20100627 Ver 1_More Info Received_20100810

Letter of Transmittal
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Blvd. ?tS&ME
Charlotte, NC 28273
[phone]
[phone] fax
North Carolina DENR, DWQ
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
WE ARE SENDING YOU
? Shop drawings
® Copy of letter
DATE: August 9, 2010 JOB NO: 1357-10-028
ATTENTION: Mr. Ian McMillan
RE: Southridge Parkway Extension NOV
I O - O LP 1

® Attached ? Under separate cover via
? Prints ? Plans ? Draft
® Report
5.r)!
-the followrig items:
? Specifications
COPIES DATE NO DESCRIPTION
5 8.9.2010 1 Southridge Parkway NOV Response / After-the-Fact WQC 3821 Request
1 8.6.2010 2 Check for $570.00 Processing Fee
1 8.2.2010 3 Copy of letter requesting additional information / copies / check
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
® For approval
? As requested
? FORBIDS DUE:
? For your record
? For review and comment ?
? PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
jRtr-ZiLe0y1[#I
AUG 1 C 2010
WETWOV N MVAT??gTE BRANCH
REMARKS: Mr. McMillan- In response to you 8.2.2010 letter (attached) Dlease find the additional conies of the PCN / Response
letter pertaining to the Southridge Parkway Extension Project (DWQ# 10-0627). Rather than sending four additional copies and
replacement copies for page 5 of 11 on the PCN form, we are sending 5 new original copies along with the check for the
processing fee. If you reauire anv more information or have anv additional questions feel free to call me at 704-523-4726.
Thanks.
- Dave Homans
SIGN:
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT ONCE.
This Letter of Transmittal and the documents accompanying this Letter of Transmittal contain information from S&ME, Inc., which is confidential and legally
privileged. The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity named on this Letter of Transmittal. If you are not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on these documents is strictly prohibited.
S&ME SFG-001
(Rev. 04/04)
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
August 2, 2010
CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Gaston County Economic Development Commission
Gary D. Hicks, Jr.
PO Box 2339
Gastonia, North Carolina 28052
DWQ Project # 10-0627
Gaston County
Subject Property: Southridge Parkway Extension (NOV - After The Fact)
Application Sets and Fee
Dcar NI,-. `.!:?k'-,
On June 29, 2010 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application set for the above
referenced project. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided
inaccurate information as discussed below.
Additional Information Requested:
® The 401 Certification cannot be processed until five (5) complete sets of the application and
associated maps are received at the DWQ Central Office in Raleigh along with the appropriate
fee. Please supply four (4) more application sets signed and dated.
Any large scale maps that are provided please include a copy of the site plans on CD. One (1)
data CD of full sized plans in TIFF Group 4 format (black and white, not grayscale or color).
If the plans are too large to store in TIFF formant, they can be stored in PDF.
You may also use FTP site and email them to [e-mail] Ms. Strickland can
be reached at [phone] if you need further clarification.
® The correct fee to remit is $570. You have submitted a major water quality application:
greater than or equal to one acre of wetlands/waters and/or greater than or equal to 150 feet of
streams (intermittent or perennial).
® Page 5 of I 1 under Stream Impacts, section 3G for S2 and S3 show approximate impacts.
DWQ will need exact and specific impacts not approximations to review and approve this
project. Please supply one (1) original and four (4) copies of page 5 of 11.
Please submit this information within 30 calendar days of the date of this letter. If you will not be able to
provide the requested information within that timeframe, please provide written confirmation that you
intend to provide the requested information, and include a specific timetable delineating when the
requested materials will be provided. If we do not hear from you in 30 calendar days, we will assume that
you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as returned. Please be aware
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd.,Ste 250 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq
NonrthCarohna
Naturalltf
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
that any impacts requested within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please
call Ian McMillan or me at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Ian McMillan, Acting Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
IJM/ jd
cc: USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office, 151 Patton Ave., Rm 208, Asheville NC 28801-5006
S&ME, D. David Homans, 9751 Southern Pine Blvd., Charlotte NC 28273
File Copy
Filename N O V V_(?astor,_Lield_rleedSets_Fee
ItS&ME
July 15, 2010
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Attn: Mr. John Hennessy
NPS Assistance and Compliance Oversight Unit
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Attention: Ms. Marcia Allocoo
Acting Regional Supervisor
Reference: NOV Response Letter and Restoration Plan
Southridge Parkway Extension
Bessemer City, North Carolina
DWQ Incident No. 202001679 and NOV-2010-WQ-0032
S&ME Project No. 1357-10-028
Dear Mr. Hennessy and Ms. Allocoo:
On behalf of the Gaston County and the Gaston County Economic Development
Commission (GCEDC), S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is submitting this response letter and
restoration plan in accordance with requirements of your June 11, 2010 Notice of
Violation (NOV) issued to the GCEDC in regard to the Southridge Parkway Extension
site. A copy of the NOV is included as an attachment to this letter. This response has
been developed in accordance with the Professional Services Subcontract Addendum 3
between S&ME and Woolpert Inc. for Woopert Project Number 6827 and in accordance
with S&ME Proposal No. 1357-23020-1OREV.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The subject property consists of an approximately 55-acre tract located on the south side
of the Norfolk Southern railroad and east of East Maine Avenue between the Dole Foods
site and Gastonia Highway in Bessemer City, North Carolina. The property is currently
being developed for future industrial uses. The current development consists of roadway
construction along the southern portion of the property, site grading and clearing for
development along the northern part of the property, and grading associated with
stormwater retention features. The location of the project site is depicted by the Site
Vicinity Map (Figure 1) and the appropriate USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2).
S&ME, INC. / 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard / Charlotte, NC 28273-5560 / p 704.523.4726 f 704.525.3953 / www.smeinc.com
NOV Response, Restoration Plan, and After-the-Fact NWP 39 Permitting SWE Project No. 1357-10-028
Southridge Parkway Extension, Bessemer City, NC July 15 2010
Prior to development, jurisdictional delineation services were performed by S&ME on
this property and on an approximately 2-acre portion of land south of the property on
August 22, 2008 and March 5, 2009, respectively. During these delineations, a drainage
feature located within the western portion of the subject property was identified as a non-
jurisdictional stormwater channel. The same feature was also identified as non-
jurisdictional by STV / Ralph Whitehead Associates (STV/RWA) in a Preliminary
Jurisdictional Delineation report dated March 18, 2008.
Since the time of these reports, hydrological conditions have changed on site. Following
clearing of the site and initial grading associated with the road crossing and stormwater
retention features in early spring 2010, it came to the attention of the Project Coordinator
that the drainage feature was exhibiting relatively continuous flow. Following the
recommendation of the project erosion control inspector for North Carolina Department
of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), the site was visited by Mike
Burkhard of NCDENR Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Surface Water Protection
section to determine the current jurisdictional status of the channel. During this site visit,
which was attended by representatives of GCEDC, Woolpert, S&ME, and STV/RWA,
Mr. Burkhard determined that, in its current condition, the channel would be considered
an intermittently flowing jurisdictional stream. Mr. Burkhard also identified the
jurisdictional origin of the channel. This jurisdictional call was later verified during a
June 3, 2010 site visit that included Alan Johnson of DWQ and Steve Chapin from the
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (USACE). Following the initial field meeting with Mr.
Burkhard, all work on the site in the vicinity of the channel was halted.
On June 14, 2010, the channel was delineated in the field by David Homans of S&ME,
along with a small, jurisdictional wetland feature abutting the channel. The surveyed
location of these features, along with an approximation of the currently constructed
project components, can be seen in the attached Approximate Existing Site Conditions
Map (Figure 3). Photographs of site conditions at the time of this site visit are also
attached and their locations are depicted on Figure 3.
On June 15, 2010, GCEDC received the aforementioned NOV regarding impacts to this
channel. In total, an estimated 1,140 linear feet (If) were identified as having been
impacted. Specifically, the following impacts were observed:
An unauthorized 48-inch culvert of approximately 200 feet in length was installed
in the stream channel.
Sediment has impacted the channel due to land disturbing activities in and around
the stream.
Sediment depths of 2 to 6 inches were observed in the upper 600 feet of the
channel.
In order to address these unauthorized impacts, the NOV requested a response to the
following items:
An explanation of the plans to restore the pattern, profile, and dimension of the
impacted channel to allow for passage of water and aquatic life. (see Section IJ)
NOV Response, Restoration Plan, and After-the-Fact NWP 39 Permitting S&ME Project No. 1357-10-028
Southridge Parkway Extension, Bessemer City NC July 15 2010
• An explanation of the plans to stabilize the stream banks to prevent further
sediment deposition in the channel (See Section II).
• An application for after-the-fact 404 / 401 permits (See Section III and attached
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) form).
• A revision of the approved construction documents reflecting removal of
stormwater and sediment control BMPs from their current location in line with the
jurisdictional channel (See Section 1).
• A plan for mitigation of impacts at the site, should it be required (See Section III).
• A detailed schedule with dates of proposed actions, including dates when
restoration will begin and when the project will be complete (See Section Ii).
We have addressed each of the items identified above in the following numbered sections
of this response letter (response section are noted in parentheses above). Upon approval
from your office, Gaston County is prepared to undertake the necessary remedial
measures.
1. PROJECT RE-DESIGN
In order to address the concerns identified in the NOV and to minimize permanent
impacts to the channel to the extent practicable, the grading and site layout plan for the
project is being modified in the vicinity of the channel. Included in the proposed
modifications are the following:
The 48-inch culvert that allows the channel to pass under Southridge Parkway
Extension will be reduced at its downstream end from approximately 200 If in length
to 148 If. In order to allow for passage of aquatic organisms, the existing standpipe
apparatus at the upstream end of the culvert will be removed and converted into a
headwall so that the upstream restored channel can be tied to the culvert at the existing
invert elevation.
2. The in-line bio-retention basin and wet ponds that were partially constructed will be
removed and replaced off-line from the channel. The bio-retention basin (which the
channel was previously piped underneath) will be split into two basins, and the wet
ponds will be replaced with smaller ponds located to the east. The proposed
modifications will allow for an approximately 30-foot wide riparian buffer along the
restored channel between its outfall from the culvert under Southridge Parkway
Extension and its tie-in to the undisturbed channel to the south.
The settling basin that had been partially constructed to the north of Southridge
Parkway Extension will be graded to create a gentle slope which will allow overland
flow into the channel. The channel and adjacent riparian area will be restored within
the footprint of the former settling basin and tied in to the existing culvert at its current
invert elevation.
4. The original grading plan in the vicinity of the upper 6591f of channel will be
redesigned to tie in to existing contours within 30 feet of the existing channel
centerline in a manner that will allow for a 50-foot restored vegetated buffer around
the channel upstream of Southridge Parkway.
NOV Response, Restoration Plan, and After-the-Fact NWP 39 Permitting SWE Project No. 1357-10-028
Southridge Parkway Extension, Bessemer City. NC July 15 2010
For an approximate depiction of the proposed design modifications, please see the
attached Restoration Plan Map (Figure 4). At the time of this letter, the full, finalized
grading modifications have not been completed by the project engineer (Woolpert). It is
estimated that these finalized plans will be available for your review at the date specified
in Table 3 (see section IV).
11. CHANNEL RESTORATION / STABILIZATION PLANS
Gaston County proposes a number of restoration measures to re-establish the pattern,
profile and dimension of the approximately 4961inear feet of stream channel that have
been graded or filled for the existing stormwater BMPs. In these areas, a restoration
channel pattern will be generated to match the l -foot contours taken from a May 5, 2008
pre-construction survey. Channel thalweg elevation will be designed to match the pre-
construction survey elevation to the extent practicable. In some instances, modifications
from the original profile will have to occur in order to transition to the existing culvert
invert elevations; these transitions will be spread over a length of channel to avoid steep
and potentially unstable channel gradients.
The hydrologic nature of this channel has proven to be somewhat in flux and no typical
undisturbed upstream or downstream reference reach js available. For these reasons, we
propose to establish typical cross-sectional dimensions for the restored channel based on
hydrologic modeling, rather than reference reach observation. These typical channel
cross-sections will be developed based on stable natural channel design principles and
parameters generated from HEC-RAS modeling of the watershed using applicable
regional curves. The restoration channel dimensions will be designed so that bankfull
profile will accommodate flows associated with the predicted 2-year recurrence peak
flow events.
For an approximate depiction of the areas where full channel restoration is proposed,
please see the attached Restoration Plan Map (Figure 4). At the time of this letter,
detailed typical cross-sectional profiles have not been completed by the project stream
restoration engineer (S&ME). It js estimated that these finalized plans will be available
for your review and incorporation into the re-designed grading plan at the date specified
in the attached schedule of dates (see section IV).
Channel banks within restored reaches will be matted from the top-of-bank to toe-of
slope with coir matting (or equivalent) and seeded with the riparian seed mix described in
Table 1. The seed mix will be applied from the banks to an area 10 feet upland of the
banks and at a rate of 40 pounds per acre (approximately 5 pounds per 5,000 square feet).
Affected areas will be overseeded with 40 pounds per acre of an equal mix of
(approximately 5 pounds per 5,000 square feet) of annual rye grain (Secale cereale),
Korean lespedeza (Kummerowia stipulacea) and millet (Setaria italica).
4
NOV Response, Restoration Plan, and After-the-Fact NWP 39 Permitting SBME Project No. 1357-10-028
Southridge Parkway Extension Bessemer Citv NC July 15 2010
Table 1: Riparian Seed Mix Composition
Common Name Scientific Name Percentage
Deertongue Tioga Dichanthelium clandestinum 10
Partridge pea Chamaecrista fasciculata 15
Pennsylvania smartweed Polygonum pennsylvanicum 25
River oats Chasmanthium latifolium 10
Swamp sunflower Helianthus angustifolius 5
Switchgrass Panicum virgatum 10
Tear-thumb Polygonum sagittatum 5
Virginia wild rye Elymus virginicus 10
Wingstem Verbesina alternifolia 10
In the upper 659 if of the channel where disturbance of the banks and riparian area has
occurred but grading has not, a different restoration approach will be used in order to limit
further disturbance from construction equipment. Areas where active bank erosion is
occurring will be marked in the field, stabilized with coir matting, and seeded as described
above. Areas along this reach where the banks appear stable will be allowed to continue to
re-vegetate naturally with volunteer species.
Within this reach, there are a number of areas where excessive sediment deposition has
occurred due to upslope erosion and bank sloughing. In these areas, excessive sediment
will be removed from the channel thalweg in order to allow for more effective passage of
water. In these areas of excessive deposition, efforts will be made to approximate the
cross-sectional dimensions generated for downstream sections of the stream. Sediment
deposited in the floodplain that has started to stabilize into vegetated wetland areas will not
be disturbed.
A vegetated riparian buffer will be established along the stream channel in all restoration
areas. This buffer will extend 50 feet landward of the centerline of the channel upstream of
the Southridge Parkway Extension. Due to space constraints associated with installation of
the required storm basins, the riparian buffer will extend 30 feet from the channel
downstream of the road crossing. In cleared areas where volunteer vegetation has begun to
re-grow and restoration disturbance is to be kept to a minimum (Restoration Area A, Figure
4), native woody shrub species will be planted throughout the riparian buffer area in
accordance with the planting plan outlined in Table 2. Use of live stakes and bare-root
seedlings is not proposed due to high mortality rates associated with their planting outside
of the dormant season. Accordingly, use of small tree bands is proposed as an alternative.
In areas where earthmoving will occur within the riparian buffer zone (Restoration Area B,
Figure 4), the entire buffer zone will be seeded with 40 pounds per acre of an equal mix of
annual rye grain (Secale cereale), Korean lespedeza (Kummerowia stipulacea) and millet
(Selaria italica) in addition to being planted with the shrub species outline in Table 2.
5
NOV Response, Restoration Plan, and After-the-Fact NWP 39 Permitting SBME Project No. 1357-10-028
Southridge Parkway Extension Bessemer Citv NC July 15 2010
Table 2: Planting Plan
Bank-side Species
(planted within 5 feet of top of bank)
Select two or more of the followin'
Common Name Scientific Name Spacing
Arrowwood Viburnum dentatum 4 feet on horizontal center
Black willow Salix nigra 4 feet on horizontal center
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 4 feet on horizontal center
Silky dogwood Corpus amomum 4 feet on horizontal center
Silky willow Salix sericea 4 feet on horizontal center
Riparian Upland 'Species
(planted from bank-side area to edge of riparian restoration buffer)
Select two or more of the followin :
Common Name Scientific Name Comments
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra 10 feet or less on center
Box elder Acer negundo 10 feet or less on center
Spicebush Lindera benzoin 10 feet or less on center
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 10 feet or less on center
Wax myrtle Morella cerifera 10 feet or less on center
Beautyberry E] :Calfficcarpaa americana 10 feet or less on center
Silky dogwood
'S rpus amomum 10 feet or less on center
pecies and quantities subject to change based on availability at time of planting. Substitutions shall be
approved by an SBME Ecologist.
Ill. PROJECT 401/404 PERMITTING
As identified previously in section I of this response, 148 If of jurisdictional intermittent
stream channel will be lost due to the culverted crossing under the Southridge Parkway
Extension. For this reason we are seeking authorization in accordance with North
Carolina Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3821 for these impacts. Attached is an
after-the-fact PCN Form outlining how the proposed project complies with the regulatory
considerations outlined in WQC No. 3821. According to telephone conversations
between Mr. Steve Chapin and Mr. David Homans, the USACE will not require after-the-
fact authorization under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 39 for this project so long as
points identified in the NOV are adequately addressed by this response letter. Should
federal 404 permitting be required, please consider the attached PCN Form as a request
for authorization under NWP 39.
The proposed modification to this project involves no permanent wetland impacts and
less than the 150 if of permanent jurisdictional stream loss that serves as the threshold for
NOV Response, Restoration Plan, and After-the-Fact NWP 39 Permitting SWE Project No. 1357-10-028
Southridoe Parkway Extension Bessemer City NC July 15 2010
requiring compensatory mitigation. Permanent impacts to the channel have been avoided
and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Accordingly, we do not anticipate
that Gaston County will be required to provide additional compensatory mitigation
beyond the channel restoration activities described above in section II.
IV. SCHEDULE
As construction crews are currently mobilized on site, work associated with restoration
efforts can begin immediately following approval of this NOV response, completion of
the restoration plans, and approval of the required permit modifications. A detailed
proposed response schedule is provided in Table 3. Please note that this schedule is an
estimation and is contingent on modified plan approvals, planting material availability,
etc.
Following completion of restoration activities and site stabilization, the restored areas
will be photo documented. These photographs, along with a brief letter report, will be
provided to the NC DWQ and the USACE to verify that the restoration activities have
satisfactorily completed.
Table 3: Proposed Response Schedule
Response Task Proposed Proposed
Start" Completion"'
Design typical cross-section details for restoration Currently
channel underway 1 week

Re-design grading plan for site Currently
2 weeks
underway
Revise sediment and erosion control plan to reflect Currently
project modifications underway 1 week

Revise stormwater plan to reflect project modifications Currently 2 weeks
underway
Remove existing stormwater features and -52 If of
culvert from the downstream side of the road 3 weeks 5 weeks
Grade restored stream according to design plan, profile
and dimension 5 weeks 7 weeks
Mat unstable banks and remove excess sediment in
upper reach of the channel 7 weeks 8 weeks
Seed banks and riparian buffer areas where proposed 8 weeks 9 weeks
Install b plantings 8 weeks 9 weeks
E
pland grading work not associated with the Currently
underway 8 weeks
Provid e photo documentation of restored conditions to
the NC DWQ and USACE - 10 weeks

-- -r-- --, •••••--- ••••-• v,....,na., ,c.a.cwnIV aNNiuvd, ui uns Ivuv response from the NU
DWQ and the USACE.
7
NOV Response, Restoration Plan, and After-the-Fact NWP 39 Permitting SWE Project No. 1357-10-028
Southridge Parkway Extension Bessemer City NC July 15 2010
CLOSING
We hope that this response letter and restoration plan adequately address the concerns
expressed in your NOV. Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can answer questions
or provide additional information. Hopefully, our client's proactive approach to
addressing these issues has served to minimize associated impacts.
Sincerely,
S&ME
D. David Homans
Natural Resources Staff Professional
Senior reviewed by Dane A. Homa
Joey a er
Natural Resources Project Professional
Attachments: DWQ NOV, dated June 15, 2010
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
Figure 1 - Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 - USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3 - Approximate Existing Site Conditions
Figure 4 - Restoration Plan Map
Site Photographs
cc. Matt Blackwell, GCEDC
Greg Hamish, Woolpert, Inc.
Steve Chapin, USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Mike Burkhard, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
File
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
Dee Freeman
Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
70092250000432656049
Mr. Matt Blackwell
P O Box 1578
Gastonia, NC 28053
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Incident #202001679
NOV- 2010-WO-0032
401 Water Quality Certification
South Ridge Parkway
Gaston County, NC
Dear Mr. Blackwell:
June 11, 2010
On May 11, 2010, Michael W. Burkhard of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) conducted a stream determination call at
the South Ridge Parkway Extension project upon the request of staff of the Division of Land Resources (DLR).
After conducting a visual evaluation and completing the "NC Division of Water Quality Stream Identification Form",
Michael W. Burkhard determined that the water feature on this site is an intermittent stream and waters of the State.
Given the stream determination, the impacts observed at the site are a violation of state rules / regulations.
During the site visit, the following impacts were observed:
• Approximately 1,140 linear feet of intermittent stream has been impacted.
• Sediment has impacted the intermittent stream due to land disturbing activities in and around this stream.
Sediment depths of 2" to 6" were observed in the upper 600 feet of this stream reach.
• An unauthorized 48" culvert approximately 200' in length was installed in the creek channel.
As a result of the site inspection the following violations, detailed below, were noted:
Item I. 401 Water Quality Certification
The culvert installation is in violation of 15A NCAC 2h .0500 unauthorized installations of 200 linear feet of culvert. Water
Quality Certification 3687 allows only 40 linear feet of permanent stream impact with outwritten authorization.
Item 1. Removal of Use
The unauthorized disturbance to the intermittent creek and unpermitted creek crossing represents a violation of
15A NCAC 02B .0211 (2) - The waters shall be suitable for aquatic life propagation and maintenance of biological
integrity, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture; sources of water pollution which preclude any of these
uses on either a short-term or long-term basis shall be considered to be violating a water quality standard.
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 One
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 North Carolina
Inlemet www.ncwaterquality.org //
An Equal Opportunily 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer paper Xatu SQL L#
Mr. Matt Blackwell
Page 2
If you wish any stream impacts to remain in place, you must contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) for information on the type(s) of permits required. Depending on the type of permits the USACE
requires, application for a 401 Water Quality Certification will also be required. Please note that sediment
impacts to streams can not be permitted.
Requested Response
This Office requests that you respond to this letter in writing within 30 days of receipt of this Notice. Your response should
be sent to both this Office at the letterhead address and to the attention of Mr. John Hennessy at the Wetlands and
Stormwater Branch, NPS Assistance and Compliance Oversight Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
1617. Your response should address the following items:
1. Provide an explanation of how you plan to restore the pattern, profile, and dimension of the impacted stream channel
to allow for low flow passage of water and aquatic life.
Provide an explanation of how you plan to stabilize the streambanks to prevent further sediment deposition within the
stream.
3. Submit an application for an after the fact 404 and 401 permits.
4. Have your engineer of record revise the approved construction documents reflecting the removal of all sediment
control devices and proposed stormwater and water quality ponds from being in line with this stream.
5. Mitigation may be required for the proposed impacts at the site. Please contact the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
for guidance in this matter.
6. Provide a detailed schedule with dates explaining when the restoration will begin and the projected completiorrdate. It
is strongly recommended that a person with experience in stream restoration and the States environmental program
be retained.
In addition, this Office is considering sending a recommendation for enforcement to the Director of the Division of Water
Quality regarding these issues and any future/continued violations that may be encountered. Your response to this
correspondence will be considered in this process. This office requires that the violations, as detailed above, be
abated immediately. These violations and any future violations are subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to
$25,000.00 per day for each violation. Should you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact Michael
W. Burkhard or myself at [phone]. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Marcia Allocoo, Acting Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
cc: John Hennessy, NPS Assistance and Compliance Oversight Unit
Steve Chapin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Field Office
Yr. Gregory D. Harnish PE, Woolpert Inc 8731 Red Oak Bv. Su 101 Charlotte NC 28217
r. David Homans, S&ME, 9751 Southern Pine By Charlotte NC 28273
File Copy
10--oLP an
O?O? VJ A 7F9QG
o
E 3
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Southridge Parkway Extension
2b. County: Gaston
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Bessemer City
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Gaston County (Economic Development Comission)
3b. Deed Book and Page No. bk. 4405, pg. 1749
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if

applicable):
Gary D. Hicks, Jr.
3d. Street address: PO Box 2339
3e. City, state, zip: Gastonia, NC 28053
3f. Telephone no.: 704-825-4046
3g. Fax no.: N/A
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: D. David Homans
5b. Business name
(if applicable): S&ME, Inc.
5c. Street address: 9751 Southern Pine Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28273
5e. Telephone no.: 704-523-4726
5f. Fax no.: 704-525-3953
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 3526-46-8426
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.28431 Longitude: - 81.26339
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: Approximately 55 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Oates Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Oates Creek (11-135-5-1), Class C
2c. River basin: Upper Catawba 3050101
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
See Figure 3 for approximate current grading that has occurred on the property. The entire site has been cleared of
vegetation. Prior to the current project development, the site was largely made up of fallow pasture and early
successional areas.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.06 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1,300 LF (pre-construction estimate)
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to extend South Ridge Parkway and to grade the project area for future industrial
development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves the extension of South Ridge Parkway approximately 2,300 LF from the entrance of the Dole Foods
facility to the east to Maine Street on the West side of the project area. Additionally, the project involves grading of the
project area and the addition of stormwater structures to allow for future construction of industrial facilities on the site.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: The channel observed on the western portion of ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
the property (which had been classified as ephemeral / non-
jurisdictional in 2008 by S&ME and STV / Ralph Whitehead)
was determined to be a jurisdictional, intermittently-flowing
stream by both the USACE and NC DWQ in March of 2010.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): The origin of the channel was determined Agency/Consultant Company: S&ME, Inc.
by Mike Burkhard of NC DWQ, and the channel centerline Other:
was delineated in the field by D. David Homans of S&ME.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
See attached NOV, dated June 11, 2010
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T
W1 ? P ®T Clearing ® Yes
? No ® Corps
® DWQ 0.06
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
?No ?DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.06
2h. Comments: The wetland area has been cleared, but will be restored with plantings of scrub / shrub species.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ®P ? T Culverting UT to Oates Creek ? PER
® INT ® Corps
® DWQ 3 148
S2 ? PH T Bank disturbance, UT to Oates Creek ? PER ® Corps 3 659
riparian clearing ® INT ® DWQ

S3 ? P ®T Installation of
Stormwater
UT to Oates Creek
? PER
®INT
® Corps
®DWQ
3
496
features
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ?P?T ?PER ?Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 1303
3i. Comments: All temporary impacts will be restored according to attached restoration plan. Temporary impacts occurred
when the channel was belived to be non-jurisdictional. Impacts associated with culverting under the road have been reduced
from 200 to 148 LF.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open waters are located within the project area.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: No state designated protected riparian buffers will be impacted.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Since the verification of the channel as a jurisdictional feature, the project has been entirely re-designed in order to minimize
permanent impacts to the channel and restore its condition. Re-design elements include: 1) reducing the culverted crossing
from 200 If in length to 148 If in length; 2) removal of all in-line stormwater basins upstream and downstream of the road and
re-designing of stormwater basins outside of the riparian buffer zone; 3) elimination of the proposed grading that was to occur
over the upper 659 If of the channel and redesigning of the grading plan to tie in to existing grades within the 50-foot riparian
buffer area; 4) application of natural channel design to areas where the channel had previously been graded for stormwater
features.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Required sediment and erosion control measures will be used during construction. Approved sediment and erosion control
measures (Permit GASTO-2010-008) will be updated by Woolpert, Inc. to reflect changes due to restoration modifications.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWO ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this

project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? UNK %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
A stormwater manangement plan has been approved for this project by Gaston Coun ty on 1/22/2010. Woolpert is in the
process of updating this plan to reflect the re-design that has occurred in order to min imize impacts and restore the
channel
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Gaston County
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ® Yes ? No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ® Yes ? No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): See attached
NOV. The site was designed during different hydrological conditions when the channel in question did not exhibit
characteristics of a jurisdictional channel as determined by JD reports provided by S&ME, Inc. and STV / Ralph Whitehead.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The prop.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal sewer lines are being extended to provide a means of sewage treatment for the facility to be built on the
property. This sewer line extension has been approved by NC DENR under permit number W000034551.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a . Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes No
habitat?
5b . Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
?
Raleigh
5c . If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d . What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Virtual Workroom indicated that no federally protected species
were present within a two mile radius of the project site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a . Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b . What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hftp://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh-coral/ims/viewer.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The proposed project will be constructed outside of the
100-year FEMA floodplain. Floodplain determination was done using GIS data available from the www.ncfloodmaps.com
web site on July 9, 2010.

D. David Homans 7/15/2010
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided I
Page 1 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
ItS&ME
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date: j } C.?
vroject intormation
S&ME Project Name- South Ridge Parkway Extension
Type of Project: NOV Response / After-the-fact 401-404 Permitting
Location: Gaston County, North Carolina
Property Owner/Representative Information
Business Name: Gaston County Economic Development Commission
Mailing Address: PO Box 2339
City, State, Zip Code: Gastonia, NC, 28053
Telephone No. 704-825-4046
Contact: Mr. Gary D. Hicks, Jr.
Agent Information
Business Name- S&ME, Inc.
Street Address: 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
City, State, Zip Code: Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone No. [phone]
Contact: David Homans
Authorization:
on behalf of
(Contact Signature)
1
- ("A v hereby authorize
(Name of Landowner)
S&ME, Inc. to act as agent for the above-mentioned project.
Bessemer City Rd
Bessenner° ? i
o_ v
QJ
C _
M1
main
all,
CS? j .
J ?
6 `
V? ?t
? ? ?f8l,klln
4 ,
r
Gastonia
/.
291

* Aproximate Project Location
l
REFERENCE:
THE ABOVE GIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE ESRI STREETMAP DATASET (200). PLEASE NOTE -
THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER 0 0.5
USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S&ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR
ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION.
'ALE: AS SHOWN
1
j o
I
ro <y
?J
t
aTE: 7.8.2010 SITE VICINITY MAP Southridge Parkway Extension
RAwN BY: DDH S&ME = Bessemer City, North Carolina
IECKED BY: JOL
1 PROJECT NO:
1357-10-028
FIGURE
NO.
1
87
o`TONCINAVE • (f l / l
APp
LE tN
: f
• G r i Ib t 4 k '..>qr G.
J ?
4 t l
:
t a t r
PIP • I _ ? Hotl nd '
D Al S), -
A E _ - -
Irn
g
in z
` WAVE •¦¦¦ <I' ?}r s ,I C?' •?
Al?
NERVE • s ¦ • .,1 A 2•?
LU •
m. 1 ¦ III P,. , IV
,
... • ?? .?"r 4
' 60M BESSEMER'CITY-RD+? {' t! `
LEEAVE r ?? r F I! --. _`'*- a
•
Ir S y
07
-CQ
E VIRG/N1PPJ?'
.
1r 6
. L _
6 . AST - f 3
GEO R ,
Glgq O
VE
-?'[ }132 a. ?' ,?••
?- JET
r.
DO O?
/.
'GQi t ?g?a ? 1 4? ?•^f' ?,..-?/' i * I
10
E_N'T,p`'I??RNYN ST--• ?' J ! . "•
II?? l
01
l1 p `4 e
?I- ,• - -?,j rte' ? I + ? -- _ Y. ?
I' - '? ••IQ? ?O r'>, X31
.. ¦ O OJ jf
611
-- :}
Approximate Project Area r' 000.
?" .
REFERENCE: USGS 1973 BESSEMER CITY INC] QUAD SHEET O
THE ABOVE GIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE USDA GEOSPATIAL DATA GATEWAY. PLEASE NOTE w ' ya - r,
THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER ,i 0;% `500 1,000 1;1500
USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S&ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR
ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. i ;,Feet t I
;ALE: AS SHOWN FIGURE
\TE: 7.8.2010 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP No.
tgwN BY: S&ME Southridge Parkway Extension
DDH ` - Bessemer City, North Carolina 2
IECKED BY: JOL PROJECT NO: 13557-10-028
View of the intermittent jurisdictional channel looking
View looking across the wetland area along channel
5 View of the 48" culvert outlet into the partially graded
stormwater wet pond area. Note the location where
the wet ponds tie back in to the channel.
M1, View of intermittent jurisdictional channel looking
downstream.
Taken by: DDH
Checked by: JoL - tIMEW&ME
Date Taken: 6.14.2010
View of the stand pipe and skimmer within the settling
basin area north of the road.
View of the undisturbed channel immediately
downstream of the stormwater basin tie-in.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
South Ridge Parkway Extension
Bessemer City, North Carolina
Project No.: 1357-10-028 1 Photo Page 1 of 1