20100477 Ver 1_Application_20100617

1®04 0
NWP 3
Bridge: Jones 73 WBS Element Number
2B.205211
?G l?n
sr„?vo? OHO OO
SR 1341, Trentwood Farm Road Over Reedy
Branch Bridge Project Division 2 Maintenance
All Planning documents have been completed including the Minimum Criteria Sheet Form
State: Activities Deemed to Comply with Water Quality Standards.
Local: None
Or
Federal: USACE Nationwide General Permit 3 - Maintenance
State: General Water Quality Certification #3687
Local: None
Project Description
Replace existing 36' long by 19.1' (clear roadway) wide timber deck bridge with timber piles with a
proposed 40' long by 27' (clear roadway) wide reinforced concrete bridge on steel piles. Age of the bridge
and safety inspection reports dictate the need for replacement of this bridge. There will be no impacts to
jurisdictional waters during bridge construction. This project does not involve Section 10 (Rivers and
Harbors Act) navigable waters. This project does not require the completion of a formal PCN but
notification to the Corps is being provided to be included in their database. This conveyance is shown on
the New Bern USGS Quad Map and Sheet Number 7 of the Soil Survey of Jones County. Reedy Branch is
classified as C;Sw;NS W and is in the Lower Neuse 03020204 HUC. The project is located on the FEMA
FIRM Panel 3484 and Map Number 3720348400 K. The channel is 20 feet wide from bank top to bank top
and drains a woodland/agricultural area. No federally protected species or historic resources are found
immediately adjacent to this location.
In order to ensure compliance with best management practices, all attached General and Regional
Conditions a?sociat?d with Nat,- ^n wide Permit 3 and rarer Q::alir • Certification #3637 must be Sllowed.
Keep demolition and construction debris out of the stream. Riprap will not be placed below the
plane of ordinary high water for stabilization. Excavation should be confined to the right of way,
and limited to the minimum amount required to excavate in high ground for the construction of the
new bridge. All excavated material should be removed from the site, placed on existing spoil piles, or
disposed of in farm fields. Any waste material disposed of off-site sball have a reclamation plan.
All Erosion and Sedimentation measures and Maintenance Best Management Practices should be
implemented. I am forwarding a copy to Mr. Andy Blankenship in Roadside Environmental for his perusal
in E&S inspections. The project supervisor should always have this permit package, including the attached
General and Regional Conditions associated with the Nationwide Permit 3 and Water Quality Certification
#3687 on site during the bridge replacement. The project supervisor should notify me immediately if any
questions or concerns should arise before and during construction.
Jay B. Johnson
Division 2 Environmental Officer
[phone] (/ (?\)

O(?'OAFyW A 2F9 (;0
Oli?.57 C
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a . Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c . Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d . Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le . Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ? Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information

2a.
Name of project: Jones 73 Bridge To Bridge Replacement SR 1341, Trentwood Farts Road Over
Reedy Branch
WBS Element Number 2B.205211
2b. County: Jones
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Pollocksville
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. of state
project no: 2B 205211
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: 105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
3g. Fax no.: 252-830-3341
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b. Name: Jay B. Johnson
4c. Business name
('rf applicable): North Carolina Depratment of Transportation
4d. Street address: P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
41'. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
4g. Fax no.: 252-830-3341
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Infornation and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a . Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Jones 73 SR 1341, Trentwood Farm Road Over Reedy
Branch

1b
. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: N 35.044144 Longitude: _-W
77.108924
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: WA acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Reedy Branch, a Tributary of Trent River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water. C;Sw;NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
SR 1341, Trentwood Farm Road is a paved secondary state highway. Woodlands and Agriculture dominate the
landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 Square Feet of 404 Wetland Impacts For The Bridge To Bridge Replacemet.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
60' This site is part of a longer adjacent stream system
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge To Bridge Replacement ; the existing bridge has deteoriated and needs replacing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Existing 36' Long Timber Bridge will be replaced with a Proposed 40' Cored Slab Bridge. Excavators,Dump
Trucks,and Crane Trucks will be used for the Bridge To Bridge Replacement
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Y
project (including all prior phases) in the past es Na ? Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (d known): Jay B. Johnson Other. NCDOT
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
April,2010
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
thi ? Yes
®No ? Unknown
s project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to 'help file' instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version .

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f

Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction _
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
W1 ? PEI T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T
V ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T El Yes El Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ?DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0 Sq. FL
2h. Comments: No 404 Welland Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number -
Permanent (P) or (PER) or
intermittent (Corps - 404, 10
DWQ - non-404 stream
width length
(linear
Temporary (T) _ (INT)? ,
other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? -PER -[] Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0 LF
3i. Comments: 0 Linear Feet of Stream Impacts
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
if there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent(P)or
Temporarv (T)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T -
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
411 Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
6. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.

Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland

number (acres)
of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5E Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
It project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse
? Tar-Pamlico ? Other. None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
B1 ®P ? T Fill Reedy Branch ®El Yes No 655 Sq. Ft. 435 Sq. Ft.
B2 ®P ? T Fill Reedy Branch ® Nos 635 Sq. Ft. 460 Sq. Ft.
B3 ®P ? T Fill Reedy Branch ® Nos 640 Sq. Ft. 435 Sq. Ft.
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: See Page 6-A For Total Buffer Impacts
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary M
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (ate)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
511 Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this forth.
6a.
® Neuse ?Tor-Pamlico ? Other. None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
61 ®P ? T B4 Fill Reedy Branch ® Nos 675 Sq. Ft. 465 Sq. Ft.
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
63 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6b. Total buffer impacts 2605 Sq. Ft. 1795 Sq. Ft. .
6i. Comments:
Pag $ of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are No Wetland Impacts for this Project; Therefore,The Wetland Impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent
feasible, with no impacts occurring on the project
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. IIff yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ? Mitigation bank
El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permitee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permitee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version. 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWq
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires TO Yes ®No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: None
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
penniltee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in4ieu fee fund).
WA
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ®yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb- If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and special Sediment control
Fence will be used to treat Stormwater Runoff from the road. Roadside ditches will ® yes ? No
not enter into the buffers; the roadside ditches will sheet flow through vegetated
uplands before entering into the
buffers.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? WA Roadway/Bridge Project %
2b. Does this project require a Stonnwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. if this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stonmwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and special Sediment control Fence will be used to treat Stormwater Runoff from
the road. Roadside ditches will not enter into the buffers; the roadside ditches will sheet flow through vegetated uplands
before entering into the
buffers.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stonnwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Cerfified Loral Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local govemmenYs jurisdiction is this project? N/A
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other. N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stomrwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006.246
® Other. NPDES Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stoffnwater Review
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form-Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version,,
5a . Does the Stonnwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered 'yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered 'yes' to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ®No
2c. If you answered yes' to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered 'no,' provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Ciearty detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
? Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes No
impacts?

5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ?
Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
HabRat?
Determination was made by Mr. Travis Wiilson,NCWRC, July 14, 2009
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ® Yes ? No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Mr. Travis Wilson,NCWRC
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCSHPO
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Bridge designed to no-rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson June 9, 2010
Applicant(Agenrs Printed Name pli
is Signature Date
(Agent's signature valid ut
horization letter from the applicant
IT

ided.
d.
.
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

a

o?
JONES 73
SR 1341, TRENT WOOD FARM ROAD
OVER REEDY BRANCH
NEW BERN USGS QUAD MAPAND SHEET
NUMBER 7 OF THE SOIL SUR VEY OF JONES COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 5466
MAP NUMBER 3720546600J
JUNE 19 2009
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 2B.205211 0
N ?, rye Roc R n nt
m
m
?o•v?,1 a o ° x
m R , c
w E g?
s n&y O?
S
Qi qR
m°o
a GateWood m ^ O hin9uapin Rd
D

'PO, r
m
Jry1 o
? _" \ t
Ctimp
'- e
% a Rd
25 n
9 v
0 r
o
m° Murp Y
Z

n m
o'
0m
yew

? d
l
i17 Rd o
G?
d
\s\a?
0 C

JONES 73
SR 1341, TRENT WOOD FARMROA D
OVER REEDY BRANCH
Y= 476385.5510
X= 2565972.6003
N 35A_02'--39"
W77^-06'-32"
N35 044144 DEGREES
W 77.108924 DEGREES
FIRMPANEL 3484
MAP NUMBER 37203484008
?a
7,100
NN 3,550 0 7,100 Feet
E
JONES 73
SR 1341, TRENT WOOD FARM ROAD
OVER REEDYBRANCH
NEW BERN USGS QUAD MAPAND SHEET
NUMBER 7 OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF JONES COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 5466
MAP NUMBER 3720546600)
JUNE 19 2009
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 2B.205211 -ZgN- W
E
W7
S
(, ? t ?. t? ry, ..? f e ? 4 `lr `v`im
D, I -recd o\ o^{/ 1 C e p -? / e l i ?-
,
ull n? v ?I
i 1 I 1 _ r:__
7,100 3,550 0 7,100 Feet
Rd
m F 444 J w'
O ?.
T
?i.
1a
JONES 73
SR 1341, TRENT WOOD FARM ROAD
OVER REEDYBRANCH
Y= 476385.5510
X= 2565972.6003
N35^-02'-39"
W 77^-06'-32
N 35.044144 DEGREES
W 77.108924 DEGREES
FIRM PANEL 3484
MAP NUMBER 3720348400K
From: Wilson, Travis w. Jones County Bridges Moratorium txt
sent: Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 9:19 AM
To: Sutton, Michael W
subject: Jones county Bridges
Mike i apologize for the long delay, but i just haven't been around much in the last
several weeks.
For the Jones County Bridges: Bridge #73 over Reedy Branch will have a recommended
moratorium of Feb 15 to June 15. Bridge #'s 51,65,31 do not have moratoriums.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
ID-05 - 0009
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
WBS No: 2B.205211
F.A. No:
Federal (USA CE) Permit Required?
County: Jones
Document:
Funding: X State Federal
X Yes No Permit Type: NWP 3 or 14
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 73 on SR 1341 (Trent Wood Farm Road) over Reedy
Branch with off-site detour (no improvements planned).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: HPO quad maps, historic
designations roster, and indexes reviewed on 18 May 2010 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or
SS properties in the Area of Potential Effects (APE), which, like the existing bridge, spans the
Jones/Craven countyline. The Jones County architectural survey dates to 1996-1999 and
recorded no properties in the APE. The Craven County survey (1980-1983) and related
publication also include no properties in the APE (Peter B. sandbeck, The HistancArrhttec6ae of New
Bem and Craven County, North Cantina (New Bern: Tryon Palace Commission, 1988). Jones and Craven
Counties current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information indicate largely
wooded parcels adjacent to the present bridge, as well as several domestic and industrial
buildings and structures dating to the 1990s and later standing well to the NE and SE
(viewed 18 May 2010). Constructed in 1958, Bridge No. 73 is a 36-foot-long, single-span,
steel stringer/multi-beam bridge and is not eligible for the National Register according to
the NCDOT Historic Bridge Survey as it is not historically, architecturally, or technologically
significant Google Maps "Street View" confirmed absence of historic structures/landscapes
in APE (viewed 18 May 2010). No architectural survey required for project as currently
defined.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: APE centered on existing bridge and
extends 100 feet from centerline to the N and S and 200 feet from either end of the bridge to
the E and W, encompassing the proposed project limits and ROW requirements, While not
recent, the county surveys are well-executed and record no properties in the APE. County
GIS/tax materials and other images support absence of significant architectural resources.
No National Register-listed or -eligible properties or other properties of concern are located
within the APE.
BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO AURVEY REQUIRED - Historic Structures
NCDOT Cultural Resources
"No Survey Regnired" forn for Minor Tmasp nrtatioo Praie as QualjW in 1142007 Programmatic Agreement
NCDOT Archaeology & Hisioric Archieeunrc Groups
Project Tracking No. (Interwl Use)
F10-05-0009
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: 2B.205211
WBS No: 2B.20521 I
F.A. No:
Federal (USA CE) Permit Required?
County: Jones
Document:
Funding: ® State Federal
® Yes ? No Permit Type: NWP 3 orNWP 14
Project Description: Replace Bridge #73 , an existing 36 foot long by 19.1 foot Timber Bridge with a
proposed 40 foot Cored Slab Bridge on SR 1341, Trent Wood Farm over Reedy Branch.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Briefdescription of review activities, results ofreview, and conclusions:
Review of UFO quad maps, historic designations roster, and indexes was undertaken on 5/27/2010. No
properties appear to be present in the project APE. A survey for water system improvements which
included the SR 1004 portion of the proposed project recorded no sites (Clearinghouse 05-2707).
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis far reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The proposed project calls for all improvements to the existing roadway to be carried out within the
existing right of way. Bridge #73 will be replaced in place with an off-site detour during construction.
No new location will be impacted by the proposed project. No further work is warranted.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Map(s), Soil Survey, Photos.
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO SURVEY REQUIRED
"No Survey Required" f- for Minor Transportation Projects as Qtmli(ed in the 1007 Programmoric Agreement.
NCDOTArdmeo&V & Historic Arddtectore Groups
PERMIT & SPECIAL INFORMATION
Federal (USACE) Permit Required.- ® YES ? NO
Permit Locations shown on map submitted: ® YES ? NO ? N/A (No Permits)
Type of Permit: NWP 3 orNWP 14 Number of Permits: 1
Easements Required: ? YES . ® NO
Temporary or Permanent: ? Temporary ? Permanent
Easements shown on map submitted: ? YES ? NO ® N/A (No Easements)
USFS Property: ? YES ® NO
USES Rating: ? LOW ? MODERATE ? HIGH ? RATING SHEET ATTACHED
New signalization: N/A
Offsite facilities required: N/A
ATTACHMENTS
® Vicinity Map ® USGS Quad Map ® Design Plans ® Photos
? Agency Input Letters ? NCDOT Input Letters ? Scoping Meeting Minutes
® Aerial Photograph with Study Area, Project Termini, and Y-Lines indicated
® Other: Detour Route, Bridge Report, Soils Map
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Archaeology:
Historic
Architecture:
Note:
Please Send Reviews To Mike Sutton
SUBMIT (Z) COPIES OF THIS FORMAND ATTACHMENTS TO
NCDOTHUMANENVIRONMENT UNIT .
Project Tmckmg No. (Internal Use)
REQUEST FOR CULTURAL o - o j cao9
RESOURCES REVIEW FORM
MEMORANDUM TO: Drew Joyner, Human Environment Unit
1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
ATTENTION: Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor
Mary Pope Furr, Historic Architecture Supervisor
FROM: First Last Mike Sutton
Title Division 2 Environmental Specialist
SUBJECT: Request for Cultural Resources Review On Jones 73 SR 1341, Trent
Wood Farm Road Over Reedy Branch Bridge to Bridge Replacement Jones County
DATE: May 12,2010
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: 2B.205211 County: Jones
WBSNo: 2B.205211 Document.- Minimum Criteria Sheet
F. A. No: N/A Funding: ® State ? Federal
USGS Quad: New Bern USGS Quad Map Sheet Number 7 of The Soil Survey of Jones County
Project Description.-Jones 73, Replace Existing 36' Long by 19.1 ' Wide Timber Bridge Bridge with
Proposed 40' Cored Slab Bridge ; SR 1341, Trent Wood Farm Road Over Reedy Branch Please see
Recommended Structure on the Hydraulics Report
Purpose & Need: The purpose of this project is to replace the Existing Bridge with a Proposed Bridge
SCHEDULING AND CONTACT INFORMATION
Date Needed: July, 2010
Engineer: John Hughes
DESIGN INFORMATION
Project Length: 100 Feet
Exist R/W.• 60'
Exist. Speed Limit:
Exist. X-Section:
Detour Route:
Structure Type:
55
See Hydro Review
Proposed Speed Limit. 55
SR 1340 For 0.3 Miles to the Craven County Line and SR 1144 for0.5
Miles,then SR 1920 For 0.8 Miles,Then SR 1004 for 0.2 Miles,then SR
1145 then SR 1341, Jones County. No Improvements to be Made on
Detour Route
Timber Deck on Timber Year Built: N/A
Pilings
Tel [phone] Email [e-mail]
Proposed RIW. 60'
n m v?
N 03
N ry g n ®® cn ui y NO
a
F; cz
C->???2rn I I y s o 2?1a
'ry^ mtNnp2?nrjoi N ?/ ~ rn n vryi o '~^ ?nn~
tp) O CN' O o N I I oy y G rn cryn T o 02
rrl
4 n?a N m = I I o~ g? U) Q
0
`OO?C-) I I O O, N (rij
l7l cni I I lj W O 2 y
ego I I; I k N rnmm
rr,
co k r
I I ?j ° CZ C-) T into ? OC,.t
U) g ? rr, r" n? o
Rjl O m N ?I IS ?o r 3 ?m nl
00 r"
CID
c;) rr, rnzE -,j
?j 2 m rn G 00 ?-J
ril??? rn tiro
f so ?z?
n
m
0 + °
o wo
o r2
ryo z . mm? N
O
Na q n0 i a O? ?V
Mm o m 0 JONES COUNT
JONES COUNTY
CRAVEN COUNTY "m? O CRAVEN COUNTY - 0
2T LV ?A ?A ¢9 ?
ry? Vt? a fTl
O ?o ryo o a N ° o
g?N ? ? + m? N v?0 00
Ha O m w o_ vn oN
nA
W --? o z? Orn ?n
_ `i?o? V M 2 m rN- c
ry $ A
? Nm N m cn O o n? $O m OD
N r,
-q (A
N:70Cn_I a C Gm o v ti uWi g
?n ° a' T v ° ?ry o rn? ?' n mN n
I?D
??0? cn y r -1?z
° n i U y ?CCO? t
Uj? ? O NO _p O? `v "s o N rn?Ur y N O l9zO g
N cn o oai rn rrlV '° x 2rn N '? ° OV2k2n
I ?, ?°,oot
T ° CT (n !Tj I^ I 26 Q 2 ?rn IUN??N
(Z.:o w x
a l
WBS ELEMENT 28205211
CROSS SECTION OF
BRIDGE NUMBER 73
EXISTING BRIDGE:
l SPAN @ 35'--7"
19.1' CLEAR ROADWAY
O.A.L. = 36'
SR 1341, TRENTWOOD FARM ROAD, OVER REEDY BRANCH
JONES COUNTY
1341
WS ELEV. 490.8
EXISTING HEADWALL
BED ELEV. 4873
i

EXISTING HEADNALL
PROPOSED 21" CONCRETE CORED SLAB
PROPOSED LENGTH = l @ 40' SPAN
27' CLEAR ROADWAY
O.A.L. 40'
NO DECK DRAINS
SR 1341
e 497.9
WS ELEV. 4908
BED ELEV. 487.5

No.
RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE
la 40' CORED SLAB
z
W
N
2W
(] U
SR /Uy
TREyf W470S FMy RRbgp
I
0
XiST/AC RM
-- r

?I W
C
U
.eL wn.s .x .
IRP RAP
AS FEOED
Q
.am3

? WS
__ A'e/RPyy '/Y740

?C Rim

NA[ARBQI$ Soil BALI CNE'
WR BA
SiRY. QIS7iC1n0A
s>s.N wws v. Vs w m
.9
.l MP N.ML .? >W I R10%Y .4
.?.A.1i QITf}Y.
OI[ f?Y.lirls` V
tlf! ?
•...I.... ,I.A rww
N.C.D.O.T.
IYM01V OF HIGHR
-- -- - JOAW COUNTY
A&G.# 73 ON 9t 1715 O
ABHDY fipm.H CRRI
__ _ _ _ rulc r. >.ao1a