090126_Inspection_20200805

Division of Water Resources `yv 5 ( �G- to mu
Facility Number FT-7 - J z 0 Division of Soil and Water Consetrvation b tlb
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: O Co fiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:IS at)(T Zt -VArrival Time:ly;NSA Departure Time:( /0 D Al County: 17 iciq/L1 Region:
Farm Name: k -1+P95(or wl 7i Owner Email:
Owner Name: R. Ft 0-r gc.,� sw,„ t-. v , Phone:
Mailing Address: (4,3e441_ i t/,-u:71 (6)
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: cu,Ji'c 8R�( , C Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: l t Integrator: t V\e' 5 Q �
Certified Operator: gAM1 ,mac y Certification Number: J� ? . Y Z
D �J j
Back-up Operator: !�O C/` l K 0 Certification Number: a6.6 k I
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 57 YS l'/(9 g Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poult Ca•aci Po•. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MEEN _- Beef Stocker
Gilts II Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1�❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No J-N NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑'NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No lag-A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes n-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: - / 2. (D Date of Inspection:.5 44,C-2ezv
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes able--❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No f _ t1 ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3 1
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 1-3 1Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [ Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes I lo- ❑ NA El NE
maintenance or improvement? �/
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑.NS ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): e 6 - s U 0 a1
13. Soil Type(s): N /
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ion ❑ NA El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El Yes [1].No ❑ NA I:: NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable El Yes at‘ ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [ .246 ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes p'N- ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes In< ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 13 N ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1121< ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes Iy ❑ NA ElNE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? :3ICJ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: 0/ - /Zfv Date of Inspection: S 4116 2-020
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes E'<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA El NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 1114 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes DNS- ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IThCri; ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes la< ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 1111<rlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).e (, j
Coy( (J 1 1 l9•A j—ei-2-0 I t (ri trr-ftY f fi ° — Ll
U z l " �,I ``J6
V
Gt'oc2 c p e
CA a(o -3oe - 6 ICI
Reviewer/Inspector Name: \%1 L 1 U u v.i p Phone: ��0— t13 3 33 3 y
np� 1 P
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: WL Date: 5/4 �O st-02r7
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015