WI0400074_Conceptual Site Model Revision_20130203

CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
REVISION
DECEMBER 2012
BE AEROSPACE FACILITY
1455 FAIRCHILD ROAD
WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
BE AEROSPACE, INC.
1400 CORPORATE CENTER WAY
WELLINGTON, FLORIDA
PREPARED BY:
CRB GEOLOGICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
8744 S.W. 133" STREET
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33176
DECEMBER 23, 2012
RECEIVEDIDENR1DWO
FEB 04 ?013
Aquifer Protectim Section

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................I
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION..............................................................................................................2
2.1 TOPOGRAPHY.................................................................................................................2
2.2 GEOLOGY.........................................................................................................................2
2.2.1 Regional Geology...............................................................................................2
2.2.2 Site -Specific Geology.........................................................................................2
2.2.3 Cross Section.......................................................................................................3
2.2.4 Faults and Structure............................................................................................3
2.3 HYDROGEOLOGY...........................................................................................................3
2.3.1 Regional Hydrogeology......................................................................................3
2.3.2 Site -Specific Hydrogeology
................................................................................4
3.0 SITE ASSESSMENT...............................................................................................................6
3.1
SOIL ASSESSMENT
.........................................................................................................6
3.1.1
Former HWSA....................................................................................................6
3.1.2
Solid Waste Management Units..........................................................................7
3.2
SOIL GAS
ASSESSMENT................................................................................................8
3.2.1
HWSA Soil Gas..................................................................................................8
3.2.2
CYA Soil Gas ......................................................................................................8
3.2.3
FFS Soil Gas .......................................................................................................9
3.3
GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT..................................................................................9
3.3.1
Groundwater Elevation Monitoring....................................................................9
3.3.2
Groundwater Monitoring..................................................................................10
3.3.3
Groundwater Analytical Results.......................................................................10
3.3.4
Courtyard Area Groundwater Results...............................................................10
3.3.5
Former Fairchild Storage Shed Area.................................................................11
3.3.6
Northwest Area.................................................................................................11
3.3.7
Hazardous Waste Storage Area.........................................................................12
3.4
SURFACE
WATER ASSESSMENT...............................................................................12
4.0 LAND USE
ASSESSMENT..................................................................................................14
4.1
SITE REGULATORY RECORDS..................................................................................14
4.2
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW...............................................................................14
4.2.1
The Site.............................................................................................................14
4.3
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.....................................................................................16
4.3.1
Forsyth County Garage - 1202 Fairchild Road.................................................16
4.3.2
Sun Chemical - 1100 Fairchild Road................................................................17
4.3.3
Decodex —1105 Fairchild Road........................................................................18
4.3.4
Forsyth County Airport Commission — Fairchild Road....................................18
4.3.5
Wachovia Oil Co. - 1095 Fairchild Road..........................................................18
4.3.6
Dixie Concrete - 3300 N. Liberty Street...........................................................19
4.3.7
Norfolk and Western Railway Co. - 3000 North Liberty Street .......................19
4.3.8
Davco, Inc. - 3001 North Liberty Street...........................................................19
4.3.9
Airport Exxon - 3751 North Liberty Street.......................................................20
BEA 414-02
i CRB Geological & Environmental Services,
Inc.

4.3.10 Piedmont Aviation Services - 3821 North Liberty Street.................................20
4.3.11 USAir Maintenance Facility - 4001 North Liberty Street................................20
4.3.12 Sam's Curbside Market - 4215 North Liberty Street........................................21
4.4 INTERVIEWS..................................................................................................................21
4.4.1 The Site.............................................................................................................21
4.4.2 Airport Landfill.................................................................................................21
4.4.3 Decodex, 1105 Fairchild Road..........................................................................22
5.0 POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
...........................................................................23
5.1.1 Surface Water....................................................................................................23
5.1.2 Public Water Supply.........................................................................................23
5.1.3 Private Water Supply Wells..............................................................................23
5.2 MIGRATION PATHWAYS............................................................................................23
5.2.1 Utility Drainage Survey....................................................................................24
5.2.2 Groundwater Migration.....................................................................................24
5.3 CONCLUSIONS..............................................................................................................24
5.4 LAND USE CONCLUSIONS..........................................................................................24
6.0 REMEDIAL ACTION EVALUATION..............................................................................25
6.1 REMEDIAL ACTION HISTORY...................................................................................25
6.2 SOIL REMEDIATION.....................................................................................................25
6.2.1 Hazardous Waste Storage Area.........................................................................25
6.2.2 Solid Waste Management Units........................................................................27
6.2.3 Soil Vapor Extraction........................................................................................28
6.3 GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION..............................................................................28
6.3.1 Aeration Wells..................................................................................................28
6.3.2 In -Situ Reductive Dechlorination
.....................................................................28
7.0 REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................29
Tables
Table 1 — Monitoring Well Construction Summary and Groundwater Elevations
Table 2 — Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 3 — Groundwater Physical Parameters
Table 4 — Surface Water Analytical Results
Table 5 — Summary of Waste Management Units
Figures
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Site Map
Figure 3 - Site Topographic Map
Figure 4 - Regional Cross -Section Locator Map
Figure 5 - Regional Hydrogeologic Cross -Section C-C'
Figure 6 - Site and Surrounding Area Map
Figure 7 - Site -specific Geological Cross Section Locator Map
Figure 8 - Site Cross Section A -A'
Figure 9 - Site Cross Section B-B'
Figure 10 - Site Cross Section C-C'
BEA 414-02 ii CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

Figure 11 - Site Generalized Cross Section D-D'
Figure 12 - Bedrock Elevation Contour Map
Figure 13 - Groundwater Elevation Contour Map, April 2, 2012
Figure 14 - Underground Drainage Layout
Figure 15 - Soil Gas Sampling Locations
Figure 16 - PCE in Soil Gas — May 1997
Figure 17 - PCE in Groundwater
Figure 18 - Remediation Areas
Appendices
Appendix I —
Regulatory Correspondence
Appendix II
— Tables
Appendix III
— Figures
Appendix IV
— Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Report
Appendix V
— Bioremediation Injection Log — UIC Permit
Appendix IV
— PCE Concentrations Trend Charts
BEA 414-02 iii CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Conceptual Site Model (CSM) revision was prepared by BE Aerospace, Inc. (BE) and CRB
Geological & Environmental Services, Inc. (CRB) in partial satisfaction of the requirements of the
September 2012 Administrative Order On Consent (AOC) to prepare a Conceptual Site Model (CSM)
for the BE facility located at 1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (the Site). The first
site assessment was completed in 1997 in response to the December 20, 1996 Notice of Violation
(NOV) for groundwater quality standard exceedences issued by the North Carolina Department of
Environmental and Natural Resources (NCDENR). Additional assessment of the site since 1997 has
included quarterly groundwater monitoring through 2012.
A Conceptual Site Model was originally presented as the report titled Comprehensive Site Assessment
Addendum, July 2000. Updates to the CSM have been submitted semi-annually and quarterly as
Groundwater Monitoring Reports from 2001 through 2012. This report updates the CSM with the most
recent groundwater monitoring results and remedial system evaluation.
The CSM is organized into eight (8) sections. Section 1.0 is the introduction and includes the purpose
and format of the report. A site description and physical setting concept is presented in Section 2.0.
Section 3.0 presents a summary of surrounding land use and migration pathways. The results of soil
gas, soil and groundwater assessments are presented in Sections 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0, respectively. A
summary of remedial action performed at the Site is presented in Section 7.0. References are given in
Section 8.0. Figures and tables are in Appendix I and Appendix II.
BEA 414-02 1 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The BE Aerospace facility is located at 1455 Fairchild Road and occupies approximately thirty (30)
acres in Section 29, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, Forsyth County, in Winston-Salem, North
Carolina. A site location map is included as Figure 1. A site map is included as Figure 2. The Site
consists of five (5) manufacturing buildings, an administrative building, a test facility, paved parking
areas and undeveloped, wooded land. Fairchild Industries developed the facility in 1969 which has
operated continuously as an aircraft seating manufacturer. BE Aerospace purchased the Site in 1996.
The area surrounding the facility is characterized by industrial and manufacturing facilities, including
the Smith Reynolds Airport.
2.1 TOPOGRAPHY
Figure 1 is based on the 7.5-minute "Walkertown, NC" United States Geological Survey (USGS)
topographic map of the site and surrounding area. The elevation of the Site is approximately 900 feet
above sea level. As indicated on the site topographic map in Figure 3, the Site slopes to the west and to
the south. Approximately thirty-four (34) feet of manmade structural relief were observed along the
western margin of the Site as part of an old airport runway mound. Approximately eighteen (18) feet of
structural relief were observed along the southeastern margin of the Site. A branch of the Bowen
Branch Creek is located within 500 feet of the southwestern portion of the Site. The branch of the
Bowen Branch Creek flows generally from the northwest to the southeast, beginning near industrial
facilities located along North Liberty Street and continuing along Fairchild Road and downstream to the
southeast. Bowen Branch Creek flows south along the eastern boundary of the Smith -Reynolds Airport,
approximately 1,000 feet east of the Site. The Bowen Branch Creek flows into Salem Creek
downstream of Salem Lake.
2.2 GEOLOGY
Regional geology was determined from maps and publications produced by the North Carolina Geologic
Survey (NCGS) and the USGS. Site -specific geology is based on monitoring well and soil boring logs
collected during previous site assessments.
2.2.1 Regional Geology
The Site is located in the Central Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina. In the Site area,
this region includes intrusive and metamorphic rocks of the Carolina Slate Belt, Charlotte Belt and
Milton Belt. These include primarily schist, gneiss, and granite. A Geologic Cross Section Locator
Map (Figure 4) and a Geologic Cross Section C-C' (Figure 5), are referenced from the USGS 1975
"Geologic Map of the East Half of the Winston-Salem Quadrangle". Section C-C' features a northwest
to southeast running profile, located to the southwest of the Site. In the area of the Site, granitic gneiss
and schist of the Charlotte Belt are present to a depth of approximately 10,000 feet below sea level.
2.2.2 Site -Specific Geology
Geology at the Site is comprised of surficial fill material and saprolite and partially weathered bedrock
in a thin transition zone, and competent granitic bedrock. Fill material covers most of the Site to a depth
of up to thirty (30) feet and was characterized as silts, sandy silts, and clayey silts. The fill material was
imported from nearby sources during construction of the original runway of the Smith -Reynolds Airport.
Weathered bedrock was encountered from depths of approximately twenty-five (25) to one hundred and
ten (110) feet below land surface (bls). Competent bedrock was encountered at depths from thirty-four
BEA 414-02 2 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

(34) feet bls in the northern portion of the Site to one hundred and thirty (130) feet bls in the
southwestern portion of the Site. The bedrock was consistent with the metamorphic suite of the
Charlotte Belt gneiss and schist. Fractured bedrock was encountered in the upper ten (10) feet of
competent bedrock in several bedrock monitoring wells.
As depicted in Figure 3, the natural surface topography slopes to the south towards a tributary to Bowen
Branch Creek. An undulating bedrock surface in the vicinity of the Site was evident from surface
observations and drilling observations. Figure 6 depicts the neighboring properties near the Site and the
areas of surface drainage slopes to the west and east of the Site. The undulating bedrock surface is
aligned in north -south ridges that outcrops in the wooded property west Site, dips steeply to depths over
100 feet along the western boundary of the Site; rises near the surface along the center of the Site and
dips again east of the Site. The southward plunging ridge of bedrock approximately bisects the Site
under Building 1.
2.2.3 Cross Section
A geologic cross section locator map is presented in Figure 7. Figure 8, Figure 9, and Figure 10 present
site -specific south to north cross -sections A -A', B-B', and C-C' respectively. Figure 11 is a west to east
generalized cross-section of the Site through D-D'.
Table 1 summarizes the monitoring well construction details and depth to bedrock encountered during
well installation activities at the Site. In several locations, weathered rock and bedrock were not
encountered during the installation of monitoring wells or advancement of soil borings. Figure 12
presents the relative elevation of bedrock at the Site. Less competent bedrock was encountered in deep
monitoring wells MW-lOD and MW-12D. In monitoring well MW-IOD the less competent bedrock
zone was encountered between 57.5-63 feet bls. In monitoring well MW-12D and MW-26D less
competent bedrock zone was encountered between 55-58 feet bls.
2.2.4 Faults and Structure
A review of regional geology maps was previously performed as part of the site assessment. The nearest
major fault was the Stoney Ridge Fault, a northeast southwest trending fault which is located
approximately ten (10) miles northwest of the Site. Strike and dip measurements were measured in
several prominent creekbed outcrops. Strike was measured between twenty-five (25) and forth -four (44)
degrees and dip was between twenty-six (26) and thirty-one (31) degrees and was consistent with
regional structure. There are no known faults or regional structures in the vicinity of the Site, and no
apparent lineaments in aerial photographs which suggest a nearby fault zone.
2.3 HYDROGEOLOGY
Regional hydrogeology was determined by a review of information provided by the NCDENR and the
USGS hydrologic maps. Site -specific hydrogeology was determined through site -specific groundwater
elevation and aquifer test data collected during the CSA investigations.
2.3.1 Regional Hydrogeology
Regional hydrogeology is part of the Piedmont and Mountains Groundwater System, comprised of the
Piedmont Plateau and the Appalachian Mountains. The regolith, or unconsolidated rock layer stores
groundwater in a water table aquifer that discharges to regional streams. The Piedmont and Mountain
BEA 414-02 3 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

Groundwater System is characterized by a shallow water table and low hydraulic conductivity. The
direction of groundwater flow is variable depending primarily on the topography of the specific area.
Regional groundwater flow in the vicinity of the Site trends to the southeast.
The shallow groundwater table was identified in saprolitic layers above metamorphic bedrock. Saprolite
is derived from physical and chemical weathering of the underlying parent bedrock. The predominant
parent rock types are granitic gneiss and mica schist. These rock types were formed by regional
metamorphism of igneous rocks during the Paleozoic Era. Erosion and weathering have produced the
current Piedmont topography and soils.
Weathering decreases with depth and the residuum exhibits degraded structural characteristics of the
parent rock material and is referred to as saprolite. Saprolite has a variable thickness across the Site.
Saprolite is generally friable and grades at depth into bedrock across an area referred to as the transition
zone. In general, surficial saprolitic soils are clay -rich due to greater weathering and become coarser
grained with depth.
2.3.2 Site -Specific Hydrogeology
The groundwater at the Site is found in an upper water bearing zone in the saprolite, and a deep water
bearing zone in the fractured bedrock. Groundwater flow directions are estimated by plotting
groundwater elevation contours from water level measurements in surveyed monitoring well network.
Water level measurements are collected semi-annually and quarterly as part of regular groundwater
monitoring.
2.3.2.1 Water Table and Groundwater Flow
The shallow water table observed at the Site was continuous from the groundwater interface to the
surface of the bedrock. Depth to groundwater ranged from approximately thirty (30) feet in the northern
part of the Site, to sixty (60) feet near Building 3. The thickness of the saprolitic water table ranged
from nonexistent to over sixty (60) feet near monitoring well MW-14D in the southwestern part of the
Site. Bedrock extended above the shallow water table beneath Building 1, and also off -site to the west.
The deepest portion of the water table occurred in a distinct depression in the bedrock surface near
monitoring well MW-22D. The thickness of the shallow water table increased towards the southwestern
portion of the Site as the depth to bedrock increased. Predominant groundwater flow at the Site was to
the south-southwest across a steep gradient of 0.03 feet per foot. The water table surface drops fifty (50)
feet across the north -south length of the Site.
Bedrock groundwater was observed in the fractured zone of the upper twenty (20) feet of the bedrock
surface. Groundwater conductivity was generally low in deep bedrock layer (MW-22D, 27D, and
27DD). The direction of groundwater flow in the bedrock was generally to the southwest. A consistent
upward hydraulic gradient was measured from bedrock wells into the overlying saprolite, which
indicates that bedrock groundwater reservoirs recharge the shallow water bearing zone.
Shallow groundwater discharges to the Bowen Branch Creek tributary south of Fairchild Road. The
creekbed was observed to be bedrock and gaining stream conditions were prevalent, which confirms the
creek as the groundwater discharge location.
BEA 414-02 4 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

2.3.2.2 Aquifer Properties
Aquifer properties were evaluated using slug tests, pump tests and monitoring well development
observations. Average hydraulic conductivity at the Site ranged from three and one-half (3.5) to seven
(7) feet per day (ft/day) in the upper saprolite, and one and seven -tenths (1.7) to four (4) ft/day in the
lower saprolite. Average conductivity for the bedrock layer is estimated to be approximately three -
tenths (0.3) ft/day for the entire layer. CRB measured total porosity at 42-45% in two (2) shallow soil
borings during the initial site assessments. The calculated groundwater velocity at the Site varied over
parts of the Site and was estimated in a range between fifty (50) to 150 feet per year.
BEA 414-02 5 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

3.0 SITE ASSESSMENT
Contamination from past unknown releases of solvent were first identified at the Site during property
transaction due diligence in 1996. This section summarizes the contamination assessment for soil, soil
gas, groundwater, and surface water to date. During the course of the assessment, contamination was
identified in the following areas of the Site:
• Hazardous Waste Storage Area (HWSA), which is located in the southwestern part of the Site near
Building 3 as the former location of a drum storage area used until 2004.
• The Courtyard Area (CYA), which is located in the northern part of the Site near Building s 1 and 2
where three (3) solvent vapor degreasers formerly operated.
• The Fairchild Storage Shed Area, which is located in the northeastern area of the Site where a
storage building was located through the 1980's.
• Northwest Area (NWA), which is located in the northwest corner of the Site near building 2 and
Building 3. This area includes the former Air Compressor Area, Stormwater Outfall Area and
Methylene Chloride Area.
3.1 SOIL ASSESSMENT
This section summarizes soil contamination identified in the HWSA and other Solid Waste Management
Units (SWMUs) identified in the AOC. As part of the previous investigations, soil samples were
collected from the Site. The results of laboratory analyses indicated detectable concentrations of volatile
and semi -volatile organic compounds, heavy metals, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in the surficial
soils at the Site.
3.1.1 Former HWSA
The former HWSA was identified as a Hazardous Waste Management Unit (HWMU) in the AOC and is
located in the southwestern portion of the Site near Building 3. Based on facility interviews and
historical documentation, drums of virgin materials and waste were stored in the HWSA beginning
around 1973 with the construction of Building 3. Since the 1980's, hazardous waste was stored in
drums under a covered steel post and wood structure built on asphalt in a fenced and secured area. Soil
contamination identified near the HWMU was the result of unknown spills. It was not known if soil
contamination was the result of spills of waste or virgin product. Hazardous waste is no longer stored at
the HWMU and RCRA Closure was performed in May 2004.
Based on soil analytical data reported in the CSAA, concentrations of TPH and PCE was identified in
the vicinity of the HWSA. The horizontal and vertical extents of the soil contamination were identified
in the upper two (2) to four (4) feet of soil in two (2) areas near the HWSA. Concentrations of volatile
organic halogenated compounds (VOHs) reported in the HWSA were identified as possible source
material for groundwater contamination.
Soil contamination was excavated from the HWSA in 2005 and a soil vapor extraction (SVE) system
was installed in this area to achieve vapor phase removal of residual solvent concentrations in soil near
underground utilities and at inaccessible depths.
BEA 414-02 6 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

3.1.2 Solid Waste Management Units
Areas at the Site identified as SWMUs, and referenced in the AOC, included the former Fairchild
Storage Shed (FSS), the Stormwater Outfall area (SWO), the Air Compressor Area (ACA), and the
Courtyard Area (CYA). These areas were not designated for the management of solid or hazardous
waste, but were identified as SWMUs due to the presence of soil or groundwater contamination. Soil
contamination was not expected or documented in any of the other SWMUs listed in the 2012 AOC.
The area of the SWO was undeveloped and no storage structures were present in this area. The source
of the soil contamination was runoff from the paved areas of the Site. The soil concentrations were
delineated in an area approximately five (5) square feet at the base of a concrete drainage flume. Based
on analytical data presented in previous assessments, soils in the vicinity of the SWO contained
concentrations of TPH, O&G, lead, chromium, and mercury slightly above soil standards. As of May
2004, the original area of soil sampling at the base of the SWO was severely eroded to a depth three (3)
feet beneath a thick mat of kudzu and no longer exists.
The Air Compressor Area north of Building 2 included a concrete pad, trench drain, and catch basin.
Concentrations of TPH were identified in soil samples along the edge of the concrete pad as a result of
air compressor blow -down oil and greasy residue. Soils in this area were removed during foundation
excavation of a new air compressor enclosure in 2004.
3.1.2.1 Courtyard Area
The location of the CYA is shown in Figure 2. Only groundwater contamination from VOCs was
identified in the CYA in the CSA and CSAA. No hazardous waste storage structures were identified in
the CYA. The area consists of grassy and paved surfaces adjacent to manufacturing buildings.
Historical documentation indicates that hazardous wastes were not stored in the CYA. The source of
groundwater contamination beneath the CYA was from unknown solvent losses attributed to the historic
use of chlorinated solvents in vapor degreasers near the CYA. Soil contamination was not identified in
soil samples collected in the CYA, including sub -slab samples collected from the former vapor
degreaser location. Accordingly, source material probably migrated to the water table through small
discrete vertical pathways in the saprolitic soil beneath from the degreaser area, and no soil excavation
was feasible. Soil vapor extraction operated in the CYA from 2005 until 2012 in order to achieve vapor
phase removal of any residual solvents concentrations in the soil.
3.1.2.2 Former Fairchild Storage Shed Area
The FSS was located east of Building 1. A concrete pad remains in the area from the former storage
shed. The area surrounding the concrete pad is covered with grass or asphalt. There are no other
structures in this area. Hazardous or solid wastes are not stored in the vicinity of the FSS. No
documents were found pertaining to potential past storage of virgin products or hazardous waste
historically in the FSS. As reported in the CSAA, low concentrations of PCE, chromium and arsenic and
TPH were reported in shallow soil samples collected from this area. The source of the contamination in
this area was from undocumented spills or leaks during prior ownership of the Site.
Soils in the area of the FSS were excavated during 2004, and a soil vapor extraction system operated in
the area from 2004 until 2006 to achieve vapor phase removal of residual solvent concentrations which
were not accessible due to underground utilities.
BEA 414-02 7 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

3.2 SOIL GAS ASSESSMENT
Soil gas was assessed across the Site using passive soil gas sampling devices and through direct
measurements of soil vapor using field instruments and laboratory analysis of vapor samples. The
sampling locations were selected to investigate 1) the potential lateral extent of chlorinated solvent
contamination in the soils; 2) potential lateral extent of chlorinated solvent contamination in the
groundwater; 3) the impact the extensive underground drainage system had on contaminant migration, if
any; 4) potential source areas from on -site or off -site concerns; and 5) to target additional subsurface
exploration
As reported in the 2000 CSAA, fifty-four (54) Gore-Sorbero in -situ soil gas modules were installed at
the Site in 1997 as part of the site assessment. The soil -gas modules were retrieved for analysis of PCE,
TCE, 1,1,1-TCA, cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE), trans-1,2-dichloroethene (t-1,2-DCE), and
methylene chloride. Soil gas sampling locations are shown in Figure 15. A diagram of PCE
concentrations in soil gas measured in 1997 is shown in Figure 16.
Relatively low concentrations of PCE, TCE, 1,1,1-TCA were reported in soil gas samples. No
significant concentrations of chlorinated compounds were detected in the western undeveloped portion
of the property, with the exception of 158.84µg of PCE detected in SG-39. The results of the soil gas
survey indicated that the contamination indicated in the vicinity of the Stormwater Outfall was limited.
The results of the soil gas survey identified three (3) on -site source areas exist for the observed
chlorinated compound groundwater and soil contamination at the site discussed below.
3.2.1 HWSA Soil Gas
Relatively low concentrations of PCE, 1,2-DCE and TCE were detected in the soil gas in the vicinity of
the HWSA. The source of the contamination in this area is likely due to historic spills and leaks
associated with past storage of PCE at the Site. The soil gas results were consistent with groundwater
concentration measurements and the location of the groundwater plume. No soil gas concentrations
were measured near the Administrative Building or along Fairchild Road, and concentrations measured
near Buildings 3 and 3A were several orders of magnitude lower than concentrations measured in source
areas.
Organic vapor measurements from the SVE system in the HWSA were measured using a
photoionization detector (PID) and decreased from 172 ppmV in August 2005 to 6 ppmV in September
2006. As of April 2012, organic vapor measurements from the SVE exhaust were below the detection
limit of 0.1 ppmV and the HWSA SVE unit was turned off.
3.2.2 CYA Soil Gas
The Courtyard Area plume is concentrated at the junction of Building 1 and Building IA.
Concentrations of solvents were centered near the location of MW-30, where a vapor degreaser sump
was formerly located. The source of the contamination in this area is likely the historic chemical use of
PCE and solvents during manufacturing processes in this area. Lower soil gas concentrations were
measured in sub -slab samples in Building 1 and Building 2. A soil vapor extraction system was
installed in this area in 2005 to achieve vapor phase removal of solvent concentrations and to prevent
vapor intrusion into the nearby buildings.
BEA 414-02 8 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

Organic vapor measurements from the SVE system in the CYA were measured using a PID and
decreased from over 330 ppmV in August 2005 to 21 ppmV in April 2007. As of January 2011, organic
vapor measurements from the SVE exhaust were below the detection limit of 0.1 ppmV and have
remained below detectable limits through 2012. Although soil vapor exhaust concentrations are below
detectable levels, the CYA SVE continues to operate as a precaution to prevent vapor intrusion into the
nearby buildings.
To evaluate boundary conditions, soil gas samples were recollected from six (6) locations on the Site
north of Building 1 A during July 2011. The 2011 soil gas analysis showed a decrease in PCE from
approximately 300µg to 40µg along the northern boundary of Building IA, which was consistent with
groundwater reductions observed between 1997 and 2011.
3.2.3 FFS Soil Gas
Concentrations of PCE and solvents were detected in the soil gas adjacent to the Former Fairchild
Storage Shed. The source of the contamination in this area was unknown releases from past storage of
chemicals in the shed prior to its removal in 1989. The soil gas concentrations in the FSS were defined
in the immediate area of the former shed slab.
Organic vapor measurements from the SVE system in the FSS were measured using a photoionization
detector (PID) and decreased from 150 ppmV in November 2004 to 2 ppmV in January 2006. The FSS
SVE system was turned off and removed from the Site in May 2006.
3.3 GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
The source of the groundwater contamination was identified as unknown releases resulting from historic
operations at the Site in the HWSA, CYA, FSS and in the Northwest Area. Groundwater was assessed
through a total of thirty-three (33) monitoring wells installed between 1996 and 2003. Semi -Annual and
Quarterly groundwater monitoring has been performed since 2000. Groundwater concentrations have
been reduced across the Site since the implementation of in -situ groundwater bioremediation and soil
vapor extraction.
This section summarizes field measurements and groundwater/surface water data collected during the
annual monitoring event, conducted in April 2012, and the most recent quarterly monitoring event,
conducted in November 2012. All monitoring wells were sampled during the annual sampling event,
and select wells were sampled during the quarterly monitoring event. Groundwater/analytical results
from the most recent sampling event are discussed relative to historical concentrations observed at the
Site.
3.3.1 Groundwater Elevation Monitoring
Depth -to -water measurements were collected from on -site monitoring wells on April 2, 2012 and
November 8, 2012, pursuant to the methodology specified in an approved Groundwater Sampling and
Analysis Plan. Depth -to -water measurements were used to determine the elevation of the groundwater
at the site relative to a public NAD 27 benchmark located on the Smith -Reynolds Airport property. The
groundwater elevation data and top of casing elevation measurements are summarized in Table 1. The
locations of the monitoring wells are shown in Figure 2.
BEA 414-02 9 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

Groundwater flowed from upgradient recharge to the south and towards the Bowen Branch Creek,
located south of Fairchild Road. Shallow groundwater flow diverged slightly east and west of a bedrock
ridge located beneath Building 1. Based on historic observations, vertical groundwater flow is upward
from the underlying bedrock into the saprolite.
3.3.2 Groundwater Monitoring
The schedule and procedures for groundwater monitoring of the Site were proposed in a Groundwater
Sampling and Analysis Plan (GWSAP) submitted to the NCDWM in June 2000. The GWSAP was
approved with comments in an approval letter dated November 9, 2000. Revisions to the GWSAP were
submitted to the NCDWM in April 2006 to include groundwater monitoring as part of underground
injection activities. The most recent annual groundwater monitoring report was submitted in May 2012,
and the most recent quarterly monitoring event was conducted in November 2012. The results of
quarterly groundwater monitoring are summarized in Section 3.3.
CRB personnel collected groundwater samples from select on -site monitoring wells. Monitoring wells
were purged using pre -packaged polyethylene bailers or a submersible pump. The wells were purged
until pH, temperature, ORP, dissolved oxygen, and conductivity stabilized, or until the wells were
purged to near dryness. Final groundwater parameter readings from sampling are summarized in Table
3.
Groundwater samples were collected using pre -packaged polyethylene bailers or through disposable
polyethylene pump tubing. Groundwater sampling was performed in accordance with CRB's
Comprehensive Quality Assurance Plan (ComQAP) and pursuant to methodologies specified in the
GWSAP. Groundwater samples and a trip blank were preserved on ice and submitted via overnight
courier to certified laboratories for analysis by EPA Method 8260. Samples from the April 2, 2012
annual sampling event were sent to Environmental Science Corporation (ESC) located in Mt. Juliet,
Tennessee, and samples from the November 2012 quarterly sampling event were sent to Pace Analytical
Services, Inc., located in Huntersville, North Carolina. Laboratory analytical reports and chain of
custody records are included in Appendix IV.
3.3.3 Groundwater Analytical Results
Based on laboratory analytical results, groundwater concentrations decreased across the majority of the Site,
with some exceptions. The primary compound above North Carolina 2L Groundwater Standards (NC 2L)
at the Site is PCE which have continued to decrease with the historic trend. Concentrations of
trichloroethylene (TCE) and 1,1-dichloroethene (1,1-DCE), and cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE) were
also reported above NC 2L in a limited number of wells. Historic groundwater analytical results are
summarized in Table 2. The distribution of PCE concentrations in groundwater is shown in Figure 17.
3.3.4 Courtyard Area Groundwater Results
The CYA refers to the area located between Buildings 1 and 2 in the northern part of the Site. Two (2)
vapor degreasers were formerly located in the CYA. The CYA was identified as the source area for
groundwater contamination at the Site and has exhibited the largest concentration reductions as source
material has been eliminated through soil vapor extraction and bioremediation. Concentrations in the
CYA continued to decrease and concentrations of PCE slightly above the NC 2L standard of 0.7 µg/L
were detected in groundwater samples collected from CYA. Continued influence from in -situ
BEA 414-02 10 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

bioremediation and operation of the SVE system is expected to further reduce concentrations in the
CYA.
The concentration of PCE reported in MW-6 was BDL in November 2012, which has remained near or
below detection limits since May 2011. The PCE concentration in bedrock well MW-12D decreased
from 1 µg/l., in July to BDL in November 2012.
The concentration of PCE reported in MW-26D was BDL in April 2012. Also in April 2012, PCE
remained stable at 13 µg/L in MW-29, located in the eastern part of the CYA and low concentrations of
cis-1,2-DCE indicate continued biodegradation of PCE in the area of MW-29. PCE decreased from 48
µg/L to a concentration of 22 µg/L in MW-30 between January 2012 and April 2012.
Monitoring wells located upgradient from the CYA included MW-5, which was BDL for all compounds
in April 2012, and MW-11, which decreased from 1.9 µg/L to 1.2 µg/L between January 2012 and April
2012.
PCE concentrations continue to decrease downgradient from the CYA. Between July and November
2012, PCE increased slightly from 5.1 µg/L to 5.7 µg/L in MW-33. The concentration of PCE in
downgradient wells was BDL in bedrock monitoring wells MW-27D and MW-27DD in April 2012.
MW-13 was dry and was not sampled during the annual or quarterly sampling event, but the well has
historically reported low or BDL concentrations.
3.3.5 Former Fairchild Storage Shed Area
The FSS is located in the northeast comer of the Site. Concentrations of PCE in groundwater samples
collected in the FSS remained low in monitoring well MW-1 but slightly above groundwater standard at
a concentration of 5.9 µg/L in November 2012. PCE remained BDL in MW-IOD in the annual sampling
event.
The concentration of PCE reported in downgradient well MW-28 decreased from 5.8 µg/L to 4.5 µg/L
from 2011 to April 2012. The concentration of PCE in upgradient well MW-9 remained BDL in the
annual sampling event. The concentration of PCE reported in monitoring well MW-7, located
downgradient from the FSS, remained stable at a concentration of 3.6 µg/L in April 2012. Monitoring
well MW-8 remained dry and was not sampled during the annual or quarterly monitoring period.
3.3.6 Northwest Area
The Northwest Area (NWA) refers to the northwestern portion of the Site, and includes the former Air
Compressor Area and the Storm Water Outfall. The primary contaminant reported in the NWA is PCE
with concentrations of TCE, and 1,1-DCE historically reported above NC 2L standards. In shallow
NWA well MW-4, PCE decreased slightly from 18 µg/L to 16 µg/L from 2011 to April 2012. The
concentration of PCE increased to 64 µg/L in MW-20 in April 2012. In MW-18, the concentration of
PCE increased from 64 µg/L to 131 µg/L from July to November 2012, and TCE decreased to 9.4 µg/L.
In the intermediate depth well MW-19 PCE decreased from 56 µg/L to 29.9 µg/L, and 1,1-DCE
increased from 42 µg/L to 29.4 µg/L between July and November 2012.
BEA 414-02 11 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

3.3.7 Hazardous Waste Storage Area
The HWSA is the southwestern part of the Site, and was formerly an open storage shed area. The area
of highest concentrations at the Site has been reduced to the HWSA with concentrations now generally
below 1,000 µg/L. As shown in Figure 17, the axis of elevated groundwater concentrations observed in
the HWSA extended southward near the western edge of Building 3 towards MW-14D and
downgradient monitoring well MW-15R. Historic sampling of off -site monitoring wells located on the
Forsyth County Airport property west of the Site delineated the plume along the western property
boundary of the Site.
Concentrations of PCE, TCE, 1,1-DCE, and cis-1,2-DCE exceeded NC 2L groundwater standards in
HWS monitoring wells and continued a decreasing trend through April 2012 and remained stable
through November 2012.
In November 2012, the concentration of PCE in MW-14D remained stable at 1,000 µg/L, TCE increased
to 20 µg/L, 1,1-DCE decreased to 8.9 µg/L, and cis-DCE decreased to 45.6 µg/L.
In MW-3, PCE increased from 370 µg/L in 2011 to 640 µg/L in April 2012. PCE increased in MW-24
from 460 µg/L to 490 µg/L between 2011 and April 2012. In bedrock well MW-22D, PCE, TCE and
cis-1,2-DCE concentrations increased to 190 µg/L, 17 µg/L, and 130 µg/L, respectively, in the annual
sampling event.
Concentrations of PCE were delineated to the east by MW-32 at 9.9 µg/L in April 2012, compared to 17
µg/L in May 2011. Concentrations were defined to the west by the absence of shallow groundwater as a
result of high bedrock elevations approximately fifty (50) feet west of the Site boundary. The
concentrations of VOCs historically reported in downgradient aeration wells AW-1 through AW-5,
recovery well RW-3, and monitoring well MW-15R further delineated the main axis of the plume as
shown in Figure 17.
In November 2012, downgradient well MW-15R exhibited a PCE decrease to 817 µg/L; TCE increased
to 24.4 µg/L, 1,1-DCE decreased to 25.2 µg/L, and cis-DCE increased to 78.6 µg/L. The downgradient
concentration of PCE measured in the downgradient well RW-3 decreased from 34 µg/L in August 2011
to 28 µg/L in April 2012.
Upgradient monitoring wells from the HWSA include MW-16, MW-21D, and MW-23. In April 2012,
the concentration of PCE decreased from 420 µg/L to 290 µg/L in MW-16 and from 18 µg/L to 7.7 µg/L
in MW-23. Groundwater concentrations reported in April 2012 in MW-23 included the degradation
product cis-1,2-DCE at 200 µg/L. PCE decreased in deep monitoring well MW-21D from 1,100 µg/L in
July 2012 to 1,060 µg/L in November 2012.
3.4 SURFACE WATER ASSESSMENT
Surface water samples were collected from sampling four (4) locations in the Bowen Branch Creek on
November 8, 2012. Surface water samples were submitted to ESC for analysis of VOH by EPA Method
8260. A summary of historic surface water analytical results is presented as Table 4. As shown in
Figure 5, surface water sample location BESS-4 is upstream of the expected groundwater discharge area
from the Site. Sample locations BESS-5 and BESS-6 are locations where groundwater visibly seeps
from underlying bedrock into the creekbank. Sample location BESS-7 is downstream located beyond
BEA 414-02 12 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

the zone of groundwater discharge downgradient from the site and represent concentrations in the stream
flow. The Bowen Branch Creek is classified as Class C Surface Water, and was posted for no -contact
by NCDENR during 2006 after pesticides and inorganic compounds were reportedly measured in the
creek from off -site sources upstream from the BE Aerospace Site.
Surface water analytical results were BDL for BESS-4, BESS-5, and BESS-7. Sample location BESS-6
had a PCE concentration of 198 µg/L and 1,1-DCE concentration of 29.1 µg/L, which exceed the NC 2B
Surface Water Standards for protection of aquatic life/Class C Surface Water.
BEA 414-02 13 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

4.0 LAND USE ASSESSMENT
Information on present and historical land use at the site and surrounding properties was conducted
through reviews of regulatory records, aerial photographs, and interviews with knowledgeable persons.
4.1 SITE REGULATORY RECORDS
The Site was formerly identified as Burns Aerospace Corp. and located at 1455 Fairchild Road, was
identified on the TRIS, ERNS, and RCRIS-LQG databases. According to the databases, Burns
Aerospace Corp. previously generated, used, or disposed of USEPA hazardous waste categories, 1`001,
F002, F003, F006, and F019. EPA waste codes F001 and F002 refer in part to spent halogenated
solvents used in degreasing including: PCE, methylene chloride, 1,1,1-TCA, carbon tetrachloride, and
chlorobenzenes. Chlorinated solvent waste was not generated since 1996, and hazardous waste
quantities have decreased substantially since 2000. The Site remains a Large Quantity Generator of
Hazardous Waste, and is registered as a Part A Permitted Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility
(TSDF) as a result of soil contamination contained in the Closed RCRA Hazardous Waste Management
Unit.
4.2 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW
An historical aerial review was conducted to identify 1) past use of the Site, 2) historical and current use of
surrounding properties, 3) historical large-scale environmental concerns (such as landfills), and 4) potential
migration pathways and receptors. A review of publicly available aerial photographs
4.2.1 The Site
The 1951 aerial photograph showed that the Site was first developed as a landing strip of the Smith
Reynolds Airport. Building 1 and Fairchild Road were constructed sometime between 1958 and 1966.
Building 2 was constructed between 1966 and 1968. Buildings 1 and 2 were constructed along the
runway. Aircraft were observed parked next to the buildings in several photographs. A structure
resembling a drainage ditch was present only from 1966 until 1968 and was located from the western
slope of the Site to the intersection of Fairchild Road and North Liberty Street. Thin vegetation in the
area of this former ditch continued until the 1994 photograph. Buildings 1A, 3 and 3A were constructed
between 1972 and 1975. Clearing and construction continued in the southwestern portion of the
property through 1975.
An addition, between Building IA and Building 2 occurred between 1975 and 1978. This addition now
houses the chemical baths and a drum storage area for oil and petroleum products. The southern portion
of the Site was more heavily wooded from 1978 until 1980 when construction of the administrative
building began. Clearing, grading and backfilling on the southeastern portion of the Site was observed
in the 1980 photograph. Drum storage and miscellaneous material was visible in the northwestern,
northeastern, and southwestern corners of the Site from 1978 until 1994. Storage sheds or coverings
were built between 1984 and 1987 in the northeastern and southwestern corners of the Site. Additional
storage sheds and trailers were visible in different locations around the site in the photographs from
1980 until 1994.
BEA 414-02 14 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

Construction of the test facility on the eastern boundary of the Site took place between 1984 and 1987.
A storage trailer was present in the area prior to the test facility. Modifications to the building continued
until 1994 when the test facility reached its current layout.
Construction of the metal cuttings overhang was visible in the 1994 photograph. An aboveground
storage tank (AST), which was identified during Site activities as an empty propane tank, was visible in
the 1994 photograph in its current location at the northeastern corner of the Site.
4.2.1.1 Eastern Properties
Adjacent to the east of the Site was a shallow grassy valley separating the Site and Runway 33 of the
Smith Reynolds Airport. Aviation Drive was built in the valley from Fairchild Road onto the airport
property between 1975 and 1978. Backfilling and clearing activities in the valley were evident from
time to time. No buried utilities or structures were evident in the aerial photographs.
Aerial photographs showed that a landfill was present cross -gradient and approximately 2,000 feet east
of the Site. The landfill appeared to be divided into two (2) cells located beyond the eastern slope of
Runway 33. The landfill was present with various amounts of fill in aerial photographs from 1951 until
1994. The landfill appeared to be filled in the 1984 photograph, however, truck paths and some clearing
were evident. The former location of the landfill was wooded and a building was present in the most
recent aerial photograph. Further investigation indicated that the landfill was used for disposal of
municipal garbage from at least the 1960s until its closure in the early 1980s. Additional information
concerning the landfill is summarized in Section Error! Reference source not found..
4.2.1.2 Southern Properties
Aerial photographs showed that the area to the south of the Site was undeveloped until 1966 when the
building located at 1100 Fairchild Road, now occupied by Sun Chemical, was built. Buildings located
at 1110 and 1130 Fairchild Road were constructed between 1968 and 1972. In the 1986 through 1994
aerial photographs, drums, crates and materials were observed in the yard south of the building located
at 1100 Fairchild Road. The southern slope of the property was backfilled in the 1972 photograph and a
truck loading area was present north of the building.
A mill or storage yard was present at the property to the southwest of the Site since the 1972
photograph. Material piles were evident in the unpaved yard area. Trucks, trailers and vehicles
observed in the photographs suggest that the property may have been a loading yard or a construction
supply yard.
A branch of the Bowen Branch Creek was evident at the south boundary of the properties located along
the south side of Fairchild Road. The creek was observed in a wooded section along a northwest to
southeast course.
The large administrative building used by the Forsyth County Agriculture Department located at 1450
Fairchild Road was built between 1972 and 1975. Storage trailers or sheds were evident in the later
photographs. The Forsyth County Animal Shelter was built between 1968 and 1972 and remained
unchanged through 1994. The Forsyth County Garage was built between 1978 and 1980 on previously
cleared property. The garage property included a slab, which potentially covered a fuel tank farm.
BEA 414-02 15 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

Residential buildings were present beyond 500 feet of the Site since the 1958 photograph and have
remained essentially unchanged through the 1994 photograph, with the exception of the construction of
additional apartments in 1972.
4.2.1.3 Northern Properties
The Smith Reynolds Airport property occupied the area north of the Site in the 1951 through 1994
photographs. Aircraft parking on the old runway just north of the Site was evident in photographs from
the 1960s and 1970s. A fire department building was constructed between 1978 and 1980 on the
runway adjacent to the Site. Modifications to the fire department building continued through the 1994
photograph.
4.2.1.4 Western Properties
Construction of a facility adjacent to the wooded section on the western portion of the Site began in
1972. A large AST was constructed between 1975 and 1978 and was evident until the 1987 photograph.
Two (2) smaller ASTs were built between 1987 and 1990 and were present in the 1994 photograph. The
property did not appear paved in the most recent photographs. A large circular area in the former
location of the larger AST was evident in the 1994 photograph.
Beyond 500 feet of the Site, Runway 3 of the Smith Reynolds Airport was present in the 1951
photograph. Beyond Runway 3 were several stores or shops, including apparent auto repair facilities.
Several residential structures were also evident in the photographs. The beginning of the Brushy Creek
branch was present on the west slope of Runway 3 and flowed south of the Site. The shops and
development of the western area preceded the development of the Site as evidenced in the earlier
photographs.
Beyond 1,000 feet of the Site, on the west side of North Liberty Street was a very large railroad car
switching yard. Beyond the railroad was an apparent metal scrap yard, which occupied many acres.
Photographs of these areas showed heavy industrial use through 1994.
4.3 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
The section discusses the data developed on properties surrounding the Site. Available files were
updated during a file review conducted as part of CSAA activities on May 9, 2000.
4.3.1 Forsyth County Garage -1202 Fairchild Road
Forsyth County Garage, located southeast of the Site at 1202 Fairchild Road, was identified on the UST
and LUST databases. Appearance on the UST database indicates that the facility has or has had an
underground storage tank. Appearance on the LUST database indicates that the facility had a release of
petroleum products from one (1) or more of its USTs. According to the UST database, the Forsyth
County Garage has two (2) active 12,000-gallon gasoline USTs. Five (5) USTs were removed from the
site in 1992, 1993, and 1994. The LUST database indicates that on April 14, 1994, soil and groundwater
contamination were reported from data gathered during the tank closure activities. A NCDENR file
review was conducted for the Forsyth County Garage (Incident #12288) during CSA activities.
Updated documents for this file were reviewed during CSAA activities. Based on the review of a July
1999 Revised Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for the facility, petroleum contamination was observed
BEA 414-02 16 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

during UST removal activities in June 1994. Approximately 450 tons of soil was removed from the
Forsyth County Garage. Elevated concentrations of petroleum products such as benzene, toluene, ethyl
benzene, and xylene (BTEX), and VOHs were reported in the groundwater. Depth to groundwater was
reported to be approximately twenty-two (22) feet bls. Groundwater flow direction was reported to the
southeast. The report proposed installation of an air sparging and soil vapor extraction (SVE) system
following free product recovery. In July 1998, the Forsyth County Garage was reclassified from a low
to intermediate -risk due to the proximity of Bowen Branch Creek (approximately 300 feet south).
Historically, up to two (2) feet of free floating product was reported in several monitoring wells.
Following remedial actions, free product thickness in the wells was reported to be up to 0.24 feet in
February 1999. BTEX concentrations were reported above NCDENR 2L Groundwater Quality
Standards in several monitoring wells. Concentrations of VOHs were detected in six (6) shallow
monitoring wells and one (1) deep monitoring well located at the Forsyth County Garage. Surface water
samples collected from Bowen Branch Creek in February 1999 did not contain detectable concentrations
of VOHs. Forsyth County Garage did not attribute the concentrations of VOHs to an on -site release.
Copies of analytical tables and site maps from the Forsyth County Garage CAP obtained during the file
review are included.
4.3.2 Sun Chemical -1100 Fairchild Road
Sun Chemical, formerly known as Thiele-Engdahl, or Zeneca Specialty Inks, located at 1100 Fairchild
Road was identified on the SHWS database. This property is located west-southwest of the Site. The
database indicates that facility identification number SIS340100526 and EPA identification number
NCDO02560159 exist for the facility. No additional information was available on the database during
CSA activities. A NCDENR file review (Incident # 16467) was conducted for the Sun Chemical
Specialty Inks located west-southwest of the site at 1100 Fairchild Road during CSA activities and
updated on May 9, 2000 during CSAA activities. NCDENR UST files were not available for review at
the time of the review update.
A March 2000 Comprehensive Site Assessment with Proposed Groundwater Corrective Action
Alternative (CSA) for the Sun Chemical facility was reviewed for current facility information. Inks
were produced at the facility since 1965. Seventeen (17) USTs were originally located at this site. In
October 1996, six (6) USTs were removed from the Site. In November 1996 a NOV was issued for
groundwater contamination which reportedly from the explosion of a toluene tanker truck and from
leaking USTs. Copies of the figures obtained during the file review are included.
BTEX, volatile organic hydrocarbons, and VOHs were detected in groundwater samples collected from
UST excavation pits and monitoring wells in October 1996. Initial remedial actions to address toluene
contamination conducted in 1997 and 1998 involved pumping 1,734 gallons of groundwater from two
(2) affected monitoring wells. The toluene plume was reported to be limited to a defined area in the
eastern portion of the site as of May 1998. Toluene and benzene were detected in samples from two (2)
on -site monitoring wells while chlorinated hydrocarbon were detected in samples collected in December
1997 from several on -site and off -site monitoring wells. Three (3) off -site monitoring wells were
included in a groundwater elevation survey during the December 1997 sampling event. Groundwater
flow was determined to be to the south and cross -gradient to the BE Site. Total VOHs were reported at
concentrations of approximately 400 µg/1 in upgradient monitoring wells located at 1105 Fairchild Road
(see Section 4.3.3).
BEA 414-02 17 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

4.3.3 Decodex —1105 Fairchild Road
A regulatory file review of documents for Decodex, also known as the B&M Property, located at 1105
Fairchild Road was conducted on May 9, 2000. Regulatory files were not maintained for the Decodex
site at the time of the CSA. 1105 Fairchild Road is located approximately 400 feet west and cross -
gradient to the BE Site. According to Mr. Don Geddes of the NCDENR Groundwater Section, the
facility was reportedly last operated as a bulk mail processing center and formerly as a medical
microfilm producer.
Based on file documents, two (2) monitoring wells were installed by Forsyth County at the Decodex
facility in 1990. An additional monitoring well was installed by Wachovia Oil, 1095 Fairchild Road, at
some other time. TCE was detected in samples collected from one of the monitoring wells in 1990. As
discussed in Section 5.3.2, total VOHs were detected at concentrations up to approximately 400 µg/l in
three (3) monitoring wells during sampling by Sun Chemical, located at 1100 Fairchild Road. No
additional assessments of the Decodex site were available. Groundwater flow at Decodex was
reportedly to the south. Copies of the figures and analytical results from the Decodex file review are
included.
4.3.4 Forsyth County Airport Commission — Fairchild Road
A regulatory file review of documents for the Forsyth County Airport Commission property, located
adjacent to 1105 Fairchild Road was conducted on May 9, 2000. Regulatory files were not maintained
for the Airport Commission property at the time of the CSA. The Airport Commission property was
located adjacent to the west of the BE Site.
Based on file documents, four (4) shallow monitoring wells were installed at the Airport Commission
property in August 1990 for unknown reasons. Groundwater samples collected from the monitoring
wells on August 16, 1990 did not contain detectable concentrations of total organic halogens or
petroleum hydrocarbons. Based on reviewed information, the monitoring wells at the Airport
Commission property were probably installed at the same time as monitoring wells at the Decodex
property, located at 1105 Fairchild Road. Contact with the bedrock surface contour in three (3) of the
monitoring wells at the Airport Commission property was reported at approximately twenty (20) feet
bls. Monitoring well installation records, site maps and laboratory results obtained during the file
review for this Site are included.
4.3.5 Wachovia Oil Co. - 1095 Fairchild Road
Wachovia Oil Co. Bulk Plant, addressed as 1095 Fairchild Road, was located approximately 600 feet
cross -gradient to the BE Site. Wachovia Oil was identified on the LUST database. Appearance on the
LUST database indicates that the facility had a release of petroleum products from one (1) or more of its
USTs. According to the database, the release occurred, or was discovered, in 1991 during an UST
excavation. The database indicates that 110 gallons of kerosene were released. A NCDENR file review
was conducted for Wachovia Oil Co. (_NPDES # NC 0084115) during the CSA and updated on May 9,
2000.
Based on file documents, soil and groundwater contamination, including free product was documented
since 1991. In May 1993, an NOV was issued for petroleum product contamination. A groundwater
treatment system operated at the site from December 1994 through March 1996. A Monitor Only Plan
BEA 414-02 18 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

(MOP) was apparently implemented in 1996 and completed in 1999. Recovery wells and monitoring
wells at the Site were abandoned in October 1999.
An NCDENR file memo, dated July 30, 1998, summarized groundwater issues as resolved. BTEX
compounds were reported below NCDENR 2L Groundwater Standards and the highest concentrations of
PCE and TCE were reported at 2.0 µg/L and 6.6 µg/L from samples collected in January 1996. The
presence of VOHs was attributed to an upgradient or cross -gradient source. According to Mr. Don
Geddes of the NCDENR Groundwater Section, an unlicensed public dump may have been present near
the Site several decades ago, which may have contributed to detected concentrations of VOHs in the
vicinity.
4.3.6 Dixie Concrete - 3300 N. Liberty Street
Dixie Concrete Co., located approximately 1/4 mile west of the Site at 3300 North Liberty Street,
appeared on the LUST database. Appearance on the LUST database indicates that the facility has had a
release of petroleum products from one (1) or more of its USTs. The database indicates that soil
contamination was discovered during a pre -purchase assessment. No additional information is available
on the database search.
A NCDENR file review was conducted for Dixie Concrete Co (no Incident #). The facility operates
storage tanks containing #2 fuel oil, kerosene, and varsol. The most recent sampling event documented
in the file, conducted in 1991, indicates that all tested parameters were below laboratory detection limits.
Regulatory files for Dixie Concrete were requested, but not available for the review update.
4.3.7 Norfolk and Western Railway Co. - 3000 North Liberty Street
Norfolk and Western Railway Co., located approximately 1/4 mile west of the site at 3000 North Liberty
Street, appeared on the LUST database. Appearance on the LUST database indicates that the facility
had a release of petroleum products from one (1) or more of its USTs. Minor soil contamination was
reported during the removal of a 10,000-gallon gasoline UST.
A NCDENR file review was requested for the Norfolk and Western Railway Co. (Incident # 10312).
However, the file was not available at the time of the file review. The file was not requested at the time
of the updated file review.
4.3.8 Davco, Inc. - 3001 North Liberty Street
Davco, Inc., located approximately 1/4 mile west of the Site at 3001 North Liberty Street, appeared on the
LUST database. Appearance on the LUST database indicates that the facility has had a release of
petroleum products from one (1) or more of its USTs. An unknown quantity of petroleum products have
impacted the soils at the Site. The discharge was reported to have occurred or been discovered on April
5, 1989, during a pre -purchase assessment. A close out report was submitted in July 1989. Information
regarding the nature and extent of the contamination was not available on the database search.
A NCDENR file review was conducted for Davco, Inc. (no Incident #). The file indicates that this
property was impacted by soil contamination in 1989. However, no groundwater contamination was
discovered or reported for the property. During the file review update, it was determined that this Site
BEA 414-02 19 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

was listed as a closed Site. No additional documents were reviewed for Davco, Inc., during the file
review update.
4.3.9 Airport Exxon - 3751 North Liberty Street
A NCDENR file review was conducted for Airport Exxon, located to the north of the site at 3751 North
Liberty Street. In November 1992, a Tank Closure Assessment Report (TCAR) was submitted for this
property. The TCAR documented elevated concentrations of petroleum products, specifically, benzene,
toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and Methyl Tert Butyl Ether (MTBE). There was no additional
information in the file concerning current groundwater or soil conditions for this property. The file was
not requested at the time of the updated file review.
4.3.10 Piedmont Aviation Services - 3821 North Liberty Street
Piedmont Aviation Services, located greater than one-half ('/z) mile north-northwest of the Site at 3817
North Liberty Street was identified on the RCRIS-LQG, RCRIS-TSD and UST databases. Appearance
on the RCRIS-LQG and RCRIS-TSD databases indicates that the site generates large quantities of
hazardous waste regulated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The facility uses,
stores, and/or disposes of ignitable and reactive hazardous wastes, cadmium, chromium, benzene,
tetrachloroethylene, spent halogenated solvents, wastewater treatment sludges, and various forms of
waste and sludge from cyanide plating bath solutions.
A NCDENR file review was conducted for Piedmont Aviation Services (Incident # 12695). The file
listed the address for this facility as 3821 North Liberty Street. A TCAR was prepared in April 1993,
which documented petroleum contamination in the groundwater. In September 1994, the NCDENR
issued an NOV to the facility requesting additional information for the TCAR. There was no additional
information in the file concerning current groundwater or soil conditions for this property.
Based on updated file documents, 140 tons of petroleum contaminated soil was excavated and removed
from the Site in 1994. Soil contamination by VOHs was reported at approximately 1,800 µg/L.
Assessment at Piedmont Aviation Services was apparently terminated abruptly. No groundwater
assessment or closure documents were present in the file.
4.3.11 US Air Maintenance Facility - 4001 North Liberty Street
A NCDENR file review was conducted for the US Air Maintenance Facility (Incident # 6211) located to
the north of the Site at 4001 North Liberty Street. According to information contained in the file, this
property has removed numerous USTs containing Jet A, gasoline, and waste oil. Soil and groundwater
contamination were documented at this property, including up to two and one-half (2'/2) feet of free
floating product. Groundwater contamination by TCE and PCE was also documented in the file. A
groundwater remedial system consisting of an oil/water separator, air stripping tower, and carbon
canisters were operating at the site at the time of the file review.
Based on updated file documents, at least one area of the US Air site was impacted by ethylene glycol
(antifreeze) from one (1) or more USTs. A February 1996 report requested site closure. The extent of
ethylene glycol in the soil and groundwater was defined to an area near the USTs. The US Air file was
not complete, and no documents pertaining to previously reported TCE and PCE contamination were
available.
BEA 414-02 20 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

4.3.12 Sam's Curbside Market - 4215 North Liberty Street
A NCDENR file review was conducted for Sam's Curbside Market (Incident #6291), located west-
northwest of the Site at 4215 North Liberty Street. According to a CSA prepared in November 1993,
this facility was formerly a gasoline and service station. When USTs were removed in 1990,
approximately thirty (30) inches of free floating product was observed on the groundwater. PCE and
TCE were also detected in two (2) on -site wells. An oil recovery system was installed at this property to
remediate the petroleum contamination. In a letter dated January 1997, the facility reports that
approximately 6,000 gallons of petroleum gasoline were recovered. Due to this property's distance from
the Site (greater than a mile), no further investigation into this property is recommended. The file was
not requested at the time of the updated file review.
4.4 INTERVIEWS
Information gathered during the database search and NCDENR file review was supplemented with
information supplied by persons knowledgeable about the site and surrounding properties.
4.4.1 The Site
Information concerning current and historic operating practices and operations at the Site were obtained
through conversations with Mr. A. Javan Whitt, Facility Manager at the former Burns Aerospace
Facility and his successor, Mr. Dan Schweit. All hazardous wastes are currently maintained in the
Hazardous Waste Storage Area. Smaller quantities of oils and petroleum products are stored in Building
1 A for use to operate and maintain machinery. PCE, TCE, and 1,1,1-TCA were used historically at the
Site. When BE began manufacturing at the Site in 1996, PCE and TCE were phased out of use. TCE
and PCE are not currently stored or used in the manufacturing process.
Historically, a PCE Vapor Degreaser was located in the northwest corner of the Building 1, in the
vicinity of the Courtyard. Mr. Whitt indicated that a TCE vapor degreaser was located in Building 1 A,
also near the Courtyard. According to Mr. Whitt, the Fairchild Storage Shed was removed from the
property in 1989.
Mr. Steve Phibbs of the NCDENR was contacted regarding the current RCRA status of the facility. Mr.
Phibbs indicated that the facility is currently a large quantity generator of EPA Waste Code F019
hazardous wastes. Mr. Phibbs confirmed that PCE was not stored at the Site to his knowledge.
4.4.2 Airport Landfill
Information regarding a closed public sanitary landfill known as the "Airport Landfill" was obtained
during telephone conversations with Mr. Barry Sherrie, Supervisor, and Ms. Melinda Jacobson, Planner,
Forsyth County Public Utilities. According to the information provided, the Airport Landfill was
located on the eastern slope of the main runway of the Smith -Reynolds Airport and operated from the
1960s until 1972, when it was closed. The Airport Landfill accepted domestic garbage only, and no
hazardous or industrial wastes were knowingly accepted. No soil or groundwater monitoring data was
available, as landfills were not monitored in Forsyth County prior to 1980. The Airport Landfill
occupied approximately fifteen (15) acres according to aerial photograph measurements. The landfill
was unlined and was located less than 2,000 feet east, cross -gradient of the Site.
BEA 414-02 21 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

4.4.3 Decodex, 1105 Fairchild Road
As discussed in Section 5.3, Mr. Don Geddes of the NCDENR Groundwater Section provided
information pertaining to the Decodex site, located at 1105 Fairchild Road. Mr. Geddes mentioned that
some evidence and purported history indicated that an unregulated public dumpsite may have existed
near the Decodex or Wachovia Oil sites several decades ago. Mr. Geddes also mentioned that the
Decodex site was formerly used to produce medical microfilm, and was most recently reported to be
used as a bulk mail -processing center.
BEA 414-02 22 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

5.0 POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
The evaluation of potential exposure pathways of contamination present at the Site included
downgradient water supply wells located within 1,500 feet of the Site, and surface water bodies within
one-half ('/z) mile of the Site. Adjacent property owners were also evaluated as potential receptors.
Potential migration pathways include underground utilities and groundwater migration. This section
discusses the procedures and results of the surveys performed to identify potential receptors and
migration pathways in the vicinity of the Site.
A branch of the Bowen Branch Creek and vapor intrusion into buildings were identified as potential
receptors of site contamination. No public or private drinking water supplies were identified within
1,500 feet and one-half mile downgradient radius, respectively. Shallow and deep groundwater
migration were identified as potential migration pathways for PCE in groundwater.
Potential receptors were investigated by a review of area maps, a neighborhood survey, and interviews
with public employees. The identification of potential receptors is necessary to evaluate the design and
selection of a remedial plan and evaluation of cleanup levels.
5.1.1 Surface Water
A review of detailed area maps indicated that a branch of the Bowen Branch Creek is located
approximately 600 feet south of the Site. The branch of the Bowen Branch Creek flows generally from
the northwest to the southeast, beginning near industrial facilities located along North Liberty Street and
continuing along Fairchild Road and into residential areas to the southeast. Bowen Branch Creek flows
south along the eastern boundary of the Smith -Reynolds Airport, approximately 1,000 feet east of the
Site. The Bowen Branch Creek flows into Salem Creek downstream of Salem Lake. No other surface
waters were identified within 1,500 feet of the Site. Winston Lake was located approximately 3,000 feet
southeast of the Site.
5.1.2 Public Water Supply
Information was gathered on the location of public water supply, private water supply wells, and
irrigation wells in the vicinity of the Site. The sources for public water in Forsyth County are the
Yadkin River and Salem Lake. Salem Lake is located approximately 1.25 miles southeast and upstream
from the Site.
5.1.3 Private Water Supply Wells
A review of Forsyth County Department of Health water well registration indicated that no private water
wells were registered in the area. No residential properties were located within 1,500-feet of the Site. A
water well survey performed in 1997 included a physical inspection of streets located within a 1,500-
foot radius of the Site using public roads. No pumps, pump houses, or indications of private water
supply wells were observed during the inspection, and public utility works were observed on all of the
streets.
5.2 MIGRATION PATHWAYS
A utility drainage survey and review of groundwater flow patterns at the Site were conducted to evaluate
potential migration pathways.
BEA 414-02 23 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

5.2.1 Utility Drainage Survey
A subsurface drainage system is present at the Site. CRB conducted a drainage system survey at the Site
in October 1996. A site map showing the layout of the drainage system is presented. Potential
contaminant migration flow along the drainage system was investigated during the soil gas survey (see
Section 6.0). Although minor levels of contamination were detected at the bottom of the stormwater
outfall during the soil gas survey, the results of the drainage system investigation suggested that the
system did not significantly affect the distribution of contamination in the soils and groundwater at the
site.
5.2.2 Groundwater Migration
As previously discussed in Section 2.3.2, shallow groundwater flow at the Site is towards the south.
Bedrock groundwater flow is towards the south-southwest based on available data. A plateau of
partially weathered rock and bedrock is present in the northeast quadrant of the Site that slopes away to
the south and west. Bedrock contact in the southeastern portion of the site is below forty-eight (48) feet
bls.
5.3 CONCLUSIONS
A branch of the Bowen Branch Creek and adjacent properties were identified as potential receptors of
on -site contamination. No public or private drinking water supplies were identified within a 1,500-foot
and one-half mile downgradient radius, respectively.
Shallow and deep groundwater migration were identified as potential migration pathways for on -site
contaminants. The shallow groundwater flow at the Site is to the south. Bedrock groundwater flows
preferentially to the south-southwest as determined by the groundwater elevation survey. The on -site
utility drainage system is not considered a significant migration pathway based on the drainage survey
and soil gas results (see Section Error! Reference source not found.) since it is above the groundwater
table.
5.4 LAND USE CONCLUSIONS
The Site and surrounding properties were investigated to determine current and past land use that may
affect the soils and groundwater at the Site. The results of the Site and surrounding property land use
investigation indicate industrial land use throughout the area encompassing the site over the past several
decades and multiple potential source areas in the vicinity of the BE Facility. Historically, PCE, TCE,
and other chlorinated solvents were stored on -site at the BE Facility. Documented groundwater
contamination by chlorinated solvents including PCE and TCE has been reported at adjacent properties
to the south and west. To the north, and upgradient, documented petroleum groundwater contamination
has been reported at the US Air Facility located at 4001 North Liberty Street. However, no documented
groundwater contamination was reported at properties immediately upgradient to the BE facility. The
Airport Landfill, which operated in the 1960s to 1972, was identified as a potential historic off -site
concern.
BEA 414-02 24 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

6.0 REMEDIAL ACTION EVALUATION
Remediation performed at the Site beginning in 2001 through December 2012 included soil vapor
extraction, groundwater recovery, groundwater aeration, and on -going groundwater bioremediation.
Summaries of remedial action perfonmed at the Site are presented below.
6.1 REMEDIAL ACTION HISTORY
A Remedial Action Plan (RAP) was submitted to the NCDWM in October 2003, which proposed a
comprehensive remedial strategy for the Site. Voluntary implementation of the 2003 RAP was initiated
in May 2004 with soil excavation followed by installation of soil vapor extraction systems in December
2004 and May 2005. Voluntary implementation of groundwater remediation proposed in the 2003 RAP
was initiated in March 2006 and July 2006 with the construction of groundwater aeration wells and
bioremediation injection wells, respectively.
A revised Closure Plan for the Site was submitted to the NCDWM in June 2005, and was approved in a
letter from NCDWM dated June 29, 2007. A Post -Closure Plan was submitted to NCDWM in
December 2008 for the former HWSA located at the Site. Approval of the Post -Closure Plan was given
by NCDWM on October 15, 2009. Groundwater monitoring included in this report for the former
HWSA is performed in accordance with the approved Post -Closure Plan. A deed notice and site plat
was recorded with the Forsyth County Register of Deeds during July 2009, in accordance with the
Closure Plan and Post -Closure Plan requirements.
In April 2011, the NCDWQ issued a renewal of Underground Injection (UIC) Permit Number
W 10400074 for the Site. The UIC Permit was obtained in order to perform additional injections of
bioremediation substrate at the Site.
6.2 SOIL REMEDIATION
In 2004, soil was removed from the HWSA and SWMUs impacted by soil contamination. Soil removal
activities are described below.
6.2.1 Hazardous Waste Storage Area
Hazardous waste is no longer stored at the HWMU and closure was performed in May 2004. Closure
consisted of the demolition of the former container storage area, excavation of contaminated soils
surrounding the container storage area and the installation of an impermeable surface in the area of
excavated soils. Removal of contaminated soils associated with the HWSA and in -situ treatment of
inaccessible soil and groundwater contamination associated with the HWMU is being addressed as part
of the overall groundwater remediation and monitoring program as described in the RAP (CRB 2003).
Removal of contaminated soil from the HWSA, performed in May 2004, is described below.
A steel post and wooden roof sh,-d was removed from the HWSA prior to the excavation of
contaminated soil. The shed did not have walls and did not contact waste material. The shed roof and
post material was disposed as construction & demolition waste. Approximately 400 square feet of
asphalt paving from the HWSA was excavated and characterized with soil during June 2004. No other
structures were associated with the HWSA.
BEA 414-02 25 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

6.2.1.1 Decontamination of HWMU
Based on the results of the CSAA, surficial and/or shallow soil contamination was identified in the
vicinity of the HWSA. Accessible soil was excavated from the HWSA during June 2003. Clean closure
of the HWSA was not achieved due to unexcavated soil in the southeastern portion of the HWSA near a
buried electrical line. Asphalt ground surfacing was disposed with excavated soil in May 2004. A
description of the excavation and disposal of contaminated soil is provided below.
6.2.1.2 HWMU remediation
The area of soil contamination identified in the CSAA was excavated from the HWMU as shown. The
extents of the excavation were determined based on organic vapor analyzer (OVA/PID) measurements,
odors and visual staining. PCE contaminated soils were limited to a grassy area south of the former
shed. PCE odors and concentrations were noticeable in the upper five (5) feet of the excavation.
Contaminated soil was excavated to a depth of approximately six (6) feet below land surface (bls).
Based on laboratory analysis of confirmation soil samples collected from the excavation walls and base,
the excavation extended beyond the limits of PCE concentrations with the exception of a small area of in
the southeastern corner of the excavation. This area remained unexcavated due to the proximity of a
buried electric line and power pole. The remaining contaminated soil was located beneath the edge of
the parking lot asphalt.
Soil contaminated with TPH and Oil & Grease (O&G) was excavated from the area of the storage shed
to a depth of approximately three (3) feet bls. Confirmation samples were collected from the walls and
base of the storage shed pad. Confirmation sampling locations and results are provided. Approximately
ninety (90) cubic yards of soil were excavated from the HWSA in May of 2004. The excavation was
performed by Soil Solutions, Inc., (SSI) of Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and was supervised by CRB
field personnel. Excavated soil was staged and covered in 10-cubic yard roll -off containers for analysis
and characterization.
6.2.1.3 Soil Characterization
Soil from each 10-cubic yard container was sampled for analyses of total concentrations VOCs and
metals, and for leachate concentrations by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP).
Concentrations of metals and organic compounds were below levels established for Characteristic Waste
designations. Based on guidance from the North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section "Contained -In"
waste policy, soil excavated from the HWSA contained total concentrations of metals and PCE above
unrestricted use levels. The concentrations of metals and PCE were not attributed to a known waste
stream, and were not identified as listed hazardous wastes. Laboratory analytical results of the
excavated soil were submitted to the NCDWM for review and approval prior to transportation of the soil
off -site. A summary of soil characterization analyses is provided.
6.2.1.4 Soil Disposal
The soil was transported as non -hazardous waste to the SSI facility for biological treatment of
concentrations of PCE and O&G. Reduction of PCE concentrations below the detectable level of 5.8
µg/kg was accomplished in February 2005. Total concentrations of metals in the soil were above
unrestricted use levels. The soil was transported from Soil Solutions, Inc., to the Uwharrie Subtitle D
Municipal Solid Waste Landfill, in Troy, North Carolina for disposal as non -hazardous waste in April
BEA 414-02 26 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

2005. A total of 314 tons of soil was excavated and treated off -site beginning in May 2004. Copies of
soil disposal manifests are included as Appendix I.
6.2.2 Solid Waste Management Units
Areas at the Site identified as SWMUs, and referenced in the AOC, included the FSS, the SWO, the
ACA, and the CYA. These areas were not designated for the management of solid or hazardous waste,
but were identified as SWMUs due to the presence of soil or groundwater contamination. Removal of
contaminated soil from the SWMU, performed in June 2004, is described below.
6.2.2.1 SWMU Remediation
Soil contamination was delineated in the FSS as reported in the CSA and CSAA. Locations of
monitoring wells and soil borings in the FSS are shown. Based on the previous delineation and
proximity to underground utilities, approximately seventy (70) cubic yards of soil were excavated from
the FFS in June of 2004. The area of soil contamination excavated from the FSS in June 2004 is shown.
The excavation was performed by SSI and was supervised by CRB field personnel. Excavated soil was
staged and covered in 10-cubic yard roll -off containers for analysis and characterization.
The extents of the excavation in the FSS were determined based on OVA/PID measurements, odors and
visual staining. PCE contaminated soils were prevalent around the southern corner of the concrete pad
and extended to a depth of approximately six (6) feet below land surface. Based on the results of
confirmation samples collected from the FSS excavation, soil contaminated with PCE, TPH, and O&G
were excavated to practical limits. Due to the presence of a natural gas line and a power pole, PCE
contaminated soil remained inaccessible beneath the corner of the concrete slab. A summary of
confirmation soil samples collected from the FSS excavation is included.
The area of the SWO was accessed using a skid -steer loader in May 2004 in order to excavate the area
of soil contamination identified in the CSAA. However, due to the serious erosion of several feet of soil
from stormwater drainage since the completion CSAA, original soil in the SWO area was not present
and no soil was excavated from the SWO. Soil in the ACA was effectively capped with a concrete slab
and a newly constructed chiller unit in 2002. The new concrete pad completely covered the area of
shallow soil contamination identified in the CSAA and no soil was excavated from the ACA.
6.2.2.2 Soil Characterization
Soil from each 10-cubic yard container was sampled for analyses of total concentrations VOCs and
metals, and for leachate concentrations by TCLP. Soil analytical results for the excavation soil were
submitted to the NCDWM for review and approval prior to transportation off -site. A summary of soil
characterization results for soil excavated from the FSS is provided.
6.2.2.3 Soil Disposal
Based on soil characterization results, soil excavated from the FSS was identified as non -hazardous
waste by TCLP analysis, but contained concentrations of metals and PCE above unrestricted use levels
described in the "Contained -In" policy of the NCDWM. Accordingly, the soil was transported to the
SSI facility for biological treatment of concentrations of PCE and petroleum hydrocarbons. The
reduction of PCE concentrations below the detectable level of 5.8 µg/kg was accomplished in February
2005. Total concentrations of metals were above unrestricted use concentrations in the treated soil. A
BEA 414-02 27 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

total of 314 tons of soil were transported to Republic Industries Uwharrie Landfill, in Troy, North
Carolina, for disposal as non -hazardous waste in April 2005. Soil disposal manifests are included as
Appendix I.
6.2.3 Soil Vapor Extraction
Since 2004, SVE systems have operated to remove source material in the soil column of the three (3)
source areas at the Site. Was performed at the Site during the April 2012 quarterly monitoring period in
order to remove residual source material from inaccessible soils in the CYA and the HWS. SVE was
initiated in the CYA in August 2005 with vapor extraction from three (3) vent wells, CYA SVE-1, CYA
SVE-2, and CYA SVE-3.
SVE was initiated in the HWS in July 2005 and continued through October 2010 with vapor extraction
from one vent well HWS SVE-1 installed to a depth of fifty-five (55) feet and two (2) soil vapor inlet
wells installed to depths of twenty-five (25) feet.
6.3 GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION
Groundwater remediation at the Site consists of in -situ bioremediation of the plume and boundary
migration control using a series of five (5) aeration wells. A description of these remediation programs
is presented below.
6.3.1 Aeration Wells
In March 2006, five (5) aeration wells AW-1 through AW-5, were installed along the southern property
boundary in order to mitigate off -site migration of groundwater concentrations. The aeration wells were
installed with dual screened zones above bedrock contact at approximately a depth of forty to sixty (40-
60) feet and to ten (10) feet above the water table. Based on down -hole flow measurements, the aeration
wells recover, strip, and recharge groundwater at a rate of two to four (2-4) gallons per minute. The
aeration blower was off-line during April 2012 to perform motor repair.
The aeration wells were designed as air-lift circulation wells to withdraw migrating groundwater in the
lower screen section followed by in -situ stripping and venting of VOCs from the withdrawn
groundwater, and then recharging the treated groundwater through an upper screen installed in the
vadose zone. The aeration wells will continue to operate as a boundary control remediation technology.
The effect of boundary remediation is considered to be significant in the continued reduction in surface
water concentrations of PCE measured through 2012.
6.3.2 In -Situ Reductive Dechlorination
A total of thirty-nine (39) injection wells and nine (9) temporary injection points were installed at the
site during June 2006 and injection of a lactate/soybean oil bioremediation substrate was performed to
stimulate anaerobic degradation of the chlorinated ethenes.
The continued reductive dechlorination of PCE and generation of breakdown products l,l-DCE, cis-
DCE, and vinyl chloride confirm bioremediation is occurring. Additional bioremediation injections are
planned for the fall of 2012 to create more favorable geochemical conditions for reductive
dechlorination. Monitoring of bioremediation parameters will resume from select monitoring wells
during in accordance with the 2011 UIC Permit.
BEA 414-02 28 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

7.0 REFERENCES
CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Comprehensive Site Assessment, BE Aerospace Facility, 1455
Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, September 1997.
CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Comprehensive Site Assessment Addendum, BE Aerospace
Facility, 1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, July 2000.
CRB Geological & Environmental Services, RCRA Closure Plan, BE Aerospace Facility, 1455 Fairchild
Road Winston-Salem, North Carolina, June 2005.
BEA 414-02 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc.

APPENDIX I
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT
SEPTEMBER 2012

W6EN
North Carolina Department of Envirorment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue Dexter R. Matthews
Govemor Director
September 27, 2012
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mitch Barger
Facility Manager
BE Aerospace, Incorporated
1455 Fairchild Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
RE: Administrative Order in Lieu of Post -Closure Permit
BE Aerospace, Incorporated
Winston-Salem, NC
EPA ID # NCD 060 302 577
Dear Mr. Barger:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Please find enclosed one (1) signed original of the final "Administrative Order in Lieu of
Post -Closure Permit" (Order) for the BE Aerospace, Incorporated facility located in Winston-Salem,
NC. The date the Order was signed by the NC Hazardous Waste Section, September 28, 2012, is the
effective date of the Order.
If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact Larry Stanley at
[phone] or at Larry. [e-mail].
Sincerely,
El' th W. Cannon, Chief
N azardous Waste Section
Enclosure: Administrative Order in Lieu of Post -Closure Permit
1W Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
PhoneTax: 919-707-82001 Intemet: http/i:portal.ncdenr.org/webtwm
Noe Carolina
An Equal Opportunily % AfArmalive Action Employer -W.4 P,,---ycW 1 % Pant Consumer Piper

Mr. Barger
Page 2
September 27, 2012
cc: Jon D. Johnston, US EPA, Region 4
J. Dudley Watts, Jr., Forsyth County Manager
Marlon B. Hunter, Forsyth County Department of Public Health
Minor Barnette, Forsyth County Depart. of Environmental Assist. and Protection
Lee Garrity, Winston-Salem City Manager
Ryan Patch, BE Aerospace
Ernie Lawrence
Larry Stanley
rc: Bud McCarty
Qu Qi
Larry Stanley

North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Re: HS Aerospace, Inc. ) Administrative Order
1455 Fairchild Road ) in Lieu of Post -Closure Permit
Winston-Salem, NC )
SPA ID # NCD 060 302 577 ) Docket Number: (2012-076)

BE Aerospace AOC
STRA1TIVE ORDER IN LIEU OF POST -CLOSURE PST
TAIME OF CON'PffiM
Section
Page Number
I.
Statement of Purpose
4
II.
Jurisdiction
5
III.
Stipulations of Fact
6
IV.
Conclusions of Law and Determinations
14
V.
Scope of Work
18
VI.
Data Quality Assurance and Quality Control
26
VII.
Property Access and Sampling Access
27
VIII.
Data Collection/Document Availability/
28
Reporting Requirements
IX.
Inspection and Training Requirements
31
X.
Cost Estimate, Financial Assurance, and
32
Adjustments
XI.
Public Participation
34
XII.
Delay in Performance
35
XIII.
Dispute Resolution
36
XIV.
Satisfaction of Order
37
XV.
Change of ownership or Operational Control
38
XVI.
Decisions/Notifications
39
XVII.
Notice of Non -Liability of State
40
XVIII. Reservation of Rights
41
XIX.
Other Claims
43
XX.
Indemnification of State
44
XXI.
Additional Provisions
45

BE Aerospace AOC
Attachments Page Number
Attachment A: Isoconcentration Map: PCE in Groundwater 47
Attachment B: Historic Groundwater Analytical Results 49
Attachment C: Injection Well and Aeration Well Locations 60
Attachment D: AOC (Docket #99-126) 62
Attachment E: Schedule of Compliance
3
74

BE Aerospace AOC
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Administrative Order in Lieu of Post -Closure Permit
Re: BE Aerospace, Inc. (Operator) Three Aircraft Seats (DE), L.P. (Owner)
1455 Fairchild Road 1400 Corporate Center Way
Winston-Salem, NC 27105 Wellington, FL 33414
EPA ID # NCD 060 302 577
Docket Number: (2012-076)
BE Aerospace, Incorporated and the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Division of Waste Management (the Division), acting through its
Hazardous Waste Section (the Section) (collectively the Parties) enter into this
Administrative Order in Lieu of Post -Closure Permit (Order) for the Facility
identified and further described herein.
I. Statement of Purpose
A. This Order concerns the application to the Facility of the North
Carolina Solid Waste Management Act (the Act) contained in Chapter 130A
of the North Carolina General Statutes and the rules promulgated
thereunder and codified in Subchapter 13A of Title 15A of the North
Carolina Administrative Code (the State Hazardous Waste Rules), and the
federal Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. 6901 et
seq., to the Facility. The purpose of this Order is to provide an
enforceable Order in lieu of a post -closure permit, including
corrective actions to be taken, for the BE Aerospace, Inc. facility
located at 1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (the
Facility) in a manner that is consistent with State and federal laws
and rules.
B. The Parties stipulate that the objectives for completion of the work
required by this Order are: (1) to identify all releases of hazardous
waste, hazardous constituents, and petroleum constituents; (2) to
remove imminent threats to human health and the errvironment through
source removal or treatment; (3) to characterize the Facility's
geologic and hydrogeologic conditions and determine the extent of
contamination; (4) to perform corrective action at the Facility, and
beyond the Facility boundaries as necessary, to include, at a minimum,
establishing remediation goals for the Facility and conducting
remediation to meet those goals; (5) to implement and maintain a
comprehensive monitoring program until remediation is complete; (6) to
provide opportunities for public participation; and (7) to provide
financial assurance for assessment and remediation.
C. This document constitutes an Order of the Secretary of the Department
of Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of N.C.G.S. §
130A-18(a).
D. Therefore, to further the public interest the Parties enter into
this Order.
4

BE Aerospace AOC
II. Jurisdiction
A. The Division has authority pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 130-290, et seq., to
require corrective action by owners and operators with respect to
facilities at which hazardous wastes were generated and treatment,
storage, or disposal has occurred.
B. Although this Order requires corrective action mandated by 40 CFR
264.101 and 265.121, incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0109(g)
and .0110(g), BE Aerospace, Inc. stipulates to issuance of this Order
without a hearing and to compliance with the terms of the Order.
Subject to its ability to bring disputes pursuant to Paragraph XIII of
this Order and its other legal rights, BE Aerospace, Inc. further
stipulates that it will not contest the Section's jurisdiction to issue
the Order, to require compliance with the Order, to compel compliance
with the Order in any subsequent enforcement proceeding, either
administrative or judicial, or to impose sanctions for any violation of
the Order.
5

BE Aerospace AOC
III. Stipulations of Fact
A. Authority of the Hazardous Waste Section
1. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has
authorized North Carolina to operate the State RCRA Hazardous
Waste Program in accordance with the Act and the Rules.
2. The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (the Department or DENR) is authorized and required to
enforce the laws and rules governing the management of solid
waste, including hazardous waste. The Secretary has delegated
this authority and responsibility to the Director of the
Division. The Director has issued a sub -delegation of this
authority and responsibility to the Chief of the Hazardous Waste
Section, Elizabeth W. Cannon.
B. General Facility Information
1. BE Aerospace, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of
Delaware and is authorized to do business in this North Carolina.
2. Fairchild Industrial Products, Inc. developed the site as a
manufacturing facility in 1968. (Prior its development as a
manufacturing facility, the site was part of a runway for the
Smith -Reynolds Airport.) Fairchild manufactured interior
products for the airline industry. The Facility was subsequently
purchased by Burns Aerospace, which continued the production of
established product lines. BE Aerospace acquired the Facility in
1995 and expanded operations to produce aircraft seating along
with other aircraft products. Three Aircraft Seats (DE), L.P.
purchased the property in 2002 and leased the property to BE
Aerospace, Inc. BE Aerospace continues to operate at the site
and produces aircraft seat components.
C. Facility Information - Physical Description
1. The Facility is defined as the BE Aerospace manufacturing
property addressed as 1455 Fairchild Road in northeast Winston-
Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina. The Facility is located
on the north side of Fairchild Road and is used as a
manufacturing complex. The Facility occupies approximately 31
acres and consists of five manufacturing buildings, a trailer
used for temporary office space, a product testing building,
several small storage buildings, paved parking areas, and
landscaped areas. In addition to the manufacturing complex, the
Facility :includes undeveloped woodland located along the east
property line and in the southwest corner of the property.
2. The area surrounding the Facility is occupied by commercial and
industrial facilities. The Facility is bordered by Smith -
Reynolds Airport to the north, west and east. All property
adjoining the Facility is owned by Forsyth County. Buildings
located south of the Facility (and south of Fairchild Road) are
occupied by the Forsyth County Agricultural Extension Service
Office, the Forsyth County Garage, and the Forsyth County Animal
P

BE Aerospace AOC
Shelter. Several additional commercial/ industrial buildings are
located north, west, and southwest of the Facility. These
properties include the former Wachovia Oil Company, Sun Chemical,
Multicraft Industrial, and the Forsyth County Fire Department
Headquarters Station #6.
3. The nearest residences to the BE Aerospace Facility are located
approximately 1,500 feet southwest of the property boundary. No
private drinking water wells were identified within a 1,500-foot
radius of the Facility, and no public water supplies were located
up to one-half mile downgradient of the Facility.
4. The Facility topography slopes slightly west and south toward a
branch of Brushy Fork Creek. (This branch of Brushy Fork Creek
is referred to as Bowen Creek or Bowen Branch Creek in Facility
documents.) Bowen Creek is located within 500 feet of the
southwest corner of the Facility. Bowen Creek generally flows
from northwest to southeast, beginning near industrial facilities
located along North Liberty Street and continuing along Fairchild
Road and into residential areas to the southeast. A separate
branch of Brushy Fork Creek is located approximately 1,000 feet
east of the site. Winston Lake is located 3,000 feet southeast
of the site.
5. The BE Aerospace Facility lies within the Central Piedmont
Physiographic Province of North Carolina. Bedrock at the
site is consistent with the metamorphic gneiss and schist
lithology of the Charlotte Belt. Geologic materials
encountered during soil boring and well installation
included fill material, saprolite, partially weathered
bedrock, competent bedrock, and less competent bedrock.
Weathered bedrock was encountered at depths of
approximately 25 feet below ground surface. Competent
bedrock was encountered beginning from 34 to 50 feet below
grade in the northern portion of the site. Up to two feet
of partially weathered rock was generally encountered above
the bedrock contact. A zone of fractures was typically
encountered in the upper 20-feet of competent bedrock. In
the southern portion of the site, the bedrock surface was
characterized as a pit with the deepest contact measured at
approximately 120-feet below land surface at monitoring
well MW-22D. A southwardly plunging ridge of partially
weathered rock and bedrock approximately bisects the site.
From the central bedrock ridge, structure of the bedrock
contact surface is interpreted as a north to south trough
along the western property boundary with steep elevation
rise toward bedrock outcrops observed on the undeveloped
property west of the site.
6. Well soundings conducted at the Facility during the April
2012 monitoring event reported that depths to groundwater
in the saprolite ranged from approximately 20 feet to
approximately 55 feet. Groundwater flow in the saprolite
generally mimics topography and is toward the south.
Groundwater in the bedrock also flows south but with a
slightly more southwesterly component of groundwater flow
7

BE Aerospace AOC
19
than is evident in the saprolite. Reports document an
upward hydraulic gradient from the bedrock to the saprolite
across the site.
Facility Information - Waste Generation and Management, Environmental
Investigations, and Remedial Actions
1. The current understanding of waste generation and
management, environmental investigations, and remedial
actions is based upon the following documents:
Comprehensive Site Assessment (1997)
"Administrative Order on Consent - Docket #99-126" (1999)
Closure Plan for the Former HWSA (1999)
Comprehensive Site Assessment Addendum (2000)
Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Plan (2000)
Results of Surface Water Sampling (2000)
Interim Groundwater Remediation Workplan (2001)
Remedial Action Plan (2003)
Closure Plan/Closure Report (2005)
Revised Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Plan (2006)
Data Gap Assessment for BE Aerospace, Inc. (2007)
"Former Hazardous Waste Storage Area -Additional Soil
Sampling Results" (2008)
Post Closure Plan (2009)
"Environmental Indicator Evaluation" (2010)
Revised "Part A Permit Application" (2010)
"Underground Injection Permit WI0400074" (2011)
Groundwater monitoring reports have been submitted at
prescribed intervals since 1999. Results of the Facility's
surface water monitoring activities are included in
groundwater monitoring reports.
2. BE Aerospace manufactures aircraft seat components.
Manufacturing operations include metal fabrication, metal
finishing, seat fabrication, and seat assembly. EPA waste codes
for hazardous waste currently generated and managed at the
Facility are D001 (flammable), D002 (corrosive), D035 (methyl
ethyl ketone), F002 (halogenated/non-halogenated mixture), F003
(non -halogenated solvents), and F005 (non -halogenated solvents).
When Fairchild Industrial Products operated the Facility; airline
seating, pneumatic pumps, and industrial controls were the
predominant products. These historic operations generated
hazardous wastes that were assigned four listed waste codes (F001
(halogenated solvents used in degreasing), F002, F003, and F019
(wastewater treatment sludge from the chemical conversion coating
of aluminum)) and six characteristic waste codes (D001, D002,
D006 (cadmium), D007 (chromium), D008 (lead), and D035).
BE Aerospace determined that soil and groundwater
contamination at the Facility resulted from unknown sources
prior to ownership of the facility by BE Aerospace. Upon
taking ownership of the business, BE Aerospace eliminated
the use of chemicals which were associated with the soil
8

BE Aerospace AOC
and groundwater releases. Beginning in 2001, BE Aerospace
implemented "voluntary" soil and groundwater remediation.
4. The potential for soil contamination was investigated during a
series of assessments. The investigations consisted of field
screening of on -site soils, collection and analysis of soil gas
samples, installation of soil borings, and collection of soil
samples for laboratory analysis. Soil impacted with volatile
organic compounds was identified at SWMU 1-Former Fairchild
Storage Shed, SWMU 4-Courtyard Area, and SWMU 5-Former Hazardous
Waste Storage Area.
S. Contaminated soil was excavated at SWMU 1-Former Fairchild
Storage Shed and SWMU 5-Former Hazardous Waste Storage Area.
Contaminated soil was disposed of off -site. Soil at AOC 1-
Methylene Chloride Spill Area was also reported to have been
excavated.
6. Soil vapor extraction (SVS) systems were installed at SWMU 1-
Former Fairchild Storage Area, SWMU 4-Courtyard Area, and SWMU 5-
Former Hazardous Waste Storage Area. The SVE system at SWMU 1
operated from 2004 to 2006. At the time of system shutdown,
organic vapor concentrations were below detection limits. The
SVE systems at SWMU 4 and SWMU 5 were installed in 2005 and
continue to operate.
7. Historically, constituents in groundwater that have exceeded 15
NCAC 2L Groundwater Standards include tetrachloroethene (PCE),
trichloroethene (TCE), 1,1-dichloroethene, cis-1,2-
dichloroethene, 1,1,1-trichloroethene, chloroform, 1,4-dioxane,
and vinyl chloride. Impacts to groundwater at concentrations
exceeding NC 2L Groundwater Standards have been linked to SWMU 1-
Former Fairchild Storage Area, SWMU 4-Courtyard Area, SW4U 5-
Former Hazardous Waste Storage Area, and AOC 1-Methylene Chloride
Spill Area. Site -wide, the highest concentrations have been
reported for PCE, and PCE is also the most widely distributed
groundwater contaminant. (Attachment A: Isoconcentration Map -
PCE in Groundwater and Attachment B: Historic Groundwater
Analytical Results).
S. Groundwater and surface water data indicate that impacted
groundwater originating at the Facility discharges to Bowen
Creek. Historically, PCE has been detected in Bowen Creek at
concentrations exceeding NC 2B Surface Water Standards. In 2006,
the NC Division of Water Quality posted the creek as a no contact
surface water body because of pesticides and inorganic compounds
detected in the creek at sampling locations upstream from the
Facility. Signage placed at several points along the creek by
DWQ prohibits human contact with creek water.
9. Groundwater discharges to the land surface at a seep that is
located within the footprint of the PCE groundwater plume. The
seep is on the north bank of Bowen Creek. PCE has been detected
in samples of the seep water at concentrations exceeding NC 2B
Surface Water Standards. An aeration well system is located at
the southern boundary of the BE Aerospace property to mitigate
0

BE Aerospace AOC
PCB migration. Groundwater containing VOC's is captured and
treated before leaving the Facility property and therefore,
before discharging to Bowen Creek or the seep.
10. Thirty-nine injection wells and nine temporary injection points
have been installed at the site. The injection wells were
installed near SWMU 4-Courtyard Area and along four lines that
transect the groundwater plume. Lactate/ soybean oil (electron
donor) has been injected on several occasions. The Facility was
issued an Underground Injection Control renewal permit by the NC
Division of Water Quality (Underground Injection Control
Program). The renewal permit allows the Facility to treat
impacted groundwater by injecting Newman Zone", KB-1* microbes,
and EHC' into the subsurface (Attachment C: Injection Well and
Aeration Well Locations).
11. An outdoor air sample was collected from the Courtyard Area of
Building 2. Analytical results for this sample report TCB at a
concentration that exceeds constituent concentrations for an
industrial scenario published in the EPA Regions Screening Table,
EPA's 2002 vapor intrusion guidance, and New Jersey's vapor
intrusion guidance (a reference document). The occurrence of TCE
in outdoor air does not correlate to known groundwater conditions
in the area of Building 2.
12. As determined by the most recent Environmental Indicator
evaluation (dated 7/7/10), human exposures at the Facility are
reasonably expected to be under control. The CA725 YE event code
was entered into the RCRAInfo database. This status code will
remain in RCRAInfo as long as the NC Hazardous Waste Section
believes it is a true representation of the risk of human
exposures to contaminated media (i.e., soil, groundwater, surface
water, and outdoor air).
13. As determined by the most recent Environmental Indicator
evaluation (dated 7/7/10), the migration of contaminated
groundwater at the Facility is under control. The CA750 YE event
code was entered into the RCRAInfo database. This status code
will remain in RCRAInfo as long as the NC Hazardous Waste Section
believes the migration of contaminated groundwater is under
control.
E. Summary of Regulatory History and Actions
1. The NC Hazardous Waste Branch inspected Fairchild
Industrial Products in 1989 and 1990. Each visit resulted
in the issuing of a Notice of Violation (NOV). In 1989
Fairchild. Industrial was cited for failure to comply with
the rules governing proper waste accumulation and with the
rules for the proper training of Facility personnel. A NOV
for failure to document weekly inspections of hazardous
waste storage area(s), improper hazardous waste storage,
and failure to provide job descriptions for employees
working with hazardous waste resulted from the 1990
inspection.
10

BE Aerospace AOC
2. Prior to a change of ownership, a Phase I Environmental
Assessment was performed in 1994 that identified several
areas of soil and groundwater contamination. Constituent
concentrations in groundwater exceeded 15 NCAC 2L
Groundwater Standards. As a result, a NOV was issued by
the NC Division of Water Quality on December 20, 1996.
3. To address the requirements of the NOV, BE Aerospace
completed a Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) in 1997
that identified several sources of soil and groundwater
contamination. Several areas of the facility where wastes
were managed and potentially released to the environment
were also identified.
4. In September 1999, an Administrative Order on Consent -
Docket #99-126 was signed between BE Aerospace and the NC
Division of Waste Management (Attachment D: AOC Docket
#99-126 (the "1999 AOC")). The 1999 AOC directed the
Facility to comply with the groundwater investigation and
monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR 265.90 through
265.94 of the NC Hazardous Waste Management Rules, submit
closure and post closure plans for SWMU 5-Former Hazardous
Waste Storage Area (a RCRA regulated unit), provide
financial assurance for the closure and post closure care
of SWMU 5, and implement a corrective action program at the
Facility. The corrective action program required BE
Aerospace to submit a remediation plan upon completion of
site assessment.
5. In response to the 1999 AOC, BE Aerospace submitted a
Comprehensive Site Assessment Addendum (CSAA) report in
July 2000. The CSAA report presented the results of
additional characterization and delineation of areas
identified in previous assessments.
6. The submittal of a site remediation plan was a requirement
of the 1999 AOC, and BE Aerospace submitted a Remedial
Action Plan in 2003 (the "Remedial Action Plan"). As
proposed in the plan, BE Aerospace conducted soil
excavation activities and installed SVE systems.
Approximately 180 tons of soil contaminated with PCE and
oil and grease was removed. After soil excavation, BE
Aerospace initiated in -situ remediation (i.e., soil vapor
extraction) to treat VOC-contaminated soil located in
inaccessible areas. Pump and treat and enhanced
bioremediation of contaminated groundwater were also
proposed in the plan.
7. BE Aerospace submitted a Closure Plan/Closure Report (2005)
to address the closure status of SWMU 1-Former Fairchild
Storage Shed, SWMU 4-Courtyard Area, SWMU 5-Former
Hazardous Waste Storage Area, and SWMU 6-Western Storm
Water Outfall. The report provided historical information
and future plans for remediation and monitoring activities
at these four SWMUs.

BE Aerospace AOC
8. A Visual Site Inspection/Site Reconnaissance (VSI/SR) was
conducted at the Facility in February 2007. The VSI/SR gathered
site information about SWMUs and Areas of Concern (AOCs) , which
was presented in a report titled Data Gap Assessment for BE
Aerospace, Inc. (2007). The SWMUs and AOCs listed below were
discussed in the report.
SOW Number
DesCri
SWMU 1
Former Fairchild Storage Shed and Eastern
Boundary Drainage Swale
SWMU 2
Virgin Oil Storage Area
SWMU 3
Air Compressor Area
SWMU 4
Courtyard Area
SWMU 5
Former Hazardous Waste Storage Area
SWMU 6
Western Storm Water Outfall
SWMU 7
Drum Storage Building/Quonset Hut
SWMU 8
Metal Scrap Area
SWMU 9
Secondary Oil Storage Area
SWMU 10
Machine Coolant Filtration Area
SWMU 11
General Parts Washer
SWMU 12
Small Parts Washing and Finishing Area
SWMU 13
Large Parts Cleaning and Surface Finishing Area
SWMU 14
Aerosol Can Crusher
SWMU 15
Temporary Hazardous Waste Storage Roll -off
Container
SWMU 16
Satellite Accumulation Areas
SWMU 17
New Hazardous Waste Storage Area
SWMU 18
Wastewater Treatment Unit
SWMU 19
Used Oil Storage Area
SWMU 20
Municipal Solid Waste Roll -off Container
AOC 1
Methyl Chloride Spill Area
ADC 2
Bowen Creek
12

BE Aerospace AOC
9. SWMU 5-Former Hazardous Waste Storage Area, a RCRA
regulated unit, was closed in accordance with an approved
closure plan in 2008. A post closure plan for this unit,
which addressed cap maintenance, groundwater monitoring and
financial assurance for post closure care, was approved in
December 2009.
13

BE Aerospace AOC
IV. Conclusions of Law and Determinations
Based upon the foregoing stipulations of fact and all other information
available on the effective date of this Order, the Section concludes and
determines that:
A. Definitions
1. "Hazardous wastes" shall mean those hazardous wastes defined in
N.C.G.S. § 130A-290(a)(8) and 40 CFR Part 261, adopted by
reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0106(a) through .0106(e).
2. "Hazardous constituents" shall mean those constituents listed in
Appendix VIII to 40 CFR Part 261, adopted by reference in 15A
NCAC 13A .0106(e), or any constituent identified in Appendix IX
to 40 CFR Part 264, adopted by reference in 15A NCAC 13A
.0109(a), or under N.C.G.S. 130A-294.
3. "Landfill" shall have the meaning given in N.C.G.S. 130A-
290 (a) (16) .
4. The term "Facility" shall have the meaning given in 40 CFR
260.10, adopted by reference in 15A NCAC .0102(b).
5. The terms "disposal" and "treatment" shall have the meanings
given in N.C.G.S. 130A-290(a)(6) and (a)(42), respectively.
6. The term "Facility boundary," as used in this order, is the
furthermost extent of the property owned by Three Aircraft Seats,
L.P. and currently used by BE Aerospace, Inc. The boundary of
the Facility is shown on maps in Attachments A and C.
7. The term "active portion" shall have the meaning given in 40 CFR
260.10, adopted by reference in 15A NCAC .0102(b).
8. The term "Corrective Action" shall mean all activities, including
activities conducted beyond the Facility boundary, that are
proposed or implemented to facilitate assessment, monitoring, and
active or passive remediation of releases of hazardous waste or
hazardous constituents to soil, groundwater, surface water, or
the atmosphere associated with Hazardous Waste Management Units
(HWMUs), Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs), and/or Areas of
Concern (ADCs) located at the Facility.
B. Status of BE Aerospace, Inc.
1. BE Aerospace, Incorporated is a person as defined in N.C.G.S.
130A-290(a)(22).
2. BE Aerospace, Inc. is an operator as defined in N.C.G.S. 130A-
290(a)(21). BE Aerospace, Inc. is listed as the operator on the
most recent Part A permit application, dated May 6, 2010.
3. Three Aircraft Seats (DE), L.P. is a person as defined in
N.C.G.S. 130A-290(a)(22).
14

BE Aerospace AOC
4. Three Aircraft Seats, L.P. is an owner as defined in N.C.G.S.
130A-290(a)(21). Three Aircraft Seats, L.P. is listed as the
owner on the most recent Part A permit application, dated May 6,
2010.
C. Application of RCRA Standards
1. Pursuant to 40 CFR 265.1(b), the standards of 40 CFR Part
265 apply to owners and operators of facilities where
disposal of hazardous waste has occurred and where the
owners and operators have complied with most of the
requirements for interim status under Section 3005(e) of
RCRA and 40 CFR 270.10 until either a permit is issued
under Section 3005 of RCRA or until applicable Part 265
closure and post -closure responsibilities are fulfilled.
The standards of 40 CFR Part 265 also apply to owners and
operators of facilities in existence on November 19, 1980,
where disposal of hazardous waste has occurred, who have
failed to provide timely notification as required by
Section 3010(a) of RCRA and/or failed to file Part A of the
permit application as required by 40 CFR 270.10(e) and (g).
As stipulated above, the Site was in existence on November
19, 1980 and managed hazardous waste at the site after
1980. Due to the residual concentrations of PCE and other
volatile organic compounds at concentrations above toxicity
standards, disposal of toxicity characteristic hazardous
waste occurred at the Site; therefore, the provisions of
the Act and regulations apply to owners and operators of
the Site.
2. SWMU 5-Former Hazardous Waste Storage Area is a regulated unit.
Since soil contaminated with tetrachloroethene (PCE) was left in
place at the SWMU, the unit was closed as a landfill and capped
in accordance with 40 CFR 264.300 - 264.351 (as incorporated by
reference in 15 NCAC 13A .0109). The unit was closed in
accordance with an approved closure plan in 2008.
3. At final closure of a landfill, the owner or operator is
required to comply with the provisions of 40 CFR
265.310(a), as incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A
.0110(n), for closure and to comply with the provisions of
40 CFR 265.310(b), as incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC
13A .0110(n), for post -closure throughout the post -closure
care period. A post closure plan for SWMU 5-Former
Hazardous Waste Storage Area was approved by the NC
Hazardous Waste Section in 2009.
4. Based on the foregoing and pursuant to 40 CFR 270.1(c),
adopted by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0113(a), BE Aerospace
is required to have a post -closure permit or an enforceable
document in lieu of a post -closure permit for SWMU 5-Former
Hazardous Waste Storage Area.
S. As substantiated in the reports submitted by BE Aerospace,
the Division has determined that a Regulated Unit,
identified as SWMU 5-Former Hazardous Waste Storage Area,
15

BE Aerospace AOC
is situated among one or more SWMUs, identified as SWMU 4-
Coutyard Yard Area and SWMU 1-Former Fairchild Storage
Shed. Since releases to groundwater from SWMU 5 are
commingled with releases from SWMU 4 and SWMU 1, the
regulated unit is eligible to be remediated under the
corrective action requirements of 40 CFR 264.101, adopted
by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0109, as opposed to the
requirements of 40 CFR 264.91 through 264.100, as provided
for in 40 CFR 264.90(f), adopted by reference in 15A NCAC
13A .0109.
6. Pursuant to 40 CFR 265.121, incorporated by reference in
15A NCAC 13A. 0110(g), owners and operators who are subject
to the requirement to obtain a post -closure permit under 40
CFR 270.1(c), incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A
.0113(a), but who obtain enforceable documents in lieu of a
post -closure permit, as provided under 40 CFR 270.1(c)(7),
incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A. 0113(a), must
comply with the requirements to submit information about
the Facility in 40 CFR 270.28, incorporated by reference in
15A NCAC 13A. 0113(b), and with the requirements for
facility -wide corrective action in 40 CFR 264.101,
incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A. 0109(g).
7. The Section has determined that, as much as can be determined
given the Parties' present understanding of the Facility and the
existing contamination, BE Aerospace's compliance with the
provisions of this Order related to groundwater monitoring and
corrective action for releases to groundwater shall protect human
health and the environment, as required by 40 CFR 264.90(f),
incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0109(g). The Parties
agree that additional monitoring and corrective action may be
required as a result of the additional characterization that
shall be completed pursuant to this order. Subject to Paragraph
XIII of this Order (Dispute Resolution), the Parties agree to
conduct additional monitoring and corrective action to the extent
that the Section determines it is necessary based on the results.
of such additional characterization.
S. Based on the request and representations of BE Aerospace, this
Order is being issued at the discretion of the Chief of the
Hazardous Waste Section in lieu of a post -closure permit,
pursuant to N.C.G.S. Chapter 130A, Article 9; 40 CFR 270.1(c)(7),
incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0113(a); 40 CFR
265.121, incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0110(g); and
all applicable portions of 40 CFR Parts 124, 264, 265, and 270,
incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0105, .0109, .0110,
and .0113.
D. Integration of Order
1. BE Aerospace, Inc. agrees to complete all of the activities
required in the Facility's Post -Closure Plan, which was approved
pursuant to the 1999 AOC in correspondence dated December 4,
2009. Unless specifically superseded by the terms of this Order,
the requirements specified in the post closure plan and any
16

BE Aerospace AOC
current Division approved work orders remain in effect. With
these specified, limited exceptions, this Order supersedes any
other agreement, verbal or written, between the Parties that may
have been entered into prior to the date of execution of this
Order.
2. If any conflict exists between the specified methods of
completing work pursuant to the documents referenced in Paragraph
III.D.1. and this Order, the terms of this Order shall control.
E. Acceptance of Previous Work
1. The Section acknowledges that BE Aerospace may have completed
some of the tasks required by this Order and that some of the
information and data required by this Order may be available.
This previous work may be used to meet the requirements of this
Order.
2. All corrective action activities conducted pursuant to the 1999
ADC will be recognized by the NC Hazardous Waste Section as
appropriate, but not necessarily sufficient, in the development
and implementation of any further activities under this order.
F. Responsibility Issues
1. BE Aerospace, Inc. accepts full responsibility for satisfactory
completion of all required tasks and activities in accordance
with the terms and conditions of this Order and, subject to its
dispute resolution and other legal rights, accepts further
direction of the Section to achieve satisfactory completion of
the Corrective Action required by this order. Nothing herein
prohibits BE Aerospace and Three Aircraft Seats, L.P. from
working together to meet the requirements of this Order.
17

BE Aerospace AOC
V. Scope of Work
A. BE Aerospace shall complete the characterization activities, monitoring,
and corrective action measures at the Facility as described herein. In
conducting any such work, BE Aerospace shall prepare appropriate
workplans and reports for Section approval.
B. All actions required pursuant.to this Order shall be in accordance with
applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations. BE Aerospace
shall undertake corrective action activities in accordance with the
Resource Conservation and recovery Act, the State Hazardous Waste
Management Rules, and EPA and Department guidelines as appropriate and
applicable at the time the work is undertaken.
C. If documents submitted to the Section include any work that would
constitute the practice of engineering as defined by N.C.G.S. Chapter
89C, the signature and seal of a professional engineer is required. If
documents submitted include any work that would constitute the practice
of geology as defined by N.C.G.S. Chapter 89E, the signature and seal of
a licensed geologist is required. If any work is to be done on a well
that would constitute well contractor activities as defined in N.C.G.S.
Chapter 87, a certified well contractor shall be employed to perform the
work.
D. Any standard, requirement, criteria, or limitation under an
environmental law or facility siting law promulgated by North Carolina
that is more stringent than any federal standard, requirement, criteria,
or limitation with respect to any hazardous waste or constituent is
applicable to the work to be done at this Facility; e.g., the
groundwater standards set forth in 15A NCAC Subchapter 2L shall apply to
releases at the Facility and beyond the Facility boundary.
E. Conceptual Site Model (CSM)
1. A Conceptual Site Model (CSM) serves as the foundation for
Facility characterization and remediation decision -making. The
documents listed in Paragraph III.D.1. are the basis for the CSM.
Relevant portions of these documents should be integrated under a
single cover into a current CSM. The CSM shall contain, at a
minimum, the following:
a. the geologic/hydrogeologic conditions at the Facility;
b. the sources, types, and distribution of contaminants and
any breakdown products;
C. a holistic overview of the sources contamination,
including known or potential pathways of migration, and
known or potential receptors;
d. the actual extent of migration beyond the Facility
boundary;
e. possible environmental and human health risks.
18

BE Aerospace AOC
The CSM(s) may include maps, cross -sections, flaw nets,
narrative, data tables, groundwater flow models, contaminant
transport models, and any other information needed to gain a full
understanding of the Facility.
2. BE Aerospace shall submit an updated CSM within ninety (90)
calendar days after the issuance of this Order. BE Aerospace shall
also submit a modified or updated CSM when the Parties to this
Order determine there is a need for a new CSM. Submissions of
updated CSMs shall occur pursuant to this Paragraph until the
Section determines (a) that Corrective Action at the facility is
completed or (b) that further updates of the CSM are no longer
necessary. After review of the updated CSM, the Section shall
notify BE Aerospace in writing that the CSM has been approved or
that there are material deficiencies in the CSM. After receiving
written notification from the Section of any material deficiencies
in the CSM, BE Aerospace shall submit to the Section, within a
mutually agreed to time period, information or material sufficient
to correct such deficiencies.
3. The CSM shall be an adaptable model of the Facility that is used to
develop hypotheses regarding the location and movement of
contamination at the Facility and the potential impacts that may
occur to human health and the environment. BE Aerospace shall use
EPA and Division guidance documents appropriate and applicable at
the time the work is undertaken in developing any updated CSM.
4. Using the CSM as a guide, BE Aerospace shall conduct such further
Facility investigations and assessments that the Section determines
necessary for the development and implementation of a Facility -wide
Corrective Action Plan as described below. The CSM shall guide
Corrective Actions taken pursuant to this order.
F. Additional Facility Corrective Actions
Although a significant amount of Corrective Action previously has been
performed at the BE Aerospace Facility pursuant to the 1999 ADC, BE
Aerospace shall pursuant to this Order conduct such additional
characterization and evaluate as is reasonably necessary to verify site
conditions and the efficacy of remedial actions previously undertaken.
At a minimum, BE Aerospace shall complete the following activities:
1. Confirm that the horizontal extent of contaminated groundwater in
the shallow aquifer, as such extent has been delineated in
Monitoring Reports previously submitted to the Section, is
accurate. As necessary for this purpose, BE Aerospace will
collect data designed to verify and define the limits of the
shallow PCE groundwater plume west of the Facility boundary and
south of Fairchild Road.
2. Conduct and report on a literature search designed to determine
whether geologic maps, reports, or other technical documents that
identify or characterize faults and/or fracture sets that exist
in the vicinity of the BE Aerospace Facility. This report should
include a resubmission of any fracture trace analysis performed
19

BE Aerospace AOC
G.
previously. If data gaps are identified, BE Aerospace may expand
on existing fracture trace analyses or conduct new fracture trace
analyses.
3. Determine whether the relatively high concentration of PCE in
groundwater exhibited by deep saprolite monitoring wells MW-14D
and MW-21D is also present in the deep saprolite at locations
between Fairchild Road and Bowen Creek.
4. Report on the effectiveness of the Remedial Action Plan as part
of the Facility Monitoring Plan. The Facility shall determine
the parameters that will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of
remediation and collect the necessary data. Plans for collecting
the data needed to establish the effectiveness of remediation
systems should be submitted as part of the Facility Monitoring
Report in accordance with Paragraphs V.G. and V.I.
5. Determine the potential for vapor intrusion from contaminated
media to indoor air in occupied buildings at the Facility. The
potential risks of a complete indoor air exposure pathway should
be defined for on -site and off -site buildings.
6. Sample Bowen Creek at locations where contaminated groundwater
originating at the Facility discharges to surface water, if the
additional investigations required by this Order, including the
characterization of fractured bedrock, identifies discharge zones
that have not been previously documented and sampled.
Facility Characterization Workplan/Quarterly Progress Reports
1. Following completion of the characterization and evaluation
activities set forth in Paragraph V.F., the Section may determine
that additional Facility characterization is warranted. Within
ninety (90) calendar days after receiving written notification
from the Section that the Section has determined that additional
characterization is warranted, BE Aerospace shall submit a
Facility Characterization Workplan that is based upon the CSM and
that outlines the activities that shall be undertaken to respond
to such a determination. The Facility Characterization Workplan
shall include a schedule of implementation. The schedule of
implementation shall include the submission of quarterly progress
reports to the section in accordance with Paragraph V.G.4.
2. The Section will either accept or provide comments on the
proposed Facility Characterization Workplan. Within thirty (30)
calendar days of receiving notice from the Section of any
deficiency in the Facility Characterization Workplan, BE
Aerospace shall submit to the Section information or material
sufficient to correct such deficiency. BE Aerospace shall
implement the Facility Characterization Workplan within ninety
(90) calendar days of receiving the Section's approval of the
workplan.
20

BE Aerospace AOC
3. If the Section determines that additional work is required to
complete the Facility Characterization after the completion of
the work outlined in the Facility Characterization Workplan, then
BE Aerospace shall perform those additional tasks according to a
schedule mutually agreed upon by the Parties. Such work shall
also conform to the requirements of this order.
4. BE Aerospace shall submit quarterly reports on the progress of
the Facility Characterization. These reports shall include:
a.
A description of the portion of the
Facility
Characterization completed;
b.
Summaries of findings;
c.
Summaries of any significant deviations from the
approved
Facility Characterization Workplan(s) during the
reporting
period;
d.
Summaries of any significant contacts with local
community
public interest groups or state government;
e.
Summaries of any problems or potential
problems
encountered during the reporting period;
f.
Actions taken to rectify problems;
g.
Changes to relevant personnel;
h.
Projected work for the next reporting period; and
i.
Copies of laboratory/monitoring data including QA/QC data.
H. Facility Characterization Reports
1. BE Aerospace shall prepare and submit to the Section Draft and
Final Facility Characterization Reports for the investigations
conducted pursuant to the Facility characterization Workplan. BE
Aerospace shall submit the Draft Facility Characterization
Reports to the Section for review in accordance with the schedule
in the approved Facility Characterization Workplan(s). BE
Aerospace shall submit the Final Facility Characterization Report
to the Section according to the schedule set out in the Section's
written comments on the Draft Facility Characterization Report.
Any Draft and Final Facility Characterization Reports shall
include an analysis and summary of all required investigations of
the HWMU, SWMUs and AOCs and the investigation results. The
summary shall describe the type and extent of contamination at
the Facility, including sources and migration pathways, and a
description of actual or potential receptors. The Facility
Characterization Reports shall also describe the extent of
contamination in relation to background levels indicative of the
area.
2. The Section shall review the Final Facility characterization
Report and notify BE Aerospace of the need for further
investigative action and/or the need for a remediation program in
accordance with 40 CPR 264.101, incorporated by reference in 15A
NCAC 13A .0109(g). BE Aerospace shall prepare and implement any
further investigative action required by the Section according to
a schedule approved by the Section.
21

BE Aerospace AOC
I. Facility Monitoring Plan
1. BE Aerospace shall continue to implement the existing groundwater
monitoring program to monitor groundwater concentrations at the
Facility and as described in the revised Groundwater Sampling
and Analysis Plan (2006), which shall be considered the
Facility Monitoring Plan until such time either as the
Section determines remediation is complete or the Section
or BE Aerospace determine that the Facility Monitoring Plan
needs to be modified. Any request to modify the existing
groundwater monitoring program shall be made, approved, and
implemented pursuant to Paragraphs V.I.3 through V.I.5.
2. Within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving the Section's
determination that the Facility Monitoring Plan needs to be
modified, BE Aerospace shall develop and submit to the Section a
revised Facility Monitoring Plan to evaluate the effectiveness of
Corrective Action at the Facility. Sixty (60) calendar days
after receiving written approval of the Facility Monitoring Plan
from the Section, BE Aerospace shall implement the Facility
Monitoring Plan.
3. If the Section determines that the Facility Monitoring Plan is
deficient, then the Section shall notify BE Aerospace in writing.
Within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving written
notification from the Section, BE Aerospace shall submit an
amended Facility Monitoring Plan.
4. If BE Aerospace seeks to modify the Facility Monitoring plan,
then BE Aerospace shall submit to the Section a written
explanation of the proposed modification. The proposed
modification shall include an updated CSM to the extent necessary
to explain the proposal.
5. The Section will approve, disapprove, or provide comments on any
proposed modification to the Facility Monitoring Plan. Within
thirty (30) calendar days of receiving notice from the Section of
any deficiency in a proposed modification to the Facility
Monitoring Plan, BE Aerospace shall submit to the Section
information or material sufficient to correct such deficiency (or
may withdraw the proposal). BE Aerospace shall implement the
modified Facility Monitoring Plan within ninety (90) calendar
days of receiving written approval from the Section.
J. Interim Measures
1. If the Section determines that there is a need to implement
interim remedial measures at the Facility in order to abate
conditions that may pose an imminent hazard to human health or
the environment pending implementation of long-term corrective
action, then BE Aerospace shall prepare an Interim Measures
Workplan (IM Workplan) and take any other appropriate measures as
authorized and directed by the Section.
22

BE Aerospace AOC
2. The IM Workplan shall ensure that the proposed Interim Measures
are designed to mitigate any current or potential threat(s) to
human health or the environment and to be consistent with and
integrated into any long-term Corrective Action Plan at the
Facility. The IM Workplan shall include a discussion of: (a) the
objectives of the Interim Measures program; (b) the required
Facility procedures for the implementation of any modification to
the existing interim remedial measure or additional Interim
Measures (including any designs, plans, or specifications); and
(c) the schedule for the implementation of the modification to or
addition of Interim Measures.
3. The IM Workplan shall be approved by the Section in writing prior
to its implementation. If the Section disapproves the IM
Workplan, the Section shall either (a) notify BE Aerospace in
writing of the IM Workplan's deficiencies and specify a due date
for the submission of a revised IM Workplan; (b) revise the IM
Workplan and notify BE Aerospace of the revisions and the start
date of the schedule within the approved IM Workplan; or (c)
conditionally approve the IM Workplan and notify BE Aerospace of
the conditions upon which the Ili! Workplan is to be implemented.
BE Aerospace shall implement any required modification to or
addition of Interim Measures in accordance with the Section's
directions.
4. BE Aerospace shall give notice to the Section as soon as possible
of any proposed changes to an approved IM Workplan. Such
modifications shall be implemented only with the Section's
approval and shall conform to the requirements of this order.
5. If the time required for the completion of any modification to or
addition of Interim Measure is more than one (1) year, BE
Aerospace shall provide the Section with progress reports at
intervals specified in the approved IM Workplan. The progress
reports shall contain the following information at a minimum. -
(a) a description of the portion of the Interim Measures
completed; (b) summaries of any deviations from the IM Workplan
during the reporting period; (c) simmiaries of any problems or
potential problems encountered during the interim period; (d)
projected work for the next reporting period; and (e) copies of
all laboratory/monitoring data generated during the reporting
period.
6. BE Aerospace shall prepare and submit a final Interim Measures
Report (IM Report) to the Section within ninety (90) calendar
days of the completion of any Interim Measure. The IM Report
shall contain the following information at a minimum: (a) a
description of the Interim Measures that were implemented; (b)
summaries of the results of such Interim Measures; (c) summaries
of any problems encountered; (d) summaries of the accomplishments
and effectiveness of the Interim Measures; and (e) copies of all
relevant laboratory/monitoring data.
23

BE Aerospace AOC
K. Corrective Action Strategy
1. BE Aerospace shall at all times provide a Corrective Action
Strategy that sets out a plan for developing and evaluating
remedies for the impacted areas at the Facility and beyond the
Facility boundary after considering: (a) the CSM; (b)
contaminants of concern; (c) the nature and extent of
contamination; (d) the rate of contaminant movement; (e) the
amount of time required to remediate the Facility; (f) media and
receptors impacted; and (g) other relevant information gathered
as part of the Facility Characterization Report.
2. The current Corrective Action Strategy for the Facility is
incorporated in the Remedial Action Plan (2003). This existing
Corrective Action Strategy shall remain the Corrective Action
Strategy for the Facility unless a Facility Characterization
Report is prepared and submitted pursuant to Paragraph V.H. of
this Order, or unless the existing Corrective Action Strategy is
updated in accordance with Paragraph V.K.3. An updated
Corrective Action Strategy shall be submitted to the Section
within ninety (90) calendar days of receiving the Section's
written approval of the Facility Characterization Report.
3. BE Aerospace shall update the Corrective Action Strategy upon
written request from the Section and at any other time BE
Aerospace deems appropriate. Within sixty (60) calendar days of
receiving written notice from the Section of any deficiency in
the Corrective Action Strategy, BE Aerospace shall submit to the
Section information or material sufficient to correct such
deficiency. When the Section determines that the Corrective
Action Strategy has been amended appropriately, then the Section
shall notify BE Aerospace in writing of its approval.
4. The Corrective Action Strategy shall be designed to meet the
Section's remedial goals for the Facility. The Section's
remedial goals for the Facility include protection of all
receptors as well as attempting to achieve unrestricted use for
the soil and groundwater, as required for groundwater by the
standards in 15A NCAC Subchapter 2L. If BE Aerospace determines
that alternate cleanup levels would be protective of human health
and the environment, then such alternate levels shall be
submitted to the Section for evaluation.
L. Corrective Action Plan
1. The Remedial Action Plan is the current Corrective Action Plan at
the Facility. BE Aerospace shall continue to implement the
current Corrective Action Plan until an updated Corrective Action
Strategy is developed and approved pursuant to Paragraph V.K and
an updated Corrective Action Plan is approved and implemented
pursuant to this Paragraph V.L.
2. BE Aerospace shall submit a revised Corrective Action Plan for
the Section's review if the Corrective Action Strategy is revised
or updated pursuant to Paragraph V.K. The revised Corrective
Action Plan shall include a summary of remedial options
24

BE Aerospace AOC
considered, an implementation schedule for the selected remedial
actions, a method of evaluating the effectiveness of the
Corrective Action Plan, a method of determining when corrective
action is complete, and an estimate of the required duration of
the Corrective Action Plan to meet the remedial goals.
3. Sixty (60) calendar days after receiving the Section's written
approval of a revised or updated Corrective Action Strategy, BE
Aerospace shall submit to the Section a Corrective Action Plan
designed to implement the Corrective Action Strategy. The
Corrective Action' Plan shall be based upon the information
developed in the Corrective Action Strategy. The Corrective
Action Plan shall at all times be technically consistent to the
extent practicable with appropriate and applicable EPA and
Division guidance on the design and implementation of remediation
technologies.
4. within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving the Section's
written approval of the Corrective Action Plan, BE Aerospace
shall provide the Section with all information necessary for the
Section to commence the public participation process as specified
in Paragraphs XI.A.-XI.E. Upon completion of the public
participation process, the Section shall approve, approve with
modification, or disapprove the Corrective Action Plan.
5. within ninety (90) calendar days after receiving written approval
of the Corrective Action Plan, BE Aerospace shall begin
implementation of the activities set forth in the Corrective
Action Plan. These activities shall not be deemed complete
pursuant to Paragraphs XIV.A. through XIV.C, of this Order until
the remedial goals have been met.
6. If the approved Corrective Action Plan for the Facility includes
institutional controls that are in the form of recorded
encumbrances on the Facility, BE Aerospace agrees to inaugurate
such institutional controls during the period it owns the
Facility or, in the alternative, to notify any successor in title
to the Facility of its obligation to inaugurate such
institutional controls. Any person who obtains an interest in any
portion of the Facility prior to the inauguration of such
institutional controls shall be given notice of this Order, and
the information contained in this Paragraph V.L.6 shall be
included in the deed or other instrument creating such interest,
and the instrument shall be recorded with the Forsyth County
Register of Deeds.
25

BE Aerospace AOC
VI. Data Quality Assurance and Quality Control
A. Workplans shall contain quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) and
chain of custody procedures for all sampling, monitoring, and
analytical activities. BE Aerospace shall document in the applicable
report any deviations from the QA/QC and chain of custody procedures in
approved workplans, including reasons for the deviations.
B. To ensure that data of known and appropriate quality are obtained and
are sufficient to support their intended use(s), BE Aerospace shall
submit workplans and reports to the Section that include data quality
objectives for each collection activity.
26

BE Aerospace AOC
VII. Property Access and Sampling Access
A. BE Aerospace shall assure that the Section and its representatives,
including contractors, have access at all reasonable times to the
Facility and to any other property where access is necessary to ensure
performance of the activities reyaired by this Order.
B. To assure access to property beyond the Facility boundary, BE Aerospace
shall use their best efforts to obtain access agreements from the
owners of such property. As used in this Order, "best efforts"
includes the payment of reasonable sums of money in consideration of
access.
C. In the event that the access agreements required by Paragraph VII.B.
cannot be obtained by BE Aerospace despite the use of best efforts, BE
Aerospace shall notify the Section and provide documentation regarding
its efforts to obtain such agreements. If necessary, the Section may
exercise its legal authority to assist BE Aerospace in obtaining access
to properties beyond the Facility boundary. In the event that the
Section exercises its authority to obtain access for the performance of
any act required by this Order, BE Aerospace shall reimburse the
Section for the reasonable amount of costs incurred in the exercise of
such powers, including attorney's fees.
D. The Section or its representatives may take split or duplicate samples
of any samples collected by BE Aerospace, or any authorized
representative of BE Aerospace, pursuant to this Order. BE Aerospace
or its authorized representatives shall notify the Section orally no
less than ten (10) working days in advance of any field activities
occurring pursuant to this Order. A single notice shall suffice for a
sequence of sampling events occurring over consecutive days.
E. BE Aerospace shall allow the Section or its representatives to enter
the Facility at reasonable times, upon notice to BE Aerospace, to
review the progress of activities required by this order, to conduct
such tests as the Section deems necessary in connection with this
Order, and to otherwise assess BE Aerospace's compliance with this
Order.
F. All persons with access to the Facility pursuant to this Order shall
comply with Facility -specific health and safety plans and any
applicable Facility security procedures.
G. BE Aerospace shall comply with the security requirements specified in
40 CFR 264.14, incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0109 (c) , and
consequently prevent or minimize the unknown or unauthorized entry of
people, pets, or livestock onto the active portions of the Facility.
H. Nothing in this order shall limit any access rights the Section may
have pursuant to law.
27

BE Aerospace AOC
VIII. Data Collection/Document Availability/Reporting Requirements
A. BE Aerospace shall, upon request, furnish the Section with copies of
records required by this Order, including copies of daily reports,
inspection reports, and laboratory/monitoring data.
B. All data, factual information, and documents submitted by BE Aerospace
pursuant to this Order shall be subject to public inspection. BE
Aerospace shall not assert any confidentiality or privilege claim
concerning any data gathered during any investigations or other actions
required by this Order, including any hydrogeologic or chemical data,
any data submitted in support of a remedial proposal, or any other
scientific or engineering data especially as regards an Interim Measure
or Corrective Action Plan. Except as specifically prohibited by this
Paragraph, BE Aerospace may assert a claim of confidentiality as to any
process, method, technique, or any description thereof that BE
Aerospace claims constitutes proprietary or trade secret information.
Except as specifically prohibited by this Paragraph, BE Aerospace may
assert business confidentiality claims, if applicable, at the time
information is submitted for information provided in connection with
this Order in accordance with 40 CFR 2.203(b), adopted by reference in
15A NCAC 13A .0104(c), Chapter 132 of the North Carolina General
Statutes, N.C.G.S. 130A-304, or any other applicable State law. Any
claim for confidentiality submitted pursuant to this Paragraph shall be
subject to North Carolina's confidentiality determination procedures
and, if determined to be confidential, afforded protection by the
Section as provided by North Carolina law.
C. Documents that are asserted to be attorney work product or subject to
privilege under law shall not be subject to inspection or copying under
this Order. BE Aerospace shall provide the Section with (1) a
description of each document for which a privilege is asserted; and (2)
an explanation as to why the privilege is applicable to the document or
portions thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing provision, the Section
may seek disclose of such documents through a court of competent
jurisdiction.
D. BE Aerospace shall notify the Section in writing as soon as possible,
and no later than fifteen (15) working days after BE Aerospace obtains
knowledge, of any planned physical alterations or additions which may
materially impact the HWKJ, SWMUs, AOCs, or areas contaminated by
releases from these units.
E. BE Aerospace shall report to the Section situations regarding hazardous
waste or hazardous constituents that endanger, or have the potential to
endanger, human health or the environment. These situations include,
but may not be limited to, the management, investigation, or
remediation of contaminated media (i.e., soil, sediment, bedrock,
surface water, groundwater, and air). The reports shall be
communicated orally within 24 hours and submitted in writing within
five (5) working days of when BE Aerospace becomes aware that the
situation exists. Depending upon the circumstances, the Section may
waive the five-day requirement and allow BE Aerospace to submit the
written report within fifteen (15) working days.
28

BE Aerospace AOC
F. BE Aerospace shall submit a biennial report to the Section by March 1
of each even numbered year as required by 40 CFR 264.75, incorporated
by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0109(f). The biennial report shall be
submitted on EPA Form 8700-13 .A/6. The report shall cover activities
required by this Order during the previous calendar year. The
certification submitted with the biennial report shall be signed by an
authorized corporate officer of BE Aerospace.
G. BE Aerospace shall preserve, for at least three (3) years after the
termination of this Order, all records and documents in their
possession that relate in any way to this Order. For any hazardous
waste generated, BE Aerospace shall retain a copy of all notices,
certifications, demonstrations, waste analysis data, and other
documentation for at least five (5) years from the date the last waste
was treated, stored, or disposed (either at the Facility or beyond the
Facility) or until the Sect:icn determines corrective action is
completed, whichever date is later.
H. Notification and data collection/assessment requirements for newly
identified SWMUs and ADCs.
1. During the effective period of this Order, BE Aerospace shall
notify the Section in writing, within fifteen (15) calendar days
of discovery, of any newly identified SWMU or ADC. The
notification shall include, at a minimum, the location of the
SWMU or AOC and all available information pertaining to the
nature of the release (e.g., media affected, hazardous
constituents released, and magnitude of release). Nothing in
this Section shall be construed as requiring BE Aerospace to
actively search for new SWMUs or ADCs.
2. BE Aerospace shall prepare and submit to the Section, within
ninety (90) calendar days of any notification provided
pursuant to Paragraph VIII.H.1., a SWMU Assessment Report
(SAR) for each newly identified SWMU or AOC. At a minimum,
the SAR shall provide the following information:
a. Location of unit on a topographic map of appropriate scale
such as required ursder 40 CFR 270.14 (b) (19) , incorporated
by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0113(b).
b. Designation of type and function of unit.
c. General dimensions, capacities, and structural description
of the unit (including any available plans/drawings).
d. Known dates that the unit operated.
e. Specification of all wastes that have been managed at/in
the unit to the extent available, including any available
data on hazardous constituents in the waste.
f. All available information pertaining to any release of
hazardous waste or hazardous constituents from such unit
(to include groundwater data, soil analyses, air, and/or
surface water data).
3. Based on the data in the SAR, the Section shall determine the
need for further investigations at the newly identified SWMU or
AOC. If the Section determines that further investigations are
needed, the Section shall require BE Aerospace to develop a plan
29

BE Aerospace AOC
for such investigations and to obtain Section approval before
implementing the plan.
I. Notification requirements and data collection/assessment for newly
discovered releases at previously identified SWMUs and AOCs.
1. During the effective period of this Order, BE Aerospace shall
notify the Section in writing of any newly discovered release(s) of
hazardous waste or hazardous constituents identified during the
course of ground water monitoring, field investigations,
environmental audits of previously known SWMUs or AOCs, or by other
means, within fifteen (15) calendar days of discovery. This
requirement also applies to newly discovered releases at ]mown
SWMUs and ADCs for which additional investigation was not
previously required. Nothing in this Section shall be construed as
requiring BE Aerospace to conduct additional investigations or
audits of previously known SWMUs or AOCs to identify new releases.
2. If the Section determines that further investigation of the SWMUs
or AOCs is needed, the Section shall require BE Aerospace to
develop a plan for such investigation and to obtain Section
approval before implementing the plan.
30

BE Aerospace AOC
IX. Inspection and Training Requirements
A. Within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days of the effective date of
this Order, BE Aerospace shall submit for Section approval a general
inspection and maintenance schedule for the envirormiental monitoring
and remedial action systems currently in use at the Facility. This
plan shall be consistent with 40 CFR 264.15, incorporated by reference
in 15A NCAC 13A .0109(c), and shall be updated as necessary to include
additional or modified monitoring and remedial action systems required
by this Order.
B. Within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days of the effective date of
this Order, BE Aerospace shall submit for Section approval a personnel
training plan for employees and contractors involved with errvironmental
monitoring and remedial action systems. The plan shall be consistent
with 40 CFR 264.16, incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0109(c).
Training shall include instruction for emergency response, sampling,
and operation and maintenance procedures. The personnel training plan
shall be updated as necessary to incorporate additional or modified
monitoring and remedial action systems required by this order. BE
Aerospace shall maintain copies of training documents and records
according to the requirements of Paragraph VIII.G. of this Order.
31

BE Aerospace AOC
X. Cost Estimate, Financial Assurance, and Adjustments
A. In accordance with 40 CFR 265.121, incorporated by reference in 15A
NCAC 13A .0110(g), BE Aerospace shall comply with the Financial
Assurance requirements listed in 40 CFR 264.100 and 264.101,
incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0109(g), for Facility
Corrective Action as defined in Paragraph IV.A.8,
B. Within one hundred eighty (180) calendar days of issuance of this
Order, BE Aerospace shall submit for Section review and approval a
written cost estimate as described in 40 CFR 264.144, incorporated by
reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0109(i), for the actions required by this
Order. The estimate shall be based upon the Corrective Action Strategy
described in Section V.K. and, if available, the Corrective Action Plan
described in Section V.L.
C. Subsequent cost estimates for the cost of implementing the current or
any revised Corrective Action Plan shall be prepared as described in 40
CFR 264.144(a), incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0109(i).
Additionally, the following requirements shall apply to the cost
estimate.
1. As described in 40 CFR 264.144(b), incorporated by reference in
15A NCAC 13A .0109(i), BE Aerospace shall adjust the cost
estimate annually for inflation. The adjusted cost estimate
shall be provided to the Section sixty (60) calendar days prior
to the anniversary date of the establishment of the financial
assurance mechanism unless using a financial test or corporate
guarantee, in which case the estimate shall be updated thirty
(30) calendar days after the close of the firm's fiscal year.
2. BE Aerospace shall, as described in 40 CFR 264.144(c),
incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0109(1), submit cost
adjustments for modifications to the Corrective Action Plan
described in Paragraph V.L. within thirty (30) calendar days
after receiving written approval of the modification.
D. BE Aerospace shall maintain at the Facility a copy of the latest cost
estimate as described in 40 CFR 264.144(d), incorporated by reference
in 15A NCAC 13A .0109(h).
E. Within sixty (60) calendar days of the approval of the estimate
provided in Paragraph X.B., BE Aerospace shall establish financial
assurance for Corrective Action by use of one or more of the mechanisms
described in 40 CFR 264.145, incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A
.0109(i). The amount of financial assurance to be established for
corrective action shall equal the amount of the written cost estimate
as provided in Paragraphs X.B. and X.C. of this Order or for a lower
amount agreed upon by the Department. Financial assurance established
pursuant to this Paragraph shall be used solely for the purpose of
implementing Corrective Action at the Facility.
F. Financial assurance mechanism(s) established by BE Aerospace to satisfy
the financial requirements for Corrective Action shall be worded as
specified in 40 CFR 264.151, incorporated by reference in 15A NCAC 13A
.0109(i), except that references to regulatory requirements for closure

BE Aerospace AOC
and/or post -closure care shall be replaced with the phrase "closure,
poet -closure care, and/or corrective action."
G. BE Aerospace may change the mechanism(s) used to demonstrate financial
assurance for corrective action required by this Order at any time,
with prior notice to the Section, provided the alternate mechanism(s)
meets the requirements of this Order.
H. BE Aerospace's failure to demonstrate its financial ability to
implement the Corrective Action Plan shall not excuse the company's
independent obligation to perform the activities required by this
Order.
33

BE Aerospace AOC
XI. Public Participation
A. The Section shall publish public notices and hold public hearings at
the following times in accordance with 40 CFR 265.121, incorporated by
reference in 15A NCAC 13A .0110(g):
1. Prior to the issuance of this Order;
2. Upon submittal of a modified proposed Corrective Action Plan
pursuant to Paragraph V.L.; and
3. Upon completion of Corrective Action at the Facility or a portion
of the Facility, but prior to the Section issuing a No Further
Action determination for a portion of the Facility or an
Acknowledgement of Termination pursuant to Paragraph XIV.C. of
this Order.
4. When deemed necessary by the Section, additional public meetings
will be held to address the public's concerns.
B. Consistent with the intent of N.C.G.S. Chapter 150B, at any hearing
required by Paragraph XI.A. of this Order, the Section shall receive
oral and written comments from the public and shall also receive
written comments submitted by BE Aerospace in response to the public
comments. The Section shall consider all these comments in making its
decisions regarding Facility Characterization, Corrective Action, and
completion of Corrective Action for the Facility or a portion of the
Facility.
34

BE Aerospace AOC
XII. Delay in Performance
As soon as BE Aerospace is aware of the potential for delay in achieving the
requirements of this order, the company shall submit to the Section written
documentation stating the reasons for the delay and the efforts made by BE
Aerospace to avoid the delay, as well as a time by which such work can be
completed. The Section shall review the documentation and shall approve the
new schedule if BE Aerospace shows good cause for the potential delay. Good
cause shall include, but is not limited to, extraordinary weather, natural
disasters, and national emergencies. The burden of demonstrating that there
is good cause for the proposed delay rests solely with BE Aerospace.
35

BE Aerospace AOC
XIII. Dispute Resolution
BE Aerospace is entitled to dispute any decision, determination or
directive made or issued by the Section pursuant to this Order. Any
such disputes shall be administered and resolved pursuant to the
procedures set forth in this Paragraph XIII. For any dispute that
relates to an action or requirement that is the subject of a deadline
established pursuant to this Order, the subject deadline shall be
tolled until the dispute is resolved. BE Aerospace's invocation of the
Dispute Resolution provision shall not otherwise excuse noncompliance
with this Order or any requirement established pursuant hereto.
Any dispute that BE Aerospace initiates shall be the subject of
informal negotiations between BE Aerospace and the Section. The period
for informal negotiations shall not exceed ninety (90) calendar days
from the time that the dispute arises, unless this period is modified
by written agreement of the Parties. The dispute shall be considered
to arise when BE Aerospace delivers to the Section a written Notice of
Dispute.
Following the conclusion of the period of informal negotiations, the
Section shall notify BE Aerospace in writing of the Section's position
with respect to the dispute ("Dispute Decision"). Within fourteen (14)
calendar days of receiving the Dispute Decision, BE Aerospace may submit
to the Section a written objection to the Dispute Decision (a "Decision
Objection").
If BE Aerospace submits a Decision Objection, the Section may elect to
(i) rescind the Dispute Decision (in which case the position advanced
by BE Aerospace in the dispute shall prevail), (ii) modify the Dispute
Decision (in which case the position advanced in the modification shall
prevail, unless BE Aerospace exercises its right to dispute the
modification), or (iii) dissolve this Order. Notice of the Section's
election (an "Election Notice") shall be provided to BE Aerospace
within fourteen (14) calendar days of the Section's receipt of the
Decision Objection. Failure by the Section to timely provide an
Election Notice to BE Aerospace will be deemed an election by the
Section to dissolve this Order.
In the event that the Order is dissolved pursuant to the preceding
provisions, the Section shall retain all of its applicable enforcement
rights against BE Aerospace, including calling for submittal of a RCRA
application and financial assurance for a Post -Closure Permit and
Corrective Action for the Facility, and BE Aerospace shall retain all of
its defenses to the Section's exercise of such rights. Further, in the
event of such dissolution, plans, reports, data and other information
or documentation submitted to and approved by the Section pursuant to
this Order prior to the dissolution of the Order shall, barring
relevant and applicable change in law or fact, remain applicable to any
future Corrective Actions performed at the Facility, whether pursuant
to a Post -Closure Permit or otherwise.
36

BE Aerospace AOC
ZIV. Satisfaction of Order
A. When BE Aerospace determines all requirements of this Order have been
completed, it shall (1) give written notice to the Section indicating
the work required by the Order has been completed; and (2) file a
petition to terminate the Order. BE Aerospace may also petition the
Section to issue a No Further Action determination for a portion of the
Facility. After completion of the Public Participation process
required by Paragraphs XI.A.-XI.B. of this Order, the Section shall
either agree or disagree with BE Aerospace's Termination Petition or No
Further Action Petition for a portion of the Facility.
B. If the Section determines that the work required by this Order has not
been completed, the Section shall notify BE Aerospace in writing of
activities that must be undertaken to complete the work, including a
schedule for the performance of such activities. Once these additional
activities are completed, BE Aerospace may file another petition
pursuant to Paragraph XIV.A.
C. If, after completion of the Public Participation process required by
Paragraphs XI.A.-XI.B., the Section concludes that the work required by
this Order has been satisfactorily performed for either the entire
Facility or a portion of the Facility, as the case may be, the Section
shall memorialize its decision in an "Acknowledgment of Termination and
Agreement on Record Preservation and Reservation of Rights" (an
"Acknowledgement") (if all work is completed) or in a No Further Action
Determination for the relevant portion of the Facility (if only the
work for that portion is completed). Except as specified below, all of
BE Aerospace's obligations under this Order shall, with the exception
of those obligations that expressly survive this Order, be deemed to be
satisfied and terminated upon BE Aerospace's execution of the
Acknowledgement.
37

BE Aerospace AOC
XV. Change of Ownership or Operational Control
A. BE Aerospace shall notify the Section in writing ninety (90) calendar
days prior to the date of any change in ownership or operational
control of the property on which the Facility is located or any
proposed change of ownership or operational control of the monitoring
and remediation systems.
B. This Order cannot be transferred to a new owner or operator. BE
Aerospace shall notify the proposed new owner or operator about this
Order, the termination of the Order upon ownership change, and the new
owner or operator's responsibility to file a RCRA Part A permit
application. BE Aerospace shall provide evidence to the Section of the
notification to the proposed new owner or operator pursuant to this
Paragraph. This evidence shall describe how BE Aerospace has assured
compliance with the requirements of Paragraph V.L.6. with respect to
the inauguration of any institutional controls. Additionally, BE
Aerospace shall (1) assure the instrument effecting the conveyance or
transfer of real or personal property interest contains a copy of or
reference to this Order; and (2) use its best efforts to obtain access
agreements to meet the requirements of Paragraph VII.A. from the party
obtaining control of the real or personal property.
C. In the event of change in ownership of the Facility, whether or not
pursuant to a Brownfields Agreement, the Section shall retain all its
applicable enforcement rights against BE Aerospace, including calling
for submission of a RCRA permit application and financial assurance for
a post -closure permit and Corrective Action, and BE Aerospace shall
retain all of its defenses.
D. No change in corporate ownership or corporate status will alter BE
Aerospace's obligations under this Order or excuse BE Aerospace's
noncompliance with this Order or any requirement established pursuant
thereto.
E. No conveyance of title, easement, or other interest in the Facility, or
a portion of the Facility, or the monitoring or remediation system will
affect BE Aerospace's obligations under this Order. This Paragraph
will not apply if the Parties agree pursuant to Paragraph XIV.C. that
this Order has terminated as to the Facility. This Paragraph will not
apply to any portion of the Facility for which the Section has issued a
No Further Action determination (e.g., clean -closed areas).
38

BE Aerospace AOC
M. Decisions/Notification
A. Whenever, under the terms of this Order, written notice is required to
be given or a report or other document is required to be sent by one
party to the other, it shall be directed to the individuals at the
addresses specified below, unless those individuals or their successors
give notice of a change to the other party in writing. All notices and
submissions shall be considered effective upon receipt, unless
otherwise provided. No informal advice,, guidance, suggestions, or
comments by the Section regarding reports, plans, specifications,
schedules or any other matter will relieve BE Aerospace of its
obligation to obtain formal approvals as required by this order.
B . All documents and notices required red to be submitted by BE Aerospace to
the Section pursuant to this Order shall be sent to:
Ms. Elizabeth W. Cannon, Chief
Hazardous Waste Section
Division of Waste Management
N. C. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
C. Unless otherwise agreed to by BE Aerospace, the Section shall direct
all correspondence related to this Order to:
Mr. Mitch Barger, Facility Manager
BE Aerospace, Inc.
1455 Fairchild Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
and
Mr. Ryan Patch, Esq.
Vice -President, Law & General Counsel & Secretary
BE Aerospace, Inc.
1400 Corporate Center Way
Wellington, FL 33414
39

BE Aerospace AOC
XVII. Notice of Non -Liability of the State
A. The State, its agencies, employees and other representatives shall not
be deemed a party to any contract involving BE Aerospace and relating
to activities at the Facility and shall not be liable for any claim or
cause of action arising from or on account of any act or omission of BE
Aerospace, their officers, employees, contractors, receivers, trustees,
agents, assigns, or other representatives in carrying out the
activities required by this Order.
B. The State, its agencies, employees and other representatives shall not
be liable for any injuries or damages to persons or property resulting
from the acts or omissions of BE Aerospace, their officers, employees,
contractors, receivers, trustees, agents, assigns, or other
representatives caused by implementation of this Order or otherwise.
.o

BE Aerospace AOC
XVIII. Reservation of Rights
A. The Section hereby reserves all of its statutory and regulatory powers,
authorities, rights and remedies, both legal and equitable, including
any which may pertain to BE Aerospace's failure to comply with any of
the requirements of this Order. This Order shall not be construed as a
covenant not to sue, or as a release, waiver or limitation of any
rights, remedies, powers and/or authorities, civil or criminal, which
the Section has under RCRA or any other statutory, regulatory, or
common law authority.
B. BE Aerospace's compliance with the terms of this Order shall not
relieve BE Aerospace of any obligation to comply with any other
applicable local, State, or federal laws and regulations. Similarly,
this Order does not relieve BE Aerospace of any obligation to obtain
and comply with any applicable local, State, or federal permit or
approval.
C. The issuance of this Order and BE Aerospace's stipulation to comply
shall not limit or otherwise preclude the Section from taking
additional enforcement action pursuant to RCRA, the North Carolina
General Statutes, or any other authority should the Section determine
that such action is warranted. Nothing in this Order shall be
construed to in any way limit BE Aerospace's ability to defend against
the exercise of any rights that the Section is reserving in this
Paragraph XVIII.
D. The Section expressly reserves all rights and defenses that
it may
have, including the right
to disapprove of work performed
by BE
Aerospace
pursuant to this
Order, to require that BE Aerospace
correct
any work
performed despite
disapproval by the Section, and to
require
that BE
Aerospace perform
tasks in addition to those specifically
stated in
this Order.
E. Notwithstanding compliance with the terms of this Order, BE Aerospace
is not released from liability, if any, for the costs of any response
actions taken by the Section. The Section reserves the right to seek
reimbursement from BE Aerospace for reasonable costs incurred by the
Section in connection with any response action the Section undertakes
or reasonable costs incurred by the Section in overseeing
implementation of this Order, including enforcement costs.
F. BE Aerospace stipulates that pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 130A-18, and
irrespective of all other remedies at law, the Section may file an
action for injunctive relief in the Superior Court of Forsyth County to
enjoin any threatened or continuing violation of the requirements of
this Order or the statutes or rules cited therein, including but not
limited to the requirements for corrective action, or to impose any
emergency response measures deemed necessary to protect human health
and the environment.
G. The Section may impose an administrative penalty on BE Aerospace for
violating the requirements of this Order or the statutes or rules cited
therein. The assessment of an administrative penalty pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 130A-22 will confer on BE Aerospace all rights under Chapter
150B of the North Carolina 'General Statutes to contest the Section's
41

BE Aerospace AOC
decision to impose an administrative penalty, but not to contest the
validity or enforceability of this Order, in so far as BE Aerospace
have both stipulated to the Section's jurisdiction and have waived
their rights to contest the Section's enforcement of the Order pursuant
to Paragraph II.B.
H. The Chief of the Hazardous Waste Section may determine that acts or
circumstances, whether or not directly related to this Order, may
endanger human health, welfare, or the environment and may order BE
Aerospace to stop further implementation of this Order, either
temporarily or permanently, until the endangerment is abated.
I. Nothing in this Order shall be construed as limiting the. Section in
performing its duty to protect the public health and the environment of
the State as required by law. The State may order or independently
initiate any response action it deems necessary to protect public
health, welfare, or the environment.
42

BE Aerospace AOC
XIX. Other Claims
A. Nothing in this order shall constitute or be construed as a release
from any claim, cause of action or demand in law or equity against any
person, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity for any
liability it may have arising out of or relating in any way to the
generation, storage, treatment, handling, transportation, release, or
disposal of any hazardous wastes or hazardous constituents found at,
taken to, or taken from the Facility.
B. Nothing herein shall constitute a satisfaction of, or release from,
liability for any claim arising as a result of operation, ownership or
use of the Facility by BE Aerospace, their agent(s), contractors,
lessees, successors, or assigns.
43

BE Aerospace AOC
XX. Indemnification of the State of North Carolina
BE Aerospace stipulates that it will indemnify, save and hold harmless the
State, its agencies, departments, agents, and employees, from all claims or
causes of action arising from or on account of acts or omissions of BE
Aerospace or their officers, employees, agents, independent contractors,
receivers, trustees, and assigns in carrying out activities required by this
Order. This indemnification will not affect or limit the rights or
obligations of BE Aerospace or the State under their various contracts. This
indemnification will not create any obligation on the part of BE Aerospace to
indemnify the State from claims to the extent arising from the acts or
omissions of the State.
44

BE Aerospace AOC
XXI. Additional Provisions
A. This Order may only be modified in writing. The existing Order shall
remain in effect as written until such time as the Parties have
executed a written amendment to the Order, until such time as the
Section deems the Order satisfied pursuant to the provisions of
Paragraph XIV.C., or until the Order is dissolved pursuant to the
provisions of Paragraph XIII.
B. The signatory for each Party certifies that he or she is fully
authorized to execute (and legally bind such Party to) this document.
C. The annual activity fee specified in N.C.G.S. 130A-294.1 shall be paid
to the Division by BE Aerospace.
D. If any judicial authority holds any provision of this order to be
invalid, the remaining provisions shall remain in force and shall not
be affected.
E. Except as otherwise provided in this Order, the Parties shall bear
their own costs and attorneys fees.
F. A Schedule of Compliance, which lists some of the key submittals
required by this Order, can be found in Attachment E. This is not a
complete list of all due dates nor is the Compliance Schedule intended
to summarize and not modify the requirements of the Order.
G. This Order is effective on the date that the Section signs the Order.
45

BE Aerospace AOC
For the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
aak 10. &44,0- y1a 8�
El' th W. Cannon, Chief date signed
N zardcus Waste Section
NC ivision of Waste Management
For BE Aerospace, Incorporated
Mit Barger date signed
Plant Manager
BE Aerospace, Inc.
46

BE Aerospace AOC
Attachment A
Isoconcentration Map; PCE in Groundwater
47

� W 011WN 1YJr W �O
321�1I3 s-+a+ra ti s'ar� � •a air mo �„ '.c•...r n � �A
aI xa rs+maen 3A
ddM aVl[]IGYJ an ago
,LLTmr! GoaaAaeD MLVANW '
90SM 71Q 'N9= 316
tuaarrra
J-NI m MLAMW
avow
� •mow•: ,a�+•W.w+� ,
• -A
�•d u•}y�aa a+s'su.tlea �.
N� ii JO Yl•d OY pN
wv�+++u� tawavY •�J'
�ar o't.•-J
i •
91d•J truwaM+
IOM�
CMIOY
� WT -
t-NOS
' Nimssnom izndm
JS31 ,
•
tw
t awm�ne n_ .
I ,
annitrlm
SH
0-M
" `J•� �s x
e •,,w
' �tivaa•
n•.e.
r-�
ao-rr
3*W --on ► mvxav s
4avmmn ux3cm7VIA MMAMMU-® 133A-=
,-m% .nto umm 0

BE Aerospace AOC
Attachment B
Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
49

Table 2 - Historic Cnoumdwatw Analytical Results
WE Aerospace Facility, NCDO60302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
I'CE
TCE
i,l-D(3Z
�
"I-TCA
Ssmpie M
Sample Dabs
wOrw
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
2.8
7.0
70
200
0.015
MW-1
02/09/96
290
7.6
<
<
<
<
OM6197
280
6.4
<
68
<
<
04110ml
53
<
<
<
<
<
04m/m
3900
ISO
<
1700
<
<
04MIM
1030
46.4
<
347
<
<
04/19104
96-5
1.5
<
12.4
<
<
04rZ7/05
20
<
<
<
<
<
OQWM
8.4
<
<
<
<
<
03/19/07
3.3
<
<
<
<
<
04MM8
3.7
<
<
<
<
<
04121/09
3.4
<
<
<
<
04/O5J10
2
<
<
<
<
<
10R8/10
25
<
<
<
<
01/24/11
2.6
<
<
<
-
<
04126/11
L4
<
<
<
<
<
07=1
3.6
<
<
<
<
<
101g6111
3.4
<
<
<
<
<
04/03/12
365
<
<
<
<
<
MW-3
02106t96
14W
320
<
<
<
<
05J19/97
940
130
<
<
<
<
07l28/99
VA
92.4
4.46
119
6.4
<
Ol/O.S/00
450
110
6
17
<
<
07/1N01
2100
160
52
<
23.0
<
0024/03
901
64.1
78.9
1.17
32.0
<
04120/04
986
6L6
108
14.1
37.4
<
04128105
900
57
76
<
24
<
04/06/06
2600
<
<
<
<
<
03/20/07
1000
85
100
20
19
<
04PAM
890
56
85
17
11
<
041MO
900
.36
43
11
<
<
05/03/11
370
38
19
30
1.5
<
04/Q2/12
640
42
26
25
1.6
<
MW-4
02106/96
75
<
69
<
8.6
<
'05/16/97
76
3.4
9.3
<
10
<
07/29/99
87.7
3.1
2.5
<
11.5
<
07/10M1
84
<
33
<
12
<
06124103
130
5.6
47.2
<
27.4
<
04/19/04
66.2
4.2
30.1
<
6.4
<
OV27/05
22
3.2
7.4
<
1.8
<
04J05/06
28
3.1
5
<
<
<
04J27109
26
2.2
5.3
<
-
<
04W10
24
1.9
<
<
<
<
05/03/11
18
1.5
2.1
<
<
<
04A03112
16
1.4
1.7
<
<
<
1 of 11 CRB Geological Envac=rA cai 3avicm Inc.

Table 2 - fEstoric Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCDO60302577
1455 Faircbiild Road, Winston-Salem; North Carolina
PCX
TCS
1,1-DCE
ds 1,2
�-TCA
vinyl
Sample ID
Sample Date
DCS
Chloride
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
2.9
7.0
70
200
0.015
MW--5
02/06M
<
<
<
<
<
<
M6197
<
<
<
<
<
<
OWl29/99
<
2.3
<
<
<
<
07A9Ai
<
<
<
<
<
<
08/07/02
<
<
<
<
<
<
06r.AM3
<
<
<
<
<
<
04n9A4
LS
<
<
<
<
<
OV27/05
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/05M
L2
<
<
<
<
<
03/19M7
<
<
<
<
<
<
04129MB
L9
<
<
<
<
<
04/22/09
<
<
<
<
_
<
04A5/10
<
<
<
<
c
<
OV27n 1
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/M2
<
<
<
<
<
<
MW-6
02106196
2000
<
<
<
160
<
05n7/97
14000
<
<
<
<
<
04/1 M
720
<
<
<
<
<
04r20A04
C60
M3
3.1
3.6
10
<
04r27A5
1800
<
<
<
<
<
04MSM
950
<
<
<
<
<
03r10/o7
250
<
<
<
<
<
09n2/07
12
<
<
<
<
<
04/30/08
14
<
<
45
<
<
OV22/09
3.2
<
<
36
-
<
04A6/10
2.2
<
<
26
<
<
10r28/10
190
2.6
1
18
-
<
OLW11
22
<
<
9.2
-
<
05Mn 1
<
<
<
5.9
<
<
07MII1
<
<
<
10
<
< `
10A6111
2.2
<
<
7.1
<
<
OM4/12
<
<
<
3.1
<
<
04/02n2
1
<
<
13
<
<
2 of I I CAB Geology Ewiva namW Sums , ]oa

Table 2 - Mstoric Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Acrospece Facility, NCDO60302577
1455 Fanrhld Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
PCE
TCE
1,1-DCZ
�
1,1,1-TCA
yi
Sample ID
Sample Dace
tbride
OWL
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
2.8
7.0
70
200
0.015
MW 7
OW13196
<
16
<
<
<
<
07/08/96
29
U
<
<
1.0
<
OM6/997
3.4
12
<
6.8
<
<
0729M
13.3
19.2
<
10.5
<
<
02/11/00
11
17
<
<
1.0
<
07/09MI
<
13
<
23
<
<
OW/02
79
19.1
1.6
113
<
<
0624/03
69
99
1.4
5-7
<
<
ON21/04
6.0
12.4
1.1
7.0
<
<
0428/OS
16
16
13
<
<
<
04/'04106
11
23
1.4
14
<
<
03119/07
13
35
17
19
<
<
0429/OS
9
22
1.8
12
<
<
0423/09
5.5
14
1.6
7.7
-
<
04/05/10
4.1
83
<
4.3
<
<
OV02111
3.6
10
<
59
<
<
04AM12
3.6
7.2
<
43
<
<
MW 8
05/19/97
99
45
<
21
<
<
MI/04
33.2
7.2
<
18
<
<
0428/OS
18
4.6'
<
<
<
<
04AWD6
10
3
<
<
<
<
MW 9
05/19197
13
<
<
<
<
<
0729/99
<
<
<
<
<
<
07/09101
<
<
<
<
<
<
08/07IO2
<
<
<
<
<
<
06124M3
<
<
<
<
<
<
ON19104
<
<
<
<
<
<
0427/05
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/05M6
<
<
<
<
<
<
03n9/07
<
<
<
<
<
<
0422109
<
<
<
<
_
<
04r19110
<
<
<
<
<
<
0426/11
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/03/12
<
<
<
<
<
<
MW-10D
=9197
4.7
<
<
<
<
<
0729199
<
<
<
<
<
<
10/12/00
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/10/01
<
<
<
<
<
04123M
<
<
<
<
<
<
04109/03
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/19104
<
<
<
<
<
<
0427105
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/05106
<
<
<
<
<
<
ON19107
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/2MB
<
<
<
<
<
<
042L09
<
<
<
<
<
W26/11
<
<
<
<
<
<
04M12
<
<
<
<
<
<
3 of 11 C RB Geological Eumm =MW Services, Jon

Table 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Resuhs
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCDO60302577
1455 Fairer d Road, Winston -Sal®, North Carolina
PCY
TCE
1,1-DCE
DCZ
1,1,1-TCA
SmVit ID
Sam* Dais
Ckio ide
NC 2L OW Stands d
0.7
2.8
7.0
70
200
0.015
MW-11
050197
2.1
<
<
15
120
<
07nim
L7
<
<
<
20
<
07/09/01
<
<
1.1
<
5
s
OS/07/p2
<
<
<
<
2.2
<
06/24M
<
<
<
<
3.3
<
04/19/04
1.0
<
<
<
4.4
<
04/27/05
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/05106
<
<
<
<
<
<
03n90D7
<
<
<
<
1.1
<
04/OS110
7.4
<
<
<
<
<
01I24/11
13
<
<
<
_
<
04/27/i1
79
<
<
<
<
<
07/12n 1
L7
<
<
<
<
<
IGM6/11
2.2
<
<
<
<
<
Ol/24/L2
L9
<
<
<
<
<
04/03/12
L2
<
<
<
<
<
MW-12D
OS/19/97
49
<
1.3
<
6.0
<
0MAM
109
<
<
<
9.7
<
1W17100
17
<
<
<
<
<
04/10/01
7.6
<
<
<
<
04/13i02
11
<
<
<
<
<
04/0993
M
<
<
<
<
<
04120/04
3.8
<
<
<
<
<
04127/05
15
<
<
<
<
<
04/OS/06
6.4
<
<
<
<
<
0300/07
5
<
<
<
<
<
04/30/08
39
<
<
<
<
<
07rJ3=
5.8
<
<
<
<
<
11/18/08
La
<
<
<
_
<
OQ22/09
28
<
<
<
<
04/OG/10
33
<
<
<
<
<
0-,V=1
1.7
<
<
<
<
<
07fI2n i
LS
<
<
<
<
<
04mn2
L6
<
<
<
<
<
MW-13
05/19197
7.4
<
<
<
<
<
04MM
L3
<
<
<
<
<
03/ZO/07
1.7
<
<
<
<
<
04/26/11
C
<
<
<
<
<
.MW 14D
MOM
1200
170
<
<
<
10/13/00
2000
120
61
<
58
04notol
770
67
75
<
55
<
041z3/02
1600
71
100
<
69
<
OU07/00
1050
4C2
109
1.4
56.9
<
04099
1270
35.8
117
1.16
649
<
OV27/05
2OW
39
100
<
46
<
04OW%
1700
24
56
<
23
<
03/20107
2400
30
91
4.5
25
<
04/3W08
1500
29
61
30
15
<
04/23/09
2000
24
57
110
-
<
04/06/10
900
31
25
220
5.5
<
10=10
1300
27
22
1"
-
<
O1l1M11
1300
23
17
170
-
<
04/25/11
650
<
<
1"
<
<
Man 1
1000
19
11
1Z0
<
<
10/06/11
1200
17
12
67
1.8
<
Oln4/12
900
14
<
50
<
<
04/04/12
1000
<
<
60
<
<
4 of 11 CRB Geological F.wmvumm ul Swvicm,1w,

Table 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCDO60302577
1435 Fairchild Road, Wimston-Salcm, North Carolina
cis L2
9r1de
Sample M
Sample Date
PCE
TCE
1,1-DCE
CZ
"I-TCA
C310
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
2.8
7.0
70
200
0.015
MW-15R
09r26M6
1200
40
70
2
23
<
OMW
1200
42
81
2
22
<
05/01/08
1300
39
83
2.1
17
<
0423/09
1800
38
86
<
-
<
03/10/10
1400
26
64
9.8
<
<
1028/10
16M
27
51
44
-
<
O1/24/11
1100
20
34
44
-
<
05MA I
940
19
38
50
<
<
1O/OvI1
990
19
32
57
3.4
<
01/24/12
990
19
26
66
<
<
04M12
890
19
25
69
<
<
MW-16
05/19/97
1800
70
120
<
270
<
0728/99
773
<
94.1
<
98
<
07/1 U01
930
26
54
2.2
62
<
06iAM
1490
25.2
626
1.66
49
<
04/20/04
1040
16.9
44.4
1s2
27.8
<
0428/05
320
69
18
<
11
<
04106/06
440
5.8
9
<
7.1
<
03/.W
560
11
20
<
10
<
04/30/08
920
10
16
<
6.7
<
0422/09
63D
<
<
<
-
<
04/06/10
720
<
<
22
<
<
0124/11
410
3.9
3.4
4.1
-
<
05=11
310
<
<
<
<
<
O&WA 1
420
<
<
6.7
<
<
04/03/12
290
<
<
8
<
<
MW-17D
ITM99
<
<
<
<
<
<
01105/00
<
<
<
<
<
<
07/09M
<
<
<
<
<
<
O8/ M2
<
<
<
<
<
<
06/ZM
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/19/04
<
<
<
<
<
<
0427/05
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/05M
<
<
<
<
<
<
M/19/07
<
<
<
<
<
0429M
<
<
<
<
<
<
0423109
<
<
<
<
_
<
04/=O
<
<
<
<
<
<
WWI
<
<
<
<
_
<
0427/11
<
<
<
<
<
<
04MM2
<
<
<
<
<
<
5 Of 11 CRB Geological 5Mr= mortal Services, I=

Tabie 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCDO60302577
1455 Fairchild Road Winston-Salem, North Carolina
PCE
TCE
1.1-DCE
cis
1,1,1-TCA
Sample ID
Sample Date
Qlarme
WUL
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
2.8
7.0
70
200
0.015
MW-13
12/15/99
171
13-9
3.6
27-1
2.2
<
07/10/01
71
21
4
33
3.1
<
OSM7/02
50.9
7.71
2S1
15.6
2.0
<
06r24103
so
283
3.9
26.7
2.5
<
04/19/04
227
453
5.6
54.8
2.6
<
04r27M5
L%
43
6.3
<
3.1
<
04/05/06
210
36
6
82
<
<
03/20/U7
98
20
4.6
53
13
<
09/12/D7
93
33
23
30
13
<
04i30/08
160
11
1.6
24
<
<
04r,!IW
160
11
2.1
23
-
<
09/02/09
210
25
<
27
-
<
041WO
180
is
2
26
<
<
lOr'281i0
80
22
1.6
25
-
<
OinAn 1
85
13
L5
25
-
<
051D31i1
86
10
1.7
25
<
<
O&WIII
1"
19
1.8
41
<
<
10/06/11
78
9.8
<
25
<
<
O V24112
91
10
12
25
<
<
041D3/12
130
16
L7
34
<
<
MW-19
OI/U6/00
LSD
8
48
<
<
<
04/10/01
64
<
55
<
23
<
04 ASM
220
<
49
<
12
<
04/09/03
70
133
36.1
<
as
<
04/19/04
74.5
19
36.8
<
10.5
<
OV27/05
220
6.5
100
<
16
<
04/05/06
180
4.8
100
<
14
<
O:i120/07
180
3.8
140
1
15
<
04r3O108
00
3
130
<
93
<
04ram
120
23
110
<
-
<
04AMO
100
1.7
33
<
3.6
<
101r_WO
110
22
32
<
<
OV24111
100
1.6
68
<
<
OSMA 1
65
1.1
49
<
2Z
<
O&M 1
85
1.5
64
<
2.7
<
I O/06/11
83
13
53
<
z 1
<
OV24112
37
<
19
<
<
<
04/04/12
53
1
30
<
1.4
<
MW-20
01/06/00
44
6
11
<
5
<
07/10/01
72
7.6
16
<
89
<
OSK17/02
"1
5.6
3S8
<
8.0
<
06(24/03
274
73
109
1.1
31.2
<
04J19N4
267
5.2
188
1.0
243
<
04127M
250
6.4
220
<
31
<
04105M
L50
<
120
<
<
<
03r10107
230
5.8
220
12
22
<
04/30/08
210
SS
270
12
15
<
04r,aW
140
4.4
130
<
-
<
04 %10
33
2.6
8.4
<
<
<
OSM3111
49
3
36
<
L7
<
D4=12
64
3.2
31
<
1.4
<
6 of 11 Cos Gaclagcal Pzmrw oenral Swvw= lw-

Table 2 - ffistoric Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCDO60302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
TCE
1,1-DC11
�
1.1,1-TCA
vinCkioaide
�he ID
�le DatePCE
NC 2L GW S
0.7
2-8
7.0.
70
200
0.015
Mw-21D
❑msm
1"0
68
1"Q
<
180
c
07110tot
2200
70
1"
1.9
150
<
OVOW Y2
1480
39.2
140
11.9
96
<
06rl"3
1090
26.5
121
<
89
<
004"
1580
34.9
139
13
67.3
<
04I27/05
17W
26
93
<
49
<
04/05/06
5600
<
<
<
<
<
03i20/07
2200
18
50
7.4
16
<
041301n8
1200
12
21
8
6.6
<
04/2M
880
<
<
<
<
0~0
1400
<
<
<
<
<
10I.28110
1600
9.9
6 9
21
-
<
OM4111
1500
13
6.6
26
-
<
05mm 1
970
<
<
26
<
<
08I07111
1300
12
<
37
<
<
10AW1I
1300
13
3.8
37
<
<
0MV12
ON
18
<
62
<
<
04AWU
SM
1S
<
68
<
MW 2ZD
0110900
sm .
55
20
<
50
<
0111110I
200
8.1
3.5
13
2.5
<
08/07/02
941
263
42.3
11.9
29.7
<
06/24/03
<
<
<
<
<
<
0M'04
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/27/05
<
<
<
<
<
<
04F%M
<
<
<
2.6
<
<
04130/08
38
29
11
87
<
<
04117l09
31
<
<
6.2
-
<
04/04/12
190
17
23
130
<
<
MW M
01/06M
1200
29
130
<
150
<
021111M
1200
<
]30
<
_ 110
<
07110/Ol
1000
22
62
<
63
<
0604/03
465
9
43.8
<
33
<
04/20/04
440
6.73
30.9
<
19.7
<
04iZ8/05
770
8
16
<
11
<
04105/06
680
<
<
<
<
<
03(20/07
9W
7.1
9.3
<
5.7
<
04%Ms
1000
6.2
7
<
2 6
<
04 22W
320
<
12
680
0.019
04106/10
93
<
<
4W
<
<
05/Q3/11
18
1.4
2-4
450
<
6.4
04"12
7.7
<
<
200
<
<
MW 24
OV06100
1100
67
66
<
52
<
04rAm
MDO
87
68
<
57
<
0711=1
930
55
61
3.4
39
<
OSM102
620
38
49
6.3
25
<
OF 24103
$02
55
57
16
24
<
34=104
1040
85
48
13
13
<
04128105
530
66
38
<
9.9
<
04J06106
510
44
29
20
<
<
OM20107
610
56
46
21
11
<
04r30108
570
42
22
13
5.2
<
041L109
520
21
12
11
-
<
04AWIO
560
26
12
L
<
<
05=11
460
13
8.1
9.7
1.7
<
04AW12
490
23
<
15
<
<
7 of 11 CRB Geological P,rvimpmenW Savicm. Inc.

Table 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Amugx= Facility, NCDO 0302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Wimston Salem, North Carolina
7rwe
Sample m
Sampk Date
PClz
TCE
1,1-DCE
D�
1,1.2-TCA
Chlo
NC 2L GW Standad
0.7
2.8
7.0
70
20C
0.015
MW 26D
01/05100
10
<
<
<
<
<
07110/01
La
<
<
<
<
<
0907/02
<
<
<
<
<
<
06 24/03
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/19p4
<
<
<
<
<
<
O4n7/05
<
<
<
<
<
<
04MM6
<
<
<
<
<
<
03nW07
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/30/08
<
<
<
<
<
<
04n7109
<
<
<
<
_
<
04/06n0
<
<
<
<
<
<
051M 1
35
3.1
<
5
<
<
07n2/11
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/=2
<
<
<
<
<
<
MW-27D
OU06/00
8
<
<
<
<
<
07/09001
4.5
1.5
<
<
<
<
0M02
3.9
1.0
<
<
<
<
06Q4/03
2.1
<
<,
<
<
<
0412W
3.4
<
<
<
<
<
0412=5
L5
<
<
<
<
<
04p4M6
2.2
<
<
<
<
<
W20/07
29
<
<
<
<
1.7
OS/Ol/08
2.7
<
<
<
<
<
04n3/09
2.6
<
<
<
_
<
04MMO
2.2
<
<
<
<
<
94/26n 1
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/03n2
<
<
<
<
<
<
MW 27DD
07MMI
<
1.4
<
<
<
<
OW07002
<
<
<
1.08
<
<
MOM
<
<
<
<
<
<
04n0/04
<
<
<
<
<
<
04=5
<
<
<
<
<
<
0004M
<
<
<
<
<
<
O3/2W07
L2
1.1
<
<
<
<
04MM
L3
<
<
<
_
<
04M7/10
<
<
<
<
<
<
Q4r" 1
<
<
<
<
<
<
0443/12
<
<
<
<
<
<
MW-28
01/WM
13
<
<
<
<
<
07M9A1
16
53
1.6
<
2.0
<
04M)M
18
6.6
<
1-2
1.7
<
06n4Ai
48.2
1L4
9.3
<
7.1
<
04n1A4
24.1
53
2.4
<
2.5
<
04n8105
5
is
<
<
<
<
04/04/06
&1
1.3
<
<
<
<
O3/19/07
15
1.3
<
<
<
<
04n9/08
&1
1.2
<
<
<
<
O4/22/09
3.3
<
<
<
_
<
04/05/10
9.1
1.8
<
<
<
<
OWAn1
5.3
1.5
<
<
<
<
04103/12
4.5
<
<
<
<
<
8 of 11 CRB Geoiogieal Hm beemeatil Se vim, hr.

Table 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCDO60302577
1455 Fairchild Road,WinstotrSalem, North Carolina
PCX
TCE
1;1-DCY
cm 1.2
1,1,1-TCA
Vinyl
Sample ID
Sample Dote
WEQlorlde
NC 2L GW SUndw&
0.7
2.9
7.0
70
200
0.015
MW-29
OIAMW
350
6
7
<
16
<
=I/00
280
7.4
8.9
<
19
<
0771QMI
360
7.7
4.6
3.2
9.1
<
08/07/02
250
S9
<
1.7
10.4
<
0624103
1410
11.7
79
1.9
13.9
<
04/19/04
1410
7.4
3.5
1.8
5.58
<
O 27/05
1200
<
<
<
<
<
04/05/06
620
<
<
<
<
<
0320/07
550
3.9
<
2.1
<
<
04/30/08
58
<
<
<
<
<
0422/09
180
<
<
100
..
<
04AW10
320
<
<
61-1
<
<
05ml1
13
<
<
54
<
<
04/02n2
13
<
<
20
<
<
MW 30
01/05/00
3400
39
38
<
120
<
04/26M
8100
<
<
<
<
<
04/10/01
29M
35
21
<
<
04/09/03
7450
48.9
10Z
4.0
36.5
<
0420/04
14200
a6
9-1
7.5
299
<
04/27/05
3900
<
<
<
<
<
04M5/06
5500
is
<
<
<
<
03rAW07
1500
4.7
<
1.5
1.4
<
09/12W
170
<
16
<
<
<
045=8
40
<
<
<
<
<
0422/09
21
<
<
3.0
-
<
04/1l6/10
24
<
<
8.2
<
<
05=11
53
1.1
<
16
<
<
01/24/12
48
1.1
<
46
<
<
04AXM
32
1
<
19
<
<
MW-32
03131/00
48
21
<
<
<
<
07AW01
27
13
<
<
<
<
0428/05
23
5.8
<
<
<
<
04/04/D6
41
5.8
<
13
<
<
032M
32
6.5
<
1.9
<
<
0429/08
20
4.2
<
13
r
<
0423/09
14
2 5
<
<
<
04/06/IO
18
31
<
<
<
<
051=1
17
1.6
<
<
<
<
04/041I2
9.9
1.1
<
<
<
<
MW 33
Owl/00
53
<
<
<
<
<
04AOIOI
17
<
<
<
<
0423M
is
1.2
<
<
<
<
04/09/03
7.2
<
<
<
<
<
04MM4
24
<
<
<
<
<
0428/05
43
<
<
<
<
<
04/04/06
46-
1
<
<
<
<
0320/07
36
<
<
<
<
<
046=8
10
<
<
<
<
<
04MIM
10
<
<
<
<
04/07/10
69
<
<
<
<
<
0124A1
14
<
<
<
<
<
04MIl1
s
<
<
<
<
<
Or=1
7.8
<
<
<
<
<
10n06111
6
<
<
<
<
<
O1t24/12
63
<
<
<
<
<
04/03/12
5.2
<
<
<
<
<
9 of 11 CRB Gao6oal E-mrmwwrW Swvmm, If=

Table 2 - F istaric Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCDO60302577
1455 Fwrchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Sample ID
Sample Date
PCi
TCE
1,1-I1(E
D
1,1.1-TCA
C��yide
ML
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
2.8
7.0
70
200
0.015
RW-1
03/31100
25W
27
19
<
64
<
10/12100
S300
<
<
<
<
<
07/11/01
1500
<
<
<
<
<
W18/02
1030
7.21
4.9
<
10.6
<
06n403
4150
17J
8.3
20
18
<
04/10/04
6740
1700
30
89
4.6
120
3.7
<
15.5
89
<
<
RW-2
03)31/00
10/12M
2200
<
160
<
120
<
07/11)Q1
2000
<
180
<
<.
<
08/07142
1710
56.7
136
1.6
99
<
06C4/03
1250
43-9
463
<
72.8
<
RW-3
03/31/00
140
22
<
16
<
<
MUM
280
27
1.1
16
1.2
<
07/11M1
160
25
<
20
<
<
08/06/02
171
19.9
<
19.4
<
<
06/24103
190
22.4
2.4
223
<
<
042104
164
18
1.1
19.4
<
<
04/28A5
100
12
<
<
<
<
04106M
75
7.9
<
14
<
<
0311=
140
13
<
20
<
<
05/01m
91
8.6
<
1.5
<
<
04/23/09
89
as
<
11
-
<
04/06l10
46
4.6
<
6.8
<
<
OSI02J11
34
3
<
3.7
<
<
04103/12
28
2.7
<
14
<
<
B-2
03r-=
3
<
1
<
<
<
C-3
04/06110
4
<
<
<
<
<
04/04/12
43
1.0
20
20
<
<
C-4
04r3W08
68
4.5
18
2.9
<
<
C-5
12112106
59
<
<
<
<
<
04I06✓10
1000
<
<
<
<
<
04J04/12
47
<
<
<
<
<
C4
04/06/10
24
<
<
15
<
<
C-9
O4y06/10
990
<
<
75
<
<
0Mb4/12
1100
<
<
270
<
<
C-11
07r25/06
2"
2-2
<
1.1
1.3
<
12/12106
5
<
<
<
<
<
0312 V
69
<
<
<
<
<
04/30108
14
1
<
1.7
<
<
D-2
10106111
360
<
84
19
<
<
D-3
10/06/11
5
<
<
5.8
<
<
D-5
07/25/06
380
2.4
2
<
2.4
<
03r20/07
190
<
<
6.7
<
<
04r30/OS
6
<
<
35
<
<
10 Of 11 CBS Ckal4col Envb=nenW 3mvicM lac

Table 2 - 11istoric Groundwater Aaalydcal Remft
M Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fated Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
PCE
TCE
1.14DCE
1,1.1-TCA
vtRyl-
Sam le ID
p
Sample Date
�
CSloride
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
2.8
7.0
70
200
0.015
D-7
07l25106
37W
13
5
2.6
6.6
<
121UA6
1700
11
4.9
1.6
2-9
<
03/20/07
2400
10
<
<
<
<
04/30/08
1200
46
4
750
<
7-2
04112/09
110•
<
<
2000
-
28
04r IO
65
<
<
S80
<
<
10/06/11
82
<
<
87
<
L9
04/04/12
18
<
<
110
<
<
D-11
04/07/10
L3
<
<
<
<
<
F-2
12/13/06
21
3.9
21
12
2.2
<
03RN07
21
6.2
18
1.7
<
L6
F-3
12/13/06
7.2
<
<
<
<
<
F�
04MS/12
15
1.8
<
3.7.
<
<
-Below Detectiaa limits TCE-Triclilmocthme TCA-Trichlofoedme
M-Duplicate Sample DCE-Dichlmoetbem PCE-Teuw.hloroed=
NC 2L-North Carolina Title 15 A Subchapter 2L Gmundwatrr Quality Sttmdmds.
11 of 11 CRB Geological EnimommW Services, Ina.

BE Aerospace AOC
Attachment C
Injection Well and Aeration Well Locations
60

„w
,
7
' AG2
sTM f VIED
+ -1
A-
CYA-SVE- IP-9 -6
�•,
-u
CYA-SVE_ \ IP-10
BUILDING 1A
r4-3
-13
CYA-SVE-1 \0 ra
�`, ��
; BUILDING 2
IP-
`
FEl
7
+
• IP-7
B-3
IP- a
i
1
rP_e
'
• s-1 a-
Ip- ■ —u
+IP-
' TP-1 ■ �2
' •c-
1
1
C' C 2 C•4 C-5 A C C-B
-9 C-!0 -ll
BUILDING 1
i
rMSSANMTNY
r
r
r
D-3
------- —
Kvi
D-4 7
�8
1
}
7 ■ ■
} D-9 D-10 •
`
1
r
r
t
1
1
-
7
1
F
,
t
7
1
HUILDD4C, 3
r
r
�
-
t
I
t i
�
I
t
t
1�
+
1
r
7
A>�FY117
+
i
,
r
PAR@IG
+
t
�
i
1
I
j
t
BUILDING 3A
r
1
t
r
1
I
t
I
'
i
r
t
1 II NV—Q3 i
i
I
'
T
T
i
b Fog Fo4
■ t
#
1
1
o ■
-1 F-3 F-5 F-6
1
,
I AfPWILT i
1
I PAIi@G
i
+
t -Fil
t
t
1
7
7
t
t
t
i • �
-3
1
t
1
_----- ----- — ----------
r
i
MODS
”
lI7
3
V-4 AV
MV-1j
�AV-3
SAW-2 aRV-3
/•
--
FAIRCHILD ROAD
LEGENIN
o INJECTION VELL/POINT `\
MV-1 ® MONUORIrG WELL
GRAPHIC SCALE
RW-1 RECOVERY WELL
® AERATION WELL
10�
----PROPERTY BOUNDARY
FENCE
\
trnn plCTml VDL [+1 I a MMTMyrATM"s
tMWx
ve r�A
A A=
cal
1m
I 011D
NDWrMA- M" GIi11DY
.DI.
. Q�baL i�tal Drr�w. Yre RYA 4fO I�wl� a fFWt
W ft � �
C...T rl.tw aNs
FIGURE
�,
Trpsr. Oow-007-C r)r
re. ourr®
a
t1INM1 .e L Nau K +olo
Dlo,o rn sv >w n.
5
i1 � w...r t../�.NRANL.L,fMrr�fr
er...�r+ ►I..r. rr.ti

BE Aerospace AOC
Attachment D
AOC (Docket #99-126)
62

ANOR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
September 2, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL .
RETURN RECIEPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jeffrey P. Holtzman
Vice President
B. E. Aerospace, Inc.
1455 Fairchild Road
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
RE: Administrative Order on Consent
B. E. Aerospace, Inc.
Winston-Salem North Carolina
NCD060302577 Docket# 99-126
Dear Mr. Holtzman:
Please find enclosed one signed original of the revised Administrative Order on
Consent concerning the subject facility. The provisions of this order are now in
effect. Please contact Doug Roberts at [phone] ext.233 if you should have
any questions concerning this order.
Sincerely,
I
Burton, Acting Chief
ous Waste Section
Enclosure: Administrative Order on Consent (1 original)
c: Doug Holyfield
Stephen Phibbs
Jesse Wells
Doug Roberts
Bill Miller
rc: Linda Culpepper
Helen Cotton

North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Hazardous Waste Section
In Re: B/E Aerospace, Inc. ) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
1455 Fairchild Road ) ON CONSENT
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105 ) Docket # 99-126
NCD 060302 577 )
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
With the consent of B/E Aerospace, Inc. (BEAI), current owner of the Former Bums
Aerospace Corp. facility on Fairchild Road in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina,
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources of the State of North Carolina
(Department), through its Division of Waste Management (Division), issues this Administrative
Order on Consent (Order) to amicably resolve issues concerning the management of hazardous
wastes located at the facility on Fairchild Road.
STIPULATIONS
1. BEAI and the Division agree and stipulate to the following:
a. On December 18, 1980, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
authorized North Carolina to operate a state hazardous waste program in accordance with
the provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.),
the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act (NC General Statutes 130A), and the
rules promulgated thereunder and codified in Subchapter 13A of Title 15A of the North
Carolina Administrative Code, 15A NCAC 13A.
b. Pursuant -to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the North Carolina
Solid Waste Management Act (herein referred to as the "Act"), and rules promulgated
thereunder (herein referred to as the "Rules"), the Department is authorized to enforce
standards for generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous
wastes. The Director of the Division of Waste Management, Williarri L. Meyer, is
delegated that authority from the Secretary of the Department.
c. BEAI is the owner of property located on Fairchild Road, in Winston-Salem, Forsyth
County, North Carolina (herein referred to as the "Site"). The site is utilized for the
manufacture of passenger seats for the aerospace industry.

d. BEAI is a personas defined in N.C.G.S. 130A-290 (a) (22) and 15A NCAC 13A .0102.
BEAI has managed hazardous waste at the site.
While investigating the site prior to purchasing it from Bums Aerospace, BEAI
discovered environmental contamination near the hazardous waste storage area. BEAI
notified the Division of the contamination and, in October 1996, submitted a report
entitled "Ground Water Monitoring Results".
f. On December 20, 1996, the Division of Water'Quality issued to BEAI a notice of
violation of Subpart 2L groundwater standards based on the notification provided by
BEAI.
g. In March, 1997, BEAI submitted a Comprehensive Site Assessment Workplan and on
September 16, 1997, submitted a Comprehensive Site Assessment Report.
h. Hazardous wastes which had been managed at the site include: tetrachloroethane and
methylene chloride (F002), 1, 1, 1 -tricloroethene and carbon tetracloride (F001), xylene,
acetone, ethyl acetate and ethyl benzene (F003), electroplating sludges (F006) and
aluminum conversion coating sludges (F019).
i. On February 4, 1'998, Mr. Doug Roberts and Mr. Stephen Phibbs of the Hazardous Waste
Section conducted a site inspection.
j. On June 10, 1998, BEAI submitted a Comprehensive Site Assessment Workplan
Addendum (CSAWA).
k. In the CSAWA, BEAI. proposed that upon the Division's approval of the CSAWA, BEAI
would complete its plan for further subsurface assessment within four (4) weeks and
would submit a Comprehensive Site Assessment Addendum.report within ninety (90)
days.
i. BEAI is responsible for the storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste at the site.
m. The areas identified in the September 16, 1997 Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
as being affected by releases of hazardous waste and hazardous waste constituents were
hazardous waste storage units. Because of the nature of the releases to the environment
from these locations, these units are now considered hazardous waste disposal units.
n. The Division has jurisdiction under RCRA, the Act, and the Rules to require closure of
the hazardous waste disposal units at the site.
2

RELEVANT STATUTES AND REGULATIONS
2. The following statutes and regulations are relevant to the conditions at the site:
a. Wastes which are subject to regulation as hazardous wastes under Title 40, Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 262 through 265, 268, 270, 271 and 124, are identified
in 40 CFR 261.1(a) as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A .0106.
b. The solid -wastes referred to in 40 CFR 261.1(a) are subject to the notification
requirements of section 3010 of RCRA (42 U.S.C. 6930).
c. Pursuant to 40 CFR 261.2(b), as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A .0106,
materials are a solid waste if they are abandoned by being:
is Disposed of; or
ii. Burned or incinerated; or
iii. Accumulated, stored, or treated (but not recycled) before or in lieu of being
abandoned by being disposed of, burned, or incinerated.
d. Pursuant to 40 CFR 261.3(a), as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A. 0106, a solid
waste is hazardous if:
i. It is not excluded from regulation as a hazardous waste under section 261.4(b); and
ii. It meets any of the following criteria:
(1) It exhibits any of the characteristics of hazardous waste identified in
Subpart C.
(2) It is listed in Subpart D and has not been excluded from the lists in Subpart D
under Sections 260.20 and 260.22.
(3) It is a mixture of a solid waste and a hazardous waste that is listed in Subpart D
solely because it exhibits one or more of the characteristics of hazardous waste
identified in Subpart C, unless the resultant mixture no longer exhibits any
characteristics of hazardous waste identified in Subpart C.
(4) It is a mixture of solid waste and one or more hazardous wastes listed in Subpart
D and has not been excluded under sections 260.20 and 260.22.
3

e. Pursuant to GS 130A-290(a)(6), "disposal" is the discharge, deposit, injection, dumping,
spilling, leaking, or placing of any solid waste into or on any land or water so that the
solid waste or any constituent part of the solid waste may enter the environment or be
emitted into the air or discharged into any waters, including groundwater.
f. Pursuant to GS 130A-290(a)(41), "storage" is the containment of solid waste either on a
temporary basis or for a period of years in a manner which does not constitute disposal.
g. 15A NCAC 13A .0109(a), states that any person who treats, stores or disposes of
hazardous waste shall comply with the requirements set forth in this section. The
treatment, storage or disposal of hazardous waste is prohibited except as provided in this
section.
3. With the consent of BEAI, the Division hereby issues the following Order:
a. The provisions of this Order shall henceforth govern the remedial actions of BEAI with
regard to hazardous waste disposal units at this site.
b. BEAI shall comply with 40 CFR 265.90-265.94, adopted by'reference at 15A NCAC 13A
.0110, by performing the following actions:
BEAI shall submit to the Division a proposal to characterize subsurface conditions at
the site. The proposal submitted must include, at a minimum, a plan to characterize
the subsurface conditions at the site and determine the ground water flow direction.
The plan must describe, at a minimum, the installation of one boring to auger refusal
and three borings completed in the surficial aquifer. Each boring must be completed
according to ASTM D-1586 and the soil classified by ASTM D-2488. Temporary or
permanent monitoring wells must be installed in the three borings completed in the
surficial aquifer. Each well must be screened in the surficial aquifer only. The
elevation of the top of the casing at each well site must be determined, and based
upon stabilized ground water level readings, the ground water flow direction must be
determined. The plan must also include a site map (minimum scale: 1" = 200')
identifying the. property line, plant building(s), waste management unit(s), ponds,
well(s) and other pertinent structures. Well construction schematics must also be
included. (Note: If temporary wells are installed, then the casing must be removed
and the borings backfilled with a grout or grout bentonite mixture as soon as
technically feasible and in accordance with the North Carolina Well Construction
Standards.) On June 10, 1998, BEAI submitted its CSAWA, the review of which has
not yet been completed by the Division. The CSAWA may suffice as the proposal
required under this paragraph if it is found to include each of the items requiredby
this paragraph. BEAT agrees to respond promptly to any notice of a deficiency in the
CSAWA and to submit any missing information within thirty (30) calendar days.
4

ii. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days following approval by the Division of the
CSAWA, BEAT shall install the borings/wells, characterize the subsurface conditions,
determine the ground water flow direction (both vertically and horizontally), and
submit a ground water monitoring plan. The work required under this paragraph may
be commenced prior to the Division's review of the CSAWA subject to any
modifications or additions to the CSAWA that may still be required for its final
approval. The Division agrees to exert its best efforts to coordinate with BEAI to
help minimize additional costs due to any delay in the Division's final approval of the
CSAWA.
(1.) the boring logs and water levels from the initial borings/wells.
(2.) a description of the site, local and regional hydrogeologic conditions.
(3.) the location of initial borings/wells and proposed additional ground water quality
monitoring well(s) on a site map. These wells must include a minimum of one
upgradient and three downgradient wells. The downgradient wells must be
located within 50 feet of the regulated unit(s).
(4.) the construction design for each of the wells including depth and screened
interval.
(5.) the sample collection and analysis procedures to be utilized in sampling of
ground water quality monitoring wells. A guidance document is enclosed to
assist in the development of a Sampling and Analysis Plan.
(6.) a schedule for the collection and analysis of ground water samples on a quarterly
basis. The quarterly sampling schedule must include the following:
(A) ground water monitoring wells to be sampled;
(B) specific months during which quarterly ground -water monitoring will be
performed; and
(C) analysis for the following parameters: arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead,
volatile and semi -volatile organic compounds, pH, specific conductance,
ground -water surface elevation. The parameter list maybe modified based
on the identification of hazardous waste constituents in the ground water.
Note: This office must be notified 10 working days prior to the first sample
collection date. Analytical results of ground water samples must be
submitted within sixty (60) calendar days of the ground water
monitoring event.
5

(7). Not later than ninety (90) calendar days following approval by the Division of the
CSAWA, BEAI shall submit a Comprehensive Site Assessment Addendum
(CSAA) report. Since previous investigations have identified ground water
contamination in the vicinity of the hazardous waste storage area, the CSAA
report shall include a ground water assessment plan in accordance with 40 CFR
265.93, as adopted by reference in 15A NCAC 13A. 0110. The plan must
describe the steps to be taken to complete the ground water assessment and
specify the number, location and depth of wells; a quarterly ground water
monitoring schedule; evaluation procedures, including any use of previously
.gathered ground water quality data; and a schedule of implementation. The plan
must be capable of determining:
(A) the rate and extent of migration of hazardous waste or hazardous waste
constituents in the ground water; and
(B) the concentration of hazardous waste or hazardous waste constituents in the
ground water.
iii. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days following submission to the Division of the
ground water monitoring plan, BEAI shall install ground water monitoring wells and
initiate a sampling schedule whether or not the CSAWA or any ground water
monitoring plan has been approved by the Division. The work required under this
paragraph may be commenced prior to the Division's approval of the CSAWA or any
ground water monitoring plan. However, such work is subject to modification or
additional work that may be required prior to the Division's final approval. A
determination whether the investigative work conducted under this subparagraph is
complete may be made by the Division separate and apart from its approval or
disapproval of the CSAWA. The Division agrees to exert its best efforts to
coordinate with BEAI to help minimize additional costs due to any delay in the
Division's final approved of the CSAWA or ground water monitoring plan.
c. BEAI shall comply. with 40, CFR 265.112(a), as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A
.0110. BEAI shall have a written closure plan for the Hazardous Waste Storage Area and
shall submit six (6) copies of this plan to the Division for approval within sixty (60)
calendar days of the effective date'of this Order. BEAI shall keep a copy of the closure
plan and all revisions to the plan at the facility until closure is completed and certified in
accordance with Section 265.115. This plan must identify the steps necessary to
completely close the units at the facility. The closure plan must include, at least:
i. A description of how each hazardous waste management unit at the facility will be
closed in accordance with Section 265.111;
ii. A description of how final closure of the facility will be conducted in accordance with
Section 265.111. -The description must identify the maximum extent of the operation
which will be unclosed during the active life for the facility;
9

iii. An estimate of the maximum inventory of hazardous wastes ever on -site over the
active life of the facility and a detailed description of the methods to be used during
closure, including, but not limited to methods for removing, transporting, treating,
storing or disposing of all hazardous waste, identification of and the type(s) of off -site
hazardous waste management unit(s) to be used, if applicable;
iv. A detailed description of the steps needed to remove or decontaminate all hazardous
waste residues and contaminated containment system components, equipment,
structures, and soils during closure including, but not limited to, procedures for
cleaning equipment and removing contaminated soils, methods for sampling and
testing surrounding soils, and criteria for determining the extent of decontamination
necessary to satisfy the closure performance standard;
v. A detailed description of other activities necessary during the closure period to ensure
that closure satisfies the closure performance standards, including, but not limited to,
ground water monitoring, leachate collection, and run-on and run-off control; and
vi. A schedule for closure of the hazardous waste management unit. The schedule must
include, at a minimum, the total time required to close and the time required for
intervening closure activities which will allow tracking of the progress of closure.
(For example, in the case of a landfill unit, estimates of the time required to treat or
dispose of all hazardous waste inventory and of the time required to place a final
cover must be included.).
vii. BEAI may continue to use the storage area for the accumulation of hazardous waste in
accordance with 40 CFR PART 262 as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A
.0107, provided such use does not interfere with the investigation and
decontamination of the storage area
d. Comply with 40 CFR 265.118 (a), as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A .0110.
BEAI shall have a written post -closure plan for the Hazardous Waste Storage Area, which
meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of Section 265.118, and shall submit six (6)
copies of this plan to the Division for approval within thirty (30) calendar days of
approval of the closure plan.
e. Comply with 40 CFR 265.142(a), as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A .0110.
BEAI shall have a detailed written estimate, in current dollars, of the cost of closing the
facility in accordance with the requirements in Sections 265.111 through 265.115 and
applicable closure requirements of Sections 265.178, 265.197, 265.228; 265.258,
265.280, 265.310, 265.351, 265.381, and 265.404.
f. Comply with 40 CFR 265.143, as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A .0110, and
265.145, as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A .0110. BEAI shall within sixty (60)
calendar days from submittal of the closure plan demonstrate financial assurance for
closure in accordance with the requirements of these sections. Should BEAI fail to
complete closure within one hundred and eighty (180) days of approval by the Division of

its closure plan, BEAI shall at that time immediately demonstrate Iiability coverage in
accordance with 40 CFR 265.147, as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A .0110(h).
g. Comply with 40 CFR 265.144(a), as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A .0110.
BEAI shall have a detailed written estimate in current dollars of the annual cost of post -
closure monitoring and maintenance of the Hazardous Waste Storage Area in accordance
with the applicable post -closure regulations in Sections 265.117, 265._180, 265.228,
265.258, 265.280, and 265.310.
h. Comply with 40 CFR 265.145, as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A .0110. BEAI
shall within sixty (60) calend ar days from submittal of the post -closure plan demonstrate
financial assurance for post -closure in accordance with the requirements of these- sections.
i. Comply with 40 CFR 270.14(a), as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A.0113. BEAI
shall complete, sign, and submit Part A of the permit application to the Division as
described in this section and sections 270.70 through 270.73 within thirty (30) calendar
days of the effective date of this Order. BEAT shall also complete, sign and submit six (6)
copies of Part B of the permit application within six months of its receipt of the
Division's request for submission of the Part B.
j. Comply with 40 CFR 264.101, as adopted by reference at 15A NCAC 13A .0109, by
implementing a corrective action program that, at a minimum includes the following:
L In the ground water assessment plan described in subparagraph b.ii.(7) above, BEAT
shall include provisions to determine the concentration, vertical and horizontal extent,
and rate of migration of contamination in the soil and ground water that may have
resulted from any releases of hazardous 'constituents at the site, including but not
limited to the Hazardous Waste Storage Area, the Stormwater Outfall and Air
Compressor Area, the Courtyard, and the Former. Fairchild Shed.
ii. In accordance with the schedule of the approved site -wide ground water assessment
plan, BEAI shall submit a report that describes the site conceptual model and the
results of the ground water assessment. The description of the site conceptual model
must be supported with documentation (i.e. text and illustrations) sufficient to
understand the transport and fate of known and potential releases and to identify all
potential receptors of those releases.
Note: In the event that additional site characterization activities are necessary to
complete the site -wide ground water assessment, a workplan must be
included in the report describing the additional activities that will be
performed.
iii. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days following approval by the Division of a
completed site assessment report, BEAI shall submit to the Division a site
remediation plan. The remediation plan must describe the procedures for remediation
of the site, including, but not limited to ground water remediation, soil treatment/
removal, sampling to evaluate the adequacy of the remedy, and a schedule of

implementation. Upon approval of the remediation plan, BEAI shall implement the
plan in accordance with the approved schedule.
Note: BEAI is encouraged to implement interim remedies (e.g. soil removal) in the
event that it becomes prudent to remove or minimize a source area to protect
human health or the environment and reduce long-term environmental .
liabilities. If BEAI elects to propose an interim remedy, a workplan detailing
the proposed activities and including a schedule must be submitted to this
office for approval.
k. Any hazardous waste generated during the investigation or remediation must be managed
in compliance with 40 CFR 262.34(a), as adopted by reference at ISA NCAC 13A.0107.
DESIGNATED PROJECT COORDINATORS
4. Documents, including reports, approvals, disapprovals, and other correspondence which must
be submitted under this Order, shall be sent to the following addresses and to any other
addresses which BEAI and the Division designate in writing:
a. Documents submitted to the Division shall be sent to:
Jill E. Burton, Acting Chief
Hazardous Waste Section
401 Oberlin Rd., Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27605
b. Submittals to BEAI shall be addressed to:
Jeffrey P. Holtzman
Vice President
B/E Aerospace, Inc.
1400 Corporate Way
Wellington, FL 33414
DELAY IN PERFOUTANCE
5. If any event occurs which causes delay in the achievement of the requirements of this Order,
BEAI shall have the burden of demonstrating that the delay was caused by circumstances
beyond the reasonable control of BEAI which could not be overcome by its due diligence.
BEAI shall promptly notify the Division orally and shall, within seven (7) calendar days of
oral notification to the Division, advise the Division in writing of the anticipated length and
cause of the delay and the timetable by which BEAI intends to obtain compliance. If the
Division agrees that the delay has been or will be caused by circumstances beyond the
reasonable control of BEAI, the time for performance will be extended for a period equal to

the delay resulting from such circumstances. Neither increased costs of performance of the
terms of this Order nor changed economic circumstances shall be considered as
circumstances beyond the control of BEAI.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
6. If BEAI objects to any disapproval or other decision made by the Division pursuant to this
order, BEAI may notify the Division in writing of its objection within fourteen (14) calendar
days of receipt of the decision and request reconsideration, amendment, or other
modification. -If, within fourteen (14) days following receipt of the request, the Division and
BEAI have not reached mutual agreement regarding the objection raised, the Division will
provide BEAI with a written response to the objection and to BEAI's request.
This Order is effective on this the day of , 1999.
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
0
Michael A. Kelly, Deputy
Division of Waste Manz
HAORDEMBEABIL.
B/E AEROSPACE, INC.
By:
Jifftey P. ltzman
President

BE Aerospace AOC
Attachment E
Schedule of Compliance
74

BE Aerospace AOC
Attacbmnt E: Schedule of Compliance*
Schedule of Compliance
Due Date
Submit a Conceptual Site Model
Initial CSM within ninety (90) calendar days
Paragraph V.E.2.
of issuance of this Order. Updated CStQs as
required by Parties.
Submit Facility Characterization
Within ninety (90) calendar days after
Workplan
receiving notification from the Section that
Paragraph V.G.1.
additional characterization is warranted.
Submit Quarterly Progress Reports
Required when completion of tasks in the
Paragraph V.G.4.
approved Facility Characterization Workplan
will take longer than one year.
Submit Draft Facility
In accordance with a schedule provided in the
Characterization Reports
approved Facility Characterization Workplan.
Paragraph V.H.1.
Submit Final Facilitv
In accordance with a schedule established
Characterization Report
during the Section's review of the Draft
Paragraph V.H.1.
Facilitv Characterization Report.
Submit an amended Facility
Within thirty (30) calendar days after
Monitoring Plan
receiving written notification from the
Paragraph V.I.3.
Section.
Submit Interim Measures Workplan
Due date will accompany notification from
Paragraph V.J.1.
Section that a workplan is required.
Submit Final Interim Measures
Within ninety (90) calendar days of completion
Report
of Interim Measure.
Paragraph V.J.6.
Submit Corrective Action Strategy
Within ninety (90) calendar days after
Paragraph V.K.2.
receiving written approval of the Final
Facility Characterization Report.
Submit Corrective Action Plan
Within sixty (60) calendar days after
Paragraph V.L.3.
receiving written approval of the Corrective
Action Strategy.
Submit information necessary for
Within thirty (30) calendar days after
the Section to commence public
receiving written approval of the Corrective
participation process
Action Plan.
Paragraph V.L.4.
Begin implementation of the
Within ninety (90) calendar days after
Corrective Action Plan
receiving written approval of a modified
Paragraph V.L.5.
Corrective Action Plan.
Notify the Section regarding
As soon as possible, and no later than fifteen
planned physical alterations or
(15) working days after BE Aerospace obtains
additions which may impact HWMU,
knowledge of the physical alterations or
SWMUs, AOCs or other contaminated
additions.
areas
Paragraph VIII.D.
75

BE Aerospace AOC
Schedule of Compliance
Due Date
Report to the Section situations
Communicate orally within twenty-four (24)
that may endanger human health or
hours and follow up with written submittal
the environment
within file (5) working days.
Paragraph VIII.E.
Notify the Section of any newly
Within fifteen (15) calendar days of
discovered SWMUs or AOCs
discovery.
Paragraph `IIII.H.1.
Submit a SWMU Assessment Report for
Within ninety (90) calendar days following
each newly identified SWMU or ACC
notification by the Section.
Paragraph VIII.H.2.
Submit inspection and maintenance
Within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days of
schedule for monitoring and
the effective date of this Order
remedial action systems
Paragraph IX.A.
Submit a personnel training plan for
Within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days of
employees and contractors involved
the effective date of this Order
with environmental monitoring and
remedial action systems
Paragraph IX.B.
Submit cost estimate for the
Within one hundred eighty (180) calendar days
Corrective Actions required by this
after receiving written approval of a modified
Order.
Corrective Action Plan.
Paragraph X.B.
Establish financial assurance for
Within sixty (60) calendar days after receiving
Corrective Action.
written approval of the cost estimate for a
Paragraph X.E.
modified Corrective Action Plan.
Submit a written objection to a
Within fourteen (14) calendar days after receiving
Dispute Decision.
the Dispute Decision from the Section.
Paragraph XIII.
* This Schedule of
this Order.
Schedule is
the Order.
Compliance lists some of the key deadlines established by
This is not a complete list of all due dates. This
intended to summarize and not modify the requirements of
76

APPENDIX II
TABLES
Table 1 - Monitoring Well Construction Summary and Groundwater Elevations
Table 2 - Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 3 - Groundwater Physical Parameters
Table 4 - Surface Water Analytical Results

Table 1 a - Groundwater Elevation Measurements
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Well ID
Total
TIC
1
Screened
Interval
Casing
Depth
Screened
DTW
Elevation
(ft bls)
(ft bls)
Formation
4/2/2012
GW Elev.
MW-1
48.00
949.71
33-48
-
Saprolite
34.71
915.00
MW-3
58.33
938.89
43-58
-
Saprolite
55.55
883.34
MW-4
39.48
950.92
25-50
-
Saprolite
35.35
915.57
MW-5
48.25
951.24
33-48
-
Saprolite
31.40
919.84
MW-6
40.00
950.93
25-40
-
Saprolite
32.12
918.81
MW-7
47.40
916.00
33-48
-
Saprolite
38.38
877.62
MW-8
37.55
945.49
23-38
-
Saprolite
37.28
908.21
MW-9
39.18
951.79
25-40
-
Saprolite
27.44
924.35
MW-10D
68.05
949.32
58-68
55
Bedrock
34.22
915.10
MW-11
37.97
952.39
23-38
-
Saprolite
30.69
921.70
MW-12D
65.00
950.90
55-65
52
Bedrock
32.27
918.63
MW-13
37.15
950.47
22-37
-
Saprolite
36.78
913.69
MW-14D
94.75
938.52
90-95
81
Saprolite
55.03
883.49
MW-15R
45.00
895.17
25-45
-
Saprolite
19.06
876.11
MW-16
59.30
941.40
45-60
-
Saprolite
55.30
886.10
MW-17D
63.20
954.70
53-63
55
Saprolite
32.43
922.27
MW-18
42.85
952.47
28-43
-
Saprolite
34.57
917.90
MW-19
82.45
949.29
73-83
-
Saprolite
35.52
913.77
MW-20
46.57
949.24
32-47
-
Saprolite
36.67
912.57
MW-21D
88.88
940.17
79-89
80
Saprolite
54.93
885.24
MW-22D
154.00
937.10
open borehole
128
Bedrock
54.37
882.73
MW-23
62.05
943.70
47-62
-
Saprolite
55.37
888.33
MW-24
61.75
939.11
47-62
-
Saprolite
54.43
884.68
MW-26D
81.61
950.91
75-85
50
Bedrock
31.62
919.29
MW-27D
68.61
950.36
58-68
45
Bedrock
35.90
914.46
MW-27DD
90.60
950.35
80-90
45
Bedrock
39.12
911.23
MW-28
48.83
944.13
34-49
-
Saprolite
36.51
907.62
MW-29
47.70
950.99
33-48
-
Saprolite
31.52
919.47
MW-30
37.05
951.02
27-37
-
Saprolite
33.16
917.86
MW-32
57.00
942.36
42-57
-
Saprolite
51.52
890.84
MW-33
52.00
948.62
37-52
-
Saprolite
45.25
903.37
RW-3
36.00
904.11
21-36
-
Saprolite
24.66
879.45
- Top of Inner Casing elevations surveyed to NGVD (NAD-27) by Site Design, Inc., January 2001
" - " Not measured
MW-IOD - Monitoring wells constructed using surface casing are designated with "D"
DTW - Depth to Water
1of1

Table 1 b -Groundwater Elevation Measurements
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
TIC
Screened
Casing
Screened
DTW
11/8/2012
GW Elev.
Well ID
Total
Elevation
Interval
Depth
Formation
(ft bls)
(ft bls)
MW-1
48.00
949.71
33-48
-
Saprolite
35.12
914.59
MW-6
40.00
950.93
25-40
-
Saprolite
32.97
917.96
MW-12D
65.00
950.90
55-65
52
Bedrock
33.10
917.80
MW-14D
94.75
938.52
90-95
81
Saprolite
56.45
882.07
MW-15R
45.00
895.17
25-45
-
Saprolite
21.13
874.04
MW-18
42.85
952.47
28-43
-
Saprolite
37.03
915.44
MW-19
82.45
949.29
73-83
-
Saprolite
38.02
911.27
MW-21D
88.88
940.17
79-89
80
Saprolite
55.61
884.56
MW-33
52.00
948.62
37-52
-
Saprolite
45.56
903.06
-I up vi UMV1 %,abtttg cicvauUub butvcycu tv nu v ii Uy anc Lcbtgu, 1M., Jauuaiy Lw!
" - " Not measured
MW-IOD - Monitoring wells constructed using surface casing are designated with "D"
DTW - Depth to Water
1of1

Table 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
cis 1,2
1,4
Vinyl
PCE
TCE
1,1-DCE
1,1,1-TCA
Sample ID
Sample Date
DCE
Diosane
Chloride
UgIL
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
3
7
70
200
7
0.03
MW-1
02/09/96
280
7.6
<
<
<
_
<
05/16/97
280
6.4
<
68
<
<
04/10/01
53
<
<
<
<
<
04/23/02
3900
180
<
1700
<
<
04/09/03
1030
46.4
<
347
<
<
04/19/04
96.5
1.5
<
12.4
<
<
04/27/05
20
<
<
<
<
<
04/05/06
8.4
<
<
<
<
<
03/19/07
3.3
<
<
<
<
<
04/29/08
3.7
<
<
<
<
<
04/21/09
3.4
<
<
<
_
<
04/05/10
2
<
<
<
<
<
1028/10
2.5
<
<
<
<
0124/11
2.6
<
<
<
<
0426/ 11
1.4
<
<
<
<
<
0722/11
3.6
<
<
<
<
<
10/06/11
3.4
<
<
<
<
<
04/03/12
3.5
<
<
<
<
<
0725/12
3.4
<
<
<
<
<
11/08/12
5.9
<
<
<
<
<
MW-3
02/06/96
1400
320
<
<
<
<
05/19/97
940
130
<
<
<
<
0728/99
864
92.4
4.46
11.9
6.4
<
01/05/00
450
110
6
17
<
<
07/10/01
2100
160
52
<
23.0
<
0624/03
901
64.1
79.9
12.7
32.0
<
0420/04
985
61.6
108
14.1
37.4
<
0428/05
900
57
76
<
24
<
04/06/06
2600
<
<
<
<
<
<
03/20/07
1000
85
100
20
19
-
<
04/30/08
890
56
85
17
11
68
<
04/06/10
900
36
43
11
<
-
<
05/03/11
370
38
19
30
1.5
<
04/02/12
640
42
26
25
1.6
<
MW-4
02/06/96
75
<
6.9
<
8.6
<
05/16/97
76
3.4
9.8
<
10
<
0729/99
87.7
3.1
2.5
<
11.5
<
07/10/01
84
<
33
<
12
<
06/24/03
130
5.6
47.2
<
27.4
<
04/19/04
66.2
4.2
30.2
<
6.4
<
0427/05
22
3.2
7.4
<
1.8
<
04/05/06
28
3.1
5
<
<
<
0422/09
26
2.2
5.3
<
<
04/06/10
24
1.9
<
<
<
<
05/03/11
18
1.5
2.1
<
<
<
04/03/12
16
1.4
1.7
<
<
<
MW-5
02/06/96
<
<
<
<
<
<
05/16/97
<
<
<
<
<
<
0729/99
<
2.3
<
<
<
<
07/09/01
<
<
<
<
<
<
08/07/02
<
<
<
<
<
<
06/24/03
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/19/04
1.5
<
<
<
<
<
04/27/05
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/05/06
1.2
<
<
<
<
<
03/19/07
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/29/08
1.9
<
<
<
<
<
04/22/09
<
<
<
<
<
04/05/10
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/27/11
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/03/12
<
<
<
<
<
<
1 ONO M CmIogical Environmental Services, Inc

Table 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
cis 1,2
1,4
Vinyl
PCE
TCE
1,1-DCE
1,1,1-TCA
Sample ID
Sample Date
DCE
Dioaane
Chloride
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
3
7
70
200
7
0.03
MW-6
02/06/96
2000
<
<
<
160
-
<
05/17/97
14000
<
<
<
<
<
04/23/02
720
<
<
<
<
<
04/20/04
6760
19.3
3.1
3.6
10
<
04/27/05
1800
<
<
<
<
<
04/05/06
950
<
<
<
<
<
<
03/20/07
250
<
<
<
<
<
09/12/07
12
<
<
<
<
<
04/30/08
14
<
<
45
<
<
04/22/09
3.2
<
<
36
<
04/06/10
2.2
<
<
26
<
<
10/28/10
190
2.6
1
18
<
<
01/24/11
22
<
<
9.2
<
05/02/11
<
<
<
5.9
<
<
07/22/11
<
<
<
10
<
<
10/06/11
2.2
<
<
7.1
<
<
01/24/12
<
<
<
3.1
<
<
04/02/12
1
<
<
1.9
<
<
07/25/12
<
<
<
1.3
<
<
<
11/08/12
<
<
<
<
<
<
NM-7
02/13/96
<
16
<
<
<
<
07/08/96
2.9
5.9
<
<
1.0
<
05/16/97
3.4
12
<
6.8
<
<
07/29/99
13.3
19.2
<
10.5
<
<
02/11/00
11
17
<
<
1.0
<
07/09/01
<
2.3
<
2.3
<
<
08/07/02
7.9
19.1
1.6
11.3
<
<
06/24/03
6.9
9.9
1.4
5.2
<
<
04/21/04
6.0
12.4
1.1
7.0
<
<
04/28/05
5.6
16
1.3
<
<
<
04/04/06
11
23
1.4
14
<
<
<
03/19/07
13
35
2.7
19
<
<
04/29/08
9
22
1.8
12
<
<
04/23/09
5.5
14
1.6
7.7
<
04/05/10
4.1
8.3
<
4.3
<
<
05/02/11
3.6
10
<
5.9
<
<
04/03/12
3.6
7.2
<
4.3
<
<
MW-8
05/19/97
99
45
<
21
<
<
04/21/04
33.2
7.2
<
2.8
<
<
04/28/05
18
4.6
<
<
<
<
04/04/06
10
3
<
<
<
<
<
MW-9
05/19/97
1.3
<
<
<
<
<
07/29/99
<
<
<
<
<
<
07/09/01
<
<
<
<
<
<
08/07/02
<
<
<
<
<
<
06/24/03
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/19/04
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/27/05
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/05/06
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
03/19/07
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/22/09
<
<
<
<
<
04/29/10
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/26/11
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/03/12
<
<
<
<
<
<
2 of 10 CRB Geological Environmental Services, Inc.

Table 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
PCE
TCE
1,1-DCE
cis 1,2
1,1,1-TCA
1,4
Vinyl
Sample ID
Sample Date
DCE
Dioaane
Chloride
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
3
7
70
200
7
0.03
MW-IOD
05/19/97
4.7
<
<
<
<
-
<
07/29/99
<
<
<
<
<
<
10/12/00
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/10/01
<
<
<
<
<
04/23/02
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/09/03
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/19/04
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/27/05
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/05/06
<
<
<
<
<
<
03/19/07
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/29/08
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/21/09
<
<
<
<
<
04/05/10
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/26/11
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/03/12
<
<
<
<
<
-
<
MW-11
05/19/97
2.1
<
<
15
120
-
<
07/28/99
1.7
<
<
<
20
-
<
07/09/01
<
<
1.1
<
5
-
<
08/07/02
<
<
<
<
2.2
-
<
06/24/03
<
<
<
<
3.3
-
<
04/19/04
1.0
<
<
<
4.4
-
<
04/27/05
<
<
<
<
<
_
<
04/05/06
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
03/19/07
<
<
<
<
1.1
<
04/05/10
7.4
<
<
<
<
<
01/24/11
13
<
<
<
<
04/27/11
7.9
<
<
<
<
<
07/22/11
&7
<
<
<
<
<
10/06/11
2.2
<
<
<
<
<
01/24/12
1.9
<
<
<
<
<
04/03/12
1.2
<
<
<
<
<
MW-12D
05/19/97
4.9
<
1.3
<
6.0
<
07/28/99
109
<
<
<
9.7
<
10/12/00
17
<
<
<
<
<
04/10/01
7.6
<
<
<
<
04/23/02
11
<
<
<
<
<
04/09/03
8.4
<
<
<
<
<
04/20/04
3.8
<
<
<
<
<
04/27/05
15
<
<
<
<
<
04/05/06
6.4
<
<
<
<
<
03/20/07
5
<
<
<
<
<
04/30/08
3.9
<
<
<
<
<
07/23/08
5.8
<
<
<
<
<
11/18/08
8.8
<
<
<
<
04/22/09
2.8
<
<
<
<
04/06/10
3.3
<
<
<
<
<
05/02/11
1.7
<
<
<
<
<
07/22/11
1.8
<
<
<
<
<
04/02/12
1.6
<
<
<
<
<
07/25/12
1
<
<
<
<
_
<
11/08/12
<
<
<
<
<
<
MW-13
05/19/97
7.4
<
<
<
<
<
04/04/06
1.3
<
<
<
<
<
<
03/20/07
1.7
<
<
<
<
<
04/26/11
<
<
<
<
<
<
3 of 10 CRB Geological Environmental Services, Inc.

Table 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
8/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
PCE
TCE
1,1-DCE
cis 1,2
1,1,1-TCA
1,4
Vinyl
Sample ID
Sample Date
DCE
Dioaane
Chloride
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
3
7
70
200
7
0.03
MW-14D
05/19/97
1200
170
<
<
<
-
10/13/00
2000
120
61
<
58
04/10/01
770
67
75
<
55
<
04/23/02
1600
71
100
<
69
<
01/07/00
1050
46.2
109
1.4
56.9
<
04/20/04
1270
38.8
117
1.16
64.9
<
04/27/05
2000
39
100
<
46
<
04/06/06
1700
24
56
<
23
<
<
03/20/07
2400
30
91
4.5
25
79
<
04/30/08
1500
29
61
30
15
<
<
04/23/09
2000
24
57
110
-
110
<
04/06/10
900
31
25
220
5.5
-
<
10128/10
1300
27
22
190
-
140
<
01/24/11
1300
23
17
170
-
<
04125/11
650
<
<
190
<
-
<
08/02/11
1000
19
11
120
<
-
<
10/06/11
1200
17
12
67
1.8
-
<
01/24/12
900
14
<
50
<
-
<
04/04/12
1000
<
<
60
<
-
<
07/26/12
1000
17
10
46
<
-
<
11/08/12
1000
20.0
8.9
45.6
<
-
<
MW-15R
09/26/06
1200
40
70
2
23
-
<
03/20/07
1200
42
81
2
22
58
<
05/01/08
1300
39
83
2.1
17
<
<
04/23/09
1800
38
86
<
-
72
<
03/10/10
1400
26
64
9.8
<
-
<
10128/10
1600
27
51
44
100
<
01/24/11
1100
20
34
44
-
<
05/03/11
940
19
38
50
<
-
<
10/05/11
990
19
32
57
3.4
-
<
01/24/12
"0
19
26
66
<
-
<
04/03/12
890
19
25
69
<
-
<
07/26/12
890
16
18
63
2.2
39
<
11 /08/ 12
817
24.4
25.2
78.6
<
-
<
MW-16
05/19/97
1800
70
120
<
270
-
<
07/28/99
773
<
94.1
<
98
-
<
07/11/01
930
26
54
2.2
62
-
<
06/24/03
1490
25.2
62.6
1.66
49
-
<
04/20/04
1040
16.9
44.4
1.22
27.8
-
<
04/28/05
320
6.9
18
<
11
-
<
04/06/06
40
5.8
9
<
7.1
<
<
03120/07
560
11
20
<
10
<
04/30/08
920
10
16
<
6.7
-
<
04/22/09
680
<
<
<
-
-
<
04/06/10
720
<
<
22
<
-
<
01/24/11
410
3.9
3.4
4.1
-
-
<
05/03/11
310
<
<
<
<
-
<
08/02/11
420
<
<
6.7
<
-
<
04/03/12
290
<
<
8
<
-
<
4 of 10 CRB Ce Io®cal Environmanal Se icm, Inc.

Ug/U7N2
5U.9
7.71
2.57
13.0
2.0
-
<
06/24/03
549
28.3
3.9
26.7
2.5
<
04/19/04
227
45.3
5.6
54.8
2.6
<
04/27/05
190
43
6.3
<
3.1
<
04/05/06
210
36
6
82
<
<
<
03/20/07
98
20
4.6
53
1.3
<
09/12/07
93
33
2.3
30
1.3
<
04/30/08
160
11
1.6
24
<
8.5
<
0423/09
160
11
2.1
23
<
09/02/09
210
25
<
27
<
04/06/10
180
15
2
26
<
<
10/28/10
80
22
1.6
25
23
<
01/24/11
85
13
1.5
25
-
<
05/03/11
86
10
1.7
25
<
-
<
08/02/11
190
19
1.8
41
<
-
<
10/06/11
78
9.8
<
25
<
-
<
01/24/12
91
10
1.2
25
<
-
<
04/03/12
150
16
1.7
34
<
-
<
07/26/12
64
12
1.6
43
<
-
<
11/08/12
131
9.4
<
22.8
<
-
<
MW-19
01/06/00
150
8
48
<
<
-
<
04/10/01
64
<
55
<
23
-
<
04/23/02
220
<
49
<
12
-
<
04/09/03
70
1.33
36.1
<
12.8
-
<
04/19/04
74.5
1.9
36.8
<
10.5
-
<
04/27/05
220
6.5
100
<
16
-
<
04/05/06
180
4.8
100
<
14
110
<
03/20/07
180
3.8
140
1
15
91
<
04/30/08
130
3
130
<
9.3
77
<
04/22/09
120
2.2
110
<
-
100
<
04/06/10
100
1.7
33
<
3.6
-
<
10/28/10
110
2.2
82
<
-
150
<
01/24/11
100
1.6
68
<
-
-
<
05/03/11
65
1.1
49
<
2.2
-
<
08/02/11
85
1.5
64
<
2.7
-
<
10/06/11
83
1.3
53
<
2.1
-
<
01/24/12
37
<
19
<
<
-
<
04/04/12
53
1
30
<
1.4
-
<
07/26/12
56
1.2
42
<
1.6
53
<
11/08/12
29.9
<
29.4
<
<
-
<
5 Of 10 CRB Geological Environmental Services, Inc.

Table 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
$PE Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
cis 1,2
1,4
Vinyl
PCE
TCE
1,1-DCE
1,1,1-TCA
Sample ID
Sample Date
DCE
Dioxaoe
Chloride
AgIL
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
3
7
70
200
7
0.03
MW-20
01/06/00
44
6
11
<
5
-
<
07/10/01
72
7.6
16
<
8.9
<
08/07/02
84.1
5.6
35.8
<
8.0
<
06/24/03
274
7.5
109
1.1
31.2
<
04/19/04
267
5.2
188
1.0
24.3
<
04/27/05
250
6.4
220
<
31
<
04/05/06
150
<
120
<
<
<
<
03/20/07
230
5.8
220
1.2
22
<
04/30/08
210
5.8
270
1.2
15
<
04/22/09
140
4.4
130
<
-
<
04/06/10
35
2.6
8.4
<
<
<
05/03/11
49
3
36
<
1.7
<
04/03/12
64
3.2
31
<
1.4
<
MW-21D
01/05/00
1200
68
170
<
180
<
07/10/01
2200
70
190
1.9
150
<
08/07/02
1480
39.2
140
11.9
96
<
06/24/03
1090
26.5
121
<
89
<
04/20/04
1580
34.9
139
1.3
67.3
<
04/27/05
1700
26
91
<
49
<
04/05/06
5600
<
<
<
<
<
<
03/20/07
2200
18
50
7.4
16
240
<
04/30/08
1200
12
21
8
6.6
110
<
04/22/09
880
<
<
<
-
83
<
04/06/10
14M
<
<
<
<
-
<
10/28/10
1600
9.9
6.8
21
110
<
01/24/11
1500
13
6.6
26
-
<
05/03/11
970
<
<
26
<
-
<
08/02/11
1300
12
<
37
<
-
<
10/06/11
1300
13
3.8
37
<
-
<
01/24/12
1300
18
<
62
<
-
<
04/04/12
800
15
<
68
<
-
<
07/26/12
1100
13
3.7
69
<
43
<
11/08/12
1060
24.4
<
76.9
<
-
<
MW-22D
01/05/00
570
55
20
<
50
-
<
07/11/01
200
8.1
3.5
1.3
2.5
-
<
08/07/02
941
26.3
42.3
11.9
28.7
-
<
06/24/03
<
<
<
<
<
-
<
04/20/04
<
<
<
<
<
-
<
04/27/05
<
<
<
<
<
-
<
04/06/06
<
<
<
2.6
<
<
<
04/30/08
38
2.9
11
87
<
<
04/22/09
31
<
<
6.2
<
04/04/12
190
17
2.3
130
<
<
07/26/12
38
11
<
58
<
<
MW-23
01/06/00
1200
29
130
<
150
<
02/11/00
1200
<
130
<
110
<
07/10/01
1000
22
62
<
63
<
06/24/03
465
9
43.8
<
33
<
04/20/04
440
6.73
30.9
<
19.7
<
04/28/05
770
8
16
<
11
<
04/05/06
680
<
<
<
<
<
<
03/20/07
920
7.1
9.8
<
5.7
81
<
04/30/08
1000
6.2
7
<
2.6
-
<
04/22/09
320
<
12
680
-
0.019
04/06/10
93
<
<
400
<
<
05/03/11
18
1.4
2.4
450
<
6.4
04/04/12
7.7
<
<
200
<
-
<
6 of 10 CRB Geological Environmental Services, Inc.

Table 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
cis 1,2
1,4
Vinyl
Sample ID
Sample Date
PCE
TCE
1,1-DCE
DCE
1,1,1-TCA
Dioaane
Chloride
VRIL
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
3
7
70
200
7
0.03
MW-24
01/06/00
1100
67
66
<
52
-
<
0426/00
1500
87
68
<
57
<
07/10/01
930
55
61
3.4
39
<
08/07/02
620
38
49
6.3
25
<
0624/03
802
55
57
16
24
<
0420/04
1040
85
48
13
13
<
0428/05
530
66
38
<
9.9
<
04/06/06
510
44
29
20
<
<
<
0320/07
610
56
46
21
11
<
04/30/08
570
42
22
13
5.2
<
0422/09
520
21
12
11
-
<
04/06/10
560
26
12
12
<
<
05/03/11
460
13
8.1
9.7
1.7
<
04/04/12
490
23
<
15
<
<
MW-26D
01/05/00
10
<
<
<
<
<
07/10/01
1.8
<
<
<
<
<
08/07/02
<
<
<
<
<
<
0624/03
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/19/04
<
<
<
<
<
<
0427/05
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/05/06
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0320/07
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/30/08
<
<
<
<
<
<
0422/09
<
<
<
<
<
04/06/10
<
<
<
<
<
<
05/02/11
35
3.1
<
5
<
<
0722/11
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/02/12
<
<
<
<
<
<
MW-27D
01/06/00
8
<
<
<
<
<
07/09/01
4.5
1.5
<
<
<
<
08/07/02
3.9
1.0
<
<
<
<
0624/03
2.1
<
<
<
<
<
0420/04
3.4
<
<
<
<
<
0428/05
1.5
<
<
<
<
<
04/04/06
2.2
<
<
<
<
<
<
0320/07
2.9
<
<
<
<
1.7
05/01/08
2.7
<
<
<
<
<
0423/09
2.6
<
<
<
<
04/07/10
2.2
<
<
<
<
<
0426/11
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/03/12
<
<
<
<
<
<
MW-27DD
07/09/01
<
1.4
<
<
<
<
08/07/02
<
<
<
1.08
<
<
0624/03
<
<
<
<
<
<
0420/04
<
<
<
<
<
<
0428/05
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/04/06
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0320/07
1.2
1.1
<
<
<
<
0422/09
1.3
<
<
<
<
04/07/10
<
<
<
<
<
<
0426/11
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/03/12
<
<
<
<
<
<
7 of 10 CRB Geological Environmental Services, Inc.

Table 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
PCE
TCE
1,1-DCE
cis 1,2
1,1,1-TCA
1,4
Vinyl
Sample tD
Sample Date
DCE
Dio:ane
Chloride
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
3
7
70
200
7
0.03
MW-28
01/06/00
13
<
<
<
<
-
<
07/09/01
16
5.2
1.6
<
2.0
<
04/23/02
18
6.6
<
1.2
1.7
<
06/24/03
48.2
11.4
9.5
<
7.1
<
04/21/04
24.1
5.3
2.4
<
2.5
<
04/28/05
5
1.2
<
<
<
<
04/04/06
6.1
1.3
<
<
<
<
<
03/19/07
5.5
1.3
<
<
<
<
04/29/08
6.1
1.2
<
<
<
<
04/22/09
3.8
<
<
<
<
04/05/10
9.1
1.8
<
<
<
<
04/26/11
S.8
1.5
<
<
<
<
04/03/12
4.5
<
<
<
<
<
MW-29
01/05/00
350
6
7
<
16
<
02/11/00
280
7.4
8.9
<
19
<
07/10/01
360
7.7
4.6
3.2
9.1
<
08/07/02
250
5.9
<
1.7
10.4
<
06/24/03
1410
11.7
7.9
1.9
13.8
<
04/19/04
1410
7.4
3.5
1.8
5.58
<
04/27/05
1200
<
<
<
<
<
04/05/06
620
<
<
<
<
<
<
03/20/07
550
3.9
<
2.1
<
<
04/30/08
58
<
<
<
<
<
04/22/09
180
<
<
100
<
04/06/10
120
<
<
62
<
<
05/02/11
13
<
<
54
<
<
04/02/12
13
<
<
20
<
<
MW-30
01/05/00
3400
39
38
<
120
<
04/26/00
8100
<
<
<
<
<
04/10/01
2900
25
21
<
_
<
04/09/03
7450
48.9
10.2
4.0
36.5
<
04/20/04
14200
55.6
9.5
7.5
29.9
<
04/27/05
3900
<
<
<
<
<
04/05/06
5500
15
<
<
<
<
<
03/20/07
1500
4.7
<
1.5
1.4
<
09/12/07
170
<
16
<
<
<
04/30/08
40
<
<
<
<
<
04/22/09
21
<
<
3.0
<
04/06/10
24
<
<
8.2
<
<
05/02/11
53
1.1
<
16
<
<
01/24/12
48
1.1
<
46
<
<
04/02/12
22
1
<
19
<
<
MW-32
03/31/00
48
21
<
<
<
<
07/10/01
27
13
<
<
<
<
04/28/05
23
5.8
<
<
<
<
04/04/06
41
5.8
<
1.3
<
<
<
03/20/07
32
6.5
<
1.9
<
<
04/29/08
20
4.2
<
13
<
<
04/23/09
14
2.5
<
<
<
04/06/10
18
3.1
<
<
<
<
05/02/11
17
1.6
<
<
<
<
04/04/12
9.9
1.1
<
<
<
<
8 of 10 CRB Geological EnvironmenW Services. Inc.

Table 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
cis 1,2
1,4
Vinyl
Sample ID
Sample Date
PCE
TCE
1,1-DCE
DCE
1,1,1-TCA
Diosane
Chloride
aWL
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
3
7
70
200
7
0.03
MW-33
03/31/00
55
<
<
<
<
_
<
04/10/01
17
<
<
<
<
04/23/02
15
1.2
<
<
<
<
04/09/03
7.2
<
<
<
<
<
04/20/04
24
<
<
<
<
<
04/28/05
43
<
<
<
<
<
04/04/06
46
1
<
<
<
<
03/20/07
36
<
<
<
<
<
04/30/08
10
<
<
<
<
<
04/23/09
10
<
<
<
<
04/07/10
6.9
<
<
<
<
<
01/24/11
14
<
<
<
<
<
04/27/11
5
<
<
<
<
<
07/22/11
7.8
<
<
<
<
<
10/06/11
6
<
<
<
<
<
01/24/12
6.3
<
<
<
<
<
04/03/12
5.2
<
<
<
<
<
07/25/12
5.1
<
<
<
<
<
11/08/12
5.7
<
<
<
<
<
RW-1
03/31/00
2500
27
19
<
64
<
10/12/00
5500
<
<
<
<
<
07/11/01
1500
<
<
<
<
<
10/18/02
1030
7.21
4.9
<
10.6
-
<
06/24/03
4150
17.8
8.3
2.0
18
-
<
04/20/04
6740
1700
30
89
4.6
120
3.7
<
15.5
89
-
-
<
<
RW-2
03/31/00
10/12/00
2200
<
160
<
120
-
<
07/11/01
2000
<
180
<
<
_
<
08/07/02
1710
56.7
136
1.6
99
-
<
06/24/03
1250
43.9
45.3
<
72.8
-
<
RW-3
03/31/00
140
22
<
16
<
_
<
10/12/00
280
27
1.1
16
1.2
-
<
07/11/01
160
25
<
20
<
-
<
08/06/02
171
19.9
<
19.4
<
-
<
06/24/03
190
22.4
2.4
22.3
<
-
<
04/21/04
164
18
1.1
19.4
<
-
<
04/28/05
100
12
<
<
<
-
<
04/06/06
75
7.9
<
14
<
<
<
03/20/07
140
13
<
20
<
<
05/01/08
91
8.6
<
1.5
<
<
04/23/09
89
6.8
<
11
<
04/06/10
46
4.6
<
6.8
<
<
08/02/11
34
3
<
3.7
<
<
04/03/12
28
2.7
<
3.4
<
<
B-2
03/20/07
3
<
1
<
<
<
C-3
04/06/10
4
<
<
<
<
-
<
04/04/12
43
1.0
20
20
<
<
C-4
04/30/08
68
4.5
18
2.8
<
13
<
9 of 10 CRB Geological Environmental Services, Inc.

Table 2 - Historic Groundwater Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, Notch Carolina
PCE
TCE
1,1-DCE
cis 1,2
1,1,1-TCA
1,4
Vinyl
Sample ID
Sample Date
DCE
Diozaoe
Chloride
NC 2L GW Standard
0.7
3
7
70
200
7
0.03
C-5
12/12/06
59
<
<
<
<
<
<
04/06/10
1000
<
<
<
<
<
04/04/12
47
<
<
<
<
<
C-8
04/06/10
24
<
<
15
<
-
<
C-9
04/06/10
990
<
e
75
<
-
<
04/04/12
1100
<
<
270
<
-
<
C-11
07/25/06
290
2.2
<
1.1
1.3
-
<
12/12/06
5
<
<
<
<
<
<
03/20/07
69
<
<
<
<
<
04/30/08
14
1
<
1.7
<
<
D-2
10/06/11
360
<
84
19
<
<
D-3
10/06/11
5
<
<
5.8
<
<
D-5
07/25/06
390
2.4
2
<
2.4
<
03/20/07
190
<
<
6.7
<
-
<
04/30/08
6
<
<
35
<
43
<
D-7
07/25/06
3700
13
5
2.6
6.6
-
<
12/12/06
1700
11
4.9
1.6
2.9
<
<
03/20/07
2400
10
<
<
<
_
<
04/30/08
1200
46
4
750
<
23
7.2
04/22/09
110
<
<
2000
-
-
28
04/06/10
65
<
<
580
<
<
10/06/11
82
<
<
87
<
1.9
04/04/12
18
<
<
110
<
-
<
D-11
04/07/10
1.3
<
<
<
<
<
F-2
12/13/06
21
3.9
21
1.2
2.2
<
<
03/20/07
21
6.2
18
1.7
<
1.6
F-3
12/13/06
7.2
<
<
<
<
<
<
F4
04/05/12
15
1.8
<
3.7
<
<
<-Below Detection Limits TCE-Tricbloroethene TCA-Tnchloroethane
(D)-Duplicate Sample DCE-Dichloroethene PCE-Tetrachloroethene
NC 2L-North Carolina Title 15 A Subchapter 2L Groundwater Quality Standards.
Historic detections of other compounds below water quality standards are not displayed
10 Of 10 CRB Geological Environmental Services, Inc.

Table 3 - Groundwater Physical Parameters
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
MW ID
Sample
pH
DO
ORP
Conductivity
Date
ppm
mV
us
MW 1
4/5/2006
7.3
2.2
60
31
9/25/2006
5.6
3.5
301
-
3/20/2007
7.6
-
40
34
4/29/2008
7.3
-
-170
5
4/21/2009
6.2
7.5
125
41
4/5/2010
7.6
2.8
76
35
1/24/2011
5.9
5.7
250
75
7/22/2011
6.6
0.0
28
53
10/6/2011
5.6
-
184
28
4/3/2012
6.6
6.8
60
32
7/25/2012
6.5
6.8
121
28
11/8/2012
5.9
6.3
86
27
MW3
4/6/2006
5.5
-
381
69
9/25/2006
4.9
2.1
419
-
3/20/2007
5.9
-
350
66
4/30/2008
5.3
-
249
73
4/5/2010
5.6
0.6
238
96
5/3/2011
4.5
-
-
84
4/2/2012
4.3
2.3
160
103
MW4
4/5/2006
6.2
5.9
101
140
9/25/2006
5.3
4.8
280
-
4/21/2009
7.3
4.6
215
154
4/5/2010
6.6
5.6
117
150
4/3/2012
6.6
3.2
96
164
M W 5
4/5/2006
6.3
5.3
64
103
3/20/2007
6.2
-
151
99
4/29/2008
4.6
-
89
85
4/21/2009
6.8
0.1
-57
437
4/52010
6.2
0.5
-55
300
4/32012
6.6
0.4
-4
176
MW6
4/52006
5.0
9.1
160
277
9252006
5.0
4.2
190
-
9/122007
5.1
0.5
-170
195
4/302008
6.8
-
-80
195
4222009
6.6
1.1
-111
950
4/52010
6.7
2.2
-93
1325
1242011
5.7
0.3
-70
509
7222011
3.8
0.0
-122
628
10/62011
5.9
-
-33
360
124/2012
5.9
1.1
-69
400
422012
6.0
2.4
-205
242
7/25/2012
6.5
2.0
-25
272
11/8/2012
6.4
2.1
-50
200
MW7
4/4/2006
6.7
8.8
51
77
320/2007
6.3
-
123
78
4292008
7.9
-
175
123
4/21/2009
5.4
7.7
176
94
4/52010
6.8
9.4
124
88
5/22011
4.2
-
-
111
4/32012
6.6
7.8
89
136
Page 1 of 7

Table 3 - Groundwater Physical Parameters
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
MW ID
Sample
pH
DO
ORP
Conductivity
Date
ppm
my
us
MW8
4/4/2006
-
-
-
MW9
4/5/2006
6.8
108
19
3/20/2007
6.3
-
188
20
4/21/2009
6.0
7.7
172
32
4/52010
5.7
9.0
106
39
4/262011
-
-
-
-
4/32012
6.9
9.0
155
53
MW lOD
4/52006
7.2
-
-26
143
3/202007
11.4
-170
327
4292008
9.5
-
-310
218
4212009
10.3
3.5
67
202
4/52010
7.7
1.2
-7
353
4/32012
7.0
6.4
-18
206
MW 11
4/5/2006
5.4
-
189
46
3202007
5.7
-
115
56
922009
5.2
5.7
18
763
4/52010
5.8
0.5
-50
1296
1/242011
5.0
1.3
-49
554
7222011
5.6
-
-51
750
10/62011
5.0
-
33
635
1242012
8.1
2.1
10
499
4/32012
5.8
1.7
60
560
MW 12D
4/52006
7.3
5.8
82
46
9252006
5.5
3.2
308
-
3202007
7.5
-
28
41
4/302008
6.0
-
103
37
4212009
6.5
7.0
200
49
4/52010
6.7
8.3
125
58
7222011
5.3
1.5
134
67
42/2012
6.6
9.2
54
74
7252012
6.3
9.0
110
79
11/82012
6.3
8.1
125
85
MW 13
4/42006
8.8
8.6
2
173
3202007
10.8
-
101
221
MW 14D
4/6/2006
5.5
-
127
107
925/2006
5.2
4.9
291
-
9/122007
7.3
6.5
123
108
4292008
5.7
-
107
176
4222009
5.5
2.8
150
129
4/52010
5.9
0.8
227
160
1242011
4.7
0.1
94
136
4252011
4.9
-
-
150
82/2011
5.0
0.0
140
112
10/62011
5.3
-
129
130
t/242012
6.l
2.8
192
135
4/4/2012
6.7
3.0
77
127
7/262012
6.8
5.5
133
107
11/8/2012
6.0
4.3
159
126
Page 2 of 7

Table 3 - Groundwater Physical Parameters
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
MW ID
Sample
pH
DO
ORP
Conductivity
Date
ppm
mV
us
MW 15R
3/20/2007
6.7
-
105
104
4/9/2007
-
-
77
17
1/15/2008
5.8
5.1
63
111
5/l/2008
6.9
-
-60
101
7/23/2008
62
7.3
185
120
11/18/2008
6.2
5.5
200
223
4/22/2009
6.7
5.8
132
117
1/24/2011
5.1
3.7
201
137
10/5/2011
5.7
-
198
142
1/24/2012
7.3
2.9
198
128
4/3/2012
6.1
2.9
100
125
7/26/2012
7.2
3.0
94
116
11/8/2012
6.1
2.6
144
134
MW 16
4/6/2006
5.9
-
118
120
9/25/2006
5.0
-
330
-
12/13/2006
4.8
4.0
267
87
3/20/2007
6.2
-
220
108
9/122007
6.2
5.0
50
70
4/302008
5.8
-
218
107
4222009
5 5
4.6
246
145
4/52010
6.3
4.7
162
136
1242011
4.7
4.2
138
128
5/32011
5.1
-
-
122
822011
5.5
0.0
109
115
4/32012
9.9
4.2
60
113
MW 17D
4/52006
6.3
4.5
60
101
3/202007
6.4
-
59
90
4/292008
4.6
-
86
79
4212009
5.1
0.4
174
85
4/52010
5.2
0.8
97
131
1242011
4.8
1.5
150
218
4/32012
6.4
0.7
146
85
MW18
4/52006
6.1
4.6
74
75
9252006
4.9
3.2
314
-
12/122006
6.9
-
255
-
3/202007
6.4
-
17
63
9/122007
5.2
1.9
-115
44
4/302008
5.5
-
106
61
4212009
4.6
1.3
247
77
4/52010
5.8
0.9
216
97
1242011
4.0
1.5
115
180
5/32011
4.1
-
-
100
822011
5.2
0.0
133
123
10/62011
5.1
-
167
105
1242012
7.4
0.6
-21
106
4/32012
7.0
0.9
175
87
7262012
6.1
3.6
163
95
11/82012
5.9
1.8
116
130
Page 3 of 7

Table 3 - Groundwater Physical Parameters
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
MW ID
Sample
pH
DO
ORP
Conductivity
Date
ppm
mV
us
MW19
4/5/2006
6.6
6.1
109
208
9/25/2006
5.9
3.2
224
-
12/12/2006
6.3
-
-50
182
3/20/2007
6.9
-
-62
160
9/122007
5.9
3.2
-110
115
1/152008
6.1
2.4
35
175
4/302008
6.2
-
190
183
7/232008
6.2
4.9
93
218
11/182008
6.1
3.2
220
220
4212009
6.7
4.1
161
203
4/5/2010
6.7
3.4
130
129
1242011
5.6
2.9
30
198
5/3/2011
6.3
-
-
190
822011
6.3
0.0
77
191
10/62011
5.8
-
147
196
1242012
5.7
3.5
190
202
4/42012
9.0
4.3
-15
184
7262012
6.5
4.6
150
188
11/82012
6.5
3.5
40
197
MW20
4/52006
6.4
8.8
107
74
9252006
5.1
5.1
313
-
3202007
6.1
-
72
101
4/302008
5.2
-
205
107
4212009
5.4
1.7
213
122
4/52010
6.4
1.5
63
85
5/32011
5.6
-
-
120
4/32012
7.2
1.0
158
139
MW21D
4/5/2006
6.2
8.0
125
116
9252006
5.3
4.8
291
-
9/122007
7.2
5.3
110
120
4/302008
6.0
-
228
123
4222009
6.5
6.3
201
145
4/52010
6.3
5.0
186
139
1242011
4.9
4.1
70
146
5/32011
5.2
-
-
150
822011
5.1
0.0
105
158
10/62011
5.6
-
127
149
1242012
8.1
3.9
62
159
4/42012
5.7
4.9
91
145
7262012
7.4
5.2
193
133
11/82012
5.6
3.8
188
143
MW22D
4/62006
-
-
-
-
4/302008
7.6
-
-106
33
4222009
9.0
0.1
-67
58
4/3/2012
8.2
0.7
-2
37
7/262012
7.6
0.7
-53
78
Page 4 of 7

Table 3 - Groundwater Physical Parameters
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
MW ID
Sample
pH
DO
ORP
Conductivity
Date
ppm
mV
us
MW23
4/52006
6.1
127
90
320/2007
6.4
112
109
4/30/2008
6.0
106
118
9M009
5.4
-
186
691
4/5/2010
5.8
0.03
65
550
4/4/2012
8.4
1.60
40
457
MW24
4/62006
5.6
2.3
124
55
9/252006
-
0.9
297
-
320/2007
5.9
-
71
83
4/302008
5.4
-
249
83
4222009
5.0
0.8
228
109
4/52010
5.8
0.7
235
101
5/32011
4.3
-
-
88
4/42012
7.0
1.0
40
91
MW25
4/62006
6.3
-
108
77
3202007
6.4
-
72
55
MW26D
4/52006
6.1
6.7
138
85
3202007
7.7
-
100
55
4/302008
6.5
-
50
53
4212009
7.4
3.6
165
65
4/52010
7.0
3.4
107
68
52R011
5.3
-
-
59
722/1011
5.2
0.0
-22
70
422012
6.6
5.3
32
75
MW27D
4/42006
12.5
4.8
-55
331
3202007
14.0
-
-92
1290
4232009
7.8
3.8
73
24
4/52010
11.5
4.8
13
919
4/32012
11.6
6.8
-107
494
MW27DD
4/42006
8.9
1.7
-30
231
3202007
8.6
-
62
220
4232009
7.4
3.9
75
212
4/52010
6.7
4.4
154
251
4/32012
10.0
0.7
-300
275
MW28
4/42006
5.5
4.8
119
135
3202007
5.8
-
235
101
4292008
4.6
-
118
107
4212009
5.0
3.6
161
1464
4/52010
5.1
4.1
225
163
4/32012
6.3
5.8
165
150
MW29
4/52006
5.7
-
145
103
9252006
4.7
6.3
315
-
3202007
6.2
-
14
86
4/302008
6.9
-
40
405
422/2009
4.7
0.4
-6
3015
4/52010
5.6
-
13
1680
Page 5 of 7

Table 3 - Groundwater Physical Parameters
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
MW ID
Sample
pH
DO
ORP
Conductivity
Date
ppm
mV
us
MW30
4/5/2006
5.9
6.2
139
79
9/25/2006
5.0
6.5
366
-
3/20/2007
6.3
-
139
74
9/12/2007
3.8
0.1
160
390
4/22/2009
4.3
0.8
28
1300
4/5/2010
5.4
2.5
51
1094
1/24/2012
6.8
2.5
40
371
4/2/2012
4.2
5.3
14
372
MW32
4/4/2006
6.2
-
99
42
3/20/2007
6.3
40
47
4/29/2008
4.3
83
46
4/23/2009
5.8
-
179
54
4/5/2010
5.7
5.0
216
57
5/2/2011
4.2
-
-
164
4/4/2012
8.6
0.7
-184
45
MW33
4/4/2006
6.8
-
105
59
320/2007
9.0
-23
263
4292008
7.1
-
-31
71
4232009
6.3
5.6
142
64
4/52010
10.5
6.7
49
106
1242011
5.1
4.0
210
80
7222011
5.4
0.0
174
74
10/62011
6.9
-
150
76
1242012
7.1
5.2
124
82
4/32012
10.3
4.0
-110
106
7252012
6.4
5.2
150
84
11/82012
6.2
4.3
163
82
RW-3
4/62006
6.5
5.9
174
62
3202007
6.4
-
142
56
5/l2008
6.2
4.5
-53
57
4232009
6.2
3.0
127
660
4/52010
6.1
4.5
225
66
822011
4.7
0.0
152
64
4/32012
7.1
4.9
102
61
A-1
12/122006
6.0
-
-120
-
B-2
3/202007
6.3
-
-108
403
C-2
9252006
5.4
1.3
111
-
C-3
4/52010
6.2
0.0
-81
108
10/62011
5.9
-
-30
2282
4/42012
6.6
1.5
-293
777
C-4
4/302008
5.9
-
-178
292
C-5
4/42012
6.0
1.3
40
500
Page 6 of 7

Table 3 - Groundwater Physical Parameters
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
lW ID
Sample
pH
DO
ORP
Conductivity
Date
ppm
mV
us
C-8
4/5/2010
5.7
1.1
35
243
C-9
4/4/2012
5.2
0.4
-317
3660
C-11
7/25/2006
6.8
-
111
82
12/12/2006
4.9
39
272
3/20/2007
5.6
-
-7
484
D-1
3/20/2007
6.5
-150
210
D-2
10/6/2011
5.8
-
-99
2470
D-3
10/6/2011
5.9
-
113
206
D-5
7/25/2006
6.5
-
34
177
3/20/2007
5.9
-
-3
850
4/30/2008
5.7
-
-35
731
D-7
7/25/2006
7.3
-
106
83
12/12/2006
6.1
-
-125
-
3/20/2007
6.7
-
-183
253
4/30/2008
5.7
0.2
-153
1027
11/18/2008
5.9
0.2
-108
1978
10/6/2011
5.7
-
16
-
4/4/2012
6.2
0.9
-85
992
D-11
4/5/2010
6.9
-
161
121
F-2
12/13/2006
4.6
-
145
360
3/20/2007
5.7
-
120
379
F-3
12/13/2006
4.3
-
219
237
F-4
4/5/2012
8.1
2.3
-120
270
AC-2
3/20/2007
6.7
-
-15
130
AC-3
3/20/2007
5.7
95
54
Page 7 of 7

Table 4 - Historic Surface Water Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Sample ID
Sample Location
Sample Date
PCE
TCE
1,1-DCE
cis 1,2
DCE
NCDWQ 2B Surface Water Standard
3.3
30
3.2
-
BESS-1
Distant Upstream Flow
10/13/00
1.1
<
<
<
10/5/11
1.7
<
<
<
BESS-2
Distant Upstream Flow
10/13/00
1.2
<
<
<
1015111
<
<
<
<
BESS-3
Distant Upstream Discharge
10/13/00
1.5
<
<
<
1015111
1.1
<
<
<
BESS-4
Near Upstream Flow
10/13/00
<
<
<
<
11/10/00
<
<
<
<
10/ 18/02
1.4
<
<
<
10/14/03
<
<
<
<
10/22/04
2.7
<
<
<
12/1/05
<
<
<
-
9/26/06
<
<
<
<
9/2/09
<
<
<
<
1015111
<
<
<
<
11/8/12
<
<
<
<
BESS-5
Stream Flow in Expected
10/13/00
2.3
<
<
<
11/10/00
6.9
1.2
<
<
Groundwater Discharge Area
10/18/01
<
<
<
<
10/ 18/02
1.3
<
<
<
10/14/03
7.1
<
<
<
10/22/04
2.0
<
<
<
12/1/05
1.2
<
<
-
9/26/06
<
<
<
<
511108
4.0
<
<
<
11/18/08
1.2
<
<
<
9/2/09
<
<
<
<
10/28/10
5.1
<
<
<
1015111
1.0
<
<
<
11/8/12
<
<
<
<
1of2

Table 4 - Historic Surface Water Analytical Results
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
cis 1,2
Sample ID
Sample Location
Sample Date
PCE
TCE
1,1-DCE
DCE
NCDWQ 2B Surface Water Standard
3.3
30
3.2
-
BESS-6
Outcrop Seep in Expected
10/13/00
350
63
<
<
Groundwater Discharge Area
11/10/00
270
44
<
<
10/18/01
140
25
<
9.3
10/18/02
121
17.5
6.9
<
10/14/03
55.7
10.3
1.8
1.4
10/22/04
2
<
<
<
12/1/05
94
13
7.6
-
9/26/06
58
9.3
8.1
<
10/8/07
170
17
20
<
11/18/08
46
5
4.5
<
9/2/09
13
2
1.2
<
10/28/10
70
5
9.5
<
1015111
22
1
2.7
<
11/8/12
198
15.3
29.1
<
BESS-7
Near Downstream Flow
10/13/00
14
6.5
<
<
10/18/01
7.7
6.5
<
<
10/18/02
14.4
3.7
<
<
10/14/03
2.5
<
<
<
10/22/04
10
2.9
<
<
12/l/05
11
3.0
<
-
9/26/06
11
3.6
<
-
11/18/08
12
2.3
<
<
9/2/09
2.7
<
<
<
1015111
5.5
<
<
<
11/8/12
<
<
<
<
BESS-8
Distant Downstream Flow
10/13/00
3.8
3.0
<
<
11/10/00
4.2
2.6
<
1.1
10/18/01
5.0
4.6
<
<
10/18/02
6.6
3.5
<
1.4
10/14/03
3.0
1.7
<
<
10/22/04
7.0
2.4
<
1.3
12/1/05
5.5
2.4
<
-
10/8/07
3.7
1.5
<
<
9/2/09
5.9
2.0
<
<
1015111
4.4
1.3
<
<
Notes:
PCE - Tetrachloroethylene c-1,2-DCE - cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
TCE - Trichloroethene 1,1-DCE-1,1-Dichloroethene
"<" - Below detection limits -" not analyzed
2 of 2

an2231011►;flll
FIGURES
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Site Map
Figure 3 - Site Topographic Map
Figure 4 - Regional Cross -Section Locator Map
Figure 5 - Regional Hydrogeologic Cross -Section C-C'
Figure 6 - Site and Surrounding Area Map
Figure 7 - Surface Water Sampling Locations
Figure 8 - Site Geological Cross Section Locator Map
Figure 9 - Site Cross Section A -A'
Figure 10 - Site Cross Section B-B'
Figure 11 - Site Cross Section C-C'
Figure 12 - Site Generalized Cross Section D-D'
Figure 13 - Bedrock Elevation Contour Map
Figure 14 - Groundwater Elevation Contour Map, April 2, 2012
Figure 15 - Underground Drainage Layout
Figure 16 - Soil Gas Sampling Locations
Figure 17 - PCE in Soil Gas — May 1997
Figure 18 - PCE in Groundwater
Figure 19 - Remediation Areas

APPENDIX III
FIGURES
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Site Map
Figure 3 - Site Topographic Map
Figure 4 - Regional Cross -Section Locator Map
Figure 5 - Regional Hydrogeologic Cross -Section C-C'
Figure 6 - Site and Surrounding Area Map
Figure 7 - Surface Water Sampling Locations
Figure 8 - Site Geological Cross Section Locator Map
Figure 9 - Site Cross Section A -A'
Figure 10 - Site Cross Section B-B'
Figure 11 - Site Cross Section C-C'
Figure 12 - Site Generalized Cross Section D-D'
Figure 13 - Bedrock Elevation Contour Map
Figure 14 - Groundwater Elevation Contour Map, April 2, 2012
Figure 15 - Underground Drainage Layout
Figure 16 - Soil Gas Sampling Locations
Figure 17 - PCE in Soil Gas — May 1997
Figure 18 - PCE in Groundwater
Figure 19 - Remediation Areas

FIGURE SITE LOCATION MAP
7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - WALKERTOWN
1 B/E AEROSPACE, INC.
1455 FAIRCHILD ROAD
WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA CBB

TN nst�rkt caniaYra MM1 b confkkrwt I
ud ro ;- of . = be npr U" d111eut Yr
amrta�d 111'tktRl P� of CRl Goleploet � Fflvi'onlenld SwM", iflG
LEGEND
NW -I 0 MDQTURZNG WELL
----PROPERTY SGIlmARY
---------FENCE
SEVER LDE
AV%iLT
I
I
1
I BUdDD6 3
i
i I
E 1
jE 1
1
1
f 1
t ti
I
1
1
1
1
IMM M 3A
I
I i
i
Al�RLi
-.t i pYStDi
I it
f � ' `MR111111T/JOOIR
._ twtE mOlAtt AffA
1
1
i
i 1
I
FAIRCWILD ROrcosm AD
� UNIMMMo
�>nsLNG
TitN4=
SCAM w FM
ASFwLT
rA7OM
U
HUD.DDIG lA
►w
S IIIMAOR
'�Iv-i' fIw tri
uax�xs�
SEG'TH REYWOM
AIRPORT
TEST
/ FACllITY
--- SMITH REYNOLM
I \aa ADZPOtT
D
t �
i \I
I �
I �
t \I
1
1
t I ICED
I LAND
I
1
t
I
1
1
f ;
1 /
-- D �G
ADWQtT
U7
am 11Ar W
SGRLEI fRD GEM MCA OI i ENVDIEMTAL SEAVM, DEC L12M K — E A WELL LQATotS mm IMSPAmc n D Ram
XDB r
AERM E�TOGRAM 1"4 vRalml- EM,ia�m C�AI�RIA
ab" ow low i ITT a � FIGU
M.4 FWII& Sum ttrlol in L wrww TIirM Imo Z
agnr°weama emo ML
ftw w tw�..� Msrwrw F�c1wtMLr.�erv�M ftm w .... WA ..41—

t
f•
J
_ b '
71
i�%�� \ (\•-r'A.
........_..',%'l /`\,-. ry J`.r` ;c . i 11• 'iir`;i ✓ --„� 11•� t a .^-�.._; /:.- ```,,.
ipj
. .�r..� �._7/, `"'/`...(/. t ! •�•\\���\.' {... .. � .'-�"i� �J ... 't �le I __ r /ji `i`;,,1; ; �9r59 rrrr ``\.
.; /-�,jj � �\. � rr�{`/% �-..♦\\� ��(i. ;ji�r' �"-- i _..,1.._ �� riJ� ix
i� X� �/ _ tt � ±t �::Y�; �� - ♦�•'!� � - ; �`r .. '�..�♦
..._.,�!•'":� ,\, �:_-.-; �---r---' \ }t �;/tom � �r � ..,�f ; ; ♦
\•=�>\ �•t., r `...__.^-'�';:�ih;�;:;.� nax,r .• ir"•;...__,j,�f 'ir � ``\t���r-^j'.c�2�= �� '.
\\ :.r./♦, �f� `'� •♦` '�.\` -- n \\..i/ ��`-r-�' �: V may% l \ J J,\ \ ��' % ♦ \ .` �.
864ZA
r
IBM
a�rtn roc
^} v A-
'�-�'-•_.1 nm anna roc:
niva—
3JRCES SITE DESIGN, INC
TITLE,
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
(D
B/E AEROSPACE FACILITY
CRB
1455 FAIRCHILD ROAD
WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
CRB Gaolopw & Fnvimnn:mW
Smi..' Le,
8744 SW 133rd Street
R£V'D DATE:
2-10-2006
PROJECT NO. BEA414-02
FIGURE
Miuni, Florida 33176
tRAVN BY:
L. AYALA
SCALES AS NOTED
Telq:lwne:[phone]
3
F.-(305)567-2R53
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY,

36' 16'
I
80. 30' 80' 22.5' 80. 15' 80' 7.5'
STOKES CO. C B
I _ - FORSYTH CO. - - N - - 36' 16'
j
52 BELEWS CREK
STAINLEYVILLE
158
w
2d'
U
a
SMITH-REYNOLDS
ci
Bb
o
w
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
36' 7,5'
z
36' 7.5'
40
a
}
A
52
j
KERNERSVILLE
421
LEW VILLE
WINSTON-SALEM 40
a
40
a
421
Of
40
I
O
J
40
I
311
i
40
_--
i
CLEMMO S
DAVIDSON CO.
36. 0'
FORSYTH CO.
52 I
36' 0'
2 MILES
FIGURE
4
DAVIE CO.
D' C'
80' 30' 80' 22.5' 80' 15' 80. 7,5'
REGI❑NAL CR❑SS-SECTI❑N LOCATOR MAP
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAR❑LINA
I
\\�■m.�iI

CHARLOTTE BELT
Site
zz'*'
Geologic Formatlonss
PzC
Granitic Rock of Charlotte Belt
bC
Gneiss and Schist of Charlotte Belt
pCag
Ashe Formation
pCag
Ashe Formation
pCeC
Elk Park Plutonic Group
pCB
Biotite Gneiss
ur
Ultramafic Rock
Regional Hydrogeologic Cross -Section C-C'
Figure B/E Aerospace Facility
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
5 Forsyth County
Cr
4000'
SEA LEVEL
4000'
8000'
10,000,
Source: USGS 1975
Geologic Map of the East Half of the
Winston-Salem Quadrangle, NC -VA

IV12
r ;
AP
tk+ } y.
J r a
Fire Dept.
Forsyth
County -
Airport BE Aerospace
+ Interiors, Inc.
Forsyth
County
Airport
f
Garage/
Warehouse
- Forsyth
Forsyth County County
it Y Exienslon office Airport
.. r
Figure
6
M
�.*z - . '24P' *t-" '- _ '"rT� - .. A.
�4
_ \ ■�
qF. _ r r ' -f +� Forsyth COL my
Sheriff Garage44
Site & Surrounding Properties
B/E Aerospace Site
1400 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, NC Q)CR-B

SIQTH RETlaDS a HEADQUARTERS
.��� .wrA r•rr� r � r.ryr � rr..�w% .�Tr
0 \
DAUM M \ .AIO<l
STORAGE 00
1LLmf
�❑ 1
orwo
I TEST
aLaNG7 FACnffy
401
rus .�A rA .Awes j
mom
/
O
.iaarr oumw
N VAS HATQ SAIdu
AI/mL wMM
SCALD M ►m
tnto NRMZ WATO $Vft G UrATMC
vc A[IOH ICK rAmIT'/
YUMMSAr1.FNA L NC e�iAKlnM
�.rdML a oM.ow�w Ha.�. —MID ®� s M. AS,.....
FIGUR
SOu E
AllAlr ara r loco �
u® " oy Aniwo �n ns

I
I a
Ivor
Fumrrm TCmmTY
11iM ' 1
I' •1
L"Evumm 6
LIME '
i
1
,t
/
,
,
.APPamcva7E.
\ —LPG TMR
IN[VR?O
LMO
_—_____—_--_-�__
Hall W1TQ I
aIIMl STERN IE OIaYE
lIOIAME TAM
BUILDING 3A
P»a.
. MiIMLT .
l�
Vo
CO1
LEGEND,
— GEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION
"
0 MONITORING WELL
® MDNITCRtI G WELL/SOIL DURING \
_
_
1
PUMPING TEST WELL `�\
�_ ��_- --------
q FIRE HYDRANT
GUARD
y
~ l
T
• LIGHT POLE
BUD ING
F
■ ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
DRAINAGE `�
e LATCH DAM
``\
TRENCH DRAIN
/�•
• SS KV413LE
— - - — PROPERTY BOUNDARY
--------- FENCE
UMDEVELOPED
LAND
-+ - - --SEWER LINE
I- NW-2 AND SD EHA-7 WERE REMOVED
2- NV-8C THRU MW-16C WERE RENAMED NW-0 THRU NW-16
3- TEST LOCATIONS ARE APPROOMATE
�p
4- TEST SYMBOLS ARE NOT DRAWN TO SCALE
`\
��'
SMITH REYNOLDS
AIRPORT
N
p Oi Y�
•�
BUILDING I ,
METAL nrrn m
mITAEa M.
'ALWA
AgYRT�
Ti1MQ SCALE
A•PIImL to ;m

MW-17D (955.86)
MW-4 (952.05)
Z=W =rM =01. CO eq 'CO4
c, 1 !� a
MW-20 (950.38) MW-18 (953.63) A'
0) 04
— C,4 04 C-4 MW-19D (950.42) 955'
-950'
........... .......... '945'
. . ...... .... .. .. .... ..... ... ..... . .. ... . . ... ... .... ...... .. . ... ... .......... . . ... . .... 1340'
N ------ 935'
930.05-
.. ...... .. ... ... ... .......... .... ... ....... . ... .. . ... ..... ... .. ... ..... ..... ... ... .... . .... ... .... ...... .... ... .... ....... __ . ... .... ... ... ...........
... . .. . .... 930,
....... .... ......... .... ... .... .... . ... ... ... .. ........... .... ... ... ...... ... .. .. .......... .. .. ... .......... ... ... ...... .... ... ... ...... ... ... .... ...... ..... . . ... ... ... ...... . . .... ..... .. ........... .... ... .. .. ... ... ........ ... ... ....
------------------- 920'
SAPROUTE 918
915'
9 10'.. .... .. ... . ...... .... ... ... ... . . ... .. . ... ........ ... ... ........ .. ...... ... ... .... .... .... ... ... . ....... .... .. ... .. ... .. 9.10.63, 910,
915! .........
905*--- ------------------- ....... 905'
902 86'
1�03-6118-" -1
900' .. . ... ... ... ........... ... .. 601- Y' .. ... .. ..... ... .... .... ... .. ..... .... ... .. ... 900'
895! GO 597.05' . .... ..... . 895'
89,31.26 892.80
890'-
-------------- ------- -- -
885" - - ------ -885
882.05"1 "802.51' 882.83'
800' .. ....... ... ... . I..... . . . .... .. .. .... .......... .. ... .. ... ... ........... ... ... .... .......... ... ... .......... ... .. .... .. .. .... ... ... ...... .... - ... ...... . .. .... ... ... ... ... ........... .... ... ... .... ...... ... ... .... - .... ...... ... ... .... ........... ... ... .. . ... .. ... ... ... 880'
876.26 . 877.42'
8751--, ry.3V- - ------- --- --- 875-
870'.'-',w . . ... ... .... 870'
865! ...\ .... . ... ... .... .... ... .... ........... ... . . ...... .... ... .... ... . . . 865'
_. _ _ _ ..,. jr,42'
862.30'
855.'. - ... ...... .... ... ... . ...... ... ... ... ...... .... ... ... ... ...... - ........... ... ... ... ...... . ......... ... .. . .. ...... ... .. . ... .. . .. .. .. .. .. .... . .... ... ... 855'
LEGEND: 850' .. . .. ... .... 850'
849. 61'
845! 844.67' .-, BEDROCK , CON TACT 845
F. APPROXfjjWE,,
MONITORM WELL ------- ........ 840'
MAMER AND TIC \83W ....... ... .. .. ...... .... ... . .... . .... 835'
(917.00) ELEVATION
... ... ............... ... ..... ... ... ... . 825'
82��
820" 820'
B84.08'- TOP SCREEN _BEDROCK
ELEVATION 815! ----- --- ------------------- ------- ....... ....... . 815'
810 .. .. ... ... . . .. ... ... .... ......... .. ...... ... ... .... ... ... ...... .... . .. .. ... ... .... ..... ... .......... .... ... .... ........... ... . ........... ... ... .. ...... .... ... ... ........... ... ... ........... ... ... ... ........... ... ... .... . ........ ... . ...... ... ... .... . .... ... . ... .... . . .. ... .... 810'
805! . . . . . . ... . ... ........... ... . . . ....... .. . ... ... ........... ... ... .... ...... .... . .... .. ... ........... ... ... .... . . ...... ....... ... -11,11.11,11'.... ...... . .. . .. . . ... ...... . .. ... ... ........... .. ... ........ . .... ... ... ...... .... .. ... . .. . .. . ... . ..... .. ... ... .......... . 805'
wq.W-8OTT0M SCREEN 800'..... ....... ................ MW
ELEVATION
mommmm some w 795: ....... . . . ....... . ------ .................. sa cim walm h-9
Evasum ADWSPNZ FACLM
790 . .... ...... . ... ........... . ... ... - - - ----- ------- ---- -- - --- ........ I ... ........... .. . . ...... .... ... ... ......... 790' 140 PAPENU IWO
wlam*-Im^ HMN QWALM
785'-, 785' 1�m FIGURE
- ----------- - ----- I ...... ---I-
I/r =;rmam - �m l.w" 9

err I s �y�/� YAW rra Y\
MW-10D (950.42)--� MW-9 (952.89)-1

D'
�i
MW-13 (951.62)
MW-9 (952.89)--
D
MW-33 (*949.75)
955'
N
MW-32 (0943.51)
_.....
.. _ .
950'
3
3
2
_... - .
945'
940'
L
_..
940'
935'
_,..._._,.,,.
_.
.
- ... _... .,
935'
929.6 '
930' .
_...... ._ . . _,
_ . _....._....... ..
.. . ...... _ .. _ .....j
930'
927.89'
925'
..
_
_
925'
920' - �.
_,
------....
_. SAPROLITE
-
_ .._ ...... _
,., . , . _, ..
920'
915'
_ ......
_------
_
915
'912.75
_
912.89'
910'
/
��OCK
910'
900'_
.901.5
_... .
*897.75'
895'
;
895'
893 19
885'-
'086.51 �.......
.. _ . __.
_ , ....... _ . _... _ /.
885'
880'_. _.
._
_...._.___
_
/
880'
878.19
875' .
..
_ _. -.....
_.. . ,,... , ......... ..... .... .... _.._. ,.,,.
, , .,,, _.._ _.. .., ._ _ ..,, _ ... / ...... _,..
_,,. . _
...
875'
870'
_
... ....... ..... ...... ... .. �/ ._. _.
870'
865'
_
.._ __.
.
..............
_ _
865'
860' ..
__ _
.. _ ..... ._..__ ..
_....
_ . _ ..
860'
855' ..
_.....,........
.....
. .... .. ._ ..... ..... . _ .. ,.. .
_ ..
855'
850'
...... _..._
fir`
_
_
__.
_.
850'
trmlo
fi
MOWTMELL
NUMBER AND TIC
840'..
_. _... ..
_._ ..... W .. _. _.... _...... _ .. -
840'
(917.08) ElEVAT1DN
835'
.. _... .._ _
,. . _
835'
j.'
825' _............._
_. _ ...
. -- _.
_..
_
_
825'
TOP
ee4.0e'
IDSCREEN820'
\\ _
_ _ .
... ...........
... ... ... .... _...
820'
ELEVA
815'.-......
.....,.�
_ ..__.... _ ..
__........ ... __ _..
__ _
815'
810'
_..._...__.
__._.
-. _......_.
_.
810'
W9.08' BOTTOM SCREEN
605'
_._._. ._........._._.
...... ......... _...
_.__ _.___ __......_. ...........
_...__.
_.__ _.
_... _ _.._..
605'
ElEVATgM
-
....
800'v
_
_ __ ._ _ ....
800'
�.r�.
795'
_
.......
795'
A b°mios� °NgNnc.m
�noRn� warm
d..� �..
�ti785'
790'
790'
W" W • r Ud WAA r+. r.
wdit*_
•� Mr a ..
sra •n 1 I. A
i•osr i. sww
o.• . I
FIGURE
� .Now.% I ... m I'm
785'. _.
-
784.16
spirMM.wi.'

12
1
200
FIGURE
13
400
"\v„
8670
865
• 870
600 800 1000 1200
BEDROCK ELEVATION CONTOUR MAP
B/E AEROSPACE FACILITY
1455 FAIRCHILD ROAD
WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
150 FEET
Fr�

I
1
I
i
I
� Aa1Fl
v d
Ga~ scmx
LECOM
• MMMKM \RLL — - - —FRw7Y OlINT
10-FM ---------FD4X
cT} VFJiI' VF1L ——On=WATM G"AnM M FEET AMW ML
-
IAr. g23
M � 920
on im
I� �h
.w 910
Th. lat.rhl canteYrd b coMkY,"W
and ro port oI K con W .ftwk VI. m
.�'..+.d aTitberl p.rMsdon [7t1 Glalopkol E Envkrar..,n6Y S.rvlw
I_
Boo 1
975
965
ffiRM SITE DESiCF6 DC RAM
Tl,ln
fi10NVATFA El.LVATIDM WMTOR IW QUM
aeLIRR F*Jmow FALL *Tml.»L01. IC
&.kv E O.rwwAo 1 fe�a. E,e MIC �VYI F�O.'716 R7YtR
, VKM u � FIGURE
Om " LV MvlIO" A 14

MtlNR, Nw
LEGEND
f STORMWATER FLOW DIItECTmII
.
o GT1A51N
CATCH2
TRENCH BRAIN
W SOL GAS SIMPLE
• SOL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL
?: INDOOR AM SAMPLE
}N( ABANDONED MONITORING WELL
SMITH REYNOLDS
. AERATION WELL
0 DUEL IDN WELL
MONITORING WELL
AIRPORT
0 MONITORINGVEIL/SOIL DORM
_
9 RAPING ZEST WELL
= FIE M'DRANT
GIVEF----•--.-..�
LIlHT
SS MANHOLE
II
SG-IRN -11 ASPMALT
— PROPERTYBOUNDARY-� -� -� ^ — E
r
—
WE R LINE
I
DI
C
AREACTA SVE-
PLATING AND VASTEVATER
AREA.
RECYCLING & WASTE IM. STORAGE Fi
AREA L
TREATMENT AREA
SMETAL
1
CHIP STUAGE AREA
CYA SVE
a- HALLVAr
BUILDING IA
�FSAAMC B
ED
i
TNAaa i
BUILDING 2
Cr� _
tR- ILIER�1-�•1
•
-E9///,/(/��My
RECYCLING AREA
\•
1
T }
�
..'
!C-R!"W
3
DP
I
\1
� T
r
ram,
BUILDING I
.f'ss
i
,
D o-l0
27BD
III
M$TORM WATER!
i
1
N•v eN
f /
C�
T
I T
TEST
T
} MW_33
FACILITY
\\
TBUILDING
3
L n l
\
T
i
i
\•\
.fie
\ Q
'PL
i
♦
�
\ 7j�
•
T \
i
BUILDING 3A
f r
f
i
r UNDEVELOPED
�
iLAND
i T
p
I
r{W
32
ASPHALT
PARKW
( T
I
p A Yp Yp F I
E
r
~T pry-! \
1
f
i
WASTE
f
i �-IMIARDOR S
•
I
7
LFJI// ASPHALTI�1� yNEA
f[ NW-3� PAMaM
r
r T ASPHALT
_
_��AnNvaNG
/
b
A -
ADMIHISTRATN
/
A AV-
BUILDING
1
SMITH REYNOLDS
'
AIRPptT
-------------/
FAIR(yiILD ROAD
ASPHAL
\� 1•
/
FORSYTHI CORRr
AClGRICmAL
Dua
ami®c
HRm FVELOPED
LAND
ti
ry-T
SITE DRAINAGE
Ny�
OCRs
B/E AEROSPACE FACILITY
1455 FAIRCHILD ROAD, WINSTON-SALEM NC
GRAPHIC SCALE
L Emk`eAR.ntal SAN•.ICRs,
a 17a p zw.t
iENc.
RV9 1ATD
NA
u�FIGURE
Mll.4FlvA`
T
a4T7�
DRAWN TATD
BIC
fhLLD At a
15
I—
CIM 567-RW3
TRAWM 2M1
L ATALA
APPMVO DT RV.
IlK1NN.lAL% D MW a NY. ft~ La-6

FORSYTH COUNTY
AGRICULTURAL
BUILDING
UNDEVELOPED
LAND � I
UNDEVELOPED
GIGO 0
°p>M
LAND����
°Om
pp M71. AI�A
° °pO
STORMWATER p�
pi
OUTFALL
BTCRAM/ATER
�~
OUTFALL
(PRESUMED)
p OR
GUARDRAIL I
% �
GATE
M.11 DRLY
IAv.
u�r
o BTUMOE
7/
pJt �� AMiVLT
pm
WKM_
tt
AI%PHALT
GAn a�
BUILDING 3A
3 BUILDING
�,
e
° saaz a
tz
w.tb
twe
!0.M
)
Wt1E
�
BUILDING
Sam
FORSYTH COUNTY
GARAGE
loaf
© YK7
LEGEND:
DRAIN FLOW
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
FENCE
® MONITORING WELL
® FRENCH DRAIN
n CATCH BASIN
O ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
CI
HYDRANT
e MANHOLE
° SOIL GAS SAMPLING POINTS
0 SOIL BORING
Figure 16
A opf
BUILDING Y
1
PARKING -' o
BUILDING 1A
804011
pA2 lRiD
BUILDING 1 tlo-to
Wm MYi71
WNI
8001
pm O �Y
STD 1AOE
°!OW
OOCJ(
METAL CUTTINGS
GATE GATE Wa M�la ©�p,p HV2 CONTAINER AND
❑ GUARD F°^ .T 1147 PRIMARY OIL
BUILDING trta tlaf STORAGE AREA
MN.1
TEST
AC FACILITY
DRAINAGE BWALE
86/1 °
UNDEVELOPED
WD /
f
150 FEET
SMITH REYNOLDB
IR APORT
Soil Gas Sampling Locations
Soil Gas Survey - B/E Aerospace
1455 Fairchild Road
Winston-Salem, North Carolina

FORSYTH COUNTY
AGRICULTURAL
BUILDING
UNDEVELOPED
LAND a9 I
aaK
�y
4/
0 9.69
NMO +S(
BUILDING
5
FORSYTH COUNTY
GARAGE
6U 'I
som
!OW 0
1)0
0.14
o�n ure ao.m
GUARD_
BUILDING
LEGEND: _
GRAIN FLOWO.00 TT' TEST
PROPERTY BOUNDARY +pm FAC9.120
ac u +
FENCE U,�y�
© MONITORING WELL LAND
® FRENCH DRAIN \\
n CATCH BASIN
G ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
CI HYDRANT
e MANHOLE
c SOIL GAS SAMPLING POINTS
SOIL BORING
SMITH REYNOLOS
AIRPORT
Soil Gas contours in 100 ug intervals
Figure 17
PCE in Soil Gas Contour Map - May 1997
B/E Aerospace
1455 Fairchild Road
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
150 FEET
=R AND
OIL
AREA

f _ —
FP
Red
t
Dec orion /-
t 'ILL ,Jw
1 . " i
Natural
ttenuation
PP P
Vf
! got.
T
^'T
71,
Pf
ra ti., -
off 1
R
60b —
i
Groundwater Remediation Areas
Figure B/E Aerospace Site
19 1400 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, NC

APPENDIX IV
GROUNDWATER LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT

17/ Analjftal
wamepacalalmcam
i
November 14, 2012
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Rob Workman
CRB
5000 Old Buncombe Road Suite 2
Greenville, SC 29617
RE: Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Dear Rob Workman:
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on November 08, 2012.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless
otherwise noted in the body of the report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Bonnie McKee
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
cc: Braden Rambo, CRB
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
[phone]
Page 1 of 40

1"'�aceAnaocale
wwwcpeaaiabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr,
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Charlotte Certification IDs
9800 Kincey Ave. Ste 100, Huntersville, NC 28078
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37706
North Carolina Field Services Certification 5342
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 12
South Carolina Certification #: 99006001
CERTIFICATIONS
Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87627
Kentucky UST Certification #: 84
West Virginia Certification #: 357
VirginiaNELAP Certification #: 460221
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 2 of 40

�,-�aceAnaVical
wwsepeoelebs.00m
i
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr,
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project:
Pace Project No.:
BEA 11-02
92138061
Analytes
Lab ID
Sample ID
Method
Analysts
Reported
Laboratory
92138061001
MW-6
EPA 8260
AW
72
PASI-C
92138061002
MW-12D
EPA 8260
AW
72
PASI-C
92138061003
MW-1
EPA 8260
AW
72
PASI-C
92138061004
BESS-5
EPA 8260
AW
72
PASI-C
92138061005
BESS-6
EPA 8260
AW
72
PASI-C
92138061006
BESS-7
EPA 8260
AW
72
PASI-C
92138061007
BESS-4
EPA 8260
AW
72
PAST-C
92138061008
MW-33
EPA 8260
AW
72
PASI-C
92138061009
MW-19
EPA 8260
AW
72
PASI-C
92138061010
MW-18
EPA 8260
AW
72
PAST-C
92138061011
MW-15R
EPA 8260
AW
72
PASI-C
92138061012
MW-14D
EPA 8260
AW
72
PASI-C
92138061013
MW-21 D
EPA 8260
AW
72
PASI-C
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 3 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

�AceAnalytical
awWrpacsM&com
i
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-6 Lab ID: 92138061001 Collected: 11/08/12 10:30 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
[phone]
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone
ND ug/L
25.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
108-86-1
Bromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
74-97-5
Bromodichloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
75-27-4
Bromoform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
75-25-2
Bromomethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
74-83-9
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
78-93-3
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ND ug/L
100
1
11/12/12 19:55
75-65-0
n-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
104-51-8
sec-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
135-98-8
tert-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
98-06-6
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
108-90-7
Chloroethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
75-00-3
Chloroform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
67-66-3
Chloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
74-87-3
2-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
95-49-8
4-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
106-43-4
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
96-12-8
Dibromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
106-93-4
Dibromomethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
74-95-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
106-46-7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
75-71-8
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
75-34-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
540-59-0
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
75-35-4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
156-60-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
78-87-5
1,3-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
142-28-9
2,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
594-20-7
1,1-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
563-58-6
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
10061-01-5
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
10061-02-6
Diisopropyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
108-20-3
Ethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
100-41-4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
87-68-3
2-Hexanone
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
591-78-6
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
98-82-8
p4sopropyltoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
99-87-6
Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
75-09-2
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
108-10-1
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY
ANALYSIS
This report shall
not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 4 of 40

eAnalytical
www.peaelebs.cam
I
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-6
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Lab ID: 92138061001 Collected: 11/08/12 10:30 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
1634-04-4
Naphthalene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/1211219:55
91-20-3
n-Propylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
103-65-1
Styrene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
100-42-5
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
630-20-6
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
79-34-5
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
127-18-4
Toluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
108-88-3
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
87-61-6
1,2,4-Trichlorobe nzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
120-82-1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
71-55-6
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
79-00-5
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
79-01-6
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
75-69-4
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/1211219:55
96-18-4
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
95-63-6
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
108-67-8
Vinyl acetate
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
108-05-4
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
75-01-4
m&p-Xylene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
179601-23-1
o-Xylene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 19:55
95-47-6
Surrogates
4-Bromofluo robe nzene (S)
106 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 19:55
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
105 %
70-130
1
11 /12112 19:55
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichlorcethane-d4 (S)
113 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 19:55
17060-07-0
Toluene-08(S)
94 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 19:55
2037-26-5
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 5 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

eAnalytical
wiwwcpaosisbs.com
i
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-12D
Lab ID: 92138061002 Collected: 11/08/12 11:00 Received:
11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone
ND ug/L
25.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
108-86-1
Bromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
74-97-5
Bromodichloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
75-27-4
Bromoform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
75-25-2
Bromomethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
74-83-9
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
78-93-3
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ND ug/L
100
1
11/12/12 20:13
75-65-0
n-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
104-51-8
sec-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
135-98-8
tert-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
98-06-6
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
108-90-7
Chloroethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
75-00-3
Chloroform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
67-66-3
Chloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
74-87-3
2-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
95-49-8
4-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
106-43-4
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
96-12-8
Dibromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
106-93-4
Dibromomethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
74-95-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
106-46-7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
75-71-8
1,1-Dichlorcethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
75-34-3
1,2-Dichlorcethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
107-06-2
1,2-Dichlorcethene (Total)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
540-59-0
1,1-Dichlorcethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
75-35-4
cis-1,2-Dichlorcethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
156-60-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
78-87-5
1,3-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
142-28-9
2,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
594-20-7
1,1-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
563-58-6
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
10061-01-5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
10061-02-6
Diisopropyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
108-20-3
Ethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
100-41-4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
87-68-3
2-Hexanone
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
591-78-6
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
98-82-8
p4sopropyltoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
99-87-6
Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
75-09-2
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
108-10-1
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Page 6 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced,
except in full,
without the written consent
of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

eAnalytical
//-7wcwwwcpaoNabaoom
E
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-12D
Parameters
8260 MSV
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
Naphthalene
n-Propylbenzene
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,2,3-Tdchlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trich lorofluorometh ane
1,2,3-Trich loropropane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
m&p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
Toluene-d8 (S)
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Lab ID: 92138061002 Collected: 11/08/1211:00 Received: 11/08/1220:00 Matrix: Water
Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
1634-04-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
91-20-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
103-65-1
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
100-42-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
630-20-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
79-34-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
127-18-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
108-88-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
87-61-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
120-82-1
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
71-55-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
79-00-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
79-01-6
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
75-69-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
96-18-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
95-63-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
108-07-8
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
108-05-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
75-01-4
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
179601-23-1
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:13
95-47-6
116 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 20:13
460-00-4
99 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 20:13
1868-53-7
104 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 20:13
17060-07-0
93 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 20:13
2037-26-5
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 7 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

eAnalytical'
nww.peoerebacom
i
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-1
Lab ID: 92138061003 Collected: 11/08/12 12:00 Received:
11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone
ND ug/L
25.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
108-86-1
Bromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
74-97-5
Bromodichloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
75-27-4
Bromoform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
75-25-2
Bromomethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
74-83-9
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
78-93-3
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ND ug/L
100
1
11/12/12 20:32
75-65-0
n-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
104-51-8
sec-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
135-98-8
tert-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
98-06-6
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
108-90-7
Chloroethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
75-00-3
Chloroform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
67-66-3
Chloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
74-87-3
2-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
95-49-8
4-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
106-43-4
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
96-12-8
Dibromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromcethane(EDB)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
106-93-4
Dibromomethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
74-95-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
106-46-7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
75-71-8
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
75-34-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
540-59-0
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
75-35-4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
156-60-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
78-87-5
1,3-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/1211220:32
142-28-9
2,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
594-20-7
1,1-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
563-58-6
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
10061-01-5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
10061-02-6
Diisopropyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
108-20-3
Ethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
100-41-4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
87-68-3
2-Hexanone
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
591-78-6
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
98-82-8
p-Isopropyltoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
99-87-6
Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
75-09-2
4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
108-10-1
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Page 8 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical
Services, Inc..

eAnalytical.
wiewtpecelbb&com
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27268
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-1
Lab ID: 92138061003 Collected: 11/08/12 12:00
Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
1634-044
Naphthalene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
91-20-3
n-Propylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
103-65-1
Styrene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
10042-5
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
630-20-6
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
79-34-5
Tetrachloroethene
5.9 ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
127-184
Toluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
108-88-3
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
87-61-6
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
120-82-1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
71-55-6
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
79-00-5
Thchloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
79-01-6
Thchlorofluoromethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
75-69-4
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
96-18-4
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
95-63-6
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
108-07-8
Vinyl acetate
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
108-05-4
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
75-01-4
m&p-Xylene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
179601-23-1
o-Xylene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:32
95-47-6
Surrogates
4-Bromofluo robe nzene (S)
114 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 20:32
460-004
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
107 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 20:32
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
113 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 20:32
17060-07-0
Toluene-08 (S)
95 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 20:32
2037-26-5
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 9 of40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

eAnalytical
www.PWs1ebac0m
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr,
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kinoey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: BESS-5
Parameters
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Lab ID: 92138061004 Collected: 11/08/12 12:20 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua]
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone
ND ug/L
25.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
108-86-1
Bromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
74-97-5
Bromodichloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
75-27-4
Bromoform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
75-25-2
Bromomethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
74-83-9
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
78-93-3
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ND ug/L
100
1
11/12/12 20:50
75-65-0
n-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
104-51-8
sec-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
135-98-8
tert-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
98-06-6
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
108-90-7
Chloroethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
75-00-3
Chloroform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
67-66-3
Chloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
74-87-3
2-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
95-49-8
4-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
106-43-4
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
96-12-8
Dibromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
106-93-4
Dibromomethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
74-95-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
106-46-7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
75-71-8
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
75-34-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
540-59-0
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
75-35-4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
156-59-2
trans-1 2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
156-60-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
78-87-5
1,3-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
142-28-9
2,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
594-20-7
1, 1 -Dichlorop rope ne
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
563-58-6
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
10061-01-5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
10061-02-6
Diisopropyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
108-20-3
Ethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
100-41-4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
87-68-3
2-Hexanone
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
591-78-6
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
98-82-8
p-Isopropyltoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
99-87-6
Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
75-09-2
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
108-10-1
Date: 11 /14/2012 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 10 of 40

1��IaceAnalyfical"
www.poc&abs.com
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: BESS-5 Lab ID: 92138061004 Collected: 11/08/12 12:20 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
1634-04-4
Naphthalene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
91-20-3
n-Propylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
103-65-1
Styrene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
100-42-5
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
630-20-6
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
79-34-5
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
127-18-4
Toluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
108-88-3
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
87-61-6
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
120-82-1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
71-55-6
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
79-00-5
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
79-01-6
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
75-09-4
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
96-18-4
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
95-63-6
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
108-67-8
Vinyl acetate
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
108-05-4
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
75-01-4
m&p-Xylene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
179601-23-1
o-Xylene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 20:50
95-47-6
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
110 %
7C-130
1
11/12/12 20:50
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
107 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 20:50
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
112 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 20:50
17060-07-0
Toluene-08 (S)
97 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 20:50
2037-26-5
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 11 of40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
/�aceAqayicale
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
2225 Riverside Dr.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
-PBC&WbL-
Eden, NC 27288
Asheville, NC 28804
Huntersville, NC 28078
i
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
ANALYTICAL
RESULTS
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: BESS-6
Lab ID: 92138061005 Collected:
11/08/12 12:20 Received: 11/08/12 20:00
Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF
8260 MSV
Acetone
Benzene
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromod ichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
2-Butanone (MEK)
tert-Butyl Alcohol
n-Butylbenzene
sec-Butylbenzene
tert-Butylbenzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Dibromoch loromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Dibromomethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dich lorod ifluorometha ne
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
1,1-Dichloroethene
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichloropropane
2,2-Dichloropropane
1,1-Dichloropropene
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Diisopropyl ether
Ethylbenzene
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
2-Hexanone
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
p-Isopropyltoluene
Methylene Chloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
Date: 11 /14/2012 03:00 PM
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
ND ug/L
25.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
67-64-1
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
71-43-2
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
108-86-1
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
74-97-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
75-27-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
75-25-2
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
74-83-9
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
78-93-3
ND ug/L
100
1
11/12/12 21:09
75-65-0
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
104-51-8
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
135-98-8
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
98-06-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
56-23-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
108-90-7
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
75-00-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
67-66-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
74-87-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
95-49-8
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
106-43-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
96-12-8
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
124-48-1
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
106-93-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
74-95-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
95-50-1
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
541-73-1
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
106-46-7
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
75-71-8
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
75-34-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
107-06-2
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
540-59-0
29.1 ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
75-35-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
156-59-2
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
156-60-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
78-87-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
142-28-9
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
594-20-7
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
563-58-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
10061-01-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
10061-02-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
108-20-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
100-41-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
87-68-3
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
591-78-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
98-82-8
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
99-87-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
75-09-2
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
108-10-1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 12 of 40

BA11c1yical o
/�WcJ wwwwalsba mm
I
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: BESS-6 Lab ID: 92138061005 Collected: 11/08/12 12:20 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
Naphthalene
n-Propylbenzene
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trich loroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trich lorofl uoromethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
m&p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
Toluene-d8 (S)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
1634-04-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
91-20-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
103-65-1
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
100-42-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
630-20-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
79-34-5
198 ug/L
10.0
2
11/13/1212:43
127-18-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
108-88-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
87-61-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
120-82-1
5.8 ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
71-55-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
79-00-5
15.3 ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
79-01-6
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
75-69-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
96-18-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
95-63-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
108-07-8
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
108-05-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
75-01-4
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
179601-23-1
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:09
95-47-6
122 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 21:09
460-00-4
101 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 21:09
1868-53-7
105 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 21:09
17060-07-0
99 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 21:09
2037-26-5
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 13 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of PaceAnalytical Services, Inc..

/�7/aeAnalytical
cwwwPonawcom
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: BESS-7 Lab ID: 92138061006 Collected: 11/08/12 12:15 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone
ND ug/L
25.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
108-86-1
Bromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
74-97-5
Bromodichloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
75-27-4
Bromoform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
75-25-2
Bromomethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
74-83-9
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
78-93-3
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ND ug/L
100
1
11/12/12 21:27
75-65-0
n-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
104-51-8
sec-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
135-98-8
tert-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
98-06-6
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
108-90-7
Chloroethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
75-00-3
Chloroform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
67-66-3
Chloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
74-87-3
2-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
95-49-8
4-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
106-43-4
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
96-12-8
Dibromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
106-93-4
Dibromomethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
74-95-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
106-46-7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
75-71-8
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
75-34-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
540-59-0
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
75-35-4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
156-59-2
trans-1 2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
156-60-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
78-87-5
1,3-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
142-28-9
2,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
594-20-7
1,1-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
563-58-6
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
10061-01-5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
10061-02-6
Diisopropyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
108-20-3
Ethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
100-41-4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
87-68-3
2-Hexanone
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
591-78-6
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
98-82-8
p-Isopropyltoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
99-87-6
Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
75-09-2
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
108-10-1
Date: 11 /14/2012 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 14 of 40

o Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
aceAnalytical 205 East Meadow Road - Suite A 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
wwwpeae com Eden, NC 27288 Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
j [phone] [phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: BESS-7
Lab ID: 92138061006 Collected: 11/08/12 12:15
Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water ^
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
1634-04-4
Naphthalene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
91-20-3
n-Propyibenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
103-65-1
Styrene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
100-42-5
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
630-20-6
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
79-34-5
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
127-18-4
Toluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
108-88-3
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
87-61-6
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
120-82-1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
71-55-6
1,1,2-Tdchloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
79-00-5
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
79-01-6
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
75-69-4
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
96-18-4
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
95-63-6
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
108-67-8
Vinyl acetate
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
108-05-4
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
75-01-4
m&p-Xylene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
179601-23-1
o-Xylene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/12/12 21:27
95-47-6
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
116 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 21:27
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
101 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 21:27
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
113 %
7Ci-130
1
11/12/12 21:27
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
98 %
70-130
1
11/12/12 21:27
2037-26-5
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 15 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

�eAnalyfical'
wwwkpecelebs.com
t`
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: BESS-4
Parameters
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Lab ID: 92138061007 Collected: 11/08/12 12:25 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua]
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone
ND ug/L
25.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
108-86-1
Bromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
74-97-5
Bromodichloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
75-27-4
Bromoform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
75-25-2
Bromomethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
74-83-9
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
78-93-3
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ND ug/L
100
1
11/13/12 01:09
75-65-0
n-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
104-51-8
sec-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
135-98-8
tert-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
98-06-6
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
108-90-7
Chloroethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
75-00-3
Chloroform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
67-66-3
Chloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
74-87-3
2-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
95-49-8
4-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
106-43-4
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
96-12-8
Dibromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
106-93-4
Dibromomethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
74-95-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
106-46-7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
75-71-8
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
75-34-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
540-59-0
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
75-35-4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
156-60-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
78-87-5
1,3-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
142-28-9
2,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
594-20-7
1,1-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
563-58-6
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
10061-01-5
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
10061-02-6
Diisopropyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
108-20-3
Ethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
100-41-4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
87-68-3
2-Hexanone
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
591-78-6
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
98-82-8
p-Isopropyltoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
99-87-6
Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
75-09-2
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
108-10-1
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of PaceAnalytical Services, Inc..
Page 16 of 40

Analytical'
wwa:paosrsbsaam
t
i
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: BESS-4
Lab ID: 92138061007 Collected: 11/08/12 12:25
Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
1634-04-4
Naphthalene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
91-20-3
n-Propylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
103-65-1
Styrene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
100-42-5
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
630-20-6
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
79-34-5
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
127-18-4
Toluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
108-88-3
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
87-61-6
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
120-82-1
1,1,1-Tdchloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
71-55-6
1,12-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
79-00-5
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
79-01-6
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
75-69-4
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
96-18-4
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
95-63-6
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
108-67-8
Vinyl acetate
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
108-05-4
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
75-01-4
m&p-Xylene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
179601-23-1
o-Xylene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:09
95-47-6
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
114 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 01:09
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
102 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 01:09
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
112 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 01:09
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
93 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 01:09
2037-26-5
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 17 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

�PaceAnalyNo/
wwwepecefabs.com
I
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-33 Lab ID: 92138061008 Collected: 11/08/12 13:15 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua[
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone
ND ug/L
25.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
108-86-1
Bromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
74-97-5
Bromodichloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
75-27-4
Bromoform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
75-25-2
Bromomethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
74-83-9
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
78-93-3
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ND ug/L
100
1
11/1311201:28
75-65-0
n-Butylbenzene
NO ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
104-51-8
sec-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
135-98-8
tert-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
98-06-6
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
108-90-7
Chloroethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
75-00-3
Chloroform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
67-66-3
Chloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
74-87-3
2-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
95-49-8
4-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
106-43-4
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
NO ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
96-12-8
Dibromochloromethane
NO ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
NO ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
106-93-4
Dibromomethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
74-95-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
106-46-7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
75-71-8
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
75-34-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
540-59-0
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
75-35-4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
156-60-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
NO ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
78-87-5
1,3-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
142-28-9
2,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
594-20-7
1,1-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
563-58-6
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
NO ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
10061-01-5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
10061-02-6
Diisopropyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
108-20-3
Ethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
100-41-4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
87-68-3
2-Hexanone
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
591-78-6
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
NO ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
98-82-8
p-Isopropyltoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
99-87-6
Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
75-09-2
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
108-10-1
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 18 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

eAnalytical.
P00M
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-33 Lab ID: 92138061008 Collected: 11/08/12 13:15 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Resufts Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
1634-04-4
Naphthalene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
91-20-3
n-Propylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
103-65-1
Styrene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
100-42-5
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
630-20-6
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
79-34-5
Tetrachloroethene
5.7 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
127-184
Toluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
108-88-3
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
87-61-6
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
120-82-1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
71-55-6
1,1,2-Tdchloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
79-00-5
Tdchloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
79-01-6
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
75-69-4
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
96-18-4
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
95-63-6
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
108-67-8
Vinyl acetate
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
108-05-4
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
75-01-4
m&p-Xylene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
179601-23-1
o-Xylene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:28
95-47-6
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
112 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 01:28
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
106 %
7D-130
1
11/13/12 01:28
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
107 %
7D-130
1
11/13/12 01:28
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
98 %
7D-130
1
11/13/12 01:28
2037-26-5
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 19 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

eAnalytical
pacelehLcam
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-19
Parameters
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Lab ID: 92138061009 Collected: 11/08/12 14:10 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua[
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone
ND ug/L
25.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
108-86-1
Bromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
74-97-5
Bromodichloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
75-27-4
Bromoform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
75-25-2
Bromomethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
74-83-9
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
78-93-3
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ND ug/L
100
1
11/13/12 01:46
75-65-0
n-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
104-51-8
sec-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
135-98-8
tert-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
98-06-6
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
108-90-7
Chloroethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
75-00-3
Chloroform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
67-66-3
Chloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
74-87-3
2-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
95-49-8
4-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
106-43-4
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
96-12-8
Dibromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
106-93-4
Dibromomethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
74-95-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
106-46-7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
75-71-8
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
75-34-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
540-59-0
1,1-Dichloroethene
29.4 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
75-35-4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
156-60-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
78-87-5
1,3-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
142-28-9
2,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
594-20-7
1,1-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
563-58-6
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
10061-01-5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
10061-02-6
Diisopropyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
108-20-3
Ethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
100-41-4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
87-68-3
2-Hexanone
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
591-78-6
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
98-82-8
p-Isopropyltoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
99-87-6
Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
75-09-2
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
108-10-1
Date: 11 /14/2012 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 20 of 40

�eAnapicat
wwwcPacetabe.corn
i
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kinoey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: MW-19 Lab ID: 92138061009 Collected: 11/08/12 14:10 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
Naphthalene
n-Propylbenzene
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tetrach loroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluo ro methane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
m&p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
Toluene-d8 (S)
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
29.9 ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
114 %
115 %
118 %
97 %
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
1634-04-4
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
91-20-3
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
103-65-1
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
100-42-5
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
630-20-6
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
79-34-5
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
127-18-4
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
108-88-3
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
87-61-6
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
120-82-1
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
71-55-6
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
79-00-5
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
79-01-6
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
75-69-4
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
96-18-4
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
95-63-6
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
10M7-8
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
108-05-4
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
75-01-4
10.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
179601-23-1
5.0
1
11/13/12 01:46
95-47-6
70-130
1
11/13/12 01:46
460-00-4
70-130
1
11/13/12 01:46
1868-53-7
70-130
1
11/13/12 01:46
17060-07-0
70-130
1
11/13/12 01:46
2037-26-5
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 21 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

1�71aceAnaVkalo
wwMcpac&%b&Can
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-18
Parameters
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Lab ID: 92138061010 Collected: 11/08/12 14:45 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone
ND ug/L
25.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
108-86-1
Bromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
74-97-5
Bromodichloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
75-27-4
Bromoform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
75-25-2
Bromomethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
74-83-9
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
78-93-3
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ND ug/L
100
1
11/13/12 02:05
75-65-0
n-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
104-51-8
sec-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
135-98-8
tert-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
98-06-6
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
108-90-7
Chloroethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
75-00-3
Chloroform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
67-66-3
Chloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
74-87-3
2-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
95-49-8
4-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
106-43-4
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
96-12-8
Dibromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
106-93-4
Dibromomethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
74-95-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
106-46-7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
75-71-8
1,1-Dichloroethane
11.9 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
75-34-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
22.8 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
540-59-0
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
75-35-4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
22.8 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
156-60-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
78-87-5
1,3-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
142-28-9
2,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
594-20-7
1,1-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
563-58-6
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
10061-01-5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
10061-02-6
Diisopropyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
108-20-3
Ethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
100-41-4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
87-68-3
2-Hexanone
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
591-78-6
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
98-82-8
p-Isopropyltoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
99-87-6
Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
75-09-2
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
108-10-1
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 22 of 40

,��aceAffllyttal*
wwwepecalabs.com
t
i
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-18
Lab ID: 92138061010 Collected: 11/08/12 14:45
Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
1634-04-4
Naphthalene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
91-20-3
n-Propylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
103-65-1
Styrene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
100-42-5
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
630-20-6
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
79-34-5
Tetrachloroethene
131 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
127-18-4
Toluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
108-88-3
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
87-61-6
1,2,4-Trichlorobe nzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
120-82-1
1,1,1-Trchloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
71-55-6
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
79-00-5
Trichloroethene
9.4 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
79-01-6
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
75-69-4
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
96-18-4
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
95-63-6
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
108-67-8
Vinyl acetate
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
108-05-4
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
75-01-4
map-Xylene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
179601-23-1
o-Xylene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:05
95-47-6
Surrogates
4-Bromofluo robe nzene (S)
112 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 02:05
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
104 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 02:05
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
109 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 02:05
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S)
95 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 02:05
2037-26-5
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 23 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

/71aceAnalytkalo
www.pecef com
PaceAnall/tical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample: MW-15R Lab ID: 92138061011 Collected: 11/08/12 15:50 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DI= Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone
ND ug/L
25.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
108-86-1
Bromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
74-97-5
Bromodichloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
75-27-4
Bromoform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
75-25-2
Bromomethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
74-83-9
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
78-93-3
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ND ug/L
100
1
11/13/12 02:23
75-65-0
n-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
104-51-8
sec-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
135-98-8
tert-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
98-06-0
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
108-90-7
Chloroethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
75-00-3
Chloroform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
67-06-3
Chloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
74-87-3
2-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
95-49-8
4-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
106-43-4
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
96-12-8
Dibromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
106-93-4
Dibromomethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
74-95-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobe nzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
106-46-7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
75-71-8
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
75-34-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
78.6 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
540-59-0
1,1-Dichloroethene
25.2 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
75-35-4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
78.6 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
156-59-2
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
156-00-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
78-87-5
1,3-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
142-28-9
2,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
594-20-7
1,1-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
563-58-6
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
10061-01-5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
10061-02-6
Diisopropyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
108-20-3
Ethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
100-41-4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
87-68-3
2-Hexanone
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
591-78-6
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
98-82-8
p-Isopropyltoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
99-87-6
Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
75-09-2
4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
108-10-1
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 24 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

1�71aceAnalyticale
w#wgwc*teb&cam
f
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-15R Lab ID: 92138061011 Collected: 11/08/12 15:50 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
Naphthalene
n-Propylbenzene
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trich lorofluorometh a ne
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
m&p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
Toluene-d8 (S)
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
1634-04-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
91-20-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
103-65-1
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
100-42-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
630-20-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
79-34-5
817 ug/L
50.0
10
11/13/1213:02
127-18-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
108-88-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
87-61-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
120-82-1
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
71-55-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
79-00-5
24.4 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
79-01-6
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
75-69-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
96-18-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
95-63-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
108-67-8
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
108-05-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
75-01-4
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
179601-23-1
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:23
95-47-6
112 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 02:23
460-00-4
108 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 02:23
1868-53-7
112 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 02:23
17060-07-0
98 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 02:23
2037-26-5
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 25 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

71aceAnalytkal'
WWVtpacdabscom
1
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-14D Lab ID: 92138061012 Collected: 11/08/12 17:00 Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua]
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone
ND ug/L
25.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
108-86-1
Bromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
74-97-5
Bromodichloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
75-27-4
Bromoform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
75-25-2
Bromomethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
74-83-9
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
78-93-3
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ND ug/L
100
1
11/13/12 02:42
75-65-0
n-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
104-51-8
sec-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
135-98-8
tert-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
98-06-6
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
108-90-7
Chloroethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
75-00-3
Chloroform
5.2 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
67-66-3
Chloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
74-87-3
2-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
95-49-8
4-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
106-43-4
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
96-12-8
Dibromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
106-93-4
Dibromomethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
74-95-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
106-46-7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
75-71-8
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
75-34-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
45.6 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
540-59-0
1,1-Dichloroethene
8.9 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
75-35-4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
45.6 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
156-60-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
78-87-5
1,3-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
142-28-9
2,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
594-20-7
1,1-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
563-58-6
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
10061-01-5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
10061-02-6
Diisopropyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
108-20-3
Ethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
100-41-4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
87-68-3
2-Hexanone
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
591-78-6
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
98-82-8
p-Isopropyltoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
99-87-6
Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
75-09-2
4-Methyl-2-pe nta none (MIBK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
108-10-1
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 26 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

WeeAnalytical"
W&V4PC0M
i
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-14D Lab ID: 92138061012 Collected: 11/08/1217:00 Received: 11/08/1220:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
1634-04-4
Naphthalene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
91-20-3
n-Propylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
103-65-1
Styrene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
100-42-5
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
630-20-6
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
79-34-5
Tetrachloroethene
1000 ug/L
50.0
10
11/13/12 13:20
127-18-4
Toluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
108-88-3
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
87-61-6
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
120-82-1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
71-55-6
1,1,2-Tdchloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
79-00-5
Trichloroethene
20.0 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
79-01-6
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
75-69-4
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
96-18-4
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
95-63-6
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
108-07-8
Vinyl acetate
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
108-05-4
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
75-01-4
m&p-Xylene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
179601-23-1
o-Xylene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 02:42
95-47-6
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S)
110 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 02:42
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
104 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 02:42
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
107 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 02:42
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S)
98 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 02:42
2037-26-5
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 27 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

1�74eAnalytical*
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-21 D Lab ID: 92138061013 Collected: 11 /08/12 17:40 Received: 11 /08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone
ND ug/L
25.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
108-86-1
Bromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
74-97-5
Bromodichloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
75-27-4
Bromoform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
75-25-2
Bromomethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
74-83-9
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
78-93-3
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ND ug/L
100
1
11/13/12 03:00
75-65-0
n-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
104-51-8
sec-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
135-98-8
tert-Butylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
98-06-6
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
108-90-7
Chloroethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
75-00-3
Chloroform
7.3 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
67-66-3
Chloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
74-87-3
2-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
95-49-8
4-Chlorotoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
106-43-4
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
96-12-8
Dibromochloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
106-93-4
Dibromomethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
74-95-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
106-46-7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
75-71-8
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
75-34-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
76.9 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
540-59-0
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
75-35-4
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
76.9 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
156-60-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
78-87-5
1,3-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
142-28-9
2,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
594-20-7
1,1-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
563-58-6
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
10061-01-5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
10061-02-6
Diisopropyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
108-20-3
Ethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
100-41-4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
87-68-3
2-Hexanone
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
591-78-6
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
98-82-8
p-Isopropyltoluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
99-87-6
Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
75-09-2
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
108-10-1
Date: 11 /14/2012 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 28 of 40

1��WceAnalytical*
W#KPK&1ab&c0r"
E
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Sample: MW-21D
Lab ID: 92138061013 Collected: 11/08/12 17:40
Received: 11/08/12 20:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
1634-04-4
Naphthalene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
91-20-3
n-Propylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
103-65-1
Styrene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
100-42-5
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
630-20-6
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
79-34-5
Tetrachloroethene
1060 ug/L
50.0
10
11/13/1213:39
127-18-4
Toluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
108-88-3
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
87-61-6
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
120-82-1
1,1,1-Tdchloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
71-55-6
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
79-00-5
Trichloroethene
24.4 ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
79-01-6
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
75-69-4
1,2,3-Tdchloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
96-18-4
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
95-63-6
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
108-67-8
Vinyl acetate
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
108-05-4
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
75-01-4
m&p-Xylene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
179601-23-1
o-Xylene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
11/13/12 03:00
95-47-6
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
124 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 03:00
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
101 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 03:00
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-04 (S)
107 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 03:00
17060-07-0
Toluene-08 (S)
101 %
70-130
1
11/13/12 03:00
2037-26-5
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 29 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

471`a/ceAnalytical
w+vMtpaceteba.com
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
QC Batch: MSV/21065 Analysis Method: EPA 8260
QC Batch Method: EPA 8260 Analysis Description: 8260 MSV SC
Associated Lab Samples: 92138061001, 92138061002, 92138061003, 92138061004, 92138061005, 92138061006
METHOD BLANK: 870695 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92138061001, 92138061002, 92138061003, 92138061004, 92138061005, 92138061006
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,1,1-Tihchooroethane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12M211:33
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,1-Dichloropropene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,2,3-Tdchloropropane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/1211:33
1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/1211211:33
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/1211211:33
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,3-Dichloropropane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
2,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
2-Butanone (MEK)
ug/L
NO
10.0
11/12/12 11:33
2-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
2-Hexanone
ug/L
NO
10.0
11/12/12 11:33
4-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ug/L
NO
10.0
11/12/12 11:33
Acetone
ug/L
NO
25.0
11/12/12 11:33
Benzene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Bromobenzene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Bromochloromethane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Bromodichloromethane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Bromoform
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Bromomethane
ug/L
NO
10.0
11/12/12 11:33
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/1211211:33
Chloroethane
ug/L
NO
10.0
11/12/12 11:33
Chloroform
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Chloromethane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/1211211:33
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/1211211:33
Dibromomethane
ug/L
NO
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,
except in hk
without the written consent of Pace Analytical
Services, Inc..
Page 30 of 40

e Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
L'eAnaly/a � `�' 205 East Meadow Road - Suite A 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
wwwP corn Eden, NC 27288 Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
i
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
METHOD BLANK: 870695 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92138061001, 92138061002, 92138061003, 92138061004, 92138061005, 92138061006
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Diisopropyl ether
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Ethylbenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
m&p-Xylene
ug/L
ND
10.0
11/12/12 11:33
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Methylene Chloride
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
n-Butylbenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
n-Propylbenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Naphthalene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
o-Xylene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
p-Isopropyltoluene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
see-Butylbenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Styrene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ug/L
ND
100
11/12/12 11:33
tert-Butylbenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Toluene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Trichloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
Trichlorofluoromethane
ug/L
ND
10.0
11/12/12 11:33
Vinyl acetate
ug/L
ND
10.0
11/12/12 11:33
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 11:33
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
104
70-130
11/12/12 11:33
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
123
70-130
11/12/12 11:33
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
%
95
70-130
11/12/12 11:33
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
94
70-130
11/12/12 11:33
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
Parameter
870696
Units
Spike
Conc.
LCS
Result
LCS
% Rec
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
50
52.6
105
70-130
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/L
50
54.1
108
70-130
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
50
46.3
93
70-130
1,1,2-Tdchloroethane
ug/L
50
51.5
103
70-130
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/L
50
46.1
92
70-130
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
50
45.4
91
70-130
1,1-Dichloropropene
ug/L
50
47.2
94
70-130
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
46.1
92
70-130
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ug/L
50
45.8
92
70-130
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
48.4
97
70-130
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ug/L
50
44.2
88
70-130
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ug/L
50
46.0
92
70-130
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 31 of40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

eAnalytical
1 Wo pecalebs.com
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville. NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
Parameter
870696
Units
Spike
Conc.
LCS
Result
LCS
% Rec
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ug/L
50
46.8
94
70-130
1,2-Dichlorobe nzene
ug/L
50
46.7
93
70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
50
53.4
107
70-130
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
ug/L
100
88.8
89
70-130
1,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
50
47.5
95
70-130
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ug/L
50
43.7
87
70-130
1,3-Dichlorobe nzene
ug/L
50
44.9
90
70-130
1,3-Dichloropropane
ug/L
50
45.8
92
70-130
1,4-Dichlorobe nzene
ug/L
50
45.0
90
70-130
2,2-Dich►oropropane
ug/L
50
55.4
111
70-130
2-Butanone (MEK)
ug/L
100
93.6
94
70-130
2-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
50
42.6
85
70-130
2-Hexanone
ug/L
100
90.1
90
70-130
4-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
50
44.4
89
70-130
4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)
ug/L
100
95.5
96
70-130
Acetone
ug/L
100
105
105
70-130
Benzene
ug/L
50
48.1
96
70-130
Bromobenzene
ug/L
50
41.9
84
70-130
Bromochloromethane
ug/L
50
50.1
100
70-130
Bromodichloromethane
ug/L
50
55.7
111
70-130
Bromoform
ug/L
50
58.4
117
70-130
Bromomethane
ug/L
50
45.0
90
70-130
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
50
68.6
137
70-130 LO
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
50
49.1
98
70-130
Chloroethane
ug/L
50
43.1
86
70-130
Chloroform
ug/L
50
49.1
98
70-130
Chloromethane
ug/L
50
47.5
95
70-130
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
50
44.4
89
70-130
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
50
51.0
102
70-130
Dibromochioromethane
ug/L
50
53.4
107
70-130
Dibromomethane
ug/L
50
57.5
115
70-130
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/L
50
61.4
123
70-130
Diisopropyl ether
ug/L
50
39.4
79
70-130
Ethylbenzene
ug/L
50
50.0
100
70-130
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ug/L
50
51.9
104
70-130
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ug/L
50
49.6
99
70-130
m&p-Xylene
ug/L
100
104
104
70-130
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ug/L
50
47.8
96
70-130
Methylene Chloride
ug/L
50
40.7
81
70-130
n-Butylbenzene
ug/L
50
42.4
85
70-130
n-Propylbenzene
ug/L
50
42.8
86
70-130
Naphthalene
ug/L
50
45.3
91
70-130
o-Xylene
ug/L
50
48.4
97
70-130
p-Isopropyltoluene
ug/L
50
47.2
94
70-130
sec-Butylbenzene
ug/L
50
42.9
86
70-130
Styrene
ug/L
50
50.9
102
70-130
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ug/L
500
730
146
70-130 LO
tert-Butylbenzene
ug/L
50
44.0
88
70-130
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 32 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

���WceAwlyfical'
� wwwcpacale6a.oam
i
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
Parameter
870696
Units
Spike
Conc.
LCS
Result
LCS
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
50
52.4
105
70-130
Toluene
ug/L
50
51.4
103
70-130
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
50
44.4
89
70-130
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
50
54.7
109
70-130
Trichloroethene
ug/L
50
52.7
105
70-130
Trichlorofluoromethane
ug/L
50
58.9
118
70-130
Vinyl acetate
ug/L
100
84.8
85
70-130
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
50
45.7
91
70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
100
70-130
4-Bromofluo robe nzene (S)
%
116
70-130
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
%
104
70-130
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
99
70-130
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Qualifiers
Page 33 of 40

eAnalytical e
www'Pecema com
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
QC Batch: MSV/21068 Analysis Method: EPA 8260
QC Batch Method: EPA 8260 Analysis Description: 8260 MSV SC
Associated Lab Samples: 92138061007, 92138061008, 92138061009, 92138061010, 92138061011, 92138061012, 92138061013
METHOD BLANK: 870763 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92138061007, 92138061008, 92138061009, 92138061010, 92138061011, 92138061012, 92138061013
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,1-Dichloropropene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB)
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,3,5-Tdmethylbenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,3-Dichloropropane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
2,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
2-Butanone (MEK)
ug/L
ND
10.0
11/12/12 23:55
2-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
2-Hexanone
ug/L
ND
10.0
11/12/12 23:55
4-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ug/L
ND
10.0
11/12/12 23:55
Acetone
ug/L
ND
25.0
11/12/12 23:55
Benzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Bromobenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Bromochloromethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Bromodichloromethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Bromoform
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Bromomethane
ug/L
ND
10.0
11/12/12 23:55
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Chloroethane
ug/L
ND
10.0
11/12/12 23:55
Chloroform
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Chloromethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Dibromomethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace
Analytical
Services, Inc..
Page 34 of 40

n.� s Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Aap '�' 1 205 East Meadow Road - Suite A 2225 Riverside Dr.
�� Eden, NC 27288 Asheville, NC 28804
/�Wce
[phone] [phone]
I
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
METHOD BLANK: 870763 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92138061007, 92138061008, 92138061009, 92138061010, 92138061011, 92138061012, 92138061013
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Diisopropyl ether
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Ethylbenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
m&p-Xylene
ug/L
ND
10.0
11/12/12 23:55
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Methylene Chloride
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
n-Butylbenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
n-Propylbenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Naphthalene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
o-Xylene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
p-Isopropyltoluene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
sec-Butylbenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Styrene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ug/L
ND
100
11/12/12 23:55
tert-Butylbenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Toluene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Trichloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
Trichlorofluoromethane
ug/L
ND
10.0
11/12/12 23:55
Vinyl acetate
ug/L
ND
10.0
11/12/12 23:55
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
ND
5.0
11/12/12 23:55
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
98
70-130
11/12/12 23:55
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
109
70-130
11/12/12 23:55
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
%
99
70-130
11/12/12 23:55
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
97
70-130
11/12/12 23:55
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
Parameter
870764
Units
Spike
Conc.
LCS
Result
LCS
% Rec
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
50
53.1
106
70-130
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
ug/L
50
57.6
115
70-130
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
50
49.0
98
70-130
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/L
50
54.1
108
70-130
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/L
50
48.6
97
70-130
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
50
51.6
103
70-130
1,1-Dichloropropene
ug/L
50
49.8
100
70-130
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
45.6
91
70-130
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ug/L
50
54.2
108
70-130
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
45.4
91
70-130
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ug/L
50
40.3
81
70-130
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ug/L
50
41.2
82
70-130
Date: 11 /14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 35 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

eAnalytical.
WWW4X &%ba.aom
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
870764
Spike
LCS
LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ug/L
50
53.2
106
70-130
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
44.5
89
70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
50
58.7
117
70-130
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
ug/L
100
97.4
97
70-130
1,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
50
50.0
100
70-130
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ug/L
50
41.2
82
70-130
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
42.2
84
70-130
1,3-Dichloropropane
ug/L
50
49.5
99
70-130
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
43.0
86
70-130
2,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
50
47.1
94
70-130
2-Butanone(MEK)
ug/L
100
101
101
70-130
2-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
50
41.2
82
70-130
2-Hexanone
ug/L
100
91.7
92
70-130
4-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
50
41.8
84
70-130
4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)
ug/L
100
101
101
70-130
Acetone
ug/L
100
103
103
70-130
Benzene
ug/L
50
50.4
101
70-130
Bromobenzene
ug/L
50
38.9
78
70-130
Bromochloromethane
ug/L
50
54.7
109
70-130
Bromodichloromethane
ug/L
50
56.3
113
70-130
Bromoform
ug/L
50
62.0
124
70-130
Bromomethane
ug/L
50
50.6
101
70-130
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
50
61.0
122
70-130
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
50
50.8
102
70-130
Chloroethane
ug/L
50
44.9
90
70-130
Chloroform
ug/L
50
55.1
110
70-130
Chloromethane
ug/L
50
49.7
99
70-130
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
50
48.7
97
70-130
cis- 1, 3-Dich lorop rope ne
ug/L
50
50.4
101
70-130
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
50
56.4
113
70-130
Dibromomethane
ug/L
50
59.5
119
70-130
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/L
50
64.0
128
70-130
Diisopropyl ether
ug/L
50
43.0
86
70-130
Ethylbenzene
ug/L
50
50.8
102
70-130
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ug/L
50
46.9
94
70-130
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene)
ug/L
50
50.6
101
70-130
m&p-Xylene
ug/L
100
106
106
70-130
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ug/L
50
51.6
103
70-130
Methylene Chloride
ug/L
50
47.9
96
70-130
n-Butylbenzene
ug/L
50
38.7
77
70-130
n-Propylbenzene
ug/L
50
39.2
78
70-130
Naphthalene
ug/L
50
47.4
95
70-130
o-Xylene
ug/L
50
47.8
96
70-130
p-Isopropyltoluene
ug/L
50
43.0
86
70-130
sec-Butylbenzene
ug/L
50
39.8
80
70-130
Styrene
ug/L
50
52.8
106
70-130
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ug/L
500
740
148
70-130 LO
tert-Butylbenzene
ug/L
50
42.2
84
70-130
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,
except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 36 of 40

17W Analytical
M+ iapsoalshLcom
I
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 870764
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Spike
LCS
LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits
Qualifiers
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
50
58.6
117
70-130
Toluene
ug/L
50
52.7
105
70-130
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
50
48.7
97
70-130
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
50
52.8
106
70-130
Trichloroethene
ug/L
50
56.6
113
70-130
Trichlorofluoromethane
ug/L
50
64.0
128
70-130
Vinyl acetate
ug/L
100
93.3
93
70-130
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
50
50.2
100
70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
107
70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
120
70-130
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
%
103
70-130
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
98
70-130
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
871213
871214
MS
MSD
92138061007
Spike
Spike
MS
MSD
MS MSD
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result
Conc.
Conc.
Result
Result
% Rec % Rec
Limits
RPD Qual
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
56.3
54.6
113
109
70-130
3
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
66.1
66.2
132
132
70-130
0 MO
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
49.5
50.2
99
100
70-130
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
59.2
58.9
118
118
70-130
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
57.0
55.5
114
111
70-130
3
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
ND
50
50
61.0
58.1
122
116
70-130
5
1,1-Dichloropropene
ug/L
ND
50
50
60.5
58.8
121
118
70-130
3
1,2,3-Tdchlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
52.9
52.8
106
106
70-130
0
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ug/L
ND
50
50
52.4
48.6
105
97
70-130
7
1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
53.5
55.3
107
111
70-130
3
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
48.5
51.0
97
102
70-130
5
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ug/L
ND
50
50
47.2
44.8
94
90
70-130
5
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ug/L
ND
50
50
53.6
50.5
107
101
70-130
6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
50.7
51.9
101
104
70-130
2
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
63.4
60.4
127
121
70-130
5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
ND
50
50
55.1
55.5
110
111
70-130
1
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
50.0
50.8
100
102
70-130
2
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
49.0
51.9
98
104
70-130
6
1,3-Dichloropropane
ug/L
ND
50
50
51.2
48.1
102
96
70-130
6
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
50.3
52.6
101
105
70-130
5
2,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
ND
50
50
67.8
65.7
136
131
70-130
3 MO
2-Butanone (MEK)
ug/L
ND
100
100
102
95.8
102
96
70-130
6
2-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
ND
50
50
48.0
49.2
96
98
70-130
2
2-Hexanone
ug/L
ND
100
100
99.5
87.3
99
87
70-130
13
4-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
ND
50
50
49.5
51.3
99
103
70-130
4
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ug/L
ND
100
100
107
104
107
104
70-130
3
Acetone
ug/L
ND
100
100
113
102
113
102
70-130
10
Benzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
56.6
56.8
113
114
70-130
0
Bromobenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
45.5
47.3
91
95
70-130
4
Bromochloromethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
63.0
58.9
126
118
70-130
7
Date: 11 /14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 37 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

eAnaVical
/ »�vwcpeufabs.cam
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kinsey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
871213
871214
MS
MSD
92138061007
Spike
Spike
MS
MSD
MS
MSD
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result
Conc.
Conc.
Result
Result
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD Qual
Bromodichloromethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
61.7
62.4
123
125
70-130
1
Bromoform
ug/L
ND
50
50
64.1
60.4
128
121
70-130
6
Bromomethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
52.1
57.1
104
114
70-130
9
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
ND
50
50
67.8
79.7
136
159
70-130
16 MO
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
56.2
55.2
112
110
70-130
2
Chloroethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
65.8
63.8
132
128
70-130
3 MO
Chloroform
ug/L
ND
50
50
62.4
58.8
125
118
70-130
6
Chloromethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
51.0
50.3
102
101
70-130
1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
ND
50
50
55.4
53.4
111
107
70-130
4
cis- 1,3-Dichloroprope ne
ug/L
ND
50
50
57.7
57.4
115
115
70-130
1
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
55.0
55.4
110
111
70-130
1
Dibromomethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
65.7
66.2
131
132
70-130
1 MO
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
59.0
56.9
118
114
70-130
4
Diisopropyl ether
ug/L
ND
50
50
50.2
48.8
100
98
70-130
3
Ethylbenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
55.5
56.3
111
113
70-130
1
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ug/L
ND
50
50
59.8
63.0
120
126
70-130
5
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ug/L
ND
50
50
55.4
54.1
111
108
70-130
2
m&p-Xylene
ug/L
ND
100
100
115
113
115
113
70-130
1
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ug/L
ND
50
50
56.3
55.1
113
110
70-130
2
Methylene Chloride
ug/L
ND
50
50
53.6
21.9
107
44
70-130
84 MO,R1
n-Butylbenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
49.0
51.6
98
103
70-130
5
n-Propylbenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
48.5
50.8
97
102
70-130
5
Naphthalene
ug/L
ND
50
50
47.2
47.7
94
95
70-130
1
o-Xylene
ug/L
ND
50
50
51.7
53.1
103
106
70-130
3
p-Isopropyltoluene
ug/L
ND
50
50
52.2
54.5
104
109
70-130
4
sec-Butylbenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
49.8
52.6
100
105
70-130
5
Styrene
ug/L
ND
50
50
56.5
53.6
113
107
70-130
5
tert-Butyl Alcohol
ug/L
ND
500
500
799
676
160
135
70-130
17 MO
tert-Butylbenzene
ug/L
ND
50
50
50.2
52.1
100
104
70-130
4
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
ND
50
50
64.2
61.9
126
121
70-130
4
Toluene
ug/L
ND
50
50
61.2
57.5
122
115
70-130
6
trans- 1 2-Dich I oroethene
ug/L
ND
50
50
55.8
54.1
112
108
70-130
3
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
ND
50
50
61.9
58.0
124
116
70-130
6
Trichloroethene
ug/L
ND
50
50
62.9
62.5
126
125
70-130
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
ug/L
ND
50
50
73.3
67.9
147
136
70-130
8 MO
Vinyl acetate
ug/L
ND
100
100
101
96.8
101
97
70-130
4
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
ND
50
50
55.2
56.5
110
113
70-130
2
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
109
96
70-130
4-Bromofluo robe n zene (S)
%
116
108
70-130
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
%
105
104
70-130
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
97
101
70-130
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 38 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

�eAnalytical*
WWWpecalabs.com
i
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
DEFINITIONS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
QUALIFIERS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PRL - Pace Reporting Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean -Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether, Styrene, and Vinyl chloride.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
TNI - The NELAC Institute.
LABORATORIES
PASI-C Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
LO Analyte recovery in the laboratory control sample (LCS) was outside QC limits.
MO Matrix spike recovery and/or matrix spike duplicate recovery was outside laboratory control limits.
R1 RPD value was outside control limits.
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 39 of 40

1 W* paeeteb&com
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: BEA 11-02
Pace Project No.: 92138061
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch
92138061001
MW-6
EPA 8260
MSV21065
92138061002
MW-12D
EPA 8260
MSV21065
92138061003
MW-1
EPA 8260
MSV21065
92138061004
BESS-5
EPA 8260
MSV21065
92138061005
BESS-6
EPA 8260
MSV21065
92138061006
BESS-7
EPA 8260
MSV21065
92138061007
BESS-4
EPA 8260
MSV21068
92138061008
MW-33
EPA 8260
MSV21068
92138061009
MW-19
EPA 8260
MSV21068
92138061010
MW-18
EPA 8260
MSV21068
92138061011
MW-15R
EPA 8260
MSV21068
92138061012
MW-14D
EPA 8260
MSV21068
92138061013
MW-21 D
EPA 8260
MSV21068
Analytical
Analytical Method Batch
Date: 11/14/2012 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 40 of 40
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

,1 !2eAnaW' al'
CHAIN -OF- USTODY / Analytical Request Document
The Chain-of-CuIs a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All relevant fields must be completed accurately.
I
Section A r Section f3
Section C
Page:r of 2—
Required Client Intomration: Required PmJect [..Formation:
Invoice Inlbrmaton:
A>�� ,,:
1566648
�°�CRA cam' L ENO"
Report To: E
lQE /2/Q7 A110-ky-MA �
/7
Address:
A 04013K��tw i�'
Copy To:
Company Name:
REGULATORY:AOENCY
Sw�rE 29- Z l 2�j(mt
Address:
(- NPDES 1" GROUND WATER DRINKING WATER
(� UST (— RCRA i- OTHER
End To: L2urchaw
iCIKAIJ 4 RAJS4 dvl
Order No.: *
Pea QuoM
Reference:
Ph Z . 2
Fa:c
Projad Noma: p Q A I (_ p
rJ
wed
Site Location
4ie C
STAiE:
Requested Due DaterTAT:
Project Number
Requested
Analysis
Filtered
(YM)
Section D Matrix Codes
Required0lant 10mm9eOn MATRIX I CODE
COLLECTED
PreServadves
Z
s.
Drrrdrg Wular DW
Water Wi
a
y
0
F
i
WeateWeter WW
Product P
y
4
m
cauaosrrE
sTArlr
COMMUTE
QIOYCiRhB
N
,
a
Z
Soil/SL
}
SAMPLE ID mpgSolld w
[�`/I�J��
(A-Z 0-9 / r) Air AR
Sample IDe MUST BE UNIQUE Tissue TS
p
O
w
a
Z
Q
b
O
(/
, — " 'C 1
q;�
Other OT
U�,
—p
cis
:3
g
a
a'0
lm
L
DATE
TIME
DATE
TIME
_
_
=
Z
'Z
i
.y
Pace Project Nol Lab I.D.
w—(Is
wrG
uo1
ka
131
9Q�7
2
INWi
%'Obi
X
x
a
I%E55 — 5
ia2n
5
s -
iazd
X
A z
7
—
12Z
e
-3
i3lS
9
1
i 1
10
w —
,2
1N P�{D
ao%++
ADDfTIONAL COMMENTS
REUNQUIS ED BY 1 AFFILIATION
DATE
TIME
ACCEPTED BY 1 AFFILIA
DATE
TIME
SAMPLE CONDITIONS
i
i
I
SAMPLER NAME AND S1 1
RE- .:
_o
`!
ORIGINAL
�
PRINT
NT Marne of $AM
�
F
—�'
m
E
SIGNATURE of SAM
DATE Signed
(MUMDFyn:
'tnponant Note: By WWdrg the Form you are accepting Pace's NET 30 day payment leans and agi a1 to late ctw rgas aF f.S% ps"-u for any h. not pad "in 30 aye. F-ALL-Q-020rev.07, 15-May-2007

ceAnal{/tical'
CHAIN -OF USTODY / Analytical Request Document
The ChaBrof-C ustod is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All releventlfelds rmot be completed accurately.
Section A Section B
I Section C
�� 2-of Z
RegWred Client Information: Regtdred Project Information:
Involos Intarmadon:
�
1601951
Company:
ClQ6 GfoL.. J -CA/V.
Report To: /� 06W w oACXM.4 �
Address:
ae.A 5"Zf"f I-h.
Copy To:
C�nym Na;
REt3ULATAl2YAGENCY .
:5- Z 7 -26 jt 29� i
�
Address:
r NPDES T GROUND WATER DRINKING WATER
UST R(2A r OTHER
Email To: ALJD lK �iN
rC
Purchase Order No.:
a
RofererZw
Fax
Project Name:
pue
Sitie Location
STATE.
ed Due DataITAT: '
Project Number.
° pO�
Requested
Analysts
Filtered
(YM)
Section D M2trirz Codes
x
n.vrrn.erxe t iormal{en MATRIX CODE
a
COLLECTED
Preservativea
>
og
Ddnldrg Water DW
O
water WT
waatewater ww
p
COgri"rrE
w
Z
ssolusoload sL
o
N
�►
SAMPLE ID aWlwe ,a
d
<
w
(A-7, 0-91;) Air AR
Sample IDs MUST BE UNIQUE Tleaue TS
p
O
w
a
Z
H
H
r0
O
U
b U
Other OT
O
m
#
X
U
p
O
_-�'
CL
tV
DATE TIME
DATE
TIME
_
_
_z
Para Project NoJ Lab I.D.
w
G
tl it
2
3
4
5
8
7
!
e
1
9
10
i
11
12
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
REL
BY/AFFIWITION
DATE
TIME.
ACCEPTED BY I AFFILIATION
DATE
TIME
SAMPLE CONDITIONS
►t
i
SAMPLER NAME AND
RE
O
ro
ORIGINAL PRINT Flame ofSAM'
$ 0
Siwwd=i
1! E Zb 12
SIGNATURE of SAY
~
vDATE
N
I
(�
9n*DrWd Note: BY *rdrg ads f— you are rg Pace's NET 90 day payr m more and agraeN to late charges al 1.5% parr } Wo Warrytmotcea not p* w*M 30 days. F-ALL-Q-020rev.07, t May-2007

Document
civic
Authority.
(__-116"yft1'
I F-CHR-CS-03-rev.08 Pace Huntersville Quality Office
Client Name: C:. Project # q,_�13�>o &
Where Received: Zj Huntersville ❑ Asheville ❑ Eden ❑ Raleigh
Courier: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ UPS❑ USPSO Client❑ Commerclal❑ Pace Other
Custody Seat on Cooler/Box.Prosent: ❑ yes no Seals Intact: ❑ yes ❑ no
-PackingMaterial; Bubble Wrap Bubble 8 s
❑ P � el9 ❑ None Other
Thermometer Used: IR Ou T1101 T1102 Type of Ice. W Blue None ] Samples on ice, coding process has begun
Temp Correction Factor 101: No Correction T1102: No Correction
is Frozen:
Dais and Initi�l Of pe o examining
Corroded Gooier Temp.: C Biological Tissue Yes N N�
contents:S / Z.
-Temp should be above freezing -to 6 C Comments:
Chain of Custody Present: idyes ❑No ❑NiA
1.
Chain of Custody Filled Out: J&es ❑No ❑NA
2.
Chain of Custody Relinquished: es ❑No ❑NA
3.
Sampler Name & Signature on COC: ss ❑No DNA
4.
Samples Arrived within Hold Time: Yes ❑No ❑NA
5.
Short Hold Time Analysis A2hr : No ❑NA
8.
Rush Turn Around TimeRequested: ❑Yes No DNA
7.
Sufficient Volume: Yes'ONO ❑NA
8.
Correct Containers Used: f�'Yas ❑No ❑NA
9.
-Pace Containers Used: / Yes ❑No DNA
Containers Intact Yes ONO DNA
10.
l=iltered volume received for Dissolved tests ❑Yes ❑No ONIA
11.
Sample Labels match COC: Yes ❑No DNA
12.
-Includes date/tlme/ID/Ana is Matrix
All containers needing preservation have been checked.
❑Yes ❑No C INA
13.
All containers needing preservation are found to be In ❑Yes ❑No FC NA
compliance with EPA recommendation.
ezceptlow VOA, colNorm, TOC, O&G, WI-DRO (water) ❑Yea •❑No
InKW when completed
Sam les checked for dechlodnadon: ❑Yes ❑No NA
14.
Heads ace in VOA Vials >Omm , Dyes oNo ❑NA
15.
Trip Blank Present: Dyes LINO I? WA
16.
Trip Blank Custody Seals Present ❑Yes ❑No �NIA
1
Pace Trip Blank Lot # purchased):
Client Notification/ Resolution: Field Data Required? Y / N
Person Contacted: Datefrime:
Comments/ Resolution:
SCURF Review: Date: L2SRF Review: I 111ate: 1/11 q Z
Note: Whenever there Is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance samples, a copy of this form vAil be sent to the North Carolina DEHNR
Certification Office ( i.e out of hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, Incorrect containers)

APPENDIX V
BIOREMEDIATION INJECTION LOG

CRB GEOLOGICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION INJECTION LOG
B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577 CRB
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, NC
Injection
Point
7/24/06
EOS 5:1
(g�)
8/9/06
EOS 5:1
(gal)
9/26/06
EOS 5:1
(gal)
7/11/07
EOS 5:1
(gal)
6/9/08
NZ 5:1
(gal)
6/13/11
NZ 5:1
(gal)
11/14/11
NZ 5:1
(gal)
11/15/11
NZ 5:1
(gal)
11/16/11
NZ 5:1
10/9/12
NZ 5:1
(gal)
10/10/12
NZ 5:1
(gal)
Total
Fluid
Volume
(gas)
Total
a -donor
{ Ibs)
Al
133
125
55
400
835
180
-
-
1728
1200
A2
87
44
55
15
12
-
102
170
485
348
A3
204
164
55
258
204
500
634
300
-
2319
1615
B1
119
153
55
50
10
-
-
188
192
767
562
B2
57
94
55
25
21
-
300
-
552
396
B3
167
161
55
105
1029
300
1817
1273
Cl
139
187
85
375
1000
-
1786
1252
C2
71
50
55
5
4
176
150
511
363
C3
125
146
110
40
137
315
300
-
1173
833
C4
168
-
166
70
94
-
369
92
236
1195
859
C5
123
126
85
125
-
-
-
459
352
C6
27
60
80
215
382
271
C7
134
349
85
-
568
469
C8
108
278
135
50
571
453
C9
101
311
55
54
350
521
658
CIO
120
80
50
-
-
250
204
C11
84
39
35
-
158
128
D1
93
48
80
37
258
198
D2
108
109
130
290
-
637
465
D3
133
201
110
460
300
904
865
D4
249
304
220
422
205
1195
1037
D5
88
106
34
55
10
-
293
238
D6
28
27
33
55
25
168
128
D7
115
-
210
600
630
1555
1097
D8
75
-
-
-
75
64
D9
60
60
51
D1O
18
18
15
F1
112
-
404
255
550
1321
977
F2
109
156
200
1132
1597
1114
F3
108
135
165
860
1268
891
F4
101
269
110
-
480
389
F5
118
197
110
425
342
F6
86
-
299
80
465
382
G1
-
305
-
55
360
297
G2
90
-
55
145
113
G3
203
-
55
258
210
G4
180
-
55
235
190
G5
86
-
55
141
110
All Total 1 4.809 864 248 5,322 4 990 6,227 1,082 2,850 1,318 2,263 1,098 1 30,216 22,813
IW Total 1 3 864 133 4,932 3,620 6,227 1 2,850 1,318 2,263 1,098 1 27100 20,409
Newman Zone: 45% Soybean Oil / 4% Lactate. -40 Mol H per pound of oil
EOS: 60% Soybean Oil / 4% Lactate.
1 of 1

APPENDIX VI
PCE IN GROUNDWATER
CONCENTRATION TRENDS

B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 7' `%" CRB
PCE Concentrations in the Fairchild Shed Area
MW-1
10000
1000 Soil Excavation and SVE
Started
J
�
100 it
7
it Ib
10
1
01/96 12/97 12/99 12/01 12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
M W-28
100
J
7
J
7
10
1 '
01/96 12/97 12/99 12/01
100
10
1
01/96 12/97 12/99 12/01 12/03 12/05 12/07
12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
MW-7
12/09 12/11 12/13
1 of 4

B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
PCE Concentrations in the Courtyard Area
MW-30
.-... �/CRB
100000
10000
J 1000
o\iD Bioremediation Injection
100 Begins
10
1
01/96 12/97 12/99 12/01 12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
M W-6
100000
10000
J 1000
VW
3 100
10
1
01/96 12/97 12/99 12/01 12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
MW-12D
1000
100
10
01/96 12/97 12/99 12/01 12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
D-7
10000
1000
J
100
7
10
1
01/96 12/97 12/99 12/01 12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
2 of 4

B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577 Osl
'
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina .Y /'���
PCE Concentrations in the Northwestern Area
MWA
100
J
10 Bioremediation Injection
Begins
1
01/96 12/97 12/99 12/01 12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
MW-18
1000
100
J
7
1
01/96 12/97 12/99 12/01 12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
MW-19
1000
100
oc
10
1
01/96 12/97 12/99 12/01 12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
MW-20
1000
100
J
7
in
1
01/96 12/97 12/99 12/01 12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
3 of 4

B/E Aerospace Facility, NCD060302577
1455 Fairchild Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; .;..... rCRB
Ni
PCE Concentrations in the Hazardous Waste Storage Area
MW-21D
10000
J
1000
i
-
vwBioremediation
Injection
Begins
100
01/96
12/97 12/99 12/01
12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
MW-14D
10000
m
1000
OM a
100
01/96
12/97 12/99 12/01
12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
MW-15R
1nnnn
100
01/96 12/97 12/99 12/01 12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
1
MW-24
0000
J "
1000
7
100
01/96 12/97 12/99 12/01 12/03 12/05 12/07 12/09 12/11 12/13
4of4