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Other standard
recommendations apply.
21. Lee County - Bridge No. 4, SR 1423, Gum Fork, B-4171
GREEN LIGHT. Standard comments apply.
22. Martin County - Bridge No. 5, SR 1417, Conoho Creek, B-4187
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15. Biologists indicate that a bridge is preferred. There is also the potential for
impacts to high quality wetlands at this site. NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts,
to these wetlands. Other standard comments apply.
Bridge Memo
May 22, 2002
YELLOW LIGHT. The Tar River supports a good fishery for sunfish; therefore, we
recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April 1 to June 15.
If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels, NCDOT should
contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to discuss special
measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Other standard recommendations apply.
24. Onslow County - Bridge No. 24, US 17, New River, B-4214
YELLOW LIGHT. The New River is designated as a Primary Nursery Area on the
downstream side of the existing US 17 bridge. Due to the potential for adult and larval
stages of anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT should closely follow the "Stream
Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage". This includes a moratorium on
work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to September 30. Other standard
recommendations apply.
25. Onslow County - Bridge No. 19, NC 210, Stones Creek, B-4215
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15. Biologists indicate that a bridge is preferred. There is also the potential for
impacts to high quality wetlands at this site. NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts
to these wetlands. Other standard comments apply.
26. Pamlico County - Bridge No. 65, SR 1304, UT to Neuse River, B-4219
YELLOW LIGHT. There is the potential for impacts to high quality coastal wetlands at
this location. NCDOT should employ all measures necessary to avoid impacts to these
resources. Other standard comments apply.
27. Pamlico County - Bridge No. 4, SR 1344, South Prong Bay River, B-4221
YELLOW LIGHT. There is the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Other standard comments
apply.
28. Pender County - Bridge No. 21, NC 210, NE Cape Fear River, B-4223
RED LIGHT. There are records of the federally listed Shortnose sturgeon in the NE
Cape Fear in the project area. Due to the potential for anadromous fish and Shortnose
sturgeon at this location, NCDOT should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines
for Anadromous Fish Passage". This includes a moratorium on work within
jurisdictional waters from February 1 to June 15. Biologists indicate that a bridge is
preferred. There is also the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Other standard comments
apply.
29. Perquimans County - Bridge No. 69, SR 1222, UT to Mill Creek, B-4227
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15. There is also the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Other standard comments
apply.
30. Pitt County - Bridge No. 98, SR 1407, Conetoe Creek, B-4234
GREEN LIGHT. Standard comments apply.
31. Pitt County - Bridge No. 118, SR 1538, Grindle Creek, B4235
Bridge Memo 8 May 22, 2002
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels,
NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to
discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. There is also the potential
for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site. NCDOT should avoid or minimize
impacts to these wetlands. Other standard comments apply.
32. Randolph County - Bridge No. 34, SR 1304, Second Creek, B-4242
GREEN LIGHT. Standard comments apply.
33. Randolph County - Bridge No. 257, SR 2824, Vestal Creek, B-4245
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels,
NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to
discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Other standard comments
apply.
34. Richmond County - Bridge No. 129, SR 1321, Big Mountain Creek, B4247
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels,
NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to
discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Other standard comments
apply.
35. Sampson County-Bridge No. 150, SR 1006, Little Coharie Creek, B-4268
YELLOW LIGHT. Little Coharie Creek supports a good fishery for sunfish; therefore,
we recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April 1 to June
15. There is also the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site. NCDOT
should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Other standard comments apply.
36. Sampson County - Bridge No. 191, SR 1845, Great Coharie Creek, B-4272
YELLOW LIGHT. Great Coharie Creek supports a good fishery for sunfish; therefore,
we recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April 1 to June
15. Biologists indicate that a bridge is preferred. There is also the potential for impacts
to high quality wetlands at this site. NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these
wetlands. Other standard comments apply.
37. Vance County - Bridge No. 3, SR 1107, Ruin Creek, B4298
RED LIGHT. There are records of state and federally listed mussels in the project
vicinity. Therefore, due to the potential for impacts to listed species we request that
NCDOT perform a mussel survey prior to the construction of this bridge. An on-site
meeting should be held with NCWRC and USFWS biologists, prior to the `404' permit
application, to discuss bridge design and construction. We request NCDOT incorporate
High Quality Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures into the design of this project.
Other standard recommendations apply.
38. Wake County - Bridge No. 189, SR 2333, Little River, B4305
RED LIGHT. The Little River supports a good fishery for sunfish, therefore, we
recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April 1 to June 15.
There are records of state and federally listed mussels in the project vicinity. Therefore,
due to the potential for impacts to listed species we request that NCDOT perform a
mussel survey prior to the construction of this bridge. An on-site meeting should be held
with NCWRC and USFWS biologists, prior to the `404' permit application, to discuss
bridge design and construction. We request NCDOT incorporate High Quality
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures into the design of this project. Other
standard recommendations apply.
Bridge Memo
May 22, 2002
39. Washington County - Bridge No. 29, SR 1163, Maul Creek, B-4314
GREEN LIGHT. Standard comments apply.
40. Wilson County- Bridge No. 52, SR 1131, Turkey Creek, B-4327
RED LIGHT. Turkey Creek supports a good fishery for sunfish, therefore, we
recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April I to June 15.
There are records of state and federally listed mussels in the project vicinity. Therefore,
due to the potential for impacts to listed species we request that NCDOT perform a
mussel survey prior to the construction of this bridge. An on-site meeting should be held
with NCWRC and USFWS biologists, prior to the `404' permit application, to discuss
bridge design and construction. We request NCDOT incorporate High Quality
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures into the design of this project. Other
standard recommendations apply.
41. Wilson County - Bridge No. 3, SR 1634, Great Swamp, B- 4328
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels,
NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to
discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Other standard
recommendations apply.
NCDOT should routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources in the
vicinity of bridge replacements. Restoring previously disturbed floodplain benches should
narrow and deepen streams previously widened and shallowed during initial bridge installation.
NCDOT should install and maintain sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the
project and prevent wet concrete from contacting water in or entering into these streams.
Replacement of bridges with spanning structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box
culverts, is recommended in most cases. Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along
streambanks and reduce habitat fragmentation.
If you need fiuther assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.
cc: USFWS, Raleigh
O?Of W ATFgOG
h rZ
O ?
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification C Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a . Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. 3 or General Permit (GP) number.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ®No
l d- Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
tg. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below- ® Yes ? No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ® Yes ? No
2. Project Information

2a.
Name of project: B-4086,Craven 10 Bridge To Bridge Replacement SR 1111, Old Airport Road Over
Brice Creek
WBS Element Number 33445.1.1
2b. County: Craven
2c. Nearest municipality / town: New Bem
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: B-4086
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: 105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
3g. Fax no.: 252-830-3341
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b. Name: Jay B. Johnson
4c Business name
(if applicable):
North Carolina Depratment of Transportation
4d. Street address: P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
4f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
4g. Fax no., 252-830-3341
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
Ia. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 8-4086 Craven 10 SR 1111, Old Airport Road Over Brice
Creek
Latitude: N 35.009485 Longitude: - W
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 77.026997
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
tc. Property size: N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Brice Creek
a Tributary of Trent River
ry
proposed project: ,
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water. SC;Sw,NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
SR 1111, Old Airport Road is an un-paved secondary state highway. Woodlands dominate the landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
225 Square Feet (0.005 Acres) of 404 Wetland Impacts For The Bridge To Bridge Replacement.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
60' This site is part of a longer adjacent stream system
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge To Bridge Replacement ; the existing bridge has deteoriated and needs replacing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Existing 80' Long By 21' Wide Timber Bridge will be replaced with a Proposed 130' Long by 33' Wide Cored Slab
Bridge. Excavators, Dump Trucks,and Crane Trucks will be used for the Bridge To Bridge Replacement.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NCDCM
Name (if known): Stephen Lane and Jay B. Johnson Other. NCDOT
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
December,2009
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
? Yes ®No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to 'help file' instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps- 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ® P ? T Fill Bottmland ® Yes ® Corps 0
005
Hardwood Forest ? No ® DWQ .
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 225 Sq.
Ft.0.005 Acres
2h. Comments: 225 Sq. Ft. Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? PEI T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ® P ? T Pilings in Stream Brice Creek ® PER
? INT ? Corps
® DWQ 60' 30'
S4 El P El T El PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 30 LF
3i. Comments: 30 Linear Feet of Stream Impacts
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other. None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. Be. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
Bi ®P ? T Fill Brice Creek ® Nos 755 Sq. Ft. 650 Sq. Ft.
B2 ®P ? T Fill Brice Creek ® No 585 Sq. Ft. 350 Sq. Ft.
B3 ®P ? T Fill Brice Creek ® Nos 990 Sq. Ft. 805 Sq. Ft.
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: See Page 6-A For Total Buffer Impacts
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
511 Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then.individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ?Tor-Pamlico ? Other. None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. Be. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1impact Zone 2impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
B1 ®P ? T B4 Fill Brice Creek ® Nos 630 Sq. Ft. 380 Sq. Ft.
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts 2960 Sq. Ft 2185 Sq. Ft.
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 1e S-
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are 225 Sq. Ft. Wetland Impacts for this Project; Therefore,The Wetland Impacts have been minimized to the greatest
extent feasible, with minimal impacts occurring on the project
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres, .
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6: Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ®No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
-
67c 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: None
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
WA
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stomrwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
i ® Yes ? No
w
thin one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and special Sediment control
Fence will be used to treat Stormwater Runoff from the road. Roadside ditches will
not enter into the buffers; the roadside ditches will sheet flow through vegetated N Yes ? No
uplands before entering into the
buffers. There are no weep holes in the proposed bridge,thus eliminating
stormwater run-off from the proposed bridge deck.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A Roadway/Bridge Project %
2b. Does this project require a Stomrwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stonmwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and special Sediment control Fence will be used to treat Stormwater Runoff from
the road. Roadside ditches will not enter into the buffers; the roadside ditches will sheet flow through vegetated uplands
before entering into the buffers.There are no weep holes in the proposed bridge,thus eliminating stormwater run-off from
the proposed bridge deck.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governments jurisdiction is this project? N/A
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other. N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes N No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stor mwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
N Other. NPDES Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes N No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5a . Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? yes ? No
5b . Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ®yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500), Isolated'
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered 'yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
? Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Determination was made by Mr. Travis Wilson,NCWRC, October 30, 2009
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Mr. Travis Wilson,NCWRC
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCSHPO
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Bridge designed to no-rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson ail ? A?? June 16, 2010
Applicant/Agents Printed Name pt ant/ nts Signature Date
(Agents signature va o ly' a authorization letter from the applicant
i rovided.
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version,
USPS - Track & Confirm
UNfTEDST23TES
J POSTAL SERVlCEo
Page 1 of 1
Home I Help I Sign In
- Track 8 Confirm FAgs
Track & Confirm
Search Results
Label/Receipt Number. 7009 0080 0002 4040 4886
-!
Service(s): Certified Mailry TrackR Confirm
'
Status: Notice Left Enter Label/Receipt Number.
We attempted to deliver your item at 10:33 AM on July 7, 2010 in NEW
BERN, NC 28562 and a notice was left. You may pick up the item at the Gg>
Post Office indicated on the notice, go to wwwusps_com/redelivery., or
call 800-ASK-USPS to arrange for redelivery. If this item is unclaimed
after 30 days then it will be returned to the sender. Information, if
available, is updated periodically throughout the day. Please check again
later.
Detailed Results:
• Notice Left, July 07, 2010,10:33 am, NEW BERN, NC 28562
• Notice Left, July 01, 2010,8:44 am, NEW BERN, NC 28561
• Arrival at Unit, July 01, 2010, 8:44 am, NEW BERN, NC 28562
Notification Options
Track & Confirm by email
Get current event information or updates for your item sent to you or others by email. G`J>
Site Map Customer Service Forms Gov't Services Careers Privacy_Policy Terms of Use Business Customer Gateway
Copyright© 2010 USPS. All Rights Reserved. No FEAR Act EEO Data FOIA
http://trkcnfrml .smi.usps.com/PTSIntemetWeb/InterLabellnquiry.do 7/14/2010
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Signature
item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired.
¦ },
x ? Agent j
Print your name and address on the reverse y
v OPT
? Addressee
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by Printed Name C. Date of Delivery
I
or on the front if space permits. LY Uylsw 4
-2c1-16
1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from ite -
? 0 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: 1:1 No
NG Cods??/ ?,??%fr
?2,AClNE Se/rE/o/
rvice Type
lVl e ,t lAf6:GT All /Jt^ Certified Mail ? Express Mail
J Registered 0 Return Rece ipt for Merchandise
Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
4.
sMcted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes I
2. Article Number
(Transfer from service faoeq 7009 0080 0002 4040 4794
I PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt mz59SO2-M.1sgo.
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete Si ature
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse a ? Agent
x

so that we can r
t
th @-uadressee
urn
e
e card to you.
¦
R c Wed
Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, C. Date of Delivery
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to: D Is tlress different from item 1? ? Yes
e r delivery addre' ,Ibelow: 0 No
Wig N/) LLC. ??? tti I

p !
?9o S ?IEUS£ KC/ .

RANTSbo?0 NC
l 3. Servicill pe ?O
0Renm' al ? ?
?
)
? Registered Receipt for Merchandise I
11 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
605- 2,5 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fes) ? Yes '
2. Article Number . -.- .._. _.. _
;
(Transfer from service iatle9 7_009 00 _
80 0002 4040 4800
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
-
'
102595-02
r.}t54e
d
1:r?

z
W?
kid
zz
(mT=l
b
.?a
L ?

h
oa
?o
N Z
ti
h
N
s
I
W
U
W
Q
x q
U
a
0
/ s
C\j
N
o O
J ?
C
N j
Q `"
w%
I
?o
? o
v
? N
? O
( R
(L ti
? I
OW ? it
iI,
al ?
I
?I
o?
d
F

/ f
I ,? I
i
?I
7q
s X55 ,b

i
REF
?5 LL
h U W /?/
N
N
W
U ?
?LI)
I
2
Wm J
ht ? ® O .® I I §I e I ,? I
xi '_ ... ? I I I I
I
W i m 1°
W O W
vi o U ? ? '..c7
e c m ° m p a e c
C J C p
1 y O 6 O O :7 C O? m N °
? a S U O o ? n -+ o o J o f v
3 3 3 t = ? .a? W ? O o c m o o D ?'
f- iL ? O o o y
U ? N ? LL
p C Q ° V J 'O 'O L O uVll O O R N
v 3 o p o o T m b t9 > ? l7 '°
d ? v ca o c 0 0? v c v c ° v c ? Z' Z In° v °c ? c
o R>R N o_ 1" a a > ? a m p ? o
o p p m m vUi
a
,
?; N N N K O ?"
? ?I I
I m
I
C
W '
h ? W
W ° o
t o o e ='.
i 3 = e
T I a a o _ m e o o c m o
-O -6
`m j U o 3 ????QI o r r
C C_ °1 C m L m m 'y 3 O C O L~ ?j O 0 0 O
F 3 C .L Oa m ` N V) ° C O m O W -i~ m 1
O v v° O o o a n€ p? VI W s °a o `m `o '. ETC C S c a to i
m m = a 1°? b Ti IJ O u'? i i o°. o° mI o u'? gym- f
:: z ?j I y x ? ? i ? I I I l
® I W 41
° m
E c c
e ° c c
E E
? T` T .? L a a W W C ?.
C J J? ?-1< yl y Cm ? L 1-' ? N ? ? O U V_ E -_ O
a, >. ti a o u `? e U O O> j w E o .? Q `m
t a a 3 3 3 3 U 3` °, o o m cm a oc u° o P e r o- v p
a?Q?7 a s v v t r o r `o ° c E a a p ° ° 0 ° a mo- 8 O o e
Q` l9 f o c O[?, l j :Em o a a c a m o u o f 0 € € F€ c ° N N 3 U'? p
o o c u 0 °, ?, $ m w em $ c 9 a a .? a a w a m
iyn? k y?y?? a !V'1 poO p p _Q ° o ° 0 0 0 ° ?``yCV QQc p5 0 0 ?0 Q? MO
Qc
.? ? N eC H mC K qj m. lil ,i] d a d u W 2? d i d d d y` } 1il If1 d O?. O? d W O
4
I 01
I 1
4 ?-? : x I I
I I ?.? 11!__ nl I F1 q n n I I
i.
i Q W.

I`
3
00
mQ
.n
z

l
S ?
?f ?J
6
\e64?? ?
is?
a
z
' Z
d m N
N
O W W M In U
? N v Q Q
?w i zad a
V) rr O fn N N - O
\ / O W U O O a
N
3
a
N
J Q
In M QO 0?
? ? WSW ?S\??Or
rn vo P C? L
OI Z N Z a v a ^ ?O(< 002?QC
C, /1 / /may Q°000^C
Q O`muO
O?
oamwam? / 0p0
r`?woMN< / 2F, OC,
Wm<
/ P
N L O>
V) Z J / O
Z
tr
W ? \ c Om J /
n O Ll
W
0 tn
II I/1 i 4j Co
Nl
O II II
II N p
Cti N3 ~
N 2 Cd II 0 a
Lo zt
m a O? W W W
3 `W N N
3
LLJ o Q W
-M
N
? a
LL
?I N a
ro
? N
O
p p /
S
ZD)
?'uQ'EK
O?I?E q0? _ -) m I
)S ryq'l0 (?mm I
m
`> B?y1 n I I
+ I
U
NM cc ti I
J I
N
(6 s >1
10 I ? A
/1 !I -N, /
I
I /
I >
/
1 >
11 / > . d?
/ I
-N k

1 /
/
II
111
/
/
I /
I'
/
m
I
? G
ORlc?S GP /?

.f' Oq, q4
e
1-
V)
1--
?l
Z
I hl
J ? O
v
O Q W
O
U (D Q N Z
C)
QU O?
I ' _Z {71
-j<
? J
Ana
Q
U
M
F-
0
O
Z
?g z,
`E ; F?
a8 aF
?! a?
I
h6
0.8