20010155 Ver 1_Monitoring Report_20080711

HABITAT
ASSESSMENT AND
RESTORATION
PROGRAM, INC. -.--
9305-D Monroe Road
Charlotte, NC 28270
Office: 704-841-2841
Fax: [phone]
email: [e-mail]
www.habitatassessment.com
Employee Owned
ol- 0155
Ms. Amanda Mueller
NCDWQ-Wetlands Div
MSC 1650
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Re: 2008 Stream Restoration Monitoring Report
Northwest Water Treatment Facility
Winston Salem/Forsyth County, NC
Stream Mitigation Report
Dear Ms. Mueller;
July 8, 2008
Enclosed is the 2008 monitoring report for the Northwest Water Treatment plant in Winston-Salem, NC.
A copy of this report has been submitted to John Thomas at the USACE. Please don't hesitate to contact
me if you have questions.
Respectfully submitted,
Karri Cecil Blackmon
9JULY 1 2008
UENR - WATER UUAUTY
4 nA40S AND STORMWATER BRANCH
HABITAT ANALYSIS • ENDANGERED PLANT STUDIES • STREAM RESTORATION • WETLAND MITIGATION • MONITORING
2008 Stream Restoration Monitoring Report
Northwest Water Treatment Facility
Winston Salem/Forsyth County, N.C.
Stream Mitigation Project
June, 2008
Prepared by:
HARP, Inc.
9305-D Monroe Road
Charlotte, NC 28270
Contact:
U (? LS? r= Ms. Karri Blackmon
L? lI `:.A L? Karri(eDhabitatassessment.com
704-841-2841
JU1. ?Gll8
DENT
WETLANDS AND si oRmWAI ER BRANCH
2008 Stream Restoration Monitoring Report
Northwest Water Treatment Facility
Winston Salem/Forsythe County, N.C.
Stream Mitigation Project
Executive Summary
This report presents stream monitoring data for stream restoration and mitigation for permitted
impacts related to the construction of the Winston Salem/Forsyth County Northwest Water Treatment
Facility. The approved stream mitigation plan (August, 2000) called for approximately 2000 linear
feet of stream restoration at two sites, and the stabilization of an unstable old pond outfall area below
the plant NPDES discharge area. In April of 2006, all restoration construction activities were
completed. This document reports the 0 annual cycle of monitoring data and results for one of the
sites, and year 2 data for the other two sites completed during this annual cycle. Future monitoring
schedules are summarized for each of the sites. The three sites are referred to as the a) "Taylor Road
Reach", b) "Old Pond Site Reach", and c) "Beroth Road Reach".
Taylor Road Reach. This reach, with approximately 1640 linear feet of restored "E-type" channel, is
located on a small unnamed tributary discharging directly to the Yadkin River within the Yadkin
River floodplain on its west side across from the Plant intake facility. It can be accessed from Taylor
Road. This "Taylor Road Reach" (UT to Yadkin River) restoration entered its 4d' year of monitoring
during this annual cycle. Newly surveyed morphologic and plant community data for this annual
cycle are presented here and compared to as-built data to demonstrate continued success of this part
of the restoration effort. Monitoring of this site shall continue for an additional year. Should signs of
instability be noted in future monitoring results, a remediation plan will be prepared and completed
within 12 months.
Old Pond Site Reach. This reach, with approximately 240 linear feet of stabilized "B and E-type
Rosgen" channel, is located along a I' order unnamed tributary to Huffinan Creek draining headwater
catchments on the west side of the main treatment facility that border Beroth Road on the east side of
the Yadkin River in Forsyth County. An old farm pond (now wetland) situated upstream from the
"Beroth Road Reach" restoration was in the process of failing due to a deep headcut progressively
eroding into the toe of the old pond embankment. During the winter of 2005 and spring of 2006, a
new stabilized outfall reach 240 feet in length was constructed around the headcut that preserved the
upstream wetlands in the old pond bottom. The 2006 monitoring report included as-built information
for this stabilization effort including: planform, profile, cross section morphologic survey data, and
photos from a number of established vantagepoints. This report includes year 2 of a visual inspection
monitoring protocol. Should signs of instability be noted, the planform, cross section, and
longitudinal as-built surveys will be re-surveyed and a remediation plan will be prepared and
completed within 12 months.
Beroth Road Reach. This reach, with approximately 460 linear feet of "E-type" channel restoration,
is located along a 2°d order unnamed tributary to Huffman Creek just to the east of where Huffman
Creek crosses under Beroth Road. The site is adjacent to the west access road to the water treatment
plant. An 1.2 acre (approximately 50 feet to both sides) riparian conservation buffer was also
established as part of the restoration. Construction of the restoration commenced in January of 2006
and was completed in April of 2006. The 2006 report included as-built planform, cross section and
p. 2
profile morphologic data, photographs from established photostations, and planting data. Monitoring
of this restoration reach is to be conducted annually for a period of 5 years, and each monitoring cycle
re-surveys cross sections and the longitudinal profile, re-photographs each photostation, and re-
inventories the plant community within the established 1.2 acre conservation buffer. Monitoring data
for each annual cycle is compared to the as-built information to document the continued success of
the restoration. Should signs of instability be noted a remediation plan will be prepared and
completed within 12 months. This report presents monitoring data for the 2"d of the 5 required years
of monitoring.
p. 3
Table of Contents
Section 1. "Taylor Road Reach" Restoration, Yr. 4 Monitoring Results
1. l Discussion of Morphologic Monitoring and Photostation data
1.2 Discussion and Analysis of Plant Survivorship data
133 Morphologic Monitoring Exhibits
Figure WS-YD-1. As-built Planform Map with Monitoring Stations
Figure WS-YD-2. Yr. 4 Monitoring Survey plots of Cross Sections
Figure WS-YD-3. Yr. 4 Monitoring Survey plot of Longitudinal Profile
1.4 Monitoring Photostation Photographs
Section 2. "Old Pond Outfall Reach" Stabilization, Year 2 Monitoring Results
2.1 Discussion of Stabilization and Monitoring Program
2.2 Figure WS-OP-1. As-built Planform Map with Photostation Locations
2.3 Year 2 Photographs from Photostarions.
Section 3. "Beroth Road Reach" Restoration, Year 2 Monitoring Results
3.1. Discussion of Morphologic Monitoring and Photostarion data
3.2 Morphologic Monitoring Exhibits
Figure WS-BR-1. As-built Planform (with monitoring stations)
Figure WS-BR-2. Yr. 2 Monitoring Survey plots of Cross Sections
Figure WS-BR-3. Yr. 2 Monitoring Survey plot of Longitudinal Profile
33 Monitoring Photographs from Photostarions.
Appendix. Survey Data Tables
Page
p. 5
p. 5
p. 6
p. 8
P. 9
P. 10
P. 10
P. 11
p. 12
p. 13
p. 13
p. 16
p. 17
p. 18
p. 4
Section 1. "Taylor Road Reach" Restoration, Yr. 2 Monitoring Results
1.1. Discussion of Morphologic Monitoring and Photostation data
The as-built planform sheet of Figure WS-YD-1 shows the locations of monitoring cross
sections and photostations. There are 8 monitoring cross sections; 4 of which are located in meander
areas, and 4 of which are located in inflection areas. There are 4 established photostations with 6
formal vantagepoints to be taken in each annual monitoring event. The azimuth of each photograph is
shown on the as-built planform map of WS-YD-1. The reach had stream construction for a total
length of 1977 linear feet but an uppermost 266 ft long transition area and an additional 71 linear feet
occupied by a culvert located from station 1119 to 1190 feet were not counted as part of the
mitigation and restoration length.
The upper 266 feet was widened and deepened during the first year of monitoring to aleviate
backwater problems above the restoration. A discussion of the changes made in this upper transition
area was included in the year 1 monitoring results. The photograph taken from photostation 41 and
the longitudinal profile shown in Figure WS-YD-3 show that neither the dimension or profile meets
with the original design parameters for the restoration in this 266 ft long transition. This leaves 1640
linear feet of restoration to be monitored during subsequent monitoring cycles. This report focus on
the remaining 1640 linear feet that have reference reach-based morphologic attributes.
Cross section survey results for the May 2007 to May of 2008 annual cycle are plotted in
Figure WS-YD-2. No significant departures are noted in the comparison of the monitoring data with
the as-built data. The asbuilt survey did not include the area taken in by the coir fiber logs at the toe
of slope. The monitoring cross sections reflect this areas, as they have become intergral portions of
the lower bank soil and vegetation structure.
Photographs shown in the attached year 4 monitoring photojournal (Section 1.4) illustrate
that all banks and over-bank flood plain areas are vegetated and stable.
The Longitudinal Profile monitoring results are shown in Figure WS-YD-3 where the data is
plotted on top of the results from prior monitoring events as well as the as built survey data. The
overall reach showns no net change in grade, with exception of the upper 266 feet that was disturbed.
All riffle areas are stable, with neither aggradation or deflation in their elevations from the as-built
survey. The meander pools have continued to be dynamically maintained by storm flow and show
some fluctuation in deep pool location and depth, which is to be expected as inner bars shift their
geometries from storm to storm.
Overall, the plots of cross section and longitudinal profile data and the photographs from the
photo stations indicate that the 1640 linear feet of restoration at this site has maintained a stable
planform, dimension and profile.
p. 5
1.2. Discussion and Analysis of Plant Survivorship data
NW Forsyth Water Treatment Plant Mitigation
Monitoring for Riparian Planting Zones - Yadkin Co.
24 April 2007 28 May 2008
Planted Volunteer Planted Volunteer
Cross-Section Plot # 1- West, (513.75 .ft.)
2 Green ash 2 Box elder maple 1 Green ash 2 Box elder maple
1 Red oak 1 Calle ear 1 Red oak
Cross-Section Plot # 2 - East, (435.35 sq.ft.)
2 Red oak 2 Box elder maple 4 Red oak 1 Box elder maple
2 Black walnut
Cross-Section Plot # 3 - East, (944.59 .ft.)
3 Red oak 3 Box elder maple 3 Red oak 2 Box elder maple
2 Yellow poplar 1 Sweet-gum 3 Yellow pop
Cross-Section Plot # 4 - West, (637.43 .ft.)
2 Swam chestnut oak 2 Black willow 2 Swam chestnut oak 2 Black willow
1 Green ash 1 Box elder maple 1 Green ash 2 Box elder maple
Cross-Section Plot # 5 - West, (907.07 .ft.)
2 River birch 29 Black willow 3 River birch 14 Black willow
2 Box elder maple 3 Box elder maple

Cross-Section Plot # 6- East, (1248.48 .ft.)
1 Red oak 1 Callery pear 1 Red oak 1 Tag alder
1 River birch 19 Black willow 1 River birch 20 Black willow
8 Box elder maple 1 Black walnut 1 l Box elder maple
1 Sweet-gum
3 Sycamore 11 Sycamore
Cross-Section Plot # 7- East, (1219.72 .ft.)
1 Red oak 52 Black willow 1 Red oak 51 Black willow
1 Black walnut 7 Box elder maple 1 Yellow poplar 25 Box elder maple
5 Caller ear 1 River birch 2 Callery pear
3 Sycamore 1 Black walnut 10 Sycamore
1 Silky willow 1 Persimmon
Cross-Section Plot # 8- West, (903.61 s .ft.)
1 Yellow poplar 57 Black willow 1 Yellow poplar 53 Black willow
2 Swamp chestnut oak 7 Box elder maple 2 Swam chestnut oak 6 Box elder maple
5 Multiflora rose 1 Green ash 11Multiflora rose
p. 6
This monitoring event shows thirty-one planted trees and two hundred and twenty-nine volunteer
trees present in the 8 plots for a total of two hundred and sixty trees. Some plots lost trees but others
gained in numbers over that observed in the prior year's assessment. This may be due to the counting
of trees that had previously been hidden in the dense herbaceous cover (nowgrowing large enough to
be found) or to resprouting of trees that had died back. Overall this year's count is an increase of 10
percent over the previous monitoring event. The combined acreage of the 8 plots totals to 0.156
acres, which gives a tree density of one thousand six hundred and sixty-six trees per acre. Again, as
in previous years, the large number of volunteers accounts for the growth in the tree count.
Live stake survivorship is still very high, about 95%, with some now over 1.1 feet in height. Some
stakes struggle to grow but now have less competition from bank grasses planted to help stabilize the
slopes. The coir fiber logs are fully vegetated and stable with vegetation in the channel in many
places. Volunteer Alders along the stream are providing excellent shade and in places form a closed
canopy over the stream.
Species List
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Common Name Scientific Species Name
Black walnut Ju lans ni ra
Black willow Salix ni ra
Box elder maple Acer negundo
Callery pear rus calleryana
Green ash Fravinus enns lvanica
Multiflora rose Rosa multiflora
Persimmon Diosypros vir iniana
Red oak O_uercus rubra
River birch Betula ni ra
Silk willow Salix sericea
Swamp chestnut oak Quercus michauxii
Sweet-gum Liquidambar stvraciflua
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
Tag alder Alnus serrulata
Yellow poplar Liriodendron tulipifera
p. 7
1.3 Morphologic Monitoring Exhibits
Figure WS-YD-1. As-built Planform Map with Monitoring Stations
Figure WS-YD-2. Yr. 4 Monitoring Survey plots of Cross Sections
Figure WS-YD-3. Yr. 4 Monitoring Survey plot of Longitudinal Profile
p. 8
su011eTS oioud pue su01109S ssoaO ON `AINnOD HIASUOJ
tr00Z AGenuejr LZ 15uuolluolN 10 suolle00-1 ql!m NOlIV91lIW )1332!0
Ljoead paaolIsad aol uaaojueId - l-(]/k-SM ajnOij II JIM ls@M U:W®N-6V !0t, :ON 80f
Z I:)V INO3-'J'1'M MN
9 olc4d
1 3aS 150d UPII
b # 00401S 010%
1" 4 S # 0104d ?
a/eas
u (oZ ---oo L _? ?o
lac IsOd 1-10.11
004-0
Z # :)Z
s-
17 3aS lsOd Uo,11
laS !sod uolt 14
LL
00+0 laS !sod Uoil
L :mS-X
IaS !sod uolI a
00+0
2 E? 03S-X
,bla- !sod U0-Al
las !sod U011 0' t 3aS !sod U0A
00+0 b # 03 X
ftil, V # 01o4d
£ # U04FIS 03004d
Z# U04eIS 0104d P'
£ # 0104d
jopq uoljenaasuoo :4 pc
3aS !sod UOJI
S # 03S X ?? WS !sod u0JI
laS !sod u0JI - Z, LZt
0(03 fotiuur)#9U.ROH lgdo12a0ru 7ertt0 Oi0do1910UP3;d
sl?
1.k, l
m X000 92009 b9SJM M 000LZo09
to
m
0
m
0
0
0
m
0
•J
O
M ,000'9',,00 HMM
M ,000'Leooe
00+0
V?
9 # 03S-X
lag !sod uol? ?,
00+0 ' *s
laS !sod 1-1011 L # 03S-X
00+0
? OLS!
laS !sod Uo1?
00+0 l
R # 73S-X
10S !sod uo1I
laS !sod uoA
Z A 03o4d"'
? Nj !sod uoq
laS Isod Uol11
L # U04eIS 0104d L # 0104d
ma v v £ `Z `6 aeaA `lllnq-sd !suol?aas ssoaa MAIN uilpeA of Aleingia j poweuun - uoi?eaolsaN
LLti3
: HN?:
hQ1
8Un
8002
43em uolmoisaa •Z-aA-sM ainOi j
WMIS;Dafoad u014e6IM d1M WGIBS-uoIsuiM }?
.
.

6uwao4luow g aeaA - -- 6uljo4iuow 6 aeaA
6uiaoliuow ti aeaA "-+- 6UIJ0;lu0W Z aeaA mne-sy -
:1!?ff-) ?GIJ :'. <;i0., ?. Fa ;j (w H:3 !;l?S A)11 C!1? i U7J 11 L1 ':!1 i, { - )??,',..
03L Otl ON 06 09 OL 09 09 Ob OE OF 0L 0
SLL

..
,u _.- 0&
T
;saM aapueew 8# Uolloes SSOa3 ;sea SZL
J-.t.., i_i? ? Aj u-L'3i•1 ac3 N !? r?1.,1{^>. <<; _, 2 %t. 1.:^.u :. _ ,. --,
OZt Olt 001 06 09 OL 09 OS Oti OE OF OL 0
SLL
-
--- - __, - - - =- -OZL
3sam ;sea 9ZL
u013381jul L# u0113as SSO.13

OZt OLt OOL 06 09 OL 09 OS Ob OE OF 0L 0
SLL

OZL
yinos
4uoN SzL
u011391jul 9# u01joes SSOa3
001 OLL OW 06 09 OL 09 OS Ob 0£ OZ 0L 0
SLL
OZL
;sanny;noS ;sENPON SZL
.iopueen 9# uoljaas SSO.13
Oet OLL Obl 06 09 OL 09 OS 04 O£ OF Ot 0
SLL
- - _ OZL
;SemglnoS
;sea41JoN SZL
Japueew ti# uoljoas SSOa3
OZt OtL ON 06 09 OL 09 09 Ob OE OF 01 0
SLL
- - OZL
;saM u011391jul £# U01joes SSOJ3 ;sea SZL
pgoif•ua 1001F1.19 WO4 sea N 7" P 40s sIlMdPtira FuPoyi ov 6 3 y Je`"A.
OZL Ott 001 06 09 OL 09 OS 04 OE OF O1 0

9LL
O&Z
1saM ise3
u01338Ijul Z# u0113as SSOJ3
•;fu ,ar,_:e??, situ pzi?.?lxc„da)e i'?"day,,. vavy #se3 ;? , c?y?ys .sju?a;?::e 6uuo;iua;,^p . ,e? ?.
OZL OLt OOL 06 09 OL 09 09 04 OE OF Ot 0

;saM
aapueew L# u0113as SSOJ3 ;Se3
o 00
N O
= CV
O
!O N
m C
7
-- - - - m d N > tb > N > tV m
J> J> J> J> C
Q J I- J L J L J O
a e0 d W 'a ? 'a . 'C C to C
" > ?m?ym3m3: m ;0 U
o O m °? vs as rn of of of cm ;°. Z
0 J> C C C C C C C C CL
-0 0) M 'c
W d fl .a0.+ . ?O. ? ? :m r a0?. H ? O
e0 U
1.
06 c w
?m 0 0 L?
w - - i' N is O 'a
O r r N N M I'M IV 1* d V .r
_.- ?' 10 l0 ILO IO l0 O!L > t
0? IA tll d d CI N m d d w 3 r O>
1?? ???
N O c
c
- - - - -? - - - V -- J ? v
o c o
?v
J
W °o In c
--- --- --- -- -- - --
C
O ' s
u
c
O w U- a°,
"? c o 09
.y0.+ o ? c U
ai 06 o z
. u
o a?
I
m ? Esd
c
?. v
°oo dE IM
o m w o E
a
LO i ?? N,? 3y ?
a „? doGr
CL X
M Z 3
--
?' 3 X X 1 10
L
O - - - - 00
Of
.J
L N ...................b.....................i...............b..... ...-:e................ ... 0I
i
z
c -- ?:o W
o . L. n
C ..............'.......1............ ' ..................q.... ............. =i
LO II;
W C 11 W ? N N 4n c.
L-
C C •- E a f 0III ^.
P N
C
W C ................. .......................1?t
W.?.c ............ O O
0 0 C14 (0
N
I
C
C ? c
. ............. ..........................?......
?m ti.....;. o
X ?
....................................i.......,.............................:.a...................
o
-- N fl. p j K p i
= e N
!-
to CL
m N N
O 06 Q
06 iC n ry n n
C
m (IGGI) U01lena13
Lj?
b ®-- o
N N In W n co N It co
n n n rZ r7 n n n
(u) uopenal3
1.4 Monitoring Photostation Photographs
p. 9

Photo 1. Upper tie-in looking upstream
Photo 2. Upper tie-in looking downstream
F
gy?f
_14?i^^??v?s. `...&zt€?-+v _'_?-.?.szxr_:?cr ,'. r'!_ •:: ..??;e:-,,
Photo 3. Road crossing looking upstream
. Vd

b

k;
" IT*
' "` ? ?• ? ` "' x 't 't. ins.
t
7gj' . °k '.fit a. ,k
r
Photo 4. Road crossing looking downstream
r'.
14,
?; mI
`r
* N, .s
.
A,:
_ c
I
y,
i
Photo 5. Lower tie-in looking upstream
Section 2. "Old Pond Outffall Reach" Stabilization, As-built Data
2.1 Discussion of Stabilization As-built Data and Monitoring Program
The stream impact mitigation plan submitted in August of 2000 proposed stream restoration
along approximately 400 to 600 linear feet of an unnamed 2"d order tributary to Huffiman Creek that
drained two first order catchments along the west side of the main water treatment plant adjoining
Beroth Road (see Figure WS-BR-1). One of the two contributing catchments contained an old pond
(see Figure WS-OP-1) that had mostly filled in with sediment and had an outfall with a deeply incised
headcut that partially breached the dam embankment. The stream impact mitigation plan called for
stabilization of the outfall to this pond prior to restoration of the downstream reach just above Beroth
Road. In the spring of 2005, the pond was found to be drained due to the lowering of the outfall
breach with a significant portion of the old bottom of the pond transitioning to a emergent wetland
community. Continued development of the headcut would have released most of the historically
accumulated silts within the old pond bottom to downstream waters, impacting the proposed
downstream restoration work. In order to prevent this, a new stabilized outfall reach 240 feet in
length was constructed around the headcut that preserved the upstream wetlands in the old pond
bottom. The stabilization plan for the reach used the same reference reach approach and reference
data set as set forth for the restoration work at the Taylor Road Reach or Beroth Road Reach.
Photo mosaic of headcut below old farm pond, vertical height is approximately 12 -14 ft., this has
now been filled and revegetated as part of the stabilization work.
This document includes a copy of the as-built planform sheet for this stabilization effort showing
the location of the established photostations. Shown on p. 12 are photographs acquired in June of
2008 for the 2"d of 5 visual monitoring events. Should signs of instability be noted in any of the
visual inspections, the planform, cross section, and longitudinal as-built surveys will be re-surveyed,
and a remediation plan will be prepared and completed within 12 months.
P. 10
2.2 Figure WS-OP-1. As-built Planform (with monitoring stations)
P. 11
ctrl
?vU
cTc
o
a) N
cU W- CC to C
o a
N to - p
s
tf
rn
rn
0
J
O
C
CO
C
CG
..O
M N
C CO 0 O
O C7/
'
O 61
w
a

C) m
p LL
m jU C)
?PSi O cn m

Z O Q N O
O cn "O

(0
O YO
O
O O .C C

0 0 C -O

N (u O

O
c)C7
W
Y d ` ? .,, U It .
W

a d '

aQ C `? 4-- -- --- - co 90
s ?>
0) 0) i
V ? {
Q r+,
N n. e? .
0 0 t l
! i +
X G7
r?
+
I
0 '
O
C) i
cn /
Li 0 1
I
-(`loft
Q
y ca
00, filiv I ca
ro
r

qa (n ;'? °? ,t

I -C
{c
0
cu
0
Cl)
C
c
1) U
?co
CO ,
I a- rr _
C O
F-
AV

F- CY)
N CJ
0 j
? cA
IJ'
?o
o m 1
4.
I?
t
x d.-r
i
ca
cu
F O /
70
C: c
fi 41
\ ti. ? Cn i
as
LL
Ca
0
T-
LO
10
N
q
°0
3 0 0
CL
0
0 0
vU
® ® C
E j =
9 Z ® 9
®.s? 0)
eo-M C
•??,=o
C 0
P 0 0
® 0
2 -6
® O
•? s
® Z
0 Q)
E C
LL.
Im
E
a
h
.E r
Z ?:
s
i
a u1
I_.
? ? ur
1 4 a: 0s•
2.3 Year 2 Photographs from Photostations.
p. 12

-T k,
x
Photo Station 1. Photo 1, lower tie-in, looking downstream
e
dr r f`i 4cg?,
40
3
im
-A

!
?
r
k ..
y
T?°be..YA
T . ?-
Photo Station 1. Photo 2, lower tie-in, looking upstream
Photo Station 2
Photo Station 2. Photo 4, looking upstream
r:
r? 's:k.,.Yfr' 'fh
Photo Station 3. Photo

downstream
NW& T `? ? '
3
s_
i
S
. ?'i?? y. ,p•} AIR '?.•° ,? ? ba V
T e
40,
3 fir'
A .. ,,. ?;ey ..'mow,;iYj?'"°:t --. '.ta;,A «a,EP^-s:•..".;?
,t° ?s.1rf ?' y f ? sae ) g +:?? L ! ?f?y ,??••+
Photo Station 3. Photo 6, upper tie-in
Section 3. "Beroth Road Reach" Restoration, Year 2 Monitoring Data
3.1. Discussion of Restoration As-built Data and Monitoring Program
This reach, with approximately 500 linear feet of "E-type" channel restoration, is located
along a 2nd order unnamed tributary to Huffman Creek just to the east of where Huffman Creek
crosses under Beroth Road. Huffman Creek drains to Bashavia Creek, which in turn discharges
directly to the Yadkin River (USGS Unit: 03040101) only 2000 - 3000 feet to the west of Beroth
Road. The location of the site is shown in Figures WS-YD-1 and WS-BR-1. The site is adjacent to
the west access road to the water treatment plant. The reach prior to restoration was a channelized
reach with agricultural field to both sides. There were only limited scrub, shrub and small trees (<4"
DBH) along the edge of the ditch-like channel. The restoration followed the basic design outlined in
the 2000 Stream Mitigation Plan and used two local reference reach sites to formulate the
morphologic attributes that guided the restoration work. Construction of the restoration commenced
in January of 2006 and was completed in April of 2006.
In addition to the morphologic restoration of the stream, an approximately 1 acre (on average
50 feet to both sides) riparian conservation buffer was also established as part of the restoration. The
conservation buffer was planted with a diverse bottomland forest list of species of trees which along
with the existing trees that were saved along the old channel bring the density of trees to 484 trees per
acre. The planting schedule for the buffer is laid out in the table that follows. The banks of the
channel were dominantly planted with Silky Dogwood and Silky Willow live stakes 2' o.c.
(additional live stakes of Silky Willow were places behind coir fiber logs to lock these into toe of
banks on the outer meander bend areas). To increase the diversity of the plant community along the
stream banks, 6 to 12 individual stakes or plugs of the following species were scattered along the
reach: Arrow-wood (Viburnum dentatum), Coral-berry (Symphoricarpos orbiculatus), Elderberry
(Sambucus canadensis), Virginia willow (Itea virginica), Cottonwood (Populus deltoides), and
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis).
The 2006 report included as-built planform, cross section and profile morphologic data,
photographs from established photostations, and planting data. The 2007 report provided year 1
monitoring data. This report presents the 2nd year of monitoring data for this reach and includes re-
surveyed cross sections and the longitudinal profile, new photographs of each photostation, and a re-
inventory of the plant community within the established conservation buffer. The data data is
compared to as-built and year 1 monitoring information provided in the 2006 and 2007 reports to
document the continued success of the restoration. Should signs of instability be noted a remediation
plan will be prepared and completed within 12 months.
Cross section survey results for the May 2007 to May of 2008 annual cycle are plotted in
Figure WS-BR-2 (Section 3.3). No significant departures are noted in the comparison of the
monitoring data with the as-built data. The as-built survey included the area taken in by the coir fiber
logs at the toe of slope. The year 1 and 2 cross sections illustrate how the coir fiber logs trap
sediment and become integrated into the bank slope. Photographs included in Section 3.3 also
illustrate how well vegetation has rooted into the coir logs and tied them into the stream bed and bank
with their developing vegetative root structure.
The monitoring results for the longitudinal profile area shown in Figure WS-BR-3 where the
data is plotted on top of the as-built data. The overall reach showns no significant change in grade,
with neither aggradation or deflation when compared to the as-built survey. The meander pools have
each been hydraulically scoured down to reach an equilibrium depth of approximately 1 foot and
p. 13
continued to be dynamically maintained by storm flow. There are some fluctuation in pool location
and depth, which is to be expected as inner bars shift their geometries from storm to storm.
Photographs shown in Section 3.4 illustrate that all banks and over-bank flood plain areas are
vegetated and stable. Substantial new growth has occurred on both the bank and floodplain woody
vegetation despite concerns regarding the impacts of the 2007-08 drought.
Overall, the plots of cross section and longitudinal profile data and the photographs from the
photo stations indicate that the 470 linear feet of restoration at this site has maintained a stable
planform, dimension and profile.
p. 14
3.2. Discussion and Analysis of Plant Survivorship Data
Table of Beroth Road Buffer Planting
Common Name Scientific Name Planted Surviving
5129108 Volunteers
Northwest Side of Restoration
Arrowwood Vibumum dentatum 1
Black gum N ssa s lvatica 15 15 1
Black willow Salix ni ra 22
Box elder cer ne undo 8
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis 1
Chokeber Aronia arbutifolia 2
Cottonwood Po ulus deltoides 2
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 1
Persimmon Diso ros vi iniana 1 1
Prunus Prunus serotina 1
Red maple cer rubrum 1
River birch Betula ni ra 25 25 6
Rose Rosa s pp. 1
Silky dogwood Comus amomum 12
Swam chestnut oak Quercus michauxii 3 3
Sweet-gum Liquidambarstyraciflua 35
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 35 38
Tag alder Anus serrulata 90
Yellow poplar Liriodendron tuli ifera 45 48
Willow oak Quercus phellos 1 1
Southeast Side of Restoration
Arrowwood Vibumum dentatum 2
Black um N ssa s lvatica 27 19
Box elder cer negundo 21
Cottonwood Po ulus deltoides 2
Pear Pyrus spp. 1
Persimmon Diso ros vir iniana 1
River birch Betula ni ra 67 59
Swam chestnut oak Quercus michauxii 2 2 1
Sweet-gum Li uidambar s raciflua 10
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 73 72
Tag alder lnus serrulata 1
Yellow poplar Liriodendron tuli ifera 50 42
White oak Quercus alba 1
Totals 345 333 215
Total Surviving plus Volunteers = 548
p. 15
The riparian buffer zone for tree survivorship is approximately 1 acre. At the time of monitoring, 548
trees were found, including volunteers, giving a density of 548 trees per acre.
p. 16
3.3 Morphologic Exhibits
Figure WS-BR-1. As-built Planform (with monitoring stations)
Figure WS-BR-2. Year 2 Cross Sections
Figure WS-BR-3. Year 2 Longitudinal Profile
p. 17
a t4

4:
N

E
0
N--

U O

N •
C Q a
i
?

p r ? sf
f r-
?? U >/ N
y. ? c
a L Uj
/ Lo • Co 0
U O
of ?a U
r?

o
L
O
Q ?
C

cc
m

W
ca
m
C C
50 Q
O? :..'
c •C d1U
O
C (n
O f0
c 2 fl.

? o
= Q
= cc

C1

d Q
? ?

O N o Cc
in

O2
? a _

W
2 -
H ?a
UU'
Ja.
i
?Um
1
-1 N +*

d d

jr-'' -,
X
d- ,.? 41)
q1
x

a Cl)
m v .0 ?n

. T
} w U

c
? J
g'

?I T ' .?
??l J (v ?5
1
v
a
N
1
L
= O
3 pU
CL Z
v ?
?N
O NU
p .?
U V n
0. L
O W
C N ,y/
® C ?
O C)
O ® E
C to
v Q a
O
•,C?
mm
°0
e?
P
1 0 qq,?
W ? W
N O E
C C
LO O c
?U
Z
r O 9a
O U
G CL
E
? y C
i LL. v
® E
O
t/? E
4) C
O
N
0
Z3
i
4l ?
}
Q
~ n 0
F
to
r
P
N
O -- -
-- - Z T OZ - - OZ OZ M
W
1 Y

C C
-0
C
C a
A l
6 M
co
a t m
n m

L Ol
L
L
c

e
2V
4Z

N
y O

i t I v?

co 00 co 00 0
LL.
?U

CE

O

v
e ?
t-

00 ? j C4 ? M O N C?
e
?-
I N e- r N
II 11 II I II 11 11 II ? C
S
a CL S r
°
0 S
G S
Q
C ??
O
?
I o
? c
D
pp - (DD L
Q ?•.-
1 ? Qp Q
K >
Q g Q
>
>

7 7 re 32 7 7 7 3 v Z

I, C C
m `? t?0 ?N
mm C C
mm C C CL u
c O ?
?
I I aom
U -•

m
m
m
4) o
t3

y fn N fn Q j - (n
S U.
b

?f IA

r?D cD N

OO C N
O a
•- tf! ?- ! r lM I Qf r +?
n u t° l j o u ° n H H ?

` v L

?a a O O
3 "_ `
Via 3 a ?a Irv,
- 7 a

a
? -..I-- 7 3

C,
R R -
75
7 Z

--
r_ C
m m
i fn m mm m ?
I j I
I
7,
I z 0
I+1 F- ti
ql O
I'l F-
w 0

-' - --- - -
I ry -- - - N - - - - (OV
0 0

N _
a
J

N > J
i
O O C ° m o 0 ?=
O O O O
(? C7
N _
U _
5 y w

(n w a)

s U)
N
(/?
w m
cn U) N N
w :3 :3
cn Co m R m
-Y Y CO) C C/) - j, th
C Q Q} } } }
c
O (n
m O
m NO fo
m co m

m
e_
U
O J \.1 I
l
O J U
---
O J U-
O J
CD
0
r LO V Cl)
0 0 0
r r r N
0
r OD
0
r h fD iA V
0 0 0 0
r r r r Cl)
0
r
x
r
0 0
r r
0 0 co
0
0
0 0
0
0

(u
) u01lena
19
(u
) uol}enal?g r r r r

( r

4) r r

uolaen r

013 r
I I
I
I
it c ® C c
O O c O
O O
0 0 0 0
W

.,, - li 0 W
T W W
N L N
L
O
?
0
N
j N N
W m
0 IN N ? O
w N (o [r d

I
i

I

i

I
I

I ,i

i

, r

li

A I

,
/rte
I
00
O
O O
c
CL.
v U
O c
c
N U
08 ?
E
>4)?
2i 0
?g
Z?
r®
c 0U
O E ?-
? ? c
N g
%al
e
h ?yl u
N u ti
0

c
O
7
a)
1O
1°
LO C0 IN T- 0 15
O O O O O O O O a
?- r T- ?- r r r a>
(1931) U01JURAaIZI
*?

3.4 Photographs from Photostations.
p. 18

f
? d: r ? ? 4? 1• f 4 i '
i -;t
4? µ

t
1 ?
t{.
w
, t
riz't ,4c '? ?_a q{ t a*?t9`lEz T?}
?Gq .1
z ar+"+ z. +d>
?l o vr'tcw, ere § ?'it: ??+c ?yi ye _ v +i,.1? tiF 'm N
Photo Station 1. Photo-", looking upstream
Photo Station 1. Photo 1, looking downstream toward lower tie-in
I
flJy
I
Photo Station 2. Photo 3, looking downstream

u ? + ? ?'? z yy `1y
S 5M'b re h b ?R".C Nom+?,-"?T y?l t 'M- t ?, ,Y' k, !
lai"? ' y, a.•' ryL?9?+ ;??, ?, 'J."a " yi -,;z r :$ A
'phi ? ?.y" ?? ??? y'„?, +)?Wy ?,'? y ? \ • ~? ??'(??p
?• c
1
` ! V B rah i , l ? e-7)
f
v iti.•:. a h.G
Gr

? ??T ?, ?, t? fi Qi , , pi? ? ?ri'?' i":. ,,.ttA, tj r• 3' m 1!.
1

Photo Station 2. Photo 4, looking upstream

Photo Station 3. Photo 5, looking downstream

A
1 ? a

Q ?n4 p
rA
t
,y
t{
, r' .
opJ
4
eAra ,y `i "? a w s'
A.
i >y 1 : 3 4, .` e4 x r s 4 PIP. I
° } {
Photo Station 3. Photo 6, looking upstream toward upper tie-in

? ,e2h
e ; F ?

Appendix. Survey Data Tables
p. 19
Northwest Water Treatment Plant
UT to Yadkin River 2008 Monitoring
Cross Section # 1, Meander
ITS.RDF
si91 mR
Station BS H. 1. FS Water
Depth Water
Elevation Elevation
TSM # 1 53.2: 724.83 719.40 To of Culvert
P # 1 5.47 725.43 ;'2 720,01
0 6.22 719.26
5 6.36 719.12
10 6.08 719.40
15 5.76 719.72
20 6.03 719.45 To of Bank
25 7.55 717.93
30 8.83 716.65
35 9.45 716.03
37 9.73 0.00 715.75 715.75 Edge
39.3 10.32 0.64 715.80 715.16 Thalwe
41 9.70 0.00 715.78 715.78 Edge
45 8.82 716.66
50 6.32 719.16
53 5.09 720.39 To of Bank
55 5.05 720.43
60 5.39 720.09
65 5.69 719.79
70 5.94 719.54
75 6.14 719.34 END
TP # 2 4.73 72474 53.47 720.01
TBM # 1 53. ? 719.40
Northwest Water Treatment Plant
UT to Yadkin River 2008 Monitoring
Cross Section # 2, Inflection
JTS, RDF
5/21/08
Station BS H. 1. FS Water
Depth Water
Elevation Elevation
T8M # 1 5.23 724.63 719.40 To of Culvert
TF # 1 4? 725.48 4.52
720.01
0 6.42 719.06
5 5.90 719.58
10 5.44 720.04
15 5.52 719.96
20 5.90 719.58 To of Bank
25 7.30 718.18
30 9.16 716.32
34.5 9.92 0.00 715.56 715.56 Edge
36 10.40 0.55 715.63 715.08 Thalwe
37.7 9.92 0.00 715.56 715.56 Edge
42 9.73 715.75
45 8.94 716.54
50 7.08 718.40
56 5.30 720.18 To of Bank
60 5.05 720.43
65 5.57 719.91
70 5.83 719.65
75 6.06 719.42
80 6.14 719.34
85 6.33 719.15 END
TP -4 2 4.7:j 724.74 5.47 720.01
Northwest Water Treatment Plant
UT to Yadkin River 2008 Monitoring
Cross Section # 3, Inflection
JTS,RDF
5/? 1 /ns
Station BS H. 1. FS Water
Depth Water
Elevation Elevation
TEE # ' 4 9 725.89 10.4v Too of Culvert
0 6.61 719.28
5 6.31 719.58
10 6.20 719.69
15 6.03 719.86
20 5.92 719.97
25 5.68 720.21
30 5.61 720.28
34 5.76 720.13 To of Bank
38 6.77 719.12
42 7.87 718.02
45.4 9.05 0.00 716.84 716.84 Edge
47 9.17 0.15 716.87 716.72
50 9.85 0.85 716.89 716.04 Thalwe
51 9.07 0.00 716.82 716.82 Edge
55 7.79 718.10
60 5.95 719.94
62 5.31 720.58 To of Bank
65 5.10 720.79
70 5.50 720.39
75 5.71 720.18
80 5.67 720.22
85 5.79 720.10
90 5.91 719.98
95 6.02 719.87
100 6.12 719.77
105 6.15 719.74
110 6.29 719.60
113 6.13 719.76 END
TBM 1, 8.4.F 7 ; y.40 To of C wort
Northwest Water Treatment Plant
UT to Yadkin River 2008 Monitoring
Cross Section # 4, Meander
JTS,RDF
5/21/08
Station BS H. 1. FS Water
Depth Water
Elevation Elevation
TBM 4 " 8.73 725.1 3 719.40 To of Culvert
0 6.33 719.80
5 6.45 719.68
10 6.31 719.82
15 6.32 719.81
20 6.11 720.02
25 5.86 720.27
30 5.82 720.31
35 5.86 720.27
37 6.06 720.07 To of Bank
39 6.53 719.60
43 7.74 718.39
47 8.65 717.48
50 9.09 0.00 717.04 717.04 Edge
52.4 9.84 0.77 717.06 716.29 Thaiwe
55 9.12 0.00 717.01 717.01 Edge
56 8.51 717.62
60 6.45 719.68
64 5.18 720.95
70 5.62 720.51
75 5.85 720.28
80 5.98 720.15
85 5.92 720.21
90 6.12 720.01
95 6.35 719.78
100 6.51 719.62
105 6.43 719.70 END
TBIVI # 1 f 73 719,40 To of Culvert
Northwest Water Treatment Plant
UT to Yadkin River 2008 Monitoring
Cross Section # 5, Meander
JTS, RDF
5/21/08
Station BS H. 1. FS Water
Depth Water
Elevation Elevation
TBM 1 7 "' 726,51, 719.40 To of Culvert
0 6.39 720.12
10 6.61 719.90
15 6.62 719.89
20 6.66 719.85
25 6.47 720.04
30 6.31 720.20
35 6.21 720.30
40 5.73 720.78
45. 5.22 721.29
49 5.22 721.29 To of Bank
51 5.74 720.77
54 6.52 719.99
57 7.38 719.13
60 8.19 718.32
63.4 8.38 0.00 718.13 718.13 Edge
66 9.09 0.87 718.29 717.42 Thalwe
68 8.23 0.00 718.28 718.28 Edge
70 7.19 719.32
72 6.22 720.29
74 5.62 720.89 To of Bank
80 5.30 721.21
85 5.77 720.74
90 5.97 720.54
95 5.99 720.52
100 6.05 720.46
105 6.01 720.50
110 6.24 720.27
115 6.39 720.12
120 6.38 720.13
121 6.48 720.03 END
BM Az 1 7 '11 719 0 Tip of ^,uiv2rp
Northwest Water Treatment Plant
UT to Yadkin River 2008 Monitoring
Cross Section # 6, Inflection
JTS.RDF
5/21/08
Station BS H. 1. FS Water
Depth Water
Elevation Elevation
-T 3M # 1 0.7; 726.1 719.40 Top of Culver;
0 6.28 719.82
10 6.21 719.89
20 5.93 720.17
30 5.92 720.18
40 5.68 720.42
50 5.60 720.50
60 5.40 720.70
70 5.08 721.02
75 5.38 720.72 To of Bank
77, 5.76 720.34
79 6.72 719.38
80.8 7.62 0.00 718.48 718.48 Edge
83 7.88 0.25 718.47 718.22
85.5 8.36 0.75 718.49 717.74 Thalwe
89.5 7.67 0.00 718.43 718.43 Edge
92 6.57 719.53
94 5.70 720.40
97 4.87 721.23 To of Bank
100 4.78 721.32
110 5.20 720.90
120 5.37 720.73
130 5.65 720.45
140 5.61 720.49
150 5.87 720.23
160 5.82 720.28
167 5.95 720.15 END
TBIm #, 1 6,70 719.40 To of Culvert
Northwest Water Treatment Plant
UT to Yadkin River 2008 Monitoring
Cross Section # 7, Inflection
JTS, RDF
si? 1 rnR
Station BS H. 1. FS Water
Depth Water
Elevation Elevation
TBM f# 2 4.93 726,39 721.46 Tory of Rehar
0 6.25 720.14
10 6.25 720.14
20 5.91 720.48
30 5.91 720.48
40 5.95 720.44
50 5.93 720.46
60 5.80 720.59
70 5.83 720.56
80 5.68 720.71
85 5.56 720.83
90 5.18 721.21 To of Bank
92 5.39 721.00
94 5.91 720.48
96 6.79 719.60
97.5 7.15 0.00 719.24 719.24 Edge
99 8.10 0.95 719.24 718.29 Thalwe
100.4 7.16 0.00 719.23 719.23 Edge
102 6.60 719.79
104 5.75 720.64
106 5.15 721.24
108 4.88 721.51 To of Bank
110 4.97 721.42
120 5.02 721.37
130 5.37 721.02
140 5.21 721.18
150 5.09 721.30
167 5.04 721.35 END
T MI, 4 2 93 '21.46 Top of Reaar
'
9178lL 98 SL'LLL SL M T F 998
! 009
61,'8LL 9"01 Z9L1L L£"0 Zl l98 S6S
OS'8LL 1L 69 LLL SL "0 Zl lS8 S8S
84'8 LL 6 £LLLL LL LL Lb8 SLS
OS'8LL S OL £9 LLL SZ 0 ZL L£8 999
917'8LL S'6 L9 LLL SL LL L LZ8 999
Z9 '8LL LL L9LLL S'0 ZL LL8 S49
Z9SLL 6 LL LLL S'OL LL LOS S£S
Z9 e L ' S'O 1 BS LLL L8'O ZL L6L SZS
09'8LL L LO'8LL Z9L LL L8L SLS
Z9'8LL 8 S6'LLL L£'8 LL LLL SOS
LML ll 69 LLL S"ll 11 L9L S6b
L9'81L 1 0L 48"LLL SL 6 L L LSL 9817
99"8tL L 8081L L8'9 LL L4L SL4
£C81L L S18LL 9 11 L£L 994
£L 81L 9 L l LL"LLL S'Ol l l LZL 994
LCBIL OL b6'LLL S8 lL 1LL 9171,

8L'8lL
LL L8'LLL
L£6 r--
11
i LOL
S£b
08'8LL L ZZ8LL ZL"S _
Ll - L69 SZ4
L68LL 6 j 1 9L"8LL L8 'S LL _T 189 Stb
688LL 90L LOStL Z9L Ll LL9 SOb
817 0£L OL 99'6ZL 999 OOb
ZL 8LL 6 L6'LLL ZL 8 LL 999 06£
£6'8LL S L 0£'SlL ZL 17 l l 949 08£
96'8LL 0 l 96 LLL L£'8 _
LL- 9£9 OL£
968LL OL 6L9lL L£9 LL 9Z9 09£
L68LL 8 O£'8LL ZL'4 LL 9L9 OS£
86'8LL 1 9'9 b4'8tL S'Z LL j 909 Ob£
1706LL OL LZ"8ML 9z9 l1 969 0££
£0'6LL 6 8Z8LL L£'4 LL 989 OZ£
ZO6LL 8 9£'8LL S£ LL 9L9 Ot£
r `5 Z4 :
906LL 9'6 9Z'8 LL L89 ZL 999 00£
906LL 6 LC8LL ££"S ZL L99 96Z
60'6LL 9'8 8£"8LL S 17 ZL lSG I S8Z
LL 61L OL LZ'8LL SCS ZL LbS SLZ
£l6LL 9'8 Z4'8LL 4 Z1 L£S S9Z
£l"6LL 6 8£'8LL Sb ZL LZS SSZ
SZ'6LL S 48"8LL Ll Ll LlS S4Z
LZ"6LL S"8 09 "8LL £ ZL LOS I S£Z
£Z"6LL 9"M 9£'8LL SCb ZL 1617 SZZ
9Z6LL ! b £6'8LL L8"6 LL L817 SLZ
9Z 6U 0 L SZ81L 9 ZL LLb SOZ
LZ6LL SS L881L SZ"lt LL L9b 96l
9ML 9 SL'8LL 0 Zl 194 99L
_ 4£6LL S'9 6L8LL S'LL ll Oct, 179L
Lb"6LL S 66"8LL ZL6 L1 9Zb 09L
4C'6LL ! 9 Z6'8LL M 1L 95, OSL
Lb6LL S8 OL8LL Z90 ZL I 904 Obl
Zb6LL 8 SL 81L 0 ZL 96£ 0£L
1746LL j 99 06'8LL SZOL LL 98£ OZL
94'6lL 9 96'8LL 9'6 L1 9L£ Otl
ZS"6LL S"£ £Z6lL SZ'9 ll 99£ OOL
OS 6LL L Z6 8LL OL LL 99£ 06
bS 6LL b 261L 9"9 L L j 94£ 08
966LL S L 4S"8LL SZ ZL 9££ OL
69 6LL £ 4£"6LL S Ll 9Z£ 09
LL"6lL S'L 60"6LL 8 11 9L£ OS
4L6LL 9L ZL6LL Z9L LL 90£ Ob
8L'6LL 4
- S4 6LL Z9 £ L L 96Z 0£
98 6
L9 L ZZ 6LL L£"9 L L 98Z OZ
886LL 6 £L'6LL S'L ll 9LZ OL
9861L 6 LL6LL SLL LL 99Z 0

" s V,
"
aaa? you! Laad laa;
uogena13 uo!;ena13
s;uawwOO/saloN ?aLeM 11 H1d3C 431NM punoa?/Pa8 youl laa? 099d you! (15
;aa;
@;) 1 1991)
JNIGV3a
(-)s- IH (+)S9 vis
3dVi
80-AeW-ZZ agjhjo
d Cb 'alnog l r
yaeoa iodd,,
9uuopu0W 0190.id IemPnli' uol 8007.
/yilq /?uno_) ylits.ioj 7y males-uo7swA1
.LNV7d IN12t TIVHH.I H2[IVM ISdAcli IHON
86SLL ILL LO'SLL S9 £L S'ZZSL OEE
SL 9LL ' S 9 L9 SLL Z Cl S ZLSL ON
61'9LL S'OL Z£'SLL SS Cl 9'Z05L OL£
EZ9LL LL ZESLL S'S EL 9MVb ON
6L'%L 8 £S SLL £ £L 9 'Z9bl 1 06Z
EZ9LL S5 8L9LL 0 EL 9ZLbL 08Z
Z£ 9LL 1 0 ZE'SLL 99 £t S Z9bL OLZ
Z£'9LL ! 8 99 S1L 9 1 £L S ZSbL 09Z
ZE'91L SS 989LL L1 ZL 9 Z44L 05Z
1717'91L S co %L 6 ZL 9 ZE4L ObZ
5S'9LL 5Z8 98'SLL LL ZL S'ZZ4L OEZ
179'9 LL I L8OL £L'SLL 9'0 El S'ZL4L OZZ
OL'9LL L£'9 0091L 5Z6 ZL S'ZObI OLZ
SL 91L L8 LL LL 91Z ZL'0 Cl S'Z6EL OOZ
9L'9LL Z96 96'9 1 L SL '6 ZL SZ8£L 063
SL 91L Z9 L L 49'91L Z9 'L EL SZLEL 08L
08'9LL L£ L 8L'9LL ZL L ZL SZ9£L OLL
E99LL Z90 L 8LSLL 0 i Cl SZSEL 09L
99 9U Z9'L L ZLSLL Z90 EL S'Zb£L 1 OSL
6891E 'SL LZ9LL Z19 ZL S'ZC£L Obl
E69LL 10 L 1 £6'S1L ZL OL ZL S ZZEL 0£L
t,6 %L IL L 98SLL LL ZL S'ZLEI OZL
86'9[L 9L'6 LL 9LZ
LOLLL Z96 LZ'9lL SL'9 Zl 9UZL OOl
90 LLL !9Z 9 45 9L1 L8'Z ! ZL 9'ZSZL 06
LL LLL Z99 499112 Z9 L ZL 9'ZLZL 09
9L'LLL 'SZ'£ L 69'9U Z9OL ! Zl 9Z9ZL OL
9L LLL ISZ'8 Z17 %L Z9 'E ZL S ZSZL 09
LZ'LLL Ol 8E 912E 5L 'b Zl 9'ZbZL OS
L£'LLL ILEOL 44912E b ZL j S'Z£ZL I Ob
0£LLL 1SZE jl £091212 6 ZL S'ZZZL OE
041212E 'L8'b 669LL L£'6 LL 9ZLZI OZ
OS'LLL IL Z6'9 LL 5Z'OL LL S'ZOZL OL
ino;-nlnoiv OSLLL 5ZE L EZ9LL S'9 ZL 9M1 0
ya a

?
,..
C

s}uawwo sa o
D/ 3 N Taal you! . 0681
uogena13
aa3eM H1d30 d31VM laa}
uogenal3
punaE/pag yow 3991 1091 youi 3991

OSd IH (+)S8 laa} }aa1
JNIQH32!
H1S
3dvi
80-AeIN-8Z
yoeaa lamo-I
ay}lsjod p y 'alnoS 'i'r

G w^v1
ETC, ---
r 6>
lUanlno;y
N SbL1L Z t 8Z9LL SL '4 EL BELL ZL8
84LLL 8 L89LL L£OL ZL 9£1212 OL8
ESLLL 96 4L9LL SZ'IL ZL 9ZLL 098
ZSLLL S L L Ob9LL LE'£ EL 9LLL 099
99LLL 9'9 LO'LLL 8 ZL 90LL I 048
L9L1L 96 88'9LL Z96 ZL 9601 0£8
9LLLL 0 L 9L 9L/ LL ZL 980L On
178 LLL 8 1 LL LLL ZL 9 ZL 9120E OL8
116'LLL 9'LL 86'9LL LE '8 ZL 990E 008
96'LLL L L 899LL Z96 ZL 990E 06L
£0'8LL Z L LS'9LL SL '6 ZL 9bOl 0812
EL8LL 8 94LLL Z9'Z ZL 9EOl I OLL
60'8LL 0 L 60 LLL ZL L ZL 9ZOL !. 0912
LL 8LL 0 l l l LLL L8 9 ZL 91201 OSL
EL 8LL S L l 00LLL Z1'8 Zl 900E 0412
EL'8LL 1 LL LZLLL Z99 ZL 966 0£12
LL'SLL 96 8E LLL Z9 £ ZL 986 OZL
OZ8LL ! OL LE'LLZ 9LT ZL 9126 OLL
£Z 8LL Z L 90 LLL LE 'L ZL 996 OOL
9Z'8LL 8 09LLL L ZL 956 069
ZE 8LL 6 LS LLL SZ L ZL 946 089
SE 81L 6 09ZLL L z: 9£6 OL9
049LL 9'0L ZSZLL 1291 ZL 9Z6 099
9E8LL 6 L9'L1L L80 1 ZL 9126 099
L£8LL S'OL 6bLLL SZZ Zl 906 049
9£ 9LL 0 L I 9E LLL L8 E ZL 968 OE9
57SlL Sll StLLL SLZ ZL 988 OZ9
b49 LL 8 12121212E LS 01 LL
9L8
OL9
. y
13
340 1532.5 9.3 715.00 1 1 1 716.08
_
350 1542.5 13 5.5 715.32 91 716.07
360 1552.5 13 3.8 71546 6.51
. 716.00
370 1562.5 13 8.5 715
.07 1 ! 0 j 716.07
380 1572.5 ! 13 Z5 715.15 10.5 716.03
390 1 1582.5 13 9.5 714.98 11 ' 715.90
400 1592.5 13 4.5 715.40 7 715.98
410 1602.5 13 10.5 714.90 ! 1 ! 0 715.90
420 1612.5 13 6 715.28 7.51 715.90
430
1622 5 13 8 715.11 9 715.86
1
440 632.5 13 6 715.28 6.5 715.82
77D f '3
-2
2
2
450 1642.5 13 10.12 714.96 9.5 715.76
460 1652.5 13 10.25 714.95 975 715.77
470 1662.5 13 11.5 714.85 11.12 715.78
480 1672.5 13 8.12 715.13 7.25 715.73
490 1682.5 14 5.25 714.37 11 4.25 71512
500 1692.5 13 9 715.06 ! 7.37 715.67
510 1702.5 13 8.87 715.07 6.62 715.62
520 1712.5 14 1 714.72 10' 715.56
530 1722.5 14 1.37 714 69 9.871 715.52
540 1732.5 14 2.12 714.63 10.12 715.47
550 1742.5 13 1135 714.83 7.87i 715.48
560 1752.5 14 5.12 714.38 1 1.371 715.49
570 1762.5 j 13 10.25 714.95 6.621 715.50
580 1772.5 13 1 10.75 714.91 5.871 715.40
590 1782.5 14 2.12 714.63 8.871 715.37
600 1792.5 14 4.87 714.40 10.25 715.26
610 1802.5 14 1.62 714.67 6 715.17
620 1812.5 14 3.25 714.54 6.87 715.11
630 1822.5 14 4.62 714.42 8.12 715.10
640 1832.5 14 3.37 714.53 6.12 715.04
650 1842.5 14 5.12 714.38 1 7 714.96
660 1852.5 14 7.25 714.20 9.5 714.99
670 1862.5 14 3.87 714.48 51 714.90
680 1872.5 14 5 714.39 1 5 714.81
690 1882.5 ! 14 7 714.22 6.51 714.77
700 1892.5 14 8.5 71410 8' 714.77
710 1902.5 14 5.5 714.35 3.5 714.64
720 1912.5 14 7.5 714.18 5 714.60
730 1922.5 14 8.75 714.08 6.5 714.62
740 1932.5 ! 14 9.5 714.02 7 714.60
750 1942.5 15 1 713.72 10 714.56
760 1952.5 14 8 714.14 5 714.56
770 1962.5T 14 7.25 714.20 4 714.54
780 1972.5 ! 14 9 714.06 5.5 714.52
790 1982.5 i 14 11.5 713.85 8.5 714.56
794 1986 5 15 1 3 713.56 1 0.5 1 714.60

NORTHWEST WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Beroth Road Stream Restoration
2008
Longitudinal Profile
Te onC
27-May-08
Bed/Ground
STA BS(+) HI FS(-) Elevation
feet inch feet feet inch feet Water
WATER DEPTH Elevation
feet inch feet
Notes/Comments
TJV '> G''. l:? 3 4
p 9 1.75 101.38 7 101.97
10 8 7.75 101.88 4 102.22
20 8 11.37 101.58 8 102.25
30 8 11.12 101.60 8 102.27
40 8 5.87 102.04 4.5 102.41
5p 8 1 4.75 102.13 5 102.55
60 8 3.62 102.23 4.5 102.60
70 8 4.12 102.18 7 102.77
80 8 8.87 101.79 11 12 102.79
90 8 6.75 101.97 10 102.80
100 8 2.75 102.30 6 102.80
110 7 8.75 102.80 3 103.05
120 7 5.75 103.05 2.5 103.26
130 8 2.87 102.29 12 103.29
140 8 1.62 102.39 10 103.23
150 7 7.75 102.88 4 103.22
160 7 4.25 103.17 4.5 103.55
170 7 7.87 ! 102.87 10 103.71
180 7 10.12 102.68 11 103.60
190 7 6.87 102.96 8 103.62
200 6 11.87 103.54 2 103.71
210 6 9.87 103.71 4 104.04
220 6 11.12 103.60 6 104.10
230 7 2.5 103.32 10 104.15
240 6 10.87 ! 103.62 6 10412
250 6 6.12 104.02 3.5 104.31
260 ! 6 4.25 104.17 5 104.59
270 6 7.87 ! 103.87 9 104.62
280 7 0.12 103.52 13 104.60

290 13 3 103.66 11 104.58
300 12 4 104.58 3 104.83
310 12 1.25 104.81 5.5 105.27
320 12 5 104.50 10 105.33
330 12 3.62 104.61 8.5 105.32
340 11 10.37 105.05 4.5 105.42
350 ! 11 6.5 105.37 4.5 105.75
360 11 9.87 105.09 9 105.84
370 11 8.25 105.23 7.5 105.85
380 11 11 105.00 10.5 105.87
390 1 11 6.62 105.36 6 105.86
400 11 2.87 105.67 4 106.01
410 11 1 105.83 4.5 106.21
420 10 9.25 106.14 2.5 106.35
430 11 6.87 105.34 1 t5 106.47
440 10 11.75 105.93 6 106.43
448 11 0.62 105.86 7 106.45 At Stake
458 11 1.5 105.79 7.5 106.41 END, At Rebar
10 5.87 106.42 To of Rebar
7.5 1'

NORTHWEST WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Beroth Road Stream Restoration
2008
JTS, RDF
97-RAav-n8
Bed/Ground
STA BS(+) HI FS(-) !
Elevation
WATER DEPTH ; Water

Elevation
Notes/Comments
feet inch feet feet inch ! feet feet inch (feet) I

TBM #2 5 7.37 105.34 New Rebar, b X-Sec 1; 0+00
' 0 Reba 3, t . re" Bern ,
I
Cross Section # 1
Inflection between Curve # 2 and Curve # 3

STA BS(+)

feet 'inch HI

feet FS(-)

feet inch Bed/Ground
Elevation
feet WATER DEPTH Water
Elevation
feet inch feet
Notes/Comments
Itt 4 2 1 3 2.06
4
1
0 6 8.87 105.32
5 6 10.62 105.17
10 7 0.37 105.03
15 7 2.12 104.88
20 7 1.87 104.90
25 7 2 104.89
30 7 1.25 104.95
35 7 1.25 104.95
40 6 11.62 105.09
44 6 11.75 105.08 To of Bank
47 7 8.75 104.33
50 8 3.25 i 103.79
52.2
53.2
?- 9 1 0.5
9 3.62 103.02
102.76 0 103.02
4 103.09 Ed e of Water
Thalwe
55 9 0.62 103.01 0 103.01 Ed e of Water
58 7 11.62 104.09
60.5 7 1.25 104.95
65 7 1.37 104.94
70 7 2.75 104.83
75 7 4.5 104.68
80 7 4 104.73
85 7 7.25 104.45
90 7 8.87 104.32
95 7 10 104.23
100 7 5.62 10459,
END

. .,
NORTHWEST WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Beroth Road Stream Restoration
2008
Cross Section # 2
Meander (Curve 6)
1rc onG
27-Mav-08
BS(+)
STA
feet inch HI

feet feet FS(-)

inch Bed/Ground
Elevation
feet WATER DEPTH

feet inch Water
Elevation
feet
Notes/Comments
34
0 5 3.37 106.78
5 5 3.25 106.79
10 5 4.12 106.72
15 5 6.37 106.53
20 5 9.5 106.27
25 5 7 12 106.47
27.2 5 6.87 - 106.49 To of Bank
29 6 6.75 105.50
30 6 11.5 105.10
31 7 5.87 104.57 0 104.57 Edge of Water
31.2 8 4 103.73 10 104.56 Thalwe
32 8 3 10181 9 104.56
34 7 6.25 104.54 0 104.54 Edge of Water
35 6 8.37 105.36
37 6 7.12 105.47
40 6 0.37 106.03
42 5 7.5 106.43 To of Bank
45 5 7 106.48
50 5 7.62 106.42
55 5 6.25 106.54
60 5 8.12 106.38
65 5 2.62 106.84
70 4 10.5 107.18
75 5 1.87 106.90
80 4 10.12 107.22
85 4 3.37 107.78
90 4 1,12 107.97 END

NORTHWEST WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Beroth Road Stream Restoration
2008
Cross Section # 3
Meander (Curve 9)
ITS RDF
27-May-08
STA BS(+) HI FS(-)

11 feet inch feet feet inch Bed/Ground
Elevation
feet WATER DEPTH Water
Elevation
feet inch feet
Notes/Comments
-i; # 21 '1, 3 2 2 „-
2 4 1 2
0 4 10.62 111.01
5 5 2.37 110.69
10 5 5.25 110.45
15 5 8.5 110.18
20 5 11.25 109.95
25 6 3.25 109.62
30 6 4.25 109.54
35 6 6.12 109.38
38 6 6 109.39 To of Bank
40 7 3.75 108.58
42 8 4.25 107.54
44 8 7.62 107.26
45 9 5.37 106.44 0 106.44 Edge of Water
47 9 11.5 105.93 6 106.43 Thalwe
48 9 11.37 105.94 6 106.44 ' Edge of Water
48.3 8 10.25 107.04
50 8 8.25 107.20
52 7 7.12 108.30 To of Bank
55 7 5.75 108.41
60 7 6.62 108.34
65 7 6 108.39
70 7 2.87 108.65
75 7 0 108.89
80 6 9.25 109.12
85 6 7.12 109.30
90 6 3.62 109.59 END
,t

NORTHWEST WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Beroth Road Stream Restoration
2008
Cross Section # 4
Inflection
ITC PnF
27-May-08

BS(+) HI FS(-)
STA
feet inch feet feet inch Bed/Ground

Elevation
feet Water
WATER DEPTH
Elevation
feet inch feet

Notes/Comments
i! L l
? 34
3 11.87
0 108.07
5 4 2.12 107.88
10 4 3.12 107.80
15 I 4 4.25 107.70
20 4 5.87 107.57
25 4 7.62 107.42
30 4 9.62 107.26
35 5 0.37 107.03
40 5 ! 0.75 107.00
45 5 2 106.89 To of Bank
47 6 1.75 105.91
49 6 7.87 105.40
49.5 6 10.75 105.16 0 105.16 Edge of Water
50.8 7 2.5 104.85 4 105.18 Thalwe
52.7 6 10.75 105.16 0 105.16 Edge of Water
54 6 4.62 105.67
56 5 3.37 106.78 To of Bank
60 5 i 3.87 106.74
65 5 i 2.87 106.82
70 5 4.75 106.66
75 5 2.12 106.88
80 4 10.5 107.18
85 5 2.25 106.87
90 5 0.37 107.03
95 4 7.37 107.44
100 4 4.37 107.69 END