The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0020338_Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report_20201123ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN secretary S. DANIEL SMITH Director Mr. Grant Trivette Town of Yadkinville P.O. Drawer 816 Yadkinville, NC 27055 NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality November 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Town of Yadkinville NPDES# NCO020338 Yadkin County Dear Mr. Trivette: On November 5, 2020 a Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) was performed by Jim Gonsiewski. Mr. Grant Trivette and Mr. Kason Snow were present for the inspection. The purpose of this inspection was to determine the effectiveness of the Town's pretreatment program, which includes reviewing the files, POTW plant performance, industry monitoring data, and adherence to the enforcement response plan (ERP). Background This is a 2.5 MGD permitted facility. The City has four (4) Significant Industrial Users and one (1) Categorical Industrial User regulated per CFR 433. POTW Interview There are no plant problems related to pretreatment issues and there are no NPDES permit limit or monitoring violations recorded from March 2019 through October 2020. The facility is very well operated. Pretreatment Program Elements Review The Headworks Analysis (HWA) renewal was submitted on August 18, 2017. The HWA was approved on October 31, 2017, The next HWA is due on September 1, 2022. The Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) was submitted on January 11, 2017. The IWS was approved on April 7, 2017. The next IWS is due on January 31, 2022. The Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) was approved on January 2, 2012. The Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) was approved on November 19, 2010. D_EQJ North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regional Office 1 450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 3001 Winston-Salem, North Carollna 27105 ..,.+owe\ /"� 336.776.9800 LTMP File Review The Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP) was approved on September 14, 2020 and is being conducted at the proper locations and frequencies. Industrial User Permit ([UP) File Review A review of the file for Unifi #5 (#0005) revealed that the monitoring data was well organized and compliant. A review of the file for the Austin Company (#0006) revealed that the monitoring data was well organized and compliant. A review of the file for B&G Foods (#0004) revealed that the monitoring data was well organized and compliant. The slug control plan for Unifi #5 (#0005) was in good order. The slug control plan for the Austin Company (#0006) was in good order. The slug control plan for B&G Foods (40004) was in good order. Action Items During the reporting period, one exceedance of cyanide was noted at the Austin Company. This exceedance caused the facility to be in Significant Non -Compliance. No other action items were noted. The pretreatment program is considered satisfactory. Mr. Trivette conducts an excellent pretreatment program. If you have any questions please contact Jim Gonsiewski or me at (336) 776-9800. Sincerely, E Eftugl d by g9: O/.T Sg4M�V LOT t "Effe Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ — WSRO Enclosure: PCI Report cc: PERCS Unit — Mike Montebello (Electronic Copy) WSRO Electronic Files Laserfiche Files NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES NCO S PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT WaterReso " ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITV BACKGROUND INFORMATION IComDlete Prior To PCI: Review Program Info Database Sheets 1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Yadkinville 2. Control Authority Representative(s): Grant Trivette Jason Snow 3. Title(s): Pretreatment Coordinator/WWTPORC 4. Last Inspection Date: 03/20/19 Inspection Type (Check One): ❑ PCI ® Audit 5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO 6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO Order Type, Number, Parameters: ICIS CODING Main Program Permit Number I N I C 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 3 1 3 18 1 MM/DD/YY 1 11 1 05 1 20 1 Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO 7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)9 8. Number of SIUs With No IUP or With an Expired IUP? 0 9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? 00 10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? 00 11. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? 12. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? OD 13. Number of SIUs in SNC with Pretreatment Schedule? 0 14. Number of SIUs on Schedules? 15. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users CIUs ? 1� 16. Number of CIUs in SNC? l 17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations? If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed? 18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased Sludge Production, Etc.)? If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed? 19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC for Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Put 20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division? 21. Are Any Permits or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which Ones? LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW: ❑ YES ®NO [-]YES ®NO Limits: Cyanide (.094 mg/1) (Austin) Reporting: None dished: Fon ❑ YES ® NO 22, Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO 23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO 24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO 25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO Division Inspector, please verify. 26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations 27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added: NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 1 28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in their files, complete with sunoortina documents and cony of PERCS Annrnval Letter and dates nnnsistent with Prnar.m tnfn- Program Element Last Submittal Date In file? Last Approval Date In file Date Next Due, If Applicable Headworks Analysis (HWA) 08/18/2017 Yes No 10/31/2017 1 ®YesZYeso No 09/01/2022 Industrial Waste Survey IWS 01/11/2017 ® Yes Lj No 04/07/2017 1 M Yes ❑ No 01/31/2022 Sewer Use Ordinance SUO 12/02/2011 ® Yes ❑ No 01/02/2012 ®Yes ❑ No Enforcement Response Plan ERP 09/13/2019 Yes ❑ No 11/19/2019 ® Yes ❑ No Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP) 06/15/2020 ® Yes ❑ No 09/19/2020 ® Yes ❑ No INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 111INSPFCT1ON) 29. User Name - --- -- 1.Unifi #5 2. Austin -- -- --- - -- ---------- 3.B&G Food Snacks 30. IUP Number 0005 0006 00 44 31. Does File Contain Current Permit? ®Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ®Yes ❑ No 32. Permit Expiration Date 03/3]/2024 03/31/2024 OS/31/2025 33. Categorical Standard Applied I.E. 40 CFR, Etc. Or N/A 0 433 0 34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior E Yes ❑ No ®Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No to Permit Issue Date? 35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year? I®Yes ❑ No ®Yes ❑ No ®Yes ❑ No 36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan? a. ®Yes ❑No a. ®Yes ❑No a. ®Yes ❑No b. If No, is One Needed? See Inspection Form from POT b. ❑Yes [-]No b. ❑Yes Elmob. ❑Yes ❑No 37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic pYesONo®N/A ®Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No®N/A Organic Management Plan TOMP ? 38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division? a. ®Yes ❑No a. EYes ❑No a. ®Yes ❑No b. All Issues Resolved? I b.OYesONo®N/A b.OYe oNoON/A IL b.OYesONa0N/A 39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete ® Yes ❑ No ®Yes ❑ No ®Yes ❑ No its Sampling as Required by IUP including flow? 40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms? ®Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ®Yes ❑ No 41. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its ®YespNo❑N/A ®YespNopN/A ®YespNo❑N/A Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow? 41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports ®YespNopN/A ❑Yes®NopN/A ®YespNopN/A on time? 42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does ❑YespNo®N/A ❑YespNo®N/A ❑YespNo®N/A file includeprocess/dilution flows as Required by IUP? 42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include ❑YespNo®N/A ❑YespNo®N/A pYes❑No®N/A production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP? 43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify ® Yes ❑ No ®Yes ❑ No ®Yes ❑ No All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling? 43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify DYesElNoNN/A ®YespNopN/A ❑YespNo®N/A All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling? 44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self- a.®YesONoON/A a.OYesONoON/A a.®YesONoON/A Monitoring Violations? b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days? b.OYesONo®N/A b.®YesONoON/A b.®YesONoON/A c. If applicable, Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU? c.®YesONoON/A c.®YesONOON/A c.pYesONo®N/A 46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC? 1 ❑ Yes E No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ®No 47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken ®YespNopN/A ®YespNopN/A ®YespNopN/A as Specified in the POTW's ERP OVs, Penalties timing, tc.? 48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices? DYes®NopN/A ®YespNopN/A ❑Yes®NopN/A 49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection? ❑Yes®NopN/A ❑Yes®NopN/A ®YespNopN/A 50. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders? a.OYesONo®N/A a.ovesONo®N/A a.OYesONo®N/A b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order? b.OYesONo®N/A b.OYesONoON/A b.OYesONo®N/A 51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This ❑Yes ®No ❑Yes ®No ®Yes ❑ No Requested Information For You? NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 2 FILE REVIEW COMMENTS: The files were complete and well organized. INDUSTRY INSPECTION ICIS CODING: Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY I I I 1. Industry Inspected: 2. Industry Address: 3. Type of Industry/Product: 4. Industry Contact: Title: 5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ❑ YES ❑ NO 6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly? Comments: A. Initial Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO B. Plant Tour ❑ YES [--]NO C. Pretreatment Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO D. Sampling Review ❑ YES ❑ NO E. Exit Interview [-]YES ❑ NO Industrial Inspection Comments: OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS: Comments: Requirements: Recommendations: NOD: ❑ YES ® NO NOV: ❑ YES ®NO QNCR: ❑ YES ®NO POTW Rating: Satisfactory X Marginal Unsatisfactory PCI COMPLETED BY: Jim Gonsiewski DATE: 11/23/2020 NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 3